{"id":"3ed978794b2864467a306a7cf93e361bd64a6ed7a655e81415d6ff9b3e581bc6","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Latent Decision Flow Rewards for Clinical Guideline Reasoning","argument":"Gaurav Bhatt and Marinka Zitnik introduce GUIDER, a method for training reasoning models on clinical practice guidelines, which express recommendations as conditional decision flows. They identify two challenges: a guideline-consistent flow does not necessarily yield the right answer for a patient, and multiple valid flows may support the same decision. GUIDER jointly trains a controller to generate plausible flows and a policy to produce a flow and final answer for each patient case. It scores the policy across several controller-generated flows to account for path multiplicity, and gates that process reward on answer correctness to address the path–answer gap.\n\nThe authors report that, on MedGUIDE, GUIDER with Qwen3-14B achieves 82.5 weighted accuracy and 73.5 guideline adherence, 3.3 and 3.1 points above the strongest clinical reinforcement learning baseline. They also report improvements over CRPO, MRPO, and FaithMed on three out-of-domain benchmarks, using Qwen3-14B and Gemma4-12B backbones. As an Escape Meridian interpretation, these benchmark results do not establish whether the method improves clinical decisions or patient outcomes in practice. Does GUIDER’s reported performance translate to better decisions for patients in clinical use?","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"This reading is based on the arXiv abstract, not the full paper; details needed to assess the experiments and their scope are not present in the supplied evidence. The abstract reports benchmark results but does not establish performance or effects on patient outcomes in clinical use.","speaker":{"name":"Bhatt, Gaurav, Zitnik, Marinka","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Latent Decision Flow Rewards for Clinical Guideline Reasoning","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","publishedAt":"2026-10-28","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"Bhatt and Zitnik introduce GUIDER, which jointly optimizes a decision flow controller and a reasoning policy for clinical guideline reasoning.","excerpt":"We introduce GUIDER, a method that jointly optimizes a decision flow controller and a reasoning policy.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"GUIDER addresses multiple valid decision flows by computing the policy’s process reward over several controller-generated flows, and addresses the path–answer gap by making that reward conditional on answer correctness.","excerpt":"GUIDER computes the process reward for the policy over several controller-generated flows, which accounts for path multiplicity, and gates this reward on answer correctness, which addresses the path--answer gap.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"On MedGUIDE, the authors report that GUIDER with Qwen3-14B achieves 82.5 weighted accuracy and 73.5 guideline adherence, exceeding the strongest clinical reinforcement learning baseline by 3.3 and 3.1 points.","excerpt":"On MedGUIDE, GUIDER with Qwen3-14B achieves 82.5 weighted accuracy and 73.5 guideline adherence, 3.3 and 3.1 points above the strongest clinical reinforcement learning baseline.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report improvements over CRPO, MRPO, and FaithMed on the out-of-domain benchmarks AMEGA-LLM, RealMedQA, and CancerGUIDE, with Qwen3-14B and Gemma4-12B backbones.","excerpt":"With Qwen3-14B and Gemma4-12B backbones, GUIDER also improves over CRPO, MRPO, and FaithMed on the out-of-domain benchmarks AMEGA-LLM, RealMedQA, and CancerGUIDE.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The abstract reports benchmark performance but does not establish effects on clinical decisions or patient outcomes in practice.","excerpt":"On MedGUIDE, GUIDER with Qwen3-14B achieves 82.5 weighted accuracy and 73.5 guideline adherence","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","relationship":"Escape Meridian interpretation"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","checkedAt":"2026-11-13T05:06:06.667Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"Does GUIDER’s reported performance translate to better decisions for patients in clinical use?