{"id":"c5d34d807e7ae39d8ab76579991276b9d8c256c108ea696f1e9646f1e34d13b7","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Base Models Can Detect Hidden Intentions that Prompted Classifiers Miss","argument":"In an arXiv cs.AI abstract, Oz Amram argues that a base pre-trained model can detect subliminal signals in outputs that prompted classifiers—including the generating model—miss. His method, persona-header likelihood evaluation (PHLE), evaluates how likely those outputs are under the base model with an appropriate header. Amram presents the results as evidence for the Persona Selection Model (PSM), which proposes that post-training selects a persona learned during pre-training.\n\nAmram describes examples where PHLE distinguishes number sequences associated with “You love owls” versus “You love eagles,” and answers from a model with a secret desire to harm the user, filtered to remove noticeable misalignment, versus answers produced with no system prompt. He says prompted classifiers remain near chance in both cases. He also reports that signals partially persist across model families.\n\nAmram says the method may help audit models’ hidden objectives. The abstract does not establish how reliably PHLE works beyond the reported examples or whether it can detect hidden objectives in deployed systems. How well does PHLE perform across a broader range of models and hidden objectives?","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract, not the paper’s full methods or results; it does not provide performance measurements beyond saying prompted classifiers remain near chance in the reported examples. The abstract does not establish how reliably PHLE works beyond the examples described or whether it can detect hidden objectives in deployed systems.","speaker":{"name":"Amram, Oz","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Base Models Can Detect Hidden Intentions that Prompted Classifiers Miss","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","publishedAt":"2026-10-26","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"Amram proposes persona-header likelihood evaluation (PHLE), which uses the base pre-trained model with an appropriate header to decode and classify subliminal signals in outputs.","excerpt":"by evaluating the likelihood of such outputs under the base pre-trained model with an appropriate header, a method I call persona-header likelihood evaluation (PHLE), one can decode these subliminal signals and classify between them.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"In the examples described, PHLE distinguishes number sequences associated with prompts expressing love for owls versus eagles, and filtered answers associated with a secret desire to harm the user versus no system prompt.","excerpt":"PHLE distinguishes number sequences generated by a post-trained model prompted with \"You love owls\" from those prompted with \"You love eagles\", and distinguishes answers from a model with a secret desire to harm the user, filtered to remove any noticeable misalignment, from those of a model with no","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Amram reports that prompted classifiers, including the generating model itself, remain near chance on both examples.","excerpt":"In both cases prompted classifiers, including the generating model itself, remain near chance.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Amram reports that the signal partially persists across model families, with Qwen and Olmo base models reading signals generated by the other family.","excerpt":"The signal partially persists across model families, with the Qwen base model reading signals generated by Olmo and vice versa.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Amram presents the results as evidence for a non-trivial prediction of the Persona Selection Model (PSM), and says the method may be useful for auditing models’ hidden objectives.","excerpt":"This is evidence for a non-trivial prediction of the PSM, and the method may be practically useful for auditing the hidden objectives of models.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","checkedAt":"2026-11-14T00:28:08.478Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How well does PHLE perform across a broader range of models and hidden objectives?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: Base Models Can Detect Hidden Intentions that Prompted Classifiers Miss","summary":"In an arXiv cs.AI abstract, Oz Amram argues that a base pre-trained model can detect subliminal signals in outputs that prompted classifiers—including the generating model—miss. His method, persona-header likelihood evaluation (PHLE), evaluates how likely those outputs are under the base model with an appropriate header. Amram presents the results as evidence for the Persona Selection Model (PSM), which proposes that post-training selects a persona learned during pre-training.\n\nAmram describes examples where PHLE distinguishes number sequences associated with “You love owls” versus “You love eagles,” and answers from a model with a secret desire to harm the user, filtered to remove noticeable misalignment, versus answers produced with no system prompt. He says prompted classifiers remain near chance in both cases. He also reports that signals partially persist across model families.