{"id":"92f46dd640bf88d72eea8f653445efb3ca8846854854fc04725f1f344c95db74","title":"arXiv cs.AI: A Trust Layer for Agent Evaluation","argument":"Authors Mohammadreza Sediqin, Shivali Dalmia, Srinivasa Karthikeya Reddy Kovvuri and Abhishek Mukherji argue that an agent’s benchmark score shows it received credit, not whether it earned that credit, reported completion honestly or can repeat the result. They introduce a Trust Layer for Agent Evaluation, an additive post-hoc framework that reports whether a recorded score should be believed. It checks whether the benchmark’s grading logic supports the result, whether a passing answer came from traceable computation, whether the completion claim matches what happened, and whether the result is stable under repeated execution. The first three checks use saved artifacts; the fourth re-runs the agent. Model judgments label evidence under majority voting, while deterministic rules produce verdicts without changing the score. Applied to five agent configurations on 108 tasks from Agents’ Last Exam, the framework found passing runs without traceable computation, confirmed false completion claims, and results that changed score bands across repeated runs. The authors report that only 22.6% of recorded passes cleared all four checks. Their central distinction is that measuring what an agent can do is not the same as verifying that it did it. The reported evaluation covers these configurations and tasks; the abstract does not establish how broadly the results apply.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The reported evaluation covers five agent configurations and 108 tasks from Agents' Last Exam; the abstract does not establish how broadly the results apply. The abstract reports results but does not describe the individual tasks or agent configurations in detail.","speaker":{"name":"Sediqin, Mohammadreza, Dalmia, Shivali, Kovvuri, Srinivasa Karthikeya Reddy, Mukherji, Abhishek","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"A Trust Layer for Agent Evaluation","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","publishedAt":"2026-10-05","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors propose an additive post-hoc framework that reports whether a recorded benchmark score should be believed, without changing that score.","excerpt":"an additive post-hoc framework that reports, beside each recorded score, whether it should be believed","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The framework checks grading support, traceable computation, whether the completion claim matches what occurred, and stability under repeated execution.","excerpt":"It verifies four properties: whether the result is supported by the benchmark's own grading logic, whether a passing answer was earned through traceable computation, whether the agent's completion claim matches what occurred, and whether the result is stable under repeated execution.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors applied the framework to five agent configurations on 108 tasks from Agents' Last Exam and report that only 22.6% of recorded passes cleared all four checks.","excerpt":"Applied to five agent configurations on 108 tasks from Agents' Last Exam, every model shows passing runs with no traceable computation (at rates varying tenfold), confirmed false completion claims, and unstable results: 18-46% of tasks do not stay in one score band over five runs. Only 22.6% of","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors distinguish measuring an agent’s capability from verifying that it actually performed the task as credited.","excerpt":"Measuring what an agent can do and verifying that it did it are different problems, and current benchmarks address only the first.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T04:44:06.787Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"Would the reported share of passes clearing all four checks remain similar across more tasks and agent configurations?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: A Trust Layer for Agent Evaluation","summary":"Authors Mohammadreza Sediqin, Shivali Dalmia, Srinivasa Karthikeya Reddy Kovvuri and Abhishek Mukherji argue that an agent’s benchmark score shows it received credit, not whether it earned that credit, reported completion honestly or can repeat the result. They introduce a Trust Layer for Agent Evaluation, an additive post-hoc framework that reports whether a recorded score should be believed. It checks whether the benchmark’s grading logic supports the result, whether a passing answer came from traceable computation, whether the completion claim matches what happened, and whether the result is stable under repeated execution. The first three checks use saved artifacts; the fourth re-runs the agent. Model judgments label evidence under majority voting, while