{"id":"f2b1d6c0f9febed5945511c24bd57437808d788eff200601f44cba42676a26c1","title":"arXiv cs.AI: OTAP evaluates agent trajectories against valid solution graphs","argument":"Babak Barazandeh, Subhabrata Majumdar and George Michailidis propose OTAP, a way to evaluate an agent’s planning and execution by comparing its execution graph—the steps and dependencies in a run—with graphs of valid solutions. Unlike a binary success flag or exact matching, OTAP gives a normalized discrepancy score; its unbalanced marginals allow missing or hallucinated steps without forcing them to match. The authors report that, on controlled perturbations and three public benchmarks, OTAP separated valid from invalid trajectories where semantics-only metrics scored below chance. In a blinded study of 236 trajectories, it had the strongest agreement among six compared metrics. These results are encouraging, not a universal measure of agent quality: where a formal verifier exists, strict surface metrics predicted validity better. The authors place OTAP instead in open-ended domains without a verifier. They also report sensitivity to dependency extraction, and say granularity invariance remains an open problem that soft coupling only partly mitigates.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The evidence is the arXiv abstract; it does not provide the full paper’s experimental details or results. The reported benchmark and blinded-study findings are limited to the settings described in the abstract; the abstract does not establish performance across other tasks or domains. The authors report sensitivity to dependency extraction and say granularity invariance remains an open problem.","speaker":{"name":"Barazandeh, Babak, Majumdar, Subhabrata, Michailidis, George","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"OTAP: Structure-Aware Optimal Transport for Evaluating Planning and Execution in Agent Trajectories","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","publishedAt":"2026-07-19","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors define OTAP as a normalized discrepancy score comparing an agent’s execution graph with a set of valid solution graphs.","excerpt":"We reframe trajectory evaluation as a distance between the agent's execution graph and a set of valid solution graphs","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say OTAP's unbalanced marginals allow missing or hallucinated steps without forcing a match, while granularity invariance remains unresolved.","excerpt":"Its unbalanced marginals handle missing or hallucinated steps without forcing a match; granularity invariance remains an open problem","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"On controlled perturbations and three public benchmarks, the authors report that OTAP separated valid from invalid trajectories in a regime where semantics-only metrics scored below chance.","excerpt":"On controlled perturbations and three public benchmarks, OTAP separates valid from invalid trajectories in a regime where semantics-only metrics score below chance.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that strict surface metrics predicted validity better than OTAP where a formal verifier exists, and describe OTAP as suited to open-ended domains without one.","excerpt":"Where a formal verifier exists, strict surface metrics predict validity better than OTAP does, which places OTAP in open-ended domains where no verifier is available.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report sensitivity to dependency extraction in controlled edge-noise experiments.","excerpt":"while controlled edge-noise experiments reveal sensitivity to dependency extraction.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T00:42:08.364Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How does OTAP perform when trajectories differ in granularity, given that the authors say granularity invariance remains an open problem?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: OTAP evaluates agent trajectories against valid solution graphs","summary":"Babak Barazandeh, Subhabrata Majumdar and George Michailidis propose OTAP, a way to evaluate an agent’s planning and execution by comparing its execution graph—the steps and dependencies in a run—with graphs of valid solutions. Unlike a binary success flag or exact matching, OTAP gives a normalized discrepancy score; its unbalanced marginals allow missing or hallucinated steps without forcing them to match. The authors report that, on controlled perturbations and three public benchmarks, OTAP separated valid from invalid trajectories where semantics-only metrics scored below chance. In a blinded study of 236 trajectories, it had the strongest agreement among six compared metrics. These results are encouraging, not a universal measure of agent quality: where a formal verifier exists, strict surface metrics predicted validity better. The authors place OTAP instead in open-ended domains without a verifier. They also report sensitivity to dependency extraction, and say granularity invariance remains an open problem that soft coupling only partly mitigates.","question":"How does OTAP perform when trajectories differ in granularity, given that the authors say granularity invariance remains an open problem?","claims":[{"text":"The authors define OTAP as a normalized discrepancy score comparing an agent’s execution graph with a set of valid solution graphs.","excerpt":"We reframe trajectory evaluation as a distance between the agent's execution graph and a set of valid solution graphs","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say OTAP's unbalanced marginals allow missing or hallucinated steps without forcing a match, while granularity invariance remains unresolved.","excerpt":"Its unbalanced marginals handle missing or hallucinated steps without forcing a match; granularity invariance remains an open problem","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"On controlled perturbations and three public benchmarks, the authors report that OTAP separated valid from invalid trajectories in a regime where semantics-only metrics scored below chance.","excerpt":"On controlled perturbations and three public benchmarks, OTAP separates valid from invalid trajectories in a regime where semantics-only metrics score below chance.