{"id":"3bddb12c530f1643698c71b66875651f7ef3d98992870648d1774ade81f5bcaf","title":"arXiv cs.AI: EfficientNet scaling for retinal disease classification","argument":"Author Shkelqim Sherifi asks whether EfficientNet’s natural-image scaling hierarchy carries over to retinal disease classification from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). The study compares eight ImageNet-pretrained EfficientNet variants on the Kermany dataset, all evaluated at 224x224. Sherifi reports that test accuracy did not rise consistently with model size: B1 achieved the highest accuracy and Drusen F1, while B7 showed a secondary accuracy recovery at greater model size and CPU latency. Drusen had the lowest F1 across the variants, and the accuracy-to-parameter ratio fell as model size increased. The paper says the OCT accuracy ranking differed from the reported ImageNet hierarchy, where B7 ranked first. Its findings make the paper’s point specific: scaling behavior in this transfer-learning setup depended on the task and protocol, rather than consistently favoring the largest model. The paper cautions that results are conditional on the supplied split because cross-partition duplicates have not been independently audited.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The study evaluates the models at a fixed 224x224 resolution on the Kermany dataset; its findings do not establish how other datasets or protocols would compare. The author states that cross-partition duplicates have not been independently audited and that results are conditional on the supplied split. The evidence is the arXiv abstract; it does not provide further detail on the supplied split or the duplicate-audit procedure.","speaker":{"name":"Sherifi, Shkelqim","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Within-Family EfficientNet Scaling under Fixed-Resolution Transfer Learning for Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Retinal Disease Classification","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","publishedAt":"2026-11-04","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The study compared eight ImageNet-pretrained EfficientNet variants on the Kermany dataset at 224x224 for four-class SD-OCT classification.","excerpt":"Eight ImageNet-pretrained variants (4.05-64.10M instantiated backbone parameters) were evaluated at 224x224 on the Kermany dataset.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The author reports that test accuracy varied non-monotonically, with B1 highest and B7 achieving a secondary recovery at greater model size and CPU latency.","excerpt":"Test accuracy varied non-monotonically from 95.93% (B0) to 96.95% (B1); B7 achieved 96.73%.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The author reports that Drusen had the lowest F1 across variants, while B1 had the highest Drusen F1.","excerpt":"B1 had the highest accuracy and Drusen F1 (0.8780), while B7 had Drusen F1 of 0.8720 and the highest Drusen recall (0.9177). Drusen had the lowest F1 across all variants","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The paper says its results are conditional on the supplied split because cross-partition duplicates have not been independently audited.","excerpt":"As cross-partition duplicates have not been independently audited, results are conditional on the supplied split.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The paper reports that the OCT accuracy ranking differed from the reported ImageNet hierarchy, where B7 ranked first.","excerpt":"The OCT accuracy ranking differed from the reported ImageNet hierarchy, where B7 ranked first.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T19:58:09.109Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How would an independent audit of cross-partition duplicates affect the reported results?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: EfficientNet scaling for retinal disease classification","summary":"Author Shkelqim Sherifi asks whether EfficientNet’s natural-image scaling hierarchy carries over to retinal disease classification from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). The study compares eight ImageNet-pretrained EfficientNet variants on the Kermany dataset, all evaluated at 224x224. Sherifi reports that test accuracy did not rise consistently with model size: B1 achieved the highest accuracy and Drusen F1, while B7 showed a secondary accuracy recovery at greater model size and CPU latency. Drusen had the lowest F1 across the variants, and the accuracy-to-parameter ratio fell as model size increased. The paper says the OCT accuracy ranking differed from the reported ImageNet hierarchy, where B7 ranked first. Its findings make the paper’s point specific: scaling behavior in this transfer-learning setup depended on the task and protocol, rather than consistently favoring the largest model. The paper cautions that results are conditional on the supplied split because cross-partition duplicates have not been independently audited.","question":"How would an independent audit of cross-partition duplicates affect the reported results?","claims":[{"text":"The study compared eight ImageNet-pretrained EfficientNet variants on the Kermany dataset at 224x224 for four-class SD-OCT classification.","excerpt":"Eight ImageNet-pretrained variants (4.05-64.10M instantiated backbone parameters) were evaluated at 224x224 on the Kermany dataset.