# arXiv cs.AI: One Temperature to Rule Them All? [Canonical reading](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-one-temperature-to-rule-them-all-9c9d42c9) In their paper, Aviv Orly, Ori Shem-Ur and Yaron Oz examine whether language models benefit from using different sampling temperatures across attempts, rather than one tuned temperature. Temperature controls the tradeoff between reliability and diversity in generated answers; the authors study this choice in pass@K, a setting that measures whether at least one of K sampled answers succeeds. They analyze how success probabilities change with temperature across questions, models and datasets. Their abstract says harder questions are less likely to share efficient temperatures, but that this relationship grows only logarithmically with hardness. The authors derive a method for evaluating the theoretically optimal allocation of multiple temperatures. They report performance improvements, but say the gains over a single temperature tuned to the sampling budget K are usually modest. They attribute the small gains to mathematical mechanisms they call “dulling effects,” which they say make temperature choices robust across different question distributions. The paper’s practical argument is that varying temperature can help, but a single well-tuned choice may capture most of the benefit in the settings they study. The abstract does not give numerical effect sizes, or enough detail to assess which models, datasets or tasks depart from that general result. Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims. ## Original source arXiv cs.AI · Article Original source date: Nov 9, 2026 (2026-11-09). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-11T18:19:22.605Z. First observed: 2026-11-11T05:09:24.690Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-11T18:18:32.686Z. - [One Temperature to Rule Them All?](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13077) ## Limits The evidence is the paper’s abstract, which reports broad findings but gives no numerical effect sizes or specific breakdowns by model, dataset or task. The abstract does not identify which cases, if any, have gains that substantially exceed those of a tuned single temperature. ## Open question How large are the gains from multiple temperatures across the models, datasets and sampling budgets studied, and where do they exceed the gains from a tuned single temperature? ## Source-stated The authors study whether varying sampling temperature across attempts improves pass@K performance compared with a single temperature tuned to the sampling budget. > asking when temperature diversity is useful, and when a single tuned temperature suffices. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13077) ## Source-stated They report that harder questions are less likely to share efficient sampling temperatures, with the relationship growing only logarithmically with hardness. > harder questions are less likely to share efficient sampling temperatures, although this trend is only logarithmic in hardness. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13077) ## Source-stated The authors say the theoretically optimal multi-temperature scheme improves performance, but its gains over tuned single-temperature baselines are typically modest. > although such a scheme improves performance, its gains over single-temperature baselines are typically modest when temperature is tuned as a function of the sampling budget K. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13077) ## Source-stated The authors attribute the modest gains to “dulling effects,” which they say make temperature choices robust across different question distributions. > we call dulling effects, and show how they ensure the robustness of temperature choices across different question distributions. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13077) ## Source and contributor context Orly, Aviv, Shem-Ur, Ori, Oz, Yaron · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: 8d2da085-e583-4b2f-88e5-77fa3d2dd34d. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-11T18:19:22.605Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: useful\_perspective. Observation: c5543ceb79f9a785bd5a4d8b4805d979c4c725e19539a6db29d5bbca37c67d20. Source text hash: 4eda29f0c574f83065f86e84bb135eaf7a44f452baa6b709069207a2a27aec2c. ## Revision and source-check history ### Version 1 — 2026-11-11T18:19:22.605Z In their paper, Aviv Orly, Ori Shem-Ur and Yaron Oz examine whether language models benefit from using different sampling temperatures across attempts, rather than one tuned temperature. Temperature controls the tradeoff between reliability and diversity in generated answers; the authors study this choice in pass@K, a setting that measures whether at least one of K sampled answers succeeds. They analyze how success probabilities change with temperature across questions, models and datasets. Their abstract says harder questions are less likely to share efficient temperatures, but that this relationship grows only logarithmically with hardness. The authors derive a method for evaluating the theoretically optimal allocation of multiple temperatures. They report performance improvements, but say the gains over a single temperature tuned to the sampling budget K are usually modest. They attribute the small gains to mathematical mechanisms they call “dulling effects,” which they say make temperature choices robust across different question distributions. The paper’s practical argument is that varying temperature can help, but a single well-tuned choice may capture most of the benefit in the settings they study. The abstract does not give numerical effect sizes, or enough detail to assess which models, datasets or tasks depart from that general result. ## Original source arXiv cs.AI · Article Original source date: Nov 9, 2026 (2026-11-09). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-11T18:19:22.605Z. First observed: 2026-11-11T05:09:24.690Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-11T18:18:32.686Z. - [One Temperature to Rule Them All?](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13077) ## Limits The evidence is the paper’s abstract, which reports broad findings but gives no numerical effect sizes or specific breakdowns by model, dataset or task. The abstract does not identify which cases, if any, have gains that substantially exceed those of a tuned single temperature. ## Open question How large are the gains from multiple temperatures across the models, datasets and sampling budgets studied, and where do they exceed the gains from a tuned single temperature? ## Source-stated The authors study whether varying sampling temperature across attempts improves pass@K performance compared with a single temperature tuned to the sampling budget. > asking when temperature diversity is useful, and when a single tuned temperature suffices. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13077) ## Source-stated They report that harder questions are less likely to share efficient sampling temperatures, with the relationship growing only logarithmically with hardness. > harder questions are less likely to share efficient sampling temperatures, although this trend is only logarithmic in hardness. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13077) ## Source-stated The authors say the theoretically optimal multi-temperature scheme improves performance, but its gains over tuned single-temperature baselines are typically modest. > although such a scheme improves performance, its gains over single-temperature baselines are typically modest when temperature is tuned as a function of the sampling budget K. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13077) ## Source-stated The authors attribute the modest gains to “dulling effects,” which they say make temperature choices robust across different question distributions. > we call dulling effects, and show how they ensure the robustness of temperature choices across different question distributions. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13077) ## Source and contributor context Orly, Aviv, Shem-Ur, Ori, Oz, Yaron · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: 8d2da085-e583-4b2f-88e5-77fa3d2dd34d. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-11T18:19:22.605Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: useful\_perspective. Observation: c5543ceb79f9a785bd5a4d8b4805d979c4c725e19539a6db29d5bbca37c67d20. Source text hash: 4eda29f0c574f83065f86e84bb135eaf7a44f452baa6b709069207a2a27aec2c. ### passed — 2026-11-11T18:19:22.605Z — anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 Publication: 8d2da085-e583-4b2f-88e5-77fa3d2dd34d attribution — pass: The reading correctly attributes the paper to Aviv Orly, Ori Shem-Ur and Yaron Oz and keeps its findings framed as the authors' reported results rather than established facts. Using the arXiv cs.AI feed label as publisher is acceptable because the paper is cross-listed in cs.AI. > Authors:Aviv Orly (1), Ori Shem-Ur (1), Yaron Oz (1) summary — pass: The reading explains temperature and pass@K in plain language and faithfully follows the abstract's sequence: per-question temperature profiles, the hardness trend, the optimal multi-temperature evaluation method, modest gains over a budget-tuned single temperature, and dulling effects. Its stated limitations and question accurately describe what the abstract does not report. Terms such as "theoretically optimal allocation" are compact but understandable in context. > We investigate this discrepancy in the canonical pass@K setting, asking when temperature diversity is useful, and when a single tuned temperature suffices. date — pass: The originalPublished date of 2026-11-09 matches the arXiv v1 submission date. The 2026-11-11 feed date is correctly not used as the publication date. > \[Submitted on 9 Nov 2026\] support — pass: Each claim matches the abstract. "Grows only logarithmically" fairly paraphrases "only logarithmic in hardness." The practical takeaway that a single well-tuned temperature "may capture most of the benefit" is hedged and follows from the abstract's statement that multi-temperature gains are typically modest. The reading adds no unsupported stakeholders, benefits or numbers. > its gains over single-temperature baselines are typically modest when temperature is tuned as a function of the sampling budget K media — pass: The selected media item is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper, which is the most direct access to the source. ## Recorded references Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter. No public references recorded here yet. [Reference data (JSON)](/readings/9c9d42c9e4eed85324caa8670bf803d7790259e90f3e422c969a36bc3aea48f7/references.json) ## Corrections and challenges [Send a correction or an opposing source](https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/) [JSON record](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-one-temperature-to-rule-them-all-9c9d42c9.json)