{"id":"20e38cd889e67ae849b25ef4fe918ca31c8026f96d336854b3d37e05a0ec35f8","title":"arXiv cs.AI: KEEPER: Learning Control-Sufficient Textual Memory for Long-Horizon LLM Agents","argument":"The authors present KEEPER, a comparative analysis of auxiliary objectives for recursive textual memory in long-horizon LLM agents. They define self-consistency bias as the persistence of incorrect claims already present in incoming memory. Their comparison examines supervision targets along information-content and update-sensitivity axes within a shared recursive interface. Among the evaluated conditions, reward-related prediction achieved the highest task performance both before and after offline reinforcement learning, outperforming joint supervision. The authors also describe a claim-level analysis of one baseline trajectory, where errors persisted despite corrective observations. They argue that task performance alone does not establish memory reliability: evaluation should also track error persistence and valid-information retention. The abstract does not establish how these findings extend beyond the evaluated conditions.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract, not the full paper; it does not provide details of the evaluation setup or measurements. The abstract's claim-level analysis concerns one baseline trajectory, so it does not establish how often errors persist across other trajectories or conditions. The abstract does not establish how the reported findings extend beyond the evaluated conditions.","speaker":{"name":"Choi, Jinkyeong, Jeong, Chaebin, Jeon, Junsung, Park, Donghyeon","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"KEEPER: Learning Control-Sufficient Textual Memory for Long-Horizon LLM Agents","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","publishedAt":"2026-10-30","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors define self-consistency bias as incorrect claims persisting in incoming memory.","excerpt":"We define self-consistency bias as the persistence of incorrect claims already present in the incoming memory.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Among evaluated conditions, reward-related prediction had the highest task performance before and after offline reinforcement learning, exceeding joint supervision.","excerpt":"Among evaluated conditions, reward-related prediction achieve the highest task performance before and after offline reinforcement learning, outperforming joint supervision.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"A claim-level analysis of one baseline trajectory documents error persistence despite corrective observations.","excerpt":"A claim-level analysis of one baseline trajectory documents error persistence despite corrective observations.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that assessing task outcomes alone is insufficient and motivate also evaluating error persistence and valid-information retention.","excerpt":"Together, these analyses motivate evaluating error persistence and valid-information retention alongside task outcomes.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","checkedAt":"2026-11-11T04:16:07.147Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How should error persistence and valid-information retention be evaluated alongside task outcomes?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: KEEPER: Learning Control-Sufficient Textual Memory for Long-Horizon LLM Agents","summary":"The authors present KEEPER, a comparative analysis of auxiliary objectives for recursive textual memory in long-horizon LLM agents. They define self-consistency bias as the persistence of incorrect claims already present in incoming memory. Their comparison examines supervision targets along information-content and update-sensitivity axes within a shared recursive interface. Among the evaluated conditions, reward-related prediction achieved the highest task performance both before and after offline reinforcement learning, outperforming joint supervision. The authors also describe a claim-level analysis of one baseline trajectory, where errors persisted despite corrective observations. They argue that task performance alone does not establish memory reliability: evaluation should also track error persistence and valid-information retention. The abstract does not establish how these findings extend beyond the evaluated conditions.","question":"How should error persistence and valid-information retention be evaluated alongside task outcomes?","claims":[{"text":"The authors define self-consistency bias as incorrect claims persisting in incoming memory.","excerpt":"We define self-consistency bias as the persistence of incorrect claims already present in the incoming memory.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Among evaluated conditions, reward-related prediction had the highest task performance before and after offline reinforcement learning, exceeding joint supervision.","excerpt":"Among evaluated conditions, reward-related prediction achieve the highest task performance before and after offline reinforcement learning, outperforming joint supervision.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"A claim-level analysis of one baseline trajectory documents error persistence despite corrective observations.","excerpt":"A claim-level analysis of one baseline trajectory documents error persistence despite corrective observations.