{"id":"11cb306686b09d600c53fef381fe12e3f456c44061c0e2e38617281a8ec77405","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Authors propose theorem generation from contradictions","argument":"Yang Xu, Shuwei Chen, Hailin Guo and Jun Liu propose a way to generate theorems in first-order logic rather than starting with conjectures and trying to prove them. Their method builds minimally unsatisfiable clause sets: sets that cannot all be true, but become satisfiable when any one clause is removed. The authors use some clauses as premises and negate one clause, or a conjunction of clauses, to form a conclusion. They say this makes the premises satisfiable while the full set’s unsatisfiability guarantees the entailment, and describe each resulting theorem as correct by construction without a separate proof procedure for each instance.\n\nThe work extends an earlier generator into a family of eight methods, named Δ₁ through Δ₈; the authors say four have been implemented and released. They also describe a general Δ-class method and report combinatorial analysis of the capacity to generate large numbers of distinct theorems. The central idea is to build logical guarantees into how candidate theorems are formed, rather than generate statements that need later verification. This describes the framework’s construction, not its practical usefulness or the quality of generated theorems. The abstract does not give the analysis’s specific results or examples of the generated theorems.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The supplied evidence is the abstract, which does not give the combinatorial analysis’s specific results or examples of generated theorems. The abstract describes the authors’ framework and claims; it does not provide evidence here about practical usefulness or the quality of generated theorems.","speaker":{"name":"Xu, Yang, Chen, Shuwei, Guo, Hailin, Liu, Jun","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Automated Theorem Generation in First-Order Logic by Construction from Triangular Standard Contradictions","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","publishedAt":"2026-10-30","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors propose generating first-order logic theorems from minimally unsatisfiable clause sets, using some clauses as premises and the negation of one clause or a conjunction as the conclusion.","excerpt":"The method constructs minimally unsatisfiable clause sets from selected first-order literals, then forms theorems by retaining some clauses as premises and taking the negation of one clause, or a conjunction of clauses, as the conclusion.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say minimal unsatisfiability keeps the remaining premises satisfiable, while the full set’s unsatisfiability guarantees the resulting entailment; each theorem is correct by construction without a separate proof procedure for each instance.","excerpt":"Minimal unsatisfiability ensures that the remaining premises are satisfiable, avoiding trivial inference by explosion, while unsatisfiability of the full set guarantees the resulting entailment.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors extend an earlier generator into eight methods, report that four are implemented and released, and say combinatorial analysis demonstrates capacity to generate large numbers of distinct theorems systematically.","excerpt":"Extending the previously developed $\\Delta_1$ generator, we introduce seven methods, $\\Delta_2$--$\\Delta_8$, forming a unified family of eight theorem-generation methods. Four generators, $\\Delta_1$--$\\Delta_4$, have been implemented and released.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T06:54:15.234Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"What specific results does the paper’s combinatorial analysis establish about the number of distinct theorems the methods can generate?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: Authors propose theorem generation from contradictions","summary":"Yang Xu, Shuwei Chen, Hailin Guo and Jun Liu propose a way to generate theorems in first-order logic rather than starting with conjectures and trying to prove them. Their method builds minimally unsatisfiable clause sets: sets that cannot all be true, but become satisfiable when any one clause is removed. The authors use some clauses as premises and negate one clause, or a conjunction of clauses, to form a conclusion. They say this makes the premises satisfiable while the full set’s unsatisfiability guarantees the entailment, and describe each resulting theorem as correct by construction without a separate proof procedure for each instance.\n\nThe work extends an earlier generator into a family of eight methods, named Δ₁ through Δ₈; the authors say four have been implemented and released. They also describe a general Δ-class method and report combinatorial analysis of the capacity to generate large numbers of distinct theorems. The central idea is to build logical guarantees into how candidate theorems are formed, rather than generate statements that need later verification. This describes the framework’s construction, not its practical usefulness or the quality of generated theorems. The abstract does not give the analysis’s specific results or examples of the generated theorems.","question":"What specific results does the paper’s combinatorial analysis establish about the number of distinct theorems the methods can generate?","claims":[{"text":"The authors propose generating first-order logic theorems from minimally unsatisfiable clause sets, using some clauses as premises and the negation of one clause or a conjunction as the conclusion.","excerpt":"The method constructs minimally unsatisfiable clause sets from selected first-order literals, then forms theorems by retaining some clauses as premises and taking the negation of one clause, or a conjunction of clauses, as the conclusion.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say minimal unsatisfiability keeps the remaining premises satisfiable, while the full set’s unsatisfiability guarantees the resulting entailment; each theorem is correct by construction without a separate proof procedure for each instance.","excerpt":"Minimal unsatisfiability ensures that the remaining premises are satisfiable, avoiding trivial inference by explosion, while unsatisfiability of the full set guarantees the resulting entailment.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors extend an earlier generator into eight methods, report that four are implemented and released, and say combinatorial analysis demonstrates capacity to generate large numbers of distinct theorems systematically.","excerpt":"Extending the previously developed $\\Delta_1$ generator, we introduce seven methods, $\\Delta_2$--$\\Delta_8$, forming a unified family of eight theorem-generation methods. Four generators, $\\Delta_1$--$\\Delta_4$, have been implemented and released.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The supplied evidence is the abstract, which does not give the combinatorial analysis’s specific results or examples of generated theorems.","The abstract describes the authors’ framework and claims; it does not provide evidence here about practical usefulness or the quality of generated theorems."],"mediaId":"14aa402972a361c83e1d6d78befd6c5c5274082606591990e9f655da447cd2f8","correctionReason":null,"id":"11cb306686b09d600c53fef381fe12e3f456c44061c0e2e38617281a8ec77405","publicationId":"983a77f9-814a-4969-8414-3556e2d7866e","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","sourceTitle":"Automated Theorem Generation in First-Order Logic by Construction from Triangular Standard Contradictions","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-30","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-03T09:04:38.119Z","createdAt":"2026-11-10T06:38:09.365Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"14aa402972a361c83e1d6d78befd6c5c5274082606591990e9f655da447cd2f8","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-04T02:47:09.825Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T06:54:15.234Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"14aa402972a361c83e1d6d78befd6c5c5274082606591990e9f655da447cd2f8","confidence":0.5900000000000001,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"ec38730a21a98a05020b48b81f9cffd0095bf3b3e8816ada9657c42030211c75","decidedAt":"2026-11-04T02:47:11.199Z","redecided":{"from":"stream-admission-v5","under":"stream-admission-v5+confidence-0.5"}},"provenance":{"textHash":"18c9d9e68c31fa689849561742f6dfebfca0eedee2af32a616054a0d954ded9a","observationId":"e2ad567c36c27dd47ba761cf132e3631673090a54e932f497b5301efdfb41d78","retrievedAt":"2026-11-04T02:47:09.667Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"5fe529f7-1397-41f7-83e3-1ef26686dc9b"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"51a7ceea-fc12-4da5-8273-9b60457e6f58"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-10T06:38:09.365Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Xu, Yang","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Chen, Shuwei","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Guo, Hailin","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Liu, Jun","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Xu, Yang","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Xu, Yang","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"0e72e778e602f71ede52b5a1995c12e3f5df47da06a43f01ecff58ddcd550046:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T06:54:15.234Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"0e72e778e602f71ede52b5a1995c12e3f5df47da06a43f01ecff58ddcd550046","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","contentSha256":"1d0a6bdeb11ea8deb47ebf8a5617645836d090553cb3d69b69a6010ab1599fea","textHash":"18c9d9e68c31fa689849561742f6dfebfca0eedee2af32a616054a0d954ded9a","observedAt":"2026-11-10T06:54:15.234Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Chen, Shuwei","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Chen, Shuwei","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"0e72e778e602f71ede52b5a1995c12e3f5df47da06a43f01ecff58ddcd550046:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T06:54:15.234Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"0e72e778e602f71ede52b5a1995c12e3f5df47da06a43f01ecff58ddcd550046","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","contentSha256":"1d0a6bdeb11ea8deb47ebf8a5617645836d090553cb3d69b69a6010ab1599fea","textHash":"18c9d9e68c31fa689849561742f6dfebfca0eedee2af32a616054a0d954ded9a","observedAt":"2026-11-10T06:54:15.234Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Guo, Hailin","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Guo, Hailin","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"0e72e778e602f71ede52b5a1995c12e3f5df47da06a43f01ecff58ddcd550046:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T06:54:15.234Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"0e72e778e602f71ede52b5a1995c12e3f5df47da06a43f01ecff58ddcd550046","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","contentSha256":"1d0a6bdeb11ea8deb47ebf8a5617645836d090553cb3d69b69a6010ab1599fea","textHash":"18c9d9e68c31fa689849561742f6dfebfca0eedee2af32a616054a0d954ded9a","observedAt":"2026-11-10T06:54:15.234Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Liu, Jun","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Liu, Jun","