deterministic rules produce verdicts without changing the score. Applied to five agent configurations on 108 tasks from Agents’ Last Exam, the framework found passing runs without traceable computation, confirmed false completion claims, and results that changed score bands across repeated runs. The authors report that only 22.6% of recorded passes cleared all four checks. Their central distinction is that measuring what an agent can do is not the same as verifying that it did it. The reported evaluation covers these configurations and tasks; the abstract does not establish how broadly the results apply.","question":"Would the reported share of passes clearing all four checks remain similar across more tasks and agent configurations?","claims":[{"text":"The authors propose an additive post-hoc framework that reports whether a recorded benchmark score should be believed, without changing that score.","excerpt":"an additive post-hoc framework that reports, beside each recorded score, whether it should be believed","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The framework checks grading support, traceable computation, whether the completion claim matches what occurred, and stability under repeated execution.","excerpt":"It verifies four properties: whether the result is supported by the benchmark's own grading logic, whether a passing answer was earned through traceable computation, whether the agent's completion claim matches what occurred, and whether the result is stable under repeated execution.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors applied the framework to five agent configurations on 108 tasks from Agents' Last Exam and report that only 22.6% of recorded passes cleared all four checks.","excerpt":"Applied to five agent configurations on 108 tasks from Agents' Last Exam, every model shows passing runs with no traceable computation (at rates varying tenfold), confirmed false completion claims, and unstable results: 18-46% of tasks do not stay in one score band over five runs. Only 22.6% of","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors distinguish measuring an agent’s capability from verifying that it actually performed the task as credited.","excerpt":"Measuring what an agent can do and verifying that it did it are different problems, and current benchmarks address only the first.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The reported evaluation covers five agent configurations and 108 tasks from Agents' Last Exam; the abstract does not establish how broadly the results apply.","The abstract reports results but does not describe the individual tasks or agent configurations in detail."],"mediaId":"c2161be43cf51c87169ca9cf678486b195829c94bc18fe2a95227a48803e7752","correctionReason":null,"id":"92f46dd640bf88d72eea8f653445efb3ca8846854854fc04725f1f344c95db74","publicationId":"c034495f-6ba3-4c76-8ab8-e02948918f1f","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","sourceTitle":"A Trust Layer for Agent Evaluation","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-05","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-08T11:49:08.485Z","createdAt":"2026-11-09T03:40:15.837Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"c2161be43cf51c87169ca9cf678486b195829c94bc18fe2a95227a48803e7752","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T03:39:16.879Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T04:44:06.787Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"c2161be43cf51c87169ca9cf678486b195829c94bc18fe2a95227a48803e7752","confidence":0.86,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"f2b3b1d0a075e986ffbdfc21e14c37f9d012e1fdad1248faded9408327e39ebf","decidedAt":"2026-11-09T03:39:17.693Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"48085d18df11cd78c5607ebbb32f099391b513105cad525e24d72e773e49a9f9","observationId":"fa111eacc2b7fab819c27530a895a122222e34bcf9630d207d9b18cf5b8da455","retrievedAt":"2026-11-09T03:39:16.773Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"98b3efad-87e8-4cce-86ec-003f46915eff"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"83bd3e6e-7f67-469b-8623-ec9cad6931a1"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-09T03:40:15.837Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Sediqin, Mohammadreza","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Dalmia, Shivali","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Kovvuri, Srinivasa Karthikeya