\n\nAmram says the method may help audit models’ hidden objectives. The abstract does not establish how reliably PHLE works beyond the reported examples or whether it can detect hidden objectives in deployed systems. How well does PHLE perform across a broader range of models and hidden objectives?","question":"How well does PHLE perform across a broader range of models and hidden objectives?","claims":[{"text":"Amram proposes persona-header likelihood evaluation (PHLE), which uses the base pre-trained model with an appropriate header to decode and classify subliminal signals in outputs.","excerpt":"by evaluating the likelihood of such outputs under the base pre-trained model with an appropriate header, a method I call persona-header likelihood evaluation (PHLE), one can decode these subliminal signals and classify between them.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"In the examples described, PHLE distinguishes number sequences associated with prompts expressing love for owls versus eagles, and filtered answers associated with a secret desire to harm the user versus no system prompt.","excerpt":"PHLE distinguishes number sequences generated by a post-trained model prompted with \"You love owls\" from those prompted with \"You love eagles\", and distinguishes answers from a model with a secret desire to harm the user, filtered to remove any noticeable misalignment, from those of a model with no","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Amram reports that prompted classifiers, including the generating model itself, remain near chance on both examples.","excerpt":"In both cases prompted classifiers, including the generating model itself, remain near chance.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Amram reports that the signal partially persists across model families, with Qwen and Olmo base models reading signals generated by the other family.","excerpt":"The signal partially persists across model families, with the Qwen base model reading signals generated by Olmo and vice versa.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Amram presents the results as evidence for a non-trivial prediction of the Persona Selection Model (PSM), and says the method may be useful for auditing models’ hidden objectives.","excerpt":"This is evidence for a non-trivial prediction of the PSM, and the method may be practically useful for auditing the hidden objectives of models.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract, not the paper’s full methods or results; it does not provide performance measurements beyond saying prompted classifiers remain near chance in the reported examples.","The abstract does not establish how reliably PHLE works beyond the examples described or whether it can detect hidden objectives in deployed systems."],"mediaId":"d0b21eb3f0a3ae8b38e22e3609719c36d8d7f08b051c22ac6175a9eb4a157abf","correctionReason":null,"id":"c5d34d807e7ae39d8ab76579991276b9d8c256c108ea696f1e9646f1e34d13b7","publicationId":"e58f53b4-f472-4006-8ad4-e3ff42ed51c3","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","sourceTitle":"Base Models Can Detect Hidden Intentions that Prompted Classifiers Miss","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-26","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-28T05:46:42.562Z","createdAt":"2026-11-13T22:20:23.496Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"d0b21eb3f0a3ae8b38e22e3609719c36d8d7f08b051c22ac6175a9eb4a157abf","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-10-30T21:02:15.668Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","checkedAt":"2026-11-14T00:28:08.478Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"d0b21eb3f0a3ae8b38e22e3609719c36d8d7f08b051c22ac6175a9eb4a157abf","confidence":0.83,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"046014d41f23ea9a8b8f72774a5644d6b450c5cf73fd0d879bc54a246ced5a4d","decidedAt":"2026-10-30T21:02:19.736Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"8229dcd90c8e214fe63674d955094873f227b5718b31a8168fd942941de4ad3d","observationId":"70f96dc15c52125c4cfdf5fc81beedfc7c42a9aee1b3d84ac282f188e1ac568d","retrievedAt":"2026-10-30T21:02:15.373Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"2676ee84-9e1d-46c4-8957-28907a21706c"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"66c87bb4-e400-4e7b-8d6c-9b77a5344e5d"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-13T22:20:23.496Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Amram, Oz","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Amram, Oz","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Amram, Oz","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"43ac096c3ebf1a6e931f578a7feaee9e892c6f9c6af019002fd8dfb051f0c9b6:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-10-30T21:02:15.373Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"43ac096c3ebf1a6e931f578a7feaee9e892c6f9c6af019002fd8dfb051f0c9b6","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","contentSha256":"ebcf003c8f013e4e7864d573d1574d8f90a188d9fb0a15a97f228a2881c10a1c","textHash":"8229dcd90c8e214fe63674d955094873f227b5718b31a8168fd942941de4ad3d","observedAt":