{"id":"56760be9c63d84f461d54b9cc02c39958a3a98dabbf72303f5fa0c15a2722af3","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Conformal Fair Decoding for Large Language Model Recommenders","argument":"Ziwei Wu and Jingrui He propose Fair-Rec, an item-level decoding framework for controlling fairness in recommendations when model weights and full-vocabulary logits are unavailable. Their concern is that changing a protected attribute while holding interaction history fixed can alter the semantic content of recommended items. Fair-Rec uses an offline-calibrated semantic-disparity threshold to control which candidates enter recommendation lists. Its hard variant filters candidates against the threshold; its soft variant trades off candidate likelihood and disparity while adapting a penalty using observed violations. Under an explicit uniform enforceability assumption, the authors establish a pathwise O(1/T) upper bound on the soft decoder’s excess empirical violation rate. In experiments on MovieLens-1M and Amazon Movies & TV using Qwen3-8B and Llama3.1-8B-Instruct, they report that the soft variant lowers measured counterfactual disparity relative to zero-shot recommendation, UP5, and FACTER, while retaining competitive HR@10 and NDCG@10. The results are limited to the reported datasets and models; the abstract does not establish how the method performs elsewhere.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The evidence is the arXiv abstract; it does not provide the paper’s methods, detailed results, or definitions of its evaluation measures. The reported experiments are on MovieLens-1M and Amazon Movies & TV using Qwen3-8B and Llama3.1-8B-Instruct; the abstract does not establish results for other datasets or models. The stated theoretical bound depends on an explicit uniform enforceability assumption; the abstract does not specify when that assumption holds.","speaker":{"name":"Wu, Ziwei, He, Jingrui","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Conformal Fair Decoding for Large Language Model Recommenders","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","publishedAt":"2026-11-06","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"Wu and He propose Fair-Rec, an item-level decoding framework intended to control fairness when model weights and full-vocabulary logits are unavailable.","excerpt":"We propose Fair- Rec, an item-level decoding framework that uses an offline-calibrated semantic-disparity threshold","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Fair-Rec has a hard variant that filters candidates and a soft variant that balances candidate likelihood and disparity while adapting its penalty based on observed violations.","excerpt":"A hard variant filters candidates against the threshold; a soft variant trades off candidate likelihood and disparity while adapting a penalty using observed violations.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Under an explicit uniform enforceability assumption, the authors establish a pathwise O(1/T) upper bound on the soft decoder’s excess empirical violation rate.","excerpt":"Under an explicit uniform enforceability assumption, we establish a pathwise O(1/T) upper bound on the excess empirical violation rate of the soft decoder.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"In experiments on two datasets using two language models, the authors report lower measured counterfactual disparity for the soft variant than for three comparison methods, with competitive HR@10 and NDCG@10.","excerpt":"the soft variant lowers measured counterfactual disparity relative to zero- =shot recommendation, UP5, and FACTER, while retaining competitive HR@10 and NDCG@10.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T15:48:16.174Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"When does the uniform enforceability assumption hold for recommendation lists?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: Conformal Fair Decoding for Large Language Model Recommenders","summary":"Ziwei Wu and Jingrui He propose Fair-Rec, an item-level decoding framework for controlling fairness in recommendations when model weights and full-vocabulary logits are unavailable. Their concern is that changing a protected attribute while holding interaction history fixed can alter the semantic content of recommended items. Fair-Rec uses an offline-calibrated semantic-disparity threshold to control which candidates enter recommendation lists. Its hard variant filters candidates against the threshold; its soft variant trades off candidate likelihood and disparity while adapting a penalty using observed violations. Under an explicit uniform enforceability assumption, the authors establish a pathwise O(1/T) upper bound on the soft decoder’s excess empirical violation rate. In experiments on MovieLens-1M and Amazon Movies & TV using Qwen3-8B and Llama3.1-8B-Instruct, they report that the soft variant lowers measured counterfactual disparity relative to zero-shot recommendation, UP5, and FACTER, while retaining competitive HR@10 and NDCG@10. The results are limited to the reported datasets and models; the abstract does not establish how the method performs elsewhere.","question":"When does the uniform enforceability assumption hold for recommendation lists?","claims":[{"text":"Wu and He propose Fair-Rec, an item-level decoding framework intended to control fairness when model weights and full-vocabulary logits are unavailable.","excerpt":"We propose Fair- Rec, an item-level decoding framework that uses an offline-calibrated semantic-disparity threshold","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Fair-Rec has a hard variant that filters candidates and a soft variant that balances candidate likelihood and disparity while adapting its penalty based on observed violations.","excerpt":"A hard variant filters candidates against the threshold; a soft variant trades off candidate likelihood and disparity while adapting a penalty using observed violations.