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"0e72e778e602f71ede52b5a1995c12e3f5df47da06a43f01ecff58ddcd550046:participation:3","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T06:54:15.234Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"0e72e778e602f71ede52b5a1995c12e3f5df47da06a43f01ecff58ddcd550046","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","contentSha256":"1d0a6bdeb11ea8deb47ebf8a5617645836d090553cb3d69b69a6010ab1599fea","textHash":"18c9d9e68c31fa689849561742f6dfebfca0eedee2af32a616054a0d954ded9a","observedAt":"2026-11-10T06:54:15.234Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":4,"returned":4,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","snapshotId":"0e72e778e602f71ede52b5a1995c12e3f5df47da06a43f01ecff58ddcd550046","contentSha256":"1d0a6bdeb11ea8deb47ebf8a5617645836d090553cb3d69b69a6010ab1599fea","textHash":"18c9d9e68c31fa689849561742f6dfebfca0eedee2af32a616054a0d954ded9a","observedAt":"2026-11-10T06:54:15.234Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":42,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/11cb306686b09d600c53fef381fe12e3f456c44061c0e2e38617281a8ec77405/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-authors-propose-theorem-generation-from-11cb3066","formats":{"html":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-authors-propose-theorem-generation-from-11cb3066","markdown":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-authors-propose-theorem-generation-from-11cb3066.md","json":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-authors-propose-theorem-generation-from-11cb3066.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"11cb306686b09d600c53fef381fe12e3f456c44061c0e2e38617281a8ec77405","revision":"983a77f9-814a-4969-8414-3556e2d7866e","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Authors propose theorem generation from contradictions","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-authors-propose-theorem-generation-from-11cb3066"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","revision":"18c9d9e68c31fa689849561742f6dfebfca0eedee2af32a616054a0d954ded9a","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Automated Theorem Generation in First-Order Logic by Construction from Triangular Standard Contradictions","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"11cb306686b09d600c53fef381fe12e3f456c44061c0e2e38617281a8ec77405","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Authors propose theorem generation from contradictions","argument":"Yang Xu, Shuwei Chen, Hailin Guo and Jun Liu propose a way to generate theorems in first-order logic rather than starting with conjectures and trying to prove them. Their method builds minimally unsatisfiable clause sets: sets that cannot all be true, but become satisfiable when any one clause is removed. The authors use some clauses as premises and negate one clause, or a conjunction of clauses, to form a conclusion. They say this makes the premises satisfiable while the full set’s unsatisfiability guarantees the entailment, and describe each resulting theorem as correct by construction without a separate proof procedure for each instance.\n\nThe work extends an earlier generator into a family of eight methods, named Δ₁ through Δ₈; the authors say four have been implemented and released. They also describe a general Δ-class method and report combinatorial analysis of the capacity to generate large numbers of distinct theorems. The central idea is to build logical guarantees into how candidate theorems are formed, rather than generate statements that need later verification. This describes the framework’s construction, not its practical usefulness or the quality of generated theorems. The abstract does not give the analysis’s specific results or examples of the generated theorems.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The supplied evidence is the abstract, which does not give the combinatorial analysis’s specific results or examples of generated theorems. The abstract describes the authors’ framework and claims; it does not provide evidence here about practical usefulness or the quality of generated theorems.","speaker":{"name":"Xu, Yang, Chen, Shuwei, Guo, Hailin, Liu, Jun","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Automated Theorem Generation in First-Order Logic by Construction from Triangular Standard Contradictions","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","publishedAt":"2026-10-30","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors propose generating first-order logic theorems from minimally unsatisfiable clause sets, using some clauses as premises and the negation of one clause or a conjunction as the conclusion.","excerpt":"The method constructs minimally unsatisfiable clause sets from selected first-order literals, then forms theorems by retaining some clauses as premises and taking the negation of one clause, or a conjunction of clauses, as the conclusion.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say minimal unsatisfiability keeps the remaining premises satisfiable, while the full set’s unsatisfiability guarantees the resulting entailment; each theorem is correct by construction without a separate proof procedure for each instance.","excerpt":"Minimal unsatisfiability ensures that the remaining premises are satisfiable, avoiding trivial inference by explosion, while unsatisfiability of the full set guarantees the resulting entailment.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors extend an earlier generator into eight methods, report that four are implemented and released, and say combinatorial analysis demonstrates capacity to generate large numbers of distinct theorems systematically.","excerpt":"Extending the previously developed $\\Delta_1$ generator, we introduce seven methods, $\\Delta_2$--$\\Delta_8$, forming a unified family of eight theorem-generation methods. Four generators, $\\Delta_1$--$\\Delta_4$, have been implemented and released.