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The author reports that test accuracy varied non-monotonically, with B1 highest and B7 achieving a secondary recovery at greater model size and CPU latency.","excerpt":"Test accuracy varied non-monotonically from 95.93% (B0) to 96.95% (B1); B7 achieved 96.73%.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The author reports that Drusen had the lowest F1 across variants, while B1 had the highest Drusen F1.","excerpt":"B1 had the highest accuracy and Drusen F1 (0.8780), while B7 had Drusen F1 of 0.8720 and the highest Drusen recall (0.9177). Drusen had the lowest F1 across all variants","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The paper says its results are conditional on the supplied split because cross-partition duplicates have not been independently audited.","excerpt":"As cross-partition duplicates have not been independently audited, results are conditional on the supplied split.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The paper reports that the OCT accuracy ranking differed from the reported ImageNet hierarchy, where B7 ranked first.","excerpt":"The OCT accuracy ranking differed from the reported ImageNet hierarchy, where B7 ranked first.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The study evaluates the models at a fixed 224x224 resolution on the Kermany dataset; its findings do not establish how other datasets or protocols would compare.","The author states that cross-partition duplicates have not been independently audited and that results are conditional on the supplied split.","The evidence is the arXiv abstract; it does not provide further detail on the supplied split or the duplicate-audit procedure."],"mediaId":"e27db7e6e8dc0d6c0e59f8ab65805cee64f32148d35246c83577d8dffe1e88fd","correctionReason":null,"id":"3bddb12c530f1643698c71b66875651f7ef3d98992870648d1774ade81f5bcaf","publicationId":"0ebada91-5525-4670-89f4-83ed9c3d5d9c","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","sourceTitle":"Within-Family EfficientNet Scaling under Fixed-Resolution Transfer Learning for Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Retinal Disease Classification","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-04","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-05T05:03:30.298Z","createdAt":"2026-11-10T02:55:44.459Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"e27db7e6e8dc0d6c0e59f8ab65805cee64f32148d35246c83577d8dffe1e88fd","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T02:54:42.452Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T19:58:09.109Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"e27db7e6e8dc0d6c0e59f8ab65805cee64f32148d35246c83577d8dffe1e88fd","confidence":0.7,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"bb18ccc969492b11610515a06207593140dffc563320c39ba55bcd45b9631d0c","decidedAt":"2026-11-10T02:54:45.599Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"f6392f0b6af4935a074b5bfd50b282c6cbc14a864f8c1653ef18c7be5a8d7361","observationId":"497c7f117eb30aa70172a1e50798848d1c36ca72835c7491bb7ea4e1b9c2ef6a","retrievedAt":"2026-11-10T02:54:41.975Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"5044ab5d-03b7-455e-8901-1e0b0e565543"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"467a33fa-deae-4dda-8664-2f2638dfafb4"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-10T02:55:44.459Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Sherifi, Shkelqim","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Sherifi, Shkelqim","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Sherifi, Shkelqim","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"c1b534e0b5483eee7a011e647b3bd00d3b4250dc529a0e47a15ffc3b2e3341f1:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T19:58:09.109Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"c1b534e0b5483eee7a011e647b3bd00d3b4250dc529a0e47a15ffc3b2e3341f1","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","contentSha256":"75212e006aa08fee6e41e2d41458f92bb470ae509433815d798c406145481c94","textHash":"f6392f0b6af4935a074b5bfd50b282c6cbc14a864f8c1653ef18c7be5a8d7361","observedAt":"2026-11-10T19:58:09.109Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":1,"returned":1,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","snapshotId":"c1b534e0b5483eee7a011e647b3bd00d3b4250