# arXiv cs.AI paper describes smartphone obstacle alerts for pedestrians [Canonical reading](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-paper-describes-smartphone-obstacle-alerts-for-113ee083) Abtin Zandi and coauthors present a Kotlin-based Android application intended to alert visually impaired and distracted pedestrians to urban obstacles. Their system retrains YOLOv8 to recognize eighteen obstacle classes and combines detection with ARCore-based or monocular focal-length distance estimation, using a single smartphone camera rather than specialized sensors. The authors say pruning, quantization, and early-exit branches reduced average inference latency on a mid-range smartphone from about 3.2 seconds with off-the-shelf YOLOv8n to 0.39–0.48 seconds. Their recommended INT8 quantization with early exit runs in 0.42–0.48 seconds while retaining a recall of 0.81. The application provides Text-to-Speech guidance for visually impaired users and vibration alerts for distracted pedestrians. Escape Meridian interpretation: the approach could provide obstacle alerts through ordinary smartphones, but the abstract’s latency and recall results do not establish how well the system works in everyday use. The abstract does not report distance-estimation accuracy, leaving that aspect of the proposed assistance unclear. Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims. ## Original source arXiv cs.AI · Article Original source date: Oct 7, 2026 (2026-10-07). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-10T09:40:18.791Z. First observed: 2026-11-03T08:58:49.146Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-04T02:45:54.236Z. - [Real-Time Obstacle Detection and Distance Estimation on Smartphones for Visually Impaired and Distracted Pedestrians](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00040) ## Limits The abstract reports latency and recall results on a mid-range smartphone but does not specify the evaluation conditions or establish performance in everyday use. The abstract describes ARCore-based or monocular focal-length distance estimation but gives no distance-estimation accuracy result. ## Open question How accurately does the application estimate obstacle distances? ## Source-stated The authors present an Android application using a retrained YOLOv8 detector to alert visually impaired and distracted pedestrians to obstacles. > We present a Kotlin-based Android application that uses a YOLOv8 detector, retrained to recognize eighteen common urban obstacle classes - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00040) ## Source-stated On a mid-range smartphone, the authors report that optimizations reduced average inference latency from about 3.2 seconds to 0.39–0.48 seconds; the recommended configuration retained a recall of 0.81. > the recommended configuration (INT8 quantization with early exit) runs in 0.42-0.48 s while retaining a recall of 0.81. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00040) ## Source-stated The authors say the application combines the detector with distance estimation and feedback modes for different users. > The application combines the optimized detector with ARCore-based or monocular focal-length distance estimation, so it works with a single smartphone camera and requires no LiDAR, depth camera, or other specialized sensor. Multimodal feedback, including Text-to-Speech guidance for visually impaired - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00040) ## Escape Meridian interpretation The abstract reports detector latency and recall, but does not give a distance-estimation accuracy result. > The application combines the optimized detector with ARCore-based or monocular focal-length distance estimation - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00040) ## Source and contributor context Zandi, Abtin, Nami, Sarvin, Ganjipour, Roza, Kermani, Bardia Sabagh, Tarabkhah, Amirreza, Farbeh, Hamed · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## Quantization Storing a model's numbers at lower precision so it uses less memory and runs faster, sometimes at a cost in accuracy. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#quantization) ## Latency The delay between sending a request and receiving the result. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#latency) ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: 72caefb7-e8a7-4f49-8200-9a637e64407d. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-10T09:40:18.791Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: 5b23afb871eb3d418b948d67e74484fe832bd97f6f8405248020ad50f34e7648. Source text hash: 5882be61365cfb7a8ca4ea5694146d09aa9475e3298d39254a712d05ce01d284. ## Revision and source-check history ### Version 1 — 2026-11-10T09:40:18.791Z Abtin Zandi and coauthors present a Kotlin-based Android application intended to alert visually impaired and distracted pedestrians to urban obstacles. Their system retrains YOLOv8 to recognize eighteen obstacle classes and combines detection with ARCore-based or monocular focal-length distance estimation, using a single smartphone camera rather than specialized sensors. The authors say pruning, quantization, and early-exit branches reduced average inference latency on a mid-range smartphone from about 3.2 seconds with off-the-shelf YOLOv8n to 0.39–0.48 seconds. Their recommended INT8 quantization with early exit runs in 0.42–0.48 seconds while retaining a recall of 0.81. The application provides Text-to-Speech guidance for visually impaired users and vibration alerts for distracted pedestrians. Escape Meridian interpretation: the approach could provide obstacle alerts through ordinary smartphones, but the abstract’s latency and recall results do not establish how well the system works in everyday use. The abstract does not report distance-estimation accuracy, leaving that aspect of the proposed assistance unclear. ## Original source arXiv cs.AI · Article Original source date: Oct 7, 2026 (2026-10-07). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-10T09:40:18.791Z. First observed: 2026-11-03T08:58:49.146Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-04T02:45:54.236Z. - [Real-Time Obstacle Detection and Distance Estimation on Smartphones for Visually Impaired and Distracted Pedestrians](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00040) ## Limits The abstract reports latency and recall results on a mid-range smartphone but does not specify the evaluation conditions or establish performance in everyday use. The abstract describes ARCore-based or monocular focal-length distance estimation but gives no distance-estimation accuracy result. ## Open question How accurately does the application estimate obstacle distances? ## Source-stated The authors present an Android application using a retrained YOLOv8 detector to alert visually impaired and distracted pedestrians to obstacles. > We present a Kotlin-based Android application that uses a YOLOv8 detector, retrained to recognize eighteen common urban obstacle classes - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00040) ## Source-stated On a mid-range smartphone, the authors report that optimizations reduced average inference latency from about 3.2 seconds to 0.39–0.48 seconds; the recommended configuration retained a recall of 0.81. > the recommended configuration (INT8 quantization with early exit) runs in 0.42-0.48 s while retaining a recall of 0.81. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00040) ## Source-stated The authors say the application combines the detector with distance estimation and feedback modes for different users. > The application combines the optimized detector with ARCore-based or monocular focal-length distance estimation, so it works with a single smartphone camera and requires no LiDAR, depth camera, or other specialized sensor. Multimodal feedback, including Text-to-Speech guidance for visually impaired - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00040) ## Escape Meridian interpretation The abstract reports detector latency and recall, but does not give a distance-estimation accuracy result. > The application combines the optimized detector with ARCore-based or monocular focal-length distance estimation - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00040) ## Source and contributor context Zandi, Abtin, Nami, Sarvin, Ganjipour, Roza, Kermani, Bardia Sabagh, Tarabkhah, Amirreza, Farbeh, Hamed · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## Quantization Storing a model's numbers at lower precision so it uses less memory and runs faster, sometimes at a cost in accuracy. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#quantization) ## Latency The delay between sending a request and receiving the result. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#latency) ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: 72caefb7-e8a7-4f49-8200-9a637e64407d. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-10T09:40:18.791Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: 5b23afb871eb3d418b948d67e74484fe832bd97f6f8405248020ad50f34e7648. Source text hash: 5882be61365cfb7a8ca4ea5694146d09aa9475e3298d39254a712d05ce01d284. ### passed — 2026-11-10T09:40:18.791Z — anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 Publication: 72caefb7-e8a7-4f49-8200-9a637e64407d attribution — pass: The draft attributes the app and its results to Abtin Zandi and coauthors, matching the listed authors. arXiv lists the paper primarily under cs.CV, with cross-listing in cs.AI, so the title's 'arXiv cs.AI paper' label is accurate. The reported results are framed as the authors' statements. > Authors:Abtin Zandi, Sarvin Nami, Roza Ganjipour, Bardia Sabagh Kermani, Amirreza Tarabkhah, Hamed Farbeh summary — pass: The summary leads with the actor and the development: a smartphone app that alerts visually impaired and distracted pedestrians to obstacles. It keeps the user groups, the single-camera design, the latency and recall figures, and the feedback modes. Technical terms such as recall, quantization and early exit are kept exactly and can be explained through term tooltips. The question addresses a genuine gap the source leaves open. The WHO motivation is omitted, which is acceptable. > to deliver real-time obstacle alerts for both user groups date — pass: The originalPublished value, 2026-10-07, matches the v1 submission date shown on the arXiv page. The later feed date of 2026-11-03 was correctly not used. > \[Submitted on 7 Oct 2026\] support — pass: The numbers match the abstract exactly: about 3.2 s reduced to 0.39-0.48 s, and the recommended configuration at 0.42-0.48 s with a recall of 0.81. The interpretation is labeled and conditional, and it does not turn the latency and recall figures into real-world reliability. The abstract does describe distance estimation without reporting its accuracy, so the stated gap is accurate. > these optimizations reduced average inference latency from about 3.2 s for the off-the-shelf YOLOv8n to 0.39-0.48 s media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct link to the arXiv abstract page, which is the original source. No other source media was found. ## Recorded references Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter. No public references recorded here yet. [Reference data (JSON)](/readings/113ee083b4f884324f684c0d1993e6c8e31da5bd5b1998693d51708350deafb4/references.json) ## Corrections and challenges [Send a correction or an opposing source](https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/) [JSON record](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-paper-describes-smartphone-obstacle-alerts-for-113ee083.json)