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that strict surface metrics predicted validity better than OTAP where a formal verifier exists, and describe OTAP as suited to open-ended domains without one.","excerpt":"Where a formal verifier exists, strict surface metrics predict validity better than OTAP does, which places OTAP in open-ended domains where no verifier is available.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report sensitivity to dependency extraction in controlled edge-noise experiments.","excerpt":"while controlled edge-noise experiments reveal sensitivity to dependency extraction.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The evidence is the arXiv abstract; it does not provide the full paper’s experimental details or results.","The reported benchmark and blinded-study findings are limited to the settings described in the abstract; the abstract does not establish performance across other tasks or domains.","The authors report sensitivity to dependency extraction and say granularity invariance remains an open problem."],"mediaId":"bfa0bb5cc537e671411ea13e4b791dd923ea2e6567e02072b1d1ff03d98dbbdb","correctionReason":null,"id":"f2b1d6c0f9febed5945511c24bd57437808d788eff200601f44cba42676a26c1","publicationId":"a0d92c09-36e7-44c4-804e-f897468c47a8","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","sourceTitle":"OTAP: Structure-Aware Optimal Transport for Evaluating Planning and Execution in Agent Trajectories","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-07-19","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-05T05:00:27.136Z","createdAt":"2026-11-10T00:10:28.495Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"bfa0bb5cc537e671411ea13e4b791dd923ea2e6567e02072b1d1ff03d98dbbdb","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T15:46:30.278Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T00:42:08.364Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"bfa0bb5cc537e671411ea13e4b791dd923ea2e6567e02072b1d1ff03d98dbbdb","confidence":0.79,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"fa4b93fc417bd7dc915f0f22721cff41675bc9b3a891f709ab2d0f7feebacd5c","decidedAt":"2026-11-09T15:46:31.384Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"4f3c4d686bf5a23f3c4b0e55227a6bd6d2ec4144e3459d2abfe66835151b5986","observationId":"14dd983a4b4116ed4aca90a8c96c75036e31e8852bf0c6487adc86227a18a117","retrievedAt":"2026-11-09T15:46:30.118Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"06328619-ed53-4697-8ee4-b07a28edfb8a"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"4a29538b-4ad9-47a2-8748-9f060d331b4b"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-10T00:10:28.495Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Barazandeh, Babak","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Majumdar, Subhabrata","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Michailidis, George","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Barazandeh, Babak","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Barazandeh, Babak","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"e98372d42d972dcfdb9541f3a989704a26781b204dfd3214a69ea58fe3507942:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T00:42:08.364Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"e98372d42d972dcfdb9541f3a989704a26781b204dfd3214a69ea58fe3507942","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","contentSha256":"af35cfba6d553325f09b3b6cf2bced3748422b14f45c6fae49437cd351eaa11e","textHash":"4f3c4d686bf5a23f3c4b0e55227a6bd6d2ec4144e3459d2abfe66835151b5986","observedAt":"2026-11-10T00:42:08.364Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Majumdar, Subhabrata","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Majumdar, Subhabrata","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"e98372d42d972dcfdb9541f3a989704a26781b204dfd3214a69ea58fe3507942:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T00:42:08.364Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"e98372d42d972dcfdb9541f3a989704a26781b204dfd3214a69ea58fe3507942","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","contentSha256":"af35cfba6d553325f09b3b6cf2bced3748422b14f45c6fae49437cd351eaa11e","textHash":"4f3c4d686bf5a23f3c4b0e55227a6bd6d2ec4144e3459d2abfe66835151b5986","observedAt":"2026-11-10T00:42:08.364Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Michailidis, George","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Michailidis, George","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"e98372d42d972dcfdb9541f3a989704a26781b204dfd3214a69ea58fe3507942:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T00:42:08.364Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"e98372d42d972dcfdb9541f3a989704a26781b204dfd3214a69ea58fe3507942","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","contentSha256":"af35cfba