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T06:54:15.234Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"What specific results does the paper’s combinatorial analysis establish about the number of distinct theorems the methods can generate?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: Authors propose theorem generation from contradictions","summary":"Yang Xu, Shuwei Chen, Hailin Guo and Jun Liu propose a way to generate theorems in first-order logic rather than starting with conjectures and trying to prove them. Their method builds minimally unsatisfiable clause sets: sets that cannot all be true, but become satisfiable when any one clause is removed. The authors use some clauses as premises and negate one clause, or a conjunction of clauses, to form a conclusion. They say this makes the premises satisfiable while the full set’s unsatisfiability guarantees the entailment, and describe each resulting theorem as correct by construction without a separate proof procedure for each instance.\n\nThe work extends an earlier generator into a family of eight methods, named Δ₁ through Δ₈; the authors say four have been implemented and released. They also describe a general Δ-class method and report combinatorial analysis of the capacity to generate large numbers of distinct theorems. The central idea is to build logical guarantees into how candidate theorems are formed, rather than generate statements that need later verification. This describes the framework’s construction, not its practical usefulness or the quality of generated theorems. The abstract does not give the analysis’s specific results or examples of the generated theorems.","question":"What specific results does the paper’s combinatorial analysis establish about the number of distinct theorems the methods can generate?","claims":[{"text":"The authors propose generating first-order logic theorems from minimally unsatisfiable clause sets, using some clauses as premises and the negation of one clause or a conjunction as the conclusion.","excerpt":"The method constructs minimally unsatisfiable clause sets from selected first-order literals, then forms theorems by retaining some clauses as premises and taking the negation of one clause, or a conjunction of clauses, as the conclusion.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say minimal unsatisfiability keeps the remaining premises satisfiable, while the full set’s unsatisfiability guarantees the resulting entailment; each theorem is correct by construction without a separate proof procedure for each instance.","excerpt":"Minimal unsatisfiability ensures that the remaining premises are satisfiable, avoiding trivial inference by explosion, while unsatisfiability of the full set guarantees the resulting entailment.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors extend an earlier generator into eight methods, report that four are implemented and released, and say combinatorial analysis demonstrates capacity to generate large numbers of distinct theorems systematically.","excerpt":"Extending the previously developed $\\Delta_1$ generator, we introduce seven methods, $\\Delta_2$--$\\Delta_8$, forming a unified family of eight theorem-generation methods. Four generators, $\\Delta_1$--$\\Delta_4$, have been implemented and released.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The supplied evidence is the abstract, which does not give the combinatorial analysis’s specific results or examples of generated theorems.","The abstract describes the authors’ framework and claims; it does not provide evidence here about practical usefulness or the quality of generated theorems."],"mediaId":"14aa402972a361c83e1d6d78befd6c5c5274082606591990e9f655da447cd2f8","correctionReason":null,"id":"11cb306686b09d600c53fef381fe12e3f456c44061c0e2e38617281a8ec77405","publicationId":"983a77f9-814a-4969-8414-3556e2d7866e","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","sourceTitle":"Automated Theorem Generation in First-Order Logic by Construction from Triangular Standard Contradictions","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-30","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-03T09:04:38.119Z","createdAt":"2026-11-10T06:38:09.365Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"14aa402972a361c83e1d6d78befd6c5c5274082606591990e9f655da447cd2f8","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-04T02:47:09.825Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T06:54:15.234Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"14aa402972a361c83e1d6d78befd6c5c5274082606591990e9f655da447cd2f8","confidence":0.5900000000000001,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"ec38730a21a98a05020b48b81f9cffd0095bf3b3e8816ada9657c42030211c75","decidedAt":"2026-11-04T02:47:11.199Z","redecided":{"from":"stream-admission-v5","under":"stream-admission-v5+confidence-0.5"}},"provenance":{"textHash":"18c9d9e68c31fa689849561742f6dfebfca0eedee2af32a616054a0d954ded9a","observationId":"e2ad567c36c27dd47ba761cf132e3631673090a54e932f497b5301efdfb41d78","retrievedAt":"2026-11-04T02:47:09.667Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"5fe529f7-1397-41f7-83e3-1ef26686dc9b"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"51a7ceea-fc12-4da5-8273-9b60457e6f58"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-10T06:38:09.365Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Xu, Yang","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Chen, Shuwei","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