{"id":"96962a437c5e9798fe6f3da0ab1eecd98add922e2c7ddf32f9ce42f1df9328a9","title":"arXiv eess.SY paper reports outdoor tests of decentralized collision verification for UAV swarms","argument":"In a paper by Grant Phillips, Hoang-Dung Tran, and Justin M. Bradley, the authors describe deploying a decentralized safety verification algorithm on an outdoor swarm of uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs). The approach checks whether vehicles can avoid collisions while operating, rather than relying only on numerical simulations or controlled, noiseless indoor tests. The authors argue that real-world performance depends critically on how an algorithm’s assumptions fit the implementation details of the target system. Their experiments covered 140 outdoor vehicle flights, including six flights with eight UAVs. The authors report that the approach efficiently verifies safety in real time and helps agents take safe actions. They also report an average of approximately 500–520 ms for each agent to verify safety for the next four seconds; reachable set broadcast time, when agents share information about where they may travel, dominated that total. These results offer researchers a concrete account of the timing and implementation challenges encountered in outdoor swarm testing. The abstract does not establish how the approach performs beyond the tested system and conditions.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The abstract describes results on a size, weight, and power-constrained UAV swarm, including six swarm flights with eight UAVs; it does not establish performance on other systems or conditions. The reported verification time is an average, and the abstract says reachable set broadcast time dominates; it does not give a distribution of timings. The source provides the authors’ summary of results; this reading does not assess the paper’s full methods or underlying data.","speaker":{"name":"Phillips, Grant, Tran, Hoang-Dung, Bradley, Justin M.","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Robust Safety Assurance for Robotic Swarms Using Decentralized Collision Verification","publisher":"arXiv eess.SY","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","publishedAt":"2026-10-31","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors say they deployed a decentralized safety verification algorithm on a robotic swarm in an outdoor environment to prevent collisions at runtime.","excerpt":"deploy a decentralized safety verification algorithm on a robotic swarm to prevent collisions at runtime in an outdoor environment","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that aligning algorithmic assumptions with target-system implementation details is critical to real-world efficacy.","excerpt":"the underlying algorithmic assumptions juxtaposed against the implementation details of the target system are critical factors in a method's efficacy in the real world","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The reported experiments comprised 140 outdoor vehicle flights, including six swarm flights with eight UAVs.","excerpt":"140 total outdoor vehicle flights, including 6 swarm flights composed of 8 UAVs","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report an average verification time of approximately 500–520 ms per agent for the next four seconds, with reachable set broadcast time dominating.","excerpt":"each agent, using our open-source safety_checker library, takes approximately 500-520 ms to verify its safety for the next 4 s into the future, in which the reachable set broadcast time dominates the total verification time","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that their approach can efficiently verify multiple UAVs' safety in real time and help agents take safe actions to avoid collisions.","excerpt":"efficiently verify the safety of multiple UAVs in real-time and help all agents take safe actions to avoid collisions","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T07:04:08.311Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How would verification performance and timing change on other swarm systems or under different outdoor conditions?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv eess.SY paper reports outdoor tests of decentralized collision verification for UAV swarms","summary":"In a paper by Grant Phillips, Hoang-Dung Tran, and Justin M. Bradley, the authors describe deploying a decentralized safety verification algorithm on an outdoor swarm of uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs). The approach checks whether vehicles can avoid collisions while operating, rather than relying only on numerical simulations or controlled, noiseless indoor tests. The authors argue that real-world performance depends critically on how an algorithm’s assumptions fit the implementation details of the target system. Their experiments covered 140 outdoor vehicle flights, including six flights with eight UAVs. The authors report that the approach efficiently verifies safety in real time and helps agents take safe actions. They also report an average of approximately 500–520 ms for each agent to verify safety for the next four seconds; reachable set broadcast time, when agents share information about where they may travel, dominated that total. These results offer researchers a concrete account of the timing and implementation challenges encountered in outdoor swarm testing. The abstract does not establish how the approach performs beyond the tested system and conditions.","question":"How would verification performance and timing change on other swarm systems or under different outdoor conditions?","claims":[{"text":"The authors say they deployed a decentralized safety verification algorithm on a robotic swarm in an outdoor environment