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that assessing task outcomes alone is insufficient and motivate also evaluating error persistence and valid-information retention.","excerpt":"Together, these analyses motivate evaluating error persistence and valid-information retention alongside task outcomes.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract, not the full paper; it does not provide details of the evaluation setup or measurements.","The abstract's claim-level analysis concerns one baseline trajectory, so it does not establish how often errors persist across other trajectories or conditions.","The abstract does not establish how the reported findings extend beyond the evaluated conditions."],"mediaId":"82ec853666f8de302baf14b0fc72f50c967e2b9ddcd0b33be636948f3694095b","correctionReason":null,"id":"20e38cd889e67ae849b25ef4fe918ca31c8026f96d336854b3d37e05a0ec35f8","publicationId":"09ae2f7b-b3e2-47d1-8694-f163411a9d5d","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","sourceTitle":"KEEPER: Learning Control-Sufficient Textual Memory for Long-Horizon LLM Agents","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-30","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-02T05:04:08.682Z","createdAt":"2026-11-11T02:09:05.893Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"82ec853666f8de302baf14b0fc72f50c967e2b9ddcd0b33be636948f3694095b","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-02T08:47:31.729Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","checkedAt":"2026-11-11T04:16:07.147Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"82ec853666f8de302baf14b0fc72f50c967e2b9ddcd0b33be636948f3694095b","confidence":0.55,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"c63ca5034462a895aaed393ef28f57b93e5cd2cdc6ae766c1bf507a08ab86104","decidedAt":"2026-11-02T08:47:32.567Z","redecided":{"from":"stream-admission-v5","under":"stream-admission-v5+confidence-0.5"}},"provenance":{"textHash":"56c16cd9a5dddb55e6b298cafae327e14cbbe5a6d9b40a4d6a6d34aff86c661c","observationId":"ac299a16443a56a8b5888b0e4e06ce7ca45620e1fceee75c7227ee8cae8d9819","retrievedAt":"2026-11-02T08:47:31.581Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"411144e7-1b52-48b5-8a3f-8371c048f5a7"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"adb4421f-dacf-45dc-81b5-f5a87143cf6c"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-11T02:09:05.893Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Choi, Jinkyeong","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Jeong, Chaebin","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Jeon, Junsung","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Park, Donghyeon","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Choi, Jinkyeong","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Choi, Jinkyeong","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"2bb716754db7b4fff5b07a56697d3b5db8ea8e2ebaaac27b2b623cc92edfdc10:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-11T04:16:07.147Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"2bb716754db7b4fff5b07a56697d3b5db8ea8e2ebaaac27b2b623cc92edfdc10","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","contentSha256":"a24df6e4442ed2e1a68e9897aa1ea2c571c11da3258d007f50d901f31ab91738","textHash":"56c16cd9a5dddb55e6b298cafae327e14cbbe5a6d9b40a4d6a6d34aff86c661c","observedAt":"2026-11-11T04:16:07.147Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Jeong, Chaebin","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Jeong, Chaebin","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"2bb716754db7b4fff5b07a56697d3b5db8ea8e2ebaaac27b2b623cc92edfdc10:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-11T04:16:07.147Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"2bb716754db7b4fff5b07a56697d3b5db8ea8e2ebaaac27b2b623cc92edfdc10","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","contentSha256":"a24df6e4442ed2e1a68e9897aa1ea2c571c11da3258d007f50d901f31ab91738","textHash":"56c16cd9a5dddb55e6b298cafae327e14cbbe5a6d9b40a4d6a6d34aff86c661c","observedAt":"2026-11-11T04:16:07.147Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Jeon, Junsung","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Jeon, Junsung","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"2bb716754db7b4fff5b07a56697d3b5db8ea8e2ebaaac27b2b623cc92edfdc10:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-11T04:16:07.147Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"2bb716754db7b4fff5b07a56697d3b5db8ea8e2ebaaac27b2b623cc92edfdc10","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","contentSha256":"a24df6e4442ed2e1a68e9897aa1ea2c571c11da3258d007f50d901f31ab91738","textHash":"56c16cd9a5dddb55e6b298cafae327e14cbbe5a6d9b40a4d6a6d34aff86c661c","observedAt":"2026-11-11T04:16:07.147Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Park, Donghyeon","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Park, Donghyeon","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"2bb716754db7b4fff5b07a56697d3b5db8ea8e2ebaaac27b2b623cc92edfdc10:participation:3","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-11T04:16:07.147Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"2bb716754db7b4fff5b07a56697d3b5db8ea8e2ebaaac27b2b623cc92edfdc10","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","contentSha256":"a24df6e4442ed2e1a68e9897aa1ea2c571c11da3258d007f50d901f31ab91738","textHash":"56c16cd9a5dddb55e6b298cafae327e14cbbe5a6d9b40a4d6a6d34aff86c661c","observedAt":"2026-11-11T04:16:07.147Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":4,"returned":4,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","snapshotId":"2bb716754db7b4fff5b07a56697d3b5db8ea8e2ebaaac27b2b623cc92edfdc10","contentSha256":"a24df6e4442ed2e1a68e9897aa1ea2c571c11da3258d007f50d901f31ab91738","textHash":"56c16cd9a5dddb55e6b298cafae327e14cbbe5a6d9b40a4d6a6d34aff86c661c","observedAt":"2026-11-11T04:16:07.147Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":43,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/20e38cd889e67ae849b25ef4fe918ca31c8026f96d336854b3d37e05a0ec35f8/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-keeper-learning-control-sufficient-textual-memory-20e38cd8","formats":{"html":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-keeper-learning-control-sufficient-textual-memory-20e38cd8","markdown":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-keeper-learning-control-sufficient-textual-memory-20e38cd8.md","json":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-keeper-learning-control-sufficient-textual-memory-20e38cd8.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[{"id":"term-llm","name":"Large language model","explanation":"A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#large-language-model"},{"id":"term-reinforcement-learning","name":"Reinforcement learning","explanation":"Training by trial and error, in which a system is rewarded for the outcomes its designers want.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#reinforcement-learning-rl"}],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"20e38cd889e67ae849b25ef4fe918ca31c8026f96d336854b3d37e05a0ec35f8","revision":"09ae2f7b-b3e2-47d1-8694-f163411a9d5d","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"arXiv cs.AI: KEEPER: Learning Control-Sufficient Textual Memory for Long-Horizon LLM Agents","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-keeper-learning-control-sufficient-textual-memory-20e38cd8"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","revision":"56c16cd9a5dddb55e6b298cafae327e14cbbe5a6d9b40a4d6a6d34aff86c661c","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"KEEPER: Learning Control-Sufficient Textual Memory for Long-Horizon LLM Agents","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"20e38cd889e67ae849b25ef4fe918ca31c8026f96d336854b3d37e05a0ec35f8","title":"arXiv cs.AI: KEEPER: Learning Control-Sufficient Textual Memory for Long-Horizon LLM Agents","argument":"The authors present KEEPER, a comparative analysis of auxiliary objectives for recursive textual memory in long-horizon LLM agents. They define self-consistency bias as the persistence of incorrect claims already present in incoming memory. Their comparison examines supervision targets along information-content and update-sensitivity axes within a shared recursive interface. Among the evaluated conditions, reward-related prediction achieved the highest task performance both before and after offline reinforcement learning, outperforming joint supervision. The authors also describe a claim-level analysis of one baseline trajectory, where errors persisted despite corrective observations. They argue that task performance alone does not establish memory reliability: evaluation should also track error persistence and valid-information retention. The abstract does not establish how these findings extend beyond the evaluated conditions.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract, not the full paper; it does not provide details of the evaluation setup or measurements. The abstract's claim-level analysis concerns one baseline trajectory, so it does not establish how often errors persist across other trajectories or conditions. The abstract does not establish how the reported findings extend beyond the evaluated conditions.","speaker":{"name":"Choi, Jinkyeong, Jeong, Chaebin, Jeon, Junsung, Park, Donghyeon","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"KEEPER: Learning Control-Sufficient Textual Memory for Long-Horizon LLM Agents","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","publishedAt":"2026-10-30","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors define self-consistency bias as incorrect claims persisting in incoming memory.","excerpt":"We define self-consistency bias as the persistence of incorrect claims already present in the incoming memory.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Among evaluated conditions, reward-related prediction had the highest task performance before and after offline reinforcement learning, exceeding joint supervision.","excerpt":"Among evaluated conditions, reward-related prediction achieve the highest task performance before and after offline reinforcement learning, outperforming joint supervision.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"A claim-level analysis of one baseline trajectory documents error persistence despite corrective observations.","excerpt":"A claim-level analysis of one baseline trajectory documents error persistence despite corrective observations.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that assessing task outcomes alone is insufficient and motivate also evaluating error persistence and valid-information retention.","excerpt":"Together, these analyses motivate evaluating error persistence and valid-information retention alongside task outcomes.