# arXiv eess.SY: Borquez and Fisac propose confidence-modulated safety filters [Canonical reading](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-eess-sy-borquez-and-fisac-propose-confidence-modulated-91a1bc6a) Javier Borquez and Jaime F. Fisac propose adjusting a safety filter at runtime according to an end-to-end policy’s confidence. A safety filter wraps a policy that chooses actions from observations; the authors describe two domains: the operational design domain (ODD), where the filter’s assumptions hold and safety is certified, and the policy’s competence domain, where it is reliable. Their proposal uses confidence to vary how conservative the filter is: inside the ODD, it can allow more performance; beyond it, low confidence adds safety margin, which may help when confidence signals that the filter’s model is failing. The idea is to avoid fixing the filter’s conservativeness everywhere, a choice the authors say trades performance inside the ODD against margin beyond it. The abstract reports preliminary F1TENTH simulations in which the approach combines strengths of permissive and conservative filters. That is simulation evidence, not a demonstration of safety or performance in deployed robots. The proposal’s practical significance therefore remains tied to whether confidence can usefully guide filtering in settings beyond those preliminary simulations. Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims. ## Original source arXiv eess.SY · Article Original source date: Oct 29, 2026 (2026-10-29). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-10T11:33:27.741Z. First observed: 2026-11-02T05:06:24.972Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-02T09:16:58.658Z. - [Confidence-Modulated Safety Filtering for End-to-End Policies](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40922) ## Limits The evidence is the paper’s abstract; it describes the F1TENTH results as preliminary simulations. The abstract does not report how the proposal performs beyond those simulations. ## Open question How does confidence-modulated filtering perform beyond the preliminary F1TENTH simulations reported in the abstract? ## Source-stated The authors propose a filter-agnostic pipeline that adjusts a safety filter’s conservativeness at runtime based on policy confidence. > propose a filter-agnostic pipeline that modulates it at runtime - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40922) ## Source-stated The authors distinguish the filter’s operational design domain, where its assumptions hold and safety is certified, from the policy’s competence domain, where it is reliable. > the filter's operational design domain (ODD), where its assumptions hold and safety is certified, and the policy's competence domain, where it is reliable - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40922) ## Source-stated The proposal uses confidence to trade performance inside the ODD against added safety margin beyond it. > inside the ODD, where every setting is safe, confidence buys performance; beyond it, low confidence adds margin - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40922) ## Source-stated The abstract reports preliminary F1TENTH simulations in which the modulated filter combines strengths of permissive and conservative filters. > Preliminary F1TENTH simulations, where this holds, show the modulated filter combining the strengths of permissive and conservative filters. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40922) ## Source and contributor context Borquez, Javier, Fisac, Jaime F. · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: 8de6028c-eaef-4229-8164-f9304b99a45b. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-10T11:33:27.741Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: 126e4a658918a8f6a8dfa1d8a575535074f8c118f622d1106a4e1d90a36f26be. Source text hash: adc2e05dcda657377cea6a7c72582bd7fdd697cf2b0eb0c70721e22c10360fad. ## Revision and source-check history ### Version 1 — 2026-11-10T11:33:27.741Z Javier Borquez and Jaime F. Fisac propose adjusting a safety filter at runtime according to an end-to-end policy’s confidence. A safety filter wraps a policy that chooses actions from observations; the authors describe two domains: the operational design domain (ODD), where the filter’s assumptions hold and safety is certified, and the policy’s competence domain, where it is reliable. Their proposal uses confidence to vary how conservative the filter is: inside the ODD, it can allow more performance; beyond it, low confidence adds safety margin, which may help when confidence signals that the filter’s model is failing. The idea is to avoid fixing the filter’s conservativeness everywhere, a choice the authors say trades performance inside the ODD against margin beyond it. The abstract reports preliminary F1TENTH simulations in which the approach combines strengths of permissive and conservative filters. That is simulation evidence, not a demonstration of safety or performance in deployed robots. The proposal’s practical significance therefore remains tied to whether confidence can usefully guide filtering in settings beyond those preliminary simulations. ## Original source arXiv eess.SY · Article Original source date: Oct 29, 2026 (2026-10-29). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-10T11:33:27.741Z. First observed: 2026-11-02T05:06:24.972Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-02T09:16:58.658Z. - [Confidence-Modulated Safety Filtering for End-to-End Policies](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40922) ## Limits The evidence is the paper’s abstract; it describes the F1TENTH results as preliminary simulations. The abstract does not report how the proposal performs beyond those simulations. ## Open question How does confidence-modulated filtering perform beyond the preliminary F1TENTH simulations reported in the abstract? ## Source-stated The authors propose a filter-agnostic pipeline that adjusts a safety filter’s conservativeness at runtime based on policy confidence. > propose a filter-agnostic pipeline that modulates it at runtime - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40922) ## Source-stated The authors distinguish the filter’s operational design domain, where its assumptions hold and safety is certified, from the policy’s competence domain, where it is reliable. > the filter's operational design domain (ODD), where its assumptions hold and safety is certified, and the policy's competence domain, where it is reliable - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40922) ## Source-stated The proposal uses confidence to trade performance inside the ODD against added safety margin beyond it. > inside the ODD, where every setting is safe, confidence buys performance; beyond it, low confidence adds margin - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40922) ## Source-stated The abstract reports preliminary F1TENTH simulations in which the modulated filter combines strengths of permissive and conservative filters. > Preliminary F1TENTH simulations, where this holds, show the modulated filter combining the strengths of permissive and conservative filters. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40922) ## Source and contributor context Borquez, Javier, Fisac, Jaime F. · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: 8de6028c-eaef-4229-8164-f9304b99a45b. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-10T11:33:27.741Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: 126e4a658918a8f6a8dfa1d8a575535074f8c118f622d1106a4e1d90a36f26be. Source text hash: adc2e05dcda657377cea6a7c72582bd7fdd697cf2b0eb0c70721e22c10360fad. ### uncertain — 2026-11-10T11:33:27.741Z — anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 Publication: 8de6028c-eaef-4229-8164-f9304b99a45b attribution — pass: The draft correctly attributes the proposal to Javier Borquez and Jaime F. Fisac. The paper is listed under cs.RO with an eess.SY cross-listing, so the arXiv eess.SY label is acceptable. > Authors:Javier Borquez, Jaime F. Fisac summary — uncertain: The summary drops the abstract's condition on the simulation result, 'where this holds'. The simulations show benefits in a setting where low confidence does flag filter-model failure. Without that condition, the result reads as more general than stated. Smallest repair: say the simulations were run where confidence flags filter failure. F1TENTH is also unexplained for non-specialists; suggest a term-library tooltip. 'May help' softens the source's 'helps when it flags', but it reasonably keeps the condition. > Preliminary F1TENTH simulations, where this holds, show the modulated filter combining the strengths of permissive and conservative filters. date — pass: originalPublished is 2026-10-29, which matches the v1 submission date. The feed date of 2026-11-02 is later and was correctly not used. > \[Submitted on 29 Oct 2026\] support — uncertain: Claim 3 says the proposal uses confidence 'to trade performance inside the ODD against added safety margin beyond it.' In the source, that trade-off is the problem with fixed-conservativeness filters. The modulation is meant to get performance inside the ODD (where every setting is safe) and margin beyond it, not to trade one for the other. Smallest repair: confidence buys performance inside the ODD, while low confidence adds margin beyond it. The other claims are grounded, and the caveat that results are preliminary simulations is appropriate. > Filters typically fix their conservativeness regardless of the policy's competence, trading performance inside the ODD against margin beyond it. media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper, which is the most direct access to the source. ## Recorded references Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter. No public references recorded here yet. [Reference data (JSON)](/readings/91a1bc6a96a483061fdaae519dbc4da9a2015b8490a1dce1e250cdcfa2ed1d3a/references.json) ## Corrections and challenges [Send a correction or an opposing source](https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/) [JSON record](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-eess-sy-borquez-and-fisac-propose-confidence-modulated-91a1bc6a.json)