dc529a0e47a15ffc3b2e3341f1","contentSha256":"75212e006aa08fee6e41e2d41458f92bb470ae509433815d798c406145481c94","textHash":"f6392f0b6af4935a074b5bfd50b282c6cbc14a864f8c1653ef18c7be5a8d7361","observedAt":"2026-11-10T19:58:09.109Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":38,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/3bddb12c530f1643698c71b66875651f7ef3d98992870648d1774ade81f5bcaf/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-efficientnet-scaling-for-retinal-disease-3bddb12c","formats":{"html":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-efficientnet-scaling-for-retinal-disease-3bddb12c","markdown":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-efficientnet-scaling-for-retinal-disease-3bddb12c.md","json":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-efficientnet-scaling-for-retinal-disease-3bddb12c.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[{"id":"term-pre-training","name":"Pre-training","explanation":"A model's initial training on a large dataset, before further adaptation for particular uses.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#pre-training"},{"id":"term-cpu","name":"CPU","explanation":"The central processing unit: a general-purpose processor that carries out a computer's instructions.","referenceUrl":"https://aws.amazon.com/what-is/cpu/"},{"id":"term-latency","name":"Latency","explanation":"The delay between sending a request and receiving the result.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#latency"}],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"3bddb12c530f1643698c71b66875651f7ef3d98992870648d1774ade81f5bcaf","revision":"0ebada91-5525-4670-89f4-83ed9c3d5d9c","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"arXiv cs.AI: EfficientNet scaling for retinal disease classification","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-efficientnet-scaling-for-retinal-disease-3bddb12c"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","revision":"f6392f0b6af4935a074b5bfd50b282c6cbc14a864f8c1653ef18c7be5a8d7361","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Within-Family EfficientNet Scaling under Fixed-Resolution Transfer Learning for Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Retinal Disease Classification","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"3bddb12c530f1643698c71b66875651f7ef3d98992870648d1774ade81f5bcaf","title":"arXiv cs.AI: EfficientNet scaling for retinal disease classification","argument":"Author Shkelqim Sherifi asks whether EfficientNet’s natural-image scaling hierarchy carries over to retinal disease classification from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). The study compares eight ImageNet-pretrained EfficientNet variants on the Kermany dataset, all evaluated at 224x224. Sherifi reports that test accuracy did not rise consistently with model size: B1 achieved the highest accuracy and Drusen F1, while B7 showed a secondary accuracy recovery at greater model size and CPU latency. Drusen had the lowest F1 across the variants, and the accuracy-to-parameter ratio fell as model size increased. The paper says the OCT accuracy ranking differed from the reported ImageNet hierarchy, where B7 ranked first. Its findings make the paper’s point specific: scaling behavior in this transfer-learning setup depended on the task and protocol, rather than consistently favoring the largest model. The paper cautions that results are conditional on the supplied split because cross-partition duplicates have not been independently audited.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The study evaluates the models at a fixed 224x224 resolution on the Kermany dataset; its findings do not establish how other datasets or protocols would compare. The author states that cross-partition duplicates have not been independently audited and that results are conditional on the supplied split. The evidence is the arXiv abstract; it does not provide further detail on the supplied split or the duplicate-audit procedure.","speaker":{"name":"Sherifi, Shkelqim","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Within-Family EfficientNet Scaling under Fixed-Resolution Transfer Learning for Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Retinal Disease Classification","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","publishedAt":"2026-11-04","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The study compared eight ImageNet-pretrained EfficientNet variants on the Kermany dataset at 224x224 for four-class SD-OCT classification.","excerpt":"Eight ImageNet-pretrained variants (4.05-64.10M instantiated backbone parameters) were evaluated at 224x224 on the Kermany dataset.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The author reports that test accuracy varied non-monotonically, with B1 highest and B7 achieving a secondary recovery at greater model size and CPU latency.","excerpt":"Test accuracy varied non-monotonically from 95.93% (B0) to 96.95% (B1); B7 achieved 96.73%.