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: Latent Decision Flow Rewards for Clinical Guideline Reasoning","summary":"Gaurav Bhatt and Marinka Zitnik introduce GUIDER, a method for training reasoning models on clinical practice guidelines, which express recommendations as conditional decision flows. They identify two challenges: a guideline-consistent flow does not necessarily yield the right answer for a patient, and multiple valid flows may support the same decision. GUIDER jointly trains a controller to generate plausible flows and a policy to produce a flow and final answer for each patient case. It scores the policy across several controller-generated flows to account for path multiplicity, and gates that process reward on answer correctness to address the path–answer gap.\n\nThe authors report that, on MedGUIDE, GUIDER with Qwen3-14B achieves 82.5 weighted accuracy and 73.5 guideline adherence, 3.3 and 3.1 points above the strongest clinical reinforcement learning baseline. They also report improvements over CRPO, MRPO, and FaithMed on three out-of-domain benchmarks, using Qwen3-14B and Gemma4-12B backbones. As an Escape Meridian interpretation, these benchmark results do not establish whether the method improves clinical decisions or patient outcomes in practice. Does GUIDER’s reported performance translate to better decisions for patients in clinical use?","question":"Does GUIDER’s reported performance translate to better decisions for patients in clinical use?","claims":[{"text":"Bhatt and Zitnik introduce GUIDER, which jointly optimizes a decision flow controller and a reasoning policy for clinical guideline reasoning.","excerpt":"We introduce GUIDER, a method that jointly optimizes a decision flow controller and a reasoning policy.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"GUIDER addresses multiple valid decision flows by computing the policy’s process reward over several controller-generated flows, and addresses the path–answer gap by making that reward conditional on answer correctness.","excerpt":"GUIDER computes the process reward for the policy over several controller-generated flows, which accounts for path multiplicity, and gates this reward on answer correctness, which addresses the path--answer gap.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"On MedGUIDE, the authors report that GUIDER with Qwen3-14B achieves 82.5 weighted accuracy and 73.5 guideline adherence, exceeding the strongest clinical reinforcement learning baseline by 3.3 and 3.1 points.","excerpt":"On MedGUIDE, GUIDER with Qwen3-14B achieves 82.5 weighted accuracy and 73.5 guideline adherence, 3.3 and 3.1 points above the strongest clinical reinforcement learning baseline.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report improvements over CRPO, MRPO, and FaithMed on the out-of-domain benchmarks AMEGA-LLM, RealMedQA, and CancerGUIDE, with Qwen3-14B and Gemma4-12B backbones.","excerpt":"With Qwen3-14B and Gemma4-12B backbones, GUIDER also improves over CRPO, MRPO, and FaithMed on the out-of-domain benchmarks AMEGA-LLM, RealMedQA, and CancerGUIDE.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The abstract reports benchmark performance but does not establish effects on clinical decisions or patient outcomes in practice.","excerpt":"On MedGUIDE, GUIDER with Qwen3-14B achieves 82.5 weighted accuracy and 73.5 guideline adherence","support":"interpretation"}],"limitations":["This reading is based on the arXiv abstract, not the full paper; details needed to assess the experiments and their scope are not present in the supplied evidence.","The abstract reports benchmark results but does not establish performance or effects on patient outcomes in clinical use."],"mediaId":"cc04513dedf5d4c2c80c640c6cd85aca5fd5360d7717472d2f02ef1e44eec023","correctionReason":null,"id":"3ed978794b2864467a306a7cf93e361bd64a6ed7a655e81415d6ff9b3e581bc6","publicationId":"fd32472d-d461-4d88-8bc2-496786ace7fa","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","sourceTitle":"Latent Decision Flow Rewards for Clinical Guideline Reasoning","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-28","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-30T06:45:37.665Z","createdAt":"2026-11-13T04:02:54.632Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"cc04513dedf5d4c2c80c640c6cd85aca5fd5360d7717472d2f02ef1e44eec023","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-10-31T05:47:06.583Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","checkedAt":"2026-11-13T05:06:06.667Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"cc04513dedf5d4c2c80c640c6cd85aca5fd5360d7717472d2f02ef1e44eec023","confidence":0.84,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"ad9f1636207eddeeed4537b8364de932c160348428a49a16572590098d3f566e","decidedAt":"2026-10-31T05:47:07.724Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"43b02c770adaac16c897a1eacf513d552bd70c3d8b76b84514e2c4c0f79d7229","observationId":"cb649f584757