{"id":"47ee31328956f6e766c48e85b4722a487b5e1bd251a7fc297ea0964a5eba0220","title":"A case for AI-enabled monitoring at farm gates","argument":"The authors argue that UK farm security rests on thin evidence despite the costs attributed to rural crime. Their PRISMA guided review found limited UK research, no independent evaluation of cameras, sensors, trackers or marking, and no study of how often farm gates are left open or what follows. Camera-trap AI papers reported accuracy on ecological datasets, but none in the reviewed records tested it at a farm gate; one comparison found machine learning detected 41% of wildlife against 81% for analysts. From these gaps, the authors argue—not as a demonstrated effect—that continuous gate-level AI-mediated monitoring, as implemented in Fieldmark AI, would be highly beneficial for UK farm security. They say it could create farm-level, time-stamped records, verify events that periodic human checks miss, help resolve whether foxes, dogs or people were responsible, and give other security measures something to be tested against. The authors say no study has shown that monitoring reduces loss, and set out the evaluation needed to show whether it does.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The authors’ case for gate-level monitoring is an inference from evidence gaps, not a demonstrated effect. The authors report no study showing that monitoring reduces farm losses.","speaker":{"name":"Symes, Steve, Fergus, Paul, Carr, Mark, McIver, Omar, Jones, Arwyn","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"The Case for AI-Enabled Gate Monitoring as Farm Security in the UK: A PRISMA-Guided Review of the Evidence on Rural Crime, Livestock Predation and Farm Access","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","publishedAt":"2026-11-10","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors describe the UK evidence on farm security as limited, including no independent evaluation of cameras, sensors, trackers or marking and no study of how often farm gates are left open.","excerpt":"We found no independent evaluation of cameras, sensors, trackers or marking","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that camera-trap AI papers in the records they reviewed used ecological datasets, not farm gates; in one comparison machine learning detected less wildlife than analysts.","excerpt":"Camera-trap AI papers report accuracy on ecological datasets, none at a farm gate in the records we found, and in one comparison machine learning detected 41% of wildlife against 81% for analysts.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue, as an inference rather than a demonstrated effect, that continuous gate-level AI-mediated monitoring could create farm-level records, verify events and help identify who or what was responsible.","excerpt":"We argue, as an inference from these gaps and not as a demonstrated effect, that continuous gate-level AI-mediated monitoring, as implemented in Fieldmark AI, would be highly beneficial for UK farm security.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say no study has shown that monitoring reduces loss and that they describe an evaluation needed to test this.","excerpt":"No study has yet shown that it reduces loss, and we set out the evaluation needed to show it.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","checkedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"What evaluation would show whether continuous gate-level AI-mediated monitoring reduces farm losses?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"A case for AI-enabled monitoring at farm gates","summary":"The authors argue that UK farm security rests on thin evidence despite the costs attributed to rural crime. Their PRISMA guided review found limited UK research, no independent evaluation of cameras, sensors, trackers or marking, and no study of how often farm gates are left open or what follows. Camera-trap AI papers reported accuracy on ecological datasets, but none in the reviewed records tested it at a farm gate; one comparison found machine learning detected 41% of wildlife against 81% for analysts. From these gaps, the authors argue—not as a demonstrated effect—that continuous gate-level AI-mediated monitoring, as implemented in Fieldmark AI, would be highly beneficial for UK farm security. They say it could create farm-level, time-stamped records, verify events that periodic human checks miss, help resolve whether foxes, dogs or people were responsible, and give other security measures something to be tested against. The authors say no study has shown that monitoring reduces loss, and set out the evaluation needed to show whether it does.","question":"What evaluation would show whether continuous gate-level AI-mediated monitoring reduces farm losses?","claims":[{"text":"The authors describe the UK evidence on farm security as limited, including no independent evaluation of cameras, sensors, trackers or marking and no study of how often farm gates are left open.","excerpt":"We found no independent evaluation of cameras, sensors, trackers or marking","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that camera-trap AI papers in the records they reviewed used ecological datasets, not farm gates; in one comparison machine learning detected less wildlife than analysts.","excerpt":"Camera-trap AI papers report accuracy on ecological datasets, none at a farm gate in the records we found, and in one comparison machine learning detected 41% of wildlife against 81% for analysts.