{"id":"0f62bad18b42abc99cadbc20f4cb9e9234b567558bd5297a4000802890d6dbe3","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Researchers report bias-related risk downgrades in LLM-assisted HAZOP","argument":"In an arXiv paper, Vinicius M. Müller, Vitor A. O. Silva, Sávio S. V. Vianna and Flávio V. Silva examine cognitive cues in LLM-assisted Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) studies. HAZOP studies safeguard industrial processes against catastrophic accidents. Across 420 trials, the authors report that three frontier LLMs resisted 96.8% of cognitive manipulations, leaving overall susceptibility statistically inconclusive. They say the models rejected confirmation and availability cues, but safety-critical risk downgrades emerged under low anchors and gain frames. The distinction matters: the paper does not describe broad fragility, yet its reported exceptions concern judgments that could reduce perceived hazards in safety-critical work. The authors conclude that automated hazard analysis requires disciplined human-in-the-loop validation. The abstract does not detail the trial setups or establish how the findings extend beyond the tested cases. The paper was submitted to IFAC for possible publication.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract; it does not detail the trial setups or explain how the reported results extend beyond the tested cases. The paper is described as submitted to IFAC for possible publication.","speaker":{"name":"Müller, Vinicius M., Silva, Vitor A. O., Vianna, Sávio S. V., Silva, Flávio V.","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Behavioral Evaluation of Large Language Models Under Cognitive Biases in HAZOP Studies","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","publishedAt":"2026-11-07","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The paper examines whether cognitive cues influence LLMs assisting HAZOP studies.","excerpt":"Whether frontier LLMs withstand cognitive perturbations in safety-critical workflows remains unknown.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Across 420 trials, the authors report that three frontier LLMs resisted most tested cognitive manipulations, while overall susceptibility remained statistically inconclusive.","excerpt":"across 420 trials that three frontier LLMs resisted 96.8% of cognitive manipulations, rendering overall susceptibility statistically inconclusive.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report risk downgrades under low anchors and gain frames, and recommend human-in-the-loop validation.","excerpt":"safety-critical risk downgrades emerged under low anchors and gain frames. Thus, automated hazard analysis requires disciplined human-in-the-loop validation.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T18:52:12.952Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"Which trial conditions produced the reported risk downgrades under low anchors and gain frames?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: Researchers report bias-related risk downgrades in LLM-assisted HAZOP","summary":"In an arXiv paper, Vinicius M. Müller, Vitor A. O. Silva, Sávio S. V. Vianna and Flávio V. Silva examine cognitive cues in LLM-assisted Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) studies. HAZOP studies safeguard industrial processes against catastrophic accidents. Across 420 trials, the authors report that three frontier LLMs resisted 96.8% of cognitive manipulations, leaving overall susceptibility statistically inconclusive. They say the models rejected confirmation and availability cues, but safety-critical risk downgrades emerged under low anchors and gain frames. The distinction matters: the paper does not describe broad fragility, yet its reported exceptions concern judgments that could reduce perceived hazards in safety-critical work. The authors conclude that automated hazard analysis requires disciplined human-in-the-loop validation. The abstract does not detail the trial setups or establish how the findings extend beyond the tested cases. The paper was submitted to IFAC for possible publication.","question":"Which trial conditions produced the reported risk downgrades under low anchors and gain frames?","claims":[{"text":"The paper examines whether cognitive cues influence LLMs assisting HAZOP studies.","excerpt":"Whether frontier LLMs withstand cognitive perturbations in safety-critical workflows remains unknown.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Across 420 trials, the authors report that three frontier LLMs resisted most tested cognitive manipulations, while overall susceptibility remained statistically inconclusive.","excerpt":"across 420 trials that three frontier LLMs resisted 96.8% of cognitive manipulations, rendering overall susceptibility statistically inconclusive.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report risk downgrades under low anchors and gain frames, and recommend human-in-the-loop validation.","excerpt":"safety-critical risk downgrades emerged under low anchors and gain frames. Thus, automated hazard analysis requires disciplined human-in-the-loop validation.