{"id":"b9992b53c37e5c0ae4c2cca3fefa03f22f267786c20d022daf2a2baa9771a726","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Evolutionary System Prompt Learning for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs","argument":"Authors Lunjun Zhang, Ryan Chen, and Bradly C. Stadie propose Evolutionary System Prompt Learning (E-SPL), which updates a model’s weights through reinforcement learning (RL) while evolving its system prompts through self-reflection. They describe the prompts as a place for interpretable declarative knowledge, alongside procedural knowledge in the weights. Their method samples trajectories under multiple system prompts in parallel, then uses those trajectories for both updates. The authors argue that these two kinds of updates work together: in their reported easy-to-hard generalization setting, E-SPL raises RL success on BeyondAIME from 38.8% to 45.1%. They also report gains on AIME 2025, HMMT 2025, and agentic search, and say E-SPL outperforms RL-only and evolution-only baselines across their settings. The results make the paper’s central idea concrete: self-improvement need not choose between changing a model’s weights and changing its instructions; the authors report gains from doing both. The supplied abstract gives benchmark results but does not explain the experimental methods in detail.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The supplied arXiv page provides abstract-level descriptions and results, not the experimental methods or further detail needed to assess how the reported comparisons were conducted. The reported results concern the settings named in the abstract; they do not establish performance on other tasks.","speaker":{"name":"Zhang, Lunjun, Chen, Ryan, Stadie, Bradly C.","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Evolutionary System Prompt Learning for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","publishedAt":"2026-02-16","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors propose E-SPL, which jointly updates model weights with RL and evolves system prompts through self-reflection.","excerpt":"jointly update the weights with RL and evolve the system prompts with self-reflection.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that E-SPL raises RL success on BeyondAIME from 38.8% to 45.1% in an easy-to-hard generalization setting.","excerpt":"in an easy-to-hard generalization setting (AIME $\\rightarrow$ BeyondAIME), E-SPL improves RL success rate from 38.8% $\\rightarrow$ 45.1%.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report gains on AIME 2025, HMMT 2025, and agentic search, and say E-SPL outperforms RL-only and evolution-only baselines across all settings.","excerpt":"Across all settings, E-SPL outperforms both RL-only and evolution-only baselines","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors describe a division between procedural knowledge in weights and interpretable declarative knowledge in system prompts.","excerpt":"a natural division between procedural knowledge in weights and interpretable declarative knowledge in system prompts.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T12:52:06.670Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How does E-SPL perform on tasks beyond the benchmarks and agentic-search setting reported in the abstract?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: Evolutionary System Prompt Learning for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs","summary":"Authors Lunjun Zhang, Ryan Chen, and Bradly C. Stadie propose Evolutionary System Prompt Learning (E-SPL), which updates a model’s weights through reinforcement learning (RL) while evolving its system prompts through self-reflection. They describe the prompts as a place for interpretable declarative knowledge, alongside procedural knowledge in the weights. Their method samples trajectories under multiple system prompts in parallel, then uses those trajectories for both updates. The authors argue that these two kinds of updates work together: in their reported easy-to-hard generalization setting, E-SPL raises RL success on BeyondAIME from 38.8% to 45.1%. They also report gains on AIME 2025, HMMT 2025, and agentic search, and say E-SPL outperforms RL-only and evolution-only baselines across their settings. The results make the paper’s central idea concrete: self-improvement need not choose between changing a model’s weights and changing its instructions; the authors report gains from doing both. The supplied abstract gives benchmark results but does not explain the experimental methods in detail.","question":"How does E-SPL perform on tasks beyond the benchmarks and agentic-search setting reported in the abstract?","claims":[{"text":"The authors propose E-SPL, which jointly updates model weights with RL and evolves system prompts through self-reflection.","excerpt":"jointly update the weights with RL and evolve the system prompts with self-reflection.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that E-SPL raises RL success on BeyondAIME from 38.8% to 45.1% in an easy-to-hard generalization setting.","excerpt":"in an easy-to-hard generalization setting (AIME $\\rightarrow$ BeyondAIME), E-SPL improves RL success rate from 38.8% $\\rightarrow$ 45.1%.