e92df45d5d488abad59ccc42f49442e659ecfa9feb113c29bfe0","retrievedAt":"2026-10-31T05:47:06.416Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"c355aa8c-8869-4473-8360-48f9ae672cca"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"19ea985e-11e7-4f9a-8014-20369246ba50"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-13T04:02:54.632Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Bhatt, Gaurav","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Zitnik, Marinka","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Bhatt, Gaurav","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Bhatt, Gaurav","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"de00eccd44790a9323e07e40f0568967e75f1a3767c8a2df49d5ee2ea09ed8ad:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-13T05:06:06.667Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"de00eccd44790a9323e07e40f0568967e75f1a3767c8a2df49d5ee2ea09ed8ad","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","contentSha256":"6a7448efa90e51113d901907b8edcf2fb1ece512e9b649d193baa8f068a6602c","textHash":"43b02c770adaac16c897a1eacf513d552bd70c3d8b76b84514e2c4c0f79d7229","observedAt":"2026-11-13T05:06:06.667Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Zitnik, Marinka","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Zitnik, Marinka","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"de00eccd44790a9323e07e40f0568967e75f1a3767c8a2df49d5ee2ea09ed8ad:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-13T05:06:06.667Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"de00eccd44790a9323e07e40f0568967e75f1a3767c8a2df49d5ee2ea09ed8ad","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","contentSha256":"6a7448efa90e51113d901907b8edcf2fb1ece512e9b649d193baa8f068a6602c","textHash":"43b02c770adaac16c897a1eacf513d552bd70c3d8b76b84514e2c4c0f79d7229","observedAt":"2026-11-13T05:06:06.667Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":2,"returned":2,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","snapshotId":"de00eccd44790a9323e07e40f0568967e75f1a3767c8a2df49d5ee2ea09ed8ad","contentSha256":"6a7448efa90e51113d901907b8edcf2fb1ece512e9b649d193baa8f068a6602c","textHash":"43b02c770adaac16c897a1eacf513d552bd70c3d8b76b84514e2c4c0f79d7229","observedAt":"2026-11-13T05:06:06.667Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":42,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/3ed978794b2864467a306a7cf93e361bd64a6ed7a655e81415d6ff9b3e581bc6/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-latent-decision-flow-rewards-for-clinical-guideline-3ed97879","formats":{"html":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-latent-decision-flow-rewards-for-clinical-guideline-3ed97879","markdown":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-latent-decision-flow-rewards-for-clinical-guideline-3ed97879.md","json":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-latent-decision-flow-rewards-for-clinical-guideline-3ed97879.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[{"id":"term-reasoning-model","name":"Reasoning model","explanation":"A language model trained to work through a problem in written steps before it answers.","referenceUrl":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasoning_model"},{"id":"term-reinforcement-learning","name":"Reinforcement learning","explanation":"Training by trial and error, in which a system is rewarded for the outcomes its designers want.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#reinforcement-learning-rl"},{"id":"term-benchmark","name":"Benchmark","explanation":"A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.","referenceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09110"}],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"3ed978794b2864467a306a7cf93e361bd64a6ed7a655e81415d6ff9b3e581bc6","revision":"fd32472d-d461-4d88-8bc2-496786ace7fa","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Latent Decision Flow Rewards for Clinical Guideline Reasoning","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-latent-decision-flow-rewards-for-clinical-guideline-3ed97879"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","revision":"43b02c770adaac16c897a1eacf513d552bd70c3d8b76b84514e2c4c0f79d7229","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Latent Decision Flow Rewards for Clinical Guideline Reasoning","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"3ed978794b2864467a306a7cf93e361bd64a6ed7a655e81415d6ff9b3e581bc6","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Latent Decision Flow Rewards for Clinical Guideline Reasoning","argument":"Gaurav Bhatt and Marinka Zitnik introduce GUIDER, a method for training reasoning models on clinical practice guidelines, which express recommendations as conditional decision flows. They identify two challenges: a guideline-consistent flow does not necessarily yield the right answer for a patient, and multiple valid flows may support the same decision. GUIDER jointly trains a controller to generate plausible flows and a policy to produce a flow and final answer for each patient case. It scores the policy across several controller-generated flows to account for path multiplicity, and gates that process reward on answer correctness to address the path–answer gap.