Guo, Hailin","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Liu, Jun","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Xu, Yang","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Xu, Yang","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"0e72e778e602f71ede52b5a1995c12e3f5df47da06a43f01ecff58ddcd550046:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T06:54:15.234Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"0e72e778e602f71ede52b5a1995c12e3f5df47da06a43f01ecff58ddcd550046","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","contentSha256":"1d0a6bdeb11ea8deb47ebf8a5617645836d090553cb3d69b69a6010ab1599fea","textHash":"18c9d9e68c31fa689849561742f6dfebfca0eedee2af32a616054a0d954ded9a","observedAt":"2026-11-10T06:54:15.234Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Chen, Shuwei","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Chen, Shuwei","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"0e72e778e602f71ede52b5a1995c12e3f5df47da06a43f01ecff58ddcd550046:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T06:54:15.234Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"0e72e778e602f71ede52b5a1995c12e3f5df47da06a43f01ecff58ddcd550046","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","contentSha256":"1d0a6bdeb11ea8deb47ebf8a5617645836d090553cb3d69b69a6010ab1599fea","textHash":"18c9d9e68c31fa689849561742f6dfebfca0eedee2af32a616054a0d954ded9a","observedAt":"2026-11-10T06:54:15.234Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Guo, Hailin","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Guo, Hailin","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"0e72e778e602f71ede52b5a1995c12e3f5df47da06a43f01ecff58ddcd550046:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T06:54:15.234Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"0e72e778e602f71ede52b5a1995c12e3f5df47da06a43f01ecff58ddcd550046","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","contentSha256":"1d0a6bdeb11ea8deb47ebf8a5617645836d090553cb3d69b69a6010ab1599fea","textHash":"18c9d9e68c31fa689849561742f6dfebfca0eedee2af32a616054a0d954ded9a","observedAt":"2026-11-10T06:54:15.234Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Liu, Jun","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Liu, Jun","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"0e72e778e602f71ede52b5a1995c12e3f5df47da06a43f01ecff58ddcd550046:participation:3","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T06:54:15.234Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"0e72e778e602f71ede52b5a1995c12e3f5df47da06a43f01ecff58ddcd550046","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","contentSha256":"1d0a6bdeb11ea8deb47ebf8a5617645836d090553cb3d69b69a6010ab1599fea","textHash":"18c9d9e68c31fa689849561742f6dfebfca0eedee2af32a616054a0d954ded9a","observedAt":"2026-11-10T06:54:15.234Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":4,"returned":4,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00269","snapshotId":"0e72e778e602f71ede52b5a1995c12e3f5df47da06a43f01ecff58ddcd550046","contentSha256":"1d0a6bdeb11ea8deb47ebf8a5617645836d090553cb3d69b69a6010ab1599fea","textHash":"18c9d9e68c31fa689849561742f6dfebfca0eedee2af32a616054a0d954ded9a","observedAt":"2026-11-10T06:54:15.234Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":42,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/11cb306686b09d600c53fef381fe12e3f456c44061c0e2e38617281a8ec77405/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"983a77f9-814a-4969-8414-3556e2d7866e","verdict":"uncertain","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The draft correctly attributes the proposal to the listed authors, Yang Xu, Shuwei Chen, Hailin Guo and Jun Liu, and it frames correctness and capacity as the authors' claims rather than established facts.","excerpt":"Authors:Yang Xu, Shuwei Chen, Hailin Guo, Jun Liu"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"uncertain","explanation":"The reading is faithful and keeps the technical terms. However, it says the method 'makes the premises satisfiable' without saying why that matters. The abstract's stated reason is avoiding 'trivial inference by explosion', meaning contradictory premises would entail anything. Without that condition, non-specialists cannot see the point of the construction. The draft also omits the authors' stated aim of a foundation for 'logically guaranteed knowledge'. Smallest repair: add the explosion rationale, with a tooltip for the term, and the authors' framing of the goal.","excerpt":"Minimal unsatisfiability ensures that the remaining premises are satisfiable, avoiding trivial inference by explosion"},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The originalPublished date, 2026-10-30, matches the v1 submission date shown on the arXiv page. The feed date of Nov 3 is a later announcement and is correctly not used.","excerpt":"[Submitted on 30 Oct 2026]"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"Each claim is a source-stated assertion with an accurate excerpt. The 'correct by construction' claim is attributed to the authors. The limitations accurately note that the abstract lacks specific combinatorial results and example theorems. The question follows from the abstract's unquantified 'large numbers' claim, and the draft states no unsupported benefits or costs.","excerpt":"Theorems are therefore correct by construction, without a separate proof procedure for each instance."},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified direct link to the arXiv abstract page of the source paper, which is the most direct access to the source.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-10T06:38:09.365Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}