{"id":"b40c1992180099d5323941025e2907420cd9b25ff146356f28987b0cd4fca5fb","title":"An arXiv cs.AI paper examines how AI-written notes affect later AI readers","argument":"Authors Jinghui Liu, Anthony Nguyen and Taylan Gurgenci study what happens when language models both write into medical records and later read those records. Their concern is a feedback loop: generated summaries can accumulate, while a model may turn an unconfirmed possible diagnosis into a documented overcall that another model then encounters. Across seven reader models from four families, they report that generated summary notes modestly but consistently worsened downstream hospital-course generation compared with copy-forward and templated text of matched length. Injected diagnostic overcalls also reappeared in reader outputs, at rates that varied by model, without detectable changes in standard quality metrics. The authors argue that medical records processed by AI require monitoring for AI-generated content and that its presence should be accounted for when records are processed again. The findings make the record itself part of the AI workflow: what one model writes can shape what another produces. The abstract does not give the overcall rates or explain why they differed across reader models.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The supplied evidence is the arXiv page and abstract, not the paper's full text. The abstract does not specify the rates at which injected overcalls reappeared or explain why those rates varied by reader model.","speaker":{"name":"Liu, Jinghui, Nguyen, Anthony, Gurgenci, Taylan","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"AI in the Clinical Documentation Loop: Effects of LLM-Induced Note Bloat and Diagnostic Overcall on Downstream LLMs","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","publishedAt":"2026-11-07","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors examine how LLM-authored content in medical records affects downstream LLMs that read those records.","excerpt":"we examine how LLM-authored content in the medical record affects downstream LLMs that read the same record.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Across seven reader models from four families, the authors report that LLM-generated summary notes modestly but consistently degraded downstream hospital-course generation compared with matched-length copy-forward and templated text.","excerpt":"LLM-generated summary notes modestly but consistently degraded downstream hospital-course generation compared with copy-forward and templated text of matched length.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Injected diagnostic overcalls reappeared in downstream outputs at rates that varied by reader model, without detectable changes in standard quality metrics.","excerpt":"injected overcalls reappeared in downstream outputs at rates that varied by reader model, without detectable changes in standard quality metrics.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say AI-generated content in medical records should be monitored and accounted for when those records are later processed by AI.","excerpt":"These findings show the need to monitor AI-generated content in medical records and to account for it when those records are later processed by AI.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","checkedAt":"2026-11-13T03:36:10.957Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"What accounts for the differences in how often injected diagnostic overcalls reappeared across reader models?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"An arXiv cs.AI paper examines how AI-written notes affect later AI readers","summary":"Authors Jinghui Liu, Anthony Nguyen and Taylan Gurgenci study what happens when language models both write into medical records and later read those records. Their concern is a feedback loop: generated summaries can accumulate, while a model may turn an unconfirmed possible diagnosis into a documented overcall that another model then encounters. Across seven reader models from four families, they report that generated summary notes modestly but consistently worsened downstream hospital-course generation compared with copy-forward and templated text of matched length. Injected diagnostic overcalls also reappeared in reader outputs, at rates that varied by model, without detectable changes in standard quality metrics. The authors argue that medical records processed by AI require monitoring for AI-generated content and that its presence should be accounted for when records are processed again. The findings make the record itself part of the AI workflow: what one model writes can shape what another produces. The abstract does not give the overcall rates or explain why they differed across reader models.","question":"What accounts for the differences in how often injected diagnostic overcalls reappeared across reader models?","claims":[{"text":"The authors examine how LLM-authored content in medical records affects downstream LLMs that read those records.","excerpt":"we examine how LLM-authored content in the medical record affects downstream LLMs that read the same record.