# arXiv cs.AI: When Connectivity Misleads: Guiding Agentic Search with Contrastive Evidence Paths [Canonical reading](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-when-connectivity-misleads-guiding-agentic-search-3a297c54) In an arXiv cs.AI paper, the authors argue that document connections can mislead search agents: highly connected documents may rank highly because they are easy to reach, not because they offer better evidence. They say flat node scores can also hide paths between sources that would help agents continue exploring. The authors propose Contrastive Evidence Paths (CEP), which scores a candidate using its strongest individual paths on a query-conditioned document graph, then calibrates those scores against the graph’s background visitation distribution. Their Structured Corpus Interaction (SCI) approach arranges candidates and connecting paths into a structured Map, so agents can check source documents and expand from anchor documents to seek missing information. In experiments on BrowseComp-Plus and TREC-COVID, the authors report that SCI achieved state-of-the-art answer accuracy and nDCG@10 with the lowest generation cost. They also report maximum reductions exceeding 50% in tool calls and 40% in total generation costs compared with the strongest baselines by task performance. These are reported experimental results; the abstract does not establish how well the methods perform in other search settings. An open question is whether SCI’s reported accuracy and cost advantages hold on other tasks and corpora, beyond BrowseComp-Plus and TREC-COVID. Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims. ## Original source arXiv cs.AI · Article Original source date: Oct 26, 2026 (2026-10-26). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-05T00:32:01.857Z. First observed: 2026-10-28T07:42:35.200Z. Retrieved: 2026-10-29T22:46:33.214Z. - [When Connectivity Misleads: Guiding Agentic Search with Contrastive Evidence Paths](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36134) ## Limits The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract, which does not include experiment details or results beyond the reported tasks and comparisons. ## Open question Do SCI’s reported accuracy and cost advantages hold on search tasks and corpora beyond BrowseComp-Plus and TREC-COVID? ## Source-stated The authors argue that highly connected documents can rank highly because they are easier to reach, without necessarily offering more valuable evidence. > documents may rank highly because their numerous connections make them easier to reach, without necessarily providing more valuable evidence - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36134) ## Source-stated The authors propose CEP, which scores candidates by their strongest individual paths and calibrates the scores against the graph’s background visitation distribution. > scores candidates by their strongest individual paths on a query-conditioned document graph and calibrates these scores against the same graph's background visitation distribution - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36134) ## Source-stated SCI organizes candidates and their connecting paths into a structured Map, allowing agents to verify sources and pursue missing information by expanding from anchor documents. > organizes candidates and their connecting paths into a structured Map, enabling agents to verify source documents and pursue missing information through expansion from anchor documents - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36134) ## Source-stated On BrowseComp-Plus and TREC-COVID, the authors report that SCI achieved state-of-the-art answer accuracy and nDCG@10 with the lowest generation cost. > Experiments on BrowseComp-Plus and TREC-COVID show that SCI achieves state-of-the-art answer accuracy and nDCG@10 with the lowest generation cost. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36134) ## Source-stated Compared with the strongest baselines by task performance, the authors report maximum reductions exceeding 50% in tool calls and 40% in total generation costs. > maximum reductions in tool calls and total generation costs exceed 50% and 40%, respectively. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36134) ## Source and contributor context Li, Junchen, Xu, Liang, Wang, Rongzheng, Chen, Qizhi, Wen, Junhao, Liang, Shuang · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## Agentic AI AI systems that plan and carry out a series of steps toward a goal, often by using other software, rather than giving one answer. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#agentic) ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: 7ca4ed76-beb3-416b-81c7-d3522df3f1e9. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-05T00:32:01.857Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: b2bf32ada5b6c7f12f57181626ac9730a519d7548b82688b1ecee1cff5a331f7. Source text hash: 7324fd11b007cc1169de04a1e4ea01556b9b7f5e3bf5871cf12a75061fdb95b1. ## Revision and source-check history ### Version 1 — 2026-11-05T00:32:01.857Z In an arXiv cs.AI paper, the authors argue that document connections can mislead search agents: highly connected documents may rank highly because they are easy to reach, not because they offer better evidence. They say flat node scores can also hide paths between sources that would help agents continue exploring. The authors propose Contrastive Evidence Paths (CEP), which scores a candidate using its strongest individual paths on a query-conditioned document graph, then calibrates those scores against the graph’s background visitation distribution. Their Structured Corpus Interaction (SCI) approach arranges candidates and connecting paths into a structured Map, so agents can check source documents and expand from anchor documents to seek missing information. In experiments on BrowseComp-Plus and TREC-COVID, the authors report that SCI achieved state-of-the-art answer accuracy and nDCG@10 with the lowest generation cost. They also report maximum reductions exceeding 50% in tool calls and 40% in total generation costs compared with the strongest baselines by task performance. These are reported experimental results; the abstract does not establish how well the methods perform in other search settings. An open question is whether SCI’s reported accuracy and cost advantages hold on other tasks and corpora, beyond BrowseComp-Plus and TREC-COVID. ## Original source arXiv cs.AI · Article Original source date: Oct 26, 2026 (2026-10-26). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-05T00:32:01.857Z. First observed: 2026-10-28T07:42:35.200Z. Retrieved: 2026-10-29T22:46:33.214Z. - [When Connectivity Misleads: Guiding Agentic Search with Contrastive Evidence Paths](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36134) ## Limits The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract, which does not include experiment details or results beyond the reported tasks and comparisons. ## Open question Do SCI’s reported accuracy and cost advantages hold on search tasks and corpora beyond BrowseComp-Plus and TREC-COVID? ## Source-stated The authors argue that highly connected documents can rank highly because they are easier to reach, without necessarily offering more valuable evidence. > documents may rank highly because their numerous connections make them easier to reach, without necessarily providing more valuable evidence - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36134) ## Source-stated The authors propose CEP, which scores candidates by their strongest individual paths and calibrates the scores against the graph’s background visitation distribution. > scores candidates by their strongest individual paths on a query-conditioned document graph and calibrates these scores against the same graph's background visitation distribution - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36134) ## Source-stated SCI organizes candidates and their connecting paths into a structured Map, allowing agents to verify sources and pursue missing information by expanding from anchor documents. > organizes candidates and their connecting paths into a structured Map, enabling agents to verify source documents and pursue missing information through expansion from anchor documents - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36134) ## Source-stated On BrowseComp-Plus and TREC-COVID, the authors report that SCI achieved state-of-the-art answer accuracy and nDCG@10 with the lowest generation cost. > Experiments on BrowseComp-Plus and TREC-COVID show that SCI achieves state-of-the-art answer accuracy and nDCG@10 with the lowest generation cost. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36134) ## Source-stated Compared with the strongest baselines by task performance, the authors report maximum reductions exceeding 50% in tool calls and 40% in total generation costs. > maximum reductions in tool calls and total generation costs exceed 50% and 40%, respectively. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36134) ## Source and contributor context Li, Junchen, Xu, Liang, Wang, Rongzheng, Chen, Qizhi, Wen, Junhao, Liang, Shuang · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## Agentic AI AI systems that plan and carry out a series of steps toward a goal, often by using other software, rather than giving one answer. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#agentic) ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: 7ca4ed76-beb3-416b-81c7-d3522df3f1e9. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-05T00:32:01.857Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: b2bf32ada5b6c7f12f57181626ac9730a519d7548b82688b1ecee1cff5a331f7. Source text hash: 7324fd11b007cc1169de04a1e4ea01556b9b7f5e3bf5871cf12a75061fdb95b1. ### uncertain — 2026-11-05T00:32:01.857Z — anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 Publication: 7ca4ed76-beb3-416b-81c7-d3522df3f1e9 attribution — pass: The claims are consistently attributed to the paper's authors as their argument, proposal or reported results. Calling it an 'arXiv cs.AI paper' matches the publisher metadata, though the paper's primary listing is cs.IR, with cs.AI as a cross-list. This is minor and does not misattribute any claim. > Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) summary — uncertain: The reading is faithful, and its first paragraph conveys the connectivity-bias idea well. A non-specialist will still struggle with central terms left unexplained: 'search agents', 'query-conditioned document graph', 'background visitation distribution' (the key calibration step), 'nDCG@10', 'generation cost', and the BrowseComp-Plus and TREC-COVID benchmarks. Smallest repair: briefly explain these terms in plain language or with tooltips. It would also help to say plainly why lower tool calls and costs matter for agents. The reading omits the authors' further claim of suppressed ranking inflation and improved gold recall, which is a minor gap. > calibrates these scores against the same graph's background visitation distribution to mitigate structural bias date — pass: originalPublished is 2026-10-26, which matches the arXiv v1 submission date. The later feed date of 2026-10-29 is correctly not used. > \[Submitted on 26 Oct 2026\] support — pass: Each claim is a close paraphrase of the abstract and keeps the 'maximum reductions' qualifier and the 'strongest baselines by task performance' condition. The reading presents the results as reported, not verified. Its limitation and question appropriately flag that generalization beyond the two benchmarks is unknown, without asserting otherwise. > Compared with the strongest baselines by task performance, maximum reductions in tool calls and total generation costs exceed 50% and 40%, respectively. media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct link to the arXiv abstract page, which is the original source. It is the most direct and relevant choice, since no other source media was found. ## Recorded references Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter. No public references recorded here yet. [Reference data (JSON)](/readings/3a297c54ce7e2c0e11760f4297a64ce2016217cf56614cad28fc57e0ae590681/references.json) ## Corrections and challenges [Send a correction or an opposing source](https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/) [JSON record](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-cs-ai-when-connectivity-misleads-guiding-agentic-search-3a297c54.json)