to prevent collisions at runtime.","excerpt":"deploy a decentralized safety verification algorithm on a robotic swarm to prevent collisions at runtime in an outdoor environment","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that aligning algorithmic assumptions with target-system implementation details is critical to real-world efficacy.","excerpt":"the underlying algorithmic assumptions juxtaposed against the implementation details of the target system are critical factors in a method's efficacy in the real world","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The reported experiments comprised 140 outdoor vehicle flights, including six swarm flights with eight UAVs.","excerpt":"140 total outdoor vehicle flights, including 6 swarm flights composed of 8 UAVs","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report an average verification time of approximately 500–520 ms per agent for the next four seconds, with reachable set broadcast time dominating.","excerpt":"each agent, using our open-source safety_checker library, takes approximately 500-520 ms to verify its safety for the next 4 s into the future, in which the reachable set broadcast time dominates the total verification time","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that their approach can efficiently verify multiple UAVs' safety in real time and help agents take safe actions to avoid collisions.","excerpt":"efficiently verify the safety of multiple UAVs in real-time and help all agents take safe actions to avoid collisions","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The abstract describes results on a size, weight, and power-constrained UAV swarm, including six swarm flights with eight UAVs; it does not establish performance on other systems or conditions.","The reported verification time is an average, and the abstract says reachable set broadcast time dominates; it does not give a distribution of timings.","The source provides the authors’ summary of results; this reading does not assess the paper’s full methods or underlying data."],"mediaId":"51fd8a3f8de715e2d7856cd2e603a6c8f4342e4aa860b3ecbca3b0add20fdc1c","correctionReason":null,"id":"96962a437c5e9798fe6f3da0ab1eecd98add922e2c7ddf32f9ce42f1df9328a9","publicationId":"31f9b601-ce24-4cb5-8995-06c54b9f5095","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","sourceTitle":"Robust Safety Assurance for Robotic Swarms Using Decentralized Collision Verification","publisher":"arXiv eess.SY","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-31","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-03T08:51:16.415Z","createdAt":"2026-11-10T06:32:18.328Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"51fd8a3f8de715e2d7856cd2e603a6c8f4342e4aa860b3ecbca3b0add20fdc1c","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-04T03:46:09.631Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T07:04:08.311Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"51fd8a3f8de715e2d7856cd2e603a6c8f4342e4aa860b3ecbca3b0add20fdc1c","confidence":0.5700000000000001,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"4dd2c0c0577af2ee7c89f35696d6b05dd4e5c38b4a984f56cd8a4bdcd9243a22","decidedAt":"2026-11-04T03:46:11.569Z","redecided":{"from":"stream-admission-v5","under":"stream-admission-v5+confidence-0.5"}},"provenance":{"textHash":"1a4fc74136c937b9cc8ad4c9b9ffc374293b9fee7af9ea55027f7ca93f3efe1d","observationId":"0e139fac929e9d5d888a3e839f9c6e277b2b6378a6e1d43dce60ad6a5cc12ff5","retrievedAt":"2026-11-04T03:46:09.351Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"97b7885d-45b8-4d5d-831d-6d6e15b585e8"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"b16c9173-f039-4cdc-881c-5b8c10d09472"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-10T06:32:18.328Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Phillips, Grant","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Tran, Hoang-Dung","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Bradley, Justin M.","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Phillips, Grant","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Phillips, Grant","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"650673166af024856201a8269efbee25f8cbdfe2a41c48a2d8b7603b785595f5:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T07:04:08.311Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"650673166af024856201a8269efbee25f8cbdfe2a41c48a2d8b7603b785595f5","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","contentSha256":"fb519f0279cc0ff16f4488c88ff5a23ee9ce04a4a7eea9a8ae99f48fd7f85f55","textHash":"1a4fc74136c937b9cc8ad4c9b9ffc374293b9fee7af9ea55027f7ca93f3efe1d","observedAt":"2026-11-10T07:04:08.311Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Tran, Hoang-Dung","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Tran, Hoang-Dung","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"650673166af024856201a8269efbee25f8cbdfe2a41c48a2d8b7603b785595f5:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T07:04:08.311Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"650673166af024856201a8269efbee25f8cbdfe2a41c48a2d8b7603b785595f5","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","contentSha256":"fb519f0279cc0ff16f4488c88ff5a23ee9ce04a4a7eea9a8ae99f48fd7f85f55","textHash":"1a4fc74136c937b9cc8ad4c9b9ffc374293b9fee7af9ea55027f7ca93f3efe1d","observedAt":"2026-11-10T07:04:08.311Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Bradley, Justin M.","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Bradley, Justin