"2026-10-30T21:02:15.373Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":1,"returned":1,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","snapshotId":"43ac096c3ebf1a6e931f578a7feaee9e892c6f9c6af019002fd8dfb051f0c9b6","contentSha256":"ebcf003c8f013e4e7864d573d1574d8f90a188d9fb0a15a97f228a2881c10a1c","textHash":"8229dcd90c8e214fe63674d955094873f227b5718b31a8168fd942941de4ad3d","observedAt":"2026-10-30T21:02:15.373Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":42,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/c5d34d807e7ae39d8ab76579991276b9d8c256c108ea696f1e9646f1e34d13b7/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-base-models-can-detect-hidden-intentions-that-c5d34d80","formats":{"html":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-base-models-can-detect-hidden-intentions-that-c5d34d80","markdown":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-base-models-can-detect-hidden-intentions-that-c5d34d80.md","json":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-base-models-can-detect-hidden-intentions-that-c5d34d80.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"conditions":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[{"id":"term-pre-training","name":"Pre-training","explanation":"A model's initial training on a large dataset, before further adaptation for particular uses.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#pre-training"},{"id":"term-ai-alignment","name":"AI alignment","explanation":"Research and practice aimed at making AI systems pursue the goals their builders and users intend.","referenceUrl":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_alignment"}],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"c5d34d807e7ae39d8ab76579991276b9d8c256c108ea696f1e9646f1e34d13b7","revision":"e58f53b4-f472-4006-8ad4-e3ff42ed51c3","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Base Models Can Detect Hidden Intentions that Prompted Classifiers Miss","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-base-models-can-detect-hidden-intentions-that-c5d34d80"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","revision":"8229dcd90c8e214fe63674d955094873f227b5718b31a8168fd942941de4ad3d","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Base Models Can Detect Hidden Intentions that Prompted Classifiers Miss","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"c5d34d807e7ae39d8ab76579991276b9d8c256c108ea696f1e9646f1e34d13b7","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Base Models Can Detect Hidden Intentions that Prompted Classifiers Miss","argument":"In an arXiv cs.AI abstract, Oz Amram argues that a base pre-trained model can detect subliminal signals in outputs that prompted classifiers—including the generating model—miss. His method, persona-header likelihood evaluation (PHLE), evaluates how likely those outputs are under the base model with an appropriate header. Amram presents the results as evidence for the Persona Selection Model (PSM), which proposes that post-training selects a persona learned during pre-training.\n\nAmram describes examples where PHLE distinguishes number sequences associated with “You love owls” versus “You love eagles,” and answers from a model with a secret desire to harm the user, filtered to remove noticeable misalignment, versus answers produced with no system prompt. He says prompted classifiers remain near chance in both cases. He also reports that signals partially persist across model families.\n\nAmram says the method may help audit models’ hidden objectives. The abstract does not establish how reliably PHLE works beyond the reported examples or whether it can detect hidden objectives in deployed systems. How well does PHLE perform across a broader range of models and hidden objectives?","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract, not the paper’s full methods or results; it does not provide performance measurements beyond saying prompted classifiers remain near chance in the reported examples. The abstract does not establish how reliably PHLE works beyond the examples described or whether it can detect hidden objectives in deployed systems.","speaker":{"name":"Amram, Oz","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Base Models Can Detect Hidden Intentions that Prompted Classifiers Miss","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","publishedAt":"2026-10-26","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"Amram proposes persona-header likelihood evaluation (PHLE), which uses the base pre-trained model with an appropriate header to decode and classify subliminal signals in outputs.","excerpt":"by evaluating the likelihood of such outputs under the base pre-trained model with an appropriate header, a method I call persona-header likelihood evaluation (PHLE), one can decode these subliminal signals and classify between them.