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract; it does not detail the trial setups or explain how the reported results extend beyond the tested cases.","The paper is described as submitted to IFAC for possible publication."],"mediaId":"4df2d288814f1acf3ea7593671517331b7b417dc7b94bb277594ba7eafb6972a","correctionReason":null,"id":"0f62bad18b42abc99cadbc20f4cb9e9234b567558bd5297a4000802890d6dbe3","publicationId":"65ad0ae1-c2cd-479d-83ff-ce6751b5ae72","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","sourceTitle":"Behavioral Evaluation of Large Language Models Under Cognitive Biases in HAZOP Studies","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-07","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-10T08:36:48.690Z","createdAt":"2026-11-10T17:49:59.942Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"4df2d288814f1acf3ea7593671517331b7b417dc7b94bb277594ba7eafb6972a","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T17:49:04.869Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T18:52:12.952Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"4df2d288814f1acf3ea7593671517331b7b417dc7b94bb277594ba7eafb6972a","confidence":0.7200000000000001,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"068f3693646829252c271385eb8ba1be3f01fcf63ff90ab035bdaa08dd51be75","decidedAt":"2026-11-10T17:49:05.380Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"9621a325aff9ea3b25be39505d63792e49d7ee1bd8aeb7ead86043e4e08e6c9c","observationId":"659d1fc95f7e3bde301206d84ac6a924b3ea0a6fc4ab4ff2adcd09a0a42607b4","retrievedAt":"2026-11-10T17:49:04.806Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"5b519829-6875-4358-809f-7a425873e6d0"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"ed485451-63ec-4900-8df8-ea1e3636bd79"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-10T17:49:59.942Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Müller, Vinicius M.","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Silva, Vitor A. O.","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Vianna, Sávio S. V.","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Silva, Flávio V.","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Müller, Vinicius M.","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Müller, Vinicius M.","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"576c61cfa8224804032baefae3e44593de12f64c59732dc566090f0abeba87ab:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T18:52:12.952Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"576c61cfa8224804032baefae3e44593de12f64c59732dc566090f0abeba87ab","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","contentSha256":"96f991948ac7ddd28515d86beffdb0e4d718947b4a1f75ba096d4a1dbf44b762","textHash":"9621a325aff9ea3b25be39505d63792e49d7ee1bd8aeb7ead86043e4e08e6c9c","observedAt":"2026-11-10T18:52:12.952Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Silva, Vitor A. O.","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Silva, Vitor A. O.","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"576c61cfa8224804032baefae3e44593de12f64c59732dc566090f0abeba87ab:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T18:52:12.952Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"576c61cfa8224804032baefae3e44593de12f64c59732dc566090f0abeba87ab","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","contentSha256":"96f991948ac7ddd28515d86beffdb0e4d718947b4a1f75ba096d4a1dbf44b762","textHash":"9621a325aff9ea3b25be39505d63792e49d7ee1bd8aeb7ead86043e4e08e6c9c","observedAt":"2026-11-10T18:52:12.952Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Vianna, Sávio S. V.","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Vianna, Sávio S. V.","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"576c61cfa8224804032baefae3e44593de12f64c59732dc566090f0abeba87ab:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T18:52:12.952Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"576c61cfa8224804032baefae3e44593de12f64c59732dc566090f0abeba87ab","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","contentSha256":"96f991948ac7ddd28515d86beffdb0e4d718947b4a1f75ba096d4a1dbf44b762","textHash":"9621a325aff9ea3b25be39505d63792e49d7ee1bd8aeb7ead86043e4e08e6c9c","observedAt":"2026-11-10T18:52:12.952Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Silva, Flávio V.","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Silva, Flávio