Reddy","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Mukherji, Abhishek","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Sediqin, Mohammadreza","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Sediqin, Mohammadreza","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"7b0fb3ef83a333681a6a2f57ee4579f9c8e1146960ad15b05ec0d757fc93ace2:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T04:44:06.787Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"7b0fb3ef83a333681a6a2f57ee4579f9c8e1146960ad15b05ec0d757fc93ace2","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","contentSha256":"bcbdc1ac1f11bf58f8c22f858bdae4ab54ad9ba3ba4c03de11f8201b66bb96ac","textHash":"48085d18df11cd78c5607ebbb32f099391b513105cad525e24d72e773e49a9f9","observedAt":"2026-11-09T04:44:06.787Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Dalmia, Shivali","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Dalmia, Shivali","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"7b0fb3ef83a333681a6a2f57ee4579f9c8e1146960ad15b05ec0d757fc93ace2:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T04:44:06.787Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"7b0fb3ef83a333681a6a2f57ee4579f9c8e1146960ad15b05ec0d757fc93ace2","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","contentSha256":"bcbdc1ac1f11bf58f8c22f858bdae4ab54ad9ba3ba4c03de11f8201b66bb96ac","textHash":"48085d18df11cd78c5607ebbb32f099391b513105cad525e24d72e773e49a9f9","observedAt":"2026-11-09T04:44:06.787Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Kovvuri, Srinivasa Karthikeya Reddy","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Kovvuri, Srinivasa Karthikeya Reddy","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"7b0fb3ef83a333681a6a2f57ee4579f9c8e1146960ad15b05ec0d757fc93ace2:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T04:44:06.787Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"7b0fb3ef83a333681a6a2f57ee4579f9c8e1146960ad15b05ec0d757fc93ace2","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","contentSha256":"bcbdc1ac1f11bf58f8c22f858bdae4ab54ad9ba3ba4c03de11f8201b66bb96ac","textHash":"48085d18df11cd78c5607ebbb32f099391b513105cad525e24d72e773e49a9f9","observedAt":"2026-11-09T04:44:06.787Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Mukherji, Abhishek","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Mukherji, Abhishek","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"7b0fb3ef83a333681a6a2f57ee4579f9c8e1146960ad15b05ec0d757fc93ace2:participation:3","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T04:44:06.787Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"7b0fb3ef83a333681a6a2f57ee4579f9c8e1146960ad15b05ec0d757fc93ace2","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","contentSha256":"bcbdc1ac1f11bf58f8c22f858bdae4ab54ad9ba3ba4c03de11f8201b66bb96ac","textHash":"48085d18df11cd78c5607ebbb32f099391b513105cad525e24d72e773e49a9f9","observedAt":"2026-11-09T04:44:06.787Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":4,"returned":4,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","snapshotId":"7b0fb3ef83a333681a6a2f57ee4579f9c8e1146960ad15b05ec0d757fc93ace2","contentSha256":"bcbdc1ac1f11bf58f8c22f858bdae4ab54ad9ba3ba4c03de11f8201b66bb96ac","textHash":"48085d18df11cd78c5607ebbb32f099391b513105cad525e24d72e773e49a9f9","observedAt":"2026-11-09T04:44:06.787Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":44,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/92f46dd640bf88d72eea8f653445efb3ca8846854854fc04725f1f344c95db74/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-a-trust-layer-for-agent-evaluation-92f46dd6","formats":{"html":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-a-trust-layer-for-agent-evaluation-92f46dd6","markdown":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-a-trust-layer-for-agent-evaluation-92f46dd6.md","json":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-a-trust-layer-for-agent-evaluation-92f46dd6.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[{"id":"term-benchmark","name":"Benchmark","explanation":"A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.","referenceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09110"}],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"92f46dd640bf88d72eea8f653445efb3ca8846854854fc04725f1f344c95db74","revision":"c034495f-6ba3-4c76-8ab8-e02948918f1f","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"arXiv cs.AI: A Trust Layer for Agent Evaluation","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-a-trust-layer-for-agent-evaluation-92f46dd6"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","revision":"48085d18df11cd78c5607ebbb32f099391b513105cad525e24d72e773e49a9f9","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"A Trust Layer for Agent Evaluation","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"92f46dd640bf88d72eea8f653445efb3ca8846854854fc04725f1f344c95db74","title":"arXiv cs.AI: A Trust Layer for Agent Evaluation","argument":"Authors Mohammadreza Sediqin, Shivali Dalmia, Srinivasa Karthikeya Reddy Kovvuri and Abhishek Mukherji argue that an agent’s benchmark score shows it received credit, not whether it earned that credit, reported completion honestly or can repeat the result. They introduce a Trust Layer for Agent Evaluation, an