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The author reports that Drusen had the lowest F1 across variants, while B1 had the highest Drusen F1.","excerpt":"B1 had the highest accuracy and Drusen F1 (0.8780), while B7 had Drusen F1 of 0.8720 and the highest Drusen recall (0.9177). Drusen had the lowest F1 across all variants","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The paper says its results are conditional on the supplied split because cross-partition duplicates have not been independently audited.","excerpt":"As cross-partition duplicates have not been independently audited, results are conditional on the supplied split.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The paper reports that the OCT accuracy ranking differed from the reported ImageNet hierarchy, where B7 ranked first.","excerpt":"The OCT accuracy ranking differed from the reported ImageNet hierarchy, where B7 ranked first.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T19:58:09.109Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How would an independent audit of cross-partition duplicates affect the reported results?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: EfficientNet scaling for retinal disease classification","summary":"Author Shkelqim Sherifi asks whether EfficientNet’s natural-image scaling hierarchy carries over to retinal disease classification from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). The study compares eight ImageNet-pretrained EfficientNet variants on the Kermany dataset, all evaluated at 224x224. Sherifi reports that test accuracy did not rise consistently with model size: B1 achieved the highest accuracy and Drusen F1, while B7 showed a secondary accuracy recovery at greater model size and CPU latency. Drusen had the lowest F1 across the variants, and the accuracy-to-parameter ratio fell as model size increased. The paper says the OCT accuracy ranking differed from the reported ImageNet hierarchy, where B7 ranked first. Its findings make the paper’s point specific: scaling behavior in this transfer-learning setup depended on the task and protocol, rather than consistently favoring the largest model. The paper cautions that results are conditional on the supplied split because cross-partition duplicates have not been independently audited.","question":"How would an independent audit of cross-partition duplicates affect the reported results?","claims":[{"text":"The study compared eight ImageNet-pretrained EfficientNet variants on the Kermany dataset at 224x224 for four-class SD-OCT classification.","excerpt":"Eight ImageNet-pretrained variants (4.05-64.10M instantiated backbone parameters) were evaluated at 224x224 on the Kermany dataset.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The author reports that test accuracy varied non-monotonically, with B1 highest and B7 achieving a secondary recovery at greater model size and CPU latency.","excerpt":"Test accuracy varied non-monotonically from 95.93% (B0) to 96.95% (B1); B7 achieved 96.73%.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The author reports that Drusen had the lowest F1 across variants, while B1 had the highest Drusen F1.","excerpt":"B1 had the highest accuracy and Drusen F1 (0.8780), while B7 had Drusen F1 of 0.8720 and the highest Drusen recall (0.9177). Drusen had the lowest F1 across all variants","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The paper says its results are conditional on the supplied split because cross-partition duplicates have not been independently audited.","excerpt":"As cross-partition duplicates have not been independently audited, results are conditional on the supplied split.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The paper reports that the OCT accuracy ranking differed from the reported ImageNet hierarchy, where B7 ranked first.","excerpt":"The OCT accuracy ranking differed from the reported ImageNet hierarchy, where B7 ranked first.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The study evaluates the models at a fixed 224x224 resolution on the Kermany dataset; its findings do not establish how other datasets or protocols would compare.","The author states that cross-partition duplicates have not been independently audited and that results are conditional on the supplied split.","The evidence is the arXiv abstract; it does not provide further detail on the supplied split or the duplicate-audit procedure."],"mediaId":"e27db7e6e8dc0d6c0e59f8ab65805cee64f32148d35246c83577d8dffe1e88fd","correctionReason":null,"id":"3bddb12c530f1643698c71b66875651f7ef3d98992870648d1774ade81f5bcaf","publicationId":"0ebada91-5525-4670-89f4-83ed9c3d5d9c","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","sourceTitle":"Within-Family