{"id":"9731cbf749e1e6af14a82b600043642846cac933753b8e1187b5444aac9b41bd","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Autonomous AI Agents Systematically Diverge From Human Preferences in Proof Formalization","argument":"Bálint Gyevnár and Simon DeDeo argue that AI agents and humans approach proof-making differently, a distinction that matters as AI produces more proofs for people to understand. Their “simulated collaboration” method examines what agents attend to and how their preferences for what to do next diverge from humans. The authors examine nine major human collaborations in Lean. They report that agents are more drawn to explicitly marked gaps, less drawn to densely connected proof centers and complex or surprising proof goals, and more drawn to surprising proof bodies, which they tend to regularize toward baseline. The authors say these patterns point to blind spots and potential interventions for future human-AI collaboration in mathematics. The abstract does not describe specific interventions or establish how broadly the findings apply beyond the collaborations studied.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The evidence provided is the paper's abstract, not its full methods or results; it does not specify how the authors identify preferences or describe potential interventions. The reported study covers nine major human collaborations in Lean; the abstract does not establish whether the findings generalize beyond them.","speaker":{"name":"Gyevnár, Bálint, DeDeo, Simon","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Autonomous AI Agents Systematically Diverge From Human Preferences in Proof Formalization","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","publishedAt":"2026-11-04","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors use simulated collaboration to examine how AI agents attend to proof features and how their preferences for next steps differ from human preferences.","excerpt":"We present \"simulated collaboration\", a methodology that allows us to examine two key questions","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Across nine human collaborations in Lean, the authors report that agents are more strongly drawn than humans to explicitly marked gaps.","excerpt":"AI agents (1) are far more strongly drawn than humans to explicitly marked gaps;","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that agents are relatively averse to densely connected proof centers and complex or surprising proof goals.","excerpt":"show a relative aversion to densely connected proof centers and to complex or surprising proof goals","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that agents are relatively attracted to surprising proof bodies, which they tend to regularize toward baseline.","excerpt":"are relatively attracted to surprising proof bodies, which they tend to regularize toward baseline.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say their results highlight blind spots and potential interventions for future human-AI collaboration in mathematics.","excerpt":"Our results highlight important blind spots and potential interventions for future human-AI collaboration in mathematics.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T01:04:08.614Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"Do the reported preference patterns hold beyond the nine human collaborations in Lean examined in the study?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: Autonomous AI Agents Systematically Diverge From Human Preferences in Proof Formalization","summary":"Bálint Gyevnár and Simon DeDeo argue that AI agents and humans approach proof-making differently, a distinction that matters as AI produces more proofs for people to understand. Their “simulated collaboration” method examines what agents attend to and how their preferences for what to do next diverge from humans. The authors examine nine major human collaborations in Lean. They report that agents are more drawn to explicitly marked gaps, less drawn to densely connected proof centers and complex or surprising proof goals, and more drawn to surprising proof bodies, which they tend to regularize toward baseline. The authors say these patterns point to blind spots and potential interventions for future human-AI collaboration in mathematics. The abstract does not describe specific interventions or establish how broadly the findings apply beyond the collaborations studied.","question":"Do the reported preference patterns hold beyond the nine human collaborations in Lean examined in the study?","claims":[{"text":"The authors use simulated collaboration to examine how AI agents attend to proof features and how their preferences for next steps differ from human preferences.","excerpt":"We present \"simulated collaboration\", a methodology that allows us to examine two key questions","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Across nine human collaborations in Lean, the authors report that agents are more strongly drawn than humans to explicitly marked gaps.","excerpt":"AI agents (1) are far more strongly drawn than humans to explicitly marked gaps;","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that agents are relatively averse to densely connected proof centers and complex or surprising proof goals.","excerpt":"show a relative aversion to densely connected proof centers and to complex or surprising proof goals","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that agents are relatively attracted to surprising proof bodies, which they tend to regularize toward baseline.","excerpt":"are relatively attracted to surprising proof bodies, which they tend to regularize toward baseline.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say their results highlight blind spots and potential interventions for future human-AI collaboration in mathematics.","excerpt":"Our results highlight important blind spots and potential interventions for future human-AI collaboration in mathematics.