{"id":"22653b739c33eeb96683585b64a3f68e903516ce458ee91f36f467134c0c6998","title":"arXiv cs.AI paper argues financial detector scores hide error types","argument":"Xiongyu Chen, Sizhen Zhu and Zhuoer Wang argue that a single binary score can hide important weaknesses in hallucination detectors for financial question answering. On PHANTOM, a benchmark built from SEC filings, they analyze hallucination types and report that an LLM-based detector achieved 80.2% binary accuracy but 44.7% subtype accuracy. It never assigned two of the nine categories, and the share of hallucinations it missed varied by category. The authors then propose a two-stage hierarchical detector: it first decides whether an answer is hallucinated, then assigns a subtype. In their evaluation, this approach reached 95.6% binary accuracy and 56.1% subtype accuracy. The paper’s central point is that type-level evaluation exposes weaknesses that aggregate scores conceal. That distinction could matter when financial answers are used in investment, compliance or client decisions, where knowing an answer is unreliable may be less informative than identifying how it is wrong. The abstract does not establish how well either detector performs outside this benchmark. How would the proposed detector perform on financial questions and filings beyond PHANTOM?","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract; it does not provide experimental details needed to assess the methods or results fully. The abstract does not report how the proposed detector performs outside PHANTOM or on other financial filings and questions.","speaker":{"name":"Chen, Xiongyu, Zhu, Sizhen, Wang, Zhuoer","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Beyond Binary Detection: Type-Aware Hallucination Analysis and Hierarchical Detection in Financial Question Answering","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","publishedAt":"2026-11-01","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors argue that binary evaluation can conceal detector weaknesses that type-level evaluation reveals.","excerpt":"The results show that type-level evaluation exposes detector weaknesses that aggregate metrics conceal.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The paper evaluates hallucination detection on PHANTOM, a long-context benchmark built from SEC filings.","excerpt":"This paper studies hallucination detection on PHANTOM, a long-context benchmark built from SEC filings","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The LLM-based detector achieved 80.2% binary accuracy and 44.7% subtype accuracy on the described evaluation.","excerpt":"The detector reaches 80.2% binary accuracy but only 44.7% subtype accuracy","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The detector never assigned two of the nine categories, and its missed hallucinations varied by category.","excerpt":"never assigns two of the nine categories, and misses between 5.3% and 46.8% of hallucinations depending on category","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors propose a two-stage hierarchical detector, reporting higher binary and subtype accuracy on their evaluation.","excerpt":"raising binary accuracy to 95.6% and subtype accuracy to 56.1%.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The paper connects unfaithful financial answers to possible harm in investment, compliance or client decisions.","excerpt":"an unfaithful answer can mislead investment, compliance, or client decisions.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","checkedAt":"2026-11-07T08:50:07.775Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How would the proposed detector perform on financial questions and filings beyond PHANTOM?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI paper argues financial detector scores hide error types","summary":"Xiongyu Chen, Sizhen Zhu and Zhuoer Wang argue that a single binary score can hide important weaknesses in hallucination detectors for financial question answering. On PHANTOM, a benchmark built from SEC filings, they analyze hallucination types and report that an LLM-based detector achieved 80.2% binary accuracy but 44.7% subtype accuracy. It never assigned two of the nine categories, and the share of hallucinations it missed varied by category. The authors then propose a two-stage hierarchical detector: it first decides whether an answer is hallucinated, then assigns a subtype. In their evaluation, this approach reached 95.6% binary accuracy and 56.1% subtype accuracy. The paper’s central point is that type-level evaluation exposes weaknesses that aggregate scores conceal. That distinction could matter when financial answers are used in investment, compliance or client decisions, where knowing an answer is unreliable may be less informative than identifying how it is wrong. The abstract does not establish how well either detector performs outside this benchmark. How would the proposed detector perform on financial questions and filings beyond PHANTOM?","question":"How would the proposed detector perform on financial questions and filings beyond PHANTOM?","claims":[{"text":"The authors argue that binary evaluation can conceal detector weaknesses that type-level evaluation reveals.","excerpt":"The results show that type-level evaluation exposes detector weaknesses that aggregate metrics conceal.