{"id":"906c1bee3a770e089ba62e62ab32e10241f81e2fbff0e403ee7964c0a3b190af","title":"arXiv cs.AI paper pairs finance professionals’ critiques with LLM-driven dataset refinement","argument":"In their paper, Honson Ling, Kidus Admassu and Stephanie Rosenthal present SME-C (Subject Matter Expert Critique), a human-AI workflow for building response datasets and evaluation rubrics. Finance professionals critique candidate responses; LLM-driven analysis then uses written critiques or preference votes to refine the responses and rubrics iteratively. The authors tested the approach on financial business briefs, collecting 3,853 critiques from 411 professionals on 520 queries across two survey rounds. In a blind validation survey with 100 additional professionals, both refinement strategies improved quality over experts’ top-ranked baseline responses, according to the authors. The gains were concentrated among weaker original responses: critique-based refinement produced more domain-grounded improvements, while vote-based refinement was more effective at identifying and removing irrelevant content. The authors say the resulting resources support reproducible offline evaluation and benchmarking, and argue that structured expert critique could build domain-specific evaluation resources more quickly and at lower cost than expert authoring. Escape Meridian interpretation: because the reported study concerns financial business briefs, whether the approach works similarly in other domains remains an open question.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The reported validation concerns financial business briefs; the supplied abstract does not report results from other domains. The evidence supplied is the paper’s abstract, which summarizes the reported findings but does not provide the full study methods or results.","speaker":{"name":"Ling, Honson, Admassu, Kidus, Rosenthal, Stephanie","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Pairing Expert Critique with LLM-Driven Refinement: An Iterative Approach for Curating Quality AI Evaluation Datasets","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","publishedAt":"2026-11-03","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors present SME-C, a workflow combining lightweight expert critiques with LLM-driven analysis and refinement to curate response datasets and evaluation rubrics.","excerpt":"We present SME-C (Subject Matter Expert Critique), a human-AI workflow that captures expertise through lightweight critiques of candidate responses and complements it with LLM-driven analysis and refinement","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The study collected 3,853 critiques from 411 finance professionals on 520 queries across two survey rounds.","excerpt":"collecting 3,853 critiques from 411 finance professionals on 520 queries across two survey rounds","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"In a blind validation survey, both refinement strategies improved quality over the experts’ top-ranked baseline responses.","excerpt":"In a blind validation survey with 100 additional professionals, we found that both strategies significantly improved quality over the experts' top-ranked baseline responses.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that critique-based refinement produced more domain-grounded improvements, while vote-based refinement better identified and removed irrelevant content.","excerpt":"critique-based refinement produced more domain-grounded improvements, whereas vote-based refinement was more effective at identifying and removing irrelevant content.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors’ reported study concerns financial business briefs, so the evidence here does not establish whether the results generalize to other domains.","excerpt":"We validate SME-C in the domain of financial business briefs","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","relationship":"Escape Meridian interpretation"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T03:50:07.495Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"Would SME-C produce similar results in domains beyond financial business briefs?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI paper pairs finance professionals’ critiques with LLM-driven dataset refinement","summary":"In their paper, Honson Ling, Kidus Admassu and Stephanie Rosenthal present SME-C (Subject Matter Expert Critique), a human-AI workflow for building response datasets and evaluation rubrics. Finance professionals critique candidate responses; LLM-driven analysis then uses written critiques or preference votes to refine the responses and rubrics iteratively. The authors tested the approach on financial business briefs, collecting 3,853 critiques from 411 professionals on 520 queries across two survey rounds. In a blind validation survey with 100 additional professionals, both refinement strategies improved quality over experts’ top-ranked baseline responses, according to the authors. The gains were concentrated among weaker original responses: critique-based refinement produced more domain-grounded improvements, while vote-based refinement was more effective at identifying and removing irrelevant content. The authors say the resulting resources support reproducible offline evaluation and benchmarking, and argue that structured expert critique could build domain-specific evaluation resources more quickly and at lower cost than expert authoring. Escape Meridian interpretation: because the reported study concerns financial business briefs, whether the approach works similarly in other domains remains an open