6d553325f09b3b6cf2bced3748422b14f45c6fae49437cd351eaa11e","textHash":"4f3c4d686bf5a23f3c4b0e55227a6bd6d2ec4144e3459d2abfe66835151b5986","observedAt":"2026-11-10T00:42:08.364Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":3,"returned":3,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","snapshotId":"e98372d42d972dcfdb9541f3a989704a26781b204dfd3214a69ea58fe3507942","contentSha256":"af35cfba6d553325f09b3b6cf2bced3748422b14f45c6fae49437cd351eaa11e","textHash":"4f3c4d686bf5a23f3c4b0e55227a6bd6d2ec4144e3459d2abfe66835151b5986","observedAt":"2026-11-10T00:42:08.364Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":46,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/f2b1d6c0f9febed5945511c24bd57437808d788eff200601f44cba42676a26c1/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-otap-evaluates-agent-trajectories-against-valid-f2b1d6c0","formats":{"html":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-otap-evaluates-agent-trajectories-against-valid-f2b1d6c0","markdown":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-otap-evaluates-agent-trajectories-against-valid-f2b1d6c0.md","json":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-otap-evaluates-agent-trajectories-against-valid-f2b1d6c0.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[{"id":"term-hallucination","name":"Hallucination","explanation":"When an AI system states something false or made up as if it were true.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#hallucination"},{"id":"term-benchmark","name":"Benchmark","explanation":"A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.","referenceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09110"}],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"f2b1d6c0f9febed5945511c24bd57437808d788eff200601f44cba42676a26c1","revision":"a0d92c09-36e7-44c4-804e-f897468c47a8","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"arXiv cs.AI: OTAP evaluates agent trajectories against valid solution graphs","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-otap-evaluates-agent-trajectories-against-valid-f2b1d6c0"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","revision":"4f3c4d686bf5a23f3c4b0e55227a6bd6d2ec4144e3459d2abfe66835151b5986","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"OTAP: Structure-Aware Optimal Transport for Evaluating Planning and Execution in Agent Trajectories","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"f2b1d6c0f9febed5945511c24bd57437808d788eff200601f44cba42676a26c1","title":"arXiv cs.AI: OTAP evaluates agent trajectories against valid solution graphs","argument":"Babak Barazandeh, Subhabrata Majumdar and George Michailidis propose OTAP, a way to evaluate an agent’s planning and execution by comparing its execution graph—the steps and dependencies in a run—with graphs of valid solutions. Unlike a binary success flag or exact matching, OTAP gives a normalized discrepancy score; its unbalanced marginals allow missing or hallucinated steps without forcing them to match. The authors report that, on controlled perturbations and three public benchmarks, OTAP separated valid from invalid trajectories where semantics-only metrics scored below chance. In a blinded study of 236 trajectories, it had the strongest agreement among six compared metrics. These results are encouraging, not a universal measure of agent quality: where a formal verifier exists, strict surface metrics predicted validity better. The authors place OTAP instead in open-ended domains without a verifier. They also report sensitivity to dependency extraction, and say granularity invariance remains an open problem that soft coupling only partly mitigates.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The evidence is the arXiv abstract; it does not provide the full paper’s experimental details or results. The reported benchmark and blinded-study findings are limited to the settings described in the abstract; the abstract does not establish performance across other tasks or domains. The authors report sensitivity to dependency extraction and say granularity invariance remains an open problem.","speaker":{"name":"Barazandeh, Babak, Majumdar, Subhabrata, Michailidis, George","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"OTAP: Structure-Aware Optimal Transport for Evaluating Planning and Execution in Agent Trajectories","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","publishedAt":"2026-07-19","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors define OTAP as a normalized discrepancy score comparing an agent’s execution graph with a set of valid solution graphs.","excerpt":"We reframe trajectory evaluation as a distance between the agent's execution graph and a set of valid solution graphs","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say OTAP's unbalanced marginals allow missing or hallucinated steps without forcing a match, while granularity invariance remains unresolved.","excerpt":"Its unbalanced marginals handle missing or hallucinated steps without forcing a match; granularity invariance remains an open problem","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"On controlled perturbations and three public benchmarks, the authors report that OTAP separated valid from invalid trajectories in a regime where semantics-only metrics scored below chance.","excerpt":"On controlled perturbations and three public benchmarks, OTAP separates valid from invalid trajectories in a regime where semantics-only metrics score below chance.