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The paper evaluates hallucination detection on PHANTOM, a long-context benchmark built from SEC filings.","excerpt":"This paper studies hallucination detection on PHANTOM, a long-context benchmark built from SEC filings","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The LLM-based detector achieved 80.2% binary accuracy and 44.7% subtype accuracy on the described evaluation.","excerpt":"The detector reaches 80.2% binary accuracy but only 44.7% subtype accuracy","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The detector never assigned two of the nine categories, and its missed hallucinations varied by category.","excerpt":"never assigns two of the nine categories, and misses between 5.3% and 46.8% of hallucinations depending on category","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors propose a two-stage hierarchical detector, reporting higher binary and subtype accuracy on their evaluation.","excerpt":"raising binary accuracy to 95.6% and subtype accuracy to 56.1%.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The paper connects unfaithful financial answers to possible harm in investment, compliance or client decisions.","excerpt":"an unfaithful answer can mislead investment, compliance, or client decisions.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract; it does not provide experimental details needed to assess the methods or results fully.","The abstract does not report how the proposed detector performs outside PHANTOM or on other financial filings and questions."],"mediaId":"1c64630c19f90b935adba3a2646d39d33b1df38adc786bfcb4375264e5c55053","correctionReason":null,"id":"22653b739c33eeb96683585b64a3f68e903516ce458ee91f36f467134c0c6998","publicationId":"4b0411e3-d614-4405-8cab-7f9023389f30","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","sourceTitle":"Beyond Binary Detection: Type-Aware Hallucination Analysis and Hierarchical Detection in Financial Question Answering","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-01","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-03T09:04:17.912Z","createdAt":"2026-11-07T07:46:12.873Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"1c64630c19f90b935adba3a2646d39d33b1df38adc786bfcb4375264e5c55053","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-04T04:47:24.016Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","checkedAt":"2026-11-07T08:50:07.775Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"1c64630c19f90b935adba3a2646d39d33b1df38adc786bfcb4375264e5c55053","confidence":0.8400000000000001,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"e8affb88750140fd7295ef3707da5c452c2b69ccf98535de346b9cdb6b9b81d3","decidedAt":"2026-11-04T04:47:25.270Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"ca124d06474301277593385134381f856771bd9ba0b4eb02137e7710eeb8e99e","observationId":"abbfc1ddf3d641f9f3905c9fee29a7b814dc6423eb83c8554a0a39f75f2487fb","retrievedAt":"2026-11-04T04:47:23.823Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"ca7f0897-6e96-42f8-8f50-a3a8ab530faf"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"e5de26cc-962a-4b24-89d2-40f2bc8dd087"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-07T07:46:12.873Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Chen, Xiongyu","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Zhu, Sizhen","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Wang, Zhuoer","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Chen, Xiongyu","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Chen, Xiongyu","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"2e47a0ada6036bf7f381d507123d74ffbf39473016f29c1a0ddfb117a44e6b9f:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-07T08:50:07.775Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"2e47a0ada6036bf7f381d507123d74ffbf39473016f29c1a0ddfb117a44e6b9f","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","contentSha256":"21d0cc94ea0b54be4e4244efd66db60cd503542fe9276534bb9f49cc07147ae0","textHash":"ca124d06474301277593385134381f856771bd9ba0b4eb02137e7710eeb8e99e","observedAt":"2026-11-07T08:50:07.775Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Zhu, Sizhen","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Zhu, Sizhen","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"2e47a0ada6036bf7f381d507123d74ffbf39473016f29c1a0ddfb117a44e6b9f:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-07T08:50:07.775Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"2e47a0ada6036bf7f381d507123d74ffbf39473016f29c1a0ddfb117a44e6b9f","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","contentSha256":"21d0cc94ea0b54be4e4244efd66db60cd503542fe9276534bb9f49cc07147ae0","textHash":"ca124d06474301277593385134381f856771bd9ba0b4eb02137e7710eeb8e99e","observedAt":"2026-11-07T08:50:07.775Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Wang, Zhuoer","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Wang, Zhuoer","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"2e47a0ada6036bf7f381d507123d74ffbf39473016f29c1a0ddfb117a44e6b9f:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-07T08:50:07.775Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"2e47a0ada6036bf7f381d507123d74ffbf39473016f29c1a0ddfb117a44e6b9f","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","contentSha256":"21d0cc94ea0b54be4e4244efd66db60cd503542fe9276534bb9f49cc07147ae0","textHash":"ca124d06474301277593385134381f856771bd9ba0b4eb02137e7710eeb8e99