M.","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"650673166af024856201a8269efbee25f8cbdfe2a41c48a2d8b7603b785595f5:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T07:04:08.311Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"650673166af024856201a8269efbee25f8cbdfe2a41c48a2d8b7603b785595f5","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","contentSha256":"fb519f0279cc0ff16f4488c88ff5a23ee9ce04a4a7eea9a8ae99f48fd7f85f55","textHash":"1a4fc74136c937b9cc8ad4c9b9ffc374293b9fee7af9ea55027f7ca93f3efe1d","observedAt":"2026-11-10T07:04:08.311Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":3,"returned":3,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","snapshotId":"650673166af024856201a8269efbee25f8cbdfe2a41c48a2d8b7603b785595f5","contentSha256":"fb519f0279cc0ff16f4488c88ff5a23ee9ce04a4a7eea9a8ae99f48fd7f85f55","textHash":"1a4fc74136c937b9cc8ad4c9b9ffc374293b9fee7af9ea55027f7ca93f3efe1d","observedAt":"2026-11-10T07:04:08.311Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":46,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/96962a437c5e9798fe6f3da0ab1eecd98add922e2c7ddf32f9ce42f1df9328a9/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-eess-sy-paper-reports-outdoor-tests-of-decentralized-96962a43","formats":{"html":"/readings/arxiv-eess-sy-paper-reports-outdoor-tests-of-decentralized-96962a43","markdown":"/readings/arxiv-eess-sy-paper-reports-outdoor-tests-of-decentralized-96962a43.md","json":"/readings/arxiv-eess-sy-paper-reports-outdoor-tests-of-decentralized-96962a43.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"},{"id":"time","name":"TIME","kind":"organization","context":"TIME is a news magazine publishing reporting on world affairs, business, technology and the workers behind digital services.","referenceUrls":["https://time.com/"],"path":"/entities/time","json":"/entities/time.json","markdown":"/entities/time.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"96962a437c5e9798fe6f3da0ab1eecd98add922e2c7ddf32f9ce42f1df9328a9","revision":"31f9b601-ce24-4cb5-8995-06c54b9f5095","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"arXiv eess.SY paper reports outdoor tests of decentralized collision verification for UAV swarms","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-eess-sy-paper-reports-outdoor-tests-of-decentralized-96962a43"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","revision":"1a4fc74136c937b9cc8ad4c9b9ffc374293b9fee7af9ea55027f7ca93f3efe1d","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Robust Safety Assurance for Robotic Swarms Using Decentralized Collision Verification","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"96962a437c5e9798fe6f3da0ab1eecd98add922e2c7ddf32f9ce42f1df9328a9","title":"arXiv eess.SY paper reports outdoor tests of decentralized collision verification for UAV swarms","argument":"In a paper by Grant Phillips, Hoang-Dung Tran, and Justin M. Bradley, the authors describe deploying a decentralized safety verification algorithm on an outdoor swarm of uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs). The approach checks whether vehicles can avoid collisions while operating, rather than relying only on numerical simulations or controlled, noiseless indoor tests. The authors argue that real-world performance depends critically on how an algorithm’s assumptions fit the implementation details of the target system. Their experiments covered 140 outdoor vehicle flights, including six flights with eight UAVs. The authors report that the approach efficiently verifies safety in real time and helps agents take safe actions. They also report an average of approximately 500–520 ms for each agent to verify safety for the next four seconds; reachable set broadcast time, when agents share information about where they may travel, dominated that total. These results offer researchers a concrete account of the timing and implementation challenges encountered in outdoor swarm testing. The abstract does not establish how the approach performs beyond the tested system and conditions.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The abstract describes results on a size, weight, and power-constrained UAV swarm, including six swarm flights with eight UAVs; it does not establish performance on other systems or conditions. The reported verification time is an average, and the abstract says reachable set broadcast time dominates; it does not give a distribution of timings. The source provides the authors’ summary of results; this reading does not assess the paper’s full methods or underlying data.","speaker":{"name":"Phillips, Grant, Tran, Hoang-Dung, Bradley, Justin M.","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Robust Safety Assurance for Robotic Swarms Using Decentralized Collision Verification","publisher":"arXiv eess.SY","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","publishedAt":"2026-10-31","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors say they deployed a decentralized safety verification algorithm on a robotic swarm in an outdoor environment to prevent collisions at runtime.","excerpt":"deploy a decentralized safety verification algorithm on a robotic swarm to prevent collisions at runtime in an outdoor environment","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that aligning algorithmic assumptions with target-system implementation details is critical to real-world efficacy.","excerpt":"the underlying algorithmic assumptions juxtaposed against the implementation details of the target system are critical factors in a method's efficacy in the real world","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The reported experiments comprised 140 outdoor vehicle flights, including six swarm flights with eight UAVs.","excerpt":"140 total outdoor vehicle flights, including 6 swarm flights composed of 8 UAVs","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report an average verification time of approximately 500–520 ms per agent for the next four seconds, with reachable set broadcast time dominating.","excerpt":"each agent, using our open-source safety_checker library, takes approximately 500-520 ms to verify its safety for the next 4 s into the future, in which the reachable set broadcast time dominates the total verification time","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that their approach can efficiently verify multiple UAVs' safety in real time and help agents take safe actions to avoid collisions.","excerpt":"efficiently verify the safety of multiple UAVs in real-time and help all agents take safe actions to avoid collisions","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T07:04:08.311Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How would verification performance and timing change on other swarm systems or under different outdoor conditions?