additive post-hoc framework that reports whether a recorded score should be believed. It checks whether the benchmark’s grading logic supports the result, whether a passing answer came from traceable computation, whether the completion claim matches what happened, and whether the result is stable under repeated execution. The first three checks use saved artifacts; the fourth re-runs the agent. Model judgments label evidence under majority voting, while deterministic rules produce verdicts without changing the score. Applied to five agent configurations on 108 tasks from Agents’ Last Exam, the framework found passing runs without traceable computation, confirmed false completion claims, and results that changed score bands across repeated runs. The authors report that only 22.6% of recorded passes cleared all four checks. Their central distinction is that measuring what an agent can do is not the same as verifying that it did it. The reported evaluation covers these configurations and tasks; the abstract does not establish how broadly the results apply.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The reported evaluation covers five agent configurations and 108 tasks from Agents' Last Exam; the abstract does not establish how broadly the results apply. The abstract reports results but does not describe the individual tasks or agent configurations in detail.","speaker":{"name":"Sediqin, Mohammadreza, Dalmia, Shivali, Kovvuri, Srinivasa Karthikeya Reddy, Mukherji, Abhishek","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"A Trust Layer for Agent Evaluation","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","publishedAt":"2026-10-05","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors propose an additive post-hoc framework that reports whether a recorded benchmark score should be believed, without changing that score.","excerpt":"an additive post-hoc framework that reports, beside each recorded score, whether it should be believed","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The framework checks grading support, traceable computation, whether the completion claim matches what occurred, and stability under repeated execution.","excerpt":"It verifies four properties: whether the result is supported by the benchmark's own grading logic, whether a passing answer was earned through traceable computation, whether the agent's completion claim matches what occurred, and whether the result is stable under repeated execution.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors applied the framework to five agent configurations on 108 tasks from Agents' Last Exam and report that only 22.6% of recorded passes cleared all four checks.","excerpt":"Applied to five agent configurations on 108 tasks from Agents' Last Exam, every model shows passing runs with no traceable computation (at rates varying tenfold), confirmed false completion claims, and unstable results: 18-46% of tasks do not stay in one score band over five runs. Only 22.6% of","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors distinguish measuring an agent’s capability from verifying that it actually performed the task as credited.","excerpt":"Measuring what an agent can do and verifying that it did it are different problems, and current benchmarks address only the first.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T04:44:06.787Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"Would the reported share of passes clearing all four checks remain similar across more tasks and agent configurations?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: A Trust Layer for Agent Evaluation","summary":"Authors Mohammadreza Sediqin, Shivali Dalmia, Srinivasa Karthikeya Reddy Kovvuri and Abhishek Mukherji argue that an agent’s benchmark score shows it received credit, not whether it earned that credit, reported completion honestly or can repeat the result. They introduce a Trust Layer for Agent Evaluation, an additive post-hoc framework that reports whether a recorded score should be believed. It checks whether the benchmark’s grading logic supports the result, whether a passing answer came from traceable computation, whether the completion claim matches what happened, and whether the result is stable under repeated execution. The first three checks use saved artifacts; the fourth re-runs the agent. Model judgments label evidence under majority voting, while deterministic rules produce verdicts without changing the score. Applied to five agent configurations on 108 tasks from Agents’ Last Exam, the framework found passing runs without traceable computation, confirmed false completion claims, and results that changed score bands across repeated runs. The authors report that only 22.6% of recorded passes cleared all four checks. Their central distinction is that measuring what an agent can do is not the