e","observedAt":"2026-11-07T08:50:07.775Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":3,"returned":3,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","snapshotId":"2e47a0ada6036bf7f381d507123d74ffbf39473016f29c1a0ddfb117a44e6b9f","contentSha256":"21d0cc94ea0b54be4e4244efd66db60cd503542fe9276534bb9f49cc07147ae0","textHash":"ca124d06474301277593385134381f856771bd9ba0b4eb02137e7710eeb8e99e","observedAt":"2026-11-07T08:50:07.775Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":43,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/22653b739c33eeb96683585b64a3f68e903516ce458ee91f36f467134c0c6998/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-paper-argues-financial-detector-scores-hide-error-22653b73","formats":{"html":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-paper-argues-financial-detector-scores-hide-error-22653b73","markdown":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-paper-argues-financial-detector-scores-hide-error-22653b73.md","json":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-paper-argues-financial-detector-scores-hide-error-22653b73.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[{"id":"term-hallucination","name":"Hallucination","explanation":"When an AI system states something false or made up as if it were true.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#hallucination"},{"id":"term-benchmark","name":"Benchmark","explanation":"A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.","referenceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09110"},{"id":"term-llm","name":"Large language model","explanation":"A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#large-language-model"}],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"22653b739c33eeb96683585b64a3f68e903516ce458ee91f36f467134c0c6998","revision":"4b0411e3-d614-4405-8cab-7f9023389f30","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"arXiv cs.AI paper argues financial detector scores hide error types","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-paper-argues-financial-detector-scores-hide-error-22653b73"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","revision":"ca124d06474301277593385134381f856771bd9ba0b4eb02137e7710eeb8e99e","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Beyond Binary Detection: Type-Aware Hallucination Analysis and Hierarchical Detection in Financial Question Answering","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"22653b739c33eeb96683585b64a3f68e903516ce458ee91f36f467134c0c6998","title":"arXiv cs.AI paper argues financial detector scores hide error types","argument":"Xiongyu Chen, Sizhen Zhu and Zhuoer Wang argue that a single binary score can hide important weaknesses in hallucination detectors for financial question answering. On PHANTOM, a benchmark built from SEC filings, they analyze hallucination types and report that an LLM-based detector achieved 80.2% binary accuracy but 44.7% subtype accuracy. It never assigned two of the nine categories, and the share of hallucinations it missed varied by category. The authors then propose a two-stage hierarchical detector: it first decides whether an answer is hallucinated, then assigns a subtype. In their evaluation, this approach reached 95.6% binary accuracy and 56.1% subtype accuracy. The paper’s central point is that type-level evaluation exposes weaknesses that aggregate scores conceal. That distinction could matter when financial answers are used in investment, compliance or client decisions, where knowing an answer is unreliable may be less informative than identifying how it is wrong. The abstract does not establish how well either detector performs outside this benchmark. How would the proposed detector perform on financial questions and filings beyond PHANTOM?","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract; it does not provide experimental details needed to assess the methods or results fully. The abstract does not report how the proposed detector performs outside PHANTOM or on other financial filings and questions.","speaker":{"name":"Chen, Xiongyu, Zhu, Sizhen, Wang, Zhuoer","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Beyond Binary Detection: Type-Aware Hallucination Analysis and Hierarchical Detection in Financial Question Answering","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","publishedAt":"2026-11-01","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors argue that binary evaluation can conceal detector weaknesses that type-level evaluation reveals.","excerpt":"The results show that type-level evaluation exposes detector weaknesses that aggregate metrics conceal.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The paper evaluates hallucination detection on PHANTOM, a long-context benchmark built from SEC filings.","excerpt":"This paper studies hallucination detection on PHANTOM, a long-context benchmark built from SEC filings","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The LLM-based detector achieved 80.2% binary accuracy and 44.7% subtype accuracy on the described evaluation.","excerpt":"The detector reaches 80.2% binary accuracy but only 44.7% subtype accuracy","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The detector never assigned two of the nine categories, and its missed hallucinations varied by category.","excerpt":"never assigns two of the nine categories, and misses between 5.3% and 46.8% of hallucinations depending on category","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors propose a two-stage hierarchical detector, reporting higher binary and subtype accuracy on their evaluation.","excerpt":"raising binary accuracy to 95.6% and subtype accuracy to 56.1%.