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"arXiv eess.SY paper reports outdoor tests of decentralized collision verification for UAV swarms","summary":"In a paper by Grant Phillips, Hoang-Dung Tran, and Justin M. Bradley, the authors describe deploying a decentralized safety verification algorithm on an outdoor swarm of uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs). The approach checks whether vehicles can avoid collisions while operating, rather than relying only on numerical simulations or controlled, noiseless indoor tests. The authors argue that real-world performance depends critically on how an algorithm’s assumptions fit the implementation details of the target system. Their experiments covered 140 outdoor vehicle flights, including six flights with eight UAVs. The authors report that the approach efficiently verifies safety in real time and helps agents take safe actions. They also report an average of approximately 500–520 ms for each agent to verify safety for the next four seconds; reachable set broadcast time, when agents share information about where they may travel, dominated that total. These results offer researchers a concrete account of the timing and implementation challenges encountered in outdoor swarm testing. The abstract does not establish how the approach performs beyond the tested system and conditions.","question":"How would verification performance and timing change on other swarm systems or under different outdoor conditions?","claims":[{"text":"The authors say they deployed a decentralized safety verification algorithm on a robotic swarm in an outdoor environment to prevent collisions at runtime.","excerpt":"deploy a decentralized safety verification algorithm on a robotic swarm to prevent collisions at runtime in an outdoor environment","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that aligning algorithmic assumptions with target-system implementation details is critical to real-world efficacy.","excerpt":"the underlying algorithmic assumptions juxtaposed against the implementation details of the target system are critical factors in a method's efficacy in the real world","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The reported experiments comprised 140 outdoor vehicle flights, including six swarm flights with eight UAVs.","excerpt":"140 total outdoor vehicle flights, including 6 swarm flights composed of 8 UAVs","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report an average verification time of approximately 500–520 ms per agent for the next four seconds, with reachable set broadcast time dominating.","excerpt":"each agent, using our open-source safety_checker library, takes approximately 500-520 ms to verify its safety for the next 4 s into the future, in which the reachable set broadcast time dominates the total verification time","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that their approach can efficiently verify multiple UAVs' safety in real time and help agents take safe actions to avoid collisions.","excerpt":"efficiently verify the safety of multiple UAVs in real-time and help all agents take safe actions to avoid collisions","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The abstract describes results on a size, weight, and power-constrained UAV swarm, including six swarm flights with eight UAVs; it does not establish performance on other systems or conditions.","The reported verification time is an average, and the abstract says reachable set broadcast time dominates; it does not give a distribution of timings.","The source provides the authors’ summary of results; this reading does not assess the paper’s full methods or underlying data."],"mediaId":"51fd8a3f8de715e2d7856cd2e603a6c8f4342e4aa860b3ecbca3b0add20fdc1c","correctionReason":null,"id":"96962a437c5e9798fe6f3da0ab1eecd98add922e2c7ddf32f9ce42f1df9328a9","publicationId":"31f9b601-ce24-4cb5-8995-06c54b9f5095","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","sourceTitle":"Robust Safety Assurance for Robotic Swarms Using Decentralized Collision Verification","publisher":"arXiv eess.SY","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-31","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-03T08:51:16.415Z","createdAt":"2026-11-10T06:32:18.328Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"51fd8a3f8de715e2d7856cd2e603a6c8f4342e4aa860b3ecbca3b0add20fdc1c","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-04T03:46:09.631Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T07:04:08.311Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"51fd8a3f8de715e2d7856cd2e603a6c8f4342e4aa860b3ecbca3b0add20fdc1c","confidence":0.5700000000000001,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"4dd2c0c0577af2ee7c89f35696d6b05dd4e5c38b4a984f56cd8a4bdcd9243a22","decidedAt":"2026-11-04T03:46:11.569Z","redecided":{"from":"stream-admission-v5","under":"stream-admission-v5+confidence-0.5"}},"provenance":{"textHash":"1a4fc74136c937b9cc8ad4c9b9ffc374293b9fee7af9ea55027f7ca93f3efe1d","observationId":"0e139fac929e9d5d888a3e839f9c6e277b2b6378a6e1d43dce60ad6a5cc12ff5","retrievedAt":"2026-11-04T03:46:09.351Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"97b7885d-45b8-4d5d-831d-6d6e15b585e8"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"b16c9173-f039-4cdc-881c-5b8c10d09472"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-10T06:32:18.328Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Phillips, Grant","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Tran, Hoang-Dung","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Bradley, Justin