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The evidence provided is the paper's abstract, not its full methods or results; it does not specify how the authors identify preferences or describe potential interventions.","The reported study covers nine major human collaborations in Lean; the abstract does not establish whether the findings generalize beyond them."],"mediaId":"d37a69f2f16a8e8ff313f9af185e5469cc048ab9cc9bc88e2a75a77ad2049c05","correctionReason":null,"id":"9731cbf749e1e6af14a82b600043642846cac933753b8e1187b5444aac9b41bd","publicationId":"c59ad8ba-4579-44ae-8e62-e21a376f437e","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","sourceTitle":"Autonomous AI Agents Systematically Diverge From Human Preferences in Proof Formalization","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-04","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-06T05:03:29.145Z","createdAt":"2026-11-09T00:00:58.830Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"d37a69f2f16a8e8ff313f9af185e5469cc048ab9cc9bc88e2a75a77ad2049c05","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-08T23:55:06.636Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T01:04:08.614Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"d37a69f2f16a8e8ff313f9af185e5469cc048ab9cc9bc88e2a75a77ad2049c05","confidence":0.8200000000000001,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"d70c3e15a6a2b984932d37767739f2da7adc39f996d081626ed985b32a0f3a61","decidedAt":"2026-11-08T23:55:08.096Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"08de77d29bf5f33196ddc7cf468dc1402f8d0a928f10bf2658d9e99d6f2d27bd","observationId":"331489bcdf4f21258d86a5c4e9d0ea91d8b4a63c57b85934ff040e607a03cd53","retrievedAt":"2026-11-08T23:55:06.394Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"15e9c38c-7f6c-4350-8975-aa192057e9fc"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"40c5e10d-9c40-48d2-8f14-63302c2ea0d1"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-09T00:00:58.830Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Gyevnár, Bálint","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"DeDeo, Simon","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Gyevnár, Bálint","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Gyevnár, Bálint","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"7633484470e808cc9fb8b8c5a5da59035ff689c8d066d4971bd5c89fc70f2546:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T01:04:08.614Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"7633484470e808cc9fb8b8c5a5da59035ff689c8d066d4971bd5c89fc70f2546","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","contentSha256":"e3c1d7d8a721b0116b462177ae00a27751499e705a3fb9bb82d68c8d97555e20","textHash":"08de77d29bf5f33196ddc7cf468dc1402f8d0a928f10bf2658d9e99d6f2d27bd","observedAt":"2026-11-09T01:04:08.614Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"DeDeo, Simon","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"DeDeo, Simon","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"7633484470e808cc9fb8b8c5a5da59035ff689c8d066d4971bd5c89fc70f2546:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T01:04:08.614Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"7633484470e808cc9fb8b8c5a5da59035ff689c8d066d4971bd5c89fc70f2546","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","contentSha256":"e3c1d7d8a721b0116b462177ae00a27751499e705a3fb9bb82d68c8d97555e20","textHash":"08de77d29bf5f33196ddc7cf468dc1402f8d0a928f10bf2658d9e99d6f2d27bd","observedAt":"2026-11-09T01:04:08.614Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":2,"returned":2,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","snapshotId":"7633484470e808cc9fb8b8c5a5da59035ff689c8d066d4971bd5c89fc70f2546","contentSha256":"e3c1d7d8a721b0116b462177ae00a27751499e705a3fb9bb82d68c8d97555e20","textHash":"08de77d29bf5f33196ddc7cf468dc1402f8d0a928f10bf2658d9e99d6f2d27bd","observedAt":"2026-11-09T01:04:08.614Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":41,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/9731cbf749e1e6af14a82b600043642846cac933753b8e1187b5444aac9b41bd/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-autonomous-ai-agents-systematically-diverge-from-9731cbf7","formats":{"html":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-autonomous-ai-agents-systematically-diverge-from-9731cbf7","markdown":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-autonomous-ai-agents-systematically-diverge-from-9731cbf7.md","json":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-autonomous-ai-agents-systematically-diverge-from-9731cbf7.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[{"id":"term-ai-agent","name":"AI agent","explanation":"An AI system that chooses and carries out actions toward a goal, often using software tools.","referenceUrl":"https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/ai-agents"}],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"},{"id":"lean","name":"Lean","kind":"concept","context":"Lean is a programming language and proof assistant used to express mathematical statements and check formal proofs.","referenceUrls":["https://lean-lang.org/","https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/Axioms-and-Computation/"],"path":"/entities/lean","json":"/entities/lean.json","markdown":"/entities/lean.