V.","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"576c61cfa8224804032baefae3e44593de12f64c59732dc566090f0abeba87ab:participation:3","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T18:52:12.952Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"576c61cfa8224804032baefae3e44593de12f64c59732dc566090f0abeba87ab","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","contentSha256":"96f991948ac7ddd28515d86beffdb0e4d718947b4a1f75ba096d4a1dbf44b762","textHash":"9621a325aff9ea3b25be39505d63792e49d7ee1bd8aeb7ead86043e4e08e6c9c","observedAt":"2026-11-10T18:52:12.952Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":4,"returned":4,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","snapshotId":"576c61cfa8224804032baefae3e44593de12f64c59732dc566090f0abeba87ab","contentSha256":"96f991948ac7ddd28515d86beffdb0e4d718947b4a1f75ba096d4a1dbf44b762","textHash":"9621a325aff9ea3b25be39505d63792e49d7ee1bd8aeb7ead86043e4e08e6c9c","observedAt":"2026-11-10T18:52:12.952Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":43,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/0f62bad18b42abc99cadbc20f4cb9e9234b567558bd5297a4000802890d6dbe3/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-researchers-report-bias-related-risk-downgrades-in-0f62bad1","formats":{"html":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-researchers-report-bias-related-risk-downgrades-in-0f62bad1","markdown":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-researchers-report-bias-related-risk-downgrades-in-0f62bad1.md","json":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-researchers-report-bias-related-risk-downgrades-in-0f62bad1.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[{"id":"term-llm","name":"Large language model","explanation":"A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#large-language-model"}],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"0f62bad18b42abc99cadbc20f4cb9e9234b567558bd5297a4000802890d6dbe3","revision":"65ad0ae1-c2cd-479d-83ff-ce6751b5ae72","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Researchers report bias-related risk downgrades in LLM-assisted HAZOP","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-researchers-report-bias-related-risk-downgrades-in-0f62bad1"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","revision":"9621a325aff9ea3b25be39505d63792e49d7ee1bd8aeb7ead86043e4e08e6c9c","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Behavioral Evaluation of Large Language Models Under Cognitive Biases in HAZOP Studies","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721"},"status":"partial","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"0f62bad18b42abc99cadbc20f4cb9e9234b567558bd5297a4000802890d6dbe3","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Researchers report bias-related risk downgrades in LLM-assisted HAZOP","argument":"In an arXiv paper, Vinicius M. Müller, Vitor A. O. Silva, Sávio S. V. Vianna and Flávio V. Silva examine cognitive cues in LLM-assisted Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) studies. HAZOP studies safeguard industrial processes against catastrophic accidents. Across 420 trials, the authors report that three frontier LLMs resisted 96.8% of cognitive manipulations, leaving overall susceptibility statistically inconclusive. They say the models rejected confirmation and availability cues, but safety-critical risk downgrades emerged under low anchors and gain frames. The distinction matters: the paper does not describe broad fragility, yet its reported exceptions concern judgments that could reduce perceived hazards in safety-critical work. The authors conclude that automated hazard analysis requires disciplined human-in-the-loop validation. The abstract does not detail the trial setups or establish how the findings extend beyond the tested cases. The paper was submitted to IFAC for possible publication.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract; it does not detail the trial setups or explain how the reported results extend beyond the tested cases. The paper is described as submitted to IFAC for possible publication.","speaker":{"name":"Müller, Vinicius M., Silva, Vitor A. O., Vianna, Sávio S. V., Silva, Flávio V.","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Behavioral Evaluation of Large Language Models Under Cognitive Biases in HAZOP Studies","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","publishedAt":"2026-11-07","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The paper examines whether cognitive cues influence LLMs assisting HAZOP studies.","excerpt":"Whether frontier LLMs withstand cognitive perturbations in safety-critical workflows remains unknown.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Across 420 trials, the authors report that three frontier LLMs resisted most tested cognitive manipulations, while overall susceptibility remained statistically inconclusive.","excerpt":"across 420 trials that three frontier LLMs resisted 96.8% of cognitive manipulations, rendering overall susceptibility statistically inconclusive.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report risk downgrades under low anchors and gain frames, and recommend human-in-the-loop validation.","excerpt":"safety-critical risk downgrades emerged under low anchors and gain frames. Thus, automated hazard analysis requires disciplined human-in-the-loop validation.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T18:52:12.952Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"Which trial conditions produced the reported risk downgrades under low anchors and gain frames?