question.","question":"Would SME-C produce similar results in domains beyond financial business briefs?","claims":[{"text":"The authors present SME-C, a workflow combining lightweight expert critiques with LLM-driven analysis and refinement to curate response datasets and evaluation rubrics.","excerpt":"We present SME-C (Subject Matter Expert Critique), a human-AI workflow that captures expertise through lightweight critiques of candidate responses and complements it with LLM-driven analysis and refinement","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The study collected 3,853 critiques from 411 finance professionals on 520 queries across two survey rounds.","excerpt":"collecting 3,853 critiques from 411 finance professionals on 520 queries across two survey rounds","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"In a blind validation survey, both refinement strategies improved quality over the experts’ top-ranked baseline responses.","excerpt":"In a blind validation survey with 100 additional professionals, we found that both strategies significantly improved quality over the experts' top-ranked baseline responses.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that critique-based refinement produced more domain-grounded improvements, while vote-based refinement better identified and removed irrelevant content.","excerpt":"critique-based refinement produced more domain-grounded improvements, whereas vote-based refinement was more effective at identifying and removing irrelevant content.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors’ reported study concerns financial business briefs, so the evidence here does not establish whether the results generalize to other domains.","excerpt":"We validate SME-C in the domain of financial business briefs","support":"interpretation"}],"limitations":["The reported validation concerns financial business briefs; the supplied abstract does not report results from other domains.","The evidence supplied is the paper’s abstract, which summarizes the reported findings but does not provide the full study methods or results."],"mediaId":"ce5c5cdfa947c5855a33b2c089cc56ec07ba3156d26f5ec055ea306df7c8fdea","correctionReason":null,"id":"906c1bee3a770e089ba62e62ab32e10241f81e2fbff0e403ee7964c0a3b190af","publicationId":"09e80d55-1dd1-45e6-85cf-5cb6ae5ef204","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","sourceTitle":"Pairing Expert Critique with LLM-Driven Refinement: An Iterative Approach for Curating Quality AI Evaluation Datasets","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-03","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-05T05:06:26.608Z","createdAt":"2026-11-10T02:47:18.744Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"ce5c5cdfa947c5855a33b2c089cc56ec07ba3156d26f5ec055ea306df7c8fdea","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T02:46:38.879Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T03:50:07.495Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"ce5c5cdfa947c5855a33b2c089cc56ec07ba3156d26f5ec055ea306df7c8fdea","confidence":0.75,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"76e8e423a5e48ee3328910be03eb05a64c3fc351c75fafcbf9bf9ae1803931fc","decidedAt":"2026-11-10T02:46:40.009Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"6c736b5657c76e389013e35f91f2e51f212550d6729f5ee559fe5d61e2f5a66a","observationId":"807ec20a0c0c40ed47c6798b9fd9e56c0ece1e8c8dca42cbf3bed78e3a51e517","retrievedAt":"2026-11-10T02:46:38.707Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"44f4f975-edfb-47eb-86c1-cc86743c25bd"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"62091517-5204-4fd4-85f9-6089394c68d0"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-11-10T02:47:18.744Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Ling, Honson","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Admassu, Kidus","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Rosenthal, Stephanie","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Ling, Honson","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Ling, Honson","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"ac03618509e7ebf641e3872c6334dcb728968aa847ffd02a40513e3b76b5a349:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T03:50:07.495Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"ac03618509e7ebf641e3872c6334dcb728968aa847ffd02a40513e3b76b5a349","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","contentSha256":"d50ee0daf1294394120f05a539ad5883210e7cbac120927d20f21b9d58ce739a","textHash":"6c736b5657c76e389013e35f91f2e51f212550d6729f5ee559fe5d61e2f5a66a","observedAt":"2026-11-10T03:50:07.495Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Admassu, Kidus","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Admassu, Kidus","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"ac03618509e7ebf641e3872c6334dcb728968aa847ffd02a40513e3b76b5a349:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T03:50:07.495Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"ac03618509e7ebf641e3872c6334dcb728968aa847ffd02a40513e3b76b5a349","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","contentSha256":"d50ee0daf1294394120f05a539ad5883210e7cbac120927d20f21b9d58ce739a","textHash":"6c736b5657c76e389013e35f91f2e51f212550d6729f5ee559fe5d61e2f5a66a","observedAt":"2026-11-10T03:50:07.495Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Rosenthal, Stephanie","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Rosenthal, Stephanie","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"ac03618509e7ebf641e3872c6334dcb728968aa847ffd02a40513e3b76b5a349:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