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that strict surface metrics predicted validity better than OTAP where a formal verifier exists, and describe OTAP as suited to open-ended domains without one.","excerpt":"Where a formal verifier exists, strict surface metrics predict validity better than OTAP does, which places OTAP in open-ended domains where no verifier is available.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report sensitivity to dependency extraction in controlled edge-noise experiments.","excerpt":"while controlled edge-noise experiments reveal sensitivity to dependency extraction.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T00:42:08.364Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How does OTAP perform when trajectories differ in granularity, given that the authors say granularity invariance remains an open problem?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: OTAP evaluates agent trajectories against valid solution graphs","summary":"Babak Barazandeh, Subhabrata Majumdar and George Michailidis propose OTAP, a way to evaluate an agent’s planning and execution by comparing its execution graph—the steps and dependencies in a run—with graphs of valid solutions. Unlike a binary success flag or exact matching, OTAP gives a normalized discrepancy score; its unbalanced marginals allow missing or hallucinated steps without forcing them to match. The authors report that, on controlled perturbations and three public benchmarks, OTAP separated valid from invalid trajectories where semantics-only metrics scored below chance. In a blinded study of 236 trajectories, it had the strongest agreement among six compared metrics. These results are encouraging, not a universal measure of agent quality: where a formal verifier exists, strict surface metrics predicted validity better. The authors place OTAP instead in open-ended domains without a verifier. They also report sensitivity to dependency extraction, and say granularity invariance remains an open problem that soft coupling only partly mitigates.","question":"How does OTAP perform when trajectories differ in granularity, given that the authors say granularity invariance remains an open problem?","claims":[{"text":"The authors define OTAP as a normalized discrepancy score comparing an agent’s execution graph with a set of valid solution graphs.","excerpt":"We reframe trajectory evaluation as a distance between the agent's execution graph and a set of valid solution graphs","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say OTAP's unbalanced marginals allow missing or hallucinated steps without forcing a match, while granularity invariance remains unresolved.","excerpt":"Its unbalanced marginals handle missing or hallucinated steps without forcing a match; granularity invariance remains an open problem","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"On controlled perturbations and three public benchmarks, the authors report that OTAP separated valid from invalid trajectories in a regime where semantics-only metrics scored below chance.","excerpt":"On controlled perturbations and three public benchmarks, OTAP separates valid from invalid trajectories in a regime where semantics-only metrics score below chance.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that strict surface metrics predicted validity better than OTAP where a formal verifier exists, and describe OTAP as suited to open-ended domains without one.","excerpt":"Where a formal verifier exists, strict surface metrics predict validity better than OTAP does, which places OTAP in open-ended domains where no verifier is available.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report sensitivity to dependency extraction in controlled edge-noise experiments.","excerpt":"while controlled edge-noise experiments reveal sensitivity to dependency extraction.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The evidence is the arXiv abstract; it does not provide the full paper’s experimental details or results.","The reported benchmark and blinded-study findings are limited to the settings described in the abstract; the abstract does not establish performance across other tasks or domains.","The authors report sensitivity to dependency extraction and say granularity invariance remains an open problem."],"mediaId":"bfa0bb5cc537e671411ea13e4b791dd923ea2e6567e02072b1d1ff03d98dbbdb","correctionReason":null,"id":"f2b1d6c0f9febed5945511c24bd57437808d788eff200601f44cba42676a26c1","publicationId":"a0d92c09-36e7-44c4-804e-f897468c47a8","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","sourceTitle":"OTAP: Structure-Aware Optimal Transport for Evaluating Planning and Execution in Agent Trajectories","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-07-19","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-05T05:00:27.136Z","createdAt":"2026-11-10T00:10:28.495Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"bfa0bb5cc537e671411ea13e4b791dd923ea2e6567e02072b1d1ff03d98dbbdb","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T15:46:30.278Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T00:42:08.364Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"bfa0bb5cc537e671411ea13e4b791dd923ea2e6567e02072b1d1ff03d98dbbdb","confidence":0.79,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"fa4b93fc417bd7dc915f0f22721cff41675bc9b3a891f709ab2d0f7feebacd5c","decidedAt":"2026-11-09T15:46:31.384Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"4f3c4d686bf5a23f3c4b0e55227a6bd6d2ec4144e3459d2abfe66835151b5986","observationId":"14dd983a4b4116ed4aca90a8c96c75036e31e8852bf0c6487adc86227a18a117","retrievedAt":"2026-11-09T15