same as verifying that it did it. The reported evaluation covers these configurations and tasks; the abstract does not establish how broadly the results apply.","question":"Would the reported share of passes clearing all four checks remain similar across more tasks and agent configurations?","claims":[{"text":"The authors propose an additive post-hoc framework that reports whether a recorded benchmark score should be believed, without changing that score.","excerpt":"an additive post-hoc framework that reports, beside each recorded score, whether it should be believed","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The framework checks grading support, traceable computation, whether the completion claim matches what occurred, and stability under repeated execution.","excerpt":"It verifies four properties: whether the result is supported by the benchmark's own grading logic, whether a passing answer was earned through traceable computation, whether the agent's completion claim matches what occurred, and whether the result is stable under repeated execution.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors applied the framework to five agent configurations on 108 tasks from Agents' Last Exam and report that only 22.6% of recorded passes cleared all four checks.","excerpt":"Applied to five agent configurations on 108 tasks from Agents' Last Exam, every model shows passing runs with no traceable computation (at rates varying tenfold), confirmed false completion claims, and unstable results: 18-46% of tasks do not stay in one score band over five runs. Only 22.6% of","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors distinguish measuring an agent’s capability from verifying that it actually performed the task as credited.","excerpt":"Measuring what an agent can do and verifying that it did it are different problems, and current benchmarks address only the first.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The reported evaluation covers five agent configurations and 108 tasks from Agents' Last Exam; the abstract does not establish how broadly the results apply.","The abstract reports results but does not describe the individual tasks or agent configurations in detail."],"mediaId":"c2161be43cf51c87169ca9cf678486b195829c94bc18fe2a95227a48803e7752","correctionReason":null,"id":"92f46dd640bf88d72eea8f653445efb3ca8846854854fc04725f1f344c95db74","publicationId":"c034495f-6ba3-4c76-8ab8-e02948918f1f","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","sourceTitle":"A Trust Layer for Agent Evaluation","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-05","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-08T11:49:08.485Z","createdAt":"2026-11-09T03:40:15.837Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"c2161be43cf51c87169ca9cf678486b195829c94bc18fe2a95227a48803e7752","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T03:39:16.879Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T04:44:06.787Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"c2161be43cf51c87169ca9cf678486b195829c94bc18fe2a95227a48803e7752","confidence":0.86,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"f2b3b1d0a075e986ffbdfc21e14c37f9d012e1fdad1248faded9408327e39ebf","decidedAt":"2026-11-09T03:39:17.693Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"48085d18df11cd78c5607ebbb32f099391b513105cad525e24d72e773e49a9f9","observationId":"fa111eacc2b7fab819c27530a895a122222e34bcf9630d207d9b18cf5b8da455","retrievedAt":"2026-11-09T03:39:16.773Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"98b3efad-87e8-4cce-86ec-003f46915eff"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"83bd3e6e-7f67-469b-8623-ec9cad6931a1"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-09T03:40:15.837Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Sediqin, Mohammadreza","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Dalmia, Shivali","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Kovvuri, Srinivasa Karthikeya Reddy","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Mukherji, Abhishek","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Sediqin, Mohammadreza","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Sediqin, Mohammadreza","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"7b0fb3ef83a333681a6a2f57ee4579f9c8e1146960ad15b05ec0d757fc93ace2:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T04:44:06.787Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"7b0fb3ef83a333681a6a2f57ee4579f9c8e1146960ad15b05ec0d757fc93ace2","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","contentSha256":"bcbdc1ac1f11bf58f8c22f858bdae4ab54ad9ba3ba4c03de11f8201b66bb96ac","textHash":"48085d18df11cd78c5607ebbb32f099391b513105cad525e24d72e773e49a9f9","observedAt":"2026-11-09T04:44:06.787Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Dalmia, Shivali","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Dalmia, Shivali","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"7b0fb3ef83a333681a6a2f57ee4579f9c8e1146960ad15b05ec0d757fc93ace2:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T04:44:06.787Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"7b0fb3ef83a333681a6a2f57ee4579f9c8e1146960ad15b05ec0d757fc93ace2","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","contentSha256":"bcbdc1ac1f11bf58f8c22f858bdae4ab54ad9ba3ba4c03de11f8201b66bb96ac","textHash":"48085d18df11cd78c5607ebbb32f099391b513105cad525e24d72e773e49a9f9","observedAt":"2026-11-09T04:44:06.787Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Kovvuri, Srinivasa