\n\nThe authors report that, on MedGUIDE, GUIDER with Qwen3-14B achieves 82.5 weighted accuracy and 73.5 guideline adherence, 3.3 and 3.1 points above the strongest clinical reinforcement learning baseline. They also report improvements over CRPO, MRPO, and FaithMed on three out-of-domain benchmarks, using Qwen3-14B and Gemma4-12B backbones. As an Escape Meridian interpretation, these benchmark results do not establish whether the method improves clinical decisions or patient outcomes in practice. Does GUIDER’s reported performance translate to better decisions for patients in clinical use?","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"This reading is based on the arXiv abstract, not the full paper; details needed to assess the experiments and their scope are not present in the supplied evidence. The abstract reports benchmark results but does not establish performance or effects on patient outcomes in clinical use.","speaker":{"name":"Bhatt, Gaurav, Zitnik, Marinka","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Latent Decision Flow Rewards for Clinical Guideline Reasoning","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","publishedAt":"2026-10-28","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"Bhatt and Zitnik introduce GUIDER, which jointly optimizes a decision flow controller and a reasoning policy for clinical guideline reasoning.","excerpt":"We introduce GUIDER, a method that jointly optimizes a decision flow controller and a reasoning policy.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"GUIDER addresses multiple valid decision flows by computing the policy’s process reward over several controller-generated flows, and addresses the path–answer gap by making that reward conditional on answer correctness.","excerpt":"GUIDER computes the process reward for the policy over several controller-generated flows, which accounts for path multiplicity, and gates this reward on answer correctness, which addresses the path--answer gap.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"On MedGUIDE, the authors report that GUIDER with Qwen3-14B achieves 82.5 weighted accuracy and 73.5 guideline adherence, exceeding the strongest clinical reinforcement learning baseline by 3.3 and 3.1 points.","excerpt":"On MedGUIDE, GUIDER with Qwen3-14B achieves 82.5 weighted accuracy and 73.5 guideline adherence, 3.3 and 3.1 points above the strongest clinical reinforcement learning baseline.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report improvements over CRPO, MRPO, and FaithMed on the out-of-domain benchmarks AMEGA-LLM, RealMedQA, and CancerGUIDE, with Qwen3-14B and Gemma4-12B backbones.","excerpt":"With Qwen3-14B and Gemma4-12B backbones, GUIDER also improves over CRPO, MRPO, and FaithMed on the out-of-domain benchmarks AMEGA-LLM, RealMedQA, and CancerGUIDE.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The abstract reports benchmark performance but does not establish effects on clinical decisions or patient outcomes in practice.","excerpt":"On MedGUIDE, GUIDER with Qwen3-14B achieves 82.5 weighted accuracy and 73.5 guideline adherence","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","relationship":"Escape Meridian interpretation"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","checkedAt":"2026-11-13T05:06:06.667Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"Does GUIDER’s reported performance translate to better decisions for patients in clinical use?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: Latent Decision Flow Rewards for Clinical Guideline Reasoning","summary":"Gaurav Bhatt and Marinka Zitnik introduce GUIDER, a method for training reasoning models on clinical practice guidelines, which express recommendations as conditional decision flows. They identify two challenges: a guideline-consistent flow does not necessarily yield the right answer for a patient, and multiple valid flows may support the same decision. GUIDER jointly trains a controller to generate plausible flows and a policy to produce a flow and final answer for each patient case. It scores the policy across several controller-generated flows to account for path multiplicity, and gates that process reward on answer correctness to address the path–answer gap.