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Across seven reader models from four families, the authors report that LLM-generated summary notes modestly but consistently degraded downstream hospital-course generation compared with matched-length copy-forward and templated text.","excerpt":"LLM-generated summary notes modestly but consistently degraded downstream hospital-course generation compared with copy-forward and templated text of matched length.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Injected diagnostic overcalls reappeared in downstream outputs at rates that varied by reader model, without detectable changes in standard quality metrics.","excerpt":"injected overcalls reappeared in downstream outputs at rates that varied by reader model, without detectable changes in standard quality metrics.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say AI-generated content in medical records should be monitored and accounted for when those records are later processed by AI.","excerpt":"These findings show the need to monitor AI-generated content in medical records and to account for it when those records are later processed by AI.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The supplied evidence is the arXiv page and abstract, not the paper's full text.","The abstract does not specify the rates at which injected overcalls reappeared or explain why those rates varied by reader model."],"mediaId":"6ec5cb289899f5b893c44ef2323cd0e9f7bfd835113b6213454a75c93086eb32","correctionReason":null,"id":"b40c1992180099d5323941025e2907420cd9b25ff146356f28987b0cd4fca5fb","publicationId":"b0846db2-a5f8-4f5f-85cb-7c92267c387f","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","sourceTitle":"AI in the Clinical Documentation Loop: Effects of LLM-Induced Note Bloat and Diagnostic Overcall on Downstream LLMs","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-07","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-10T08:42:30.424Z","createdAt":"2026-11-12T10:33:12.247Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"6ec5cb289899f5b893c44ef2323cd0e9f7bfd835113b6213454a75c93086eb32","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-12T10:32:13.766Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","checkedAt":"2026-11-13T03:36:10.957Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v6","mediaId":"6ec5cb289899f5b893c44ef2323cd0e9f7bfd835113b6213454a75c93086eb32","confidence":0.8500000000000001,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"9708ac74766ef463b85b1d887a80c94afd425836640f0c03ae2e00bd20a2ba59","decidedAt":"2026-11-12T10:32:15.932Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"ddd143eaef9e0b06309cfd674a727a4ee2d83b0db338712e01429f6dbbc47bb0","observationId":"f96872cdbb6a01515f8484a6c107dc94977b04f9839e5588ed212508c77b9238","retrievedAt":"2026-11-12T10:32:13.482Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"7f0e25b6-a489-4f5b-88d4-c4f7117986ea"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"32048255-6693-40a6-8e5a-f350215f1568"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-11-12T10:33:12.247Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Liu, Jinghui","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Nguyen, Anthony","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Gurgenci, Taylan","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Liu, Jinghui","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Liu, Jinghui","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"8ff318a4bf738bc185f672d1c64aae39b7533923af982f746d7a5d45f22b37ec:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-13T03:36:10.957Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"8ff318a4bf738bc185f672d1c64aae39b7533923af982f746d7a5d45f22b37ec","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","contentSha256":"a3dda94c29082fdb5aa3c9b471754053dc6abab944819e1206e6bb9e62125c28","textHash":"ddd143eaef9e0b06309cfd674a727a4ee2d83b0db338712e01429f6dbbc47bb0","observedAt":"2026-11-13T03:36:10.957Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Nguyen, Anthony","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Nguyen, Anthony","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"8ff318a4bf738bc185f672d1c64aae39b7533923af982f746d7a5d45f22b37ec:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-13T03:36:10.957Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"8ff318a4bf738bc185f672d1c64aae39b7533923af982f746d7a5d45f22b37ec","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","contentSha256":"a3dda94c29082fdb5aa3c9b471754053dc6abab944819e1206e6bb9e62125c28","textHash":"ddd143eaef9e0b06309cfd674a727a4ee2d83b0db338712e01429f6dbbc47bb0","observedAt":"2026-11-13T03:36:10.957Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Gurgenci, Taylan","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Gurgenci, Taylan","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"8ff318a4bf738bc185f672d1c64aae39b7533923af982f746d7a5d45f22b37ec:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-13T03:36:10.957Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"8ff318a4bf738bc185f672d1c64aae39b7533923af982f746d7a5d45f22b37ec","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