{"id":"4898bdae660d89e93fa30a4f2748590b6e678ed3e80977ecdef227d072ed1149","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Verification-Guided Retrosynthesis: Reaction Feedback and Evidence Timing","argument":"In “Verification-Guided Retrosynthesis: Reaction Feedback and Evidence Timing,” Hongxuan Shi and Hankz Hankui Zhuo introduce Verification-Guided Reflow (VGR), which brings reaction verification into AND/OR search for retrosynthesis. Retrosynthesis seeks routes for making a target molecule from purchasable starting materials. The authors argue that checking routes only after search ends cannot correct mistakes made during the search. VGR uses binary verification verdicts to exclude reactions or change their search priority. On Retro190, feeding verification results into search raised verified solvability—the fraction of targets with a complete route accepted stepwise by the verifier—from 51.1% to 62.6%, compared with route evaluation without feedback. The authors also report that earlier verification and immediate prioritization each improved route discovery, but combining them performed worse than either change alone. Their proposed strategy prunes rejected reactions immediately and gives accepted reactions higher priority when they form part of a complete candidate route. In a separate comparison with verification scheduling held fixed, this strategy raised verified solvability from 61.1% to 71.1%, using fewer proposal calls and unique verifier queries. These results concern the paper’s experiments; the abstract does not establish how well the strategy generalizes beyond them.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The supplied evidence is the abstract, not the paper’s full experimental details; it does not explain why combining earlier verification and immediate prioritization performed worse. The reported results are from Retro190 and a separate comparison with verification scheduling fixed; the abstract does not establish generalization beyond these experiments.","speaker":{"name":"Shi, Hongxuan, Zhuo, Hankz Hankui","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Verification-Guided Retrosynthesis: Reaction Feedback and Evidence Timing","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","publishedAt":"2026-10-28","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors introduce VGR, which makes reaction verification part of AND/OR search and uses verdicts to exclude reactions or change their priority.","excerpt":"We introduce Verification-Guided Reflow (VGR), incorporating reaction verification as a decision action in AND/OR search.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"On Retro190, feeding verification results into search increased verified solvability from 51.1% to 62.6% compared with route evaluation without feedback.","excerpt":"On Retro190, feeding verification results into search increases verified solvability from 51.1% to 62.6% relative to route evaluation without feedback.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that earlier verification and immediate prioritization each improve route discovery, but combining them performs worse than either change alone.","excerpt":"earlier verification and immediate prioritization of accepted reactions each improve route discovery, yet combining them performs worse than either change alone.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"With verification scheduling fixed, the authors’ early-pruning, delayed-guidance strategy raises verified solvability from 61.1% to 71.1% and uses fewer proposal calls and unique verifier queries.","excerpt":"this strategy increases verified solvability from 61.1% with immediate guidance to 71.1%, using fewer proposal calls and unique verifier queries.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","checkedAt":"2026-11-11T10:56:08.572Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"What explains why combining earlier verification with immediate prioritization performed worse than either change alone?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: Verification-Guided Retrosynthesis: Reaction Feedback and Evidence Timing","summary":"In “Verification-Guided Retrosynthesis: Reaction Feedback and Evidence Timing,” Hongxuan Shi and Hankz Hankui Zhuo introduce Verification-Guided Reflow (VGR), which brings reaction verification into AND/OR search for retrosynthesis. Retrosynthesis seeks routes for making a target molecule from purchasable starting materials. The authors argue that checking routes only after search ends cannot correct mistakes made during the search. VGR uses binary verification verdicts to exclude reactions or change their search priority. On Retro190, feeding verification results into search raised verified solvability—the fraction of targets with a complete route accepted stepwise by the verifier—from 51.1% to 62.6%, compared with route evaluation without feedback. The authors also report that earlier verification and immediate prioritization each improved route discovery, but combining them performed worse than either change alone. Their proposed strategy prunes rejected reactions immediately and gives accepted reactions higher