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"9731cbf749e1e6af14a82b600043642846cac933753b8e1187b5444aac9b41bd","revision":"c59ad8ba-4579-44ae-8e62-e21a376f437e","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Autonomous AI Agents Systematically Diverge From Human Preferences in Proof Formalization","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-autonomous-ai-agents-systematically-diverge-from-9731cbf7"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","revision":"08de77d29bf5f33196ddc7cf468dc1402f8d0a928f10bf2658d9e99d6f2d27bd","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Autonomous AI Agents Systematically Diverge From Human Preferences in Proof Formalization","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"9731cbf749e1e6af14a82b600043642846cac933753b8e1187b5444aac9b41bd","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Autonomous AI Agents Systematically Diverge From Human Preferences in Proof Formalization","argument":"Bálint Gyevnár and Simon DeDeo argue that AI agents and humans approach proof-making differently, a distinction that matters as AI produces more proofs for people to understand. Their “simulated collaboration” method examines what agents attend to and how their preferences for what to do next diverge from humans. The authors examine nine major human collaborations in Lean. They report that agents are more drawn to explicitly marked gaps, less drawn to densely connected proof centers and complex or surprising proof goals, and more drawn to surprising proof bodies, which they tend to regularize toward baseline. The authors say these patterns point to blind spots and potential interventions for future human-AI collaboration in mathematics. The abstract does not describe specific interventions or establish how broadly the findings apply beyond the collaborations studied.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The evidence provided is the paper's abstract, not its full methods or results; it does not specify how the authors identify preferences or describe potential interventions. The reported study covers nine major human collaborations in Lean; the abstract does not establish whether the findings generalize beyond them.","speaker":{"name":"Gyevnár, Bálint, DeDeo, Simon","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Autonomous AI Agents Systematically Diverge From Human Preferences in Proof Formalization","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","publishedAt":"2026-11-04","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors use simulated collaboration to examine how AI agents attend to proof features and how their preferences for next steps differ from human preferences.","excerpt":"We present \"simulated collaboration\", a methodology that allows us to examine two key questions","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Across nine human collaborations in Lean, the authors report that agents are more strongly drawn than humans to explicitly marked gaps.","excerpt":"AI agents (1) are far more strongly drawn than humans to explicitly marked gaps;","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that agents are relatively averse to densely connected proof centers and complex or surprising proof goals.","excerpt":"show a relative aversion to densely connected proof centers and to complex or surprising proof goals","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that agents are relatively attracted to surprising proof bodies, which they tend to regularize toward baseline.","excerpt":"are relatively attracted to surprising proof bodies, which they tend to regularize toward baseline.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say their results highlight blind spots and potential interventions for future human-AI collaboration in mathematics.","excerpt":"Our results highlight important blind spots and potential interventions for future human-AI collaboration in mathematics.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T01:04:08.614Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"Do the reported preference patterns hold beyond the nine human collaborations in Lean examined in the study?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: Autonomous AI Agents Systematically Diverge From Human Preferences in Proof Formalization","summary":"Bálint Gyevnár and Simon DeDeo argue that AI agents and humans approach proof-making differently, a distinction that matters as AI produces more proofs for people to understand. Their “simulated collaboration” method examines what agents attend to and how their preferences for what to do next diverge from humans. The authors examine nine major human collaborations in Lean. They report that agents are more drawn to explicitly marked gaps, less drawn to densely connected proof centers and complex or surprising proof goals, and more drawn to surprising proof bodies, which they tend to regularize toward baseline. The authors say these patterns point to blind spots and potential interventions for future human-AI collaboration in mathematics. The abstract does not describe specific interventions or establish how broadly the findings apply beyond the collaborations studied.","question":"Do the reported preference patterns hold beyond the nine human collaborations in Lean examined in the study?","claims":[{"text":"The authors use simulated collaboration to examine how AI agents attend to proof features and how their preferences for next steps differ from human preferences.","excerpt":"We present \"simulated collaboration\", a methodology that allows us to examine two key questions","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Across nine human collaborations in Lean, the authors report that agents are more strongly drawn than humans to explicitly marked gaps.","excerpt":"AI agents (1) are far more strongly drawn than humans to explicitly marked gaps;","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that agents are relatively averse to densely connected proof centers and complex or surprising proof goals.","excerpt":"show a relative aversion to densely connected proof centers and to complex or surprising proof goals","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that agents are relatively attracted to surprising proof bodies, which they tend to regularize toward baseline.","excerpt":"are relatively attracted to surprising proof bodies, which they tend to regularize toward baseline.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say their results highlight blind spots and potential interventions for future human-AI collaboration in mathematics.","excerpt":"Our results highlight important blind spots and potential interventions for future human-AI collaboration in mathematics.