EfficientNet Scaling under Fixed-Resolution Transfer Learning for Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Retinal Disease Classification","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-04","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-05T05:03:30.298Z","createdAt":"2026-11-10T02:55:44.459Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"e27db7e6e8dc0d6c0e59f8ab65805cee64f32148d35246c83577d8dffe1e88fd","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T02:54:42.452Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T19:58:09.109Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"e27db7e6e8dc0d6c0e59f8ab65805cee64f32148d35246c83577d8dffe1e88fd","confidence":0.7,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"bb18ccc969492b11610515a06207593140dffc563320c39ba55bcd45b9631d0c","decidedAt":"2026-11-10T02:54:45.599Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"f6392f0b6af4935a074b5bfd50b282c6cbc14a864f8c1653ef18c7be5a8d7361","observationId":"497c7f117eb30aa70172a1e50798848d1c36ca72835c7491bb7ea4e1b9c2ef6a","retrievedAt":"2026-11-10T02:54:41.975Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"5044ab5d-03b7-455e-8901-1e0b0e565543"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"467a33fa-deae-4dda-8664-2f2638dfafb4"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-10T02:55:44.459Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Sherifi, Shkelqim","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Sherifi, Shkelqim","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Sherifi, Shkelqim","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"c1b534e0b5483eee7a011e647b3bd00d3b4250dc529a0e47a15ffc3b2e3341f1:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T19:58:09.109Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"c1b534e0b5483eee7a011e647b3bd00d3b4250dc529a0e47a15ffc3b2e3341f1","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","contentSha256":"75212e006aa08fee6e41e2d41458f92bb470ae509433815d798c406145481c94","textHash":"f6392f0b6af4935a074b5bfd50b282c6cbc14a864f8c1653ef18c7be5a8d7361","observedAt":"2026-11-10T19:58:09.109Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":1,"returned":1,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06452","snapshotId":"c1b534e0b5483eee7a011e647b3bd00d3b4250dc529a0e47a15ffc3b2e3341f1","contentSha256":"75212e006aa08fee6e41e2d41458f92bb470ae509433815d798c406145481c94","textHash":"f6392f0b6af4935a074b5bfd50b282c6cbc14a864f8c1653ef18c7be5a8d7361","observedAt":"2026-11-10T19:58:09.109Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":38,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/3bddb12c530f1643698c71b66875651f7ef3d98992870648d1774ade81f5bcaf/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"0ebada91-5525-4670-89f4-83ed9c3d5d9c","verdict":"uncertain","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The reading correctly credits sole author Shkelqim Sherifi and the arXiv preprint. Findings stay attributed with phrases such as 'Sherifi reports' and 'The paper says', and the duplicate caveat is framed as the author's own.","excerpt":"Authors:Shkelqim Sherifi"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"uncertain","explanation":"The summary is faithful, but several central terms go unexplained for a general reader: Drusen (a retinal deposit class), F1, CPU latency, and 'cross-partition duplicates' (the same images possibly appearing in both training and test sets). The last term drives the caveat and the question. The size of the effect is also missing: accuracy spans only about one point (95.93% to 96.95%). Smallest repair: briefly gloss Drusen and cross-partition duplicates, or add tooltips for them, and state the narrow accuracy range. Otherwise, the summary keeps the non-monotonic finding, the ImageNet contrast and the conditional caveat.","excerpt":"Test accuracy varied non-monotonically from 95.93% (B0) to 96.95% (B1); B7 achieved 96.73%."},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The originalPublished date of 2026-11-04 matches the v1 submission date. The feed date of 2026-11-05 is correctly not used.","excerpt":"[Submitted on 4 Nov 2026]"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"Every claim and excerpt appears verbatim in the abstract. The statement 'depended on the task and protocol' closely tracks the source's 'indicating task and protocol dependent scaling effects'. The limitations and the question about a duplicate audit follow directly from the source's own caveat. No benefits or impacts are invented.","excerpt":"Larger EfficientNet variants did not consistently improve SD-OCT classification."},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper. It is the most direct access to the source.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-10T02:55:44.459Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}