priority when they form part of a complete candidate route. In a separate comparison with verification scheduling held fixed, this strategy raised verified solvability from 61.1% to 71.1%, using fewer proposal calls and unique verifier queries. These results concern the paper’s experiments; the abstract does not establish how well the strategy generalizes beyond them.","question":"What explains why combining earlier verification with immediate prioritization performed worse than either change alone?","claims":[{"text":"The authors introduce VGR, which makes reaction verification part of AND/OR search and uses verdicts to exclude reactions or change their priority.","excerpt":"We introduce Verification-Guided Reflow (VGR), incorporating reaction verification as a decision action in AND/OR search.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"On Retro190, feeding verification results into search increased verified solvability from 51.1% to 62.6% compared with route evaluation without feedback.","excerpt":"On Retro190, feeding verification results into search increases verified solvability from 51.1% to 62.6% relative to route evaluation without feedback.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that earlier verification and immediate prioritization each improve route discovery, but combining them performs worse than either change alone.","excerpt":"earlier verification and immediate prioritization of accepted reactions each improve route discovery, yet combining them performs worse than either change alone.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"With verification scheduling fixed, the authors’ early-pruning, delayed-guidance strategy raises verified solvability from 61.1% to 71.1% and uses fewer proposal calls and unique verifier queries.","excerpt":"this strategy increases verified solvability from 61.1% with immediate guidance to 71.1%, using fewer proposal calls and unique verifier queries.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The supplied evidence is the abstract, not the paper’s full experimental details; it does not explain why combining earlier verification and immediate prioritization performed worse.","The reported results are from Retro190 and a separate comparison with verification scheduling fixed; the abstract does not establish generalization beyond these experiments."],"mediaId":"f82ba9e0cf3ec50e39c29493cb27b7833ff2f84153ba883316e1a1e24cf757b6","correctionReason":null,"id":"4898bdae660d89e93fa30a4f2748590b6e678ed3e80977ecdef227d072ed1149","publicationId":"3c1e9220-e2be-4018-8c2f-68ee3f593cb4","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","sourceTitle":"Verification-Guided Retrosynthesis: Reaction Feedback and Evidence Timing","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-28","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-30T06:42:46.469Z","createdAt":"2026-11-11T09:53:03.858Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"f82ba9e0cf3ec50e39c29493cb27b7833ff2f84153ba883316e1a1e24cf757b6","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-10-31T06:01:49.775Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","checkedAt":"2026-11-11T10:56:08.572Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"f82ba9e0cf3ec50e39c29493cb27b7833ff2f84153ba883316e1a1e24cf757b6","confidence":0.6900000000000001,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"0640c925da687d6b0bdecb5aa03e5342a144ab5dd38aca22052697c1ccd2e9fa","decidedAt":"2026-10-31T06:01:51.073Z","redecided":{"from":"stream-admission-v5","under":"stream-admission-v5+confidence-0.5"}},"provenance":{"textHash":"f1b34c50edf988a6d8069bee7cadd03d0bd82b9cfa99978cf2ef1eeb9156ac35","observationId":"5888c046a14f6abdec8a3a6ea8aa659f0efa7a8833f5cdf9093d445255eb725b","retrievedAt":"2026-10-31T06:01:49.676Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"3cd7013f-70e4-408b-8fbf-90d06bd41485"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"041b04b5-c959-48f2-8900-534f1b055a79"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-11-11T09:53:03.858Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Shi, Hongxuan","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Zhuo, Hankz Hankui","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Shi, Hongxuan","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Shi, Hongxuan","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"115d5da1256d3cece6da55e84185ba6a0d93b51729f97018459716f5cfc50cc7:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-11T10:56:08.572Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"115d5da1256d3cece6da55e84185ba6a0d93b51729f97018459716f5cfc50cc7","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","contentSha256":"ee1109c854b3252b31c0349e989aae0a665ab4cccc84bcebb18e2452fb2e7bc6","textHash":"f1b34c50edf988a6d8069bee7cadd03d0bd82b9cfa99978cf2ef1eeb9156ac35","observedAt":"2026-11-11T10:56:08.572Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Zhuo, Hankz Hankui","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Zhuo, Hankz