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report gains on AIME 2025, HMMT 2025, and agentic search, and say E-SPL outperforms RL-only and evolution-only baselines across all settings.","excerpt":"Across all settings, E-SPL outperforms both RL-only and evolution-only baselines","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors describe a division between procedural knowledge in weights and interpretable declarative knowledge in system prompts.","excerpt":"a natural division between procedural knowledge in weights and interpretable declarative knowledge in system prompts.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The supplied arXiv page provides abstract-level descriptions and results, not the experimental methods or further detail needed to assess how the reported comparisons were conducted.","The reported results concern the settings named in the abstract; they do not establish performance on other tasks."],"mediaId":"f7bac127bf8a109df27e225d0cab828865fc0ebd93896914f77516289d9c5297","correctionReason":null,"id":"b9992b53c37e5c0ae4c2cca3fefa03f22f267786c20d022daf2a2baa9771a726","publicationId":"990b28a4-0ef7-4d15-8ac6-0eabc80e1032","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","sourceTitle":"Evolutionary System Prompt Learning for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-02-16","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-05T05:06:33.996Z","createdAt":"2026-11-09T11:48:12.682Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"f7bac127bf8a109df27e225d0cab828865fc0ebd93896914f77516289d9c5297","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T11:47:23.386Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T12:52:06.670Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"f7bac127bf8a109df27e225d0cab828865fc0ebd93896914f77516289d9c5297","confidence":0.9,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"d614515fb630d90ac903fb55f5c5878b6f38ff14b091bfe70e681ca1548ddf00","decidedAt":"2026-11-09T11:47:24.825Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"a2dd9f7e27e70df9621083170b84887985641fc1e5b634a5c6f5df16c962def2","observationId":"a674a6b729581f4f37ca5dc4a3deb2d45bffb223db34889b6eb8e7b9192c939a","retrievedAt":"2026-11-09T11:47:23.191Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"abe4acbc-f824-4021-819f-b7fd03ab0977"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"bbdcc9de-c3fd-42d0-841b-b8adf29514fe"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-09T11:48:12.682Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Zhang, Lunjun","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Chen, Ryan","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Stadie, Bradly C.","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Zhang, Lunjun","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Zhang, Lunjun","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"fa7b74cbc92df2cf233213d0f7d05278a10a8ce8b27d2a7918ef3ce75794c2bd:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T12:52:06.670Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"fa7b74cbc92df2cf233213d0f7d05278a10a8ce8b27d2a7918ef3ce75794c2bd","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","contentSha256":"280f2964d28c1f5f9f088e8cbe4a3302544e990de0592db2140e8e1456a78566","textHash":"a2dd9f7e27e70df9621083170b84887985641fc1e5b634a5c6f5df16c962def2","observedAt":"2026-11-09T12:52:06.670Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Chen, Ryan","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Chen, Ryan","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"fa7b74cbc92df2cf233213d0f7d05278a10a8ce8b27d2a7918ef3ce75794c2bd:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T12:52:06.670Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"fa7b74cbc92df2cf233213d0f7d05278a10a8ce8b27d2a7918ef3ce75794c2bd","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","contentSha256":"280f2964d28c1f5f9f088e8cbe4a3302544e990de0592db2140e8e1456a78566","textHash":"a2dd9f7e27e70df9621083170b84887985641fc1e5b634a5c6f5df16c962def2","observedAt":"2026-11-09T12:52:06.670Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Stadie, Bradly C.","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Stadie, Bradly C.","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"fa7b74cbc92df2cf233213d0f7d05278a10a8ce8b27d2a7918ef3ce75794c2bd:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T12:52:06.670Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"fa7b74cbc92df2cf233213d0f7d05278a10a8ce8b27d2a7918ef3ce75794c2bd","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","contentSha256":"280f2964d28c1f5f9f088e8cbe4a3302544e990de0592db2140e8e1456a78566","textHash":"a2dd9f7e27e70df9621083170b84887985641fc1e5b634a5c6f5df16c962def2","observedAt":"2026-11-09T12:52:06.670Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":3,"returned":3,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","snapshotId":"fa7b74cbc92df2cf233213d0f7d05278a10a8ce8b27d2a7918ef3ce75794c2bd","contentSha256":"280f2964d28c1f5f9f088e8cbe4a3302544e990de0592db2140e8e1456a78566","textHash":"a2dd9f7e27e70df9621083170b84887985641fc1e5b634a5c6f5df16c962def2","observedAt":"2026-11-09T12:52:06.670Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":47,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/b9992b53c37e5c0ae4c2cca3fefa03f22f267786c20d022daf2a2baa9771a726/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-evolutionary-system-prompt-learning-for-b9992b53","formats":{"html":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-evolutionary-system-prompt-learning-for-b9992b53","markdown":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-evolutionary-system-prompt-learning-for-b9992b53.md","json":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-evolutionary-system-prompt-learning-for-b9992b53.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[{"id":"term-reinforcement-learning","name":"Reinforcement learning","explanation":"Training by trial and error, in which a system is rewarded for the outcomes its designers want.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#reinforcement-learning-rl"},{"id":"term-llm","name":"Large language model","explanation":"A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#large-language-model"},{"id":"term-agentic","name":"Agentic AI","explanation":"AI systems that plan and carry out a series of steps toward a goal, often by using other software, rather than giving one answer.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#agentic"},{"id":"term-benchmark","name":"Benchmark","explanation":"A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.","referenceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09110"}],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"b9992b53c37e5c0ae4c2cca3fefa03f22f267786c20d022daf2a2baa9771a726","revision":"990b28a4-0ef7-4d15-8ac6-0eabc80e1032","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Evolutionary System Prompt Learning for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-evolutionary-system-prompt-learning-for-b9992b53"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","revision":"a2dd9f7e27e70df9621083170b84887985641fc1e5b634a5c6f5df16c962def2","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Evolutionary System Prompt Learning for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"b9992b53c37e5c0ae4c2cca3fefa03f22f267786c20d022daf2a2baa9771a726","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Evolutionary System Prompt Learning for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs","argument":"Authors Lunjun Zhang, Ryan Chen, and Bradly C. Stadie propose Evolutionary System Prompt Learning (E-SPL), which updates a model’s weights through reinforcement learning (RL) while evolving its system prompts through self-reflection. They describe the prompts as a place for interpretable declarative knowledge, alongside procedural knowledge in the weights. Their method samples trajectories under multiple system prompts in parallel, then uses those trajectories for both updates. The authors argue that these two kinds of updates work together: in their reported easy-to-hard generalization setting, E-SPL raises RL success on BeyondAIME from 38.8% to 45.1%. They also report gains on AIME 2025, HMMT 2025, and agentic search, and say E-SPL outperforms RL-only and evolution-only baselines across their settings. The results make the paper’s central idea concrete: self-improvement need not choose between changing a model’s weights and changing its instructions; the authors report gains from doing both. The supplied abstract gives benchmark results but does not explain the experimental methods in detail.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The supplied arXiv page provides abstract-level descriptions and results, not the experimental methods or further detail needed to assess how the reported comparisons were conducted. The reported results concern the settings named in the abstract; they do not establish performance on other tasks.","speaker":{"name":"Zhang, Lunjun, Chen, Ryan, Stadie, Bradly C.","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Evolutionary System Prompt Learning for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","publishedAt":"2026-02-16","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors propose E-SPL, which jointly updates model weights with RL and evolves system prompts through self-reflection.","excerpt":"jointly update the weights with RL and evolve the system prompts with self-reflection.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that E-SPL raises RL success on BeyondAIME from 38.8% to 45.1% in an easy-to-hard generalization setting.","excerpt":"in an easy-to-hard generalization setting (AIME $\\rightarrow$ BeyondAIME), E-SPL improves RL success rate from 38.8% $\\rightarrow$ 45.1%.