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue, as an inference rather than a demonstrated effect, that continuous gate-level AI-mediated monitoring could create farm-level records, verify events and help identify who or what was responsible.","excerpt":"We argue, as an inference from these gaps and not as a demonstrated effect, that continuous gate-level AI-mediated monitoring, as implemented in Fieldmark AI, would be highly beneficial for UK farm security.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say no study has shown that monitoring reduces loss and that they describe an evaluation needed to test this.","excerpt":"No study has yet shown that it reduces loss, and we set out the evaluation needed to show it.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The authors’ case for gate-level monitoring is an inference from evidence gaps, not a demonstrated effect.","The authors report no study showing that monitoring reduces farm losses."],"mediaId":"66d25e68d2449af30ddf7bcfb8cfce63a6aaf49a7584fddf78b8a2f40bfaaec0","correctionReason":null,"id":"47ee31328956f6e766c48e85b4722a487b5e1bd251a7fc297ea0964a5eba0220","publicationId":"6aeb7e72-6261-499f-8aab-bc6b70151f32","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","sourceTitle":"The Case for AI-Enabled Gate Monitoring as Farm Security in the UK: A PRISMA-Guided Review of the Evidence on Rural Crime, Livestock Predation and Farm Access","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-10","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-11T05:01:05.163Z","createdAt":"2026-11-12T02:32:12.042Z","historical":false,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"66d25e68d2449af30ddf7bcfb8cfce63a6aaf49a7584fddf78b8a2f40bfaaec0","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-12T02:31:23.359Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","checkedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["useful_perspective"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v6","mediaId":"66d25e68d2449af30ddf7bcfb8cfce63a6aaf49a7584fddf78b8a2f40bfaaec0","confidence":0.66,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"de081d010d7a4140e2563e4659a10833c086413f684310e5f60249be4094c7b6","decidedAt":"2026-11-12T02:31:24.378Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"ecf54a8529e634e3dba168b507534f791796c9a57b27588044fe541b2a48f003","observationId":"03c262273f42a5e5e33407c82dbc331aa444d49ed7fc8b4210fcd9fec0d92a34","retrievedAt":"2026-11-12T02:31:23.240Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"824b0b26-1daf-4c4c-84a0-3cffe1fda36e"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"249904a9-9193-43f4-8993-1fc58d587421"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-11-12T02:32:12.042Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Symes, Steve","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Fergus, Paul","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Carr, Mark","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"McIver, Omar","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Jones, Arwyn","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Symes, Steve","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Symes, Steve","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"ffd31a3d8009236f13ac2b861a0a63eefde5c1f41809d675701b52e6bb61a9bf:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"ffd31a3d8009236f13ac2b861a0a63eefde5c1f41809d675701b52e6bb61a9bf","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","contentSha256":"ca96573efe82394f944c574dc62eb6268b2eae8ea125f5c09852ee31225aba88","textHash":"ecf54a8529e634e3dba168b507534f791796c9a57b27588044fe541b2a48f003","observedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Fergus, Paul","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Fergus, Paul","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"ffd31a3d8009236f13ac2b861a0a63eefde5c1f41809d675701b52e6bb61a9bf:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"ffd31a3d8009236f13ac2b861a0a63eefde5c1f41809d675701b52e6bb61a9bf","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","contentSha256":"ca96573efe82394f944c574dc62eb6268b2eae8ea125f5c09852ee31225aba88","textHash":"ecf54a8529e634e3dba168b507534f791796c9a57b27588044fe541b2a48f003","observedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Carr, Mark","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Carr, Mark","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"ffd31a3d8009236f13ac2b861a0a63eefde5c1f41809d675701b52e6bb61a9bf:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"ffd31a3d8009236f13ac2b861a0a63eefde5c1f41809d675701b52e6bb61a9bf","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","contentSha256":"ca96573efe82394f944c574dc62eb6268b2eae8ea125f5c09852ee31225aba88","textHash":"ecf54a8529e634e3dba168b507534f791796c9a57b27588044fe541b2a48f003","observedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"McIver, Omar","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"McIver, Omar","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"ffd31a3d8009236f13ac2b861a0a63eefde5c1f41809d675701b52e6bb61a9bf:participation:3","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"ffd31a3d8009236f13ac2b861a0a63eefde5c1f41809d675701b52e6bb61a9bf","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","contentSha256":"ca96573efe82394f944c574dc62eb6268b2eae8ea125f5c09852ee31225aba88","textHash":"ecf54a8529e634e3dba168b507534f791796c9a57b27588044fe541b2a48f003","observedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Jones, Arwyn","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Jones, Arwyn","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"ffd31a3d8009236f13ac2b861a0a63eefde5c1f41809d675701b52e6bb61a9bf:participation:4","