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: Researchers report bias-related risk downgrades in LLM-assisted HAZOP","summary":"In an arXiv paper, Vinicius M. Müller, Vitor A. O. Silva, Sávio S. V. Vianna and Flávio V. Silva examine cognitive cues in LLM-assisted Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) studies. HAZOP studies safeguard industrial processes against catastrophic accidents. Across 420 trials, the authors report that three frontier LLMs resisted 96.8% of cognitive manipulations, leaving overall susceptibility statistically inconclusive. They say the models rejected confirmation and availability cues, but safety-critical risk downgrades emerged under low anchors and gain frames. The distinction matters: the paper does not describe broad fragility, yet its reported exceptions concern judgments that could reduce perceived hazards in safety-critical work. The authors conclude that automated hazard analysis requires disciplined human-in-the-loop validation. The abstract does not detail the trial setups or establish how the findings extend beyond the tested cases. The paper was submitted to IFAC for possible publication.","question":"Which trial conditions produced the reported risk downgrades under low anchors and gain frames?","claims":[{"text":"The paper examines whether cognitive cues influence LLMs assisting HAZOP studies.","excerpt":"Whether frontier LLMs withstand cognitive perturbations in safety-critical workflows remains unknown.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Across 420 trials, the authors report that three frontier LLMs resisted most tested cognitive manipulations, while overall susceptibility remained statistically inconclusive.","excerpt":"across 420 trials that three frontier LLMs resisted 96.8% of cognitive manipulations, rendering overall susceptibility statistically inconclusive.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report risk downgrades under low anchors and gain frames, and recommend human-in-the-loop validation.","excerpt":"safety-critical risk downgrades emerged under low anchors and gain frames. Thus, automated hazard analysis requires disciplined human-in-the-loop validation.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract; it does not detail the trial setups or explain how the reported results extend beyond the tested cases.","The paper is described as submitted to IFAC for possible publication."],"mediaId":"4df2d288814f1acf3ea7593671517331b7b417dc7b94bb277594ba7eafb6972a","correctionReason":null,"id":"0f62bad18b42abc99cadbc20f4cb9e9234b567558bd5297a4000802890d6dbe3","publicationId":"65ad0ae1-c2cd-479d-83ff-ce6751b5ae72","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","sourceTitle":"Behavioral Evaluation of Large Language Models Under Cognitive Biases in HAZOP Studies","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-07","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-10T08:36:48.690Z","createdAt":"2026-11-10T17:49:59.942Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"4df2d288814f1acf3ea7593671517331b7b417dc7b94bb277594ba7eafb6972a","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T17:49:04.869Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T18:52:12.952Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"4df2d288814f1acf3ea7593671517331b7b417dc7b94bb277594ba7eafb6972a","confidence":0.7200000000000001,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"068f3693646829252c271385eb8ba1be3f01fcf63ff90ab035bdaa08dd51be75","decidedAt":"2026-11-10T17:49:05.380Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"9621a325aff9ea3b25be39505d63792e49d7ee1bd8aeb7ead86043e4e08e6c9c","observationId":"659d1fc95f7e3bde301206d84ac6a924b3ea0a6fc4ab4ff2adcd09a0a42607b4","retrievedAt":"2026-11-10T17:49:04.806Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"5b519829-6875-4358-809f-7a425873e6d0"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"ed485451-63ec-4900-8df8-ea1e3636bd79"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-10T17:49:59.942Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Müller, Vinicius M.","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Silva, Vitor A. O.","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Vianna, Sávio S. V.","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Silva, Flávio V.","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Müller, Vinicius M.","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Müller, Vinicius M.","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"576c61cfa8224804032baefae3e44593de12f64c59732dc566090f0abeba87ab:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T18:52:12.952Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"576c61cfa8224804032baefae3e44593de12f64c59732dc566090f0abeba87ab","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","contentSha256":"96f991948ac7ddd28515d86beffdb0e4d718947b4a1f75ba096d4a1dbf44b762","textHash":"9621a325aff9ea3b25be39505d63792e49d7ee1bd8aeb7ead86043e4e08e6c9c","observedAt":"2026-11-10T18:52:12.952Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Silva, Vitor