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Under an explicit uniform enforceability assumption, the authors establish a pathwise O(1/T) upper bound on the soft decoder’s excess empirical violation rate.","excerpt":"Under an explicit uniform enforceability assumption, we establish a pathwise O(1/T) upper bound on the excess empirical violation rate of the soft decoder.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"In experiments on two datasets using two language models, the authors report lower measured counterfactual disparity for the soft variant than for three comparison methods, with competitive HR@10 and NDCG@10.","excerpt":"the soft variant lowers measured counterfactual disparity relative to zero- =shot recommendation, UP5, and FACTER, while retaining competitive HR@10 and NDCG@10.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The evidence is the arXiv abstract; it does not provide the paper’s methods, detailed results, or definitions of its evaluation measures.","The reported experiments are on MovieLens-1M and Amazon Movies & TV using Qwen3-8B and Llama3.1-8B-Instruct; the abstract does not establish results for other datasets or models.","The stated theoretical bound depends on an explicit uniform enforceability assumption; the abstract does not specify when that assumption holds."],"mediaId":"8981b2ca9c52b1f8af1dac48b651d1c1774f909635bfe6b97ca52c95daca4940","correctionReason":null,"id":"56760be9c63d84f461d54b9cc02c39958a3a98dabbf72303f5fa0c15a2722af3","publicationId":"d67b61e7-17a3-4ea3-856b-1cf89207f15c","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","sourceTitle":"Conformal Fair Decoding for Large Language Model Recommenders","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-06","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-10T08:39:38.747Z","createdAt":"2026-11-10T15:32:57.123Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"8981b2ca9c52b1f8af1dac48b651d1c1774f909635bfe6b97ca52c95daca4940","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T15:31:52.081Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T15:48:16.174Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"8981b2ca9c52b1f8af1dac48b651d1c1774f909635bfe6b97ca52c95daca4940","confidence":0.78,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"9838dbb707f08372d34812d0c7771ca9525a2e57167c7f5b4a3affc1abd46f6a","decidedAt":"2026-11-10T15:31:54.012Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"722f23058a7ad5ccf8f840970bcbf3b12f5aeb9c45433a7e102754ba854af61c","observationId":"900faa291d1d96375b18df570914e65b714601f9dd96b150c5fef385b2e61213","retrievedAt":"2026-11-10T15:31:51.796Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"8da6fea6-b42c-4451-84ea-fa70b6eb0b4c"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"20d724e0-7dd2-46f7-8b06-0c75e890b634"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-10T15:32:57.123Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Wu, Ziwei","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"He, Jingrui","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Wu, Ziwei","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Wu, Ziwei","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"ab8dcc4309b6853b7886efa09c27c24c7df5cbfeadc80bd9450e4b81f898a543:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T15:48:16.174Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"ab8dcc4309b6853b7886efa09c27c24c7df5cbfeadc80bd9450e4b81f898a543","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","contentSha256":"ae32427bed22dd07e122c186207a4c6598e19e2245a2a23d70457508b463adbe","textHash":"722f23058a7ad5ccf8f840970bcbf3b12f5aeb9c45433a7e102754ba854af61c","observedAt":"2026-11-10T15:48:16.174Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"He, Jingrui","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"He, Jingrui","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"ab8dcc4309b6853b7886efa09c27c24c7df5cbfeadc80bd9450e4b81f898a543:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T15:48:16.174Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"ab8dcc4309b6853b7886efa09c27c24c7df5cbfeadc80bd9450e4b81f898a543","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","contentSha256":"ae32427bed22dd07e122c186207a4c6598e19e2245a2a23d70457508b463adbe","textHash":"722f23058a7ad5ccf8f840970bcbf3b12f5aeb9c45433a7e102754ba854af61c","observedAt":"2026-11-10T15:48:16.174Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":2,"returned":2,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","snapshotId":"ab8dcc4309b6853b7886efa09c27c24c7df5cbfeadc80bd9450e4b81f898a543","contentSha256":"ae32427bed22dd07e122c186207a4c6598e19e2245a2a23d70457508b463adbe","textHash":"722f23058a7ad5ccf8f840970bcbf3b12f5aeb9c45433a7e102754ba854af61c","observedAt":"2026-11-10T15:48:16.174Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":40,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/56760be9c63d84f461d54b9cc02c39958a3a98dabbf72303f5fa0c15a2722af3/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-conformal-fair-decoding-for-large-language-model-56760be9","formats":{"html":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-conformal-fair-decoding-for-large-language-model-56760be9","markdown":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-conformal-fair-decoding-for-large-language-model-56760be9.md","json":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-conformal-fair-decoding-for-large-language-model-56760be9.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[{"id":"term-llm","name":"Large language model","explanation":"A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#large-language-model"},{"id":"term-model-weights","name":"Model weights","explanation":"The learned numbers that make up a trained model; publishing them lets others run it.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#weight"},{"id":"term-counterfactual","name":"Counterfactual","explanation":"An argument or scenario that considers what would have resulted if events had gone differently from how they actually did, such as if a policy had never been adopted; as an adjective, relating to this kind of thinking about what did not happen but could have.","referenceUrl":"https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/counterfactual"},{"id":"term-zero-shot","name":"Zero-shot","explanation":"Doing a task without worked examples (zero-shot) or with only a few examples given in the prompt (few-shot).","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#zero-shot-prompting"}],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"56760be9c63d84f461d54b9cc02c39958a3a98dabbf72303f5fa0c15a2722af3","revision":"d67b61e7-17a3-4ea3-856b-1cf89207f15c","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Conformal Fair Decoding for Large Language Model Recommenders","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-conformal-fair-decoding-for-large-language-model-56760be9"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","revision":"722f23058a7ad5ccf8f840970bcbf3b12f5aeb9c45433a7e102754ba854af61c","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Conformal Fair Decoding for Large Language Model Recommenders","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"56760be9c63d84f461d54b9cc02c39958a3a98dabbf72303f5fa0c15a2722af3","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Conformal Fair Decoding for Large Language Model Recommenders","argument":"Ziwei Wu and Jingrui He propose Fair-Rec, an item-level decoding framework for controlling fairness in recommendations when model weights and full-vocabulary logits are unavailable. Their concern is that changing a protected attribute while holding interaction history fixed can alter the semantic content of recommended items. Fair-Rec uses an offline-calibrated semantic-disparity threshold to control which candidates enter recommendation lists. Its hard variant filters candidates against the threshold; its soft variant trades off candidate likelihood and disparity while adapting a penalty using observed violations. Under an explicit uniform enforceability assumption, the authors establish a pathwise O(1/T) upper bound on the soft decoder’s excess empirical violation rate. In experiments on MovieLens-1M and Amazon Movies & TV using Qwen3-8B and Llama3.1-8B-Instruct, they report that the soft variant lowers measured counterfactual disparity relative to zero-shot recommendation, UP5, and FACTER, while retaining competitive HR@10 and NDCG@10. The results are limited to the reported datasets and models; the abstract does not establish how the method performs elsewhere.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The evidence is the arXiv abstract; it does not provide the paper’s methods, detailed results, or definitions of its evaluation measures. The reported experiments are on MovieLens-1M and Amazon Movies & TV using Qwen3-8B and Llama3.1-8B-Instruct; the abstract does not establish results for other datasets or models. The stated theoretical bound depends on an explicit uniform enforceability assumption; the abstract does not specify when that assumption holds.","speaker":{"name":"Wu, Ziwei, He, Jingrui","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Conformal Fair Decoding for Large Language Model Recommenders","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","publishedAt":"2026-11-06","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"Wu and He propose Fair-Rec, an item-level decoding framework intended to control fairness when model weights and full-vocabulary logits are unavailable.","excerpt":"We propose Fair- Rec, an item-level decoding framework that uses an offline-calibrated semantic-disparity threshold","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Fair-Rec has a hard variant that filters candidates and a soft variant that balances candidate likelihood and disparity while adapting its penalty based on observed violations.","excerpt":"A hard variant filters candidates against the threshold; a soft variant trades off candidate likelihood and disparity while adapting a penalty using observed violations.