:46:30.118Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"06328619-ed53-4697-8ee4-b07a28edfb8a"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"4a29538b-4ad9-47a2-8748-9f060d331b4b"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-10T00:10:28.495Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Barazandeh, Babak","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Majumdar, Subhabrata","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Michailidis, George","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Barazandeh, Babak","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Barazandeh, Babak","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"e98372d42d972dcfdb9541f3a989704a26781b204dfd3214a69ea58fe3507942:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T00:42:08.364Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"e98372d42d972dcfdb9541f3a989704a26781b204dfd3214a69ea58fe3507942","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","contentSha256":"af35cfba6d553325f09b3b6cf2bced3748422b14f45c6fae49437cd351eaa11e","textHash":"4f3c4d686bf5a23f3c4b0e55227a6bd6d2ec4144e3459d2abfe66835151b5986","observedAt":"2026-11-10T00:42:08.364Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Majumdar, Subhabrata","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Majumdar, Subhabrata","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"e98372d42d972dcfdb9541f3a989704a26781b204dfd3214a69ea58fe3507942:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T00:42:08.364Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"e98372d42d972dcfdb9541f3a989704a26781b204dfd3214a69ea58fe3507942","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","contentSha256":"af35cfba6d553325f09b3b6cf2bced3748422b14f45c6fae49437cd351eaa11e","textHash":"4f3c4d686bf5a23f3c4b0e55227a6bd6d2ec4144e3459d2abfe66835151b5986","observedAt":"2026-11-10T00:42:08.364Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Michailidis, George","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Michailidis, George","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"e98372d42d972dcfdb9541f3a989704a26781b204dfd3214a69ea58fe3507942:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T00:42:08.364Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"e98372d42d972dcfdb9541f3a989704a26781b204dfd3214a69ea58fe3507942","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","contentSha256":"af35cfba6d553325f09b3b6cf2bced3748422b14f45c6fae49437cd351eaa11e","textHash":"4f3c4d686bf5a23f3c4b0e55227a6bd6d2ec4144e3459d2abfe66835151b5986","observedAt":"2026-11-10T00:42:08.364Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":3,"returned":3,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17082","snapshotId":"e98372d42d972dcfdb9541f3a989704a26781b204dfd3214a69ea58fe3507942","contentSha256":"af35cfba6d553325f09b3b6cf2bced3748422b14f45c6fae49437cd351eaa11e","textHash":"4f3c4d686bf5a23f3c4b0e55227a6bd6d2ec4144e3459d2abfe66835151b5986","observedAt":"2026-11-10T00:42:08.364Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":46,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/f2b1d6c0f9febed5945511c24bd57437808d788eff200601f44cba42676a26c1/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"a0d92c09-36e7-44c4-804e-f897468c47a8","verdict":"uncertain","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The draft correctly names Babak Barazandeh, Subhabrata Majumdar and George Michailidis as the authors of the arXiv paper. It also attributes the method and the results to them as reported findings rather than established facts.","excerpt":"Authors:Babak Barazandeh, Subhabrata Majumdar, George Michailidis"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"uncertain","explanation":"The summary is faithful but loses two key points. It omits the authors' motivation: success flags cannot tell sound runs from lucky ones, and exact matching penalizes valid reordered plans. It also omits the caveat that structure-aware baselines score higher clean-graph AUROC, while OTAP mainly shows the smallest decline under edge noise. Without that caveat, readers may overrate OTAP. Smallest repairs: add one motivation sentence and the AUROC trade-off. Also give a plain gloss of 'agent' and 'granularity invariance', which the question depends on.","excerpt":"A success flag cannot distinguish sound solutions from lucky ones, nor explain why runs fail. Exact matching penalizes valid plans reordered or decomposed differently."},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The originalPublished date of 2026-07-19 matches the v1 submission date. It is not the later v3 revision of 3 Nov 2026 or the feed date of 5 Nov 2026.","excerpt":"Submitted on 19 Jul 2026 (v1), last revised 3 Nov 2026 (this version, v3)"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"Each claim matches a verbatim excerpt and is framed as the authors' report. 'Encouraging' echoes the source's own word. The verifier caveat, the dependency-extraction sensitivity and the open granularity problem are all preserved. The limitations do not invent benefits or costs, and the question follows from a gap the source itself states.","excerpt":"Its performance is encouraging across these settings, while controlled edge-noise experiments reveal sensitivity to dependency extraction."},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified direct link to the arXiv abstract page. It is the original source, and no better source media was found.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-10T00:10:28.495Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}