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The paper connects unfaithful financial answers to possible harm in investment, compliance or client decisions.","excerpt":"an unfaithful answer can mislead investment, compliance, or client decisions.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","checkedAt":"2026-11-07T08:50:07.775Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How would the proposed detector perform on financial questions and filings beyond PHANTOM?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI paper argues financial detector scores hide error types","summary":"Xiongyu Chen, Sizhen Zhu and Zhuoer Wang argue that a single binary score can hide important weaknesses in hallucination detectors for financial question answering. On PHANTOM, a benchmark built from SEC filings, they analyze hallucination types and report that an LLM-based detector achieved 80.2% binary accuracy but 44.7% subtype accuracy. It never assigned two of the nine categories, and the share of hallucinations it missed varied by category. The authors then propose a two-stage hierarchical detector: it first decides whether an answer is hallucinated, then assigns a subtype. In their evaluation, this approach reached 95.6% binary accuracy and 56.1% subtype accuracy. The paper’s central point is that type-level evaluation exposes weaknesses that aggregate scores conceal. That distinction could matter when financial answers are used in investment, compliance or client decisions, where knowing an answer is unreliable may be less informative than identifying how it is wrong. The abstract does not establish how well either detector performs outside this benchmark. How would the proposed detector perform on financial questions and filings beyond PHANTOM?","question":"How would the proposed detector perform on financial questions and filings beyond PHANTOM?","claims":[{"text":"The authors argue that binary evaluation can conceal detector weaknesses that type-level evaluation reveals.","excerpt":"The results show that type-level evaluation exposes detector weaknesses that aggregate metrics conceal.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The paper evaluates hallucination detection on PHANTOM, a long-context benchmark built from SEC filings.","excerpt":"This paper studies hallucination detection on PHANTOM, a long-context benchmark built from SEC filings","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The LLM-based detector achieved 80.2% binary accuracy and 44.7% subtype accuracy on the described evaluation.","excerpt":"The detector reaches 80.2% binary accuracy but only 44.7% subtype accuracy","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The detector never assigned two of the nine categories, and its missed hallucinations varied by category.","excerpt":"never assigns two of the nine categories, and misses between 5.3% and 46.8% of hallucinations depending on category","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors propose a two-stage hierarchical detector, reporting higher binary and subtype accuracy on their evaluation.","excerpt":"raising binary accuracy to 95.6% and subtype accuracy to 56.1%.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The paper connects unfaithful financial answers to possible harm in investment, compliance or client decisions.","excerpt":"an unfaithful answer can mislead investment, compliance, or client decisions.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract; it does not provide experimental details needed to assess the methods or results fully.","The abstract does not report how the proposed detector performs outside PHANTOM or on other financial filings and questions."],"mediaId":"1c64630c19f90b935adba3a2646d39d33b1df38adc786bfcb4375264e5c55053","correctionReason":null,"id":"22653b739c33eeb96683585b64a3f68e903516ce458ee91f36f467134c0c6998","publicationId":"4b0411e3-d614-4405-8cab-7f9023389f30","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","sourceTitle":"Beyond Binary Detection: Type-Aware Hallucination Analysis and Hierarchical Detection in Financial Question Answering","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-01","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-03T09:04:17.912Z","createdAt":"2026-11-07T07:46:12.873Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"1c64630c19f90b935adba3a2646d39d33b1df38adc786bfcb4375264e5c55053","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-04T04:47:24.016Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","checkedAt":"2026-11-07T08:50:07.775Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"1c64630c19f90b935adba3a2646d39d33b1df38adc786bfcb4375264e5c55053","confidence":0.8400000000000001,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"e8affb88750140fd7295ef3707da5c452c2b69ccf98535de346b9cdb6b9b81d3","decidedAt":"2026-11-04T04:47:25.270Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"ca124d06474301277593385134381f856771bd9ba0b4eb02137e7710eeb8e99e","observationId":"abbfc1ddf3d641f9f3905c9fee29a7b814dc6423eb83c8554a0a39f75f2487fb","retrievedAt":"2026-11-04T04:47:23.823Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