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The evidence provided is the paper's abstract, not its full methods or results; it does not specify how the authors identify preferences or describe potential interventions.","The reported study covers nine major human collaborations in Lean; the abstract does not establish whether the findings generalize beyond them."],"mediaId":"d37a69f2f16a8e8ff313f9af185e5469cc048ab9cc9bc88e2a75a77ad2049c05","correctionReason":null,"id":"9731cbf749e1e6af14a82b600043642846cac933753b8e1187b5444aac9b41bd","publicationId":"c59ad8ba-4579-44ae-8e62-e21a376f437e","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","sourceTitle":"Autonomous AI Agents Systematically Diverge From Human Preferences in Proof Formalization","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-04","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-06T05:03:29.145Z","createdAt":"2026-11-09T00:00:58.830Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"d37a69f2f16a8e8ff313f9af185e5469cc048ab9cc9bc88e2a75a77ad2049c05","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-08T23:55:06.636Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T01:04:08.614Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"d37a69f2f16a8e8ff313f9af185e5469cc048ab9cc9bc88e2a75a77ad2049c05","confidence":0.8200000000000001,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"d70c3e15a6a2b984932d37767739f2da7adc39f996d081626ed985b32a0f3a61","decidedAt":"2026-11-08T23:55:08.096Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"08de77d29bf5f33196ddc7cf468dc1402f8d0a928f10bf2658d9e99d6f2d27bd","observationId":"331489bcdf4f21258d86a5c4e9d0ea91d8b4a63c57b85934ff040e607a03cd53","retrievedAt":"2026-11-08T23:55:06.394Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"15e9c38c-7f6c-4350-8975-aa192057e9fc"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"40c5e10d-9c40-48d2-8f14-63302c2ea0d1"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-09T00:00:58.830Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Gyevnár, Bálint","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"DeDeo, Simon","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Gyevnár, Bálint","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Gyevnár, Bálint","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"7633484470e808cc9fb8b8c5a5da59035ff689c8d066d4971bd5c89fc70f2546:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T01:04:08.614Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"7633484470e808cc9fb8b8c5a5da59035ff689c8d066d4971bd5c89fc70f2546","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","contentSha256":"e3c1d7d8a721b0116b462177ae00a27751499e705a3fb9bb82d68c8d97555e20","textHash":"08de77d29bf5f33196ddc7cf468dc1402f8d0a928f10bf2658d9e99d6f2d27bd","observedAt":"2026-11-09T01:04:08.614Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"DeDeo, Simon","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"DeDeo, Simon","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"7633484470e808cc9fb8b8c5a5da59035ff689c8d066d4971bd5c89fc70f2546:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T01:04:08.614Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"7633484470e808cc9fb8b8c5a5da59035ff689c8d066d4971bd5c89fc70f2546","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","contentSha256":"e3c1d7d8a721b0116b462177ae00a27751499e705a3fb9bb82d68c8d97555e20","textHash":"08de77d29bf5f33196ddc7cf468dc1402f8d0a928f10bf2658d9e99d6f2d27bd","observedAt":"2026-11-09T01:04:08.614Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":2,"returned":2,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995","snapshotId":"7633484470e808cc9fb8b8c5a5da59035ff689c8d066d4971bd5c89fc70f2546","contentSha256":"e3c1d7d8a721b0116b462177ae00a27751499e705a3fb9bb82d68c8d97555e20","textHash":"08de77d29bf5f33196ddc7cf468dc1402f8d0a928f10bf2658d9e99d6f2d27bd","observedAt":"2026-11-09T01:04:08.614Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":41,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/9731cbf749e1e6af14a82b600043642846cac933753b8e1187b5444aac9b41bd/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"c59ad8ba-4579-44ae-8e62-e21a376f437e","verdict":"uncertain","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The reading correctly credits the arXiv paper to Bálint Gyevnár and Simon DeDeo. It keeps the findings attributed to the authors with phrasing such as 'they report' and 'the authors say', rather than presenting them as established fact.","excerpt":"Authors:Bálint Gyevnár, Simon DeDeo"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"uncertain","explanation":"The summary is faithful, but a non-specialist cannot readily follow it. Lean, which the study centers on, is never identified as a formal proof language or proof assistant. Proof formalization, densely connected proof centers and regularize toward baseline are also left opaque, so a reader cannot see what the agents' preferences mean. Smallest repair: add a plain gloss of Lean (or a term-library tooltip, if one exists) and briefly explain the other terms in the text. Minor omissions: the surface syntax versus deeper semantics question and the scale of 4.7M definitions across more than 6K commits.","excerpt":"On a set of nine major human collaborations in Lean with 4.7M definitions across more than 6K commits"},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The originalPublished value of 2026-11-04 matches the arXiv v1 submission date. The feed date of 2026-11-06 is later, as expected.","excerpt":"[Submitted on 4 Nov 2026]"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"Each claim matches the abstract, and the excerpts are exact. The framing that the differences matter as AI produces more proofs is supported by the abstract's proof-abundance line. The question and limitations correctly flag that the evidence is only the abstract and that generality is unknown. They invent no benefits or costs.","excerpt":"Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have ushered in a new age of proof abundance"},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified arXiv abstract page for this paper. It is the direct original source.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-09T00:00:58.830Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}