T03:50:07.495Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"ac03618509e7ebf641e3872c6334dcb728968aa847ffd02a40513e3b76b5a349","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","contentSha256":"d50ee0daf1294394120f05a539ad5883210e7cbac120927d20f21b9d58ce739a","textHash":"6c736b5657c76e389013e35f91f2e51f212550d6729f5ee559fe5d61e2f5a66a","observedAt":"2026-11-10T03:50:07.495Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":3,"returned":3,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","snapshotId":"ac03618509e7ebf641e3872c6334dcb728968aa847ffd02a40513e3b76b5a349","contentSha256":"d50ee0daf1294394120f05a539ad5883210e7cbac120927d20f21b9d58ce739a","textHash":"6c736b5657c76e389013e35f91f2e51f212550d6729f5ee559fe5d61e2f5a66a","observedAt":"2026-11-10T03:50:07.495Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":43,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/906c1bee3a770e089ba62e62ab32e10241f81e2fbff0e403ee7964c0a3b190af/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-paper-pairs-finance-professionals-critiques-with-906c1bee","formats":{"html":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-paper-pairs-finance-professionals-critiques-with-906c1bee","markdown":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-paper-pairs-finance-professionals-critiques-with-906c1bee.md","json":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-paper-pairs-finance-professionals-critiques-with-906c1bee.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[{"id":"term-llm","name":"Large language model","explanation":"A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#large-language-model"},{"id":"term-benchmark","name":"Benchmark","explanation":"A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.","referenceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09110"}],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"906c1bee3a770e089ba62e62ab32e10241f81e2fbff0e403ee7964c0a3b190af","revision":"09e80d55-1dd1-45e6-85cf-5cb6ae5ef204","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"arXiv cs.AI paper pairs finance professionals’ critiques with LLM-driven dataset refinement","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-paper-pairs-finance-professionals-critiques-with-906c1bee"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","revision":"6c736b5657c76e389013e35f91f2e51f212550d6729f5ee559fe5d61e2f5a66a","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Pairing Expert Critique with LLM-Driven Refinement: An Iterative Approach for Curating Quality AI Evaluation Datasets","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"906c1bee3a770e089ba62e62ab32e10241f81e2fbff0e403ee7964c0a3b190af","title":"arXiv cs.AI paper pairs finance professionals’ critiques with LLM-driven dataset refinement","argument":"In their paper, Honson Ling, Kidus Admassu and Stephanie Rosenthal present SME-C (Subject Matter Expert Critique), a human-AI workflow for building response datasets and evaluation rubrics. Finance professionals critique candidate responses; LLM-driven analysis then uses written critiques or preference votes to refine the responses and rubrics iteratively. The authors tested the approach on financial business briefs, collecting 3,853 critiques from 411 professionals on 520 queries across two survey rounds. In a blind validation survey with 100 additional professionals, both refinement strategies improved quality over experts’ top-ranked baseline responses, according to the authors. The gains were concentrated among weaker original responses: critique-based refinement produced more domain-grounded improvements, while vote-based refinement was more effective at identifying and removing irrelevant content. The authors say the resulting resources support reproducible offline evaluation and benchmarking, and argue that structured expert critique could build domain-specific evaluation resources more quickly and at lower cost than expert authoring. Escape Meridian interpretation: because the reported study concerns financial business briefs, whether the approach works similarly in other domains remains an open question.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The reported validation concerns financial business briefs; the supplied abstract does not report results from other domains. The evidence supplied is the paper’s abstract, which summarizes the reported findings but does not provide the full study methods or results.","speaker":{"name":"Ling, Honson, Admassu, Kidus, Rosenthal, Stephanie","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Pairing Expert Critique with LLM-Driven Refinement: An Iterative Approach for Curating Quality AI Evaluation Datasets","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","publishedAt":"2026-11-03","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors present SME-C, a workflow combining lightweight expert critiques with LLM-driven analysis and refinement to curate response datasets and evaluation rubrics.","excerpt":"We present SME-C (Subject Matter Expert Critique), a human-AI workflow that captures expertise through lightweight critiques of candidate responses and complements it with LLM-driven analysis and refinement","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The study collected 3,853 critiques from 411 finance professionals on 520 queries across two survey rounds.","excerpt":"collecting 3,853 critiques from 411 finance professionals on 520 queries across two survey rounds","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"In a blind validation survey, both refinement strategies improved quality over the experts’ top-ranked baseline responses.","excerpt":"In a blind validation survey with 100 additional professionals, we found that both strategies significantly improved quality over the experts' top-ranked baseline responses.