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"ffd31a3d8009236f13ac2b861a0a63eefde5c1f41809d675701b52e6bb61a9bf","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","contentSha256":"ca96573efe82394f944c574dc62eb6268b2eae8ea125f5c09852ee31225aba88","textHash":"ecf54a8529e634e3dba168b507534f791796c9a57b27588044fe541b2a48f003","observedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":5,"returned":5,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","snapshotId":"ffd31a3d8009236f13ac2b861a0a63eefde5c1f41809d675701b52e6bb61a9bf","contentSha256":"ca96573efe82394f944c574dc62eb6268b2eae8ea125f5c09852ee31225aba88","textHash":"ecf54a8529e634e3dba168b507534f791796c9a57b27588044fe541b2a48f003","observedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":41,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/47ee31328956f6e766c48e85b4722a487b5e1bd251a7fc297ea0964a5eba0220/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/a-case-for-ai-enabled-monitoring-at-farm-gates-47ee3132","formats":{"html":"/readings/a-case-for-ai-enabled-monitoring-at-farm-gates-47ee3132","markdown":"/readings/a-case-for-ai-enabled-monitoring-at-farm-gates-47ee3132.md","json":"/readings/a-case-for-ai-enabled-monitoring-at-farm-gates-47ee3132.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[{"id":"term-machine-learning","name":"Machine learning","explanation":"Methods that let computers learn patterns from examples instead of following rules written by hand.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#machine-learning"}],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"},{"id":"time","name":"TIME","kind":"organization","context":"TIME is a news magazine publishing reporting on world affairs, business, technology and the workers behind digital services.","referenceUrls":["https://time.com/"],"path":"/entities/time","json":"/entities/time.json","markdown":"/entities/time.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"47ee31328956f6e766c48e85b4722a487b5e1bd251a7fc297ea0964a5eba0220","revision":"6aeb7e72-6261-499f-8aab-bc6b70151f32","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"A case for AI-enabled monitoring at farm gates","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/a-case-for-ai-enabled-monitoring-at-farm-gates-47ee3132"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","revision":"ecf54a8529e634e3dba168b507534f791796c9a57b27588044fe541b2a48f003","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"The Case for AI-Enabled Gate Monitoring as Farm Security in the UK: A PRISMA-Guided Review of the Evidence on Rural Crime, Livestock Predation and Farm Access","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"47ee31328956f6e766c48e85b4722a487b5e1bd251a7fc297ea0964a5eba0220","title":"A case for AI-enabled monitoring at farm gates","argument":"The authors argue that UK farm security rests on thin evidence despite the costs attributed to rural crime. Their PRISMA guided review found limited UK research, no independent evaluation of cameras, sensors, trackers or marking, and no study of how often farm gates are left open or what follows. Camera-trap AI papers reported accuracy on ecological datasets, but none in the reviewed records tested it at a farm gate; one comparison found machine learning detected 41% of wildlife against 81% for analysts. From these gaps, the authors argue—not as a demonstrated effect—that continuous gate-level AI-mediated monitoring, as implemented in Fieldmark AI, would be highly beneficial for UK farm security. They say it could create farm-level, time-stamped records, verify events that periodic human checks miss, help resolve whether foxes, dogs or people were responsible, and give other security measures something to be tested against. The authors say no study has shown that monitoring reduces loss, and set out the evaluation needed to show whether it does.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The authors’ case for gate-level monitoring is an inference from evidence gaps, not a demonstrated effect. The authors report no study showing that monitoring reduces farm losses.","speaker":{"name":"Symes, Steve, Fergus, Paul, Carr, Mark, McIver, Omar, Jones, Arwyn","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"The Case for AI-Enabled Gate Monitoring as Farm Security in the UK: A PRISMA-Guided Review of the Evidence on Rural Crime, Livestock Predation and Farm Access","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","publishedAt":"2026-11-10","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors describe the UK evidence on farm security as limited, including no independent evaluation of cameras, sensors, trackers or marking and no study of how often farm gates are left open.","excerpt":"We found no independent evaluation of cameras, sensors, trackers or marking","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that camera-trap AI papers in the records they reviewed used ecological datasets, not farm gates; in one comparison machine learning detected less wildlife than analysts.","excerpt":"Camera-trap AI papers report accuracy on ecological datasets, none at a farm gate in the records we found, and in one comparison machine learning detected 41% of wildlife against 81% for analysts.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue, as an inference rather than a demonstrated effect, that continuous gate-level AI-mediated monitoring could create farm-level records, verify events and help identify who or what was responsible.","excerpt":"We argue, as an inference from these gaps and not as a demonstrated effect, that continuous gate-level AI-mediated monitoring, as implemented in Fieldmark AI, would be highly beneficial for UK farm security.