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","checkedAt":"2026-11-11T04:16:07.147Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How should error persistence and valid-information retention be evaluated alongside task outcomes?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: KEEPER: Learning Control-Sufficient Textual Memory for Long-Horizon LLM Agents","summary":"The authors present KEEPER, a comparative analysis of auxiliary objectives for recursive textual memory in long-horizon LLM agents. They define self-consistency bias as the persistence of incorrect claims already present in incoming memory. Their comparison examines supervision targets along information-content and update-sensitivity axes within a shared recursive interface. Among the evaluated conditions, reward-related prediction achieved the highest task performance both before and after offline reinforcement learning, outperforming joint supervision. The authors also describe a claim-level analysis of one baseline trajectory, where errors persisted despite corrective observations. They argue that task performance alone does not establish memory reliability: evaluation should also track error persistence and valid-information retention. The abstract does not establish how these findings extend beyond the evaluated conditions.","question":"How should error persistence and valid-information retention be evaluated alongside task outcomes?","claims":[{"text":"The authors define self-consistency bias as incorrect claims persisting in incoming memory.","excerpt":"We define self-consistency bias as the persistence of incorrect claims already present in the incoming memory.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Among evaluated conditions, reward-related prediction had the highest task performance before and after offline reinforcement learning, exceeding joint supervision.","excerpt":"Among evaluated conditions, reward-related prediction achieve the highest task performance before and after offline reinforcement learning, outperforming joint supervision.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"A claim-level analysis of one baseline trajectory documents error persistence despite corrective observations.","excerpt":"A claim-level analysis of one baseline trajectory documents error persistence despite corrective observations.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that assessing task outcomes alone is insufficient and motivate also evaluating error persistence and valid-information retention.","excerpt":"Together, these analyses motivate evaluating error persistence and valid-information retention alongside task outcomes.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract, not the full paper; it does not provide details of the evaluation setup or measurements.","The abstract's claim-level analysis concerns one baseline trajectory, so it does not establish how often errors persist across other trajectories or conditions.","The abstract does not establish how the reported findings extend beyond the evaluated conditions."],"mediaId":"82ec853666f8de302baf14b0fc72f50c967e2b9ddcd0b33be636948f3694095b","correctionReason":null,"id":"20e38cd889e67ae849b25ef4fe918ca31c8026f96d336854b3d37e05a0ec35f8","publicationId":"09ae2f7b-b3e2-47d1-8694-f163411a9d5d","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","sourceTitle":"KEEPER: Learning Control-Sufficient Textual Memory for Long-Horizon LLM Agents","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-30","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-02T05:04:08.682Z","createdAt":"2026-11-11T02:09:05.893Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"82ec853666f8de302baf14b0fc72f50c967e2b9ddcd0b33be636948f3694095b","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-02T08:47:31.729Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","checkedAt":"2026-11-11T04:16:07.147Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"82ec853666f8de302baf14b0fc72f50c967e2b9ddcd0b33be636948f3694095b","confidence":0.55,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"c63ca5034462a895aaed393ef28f57b93e5cd2cdc6ae766c1bf507a08ab86104","decidedAt":"2026-11-02T08:47:32.567Z","redecided":{"from":"stream-admission-v5","under":"stream-admission-v5+confidence-0.5"}},"provenance":{"textHash":"56c16cd9a5dddb55e6b298cafae327e14cbbe5a6d9b40a4d6a6d34aff86c661c","observationId":"ac299a16443a56a8b5888b0e4e06ce7ca45620e1fceee75c7227ee8cae8d9819","retrievedAt":"2026-11-02T08:47:31.581Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"411144e7-1b52-48b5-8a3f-8371c048f5a7"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"adb4421f-dacf-45dc-81b5-f5a87143cf6c"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-11T02:09:05.893Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Choi, Jinkyeong","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Jeong, Chaebin","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Jeon, Junsung","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Park, Donghyeon","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Choi, Jinkyeong","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Choi, Jinkyeong","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"2bb716754db7b4fff5b07a56697d3b5db8ea8e2ebaaac27b2b623cc92edfdc10:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-11T04:16:07.147Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"2bb716754db7b4fff5b07a56697d3b5db8ea8e2ebaaac27b2b623cc92edfdc10","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