\n\nThe authors report that, on MedGUIDE, GUIDER with Qwen3-14B achieves 82.5 weighted accuracy and 73.5 guideline adherence, 3.3 and 3.1 points above the strongest clinical reinforcement learning baseline. They also report improvements over CRPO, MRPO, and FaithMed on three out-of-domain benchmarks, using Qwen3-14B and Gemma4-12B backbones. As an Escape Meridian interpretation, these benchmark results do not establish whether the method improves clinical decisions or patient outcomes in practice. Does GUIDER’s reported performance translate to better decisions for patients in clinical use?","question":"Does GUIDER’s reported performance translate to better decisions for patients in clinical use?","claims":[{"text":"Bhatt and Zitnik introduce GUIDER, which jointly optimizes a decision flow controller and a reasoning policy for clinical guideline reasoning.","excerpt":"We introduce GUIDER, a method that jointly optimizes a decision flow controller and a reasoning policy.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"GUIDER addresses multiple valid decision flows by computing the policy’s process reward over several controller-generated flows, and addresses the path–answer gap by making that reward conditional on answer correctness.","excerpt":"GUIDER computes the process reward for the policy over several controller-generated flows, which accounts for path multiplicity, and gates this reward on answer correctness, which addresses the path--answer gap.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"On MedGUIDE, the authors report that GUIDER with Qwen3-14B achieves 82.5 weighted accuracy and 73.5 guideline adherence, exceeding the strongest clinical reinforcement learning baseline by 3.3 and 3.1 points.","excerpt":"On MedGUIDE, GUIDER with Qwen3-14B achieves 82.5 weighted accuracy and 73.5 guideline adherence, 3.3 and 3.1 points above the strongest clinical reinforcement learning baseline.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report improvements over CRPO, MRPO, and FaithMed on the out-of-domain benchmarks AMEGA-LLM, RealMedQA, and CancerGUIDE, with Qwen3-14B and Gemma4-12B backbones.","excerpt":"With Qwen3-14B and Gemma4-12B backbones, GUIDER also improves over CRPO, MRPO, and FaithMed on the out-of-domain benchmarks AMEGA-LLM, RealMedQA, and CancerGUIDE.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The abstract reports benchmark performance but does not establish effects on clinical decisions or patient outcomes in practice.","excerpt":"On MedGUIDE, GUIDER with Qwen3-14B achieves 82.5 weighted accuracy and 73.5 guideline adherence","support":"interpretation"}],"limitations":["This reading is based on the arXiv abstract, not the full paper; details needed to assess the experiments and their scope are not present in the supplied evidence.","The abstract reports benchmark results but does not establish performance or effects on patient outcomes in clinical use."],"mediaId":"cc04513dedf5d4c2c80c640c6cd85aca5fd5360d7717472d2f02ef1e44eec023","correctionReason":null,"id":"3ed978794b2864467a306a7cf93e361bd64a6ed7a655e81415d6ff9b3e581bc6","publicationId":"fd32472d-d461-4d88-8bc2-496786ace7fa","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","sourceTitle":"Latent Decision Flow Rewards for Clinical Guideline Reasoning","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-28","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-30T06:45:37.665Z","createdAt":"2026-11-13T04:02:54.632Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"cc04513dedf5d4c2c80c640c6cd85aca5fd5360d7717472d2f02ef1e44eec023","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-10-31T05:47:06.583Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","checkedAt":"2026-11-13T05:06:06.667Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"cc04513dedf5d4c2c80c640c6cd85aca5fd5360d7717472d2f02ef1e44eec023","confidence":0.84,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"ad9f1636207eddeeed4537b8364de932c160348428a49a16572590098d3f566e","decidedAt":"2026-10-31T05:47:07.724Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"43b02c770adaac16c897a1eacf513d552bd70c3d8b76b84514e2c4c0f79d7229","observationId":"cb649f584757e92df45d5d488abad59ccc42f49442e659ecfa9feb113c29bfe0","retrievedAt":"2026-10-31T05:47:06.416Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"c355aa8c-8869-4473-8360-48f9ae672cca"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"19ea985e-11e7-4f9a-8014-20369