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say no study has shown that monitoring reduces loss and that they describe an evaluation needed to test this.","excerpt":"No study has yet shown that it reduces loss, and we set out the evaluation needed to show it.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","checkedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"What evaluation would show whether continuous gate-level AI-mediated monitoring reduces farm losses?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"A case for AI-enabled monitoring at farm gates","summary":"The authors argue that UK farm security rests on thin evidence despite the costs attributed to rural crime. Their PRISMA guided review found limited UK research, no independent evaluation of cameras, sensors, trackers or marking, and no study of how often farm gates are left open or what follows. Camera-trap AI papers reported accuracy on ecological datasets, but none in the reviewed records tested it at a farm gate; one comparison found machine learning detected 41% of wildlife against 81% for analysts. From these gaps, the authors argue—not as a demonstrated effect—that continuous gate-level AI-mediated monitoring, as implemented in Fieldmark AI, would be highly beneficial for UK farm security. They say it could create farm-level, time-stamped records, verify events that periodic human checks miss, help resolve whether foxes, dogs or people were responsible, and give other security measures something to be tested against. The authors say no study has shown that monitoring reduces loss, and set out the evaluation needed to show whether it does.","question":"What evaluation would show whether continuous gate-level AI-mediated monitoring reduces farm losses?","claims":[{"text":"The authors describe the UK evidence on farm security as limited, including no independent evaluation of cameras, sensors, trackers or marking and no study of how often farm gates are left open.","excerpt":"We found no independent evaluation of cameras, sensors, trackers or marking","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that camera-trap AI papers in the records they reviewed used ecological datasets, not farm gates; in one comparison machine learning detected less wildlife than analysts.","excerpt":"Camera-trap AI papers report accuracy on ecological datasets, none at a farm gate in the records we found, and in one comparison machine learning detected 41% of wildlife against 81% for analysts.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue, as an inference rather than a demonstrated effect, that continuous gate-level AI-mediated monitoring could create farm-level records, verify events and help identify who or what was responsible.","excerpt":"We argue, as an inference from these gaps and not as a demonstrated effect, that continuous gate-level AI-mediated monitoring, as implemented in Fieldmark AI, would be highly beneficial for UK farm security.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say no study has shown that monitoring reduces loss and that they describe an evaluation needed to test this.","excerpt":"No study has yet shown that it reduces loss, and we set out the evaluation needed to show it.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The authors’ case for gate-level monitoring is an inference from evidence gaps, not a demonstrated effect.","The authors report no study showing that monitoring reduces farm losses."],"mediaId":"66d25e68d2449af30ddf7bcfb8cfce63a6aaf49a7584fddf78b8a2f40bfaaec0","correctionReason":null,"id":"47ee31328956f6e766c48e85b4722a487b5e1bd251a7fc297ea0964a5eba0220","publicationId":"6aeb7e72-6261-499f-8aab-bc6b70151f32","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","sourceTitle":"The Case for AI-Enabled Gate Monitoring as Farm Security in the UK: A PRISMA-Guided Review of the Evidence on Rural Crime, Livestock Predation and Farm Access","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-10","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-11T05:01:05.163Z","createdAt":"2026-11-12T02:32:12.042Z","historical":false,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"66d25e68d2449af30ddf7bcfb8cfce63a6aaf49a7584fddf78b8a2f40bfaaec0","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-12T02:31:23.359Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","checkedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["useful_perspective"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v6","mediaId":"66d25e68d2449af30ddf7bcfb8cfce63a6aaf49a7584fddf78b8a2f40bfaaec0","confidence":0.66,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"de081d010d7a4140e2563e4659a10833c086413f684310e5f60249be4094c7b6","decidedAt":"2026-11-12T02:31:24.378Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"ecf54a8529e634e3dba168b507534f791796c9a57b27588044fe541b2a48f003","observationId":"03c262273f42a5e5e33407c82dbc331aa444d49ed7fc8b4210fcd9fec0d92a34","retrievedAt":"2026-11-12T02:31:23.240Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"824b0b26-1daf-4c4c-84a0-3cffe1fda36e"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"249904a9-9193-43f4-8993-1fc58d587421"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-11-12T02:32:12.042Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Symes, Steve","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Fergus, Paul","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Carr, Mark","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"McIver, Omar","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Jones, Arwyn","