"ca7f0897-6e96-42f8-8f50-a3a8ab530faf"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"e5de26cc-962a-4b24-89d2-40f2bc8dd087"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-07T07:46:12.873Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Chen, Xiongyu","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Zhu, Sizhen","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Wang, Zhuoer","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Chen, Xiongyu","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Chen, Xiongyu","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"2e47a0ada6036bf7f381d507123d74ffbf39473016f29c1a0ddfb117a44e6b9f:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-07T08:50:07.775Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"2e47a0ada6036bf7f381d507123d74ffbf39473016f29c1a0ddfb117a44e6b9f","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","contentSha256":"21d0cc94ea0b54be4e4244efd66db60cd503542fe9276534bb9f49cc07147ae0","textHash":"ca124d06474301277593385134381f856771bd9ba0b4eb02137e7710eeb8e99e","observedAt":"2026-11-07T08:50:07.775Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Zhu, Sizhen","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Zhu, Sizhen","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"2e47a0ada6036bf7f381d507123d74ffbf39473016f29c1a0ddfb117a44e6b9f:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-07T08:50:07.775Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"2e47a0ada6036bf7f381d507123d74ffbf39473016f29c1a0ddfb117a44e6b9f","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","contentSha256":"21d0cc94ea0b54be4e4244efd66db60cd503542fe9276534bb9f49cc07147ae0","textHash":"ca124d06474301277593385134381f856771bd9ba0b4eb02137e7710eeb8e99e","observedAt":"2026-11-07T08:50:07.775Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Wang, Zhuoer","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Wang, Zhuoer","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"2e47a0ada6036bf7f381d507123d74ffbf39473016f29c1a0ddfb117a44e6b9f:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-07T08:50:07.775Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"2e47a0ada6036bf7f381d507123d74ffbf39473016f29c1a0ddfb117a44e6b9f","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","contentSha256":"21d0cc94ea0b54be4e4244efd66db60cd503542fe9276534bb9f49cc07147ae0","textHash":"ca124d06474301277593385134381f856771bd9ba0b4eb02137e7710eeb8e99e","observedAt":"2026-11-07T08:50:07.775Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":3,"returned":3,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02258","snapshotId":"2e47a0ada6036bf7f381d507123d74ffbf39473016f29c1a0ddfb117a44e6b9f","contentSha256":"21d0cc94ea0b54be4e4244efd66db60cd503542fe9276534bb9f49cc07147ae0","textHash":"ca124d06474301277593385134381f856771bd9ba0b4eb02137e7710eeb8e99e","observedAt":"2026-11-07T08:50:07.775Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":43,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/22653b739c33eeb96683585b64a3f68e903516ce458ee91f36f467134c0c6998/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"4b0411e3-d614-4405-8cab-7f9023389f30","verdict":"uncertain","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The paper is correctly attributed to Xiongyu Chen, Sizhen Zhu and Zhuoer Wang on arXiv cs.AI. Findings and the central argument are framed as the authors' reports, not as established fact.","excerpt":"Authors:Xiongyu Chen, Sizhen Zhu, Zhuoer Wang"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"pass","explanation":"The title, summary and question match the abstract's thesis and key numbers. The question is a real open issue. Central terms such as hallucination and LLM-based detector are kept exactly, which suits tooltip treatment, and the plain context is adequate. The draft omits the detector-free finding that hallucinated answers are over twice as long, and that misses rise with distance from the correct answer. These omissions are not essential to the central point.","excerpt":"The results show that type-level evaluation exposes detector weaknesses that aggregate metrics conceal."},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"originalPublished 2026-11-01 matches the v1 submission date on arXiv. The feed date of 2026-11-03 is correctly not used.","excerpt":"[Submitted on 1 Nov 2026]"},{"dimension":"support","status":"uncertain","explanation":"All numeric and argument claims are source-stated. One sentence goes beyond the abstract: 'knowing an answer is unreliable may be less informative than identifying how it is wrong.' The source argues that type-level evaluation exposes detector weaknesses. It does not claim that subtype labels are more useful to end decision-makers. The sentence is hedged, but it is neither labeled as Escape Meridian interpretation nor grounded in the source. Smallest repair: tie the stakes to detector evaluation, for example that aggregate scores could hide which kinds of misleading answers slip through. Alternatively, label the sentence as EM interpretation.","excerpt":"an unfaithful answer can mislead investment, compliance, or client decisions."},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified arXiv abstract page of the source itself. It is the most direct way to access the paper.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-07T07:46:12.873Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}