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"In the examples described, PHLE distinguishes number sequences associated with prompts expressing love for owls versus eagles, and filtered answers associated with a secret desire to harm the user versus no system prompt.","excerpt":"PHLE distinguishes number sequences generated by a post-trained model prompted with \"You love owls\" from those prompted with \"You love eagles\", and distinguishes answers from a model with a secret desire to harm the user, filtered to remove any noticeable misalignment, from those of a model with no","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Amram reports that prompted classifiers, including the generating model itself, remain near chance on both examples.","excerpt":"In both cases prompted classifiers, including the generating model itself, remain near chance.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Amram reports that the signal partially persists across model families, with Qwen and Olmo base models reading signals generated by the other family.","excerpt":"The signal partially persists across model families, with the Qwen base model reading signals generated by Olmo and vice versa.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Amram presents the results as evidence for a non-trivial prediction of the Persona Selection Model (PSM), and says the method may be useful for auditing models’ hidden objectives.","excerpt":"This is evidence for a non-trivial prediction of the PSM, and the method may be practically useful for auditing the hidden objectives of models.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","checkedAt":"2026-11-14T00:28:08.478Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How well does PHLE perform across a broader range of models and hidden objectives?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: Base Models Can Detect Hidden Intentions that Prompted Classifiers Miss","summary":"In an arXiv cs.AI abstract, Oz Amram argues that a base pre-trained model can detect subliminal signals in outputs that prompted classifiers—including the generating model—miss. His method, persona-header likelihood evaluation (PHLE), evaluates how likely those outputs are under the base model with an appropriate header. Amram presents the results as evidence for the Persona Selection Model (PSM), which proposes that post-training selects a persona learned during pre-training.\n\nAmram describes examples where PHLE distinguishes number sequences associated with “You love owls” versus “You love eagles,” and answers from a model with a secret desire to harm the user, filtered to remove noticeable misalignment, versus answers produced with no system prompt. He says prompted classifiers remain near chance in both cases. He also reports that signals partially persist across model families.\n\nAmram says the method may help audit models’ hidden objectives. The abstract does not establish how reliably PHLE works beyond the reported examples or whether it can detect hidden objectives in deployed systems. How well does PHLE perform across a broader range of models and hidden objectives?","question":"How well does PHLE perform across a broader range of models and hidden objectives?","claims":[{"text":"Amram proposes persona-header likelihood evaluation (PHLE), which uses the base pre-trained model with an appropriate header to decode and classify subliminal signals in outputs.","excerpt":"by evaluating the likelihood of such outputs under the base pre-trained model with an appropriate header, a method I call persona-header likelihood evaluation (PHLE), one can decode these subliminal signals and classify between them.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"In the examples described, PHLE distinguishes number sequences associated with prompts expressing love for owls versus eagles, and filtered answers associated with a secret desire to harm the user versus no system prompt.","excerpt":"PHLE distinguishes number sequences generated by a post-trained model prompted with \"You love owls\" from those prompted with \"You love eagles\", and distinguishes answers from a model with a secret desire to harm the user, filtered to remove any noticeable misalignment, from those of a model with no","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Amram reports that prompted classifiers, including the generating model itself, remain near chance on both examples.","excerpt":"In both cases prompted classifiers, including the generating model itself, remain near chance.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Amram reports that the signal partially persists across model families, with Qwen and Olmo base models reading signals generated by the other family.","excerpt":"The signal partially persists across model families, with the Qwen base model reading signals generated by Olmo and vice versa.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Amram presents the results as evidence for a non-trivial prediction of the Persona Selection Model (PSM), and says the method may be useful for auditing models’ hidden objectives.","excerpt":"This is evidence for a non-trivial prediction of the PSM, and the method may be practically useful for auditing the hidden objectives of models.