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report gains on AIME 2025, HMMT 2025, and agentic search, and say E-SPL outperforms RL-only and evolution-only baselines across all settings.","excerpt":"Across all settings, E-SPL outperforms both RL-only and evolution-only baselines","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors describe a division between procedural knowledge in weights and interpretable declarative knowledge in system prompts.","excerpt":"a natural division between procedural knowledge in weights and interpretable declarative knowledge in system prompts.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T12:52:06.670Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How does E-SPL perform on tasks beyond the benchmarks and agentic-search setting reported in the abstract?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: Evolutionary System Prompt Learning for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs","summary":"Authors Lunjun Zhang, Ryan Chen, and Bradly C. Stadie propose Evolutionary System Prompt Learning (E-SPL), which updates a model’s weights through reinforcement learning (RL) while evolving its system prompts through self-reflection. They describe the prompts as a place for interpretable declarative knowledge, alongside procedural knowledge in the weights. Their method samples trajectories under multiple system prompts in parallel, then uses those trajectories for both updates. The authors argue that these two kinds of updates work together: in their reported easy-to-hard generalization setting, E-SPL raises RL success on BeyondAIME from 38.8% to 45.1%. They also report gains on AIME 2025, HMMT 2025, and agentic search, and say E-SPL outperforms RL-only and evolution-only baselines across their settings. The results make the paper’s central idea concrete: self-improvement need not choose between changing a model’s weights and changing its instructions; the authors report gains from doing both. The supplied abstract gives benchmark results but does not explain the experimental methods in detail.","question":"How does E-SPL perform on tasks beyond the benchmarks and agentic-search setting reported in the abstract?","claims":[{"text":"The authors propose E-SPL, which jointly updates model weights with RL and evolves system prompts through self-reflection.","excerpt":"jointly update the weights with RL and evolve the system prompts with self-reflection.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that E-SPL raises RL success on BeyondAIME from 38.8% to 45.1% in an easy-to-hard generalization setting.","excerpt":"in an easy-to-hard generalization setting (AIME $\\rightarrow$ BeyondAIME), E-SPL improves RL success rate from 38.8% $\\rightarrow$ 45.1%.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report gains on AIME 2025, HMMT 2025, and agentic search, and say E-SPL outperforms RL-only and evolution-only baselines across all settings.","excerpt":"Across all settings, E-SPL outperforms both RL-only and evolution-only baselines","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors describe a division between procedural knowledge in weights and interpretable declarative knowledge in system prompts.","excerpt":"a natural division between procedural knowledge in weights and interpretable declarative knowledge in system prompts.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The supplied arXiv page provides abstract-level descriptions and results, not the experimental methods or further detail needed to assess how the reported comparisons were conducted.","The reported results concern the settings named in the abstract; they do not establish performance on other tasks."],"mediaId":"f7bac127bf8a109df27e225d0cab828865fc0ebd93896914f77516289d9c5297","correctionReason":null,"id":"b9992b53c37e5c0ae4c2cca3fefa03f22f267786c20d022daf2a2baa9771a726","publicationId":"990b28a4-0ef7-4d15-8ac6-0eabc80e1032","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","sourceTitle":"Evolutionary System Prompt Learning for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-02-16","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-05T05:06:33.996Z","createdAt":"2026-11-09T11:48:12.682Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"f7bac127bf8a109df27e225d0cab828865fc0ebd93896914f77516289d9c5297","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T11:47:23.386Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T12:52:06.670Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"f7bac127bf8a109df27e225d0cab828865fc0ebd93896914f77516289d9c5297","confidence":0.9,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"d614515fb630d90ac903fb55f5c5878b6f38ff14b091bfe70e681ca1548ddf00","decidedAt":"2026-11-09T11:47:24.825Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"a2dd9f7e27e70df9621083170b84887985641fc1e5b634a5c6f5df16c962def2","observationId":"a674a6b729581f4f37ca5dc4a3deb2d45bffb223db34889b6eb8e7b9192c939a","retrievedAt":"2026-11-09T11:47:23.191Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"abe4acbc-f824-4021-819f-b7fd03ab0977"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"bbdcc9de-c3fd-42d0-841b-b8adf29514fe"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-09T11:48:12.682Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Zhang, Lunjun","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Chen, Ryan","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Stadie, Bradly