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Symes, Steve","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Symes, Steve","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"ffd31a3d8009236f13ac2b861a0a63eefde5c1f41809d675701b52e6bb61a9bf:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"ffd31a3d8009236f13ac2b861a0a63eefde5c1f41809d675701b52e6bb61a9bf","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","contentSha256":"ca96573efe82394f944c574dc62eb6268b2eae8ea125f5c09852ee31225aba88","textHash":"ecf54a8529e634e3dba168b507534f791796c9a57b27588044fe541b2a48f003","observedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Fergus, Paul","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Fergus, Paul","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"ffd31a3d8009236f13ac2b861a0a63eefde5c1f41809d675701b52e6bb61a9bf:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"ffd31a3d8009236f13ac2b861a0a63eefde5c1f41809d675701b52e6bb61a9bf","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","contentSha256":"ca96573efe82394f944c574dc62eb6268b2eae8ea125f5c09852ee31225aba88","textHash":"ecf54a8529e634e3dba168b507534f791796c9a57b27588044fe541b2a48f003","observedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Carr, Mark","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Carr, Mark","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"ffd31a3d8009236f13ac2b861a0a63eefde5c1f41809d675701b52e6bb61a9bf:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"ffd31a3d8009236f13ac2b861a0a63eefde5c1f41809d675701b52e6bb61a9bf","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","contentSha256":"ca96573efe82394f944c574dc62eb6268b2eae8ea125f5c09852ee31225aba88","textHash":"ecf54a8529e634e3dba168b507534f791796c9a57b27588044fe541b2a48f003","observedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"McIver, Omar","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"McIver, Omar","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"ffd31a3d8009236f13ac2b861a0a63eefde5c1f41809d675701b52e6bb61a9bf:participation:3","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"ffd31a3d8009236f13ac2b861a0a63eefde5c1f41809d675701b52e6bb61a9bf","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","contentSha256":"ca96573efe82394f944c574dc62eb6268b2eae8ea125f5c09852ee31225aba88","textHash":"ecf54a8529e634e3dba168b507534f791796c9a57b27588044fe541b2a48f003","observedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Jones, Arwyn","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Jones, Arwyn","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"ffd31a3d8009236f13ac2b861a0a63eefde5c1f41809d675701b52e6bb61a9bf:participation:4","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"ffd31a3d8009236f13ac2b861a0a63eefde5c1f41809d675701b52e6bb61a9bf","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","contentSha256":"ca96573efe82394f944c574dc62eb6268b2eae8ea125f5c09852ee31225aba88","textHash":"ecf54a8529e634e3dba168b507534f791796c9a57b27588044fe541b2a48f003","observedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":5,"returned":5,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13933","snapshotId":"ffd31a3d8009236f13ac2b861a0a63eefde5c1f41809d675701b52e6bb61a9bf","contentSha256":"ca96573efe82394f944c574dc62eb6268b2eae8ea125f5c09852ee31225aba88","textHash":"ecf54a8529e634e3dba168b507534f791796c9a57b27588044fe541b2a48f003","observedAt":"2026-11-12T03:36:10.519Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":41,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/47ee31328956f6e766c48e85b4722a487b5e1bd251a7fc297ea0964a5eba0220/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"6aeb7e72-6261-499f-8aab-bc6b70151f32","verdict":"passed","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"Claims and the argument for gate-level monitoring are attributed to the paper's authors throughout. The commercial system named in the source, Fieldmark AI, is kept as the authors' own reference and is not presented as Escape Meridian's view.","excerpt":"Authors:Steve Symes, Paul Fergus, Mark Carr, Omar McIver, Arwyn Jones"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"pass","explanation":"The reading faithfully covers the evidence gaps, the farm-gate testing gap, the 41% vs 81% comparison, the authors' inference-based case and their admission that loss reduction is unshown. The title and question are fair. Minor nuance: the source says monitoring 'would create' records and 'resolve' responsibility, while the draft softens this to 'could' and 'help resolve.' The authors' framing as inference is still preserved. PRISMA can be covered by a tooltip.","excerpt":"It would create the farm-level, time-stamped record that no official source holds, verify events that periodic human checks miss, resolve whether foxes, dogs or people were responsible"},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The originalPublished date of 2026-11-10 matches the arXiv v1 submission date. It is not the later feed date.","excerpt":"[Submitted on 10 Nov 2026]"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"Each claim matches a verbatim source statement. The draft adds no unsupported benefits or costs. The limitations and the question follow directly from the authors' statement that no study shows reduced loss.","excerpt":"No study has yet shown that it reduces loss, and we set out the evaluation needed to show it."},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified link to the arXiv abstract page. This is the direct original source.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-12T02:32:12.042Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}