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract, not the paper’s full methods or results; it does not provide performance measurements beyond saying prompted classifiers remain near chance in the reported examples.","The abstract does not establish how reliably PHLE works beyond the examples described or whether it can detect hidden objectives in deployed systems."],"mediaId":"d0b21eb3f0a3ae8b38e22e3609719c36d8d7f08b051c22ac6175a9eb4a157abf","correctionReason":null,"id":"c5d34d807e7ae39d8ab76579991276b9d8c256c108ea696f1e9646f1e34d13b7","publicationId":"e58f53b4-f472-4006-8ad4-e3ff42ed51c3","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","sourceTitle":"Base Models Can Detect Hidden Intentions that Prompted Classifiers Miss","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-26","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-28T05:46:42.562Z","createdAt":"2026-11-13T22:20:23.496Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"d0b21eb3f0a3ae8b38e22e3609719c36d8d7f08b051c22ac6175a9eb4a157abf","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-10-30T21:02:15.668Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","checkedAt":"2026-11-14T00:28:08.478Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"d0b21eb3f0a3ae8b38e22e3609719c36d8d7f08b051c22ac6175a9eb4a157abf","confidence":0.83,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"046014d41f23ea9a8b8f72774a5644d6b450c5cf73fd0d879bc54a246ced5a4d","decidedAt":"2026-10-30T21:02:19.736Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"8229dcd90c8e214fe63674d955094873f227b5718b31a8168fd942941de4ad3d","observationId":"70f96dc15c52125c4cfdf5fc81beedfc7c42a9aee1b3d84ac282f188e1ac568d","retrievedAt":"2026-10-30T21:02:15.373Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"2676ee84-9e1d-46c4-8957-28907a21706c"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"66c87bb4-e400-4e7b-8d6c-9b77a5344e5d"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-13T22:20:23.496Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Amram, Oz","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Amram, Oz","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Amram, Oz","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"43ac096c3ebf1a6e931f578a7feaee9e892c6f9c6af019002fd8dfb051f0c9b6:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-10-30T21:02:15.373Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"43ac096c3ebf1a6e931f578a7feaee9e892c6f9c6af019002fd8dfb051f0c9b6","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","contentSha256":"ebcf003c8f013e4e7864d573d1574d8f90a188d9fb0a15a97f228a2881c10a1c","textHash":"8229dcd90c8e214fe63674d955094873f227b5718b31a8168fd942941de4ad3d","observedAt":"2026-10-30T21:02:15.373Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":1,"returned":1,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36202","snapshotId":"43ac096c3ebf1a6e931f578a7feaee9e892c6f9c6af019002fd8dfb051f0c9b6","contentSha256":"ebcf003c8f013e4e7864d573d1574d8f90a188d9fb0a15a97f228a2881c10a1c","textHash":"8229dcd90c8e214fe63674d955094873f227b5718b31a8168fd942941de4ad3d","observedAt":"2026-10-30T21:02:15.373Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":42,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/c5d34d807e7ae39d8ab76579991276b9d8c256c108ea696f1e9646f1e34d13b7/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"e58f53b4-f472-4006-8ad4-e3ff42ed51c3","verdict":"uncertain","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The draft correctly attributes the work to sole author Oz Amram and frames the claims as his. One minor point: the draft uses 'His'/'he', which the source does not state. Using 'Amram' throughout would be the smallest repair. The arXiv listing's primary category is cs.LG, but it is cross-listed to cs.AI, so 'arXiv cs.AI' is acceptable.","excerpt":"Authors:Oz Amram"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"uncertain","explanation":"The draft is faithful but hard to follow without specialist background. It never explains 'subliminal signals.' It also drops the stake that makes them matter: under subliminal learning, models trained on outputs such as number strings inherit the hidden traits. Several central terms are also unexplained: base pre-trained model, post-training, header, prompted classifiers and near chance. Smallest repair: add one plain-language sentence on the subliminal-learning premise and briefly gloss these terms, preferably through tooltips.","excerpt":"models can impart covert signals (like \"love of owls\") into semantically unrelated outputs like strings of numbers, and that students trained on these outputs inherit those traits"},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The originalPublished date of 2026-10-26 matches the v1 submission date. The feed date of 2026-10-29 is later and is correctly not used.","excerpt":"[Submitted on 26 Oct 2026]"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"Every claim matches the abstract's wording. The auditing use is kept as the source's 'may be practically useful.' The limitations and the closing question correctly note what the abstract alone cannot establish. No benefits are invented and no score is overstated.","excerpt":"the method may be practically useful for auditing the hidden objectives of models"},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified direct link to the original arXiv abstract page. It is the most direct way to reach the source.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-13T22:20:23.496Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}