","contentSha256":"a24df6e4442ed2e1a68e9897aa1ea2c571c11da3258d007f50d901f31ab91738","textHash":"56c16cd9a5dddb55e6b298cafae327e14cbbe5a6d9b40a4d6a6d34aff86c661c","observedAt":"2026-11-11T04:16:07.147Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Jeong, Chaebin","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Jeong, Chaebin","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"2bb716754db7b4fff5b07a56697d3b5db8ea8e2ebaaac27b2b623cc92edfdc10:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-11T04:16:07.147Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"2bb716754db7b4fff5b07a56697d3b5db8ea8e2ebaaac27b2b623cc92edfdc10","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","contentSha256":"a24df6e4442ed2e1a68e9897aa1ea2c571c11da3258d007f50d901f31ab91738","textHash":"56c16cd9a5dddb55e6b298cafae327e14cbbe5a6d9b40a4d6a6d34aff86c661c","observedAt":"2026-11-11T04:16:07.147Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Jeon, Junsung","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Jeon, Junsung","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"2bb716754db7b4fff5b07a56697d3b5db8ea8e2ebaaac27b2b623cc92edfdc10:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-11T04:16:07.147Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"2bb716754db7b4fff5b07a56697d3b5db8ea8e2ebaaac27b2b623cc92edfdc10","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","contentSha256":"a24df6e4442ed2e1a68e9897aa1ea2c571c11da3258d007f50d901f31ab91738","textHash":"56c16cd9a5dddb55e6b298cafae327e14cbbe5a6d9b40a4d6a6d34aff86c661c","observedAt":"2026-11-11T04:16:07.147Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Park, Donghyeon","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Park, Donghyeon","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"2bb716754db7b4fff5b07a56697d3b5db8ea8e2ebaaac27b2b623cc92edfdc10:participation:3","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-11T04:16:07.147Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"2bb716754db7b4fff5b07a56697d3b5db8ea8e2ebaaac27b2b623cc92edfdc10","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","contentSha256":"a24df6e4442ed2e1a68e9897aa1ea2c571c11da3258d007f50d901f31ab91738","textHash":"56c16cd9a5dddb55e6b298cafae327e14cbbe5a6d9b40a4d6a6d34aff86c661c","observedAt":"2026-11-11T04:16:07.147Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":4,"returned":4,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41482","snapshotId":"2bb716754db7b4fff5b07a56697d3b5db8ea8e2ebaaac27b2b623cc92edfdc10","contentSha256":"a24df6e4442ed2e1a68e9897aa1ea2c571c11da3258d007f50d901f31ab91738","textHash":"56c16cd9a5dddb55e6b298cafae327e14cbbe5a6d9b40a4d6a6d34aff86c661c","observedAt":"2026-11-11T04:16:07.147Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":43,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/20e38cd889e67ae849b25ef4fe918ca31c8026f96d336854b3d37e05a0ec35f8/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"09ae2f7b-b3e2-47d1-8694-f163411a9d5d","verdict":"uncertain","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The reading consistently attributes the definitions, findings and argument to the authors of the arXiv paper. The 'arXiv cs.AI' label matches the feed and the paper's cross-listing, although its primary category is cs.CL. The authors' claims are not presented as established fact.","excerpt":"Authors:Jinkyeong Choi, Chaebin Jeong, Junsung Jeon, Donghyeon Park"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"uncertain","explanation":"The reading follows the abstract and keeps its central argument, but a non-specialist could not follow it. Central technical terms are never explained in plain language: long-horizon LLM agents, recursive textual memory, auxiliary objectives, information-content and update-sensitivity axes, joint supervision, and offline reinforcement learning. Smallest repair: briefly say an agent rewrites its own text notes over many steps, so earlier mistakes can be carried forward even after it sees correcting information. Then add term-library tooltips for the remaining terms. The title restates the paper title with no plain-language hook.","excerpt":"Recursive textual memory can carry earlier errors into later updates, yet task performance alone does not establish memory reliability."},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The originalPublished value of 2026-10-30 matches the v1 submission date on arXiv. It does not reflect the later feed date of 2026-11-02.","excerpt":"[Submitted on 30 Oct 2026]"},{"dimension":"support","status":"uncertain","explanation":"Most claims match the abstract closely, and the limitations are appropriate. However, claim 1 says self-consistency bias means incorrect claims 'persisting in incoming memory.' It drops 'already present', which blurs the meaning: errors already in the incoming memory persist through the update. The summary body states this correctly. Smallest repair: restore 'already present in the incoming memory'. The question follows from the source and is not leading.","excerpt":"We define self-consistency bias as the persistence of incorrect claims already present in the incoming memory."},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified link to the original arXiv abstract page. It is the direct source, and no better media was found.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-11T02:09:05.893Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}