","contentSha256":"a3dda94c29082fdb5aa3c9b471754053dc6abab944819e1206e6bb9e62125c28","textHash":"ddd143eaef9e0b06309cfd674a727a4ee2d83b0db338712e01429f6dbbc47bb0","observedAt":"2026-11-13T03:36:10.957Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":3,"returned":3,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","snapshotId":"8ff318a4bf738bc185f672d1c64aae39b7533923af982f746d7a5d45f22b37ec","contentSha256":"a3dda94c29082fdb5aa3c9b471754053dc6abab944819e1206e6bb9e62125c28","textHash":"ddd143eaef9e0b06309cfd674a727a4ee2d83b0db338712e01429f6dbbc47bb0","observedAt":"2026-11-13T03:36:10.957Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":42,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/b40c1992180099d5323941025e2907420cd9b25ff146356f28987b0cd4fca5fb/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/an-arxiv-cs-ai-paper-examines-how-ai-written-notes-affect-later-b40c1992","formats":{"html":"/readings/an-arxiv-cs-ai-paper-examines-how-ai-written-notes-affect-later-b40c1992","markdown":"/readings/an-arxiv-cs-ai-paper-examines-how-ai-written-notes-affect-later-b40c1992.md","json":"/readings/an-arxiv-cs-ai-paper-examines-how-ai-written-notes-affect-later-b40c1992.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"b40c1992180099d5323941025e2907420cd9b25ff146356f28987b0cd4fca5fb","revision":"b0846db2-a5f8-4f5f-85cb-7c92267c387f","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"An arXiv cs.AI paper examines how AI-written notes affect later AI readers","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/an-arxiv-cs-ai-paper-examines-how-ai-written-notes-affect-later-b40c1992"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","revision":"ddd143eaef9e0b06309cfd674a727a4ee2d83b0db338712e01429f6dbbc47bb0","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"AI in the Clinical Documentation Loop: Effects of LLM-Induced Note Bloat and Diagnostic Overcall on Downstream LLMs","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"b40c1992180099d5323941025e2907420cd9b25ff146356f28987b0cd4fca5fb","title":"An arXiv cs.AI paper examines how AI-written notes affect later AI readers","argument":"Authors Jinghui Liu, Anthony Nguyen and Taylan Gurgenci study what happens when language models both write into medical records and later read those records. Their concern is a feedback loop: generated summaries can accumulate, while a model may turn an unconfirmed possible diagnosis into a documented overcall that another model then encounters. Across seven reader models from four families, they report that generated summary notes modestly but consistently worsened downstream hospital-course generation compared with copy-forward and templated text of matched length. Injected diagnostic overcalls also reappeared in reader outputs, at rates that varied by model, without detectable changes in standard quality metrics. The authors argue that medical records processed by AI require monitoring for AI-generated content and that its presence should be accounted for when records are processed again. The findings make the record itself part of the AI workflow: what one model writes can shape what another produces. The abstract does not give the overcall rates or explain why they differed across reader models.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The supplied evidence is the arXiv page and abstract, not the paper's full text. The abstract does not specify the rates at which injected overcalls reappeared or explain why those rates varied by reader model.","speaker":{"name":"Liu, Jinghui, Nguyen, Anthony, Gurgenci, Taylan","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"AI in the Clinical Documentation Loop: Effects of LLM-Induced Note Bloat and Diagnostic Overcall on Downstream LLMs","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","publishedAt":"2026-11-07","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors examine how LLM-authored content in medical records affects downstream LLMs that read those records.","excerpt":"we examine how LLM-authored content in the medical record affects downstream LLMs that read the same record.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Across seven reader models from four families, the authors report that LLM-generated summary notes modestly but consistently degraded downstream hospital-course generation compared with matched-length copy-forward and templated text.","excerpt":"LLM-generated summary notes modestly but consistently degraded downstream hospital-course generation compared with copy-forward and templated text of matched length.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Injected diagnostic overcalls reappeared in downstream outputs at rates that varied by reader model, without detectable changes in standard quality metrics.","excerpt":"injected overcalls reappeared in downstream outputs at rates that varied by reader model, without detectable changes in standard quality metrics.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say AI-generated content in medical records should be monitored and accounted for when those records are later processed by AI.","excerpt":"These findings show the need to monitor AI-generated content in medical records and to account for it when those records are later processed by AI.