246ba50"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-13T04:02:54.632Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Bhatt, Gaurav","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Zitnik, Marinka","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Bhatt, Gaurav","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Bhatt, Gaurav","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"de00eccd44790a9323e07e40f0568967e75f1a3767c8a2df49d5ee2ea09ed8ad:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-13T05:06:06.667Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"de00eccd44790a9323e07e40f0568967e75f1a3767c8a2df49d5ee2ea09ed8ad","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","contentSha256":"6a7448efa90e51113d901907b8edcf2fb1ece512e9b649d193baa8f068a6602c","textHash":"43b02c770adaac16c897a1eacf513d552bd70c3d8b76b84514e2c4c0f79d7229","observedAt":"2026-11-13T05:06:06.667Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Zitnik, Marinka","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Zitnik, Marinka","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"de00eccd44790a9323e07e40f0568967e75f1a3767c8a2df49d5ee2ea09ed8ad:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-13T05:06:06.667Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"de00eccd44790a9323e07e40f0568967e75f1a3767c8a2df49d5ee2ea09ed8ad","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","contentSha256":"6a7448efa90e51113d901907b8edcf2fb1ece512e9b649d193baa8f068a6602c","textHash":"43b02c770adaac16c897a1eacf513d552bd70c3d8b76b84514e2c4c0f79d7229","observedAt":"2026-11-13T05:06:06.667Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":2,"returned":2,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38709","snapshotId":"de00eccd44790a9323e07e40f0568967e75f1a3767c8a2df49d5ee2ea09ed8ad","contentSha256":"6a7448efa90e51113d901907b8edcf2fb1ece512e9b649d193baa8f068a6602c","textHash":"43b02c770adaac16c897a1eacf513d552bd70c3d8b76b84514e2c4c0f79d7229","observedAt":"2026-11-13T05:06:06.667Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":42,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/3ed978794b2864467a306a7cf93e361bd64a6ed7a655e81415d6ff9b3e581bc6/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"fd32472d-d461-4d88-8bc2-496786ace7fa","verdict":"uncertain","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The reading correctly attributes GUIDER to authors Gaurav Bhatt and Marinka Zitnik and frames the results as author-reported. The title prefix says 'arXiv cs.AI' while the paper's primary listing is cs.LG (cross-listed to cs.AI). This matches the feed's publisher label and does not misattribute the work.","excerpt":"Authors:Gaurav Bhatt, Marinka Zitnik"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"uncertain","explanation":"The summary is faithful but hard for non-specialists. Central terms are left unexplained: 'policy' (the model being trained), 'controller', 'process reward' (credit for the reasoning steps, not just the answer), 'gates', 'backbones', 'weighted accuracy' and 'out-of-domain'. It also drops the authors' motivating contrast with existing methods. Answer rewards check only the final decision; reference-flow process rewards and supervised fine-tuning lock training to one path per case and can reduce accuracy. Smallest repair: add one plain-language gloss or tooltip for each core term, plus one sentence on why existing approaches fall short.","excerpt":"Supervised fine-tuning on annotated flows teaches guideline-consistent reasoning but constrains the model to one trajectory per case and can reduce answer accuracy."},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"originalPublished is 2026-10-28, which matches the v1 submission date on arXiv. It is not the later feed date of 2026-10-31.","excerpt":"[Submitted on 28 Oct 2026]"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"Each factual claim matches the abstract verbatim in substance, including the method design, MedGUIDE numbers, baselines, backbones and out-of-domain benchmarks. The note that benchmarks do not establish clinical outcomes is labeled as an Escape Meridian interpretation and does not overstate. The question follows from that gap without asserting an answer.","excerpt":"GUIDER computes the process reward for the policy over several controller-generated flows, which accounts for path multiplicity, and gates this reward on answer correctness"},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper, which is the most direct access to the source.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-13T04:02:54.632Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}