Hankui","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"115d5da1256d3cece6da55e84185ba6a0d93b51729f97018459716f5cfc50cc7:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-11T10:56:08.572Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"115d5da1256d3cece6da55e84185ba6a0d93b51729f97018459716f5cfc50cc7","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","contentSha256":"ee1109c854b3252b31c0349e989aae0a665ab4cccc84bcebb18e2452fb2e7bc6","textHash":"f1b34c50edf988a6d8069bee7cadd03d0bd82b9cfa99978cf2ef1eeb9156ac35","observedAt":"2026-11-11T10:56:08.572Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":2,"returned":2,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","snapshotId":"115d5da1256d3cece6da55e84185ba6a0d93b51729f97018459716f5cfc50cc7","contentSha256":"ee1109c854b3252b31c0349e989aae0a665ab4cccc84bcebb18e2452fb2e7bc6","textHash":"f1b34c50edf988a6d8069bee7cadd03d0bd82b9cfa99978cf2ef1eeb9156ac35","observedAt":"2026-11-11T10:56:08.572Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":40,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/4898bdae660d89e93fa30a4f2748590b6e678ed3e80977ecdef227d072ed1149/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-verification-guided-retrosynthesis-reaction-4898bdae","formats":{"html":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-verification-guided-retrosynthesis-reaction-4898bdae","markdown":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-verification-guided-retrosynthesis-reaction-4898bdae.md","json":"/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-verification-guided-retrosynthesis-reaction-4898bdae.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"4898bdae660d89e93fa30a4f2748590b6e678ed3e80977ecdef227d072ed1149","revision":"3c1e9220-e2be-4018-8c2f-68ee3f593cb4","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Verification-Guided Retrosynthesis: Reaction Feedback and Evidence Timing","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-verification-guided-retrosynthesis-reaction-4898bdae"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","revision":"f1b34c50edf988a6d8069bee7cadd03d0bd82b9cfa99978cf2ef1eeb9156ac35","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Verification-Guided Retrosynthesis: Reaction Feedback and Evidence Timing","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"4898bdae660d89e93fa30a4f2748590b6e678ed3e80977ecdef227d072ed1149","title":"arXiv cs.AI: Verification-Guided Retrosynthesis: Reaction Feedback and Evidence Timing","argument":"In “Verification-Guided Retrosynthesis: Reaction Feedback and Evidence Timing,” Hongxuan Shi and Hankz Hankui Zhuo introduce Verification-Guided Reflow (VGR), which brings reaction verification into AND/OR search for retrosynthesis. Retrosynthesis seeks routes for making a target molecule from purchasable starting materials. The authors argue that checking routes only after search ends cannot correct mistakes made during the search. VGR uses binary verification verdicts to exclude reactions or change their search priority. On Retro190, feeding verification results into search raised verified solvability—the fraction of targets with a complete route accepted stepwise by the verifier—from 51.1% to 62.6%, compared with route evaluation without feedback. The authors also report that earlier verification and immediate prioritization each improved route discovery, but combining them performed worse than either change alone. Their proposed strategy prunes rejected reactions immediately and gives accepted reactions higher priority when they form part of a complete candidate route. In a separate comparison with verification scheduling held fixed, this strategy raised verified solvability from 61.1% to 71.1%, using fewer proposal calls and unique verifier queries. These results concern the paper’s experiments; the abstract does not establish how well the strategy generalizes beyond them.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The supplied evidence is the abstract, not the paper’s full experimental details; it does not explain why combining earlier verification and immediate prioritization performed worse. The reported results are from Retro190 and a separate comparison with verification scheduling fixed; the abstract does not establish generalization beyond these experiments.","speaker":{"name":"Shi, Hongxuan, Zhuo, Hankz Hankui","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Verification-Guided Retrosynthesis: Reaction Feedback and Evidence Timing","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","publishedAt":"2026-10-28","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors introduce VGR, which makes reaction verification part of AND/OR search and uses verdicts to exclude reactions or change their priority.","excerpt":"We introduce Verification-Guided Reflow (VGR), incorporating reaction verification as a decision action in AND/OR search.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"On Retro190, feeding verification results into search increased verified solvability from 51.1% to 62.6% compared with route evaluation without feedback.","excerpt":"On Retro190, feeding verification results into search increases verified solvability from 51.1% to 62.6% relative to route evaluation without feedback.