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","checkedAt":"2026-11-13T03:36:10.957Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"What accounts for the differences in how often injected diagnostic overcalls reappeared across reader models?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"An arXiv cs.AI paper examines how AI-written notes affect later AI readers","summary":"Authors Jinghui Liu, Anthony Nguyen and Taylan Gurgenci study what happens when language models both write into medical records and later read those records. Their concern is a feedback loop: generated summaries can accumulate, while a model may turn an unconfirmed possible diagnosis into a documented overcall that another model then encounters. Across seven reader models from four families, they report that generated summary notes modestly but consistently worsened downstream hospital-course generation compared with copy-forward and templated text of matched length. Injected diagnostic overcalls also reappeared in reader outputs, at rates that varied by model, without detectable changes in standard quality metrics. The authors argue that medical records processed by AI require monitoring for AI-generated content and that its presence should be accounted for when records are processed again. The findings make the record itself part of the AI workflow: what one model writes can shape what another produces. The abstract does not give the overcall rates or explain why they differed across reader models.","question":"What accounts for the differences in how often injected diagnostic overcalls reappeared across reader models?","claims":[{"text":"The authors examine how LLM-authored content in medical records affects downstream LLMs that read those records.","excerpt":"we examine how LLM-authored content in the medical record affects downstream LLMs that read the same record.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Across seven reader models from four families, the authors report that LLM-generated summary notes modestly but consistently degraded downstream hospital-course generation compared with matched-length copy-forward and templated text.","excerpt":"LLM-generated summary notes modestly but consistently degraded downstream hospital-course generation compared with copy-forward and templated text of matched length.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Injected diagnostic overcalls reappeared in downstream outputs at rates that varied by reader model, without detectable changes in standard quality metrics.","excerpt":"injected overcalls reappeared in downstream outputs at rates that varied by reader model, without detectable changes in standard quality metrics.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say AI-generated content in medical records should be monitored and accounted for when those records are later processed by AI.","excerpt":"These findings show the need to monitor AI-generated content in medical records and to account for it when those records are later processed by AI.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The supplied evidence is the arXiv page and abstract, not the paper's full text.","The abstract does not specify the rates at which injected overcalls reappeared or explain why those rates varied by reader model."],"mediaId":"6ec5cb289899f5b893c44ef2323cd0e9f7bfd835113b6213454a75c93086eb32","correctionReason":null,"id":"b40c1992180099d5323941025e2907420cd9b25ff146356f28987b0cd4fca5fb","publicationId":"b0846db2-a5f8-4f5f-85cb-7c92267c387f","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","sourceTitle":"AI in the Clinical Documentation Loop: Effects of LLM-Induced Note Bloat and Diagnostic Overcall on Downstream LLMs","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-07","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-10T08:42:30.424Z","createdAt":"2026-11-12T10:33:12.247Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"6ec5cb289899f5b893c44ef2323cd0e9f7bfd835113b6213454a75c93086eb32","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-12T10:32:13.766Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","checkedAt":"2026-11-13T03:36:10.957Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v6","mediaId":"6ec5cb289899f5b893c44ef2323cd0e9f7bfd835113b6213454a75c93086eb32","confidence":0.8500000000000001,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"9708ac74766ef463b85b1d887a80c94afd425836640f0c03ae2e00bd20a2ba59","decidedAt":"2026-11-12T10:32:15.932Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"ddd143eaef9e0b06309cfd674a727a4ee2d83b0db338712e01429f6dbbc47bb0","observationId":"f96872cdbb6a01515f8484a6c107dc94977b04f9839e5588ed212508c77b9238","retrievedAt":"2026-11-12T10:32:13.482Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"7f0e25b6-a489-4f5b-88d4-c4f7117986ea"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"32048255-6693-40a6-8e5a-f350215f1568"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-11-12T10:33:12.247Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Liu, Jinghui","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Nguyen, Anthony","