A. O.","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Silva, Vitor A. O.","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"576c61cfa8224804032baefae3e44593de12f64c59732dc566090f0abeba87ab:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T18:52:12.952Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"576c61cfa8224804032baefae3e44593de12f64c59732dc566090f0abeba87ab","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","contentSha256":"96f991948ac7ddd28515d86beffdb0e4d718947b4a1f75ba096d4a1dbf44b762","textHash":"9621a325aff9ea3b25be39505d63792e49d7ee1bd8aeb7ead86043e4e08e6c9c","observedAt":"2026-11-10T18:52:12.952Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Vianna, Sávio S. V.","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Vianna, Sávio S. V.","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"576c61cfa8224804032baefae3e44593de12f64c59732dc566090f0abeba87ab:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T18:52:12.952Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"576c61cfa8224804032baefae3e44593de12f64c59732dc566090f0abeba87ab","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","contentSha256":"96f991948ac7ddd28515d86beffdb0e4d718947b4a1f75ba096d4a1dbf44b762","textHash":"9621a325aff9ea3b25be39505d63792e49d7ee1bd8aeb7ead86043e4e08e6c9c","observedAt":"2026-11-10T18:52:12.952Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Silva, Flávio V.","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Silva, Flávio V.","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"576c61cfa8224804032baefae3e44593de12f64c59732dc566090f0abeba87ab:participation:3","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T18:52:12.952Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"576c61cfa8224804032baefae3e44593de12f64c59732dc566090f0abeba87ab","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","contentSha256":"96f991948ac7ddd28515d86beffdb0e4d718947b4a1f75ba096d4a1dbf44b762","textHash":"9621a325aff9ea3b25be39505d63792e49d7ee1bd8aeb7ead86043e4e08e6c9c","observedAt":"2026-11-10T18:52:12.952Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":4,"returned":4,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10721","snapshotId":"576c61cfa8224804032baefae3e44593de12f64c59732dc566090f0abeba87ab","contentSha256":"96f991948ac7ddd28515d86beffdb0e4d718947b4a1f75ba096d4a1dbf44b762","textHash":"9621a325aff9ea3b25be39505d63792e49d7ee1bd8aeb7ead86043e4e08e6c9c","observedAt":"2026-11-10T18:52:12.952Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":43,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/0f62bad18b42abc99cadbc20f4cb9e9234b567558bd5297a4000802890d6dbe3/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"65ad0ae1-c2cd-479d-83ff-ce6751b5ae72","verdict":"uncertain","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The draft correctly attributes the paper to Vinicius M. Müller, Vitor A. O. Silva, Sávio S. V. Vianna and Flávio V. Silva on arXiv. It keeps the findings and the human-in-the-loop conclusion framed as the authors' reports.","excerpt":"Authors:Vinicius M. Müller, Vitor A. O. Silva, Sávio S. V. Vianna, Flávio V. Silva"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"uncertain","explanation":"The reading is faithful. However, the central finding depends on unexplained terms: 'low anchors', 'gain frames' and 'confirmation and availability cues'. A non-specialist cannot tell what kind of prompt produced the risk downgrades. Smallest repair: keep the exact terms but add term-library tooltips or a brief plain gloss. For example, an anchor is an initial reference value that pulls a judgment toward it, and a gain frame presents an outcome in terms of what is gained. 'Frontier LLMs' and 'human-in-the-loop' would also benefit from tooltips. The title, question and the conditional significance sentence are otherwise sound.","excerpt":"safety-critical risk downgrades emerged under low anchors and gain frames"},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The displayed originalPublished date of 2026-11-07 matches the v1 submission date. The feed date of Nov 10 is correctly not used.","excerpt":"[Submitted on 7 Nov 2026]"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"The claims about 420 trials, the 96.8% resistance rate, the inconclusive overall susceptibility, the rejected confirmation and availability cues, the downgrades under low anchors and gain frames, and the IFAC submission are all source-stated. The interpretive sentence is hedged with 'could' and follows from the term 'risk downgrades'. The limitations correctly note that the evidence is the abstract only.","excerpt":"Contrary to assumed broad fragility, models rejected confirmation and availability cues."},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper, which is the most direct access to the source.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-10T17:49:59.942Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}