# arXiv: FinMultiHopQA tests how evidence structure affects financial question answering [Canonical reading](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-finmultihopqa-tests-how-evidence-structure-affects-9e714f3c) The authors of FinMultiHopQA introduce a benchmark for financial questions that require combining evidence across filing sections, fiscal years and peer companies. Built from FinReflectKG, a temporally indexed financial knowledge graph derived from SEC 10-K filings, it contains 15,600 qualitative and quantitative questions. The authors also use the benchmark to test whether reasoning LLMs answer consistently when the same evidence is presented in different ways. They report that judged correctness is lower with less-structured presentations, especially for quantitative cross-company reasoning and 3-hop branch motifs. In their account, reasoning capacity alone does not fully offset the effects of evidence structure. They say KG-linked presentation also uses fewer input tokens by design. The benchmark and associated provenance annotations, model outputs, evaluation records and technical documentation are released. The abstract describes benchmark results, not how well they predict performance on financial questions outside this evaluation. Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims. ## Original source arXiv cs.AI · Article Original source date: Oct 3, 2025 (2025-10-03). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-08T05:18:51.115Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:01:01.486Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-08T05:18:10.696Z. - [FinMultiHopQA: A KG-Grounded Multi-Hop Financial QA Benchmark for Evidence-Driven Reasoning](https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02906) ## Limits The supplied evidence is the arXiv page abstract and comments, not the paper's detailed evaluation tables or methods; it does not provide result sizes or comparisons by model. The abstract reports benchmark evaluation results but does not establish how they generalize to financial questions outside the benchmark. ## Open question How do the reported differences in judged correctness vary across the six evidence presentations and evaluated models? ## Source-stated FinMultiHopQA contains 15,600 qualitative and quantitative financial questions grounded in FinReflectKG, a temporally indexed financial knowledge graph derived from SEC 10-K filings. > a benchmark of 15,600 qualitative and quantitative questions, grounded in FinReflectKG, a temporally indexed financial knowledge graph derived from SEC 10-K filings - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02906) ## Source-stated The authors vary the presentation of the same underlying evidence to test whether reasoning LLMs' performance depends on evidence structure. > hold each question's underlying evidence constant while varying only its presentation - embedding it in noisy surrounding context or changing its order - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02906) ## Source-stated The authors report consistently lower judged correctness under less-structured presentations, most sharply for quantitative cross-company reasoning and 3-hop branch motifs. > judged correctness remains consistently lower under less-structured presentations of the same evidence - most sharply for quantitative cross-company reasoning and 3-hop branch motifs - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02906) ## Source-stated The authors say KG-linked presentation uses fewer input tokens by design. > KG-linked presentation also uses fewer input tokens by design. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02906) ## Source-stated The paper releases the benchmark, provenance annotations, model outputs, evaluation records and supporting technical documentation. > We release the benchmark, provenance annotations, model outputs, evaluation records, and supporting technical documentation. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02906) ## Source and contributor context Arun, Abhinav, Harsh, Reetu Raj, Sarmah, Bhaskarjit, Pasquali, Stefano · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## Benchmark A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected. - [Definition reference](https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09110) ## Large language model A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#large-language-model) ## Model tokens Small chunks of text, often parts of words, that a language model reads and writes; usage and prices are often counted in tokens. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#token) ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: e8ef0851-3953-4e91-8471-b58061e9f114. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-08T05:18:51.115Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: 20097dcdefcdbf92533f1a0b09cc54c406176632a63e6740c31ff07560bb52a8. Source text hash: 8e1e744e32a236ab7c81ef19401ef88b0f2c9e641d30f2e36b600ce4b5d729cc. ## Revision and source-check history ### Version 1 — 2026-11-08T05:18:51.115Z The authors of FinMultiHopQA introduce a benchmark for financial questions that require combining evidence across filing sections, fiscal years and peer companies. Built from FinReflectKG, a temporally indexed financial knowledge graph derived from SEC 10-K filings, it contains 15,600 qualitative and quantitative questions. The authors also use the benchmark to test whether reasoning LLMs answer consistently when the same evidence is presented in different ways. They report that judged correctness is lower with less-structured presentations, especially for quantitative cross-company reasoning and 3-hop branch motifs. In their account, reasoning capacity alone does not fully offset the effects of evidence structure. They say KG-linked presentation also uses fewer input tokens by design. The benchmark and associated provenance annotations, model outputs, evaluation records and technical documentation are released. The abstract describes benchmark results, not how well they predict performance on financial questions outside this evaluation. ## Original source arXiv cs.AI · Article Original source date: Oct 3, 2025 (2025-10-03). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-08T05:18:51.115Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:01:01.486Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-08T05:18:10.696Z. - [FinMultiHopQA: A KG-Grounded Multi-Hop Financial QA Benchmark for Evidence-Driven Reasoning](https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02906) ## Limits The supplied evidence is the arXiv page abstract and comments, not the paper's detailed evaluation tables or methods; it does not provide result sizes or comparisons by model. The abstract reports benchmark evaluation results but does not establish how they generalize to financial questions outside the benchmark. ## Open question How do the reported differences in judged correctness vary across the six evidence presentations and evaluated models? ## Source-stated FinMultiHopQA contains 15,600 qualitative and quantitative financial questions grounded in FinReflectKG, a temporally indexed financial knowledge graph derived from SEC 10-K filings. > a benchmark of 15,600 qualitative and quantitative questions, grounded in FinReflectKG, a temporally indexed financial knowledge graph derived from SEC 10-K filings - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02906) ## Source-stated The authors vary the presentation of the same underlying evidence to test whether reasoning LLMs' performance depends on evidence structure. > hold each question's underlying evidence constant while varying only its presentation - embedding it in noisy surrounding context or changing its order - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02906) ## Source-stated The authors report consistently lower judged correctness under less-structured presentations, most sharply for quantitative cross-company reasoning and 3-hop branch motifs. > judged correctness remains consistently lower under less-structured presentations of the same evidence - most sharply for quantitative cross-company reasoning and 3-hop branch motifs - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02906) ## Source-stated The authors say KG-linked presentation uses fewer input tokens by design. > KG-linked presentation also uses fewer input tokens by design. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02906) ## Source-stated The paper releases the benchmark, provenance annotations, model outputs, evaluation records and supporting technical documentation. > We release the benchmark, provenance annotations, model outputs, evaluation records, and supporting technical documentation. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02906) ## Source and contributor context Arun, Abhinav, Harsh, Reetu Raj, Sarmah, Bhaskarjit, Pasquali, Stefano · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## Benchmark A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected. - [Definition reference](https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09110) ## Large language model A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#large-language-model) ## Model tokens Small chunks of text, often parts of words, that a language model reads and writes; usage and prices are often counted in tokens. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#token) ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: e8ef0851-3953-4e91-8471-b58061e9f114. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-08T05:18:51.115Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: 20097dcdefcdbf92533f1a0b09cc54c406176632a63e6740c31ff07560bb52a8. Source text hash: 8e1e744e32a236ab7c81ef19401ef88b0f2c9e641d30f2e36b600ce4b5d729cc. ### uncertain — 2026-11-08T05:18:51.115Z — anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 Publication: e8ef0851-3953-4e91-8471-b58061e9f114 attribution — pass: The reading attributes the benchmark, experiments and conclusions to the paper's authors on arXiv. It frames the results as reported findings rather than established facts. > Authors:Abhinav Arun, Reetu Raj Harsh, Bhaskarjit Sarmah, Stefano Pasquali summary — uncertain: The main idea is faithful: the same evidence, presented differently, produced lower judged correctness when it was less structured. A non-specialist may still get lost in two places. First, 'KG-linked presentation' never expands KG or says how it differs from the other presentations. Second, 'less-structured presentations' is not explained as embedding the evidence in noisy surrounding context or changing its order, which is the core mechanism. Smallest repair: say what the presentations vary, and add term-library tooltips for knowledge graph (KG), 3-hop branch motifs, input tokens, reasoning LLMs and SEC 10-K filings. > embedding it in noisy surrounding context or changing its order date — pass: originalPublished 2025-10-03 matches the v1 submission date. The 2026 v2 revision and the feed date are correctly not used. > Submitted on 3 Oct 2025 (v1), last revised 4 Nov 2026 (this version, v2) support — pass: Every claim is directly supported by the abstract, with exact excerpts. The draft's closing caveat about generalization is labeled as a limit of the abstract and adds no unsupported claim. The question asks about an unresolved detail (the six presentations) that the evidence raises. > using six such presentations, we test whether reasoning LLMs' performance depends on evidence structure media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper, which is the most direct access to the source. ## Recorded references Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter. No public references recorded here yet. [Reference data (JSON)](/readings/9e714f3c453f6142ff9d802d1464f14eb1a4d2f7139a1e1d8a976014e525635f/references.json) ## Corrections and challenges [Send a correction or an opposing source](https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/) [JSON record](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-finmultihopqa-tests-how-evidence-structure-affects-9e714f3c.json)