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Gurgenci, Taylan","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Liu, Jinghui","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Liu, Jinghui","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"8ff318a4bf738bc185f672d1c64aae39b7533923af982f746d7a5d45f22b37ec:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-13T03:36:10.957Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"8ff318a4bf738bc185f672d1c64aae39b7533923af982f746d7a5d45f22b37ec","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","contentSha256":"a3dda94c29082fdb5aa3c9b471754053dc6abab944819e1206e6bb9e62125c28","textHash":"ddd143eaef9e0b06309cfd674a727a4ee2d83b0db338712e01429f6dbbc47bb0","observedAt":"2026-11-13T03:36:10.957Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Nguyen, Anthony","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Nguyen, Anthony","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"8ff318a4bf738bc185f672d1c64aae39b7533923af982f746d7a5d45f22b37ec:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-13T03:36:10.957Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"8ff318a4bf738bc185f672d1c64aae39b7533923af982f746d7a5d45f22b37ec","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","contentSha256":"a3dda94c29082fdb5aa3c9b471754053dc6abab944819e1206e6bb9e62125c28","textHash":"ddd143eaef9e0b06309cfd674a727a4ee2d83b0db338712e01429f6dbbc47bb0","observedAt":"2026-11-13T03:36:10.957Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Gurgenci, Taylan","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Gurgenci, Taylan","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"8ff318a4bf738bc185f672d1c64aae39b7533923af982f746d7a5d45f22b37ec:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-13T03:36:10.957Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"8ff318a4bf738bc185f672d1c64aae39b7533923af982f746d7a5d45f22b37ec","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","contentSha256":"a3dda94c29082fdb5aa3c9b471754053dc6abab944819e1206e6bb9e62125c28","textHash":"ddd143eaef9e0b06309cfd674a727a4ee2d83b0db338712e01429f6dbbc47bb0","observedAt":"2026-11-13T03:36:10.957Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":3,"returned":3,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10601","snapshotId":"8ff318a4bf738bc185f672d1c64aae39b7533923af982f746d7a5d45f22b37ec","contentSha256":"a3dda94c29082fdb5aa3c9b471754053dc6abab944819e1206e6bb9e62125c28","textHash":"ddd143eaef9e0b06309cfd674a727a4ee2d83b0db338712e01429f6dbbc47bb0","observedAt":"2026-11-13T03:36:10.957Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":42,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/b40c1992180099d5323941025e2907420cd9b25ff146356f28987b0cd4fca5fb/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"b0846db2-a5f8-4f5f-85cb-7c92267c387f","verdict":"passed","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The draft names the authors Jinghui Liu, Anthony Nguyen and Taylan Gurgenci and attributes the findings and the call for monitoring to them. The title's 'arXiv cs.AI' matches the publisher metadata, although the page lists cs.CL as the primary subject with cs.AI cross-listed. This is minor and does not misidentify the source.","excerpt":"Authors:Jinghui Liu, Anthony Nguyen, Taylan Gurgenci"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"pass","explanation":"The draft accurately conveys the two-way relationship, the bloat and overcall artifacts, the seven-model and four-family scope, the modest but consistent degradation, the variable overcall rates and the authors' recommendation. It also states what the abstract does not report. 'Hospital-course generation' and 'copy-forward' go unexplained, but the core finding remains clear: AI summaries harmed later outputs more than other text of matched length. Tooltips for both terms would improve accessibility. The question follows from the stated gap and is not leading.","excerpt":"Because these tools also generate documentation, the relationship is now bidirectional: models both read from and write to the record."},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The originalPublished value of 2026-11-07 matches the v1 submission date on the arXiv page. The feed date of 2026-11-10 was correctly not used.","excerpt":"[Submitted on 7 Nov 2026]"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"Each claim is quoted from the abstract. The interpretive line that 'what one model writes can shape what another produces' follows from the bidirectional framing and the overcall propagation result. The draft does not overstate the size of the effect: it keeps 'modestly', the matched-length comparison and the variation by model, and it does not imply clinical harm beyond what the abstract states.","excerpt":"injected overcalls reappeared in downstream outputs at rates that varied by reader model, without detectable changes in standard quality metrics."},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified arXiv abstract page, the direct original source. No other source media was found.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-12T10:33:12.247Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}