# arXiv eess.SY: Puiggros T. and Phani propose learning momenta [Canonical reading](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-eess-sy-puiggros-t-and-phani-propose-learning-momenta-216a17d4) Ignacio Puiggros T. and A. Srikantha Phani propose extending Hamiltonian-based architectures to learn a system’s generalized momenta, Hamiltonian structure and dynamics from data. Hamiltonian neural networks (HNNs) encode Hamiltonian mechanics in their structure and loss function, but the authors identify a limitation: these networks rely on data containing the target system’s generalized momenta. That can hinder their use when the momenta’s analytical form is unknown. The proposed architecture is intended for that situation: it learns generalized momenta from data on the state and its derivatives, which may be non-sequential. The authors consider a dissipative mass-spring system, a double pendulum and a rolling disk under nonholonomic constraints as examples for assessing performance. The motivating idea is to retain a Hamiltonian-based approach without requiring generalized momenta as known input. The abstract describes the problem, proposed method and examples, but does not give performance results. How well the approach works beyond the stated assessments is also not established by the abstract. Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims. ## Original source arXiv eess.SY · Article Original source date: Oct 31, 2026 (2026-10-31). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-10T09:47:45.933Z. First observed: 2026-11-03T08:51:36.813Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-03T20:46:02.808Z. - [Learning momenta for Hamiltonian-based models](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01269) ## Limits The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract; it describes the proposed method and assessment examples but gives no performance results. The abstract does not specify the data, comparison methods or detailed evaluation used for the three examples. ## Open question What performance do the authors report for the proposed architecture on the three example systems? ## Source-stated The authors identify dependence on data containing the target system’s generalized momenta as a limitation of HNNs, especially when their analytical form is unknown. > A crucial limitation of HNNs is their reliance on data on the target system's generalized momenta. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01269) ## Source-stated The authors propose an architecture that learns generalized momenta, Hamiltonian structure and dynamics from data. > simultaneously learning the system's generalized momenta, Hamiltonian structure, and dynamics from data. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01269) ## Source-stated The proposed architecture uses data on the state and its derivatives, which may be non-sequential. > only (potentially non-sequential) data on the state and its derivatives is available. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01269) ## Source-stated The authors assess the proposed architecture using three canonical examples: a dissipative mass-spring system, a double pendulum and a rolling disk under nonholonomic constraints. > A dissipative mass-spring system, a double pendulum, and a rolling disk under nonholonomic constraints are considered as canonical examples - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01269) ## Source and contributor context T., Ignacio Puiggros, Phani, A. Srikantha · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## Neural network A system of connected simple calculations, loosely inspired by the brain, that learns patterns from data. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#neural-network) ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: c448a6fe-7f78-447d-8bd7-59274dd10a7f. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-10T09:47:45.933Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: 9b46d4da1ac9a8f7946baa06ffd2fb64fe29702725dc858d9ad8e8d50847b3e0. Source text hash: 20f30a73b7a67cf14baede65359bd2a730509642d8ea183979bab02a614d2f6d. ## Revision and source-check history ### Version 1 — 2026-11-10T09:47:45.933Z Ignacio Puiggros T. and A. Srikantha Phani propose extending Hamiltonian-based architectures to learn a system’s generalized momenta, Hamiltonian structure and dynamics from data. Hamiltonian neural networks (HNNs) encode Hamiltonian mechanics in their structure and loss function, but the authors identify a limitation: these networks rely on data containing the target system’s generalized momenta. That can hinder their use when the momenta’s analytical form is unknown. The proposed architecture is intended for that situation: it learns generalized momenta from data on the state and its derivatives, which may be non-sequential. The authors consider a dissipative mass-spring system, a double pendulum and a rolling disk under nonholonomic constraints as examples for assessing performance. The motivating idea is to retain a Hamiltonian-based approach without requiring generalized momenta as known input. The abstract describes the problem, proposed method and examples, but does not give performance results. How well the approach works beyond the stated assessments is also not established by the abstract. ## Original source arXiv eess.SY · Article Original source date: Oct 31, 2026 (2026-10-31). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-10T09:47:45.933Z. First observed: 2026-11-03T08:51:36.813Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-03T20:46:02.808Z. - [Learning momenta for Hamiltonian-based models](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01269) ## Limits The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract; it describes the proposed method and assessment examples but gives no performance results. The abstract does not specify the data, comparison methods or detailed evaluation used for the three examples. ## Open question What performance do the authors report for the proposed architecture on the three example systems? ## Source-stated The authors identify dependence on data containing the target system’s generalized momenta as a limitation of HNNs, especially when their analytical form is unknown. > A crucial limitation of HNNs is their reliance on data on the target system's generalized momenta. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01269) ## Source-stated The authors propose an architecture that learns generalized momenta, Hamiltonian structure and dynamics from data. > simultaneously learning the system's generalized momenta, Hamiltonian structure, and dynamics from data. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01269) ## Source-stated The proposed architecture uses data on the state and its derivatives, which may be non-sequential. > only (potentially non-sequential) data on the state and its derivatives is available. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01269) ## Source-stated The authors assess the proposed architecture using three canonical examples: a dissipative mass-spring system, a double pendulum and a rolling disk under nonholonomic constraints. > A dissipative mass-spring system, a double pendulum, and a rolling disk under nonholonomic constraints are considered as canonical examples - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01269) ## Source and contributor context T., Ignacio Puiggros, Phani, A. Srikantha · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## Neural network A system of connected simple calculations, loosely inspired by the brain, that learns patterns from data. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#neural-network) ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: c448a6fe-7f78-447d-8bd7-59274dd10a7f. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-10T09:47:45.933Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: 9b46d4da1ac9a8f7946baa06ffd2fb64fe29702725dc858d9ad8e8d50847b3e0. Source text hash: 20f30a73b7a67cf14baede65359bd2a730509642d8ea183979bab02a614d2f6d. ### uncertain — 2026-11-10T09:47:45.933Z — anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 Publication: c448a6fe-7f78-447d-8bd7-59274dd10a7f attribution — pass: The proposal and the limitation are correctly attributed to authors Ignacio Puiggros T. and A. Srikantha Phani. Their method is presented as a proposal, not an established result. Labeling the source arXiv eess.SY matches the publisher field, though the paper's primary listing is cs.LG. > Authors:Ignacio Puiggros T., A. Srikantha Phani summary — uncertain: The central terms are never explained in plain language: generalized momenta, Hamiltonian mechanics, dissipative and nonholonomic constraints. The draft also never says HNNs build physics knowledge into neural networks to improve modeling, so non-specialists cannot see why the limitation matters. It weakens the authors' force: 'severely hampers' becomes 'can hinder', and it drops their claim that unknown momenta is frequently the case in real-world applications. Smallest repair: restore the frequency claim with attribution, add the physics-priors purpose, and add tooltips for generalized momenta and nonholonomic. > This severely hampers their applicability when the analytical form of the generalized momenta is unknown, which frequently is the case in real-world applications. date — pass: The originalPublished date of 2026-10-31 matches the v1 submission date. The later feed date was correctly not used. > \[Submitted on 31 Oct 2026\] support — pass: All four claims are directly stated in the abstract. The limitations and the question correctly note that no performance results appear in the evidence. The draft adds no benefits, costs or forecasts beyond the source. > simultaneously learning the system's generalized momenta, Hamiltonian structure, and dynamics from data media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct link to the original arXiv abstract page, which is the source itself. ## Recorded references Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter. No public references recorded here yet. [Reference data (JSON)](/readings/216a17d4508b1c5cc8e75dd411aec1e120c7603eaf2e76d3d83db10e34174441/references.json) ## Corrections and challenges [Send a correction or an opposing source](https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/) [JSON record](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-eess-sy-puiggros-t-and-phani-propose-learning-momenta-216a17d4.json)