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that critique-based refinement produced more domain-grounded improvements, while vote-based refinement better identified and removed irrelevant content.","excerpt":"critique-based refinement produced more domain-grounded improvements, whereas vote-based refinement was more effective at identifying and removing irrelevant content.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors’ reported study concerns financial business briefs, so the evidence here does not establish whether the results generalize to other domains.","excerpt":"We validate SME-C in the domain of financial business briefs","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","relationship":"Escape Meridian interpretation"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T03:50:07.495Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"Would SME-C produce similar results in domains beyond financial business briefs?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI paper pairs finance professionals’ critiques with LLM-driven dataset refinement","summary":"In their paper, Honson Ling, Kidus Admassu and Stephanie Rosenthal present SME-C (Subject Matter Expert Critique), a human-AI workflow for building response datasets and evaluation rubrics. Finance professionals critique candidate responses; LLM-driven analysis then uses written critiques or preference votes to refine the responses and rubrics iteratively. The authors tested the approach on financial business briefs, collecting 3,853 critiques from 411 professionals on 520 queries across two survey rounds. In a blind validation survey with 100 additional professionals, both refinement strategies improved quality over experts’ top-ranked baseline responses, according to the authors. The gains were concentrated among weaker original responses: critique-based refinement produced more domain-grounded improvements, while vote-based refinement was more effective at identifying and removing irrelevant content. The authors say the resulting resources support reproducible offline evaluation and benchmarking, and argue that structured expert critique could build domain-specific evaluation resources more quickly and at lower cost than expert authoring. Escape Meridian interpretation: because the reported study concerns financial business briefs, whether the approach works similarly in other domains remains an open question.","question":"Would SME-C produce similar results in domains beyond financial business briefs?","claims":[{"text":"The authors present SME-C, a workflow combining lightweight expert critiques with LLM-driven analysis and refinement to curate response datasets and evaluation rubrics.","excerpt":"We present SME-C (Subject Matter Expert Critique), a human-AI workflow that captures expertise through lightweight critiques of candidate responses and complements it with LLM-driven analysis and refinement","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The study collected 3,853 critiques from 411 finance professionals on 520 queries across two survey rounds.","excerpt":"collecting 3,853 critiques from 411 finance professionals on 520 queries across two survey rounds","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"In a blind validation survey, both refinement strategies improved quality over the experts’ top-ranked baseline responses.","excerpt":"In a blind validation survey with 100 additional professionals, we found that both strategies significantly improved quality over the experts' top-ranked baseline responses.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that critique-based refinement produced more domain-grounded improvements, while vote-based refinement better identified and removed irrelevant content.","excerpt":"critique-based refinement produced more domain-grounded improvements, whereas vote-based refinement was more effective at identifying and removing irrelevant content.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors’ reported study concerns financial business briefs, so the evidence here does not establish whether the results generalize to other domains.","excerpt":"We validate SME-C in the domain of financial business briefs","support":"interpretation"}],"limitations":["The reported validation concerns financial business briefs; the supplied abstract does not report results from other domains.","The evidence supplied is the paper’s abstract, which summarizes the reported findings but does not provide the full study methods or results."],"mediaId":"ce5c5cdfa947c5855a33b2c089cc56ec07ba3156d26f5ec055ea306df7c8fdea","correctionReason":null,"id":"906c1bee3a770e089ba62e62ab32e10241f81e2fbff0e403ee7964c0a3b190af","publicationId":"09e80d55-1dd1-45e6-85cf-5cb6ae5ef204","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","sourceTitle":"Pairing Expert Critique with LLM-Driven Refinement: An Iterative Approach for Curating Quality AI Evaluation