# arXiv: Leaving, Staying, or Living There? Duration Commonsense Reasoning with Human-LLM Co-annotations

[Canonical reading](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-leaving-staying-or-living-there-duration-commonsense-64d04b2d)

Chenyang Yu, Zhaomin Xiao, Yan Huang and Eduardo Blanco’s arXiv paper asks whether vision-language models can infer how long someone stays in a place from geotagged tweets. Gardening in a backyard implies living there; checking into an Airbnb more likely means staying for a few days. The contrast illustrates the paper’s central difficulty: social media rarely states duration explicitly, so models must infer it from noisy textual, visual and contextual cues. The authors create a corpus of geotagged tweets co-annotated by humans and LLMs as a testbed for this task. They report that state-of-the-art models struggle with duration inference even when guided by multi-turn Chain-of-Thought prompting. Their error analysis points to two ways models go wrong: they miss critical contextual information, or give prominent visual details too much weight while overlooking subtle hashtags and semantic nuances. The authors frame duration judgments as important for understanding human mobility, travel behavior and social context, and describe context-aware multimodal understanding as a continuing challenge. The supplied abstract does not include the corpus size, model identities or evaluation scores, so the scale and breadth of the reported difficulty remain unclear.

Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.

## Original source

arXiv cs.AI · Article

Original source date: Oct 28, 2026 (2026-10-28).

Date basis: Date basis not provided.

Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-13T06:46:25.480Z. First observed: 2026-10-30T06:45:34.503Z. Retrieved: 2026-10-31T07:03:53.741Z.

- [Leaving, Staying, or Living There? Duration Commonsense Reasoning with Human-LLM Co-annotations](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38755)

## Limits

The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract, not the full paper; it does not provide corpus size, model identities, evaluation scores or details of the annotation procedure. The authors describe their findings as applying to the models and testbed studied; the abstract does not establish how broadly they generalize.


## Open question

What corpus size and evaluation results underlie the authors’ finding that state-of-the-art models struggle with duration inference?


## Source-stated

The authors say duration is often unstated in social media and must be inferred from noisy textual, visual and contextual cues.

> duration is rarely stated explicitly in social media posts and must instead be inferred from noisy textual, visual, and contextual cues.

- [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38755)

## Source-stated

The authors created a corpus of geotagged tweets annotated jointly by humans and LLMs for evaluating duration inference.

> We create a new corpus of geotagged tweets co-annotated by humans and LLMs to serve as a testbed for this task.

- [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38755)

## Source-stated

The authors report that state-of-the-art models struggle with duration inference, including when guided by multi-turn Chain-of-Thought prompting.

> We find that state-of-the-art models struggle with duration inference, even when guided by multi-turn Chain-of-Thought prompting.

- [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38755)

## Source-stated

The authors’ error analysis identifies missed context and overreliance on prominent visual details, at the expense of subtle hashtags and semantic nuances.

> models often fail to integrate critical contextual information, or they overly rely on prominent visual details while overlooking subtle hashtags and semantic nuances.

- [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38755)

## Source-stated

The paper frames duration judgments as relevant to understanding human mobility, travel behavior and social context.

> Such duration judgments are important for understanding human mobility, travel behavior, and social context.

- [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38755)

## Source and contributor context

Yu, Chenyang, Xiao, Zhaomin, Huang, Yan, Blanco, Eduardo · Article author

These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.


## Source media

No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.


## Terms and references

Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.


## Large language model

A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.

- [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#large-language-model)

## Chain of thought

The step-by-step working a model writes out before giving its final answer.

- [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#chain-of-thought-prompting)

## Multimodal model

A model that works with more than one kind of input or output, such as text, images and audio.

- [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#multimodal-model)

## arXiv

arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.

- [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv)
- [Reference](https://arxiv.org/)
- [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html)

## Editorial provenance

Version 1. Publication ID: 91ec8015-afb2-403f-88c6-99322f0a2ede.

Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.

Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-13T06:46:25.480Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.

Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development.

Observation: 656ee8fd2ed4e48d640f6f7daafd6240cb6752c2895c7e7739c48d5bdd6c69c1. Source text hash: 6a773d2d9b60e04cdb6168b3aa9b0725078cfab28fb3e2d8cd53f28945be9c98.


## Revision and source-check history

### Version 1 — 2026-11-13T06:46:25.480Z

Chenyang Yu, Zhaomin Xiao, Yan Huang and Eduardo Blanco’s arXiv paper asks whether vision-language models can infer how long someone stays in a place from geotagged tweets. Gardening in a backyard implies living there; checking into an Airbnb more likely means staying for a few days. The contrast illustrates the paper’s central difficulty: social media rarely states duration explicitly, so models must infer it from noisy textual, visual and contextual cues. The authors create a corpus of geotagged tweets co-annotated by humans and LLMs as a testbed for this task. They report that state-of-the-art models struggle with duration inference even when guided by multi-turn Chain-of-Thought prompting. Their error analysis points to two ways models go wrong: they miss critical contextual information, or give prominent visual details too much weight while overlooking subtle hashtags and semantic nuances. The authors frame duration judgments as important for understanding human mobility, travel behavior and social context, and describe context-aware multimodal understanding as a continuing challenge. The supplied abstract does not include the corpus size, model identities or evaluation scores, so the scale and breadth of the reported difficulty remain unclear.