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that earlier verification and immediate prioritization each improve route discovery, but combining them performs worse than either change alone.","excerpt":"earlier verification and immediate prioritization of accepted reactions each improve route discovery, yet combining them performs worse than either change alone.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"With verification scheduling fixed, the authors’ early-pruning, delayed-guidance strategy raises verified solvability from 61.1% to 71.1% and uses fewer proposal calls and unique verifier queries.","excerpt":"this strategy increases verified solvability from 61.1% with immediate guidance to 71.1%, using fewer proposal calls and unique verifier queries.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","checkedAt":"2026-11-11T10:56:08.572Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"What explains why combining earlier verification with immediate prioritization performed worse than either change alone?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv cs.AI: Verification-Guided Retrosynthesis: Reaction Feedback and Evidence Timing","summary":"In “Verification-Guided Retrosynthesis: Reaction Feedback and Evidence Timing,” Hongxuan Shi and Hankz Hankui Zhuo introduce Verification-Guided Reflow (VGR), which brings reaction verification into AND/OR search for retrosynthesis. Retrosynthesis seeks routes for making a target molecule from purchasable starting materials. The authors argue that checking routes only after search ends cannot correct mistakes made during the search. VGR uses binary verification verdicts to exclude reactions or change their search priority. On Retro190, feeding verification results into search raised verified solvability—the fraction of targets with a complete route accepted stepwise by the verifier—from 51.1% to 62.6%, compared with route evaluation without feedback. The authors also report that earlier verification and immediate prioritization each improved route discovery, but combining them performed worse than either change alone. Their proposed strategy prunes rejected reactions immediately and gives accepted reactions higher priority when they form part of a complete candidate route. In a separate comparison with verification scheduling held fixed, this strategy raised verified solvability from 61.1% to 71.1%, using fewer proposal calls and unique verifier queries. These results concern the paper’s experiments; the abstract does not establish how well the strategy generalizes beyond them.","question":"What explains why combining earlier verification with immediate prioritization performed worse than either change alone?","claims":[{"text":"The authors introduce VGR, which makes reaction verification part of AND/OR search and uses verdicts to exclude reactions or change their priority.","excerpt":"We introduce Verification-Guided Reflow (VGR), incorporating reaction verification as a decision action in AND/OR search.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"On Retro190, feeding verification results into search increased verified solvability from 51.1% to 62.6% compared with route evaluation without feedback.","excerpt":"On Retro190, feeding verification results into search increases verified solvability from 51.1% to 62.6% relative to route evaluation without feedback.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that earlier verification and immediate prioritization each improve route discovery, but combining them performs worse than either change alone.","excerpt":"earlier verification and immediate prioritization of accepted reactions each improve route discovery, yet combining them performs worse than either change alone.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"With verification scheduling fixed, the authors’ early-pruning, delayed-guidance strategy raises verified solvability from 61.1% to 71.1% and uses fewer proposal calls and unique verifier queries.","excerpt":"this strategy increases verified solvability from 61.1% with immediate guidance to 71.1%, using fewer proposal calls and unique verifier queries.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The supplied evidence is the abstract, not the paper’s full experimental details; it does not explain why combining earlier verification and immediate prioritization performed worse.","The reported results are from Retro190 and a separate comparison with verification scheduling fixed; the abstract does not establish generalization beyond these experiments."],"mediaId":"f82ba9e0cf3ec50e39c29493cb27b7833ff2f84153ba883316e1a1e24cf757b6","correctionReason":null,"id":"4898bdae660d89e93fa30a4f2748590b6e678ed3e80977ecdef227d072ed1149","publicationId":"3c1e9220-e2be-4018-8c2f-68ee3f593cb4","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","sourceTitle":"Verification-Guided Retrosynthesis: Reaction Feedback and Evidence