C.","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Zhang, Lunjun","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Zhang, Lunjun","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"fa7b74cbc92df2cf233213d0f7d05278a10a8ce8b27d2a7918ef3ce75794c2bd:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T12:52:06.670Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"fa7b74cbc92df2cf233213d0f7d05278a10a8ce8b27d2a7918ef3ce75794c2bd","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","contentSha256":"280f2964d28c1f5f9f088e8cbe4a3302544e990de0592db2140e8e1456a78566","textHash":"a2dd9f7e27e70df9621083170b84887985641fc1e5b634a5c6f5df16c962def2","observedAt":"2026-11-09T12:52:06.670Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Chen, Ryan","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Chen, Ryan","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"fa7b74cbc92df2cf233213d0f7d05278a10a8ce8b27d2a7918ef3ce75794c2bd:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T12:52:06.670Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"fa7b74cbc92df2cf233213d0f7d05278a10a8ce8b27d2a7918ef3ce75794c2bd","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","contentSha256":"280f2964d28c1f5f9f088e8cbe4a3302544e990de0592db2140e8e1456a78566","textHash":"a2dd9f7e27e70df9621083170b84887985641fc1e5b634a5c6f5df16c962def2","observedAt":"2026-11-09T12:52:06.670Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Stadie, Bradly C.","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Stadie, Bradly C.","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"fa7b74cbc92df2cf233213d0f7d05278a10a8ce8b27d2a7918ef3ce75794c2bd:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T12:52:06.670Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"fa7b74cbc92df2cf233213d0f7d05278a10a8ce8b27d2a7918ef3ce75794c2bd","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","contentSha256":"280f2964d28c1f5f9f088e8cbe4a3302544e990de0592db2140e8e1456a78566","textHash":"a2dd9f7e27e70df9621083170b84887985641fc1e5b634a5c6f5df16c962def2","observedAt":"2026-11-09T12:52:06.670Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":3,"returned":3,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14697","snapshotId":"fa7b74cbc92df2cf233213d0f7d05278a10a8ce8b27d2a7918ef3ce75794c2bd","contentSha256":"280f2964d28c1f5f9f088e8cbe4a3302544e990de0592db2140e8e1456a78566","textHash":"a2dd9f7e27e70df9621083170b84887985641fc1e5b634a5c6f5df16c962def2","observedAt":"2026-11-09T12:52:06.670Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":47,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/b9992b53c37e5c0ae4c2cca3fefa03f22f267786c20d022daf2a2baa9771a726/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"990b28a4-0ef7-4d15-8ac6-0eabc80e1032","verdict":"uncertain","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The method, results, and synergy claim are attributed to authors Lunjun Zhang, Ryan Chen and Bradly C. Stadie, matching the arXiv page. Reported numbers are framed as the authors' reports, not established facts.","excerpt":"Authors:Lunjun Zhang, Ryan Chen, Bradly C. Stadie"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"uncertain","explanation":"The summary is faithful, but central jargon may block a non-specialist: weights, system prompts, trajectories, self-reflection, and the benchmarks AIME 2025, BeyondAIME, HMMT 2025 and agentic search are never explained in plain language. Readers are not told these are math-competition and search-task benchmarks, or that weights are the model's learned parameters while a system prompt is its standing written instructions. 'Work together' also softens the authors' 'deeply synergistic.' Smallest repair: confirm term-library tooltips exist for these terms, or add brief glosses. Keep the authors' wording 'deeply synergistic.'","excerpt":"demonstrating that weight updates and context updates are deeply synergistic and can together yield gains in generalization that neither achieves alone"},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"originalPublished is 2026-02-16, matching the v1 submission date. It is not the 4 Nov 2026 v4 revision or the November feed date.","excerpt":"[Submitted on 16 Feb 2026 (v1), last revised 4 Nov 2026 (this version, v4)]"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"All four claims are supported by the abstract excerpts. The figures 38.8% to 45.1%, and the gains on AIME 2025, HMMT 2025 and agentic search, match the abstract. The baselines claim also matches. The limitations correctly note that the evidence is abstract-level only. The question is a genuine open issue rather than a leading claim. No benefits or costs are invented.","excerpt":"Across all settings, E-SPL outperforms both RL-only and evolution-only baselines"},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media ID is the verified direct link to the arXiv abstract page. That is the original source and the most direct access point.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-09T11:48:12.682Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}