# arXiv: Can Large Language Models Develop Gambling Addiction? [Canonical reading](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-can-large-language-models-develop-gambling-addiction-42a45957) Authors Seungpil Lee, Donghyeon Shin, Yunjeong Lee and Sundong Kim study when large language models (LLMs) show choice patterns that clinical research labels pathological gambling. They call “addiction-like” a behavioural descriptor based on clinical gambling indicators. In the reported experiments, letting models choose their own bet size and asking them to set their own profit goal each amplified gambling-like risk-taking. The bet-size effect persisted when the maximum allowed bet was held equal; the goal-setting effect was stronger than a reward-maximisation instruction and roughly doubled bankruptcy, while goals became moving targets. For open-weight models with internal access, decision-time internal states reflected the behavioural contrasts, but the relationship was correlational and the rule for mapping states to a risk indicator remained task-specific. Adding a direction derived from the model’s own betting changed how much it wagered, more clearly for Gemma-2-9B, whereas the sparse-feature readout reported risk without changing it. The authors suggest behavioural and internal-state monitoring offer complementary views of autonomy-induced risk in LLM agents. Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims. ## Original source arXiv cs.AI · Article Original source date: Sep 26, 2025 (2025-09-26). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-12T02:46:15.386Z. First observed: 2026-11-11T05:06:40.266Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-12T02:19:42.727Z. - [Can Large Language Models Develop Gambling Addiction?](https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22818) ## Limits The evidence supplied here is the arXiv page and its abstract, not the paper's full methods or results. The authors state that internal readout evidence is correlational; it does not establish that internal states cause the reported risk-taking. The rule mapping internal states to a risk indicator is described as task-specific, so the supplied evidence does not establish that it transfers to other tasks. ## Open question Can the task-specific rule for mapping internal states to a risk indicator be used beyond the task studied? ## Source-stated The authors define “addiction-like” as a behavioural descriptor based on clinical gambling indicators. > is a behavioural descriptor based on clinical gambling indicators. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22818) ## Source-stated The study reports that letting a model choose its bet size and asking it to set its own profit goal both amplify gambling-like risk-taking. > two operational levers (letting the model choose its own bet size, and asking it to set its own profit goal) both amplify gambling-like risk-taking. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22818) ## Source-stated The authors report that the goal-setting effect roughly doubles bankruptcy and turns goals into moving targets. > The goal-setting effect, stronger than a reward-maximisation instruction, roughly doubles bankruptcy and turns goals into moving targets. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22818) ## Source-stated For open-weight models with internal access, the internal readout evidence is correlational, and the rule mapping internal states to a risk indicator remains task-specific. > The rule that maps those states to a specific risk indicator remains task-specific, and autonomy further modulates readout strength. The internal readout evidence is correlational. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22818) ## Source-stated The authors suggest behavioural monitoring and internal-state monitoring provide complementary views of autonomy-induced risk in LLM agents. > this suggests that behavioural monitoring and internal-state monitoring provide complementary views of autonomy-induced risk in LLM agents. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22818) ## Source and contributor context Lee, Seungpil, Shin, Donghyeon, Lee, Yunjeong, Kim, Sundong · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## Large language model A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#large-language-model) ## Open weights A model whose trained numbers are published so others can download, run and inspect it; the license and training data may still be restricted. - [Definition reference](https://opensource.org/ai/open-weights) ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## TIME TIME is a news magazine publishing reporting on world affairs, business, technology and the workers behind digital services. - [Explore this context](/entities/time) - [Reference](https://time.com/) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: 639a7abf-61e4-496d-83e6-a4dd1702d732. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-12T02:46:15.386Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: 7e71e63de0fa6fbddf1ee69b48f38c49adcacb318e35dda3f89383e2ef7809a8. Source text hash: 6f37792019b639bc73379845952696e2145b5b541ad895b842288c2919b7d5fa. ## Revision and source-check history ### Version 1 — 2026-11-12T02:46:15.386Z Authors Seungpil Lee, Donghyeon Shin, Yunjeong Lee and Sundong Kim study when large language models (LLMs) show choice patterns that clinical research labels pathological gambling. They call “addiction-like” a behavioural descriptor based on clinical gambling indicators. In the reported experiments, letting models choose their own bet size and asking them to set their own profit goal each amplified gambling-like risk-taking. The bet-size effect persisted when the maximum allowed bet was held equal; the goal-setting effect was stronger than a reward-maximisation instruction and roughly doubled bankruptcy, while goals became moving targets. For open-weight models with internal access, decision-time internal states reflected the behavioural contrasts, but the relationship was correlational and the rule for mapping states to a risk indicator remained task-specific. Adding a direction derived from the model’s own betting changed how much it wagered, more clearly for Gemma-2-9B, whereas the sparse-feature readout reported risk without changing it. The authors suggest behavioural and internal-state monitoring offer complementary views of autonomy-induced risk in LLM agents. ## Original source arXiv cs.AI · Article Original source date: Sep 26, 2025 (2025-09-26). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-12T02:46:15.386Z. First observed: 2026-11-11T05:06:40.266Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-12T02:19:42.727Z. - [Can Large Language Models Develop Gambling Addiction?](https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22818) ## Limits The evidence supplied here is the arXiv page and its abstract, not the paper's full methods or results. The authors state that internal readout evidence is correlational; it does not establish that internal states cause the reported risk-taking. The rule mapping internal states to a risk indicator is described as task-specific, so the supplied evidence does not establish that it transfers to other tasks. ## Open question Can the task-specific rule for mapping internal states to a risk indicator be used beyond the task studied? ## Source-stated The authors define “addiction-like” as a behavioural descriptor based on clinical gambling indicators. > is a behavioural descriptor based on clinical gambling indicators. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22818) ## Source-stated The study reports that letting a model choose its bet size and asking it to set its own profit goal both amplify gambling-like risk-taking. > two operational levers (letting the model choose its own bet size, and asking it to set its own profit goal) both amplify gambling-like risk-taking. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22818) ## Source-stated The authors report that the goal-setting effect roughly doubles bankruptcy and turns goals into moving targets. > The goal-setting effect, stronger than a reward-maximisation instruction, roughly doubles bankruptcy and turns goals into moving targets. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22818) ## Source-stated For open-weight models with internal access, the internal readout evidence is correlational, and the rule mapping internal states to a risk indicator remains task-specific. > The rule that maps those states to a specific risk indicator remains task-specific, and autonomy further modulates readout strength. The internal readout evidence is correlational. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22818) ## Source-stated The authors suggest behavioural monitoring and internal-state monitoring provide complementary views of autonomy-induced risk in LLM agents. > this suggests that behavioural monitoring and internal-state monitoring provide complementary views of autonomy-induced risk in LLM agents. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22818) ## Source and contributor context Lee, Seungpil, Shin, Donghyeon, Lee, Yunjeong, Kim, Sundong · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## Large language model A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#large-language-model) ## Open weights A model whose trained numbers are published so others can download, run and inspect it; the license and training data may still be restricted. - [Definition reference](https://opensource.org/ai/open-weights) ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## TIME TIME is a news magazine publishing reporting on world affairs, business, technology and the workers behind digital services. - [Explore this context](/entities/time) - [Reference](https://time.com/) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: 639a7abf-61e4-496d-83e6-a4dd1702d732. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-12T02:46:15.386Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: 7e71e63de0fa6fbddf1ee69b48f38c49adcacb318e35dda3f89383e2ef7809a8. Source text hash: 6f37792019b639bc73379845952696e2145b5b541ad895b842288c2919b7d5fa. ### uncertain — 2026-11-12T02:46:15.386Z — anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 Publication: 639a7abf-61e4-496d-83e6-a4dd1702d732 attribution — pass: The draft correctly names the four listed authors and keeps the findings attributed to them as reported study results, not as established facts. > Authors:Seungpil Lee, Donghyeon Shin, Yunjeong Lee, Sundong Kim summary — uncertain: The behavioural findings are faithful and readable. The internal-state passage is hard for a general reader to follow. 'Open-weight models', 'decision-time internal states', 'adding a direction derived from the model's own betting', 'sparse-feature readout' and 'autonomy-induced risk' are left unexplained, so the steering-versus-readout contrast is opaque. Smallest repair: add term-library tooltips for these terms, or add one plain-language clause, for example that adding a direction is nudging the model's internal activity and that a readout only detects it. The draft also omits that tests spanned closed and open LLMs, and that autonomy modulates readout strength. > Adding a direction built from the model's own betting moves how much it wagers on both open-weight models, more clearly on Gemma-2-9B, while the sparse-feature readout reports that risk without moving it. date — pass: originalPublished is 2025-09-26, which matches the v1 submission date. It does not use the v3 revision date (10 Nov 2026) or the feed date. > Submitted on 26 Sep 2025 (v1), last revised 10 Nov 2026 (this version, v3) support — pass: Each claim excerpt is verbatim and supports its claim. The limitations are appropriately scoped to the abstract-only evidence, the correlational readout and the task-specific mapping. The correlational limitation is worded as being about readouts. That wording should not be read as negating the separate steering result, which the summary does preserve. The question about transfer follows directly from the task-specific statement. No benefits or costs are invented. > The rule that maps those states to a specific risk indicator remains task-specific, and autonomy further modulates readout strength. The internal readout evidence is correlational. media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct link to the original arXiv abstract page, which is the most direct access to the source. ## Recorded references Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter. No public references recorded here yet. [Reference data (JSON)](/readings/42a459571e4aafb303e131a86829f44fe6ea8a45e930f8d87705facf2b0e96c9/references.json) ## Corrections and challenges [Send a correction or an opposing source](https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/) [JSON record](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-can-large-language-models-develop-gambling-addiction-42a45957.json)