Datasets","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-03","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-05T05:06:26.608Z","createdAt":"2026-11-10T02:47:18.744Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"ce5c5cdfa947c5855a33b2c089cc56ec07ba3156d26f5ec055ea306df7c8fdea","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T02:46:38.879Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T03:50:07.495Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"ce5c5cdfa947c5855a33b2c089cc56ec07ba3156d26f5ec055ea306df7c8fdea","confidence":0.75,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"76e8e423a5e48ee3328910be03eb05a64c3fc351c75fafcbf9bf9ae1803931fc","decidedAt":"2026-11-10T02:46:40.009Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"6c736b5657c76e389013e35f91f2e51f212550d6729f5ee559fe5d61e2f5a66a","observationId":"807ec20a0c0c40ed47c6798b9fd9e56c0ece1e8c8dca42cbf3bed78e3a51e517","retrievedAt":"2026-11-10T02:46:38.707Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"44f4f975-edfb-47eb-86c1-cc86743c25bd"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"62091517-5204-4fd4-85f9-6089394c68d0"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-11-10T02:47:18.744Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Ling, Honson","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Admassu, Kidus","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Rosenthal, Stephanie","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Ling, Honson","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Ling, Honson","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"ac03618509e7ebf641e3872c6334dcb728968aa847ffd02a40513e3b76b5a349:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T03:50:07.495Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"ac03618509e7ebf641e3872c6334dcb728968aa847ffd02a40513e3b76b5a349","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","contentSha256":"d50ee0daf1294394120f05a539ad5883210e7cbac120927d20f21b9d58ce739a","textHash":"6c736b5657c76e389013e35f91f2e51f212550d6729f5ee559fe5d61e2f5a66a","observedAt":"2026-11-10T03:50:07.495Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Admassu, Kidus","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Admassu, Kidus","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"ac03618509e7ebf641e3872c6334dcb728968aa847ffd02a40513e3b76b5a349:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T03:50:07.495Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"ac03618509e7ebf641e3872c6334dcb728968aa847ffd02a40513e3b76b5a349","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","contentSha256":"d50ee0daf1294394120f05a539ad5883210e7cbac120927d20f21b9d58ce739a","textHash":"6c736b5657c76e389013e35f91f2e51f212550d6729f5ee559fe5d61e2f5a66a","observedAt":"2026-11-10T03:50:07.495Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Rosenthal, Stephanie","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Rosenthal, Stephanie","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"ac03618509e7ebf641e3872c6334dcb728968aa847ffd02a40513e3b76b5a349:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T03:50:07.495Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"ac03618509e7ebf641e3872c6334dcb728968aa847ffd02a40513e3b76b5a349","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","contentSha256":"d50ee0daf1294394120f05a539ad5883210e7cbac120927d20f21b9d58ce739a","textHash":"6c736b5657c76e389013e35f91f2e51f212550d6729f5ee559fe5d61e2f5a66a","observedAt":"2026-11-10T03:50:07.495Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":3,"returned":3,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05749","snapshotId":"ac03618509e7ebf641e3872c6334dcb728968aa847ffd02a40513e3b76b5a349","contentSha256":"d50ee0daf1294394120f05a539ad5883210e7cbac120927d20f21b9d58ce739a","textHash":"6c736b5657c76e389013e35f91f2e51f212550d6729f5ee559fe5d61e2f5a66a","observedAt":"2026-11-10T03:50:07.495Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":43,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/906c1bee3a770e089ba62e62ab32e10241f81e2fbff0e403ee7964c0a3b190af/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"09e80d55-1dd1-45e6-85cf-5cb6ae5ef204","verdict":"passed","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The draft correctly credits the paper to Honson Ling, Kidus Admassu and Stephanie Rosenthal and keeps its findings as the authors' reports. The arXiv page lists cs.HC as the primary category, with cs.AI as a cross-list. The title's 'arXiv cs.AI' therefore matches the feed and is not wrong.","excerpt":"Authors:Honson Ling, Kidus Admassu, Stephanie Rosenthal"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"pass","explanation":"The summary faithfully conveys the SME-C workflow, the study scale, both refinement strategies and the blind validation result. It also reports where the gains were concentrated and the authors' cost and speed argument. It omits the abstract's 'significantly' and 'at scale', which are minor losses of force. The question follows from the single-domain evidence. Terms such as LLM and rubrics are understandable in context.","excerpt":"both strategies significantly improved quality over the experts' top-ranked baseline responses"},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The originalPublished date, 2026-11-03, matches the arXiv v1 submission date. The feed date of 2026-11-05 is later and was correctly not used.","excerpt":"[Submitted on 3 Nov 2026]"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"All source-stated claims match the abstract verbatim. The generalization point is explicitly labeled as an Escape Meridian interpretation and rests on the stated single domain. The cost and speed claim is attributed to the authors as an argument and is not presented as an established fact.","excerpt":"We validate SME-C in the domain of financial business briefs"},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified direct link to the original arXiv abstract page. No better source media was found.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-10T02:47:18.744Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}