# arXiv: Mandaokar and Rinner test RADAR-based obstacle avoidance on small quadrotors [Canonical reading](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-mandaokar-and-rinner-test-radar-based-obstacle-avoidance-060db78e) In their preprint, Dnyandeep Mandaokar and Bernhard Rinner present what they describe as the first mmWave RADAR-based perception-and-control system for fast onboard dynamic obstacle avoidance. The system combines an interacting multiple models (IMM) tracker, which tracks moving objects, with a control-barrier functions (CBF) controller that outputs evasive accelerations. Their central engineering problem is timing: a quadrotor must detect an obstacle, estimate its motion, and command a maneuver before the available distance runs out. The authors derive conditions linking sensing range, relative speed and control delay, and include tracker and trigger decision latency in their per-trial analysis. On a Raspberry Pi 4B, they report approximately 14ms processing latency per RADAR frame and 75ms from first detection to avoidance command. In experiments, the system avoided obstacles in all 20 tethered indoor flights and all 39 untethered outdoor maneuvers. Those trials involved three ball sizes, hover and forward flight, and measured closing speeds up to 14.6m/s. Escape Meridian interpretation: these results indicate a working onboard system in the reported conditions, but do not establish performance across all obstacles or flight environments. The authors identify the paper as a preprint under review. Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims. ## Original source arXiv eess.SY · Article Original source date: Aug 3, 2026 (2026-08-03). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-09T05:01:42.520Z. First observed: 2026-11-09T05:00:38.140Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-09T05:00:44.527Z. - [RADAR Perception for Dynamic Obstacle Avoidance onboard small-scale Quadrotor UAVs](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01855) ## Limits The authors describe the work as a preprint submitted for possible publication and currently under review. The reported avoidance flights used three ball sizes; the supplied abstract does not establish performance with other obstacle types. The evidence is the abstract, which reports experiment outcomes but does not provide the full experimental methodology or results. ## Open question How does the system perform with obstacles beyond the three ball sizes described in the preprint? ## Source-stated The authors present a mmWave RADAR-based perception-and-control system for fast onboard dynamic obstacle avoidance, combining an IMM tracker and CBF controller. > Our computationally efficient system combines a lightweight interacting multiple models (IMM) tracker with a control-barrier functions (CBF) controller that directly outputs evasive accelerations. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01855) ## Source-stated The authors derive avoidance conditions involving sensing range, relative speed and control delay, and assess tracker and trigger decision latency per trial. > We derive and analyze latency and spatial bounds that relate sensing range, relative speed, and control delay, yielding sufficient conditions for successful avoidance. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01855) ## Source-stated On a Raspberry Pi 4B, the system had approximately 14ms per RADAR frame processing latency and 75ms system latency from first detection to avoidance command. > An onboard implementation on a Raspberry Pi 4B demonstrates real-time feasibility with an end-to-end processing latency of approximately 14ms per RADAR frame and a system latency of 75ms from first detection to the avoidance command. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01855) ## Source-stated The authors report successful obstacle avoidance in all tested tethered indoor flights and untethered outdoor maneuvers. > The UAV successfully avoided obstacles in all 20 tethered indoor flights and all 39 untethered outdoor avoidance maneuvers across three ball sizes - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01855) ## Source-stated The reported flight trials included forward flight up to 5m/s and measured closing speeds up to 14.6m/s. > during both hover and forward flights at up to 5m/s with measured closing speeds up to 14.6m/s. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01855) ## Escape Meridian interpretation The reported successful trials demonstrate performance under the described test conditions; they do not establish performance for other obstacle types or environments. > across three ball sizes, during both hover and forward flights at up to 5m/s - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01855) ## Source and contributor context Mandaokar, Dnyandeep, Rinner, Bernhard · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## Latency The delay between sending a request and receiving the result. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#latency) ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: cec7ea75-bf96-47ca-8bf4-edd9e9beb094. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-09T05:01:42.520Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: 7e0b755301c15ef6a22875a87f9dc2fb4ded26603b5cd0e0b66b77b0d67f73d8. Source text hash: da92a10c50ed47df1a538f9994836d23ffb31db1664e8311174f8c63f290aaef. ## Revision and source-check history ### Version 1 — 2026-11-09T05:01:42.520Z In their preprint, Dnyandeep Mandaokar and Bernhard Rinner present what they describe as the first mmWave RADAR-based perception-and-control system for fast onboard dynamic obstacle avoidance. The system combines an interacting multiple models (IMM) tracker, which tracks moving objects, with a control-barrier functions (CBF) controller that outputs evasive accelerations. Their central engineering problem is timing: a quadrotor must detect an obstacle, estimate its motion, and command a maneuver before the available distance runs out. The authors derive conditions linking sensing range, relative speed and control delay, and include tracker and trigger decision latency in their per-trial analysis. On a Raspberry Pi 4B, they report approximately 14ms processing latency per RADAR frame and 75ms from first detection to avoidance command. In experiments, the system avoided obstacles in all 20 tethered indoor flights and all 39 untethered outdoor maneuvers. Those trials involved three ball sizes, hover and forward flight, and measured closing speeds up to 14.6m/s. Escape Meridian interpretation: these results indicate a working onboard system in the reported conditions, but do not establish performance across all obstacles or flight environments. The authors identify the paper as a preprint under review. ## Original source arXiv eess.SY · Article Original source date: Aug 3, 2026 (2026-08-03). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-09T05:01:42.520Z. First observed: 2026-11-09T05:00:38.140Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-09T05:00:44.527Z. - [RADAR Perception for Dynamic Obstacle Avoidance onboard small-scale Quadrotor UAVs](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01855) ## Limits The authors describe the work as a preprint submitted for possible publication and currently under review. The reported avoidance flights used three ball sizes; the supplied abstract does not establish performance with other obstacle types. The evidence is the abstract, which reports experiment outcomes but does not provide the full experimental methodology or results. ## Open question How does the system perform with obstacles beyond the three ball sizes described in the preprint? ## Source-stated The authors present a mmWave RADAR-based perception-and-control system for fast onboard dynamic obstacle avoidance, combining an IMM tracker and CBF controller. > Our computationally efficient system combines a lightweight interacting multiple models (IMM) tracker with a control-barrier functions (CBF) controller that directly outputs evasive accelerations. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01855) ## Source-stated The authors derive avoidance conditions involving sensing range, relative speed and control delay, and assess tracker and trigger decision latency per trial. > We derive and analyze latency and spatial bounds that relate sensing range, relative speed, and control delay, yielding sufficient conditions for successful avoidance. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01855) ## Source-stated On a Raspberry Pi 4B, the system had approximately 14ms per RADAR frame processing latency and 75ms system latency from first detection to avoidance command. > An onboard implementation on a Raspberry Pi 4B demonstrates real-time feasibility with an end-to-end processing latency of approximately 14ms per RADAR frame and a system latency of 75ms from first detection to the avoidance command. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01855) ## Source-stated The authors report successful obstacle avoidance in all tested tethered indoor flights and untethered outdoor maneuvers. > The UAV successfully avoided obstacles in all 20 tethered indoor flights and all 39 untethered outdoor avoidance maneuvers across three ball sizes - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01855) ## Source-stated The reported flight trials included forward flight up to 5m/s and measured closing speeds up to 14.6m/s. > during both hover and forward flights at up to 5m/s with measured closing speeds up to 14.6m/s. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01855) ## Escape Meridian interpretation The reported successful trials demonstrate performance under the described test conditions; they do not establish performance for other obstacle types or environments. > across three ball sizes, during both hover and forward flights at up to 5m/s - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01855) ## Source and contributor context Mandaokar, Dnyandeep, Rinner, Bernhard · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## Latency The delay between sending a request and receiving the result. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#latency) ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: cec7ea75-bf96-47ca-8bf4-edd9e9beb094. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-09T05:01:42.520Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: 7e0b755301c15ef6a22875a87f9dc2fb4ded26603b5cd0e0b66b77b0d67f73d8. Source text hash: da92a10c50ed47df1a538f9994836d23ffb31db1664e8311174f8c63f290aaef. ### uncertain — 2026-11-09T05:01:42.520Z — anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 Publication: cec7ea75-bf96-47ca-8bf4-edd9e9beb094 attribution — pass: The reading correctly attributes the work to Dnyandeep Mandaokar and Bernhard Rinner. The 'first' claim is hedged as what they describe, matching the source's 'to the best of our knowledge.' It also correctly reports the preprint and under-review status. > Authors:Dnyandeep Mandaokar, Bernhard Rinner summary — uncertain: The summary is accurate but omits the perception results tied to RADAR's apparent purpose: 300 throw experiments in light and dark, plus 90 in smoke. Without them, a general reader is not told why mmWave RADAR matters here, and mmWave is not explained. Smallest repair: add one attributed sentence reporting these tracking tests across visibility conditions, with mean position errors of at most 0.15 m, 0.93 m and 0.87 m by axis. Also add a term-library tooltip for mmWave RADAR. > In 300 throw experiments spanning three object sizes and varying visibility (light and dark), it achieves mean position errors of at most 0.15 m, 0.93m, and 0.87m in the x, y, and z directions, with a similar spread in 90 experiments in smoke. date — pass: The originalPublished date, 2026-08-03, matches the v1 submission date. It does not use the 6 Nov 2026 v2 revision or the November feed date. > \[Submitted on 3 Aug 2026 (v1), last revised 6 Nov 2026 (this version, v2)\] support — pass: All factual claims match the abstract, including latencies, flight counts, speeds and ball sizes. The interpretation is labeled as Escape Meridian's, stays conditional and does not overstate real-world reliability. The question follows from the three-ball-size scope without implying an answer. > The UAV successfully avoided obstacles in all 20 tethered indoor flights and all 39 untethered outdoor avoidance maneuvers across three ball sizes media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper. It is the most direct access to the source. ## Recorded references Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter. No public references recorded here yet. [Reference data (JSON)](/readings/060db78eca4fced057628a5740f58c2046032fbdae16ea8f2ff870dedd3dad7a/references.json) ## Corrections and challenges [Send a correction or an opposing source](https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/) [JSON record](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-mandaokar-and-rinner-test-radar-based-obstacle-avoidance-060db78e.json)