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Under an explicit uniform enforceability assumption, the authors establish a pathwise O(1/T) upper bound on the soft decoder’s excess empirical violation rate.","excerpt":"Under an explicit uniform enforceability assumption, we establish a pathwise O(1/T) upper bound on the excess empirical violation rate of the soft decoder.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"In experiments on two datasets using two language models, the authors report lower measured counterfactual disparity for the soft variant than for three comparison methods, with competitive HR@10 and NDCG@10.","excerpt":"the soft variant lowers measured counterfactual disparity relative to zero- =shot recommendation, UP5, and FACTER, while retaining competitive HR@10 and NDCG@10.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T15:48:16.174Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"When does the uniform enforceability assumption hold for recommendation lists?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: Conformal Fair Decoding for Large Language Model Recommenders","summary":"Ziwei Wu and Jingrui He propose Fair-Rec, an item-level decoding framework for controlling fairness in recommendations when model weights and full-vocabulary logits are unavailable. Their concern is that changing a protected attribute while holding interaction history fixed can alter the semantic content of recommended items. Fair-Rec uses an offline-calibrated semantic-disparity threshold to control which candidates enter recommendation lists. Its hard variant filters candidates against the threshold; its soft variant trades off candidate likelihood and disparity while adapting a penalty using observed violations. Under an explicit uniform enforceability assumption, the authors establish a pathwise O(1/T) upper bound on the soft decoder’s excess empirical violation rate. In experiments on MovieLens-1M and Amazon Movies & TV using Qwen3-8B and Llama3.1-8B-Instruct, they report that the soft variant lowers measured counterfactual disparity relative to zero-shot recommendation, UP5, and FACTER, while retaining competitive HR@10 and NDCG@10. The results are limited to the reported datasets and models; the abstract does not establish how the method performs elsewhere.","question":"When does the uniform enforceability assumption hold for recommendation lists?","claims":[{"text":"Wu and He propose Fair-Rec, an item-level decoding framework intended to control fairness when model weights and full-vocabulary logits are unavailable.","excerpt":"We propose Fair- Rec, an item-level decoding framework that uses an offline-calibrated semantic-disparity threshold","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Fair-Rec has a hard variant that filters candidates and a soft variant that balances candidate likelihood and disparity while adapting its penalty based on observed violations.","excerpt":"A hard variant filters candidates against the threshold; a soft variant trades off candidate likelihood and disparity while adapting a penalty using observed violations.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Under an explicit uniform enforceability assumption, the authors establish a pathwise O(1/T) upper bound on the soft decoder’s excess empirical violation rate.","excerpt":"Under an explicit uniform enforceability assumption, we establish a pathwise O(1/T) upper bound on the excess empirical violation rate of the soft decoder.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"In experiments on two datasets using two language models, the authors report lower measured counterfactual disparity for the soft variant than for three comparison methods, with competitive HR@10 and NDCG@10.","excerpt":"the soft variant lowers measured counterfactual disparity relative to zero- =shot recommendation, UP5, and FACTER, while retaining competitive HR@10 and NDCG@10.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The evidence is the arXiv abstract; it does not provide the paper’s methods, detailed results, or definitions of its evaluation measures.","The reported experiments are on MovieLens-1M and Amazon Movies & TV using Qwen3-8B and Llama3.1-8B-Instruct; the abstract does not establish results for other datasets or models.","The stated theoretical bound depends on an explicit uniform enforceability assumption; the abstract does not specify when that assumption holds."],"mediaId":"8981b2ca9c52b1f8af1dac48b651d1c1774f909635bfe6b97ca52c95daca4940","correctionReason":null,"id":"56760be9c63d84f461d54b9cc02c39958a3a98dabbf72303f5fa0c15a2722af3","publicationId":"d67b61e7-17a3-4ea3-856b-1cf89207f15c","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","sourceTitle":"Conformal Fair Decoding for Large Language Model