M.","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Phillips, Grant","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Phillips, Grant","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"650673166af024856201a8269efbee25f8cbdfe2a41c48a2d8b7603b785595f5:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T07:04:08.311Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"650673166af024856201a8269efbee25f8cbdfe2a41c48a2d8b7603b785595f5","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","contentSha256":"fb519f0279cc0ff16f4488c88ff5a23ee9ce04a4a7eea9a8ae99f48fd7f85f55","textHash":"1a4fc74136c937b9cc8ad4c9b9ffc374293b9fee7af9ea55027f7ca93f3efe1d","observedAt":"2026-11-10T07:04:08.311Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Tran, Hoang-Dung","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Tran, Hoang-Dung","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"650673166af024856201a8269efbee25f8cbdfe2a41c48a2d8b7603b785595f5:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T07:04:08.311Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"650673166af024856201a8269efbee25f8cbdfe2a41c48a2d8b7603b785595f5","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","contentSha256":"fb519f0279cc0ff16f4488c88ff5a23ee9ce04a4a7eea9a8ae99f48fd7f85f55","textHash":"1a4fc74136c937b9cc8ad4c9b9ffc374293b9fee7af9ea55027f7ca93f3efe1d","observedAt":"2026-11-10T07:04:08.311Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Bradley, Justin M.","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Bradley, Justin M.","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"650673166af024856201a8269efbee25f8cbdfe2a41c48a2d8b7603b785595f5:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-10T07:04:08.311Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"650673166af024856201a8269efbee25f8cbdfe2a41c48a2d8b7603b785595f5","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","contentSha256":"fb519f0279cc0ff16f4488c88ff5a23ee9ce04a4a7eea9a8ae99f48fd7f85f55","textHash":"1a4fc74136c937b9cc8ad4c9b9ffc374293b9fee7af9ea55027f7ca93f3efe1d","observedAt":"2026-11-10T07:04:08.311Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":3,"returned":3,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01081","snapshotId":"650673166af024856201a8269efbee25f8cbdfe2a41c48a2d8b7603b785595f5","contentSha256":"fb519f0279cc0ff16f4488c88ff5a23ee9ce04a4a7eea9a8ae99f48fd7f85f55","textHash":"1a4fc74136c937b9cc8ad4c9b9ffc374293b9fee7af9ea55027f7ca93f3efe1d","observedAt":"2026-11-10T07:04:08.311Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":46,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/96962a437c5e9798fe6f3da0ab1eecd98add922e2c7ddf32f9ce42f1df9328a9/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"31f9b601-ce24-4cb5-8995-06c54b9f5095","verdict":"uncertain","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The reading correctly credits Grant Phillips, Hoang-Dung Tran and Justin M. Bradley and keeps results framed as the authors' reports. Labeling it an arXiv eess.SY paper matches the feed, though the primary category is cs.RO and the abstract page notes publication in IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.","excerpt":"Authors:Grant Phillips, Hoang-Dung Tran, Justin M. Bradley"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"uncertain","explanation":"One sentence blurs how the method works with how it was tested. The draft says the approach checks collision safety 'rather than relying only on numerical simulations or controlled, noiseless indoor tests.' The source contrasts its outdoor deployment with how verification approaches are typically evaluated. Smallest repair: say that such methods are usually evaluated only in simulation or controlled indoor settings, and that this work tested one outdoors. 'Decentralized', meaning each drone checks its own safety, is also left unexplained. The reading omits the open-source safety_checker library and the iterative improvement across flights. Neither omission is critical.","excerpt":"Typically, approaches toward verification of swarms of cyber-physical systems (CPS) are evaluated solely in numerical simulations or in highly controlled, noiseless indoor environments."},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The original publication date of 2026-10-31 matches the v1 submission date on arXiv. The feed date of 2026-11-03 is later and is correctly not used.","excerpt":"[Submitted on 31 Oct 2026]"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"Each claim matches the abstract: 140 flights, six swarm flights of eight UAVs, about 500–520 ms per agent for a 4 s horizon, broadcast time dominating, and real-time verification as the authors' claim. The significance line about guidance for researchers is supported. The limitations and the question about other systems follow from the evidence and are not leading.","excerpt":"with the objective of illustrating the challenges of real-world CPS deployments as well as provide guidance for researchers in this space"},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified direct link to the arXiv abstract page, the original source.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-10T06:32:18.328Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}