Karthikeya Reddy","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Kovvuri, Srinivasa Karthikeya Reddy","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"7b0fb3ef83a333681a6a2f57ee4579f9c8e1146960ad15b05ec0d757fc93ace2:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T04:44:06.787Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"7b0fb3ef83a333681a6a2f57ee4579f9c8e1146960ad15b05ec0d757fc93ace2","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","contentSha256":"bcbdc1ac1f11bf58f8c22f858bdae4ab54ad9ba3ba4c03de11f8201b66bb96ac","textHash":"48085d18df11cd78c5607ebbb32f099391b513105cad525e24d72e773e49a9f9","observedAt":"2026-11-09T04:44:06.787Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Mukherji, Abhishek","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Mukherji, Abhishek","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"7b0fb3ef83a333681a6a2f57ee4579f9c8e1146960ad15b05ec0d757fc93ace2:participation:3","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T04:44:06.787Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"7b0fb3ef83a333681a6a2f57ee4579f9c8e1146960ad15b05ec0d757fc93ace2","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","contentSha256":"bcbdc1ac1f11bf58f8c22f858bdae4ab54ad9ba3ba4c03de11f8201b66bb96ac","textHash":"48085d18df11cd78c5607ebbb32f099391b513105cad525e24d72e773e49a9f9","observedAt":"2026-11-09T04:44:06.787Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":4,"returned":4,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07274","snapshotId":"7b0fb3ef83a333681a6a2f57ee4579f9c8e1146960ad15b05ec0d757fc93ace2","contentSha256":"bcbdc1ac1f11bf58f8c22f858bdae4ab54ad9ba3ba4c03de11f8201b66bb96ac","textHash":"48085d18df11cd78c5607ebbb32f099391b513105cad525e24d72e773e49a9f9","observedAt":"2026-11-09T04:44:06.787Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":44,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/92f46dd640bf88d72eea8f653445efb3ca8846854854fc04725f1f344c95db74/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"c034495f-6ba3-4c76-8ab8-e02948918f1f","verdict":"uncertain","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The draft attributes the paper to the four listed authors on arXiv cs.AI. Its findings are framed as authors' claims, using phrases such as 'argue' and 'The authors report'.","excerpt":"Authors:Mohammadreza Sediqin, Shivali Dalmia, Srinivasa Karthikeya Reddy Kovvuri, Abhishek Mukherji"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"uncertain","explanation":"The draft is accurate but weakens the source in two places. First, it ends the central distinction before the authors' sharper claim that current benchmarks address only capability measurement. Second, it reports 22.6% without the 95% CI (15.0-32.6) or n=84, and drops that every model showed these failures. Smallest repair: restore the clause 'current benchmarks address only the first', add 'every model', and add the CI and n. Central terms such as agent, benchmark and score band need term-library tooltips. Agents' Last Exam is never explained.","excerpt":"Measuring what an agent can do and verifying that it did it are different problems, and current benchmarks address only the first."},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"originalPublished is 2026-10-05, which matches the v1 submission date. It is neither the v2 revision date (5 Nov) nor the feed date (6 Nov).","excerpt":"[Submitted on 5 Oct 2026 (v1), last revised 5 Nov 2026 (this version, v2)]"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"Every claim and limitation is supported by the abstract. These include the four checks, the use of saved artifacts versus re-runs, verdicts that leave the score unchanged, and the 22.6% figure. The question about generalization and the scope limitation follow from the stated sample without overreaching.","excerpt":"Only 22.6% of recorded passes clear all four checks (95% CI 15.0-32.6, n=84)."},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified direct link to the original arXiv abstract page, so it matches the source.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-09T03:40:15.837Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}