Recommenders","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-06","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-10T08:39:38.747Z","createdAt":"2026-11-10T15:32:57.123Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"8981b2ca9c52b1f8af1dac48b651d1c1774f909635bfe6b97ca52c95daca4940","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T15:31:52.081Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T15:48:16.174Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"8981b2ca9c52b1f8af1dac48b651d1c1774f909635bfe6b97ca52c95daca4940","confidence":0.78,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"9838dbb707f08372d34812d0c7771ca9525a2e57167c7f5b4a3affc1abd46f6a","decidedAt":"2026-11-10T15:31:54.012Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"722f23058a7ad5ccf8f840970bcbf3b12f5aeb9c45433a7e102754ba854af61c","observationId":"900faa291d1d96375b18df570914e65b714601f9dd96b150c5fef385b2e61213","retrievedAt":"2026-11-10T15:31:51.796Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"8da6fea6-b42c-4451-84ea-fa70b6eb0b4c"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"20d724e0-7dd2-46f7-8b06-0c75e890b634"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-10T15:32:57.123Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Wu, Ziwei","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"He, Jingrui","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Wu, Ziwei","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Wu, Ziwei","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"ab8dcc4309b6853b7886efa09c27c24c7df5cbfeadc80bd9450e4b81f898a543:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T15:48:16.174Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"ab8dcc4309b6853b7886efa09c27c24c7df5cbfeadc80bd9450e4b81f898a543","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","contentSha256":"ae32427bed22dd07e122c186207a4c6598e19e2245a2a23d70457508b463adbe","textHash":"722f23058a7ad5ccf8f840970bcbf3b12f5aeb9c45433a7e102754ba854af61c","observedAt":"2026-11-10T15:48:16.174Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"He, Jingrui","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"He, Jingrui","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"ab8dcc4309b6853b7886efa09c27c24c7df5cbfeadc80bd9450e4b81f898a543:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T15:48:16.174Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"ab8dcc4309b6853b7886efa09c27c24c7df5cbfeadc80bd9450e4b81f898a543","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","contentSha256":"ae32427bed22dd07e122c186207a4c6598e19e2245a2a23d70457508b463adbe","textHash":"722f23058a7ad5ccf8f840970bcbf3b12f5aeb9c45433a7e102754ba854af61c","observedAt":"2026-11-10T15:48:16.174Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":2,"returned":2,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10285","snapshotId":"ab8dcc4309b6853b7886efa09c27c24c7df5cbfeadc80bd9450e4b81f898a543","contentSha256":"ae32427bed22dd07e122c186207a4c6598e19e2245a2a23d70457508b463adbe","textHash":"722f23058a7ad5ccf8f840970bcbf3b12f5aeb9c45433a7e102754ba854af61c","observedAt":"2026-11-10T15:48:16.174Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":40,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/56760be9c63d84f461d54b9cc02c39958a3a98dabbf72303f5fa0c15a2722af3/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"d67b61e7-17a3-4ea3-856b-1cf89207f15c","verdict":"uncertain","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The draft correctly attributes the proposal, theoretical bound and experimental results to authors Ziwei Wu and Jingrui He. It frames these as the authors' claims, not established facts.","excerpt":"Authors:Ziwei Wu, Jingrui He"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"uncertain","explanation":"The draft is faithful but mostly restates the abstract. Central terms that carry the paper's significance go unexplained for a general reader: 'model weights and full-vocabulary logits are unavailable' (meaning the method works without internal access to the model), 'protected attribute', 'counterfactual disparity', 'pathwise O(1/T) upper bound' and 'HR@10 and NDCG@10'. The question also relies on the unexplained term 'uniform enforceability assumption'. Smallest repair: add plain-language glosses or term-library tooltips for these terms, and say in one sentence why the closed-model setting matters.","excerpt":"We study fairness control when model weights and full-vocabulary logits are unavailable."},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"originalPublished is 2026-11-06, which matches the arXiv v1 submission date. It is not the later feed date of 2026-11-10.","excerpt":"[Submitted on 6 Nov 2026]"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"Each claim matches the abstract. This covers the hard and soft variants, the bound being conditional on the stated assumption, and results limited to two datasets and two models against three baselines. The limitations accurately note that the evidence is abstract-only. No benefits or costs are invented.","excerpt":"Under an explicit uniform enforceability assumption, we establish a pathwise O(1/T) upper bound on the excess empirical violation rate of the soft decoder."},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper. It is the most direct way to access the source.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-10T15:32:57.123Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}