# arXiv eess.SY: A proposed power-swing blocking scheme for inverter-based power systems [Canonical reading](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-eess-sy-a-proposed-power-swing-blocking-scheme-for-fc4f604e) Henrik Johansson, Qianli Xing, Nathaniel Taylor and Xiongfei Wang propose a power-swing blocking scheme based on higher-order incremental quantities (IQs) for difficult power-swing scenarios involving inverter-based resources (IBRs) and synchronous generators (SGs). Power-swing blocking is used in distance protection, which helps distinguish power swings from faults. The authors argue that conventional schemes using blinders can struggle when apparent impedance moves quickly through the small region between blinders. They also identify a case where blinders cannot operate: impedance is inside them when a fault clears, then enters distance zones during the first swing cycle. The authors report that PSCAD/EMTDC simulations involving a synchronous generator and an implemented grid-forming (GFM) inverter show superior performance compared with conventional dual-blinder schemes. They also discuss how GFM inverters affect the impedance measured by distance relays during the fault-to-swing transition and first power swing cycle. These reported results are from simulations; the abstract gives no results from operating power systems. Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims. ## Original source arXiv eess.SY · Article Original source date: Nov 5, 2026 (2026-11-05). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-08T16:46:47.131Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:01:00.666Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-08T16:45:52.776Z. - [Power-Swing Blocking Scheme Based on Continuous and Higher-Order Incremental Quantities for Systems with Inverter-Based Resources](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07796) ## Limits The reported performance comparison is based on PSCAD/EMTDC simulations; the abstract does not report results from operating power systems. The evidence supplied is the abstract, so it does not provide the simulation setup, quantitative performance measures or detailed results. ## Open question How would the reported performance compare with conventional dual-blinder schemes in operating power systems, beyond the PSCAD/EMTDC simulations? ## Source-stated The authors propose a power-swing blocking scheme using higher-order incremental quantities for difficult scenarios involving inverter-based resources and synchronous generators. > This paper proposes a novel PSB scheme based on higher-order incremental quantities (IQs) for difficult swing scenarios with IBRs and synchronous generators (SGs). - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07796) ## Source-stated The authors identify limitations of blinder-based power-swing blocking when apparent impedance moves quickly between blinders or enters distance zones after a fault clears. > the blinder-based PSB methodology suffers from being dependent on the speed of the apparent impedance trajectory over the tiny region between the blinders - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07796) ## Source-stated The authors report superior performance over conventional dual-blinder schemes in PSCAD/EMTDC simulations. > PSCAD/EMTDC simulations of an SG and an implemented grid-forming (GFM) inverter validate its superior performance compared to conventional dual-blinder PSB schemes. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07796) ## Source-stated The paper discusses the effect of grid-forming inverters on relay-measured impedance during the fault-to-swing transition and first power swing cycle. > The impacts of GFM inverters on the impedance measured by distance relays during the fault-to-swing transition and first power swing cycle are also discussed. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07796) ## Source and contributor context Johansson, Henrik, Xing, Qianli, Taylor, Nathaniel, Wang, Xiongfei · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: e1a7babe-14d5-4652-8b64-6829f69563f0. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-08T16:46:47.131Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: 6d98d36a273e989ac5916fbca2c005cd1e698fabc58dfc43d23be1aaf18433ca. Source text hash: be55f7fa8a6091aa7eabb34c3e175dfb9246180a46e26dcdc2a87c8db28040fb. ## Revision and source-check history ### Version 1 — 2026-11-08T16:46:47.131Z Henrik Johansson, Qianli Xing, Nathaniel Taylor and Xiongfei Wang propose a power-swing blocking scheme based on higher-order incremental quantities (IQs) for difficult power-swing scenarios involving inverter-based resources (IBRs) and synchronous generators (SGs). Power-swing blocking is used in distance protection, which helps distinguish power swings from faults. The authors argue that conventional schemes using blinders can struggle when apparent impedance moves quickly through the small region between blinders. They also identify a case where blinders cannot operate: impedance is inside them when a fault clears, then enters distance zones during the first swing cycle. The authors report that PSCAD/EMTDC simulations involving a synchronous generator and an implemented grid-forming (GFM) inverter show superior performance compared with conventional dual-blinder schemes. They also discuss how GFM inverters affect the impedance measured by distance relays during the fault-to-swing transition and first power swing cycle. These reported results are from simulations; the abstract gives no results from operating power systems. ## Original source arXiv eess.SY · Article Original source date: Nov 5, 2026 (2026-11-05). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-08T16:46:47.131Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:01:00.666Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-08T16:45:52.776Z. - [Power-Swing Blocking Scheme Based on Continuous and Higher-Order Incremental Quantities for Systems with Inverter-Based Resources](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07796) ## Limits The reported performance comparison is based on PSCAD/EMTDC simulations; the abstract does not report results from operating power systems. The evidence supplied is the abstract, so it does not provide the simulation setup, quantitative performance measures or detailed results. ## Open question How would the reported performance compare with conventional dual-blinder schemes in operating power systems, beyond the PSCAD/EMTDC simulations? ## Source-stated The authors propose a power-swing blocking scheme using higher-order incremental quantities for difficult scenarios involving inverter-based resources and synchronous generators. > This paper proposes a novel PSB scheme based on higher-order incremental quantities (IQs) for difficult swing scenarios with IBRs and synchronous generators (SGs). - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07796) ## Source-stated The authors identify limitations of blinder-based power-swing blocking when apparent impedance moves quickly between blinders or enters distance zones after a fault clears. > the blinder-based PSB methodology suffers from being dependent on the speed of the apparent impedance trajectory over the tiny region between the blinders - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07796) ## Source-stated The authors report superior performance over conventional dual-blinder schemes in PSCAD/EMTDC simulations. > PSCAD/EMTDC simulations of an SG and an implemented grid-forming (GFM) inverter validate its superior performance compared to conventional dual-blinder PSB schemes. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07796) ## Source-stated The paper discusses the effect of grid-forming inverters on relay-measured impedance during the fault-to-swing transition and first power swing cycle. > The impacts of GFM inverters on the impedance measured by distance relays during the fault-to-swing transition and first power swing cycle are also discussed. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07796) ## Source and contributor context Johansson, Henrik, Xing, Qianli, Taylor, Nathaniel, Wang, Xiongfei · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: e1a7babe-14d5-4652-8b64-6829f69563f0. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-08T16:46:47.131Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: 6d98d36a273e989ac5916fbca2c005cd1e698fabc58dfc43d23be1aaf18433ca. Source text hash: be55f7fa8a6091aa7eabb34c3e175dfb9246180a46e26dcdc2a87c8db28040fb. ### uncertain — 2026-11-08T16:46:47.131Z — anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 Publication: e1a7babe-14d5-4652-8b64-6829f69563f0 attribution — pass: The draft correctly credits the proposal and reported simulation results to Henrik Johansson, Qianli Xing, Nathaniel Taylor and Xiongfei Wang. It labels the source as an arXiv eess.SY paper and keeps the claims as the authors' own. > Authors:Henrik Johansson, Qianli Xing, Nathaniel Taylor, Xiongfei Wang summary — uncertain: The draft follows the abstract faithfully, but a reader without specialist background cannot easily follow it. Central terms are left unexplained or only partly explained, including distance protection, blinders, apparent impedance, incremental quantities, inverter-based resources, grid-forming inverter and PSCAD/EMTDC. The draft also does not say in plain language why a missed or false relay trip matters, so the stakes stay opaque. Smallest repair: add a short plain-language explanation of what distance relays do during faults and swings, what blinders are, and that IBRs are sources such as solar and batteries connected through inverters, using term-library tooltips where available. > making it difficult to distinguish between fast swings and faults date — pass: The originalPublished value of 2026-11-05 matches the arXiv v1 submission date shown in the source. > \[v1\] Thu, 5 Nov 2026 10:34:10 UTC (3,904 KB) support — pass: Each claim matches the abstract: the proposed IQ-based scheme, the two blinder limitations, the simulated superiority over dual-blinder schemes, and the discussion of GFM effects on measured impedance. The caveat that results come from simulations is supported. The question about performance in operating power systems follows from that gap and does not presuppose an answer. > PSCAD/EMTDC simulations of an SG and an implemented grid-forming (GFM) inverter validate its superior performance compared to conventional dual-blinder PSB schemes. media — pass: The selected media is the verified arXiv abstract page for this paper. It is the direct original source. ## Recorded references Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter. No public references recorded here yet. [Reference data (JSON)](/readings/fc4f604e0ec30815d1243a203fda49d8647f960691992a2650578e45f18e6342/references.json) ## Corrections and challenges [Send a correction or an opposing source](https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/) [JSON record](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-eess-sy-a-proposed-power-swing-blocking-scheme-for-fc4f604e.json)