Timing","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-28","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-30T06:42:46.469Z","createdAt":"2026-11-11T09:53:03.858Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"f82ba9e0cf3ec50e39c29493cb27b7833ff2f84153ba883316e1a1e24cf757b6","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-10-31T06:01:49.775Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","checkedAt":"2026-11-11T10:56:08.572Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"f82ba9e0cf3ec50e39c29493cb27b7833ff2f84153ba883316e1a1e24cf757b6","confidence":0.6900000000000001,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"0640c925da687d6b0bdecb5aa03e5342a144ab5dd38aca22052697c1ccd2e9fa","decidedAt":"2026-10-31T06:01:51.073Z","redecided":{"from":"stream-admission-v5","under":"stream-admission-v5+confidence-0.5"}},"provenance":{"textHash":"f1b34c50edf988a6d8069bee7cadd03d0bd82b9cfa99978cf2ef1eeb9156ac35","observationId":"5888c046a14f6abdec8a3a6ea8aa659f0efa7a8833f5cdf9093d445255eb725b","retrievedAt":"2026-10-31T06:01:49.676Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"3cd7013f-70e4-408b-8fbf-90d06bd41485"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"041b04b5-c959-48f2-8900-534f1b055a79"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-11-11T09:53:03.858Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Shi, Hongxuan","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Zhuo, Hankz Hankui","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Shi, Hongxuan","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Shi, Hongxuan","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"115d5da1256d3cece6da55e84185ba6a0d93b51729f97018459716f5cfc50cc7:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-11T10:56:08.572Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"115d5da1256d3cece6da55e84185ba6a0d93b51729f97018459716f5cfc50cc7","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","contentSha256":"ee1109c854b3252b31c0349e989aae0a665ab4cccc84bcebb18e2452fb2e7bc6","textHash":"f1b34c50edf988a6d8069bee7cadd03d0bd82b9cfa99978cf2ef1eeb9156ac35","observedAt":"2026-11-11T10:56:08.572Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Zhuo, Hankz Hankui","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Zhuo, Hankz Hankui","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"115d5da1256d3cece6da55e84185ba6a0d93b51729f97018459716f5cfc50cc7:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-11T10:56:08.572Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"115d5da1256d3cece6da55e84185ba6a0d93b51729f97018459716f5cfc50cc7","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","contentSha256":"ee1109c854b3252b31c0349e989aae0a665ab4cccc84bcebb18e2452fb2e7bc6","textHash":"f1b34c50edf988a6d8069bee7cadd03d0bd82b9cfa99978cf2ef1eeb9156ac35","observedAt":"2026-11-11T10:56:08.572Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":2,"returned":2,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38245","snapshotId":"115d5da1256d3cece6da55e84185ba6a0d93b51729f97018459716f5cfc50cc7","contentSha256":"ee1109c854b3252b31c0349e989aae0a665ab4cccc84bcebb18e2452fb2e7bc6","textHash":"f1b34c50edf988a6d8069bee7cadd03d0bd82b9cfa99978cf2ef1eeb9156ac35","observedAt":"2026-11-11T10:56:08.572Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":40,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/4898bdae660d89e93fa30a4f2748590b6e678ed3e80977ecdef227d072ed1149/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"3c1e9220-e2be-4018-8c2f-68ee3f593cb4","verdict":"passed","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The draft correctly credits the paper to Hongxuan Shi and Hankz Hankui Zhuo on arXiv cs.AI. It frames VGR and the results as the authors' own reported work rather than established fact.","excerpt":"Authors:Hongxuan Shi, Hankz Hankui Zhuo"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"pass","explanation":"The summary leads with the actors and the method, and explains retrosynthesis and verified solvability in plain terms. It preserves the counterintuitive finding about the combined changes and appropriately limits generalization. Terms such as AND/OR search, Retro190 and proposal calls are kept exact and are suited to tooltips. Optional repair: name the 61.1% baseline as immediate guidance, as the source does. The question follows directly from an unresolved finding.","excerpt":"this strategy increases verified solvability from 61.1% with immediate guidance to 71.1%"},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The originalPublished date of 2026-10-28 matches the v1 submission date on arXiv. The later feed date of Oct 31 was correctly not used.","excerpt":"[Submitted on 28 Oct 2026]"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"All four claims and the figures (51.1% to 62.6%, 61.1% to 71.1%, and fewer calls and queries) match the abstract verbatim. The limitations accurately note that the abstract gives no explanation for the negative interaction and does not establish generalization. No benefits or costs are invented.","excerpt":"On Retro190, feeding verification results into search increases verified solvability from 51.1% to 62.6% relative to route evaluation without feedback."},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper. It is the most direct access to the source, and no other media was found.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-11T09:53:03.858Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}