## Original source

arXiv cs.AI · Article

Original source date: Oct 28, 2026 (2026-10-28).

Date basis: Date basis not provided.

Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-13T06:46:25.480Z. First observed: 2026-10-30T06:45:34.503Z. Retrieved: 2026-10-31T07:03:53.741Z.

- [Leaving, Staying, or Living There? Duration Commonsense Reasoning with Human-LLM Co-annotations](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38755)

## Limits

The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract, not the full paper; it does not provide corpus size, model identities, evaluation scores or details of the annotation procedure. The authors describe their findings as applying to the models and testbed studied; the abstract does not establish how broadly they generalize.


## Open question

What corpus size and evaluation results underlie the authors’ finding that state-of-the-art models struggle with duration inference?


## Source-stated

The authors say duration is often unstated in social media and must be inferred from noisy textual, visual and contextual cues.

> duration is rarely stated explicitly in social media posts and must instead be inferred from noisy textual, visual, and contextual cues.

- [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38755)

## Source-stated

The authors created a corpus of geotagged tweets annotated jointly by humans and LLMs for evaluating duration inference.

> We create a new corpus of geotagged tweets co-annotated by humans and LLMs to serve as a testbed for this task.

- [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38755)

## Source-stated

The authors report that state-of-the-art models struggle with duration inference, including when guided by multi-turn Chain-of-Thought prompting.

> We find that state-of-the-art models struggle with duration inference, even when guided by multi-turn Chain-of-Thought prompting.

- [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38755)

## Source-stated

The authors’ error analysis identifies missed context and overreliance on prominent visual details, at the expense of subtle hashtags and semantic nuances.

> models often fail to integrate critical contextual information, or they overly rely on prominent visual details while overlooking subtle hashtags and semantic nuances.

- [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38755)

## Source-stated

The paper frames duration judgments as relevant to understanding human mobility, travel behavior and social context.

> Such duration judgments are important for understanding human mobility, travel behavior, and social context.

- [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38755)

## Source and contributor context

Yu, Chenyang, Xiao, Zhaomin, Huang, Yan, Blanco, Eduardo · Article author

These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.


## Source media

No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.


## Terms and references

Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.


## Large language model

A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.

- [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#large-language-model)

## Chain of thought

The step-by-step working a model writes out before giving its final answer.

- [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#chain-of-thought-prompting)

## Multimodal model

A model that works with more than one kind of input or output, such as text, images and audio.

- [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#multimodal-model)

## arXiv

arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.

- [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv)
- [Reference](https://arxiv.org/)
- [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html)

## Editorial provenance

Version 1. Publication ID: 91ec8015-afb2-403f-88c6-99322f0a2ede.

Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.

Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-13T06:46:25.480Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.

Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development.

Observation: 656ee8fd2ed4e48d640f6f7daafd6240cb6752c2895c7e7739c48d5bdd6c69c1. Source text hash: 6a773d2d9b60e04cdb6168b3aa9b0725078cfab28fb3e2d8cd53f28945be9c98.


### uncertain — 2026-11-13T06:46:25.480Z — anthropic/claude-opus-5.5

Publication: 91ec8015-afb2-403f-88c6-99322f0a2ede

attribution — pass: The draft correctly attributes the paper to Chenyang Yu, Zhaomin Xiao, Yan Huang and Eduardo Blanco on arXiv. It frames the findings as the authors' reports rather than established facts.

> Authors:Chenyang Yu, Zhaomin Xiao, Yan Huang, Eduardo Blanco

summary — pass: The summary is clear and faithful. It explains the task with the source's own gardening and Airbnb example and states the corpus, the reported struggle and both error modes. It notes the gaps in the abstract and keeps the question on a real unresolved issue. Terms such as vision-language models and Chain-of-Thought prompting are kept exactly and suit term-library tooltips. The surrounding text conveys enough meaning for a general reader.

> In this paper, we investigate whether vision-language models possess such duration commonsense.

date — pass: The originalPublished date of 2026-10-28 matches the v1 submission date on the arXiv page. The 2026-10-31 feed date is a later announcement.

> \[Submitted on 28 Oct 2026\]

support — uncertain: All five claims match the abstract verbatim. One limitation says the authors describe their findings as applying only to the models and testbed studied, but the abstract contains no such scoping statement. The abstract instead draws a broader conclusion about remaining challenges in context-aware multimodal understanding. Smallest repair: reword the limitation as an Escape Meridian caveat, for example 'The abstract does not establish how broadly the findings generalize beyond the models and testbed studied,' rather than attributing the scoping to the authors.

> These findings underscore the significant challenges remaining in context-aware multimodal understanding.

media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper, the original source.

## Recorded references

Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter.

No public references recorded here yet.

[Reference data (JSON)](/readings/64d04b2db52bdab0467635d80d9ac13b097145279af5ac4f798a567fda0fd6a2/references.json)

## Corrections and challenges

[Send a correction or an opposing source](https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/)

[JSON record](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-leaving-staying-or-living-there-duration-commonsense-64d04b2d.json)
