# arXiv study: Who Should Know What? Information sharing changes LLM market outcomes [Canonical reading](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-study-who-should-know-what-information-sharing-changes-f7e3e0c5) The authors of “Who Should Know What? Empirical Information Design for Multi-Agent LLM Economies” argue that giving AI agents more detailed information does not reliably improve collective outcomes. Their experiments compare disclosure policies while keeping interaction rules and models fixed, across multi-resource trade, bilateral bargaining, and double auctions. The effects vary by model and setting: exact valuations reduce GPT-6 Sol’s realized gains in trade but increase them for Claude Sonnet 5; exact information leads to less balanced agreements from Grok 4.7 but symmetric divisions from Claude Opus 5.5. In double auctions, the authors report that full disclosure inflates price demands, triggers market breakdown, and lowers welfare for three tested models. Their central implication is that model choice and information design should be co-optimized, rather than assuming transparency helps every system. The findings concern these experiments; the abstract does not establish how the results transfer to other settings. Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims. ## Original source arXiv cs.AI · Article Original source date: Nov 5, 2026 (2026-11-05). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-09T02:24:51.094Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:12:43.461Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-09T02:24:09.306Z. - [Who Should Know What? Empirical Information Design for Multi-Agent LLM Economies](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07667) ## Limits The abstract describes experiments in multi-resource trade, bilateral bargaining, and double auctions; it does not establish whether the reported effects transfer to other settings. The source is an arXiv abstract and does not provide the experimental details needed here to assess how the reported outcomes were measured beyond its mention of ground-truth utilities. ## Open question Would the model-dependent effects the authors report persist under different interaction rules or in settings beyond the three markets they tested? ## Source-stated The authors introduce an experimental framework that compares information disclosure policies across LLM-agent markets while keeping interaction rules and models fixed. > we introduce empirical information design, an experimental framework that systematically compares disclosure policies across economic markets populated by LLM agents, while holding interaction rules and models fixed. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07667) ## Source-stated The authors report that finer disclosure has model-dependent effects in multi-resource trade: it reduces realized gains for GPT-6 Sol but increases them for Claude Sonnet 5. > In trade, revealing exact valuations rather than ordinal preference rankings reduces realized gains for GPT-6 Sol (from 98% to 91% of maximum) yet increases them for Claude Sonnet 5 (from 72% to 86%). - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07667) ## Source-stated In bargaining, the authors report different outcomes for two models: Grok 4.7 produces less balanced agreements with exact information, while Claude Opus 5.5 divides gains symmetrically. > In bargaining, exact information leads Grok 4.7 to produce less balanced agreements, whereas Claude Opus 5.5 divides gains symmetrically. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07667) ## Source-stated The authors report that full disclosure in double auctions inflates price demands, triggers market breakdown, and lowers welfare for three tested models. > In double auctions, full disclosure inflates price demands, triggering market breakdown and lowering welfare for Gemini 3.1 Pro (97% to 78%), Claude Opus 5.5 (94% to 64%), and Grok 4.7 (97% to 62%). - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07667) ## Source-stated The authors conclude that model selection and information design should be co-optimized because models differ in their strategic responses to information. > Overall, these results suggest that model selection and information design must be co-optimized, as LLMs vary in how their strategic responses to information impact system objectives. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07667) ## Source and contributor context Erdogan, Mete, Suzgun, Mirac, Pappu, Aneesh, Xu, Guowei, El, Batu, Schoen, Andrew A., Huang, Furong, Dickerson, John P., Pilanci, Mert, Zou, James · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## Large language model A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#large-language-model) ## AI agent An AI system that chooses and carries out actions toward a goal, often using software tools. - [Definition reference](https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/ai-agents) ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## GPT-6 Sol GPT-6 Sol is an OpenAI model announced on September 22, 2026 as a lower-cost tier trained with methods similar to Astra. - [Explore this context](/entities/gpt-6-sol) - [Reference](https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-6-sol-and-luna) ## Claude Claude is Anthropic’s family of AI models and assistants for tasks such as writing, analysis and coding. - [Explore this context](/entities/claude) - [Reference](https://claude.com/product/overview) - [Reference](https://www.anthropic.com/news) - [Reference](https://www.anthropic.com/research/team/economics) ## Grok Grok is a family of AI models from xAI, with capability claims and evaluations published by its developer. - [Explore this context](/entities/grok) - [Reference](https://x.ai/grok) - [Reference](https://x.ai/news/grok-4-7) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: dd674c66-997a-4826-849b-9a4214998b07. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-09T02:24:51.094Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: ffb7fbf95909ca496231028eaea339fb79cc02f88c0220ecd02d1cb287181b82. Source text hash: d895a745360033395dc1d15cac28cf97458d766d3398589e89d608e05f03bcd4. ## Revision and source-check history ### Version 1 — 2026-11-09T02:24:51.094Z The authors of “Who Should Know What? Empirical Information Design for Multi-Agent LLM Economies” argue that giving AI agents more detailed information does not reliably improve collective outcomes. Their experiments compare disclosure policies while keeping interaction rules and models fixed, across multi-resource trade, bilateral bargaining, and double auctions. The effects vary by model and setting: exact valuations reduce GPT-6 Sol’s realized gains in trade but increase them for Claude Sonnet 5; exact information leads to less balanced agreements from Grok 4.7 but symmetric divisions from Claude Opus 5.5. In double auctions, the authors report that full disclosure inflates price demands, triggers market breakdown, and lowers welfare for three tested models. Their central implication is that model choice and information design should be co-optimized, rather than assuming transparency helps every system. The findings concern these experiments; the abstract does not establish how the results transfer to other settings. ## Original source arXiv cs.AI · Article Original source date: Nov 5, 2026 (2026-11-05). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-09T02:24:51.094Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:12:43.461Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-09T02:24:09.306Z. - [Who Should Know What? Empirical Information Design for Multi-Agent LLM Economies](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07667) ## Limits The abstract describes experiments in multi-resource trade, bilateral bargaining, and double auctions; it does not establish whether the reported effects transfer to other settings. The source is an arXiv abstract and does not provide the experimental details needed here to assess how the reported outcomes were measured beyond its mention of ground-truth utilities. ## Open question Would the model-dependent effects the authors report persist under different interaction rules or in settings beyond the three markets they tested? ## Source-stated The authors introduce an experimental framework that compares information disclosure policies across LLM-agent markets while keeping interaction rules and models fixed. > we introduce empirical information design, an experimental framework that systematically compares disclosure policies across economic markets populated by LLM agents, while holding interaction rules and models fixed. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07667) ## Source-stated The authors report that finer disclosure has model-dependent effects in multi-resource trade: it reduces realized gains for GPT-6 Sol but increases them for Claude Sonnet 5. > In trade, revealing exact valuations rather than ordinal preference rankings reduces realized gains for GPT-6 Sol (from 98% to 91% of maximum) yet increases them for Claude Sonnet 5 (from 72% to 86%). - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07667) ## Source-stated In bargaining, the authors report different outcomes for two models: Grok 4.7 produces less balanced agreements with exact information, while Claude Opus 5.5 divides gains symmetrically. > In bargaining, exact information leads Grok 4.7 to produce less balanced agreements, whereas Claude Opus 5.5 divides gains symmetrically. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07667) ## Source-stated The authors report that full disclosure in double auctions inflates price demands, triggers market breakdown, and lowers welfare for three tested models. > In double auctions, full disclosure inflates price demands, triggering market breakdown and lowering welfare for Gemini 3.1 Pro (97% to 78%), Claude Opus 5.5 (94% to 64%), and Grok 4.7 (97% to 62%). - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07667) ## Source-stated The authors conclude that model selection and information design should be co-optimized because models differ in their strategic responses to information. > Overall, these results suggest that model selection and information design must be co-optimized, as LLMs vary in how their strategic responses to information impact system objectives. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07667) ## Source and contributor context Erdogan, Mete, Suzgun, Mirac, Pappu, Aneesh, Xu, Guowei, El, Batu, Schoen, Andrew A., Huang, Furong, Dickerson, John P., Pilanci, Mert, Zou, James · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## Large language model A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#large-language-model) ## AI agent An AI system that chooses and carries out actions toward a goal, often using software tools. - [Definition reference](https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/ai-agents) ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## GPT-6 Sol GPT-6 Sol is an OpenAI model announced on September 22, 2026 as a lower-cost tier trained with methods similar to Astra. - [Explore this context](/entities/gpt-6-sol) - [Reference](https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-6-sol-and-luna) ## Claude Claude is Anthropic’s family of AI models and assistants for tasks such as writing, analysis and coding. - [Explore this context](/entities/claude) - [Reference](https://claude.com/product/overview) - [Reference](https://www.anthropic.com/news) - [Reference](https://www.anthropic.com/research/team/economics) ## Grok Grok is a family of AI models from xAI, with capability claims and evaluations published by its developer. - [Explore this context](/entities/grok) - [Reference](https://x.ai/grok) - [Reference](https://x.ai/news/grok-4-7) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: dd674c66-997a-4826-849b-9a4214998b07. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-09T02:24:51.094Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: ffb7fbf95909ca496231028eaea339fb79cc02f88c0220ecd02d1cb287181b82. Source text hash: d895a745360033395dc1d15cac28cf97458d766d3398589e89d608e05f03bcd4. ### passed — 2026-11-09T02:24:51.094Z — anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 Publication: dd674c66-997a-4826-849b-9a4214998b07 attribution — pass: The reading consistently attributes the framework, findings and conclusion to the paper's authors on arXiv. It uses phrases such as 'the authors report' and 'their central implication,' and does not present the results as established fact or as Escape Meridian's view. > Authors:Mete Erdogan, Mirac Suzgun, Aneesh Pappu, Guowei Xu, Batu El, Andrew A. Schoen, Furong Huang, John P. Dickerson, Mert Pilanci, James Zou summary — pass: The reading leads with the authors' finding that more detailed information does not reliably improve outcomes. It preserves the model-dependent contrasts and the co-optimization conclusion, and its question follows from the stated scope. Terms such as double auctions, welfare and co-optimized are kept exact; per the Spock Test they belong in term-library tooltips, so suggest additions if missing. Optional fidelity touch: mention that ten frontier LLMs were evaluated. > We find that finer information disclosure yields highly model-dependent results. date — pass: The originalPublished value is 2026-11-05. It matches the arXiv submission date for v1, not the later feed date of November 6. > Thu, 5 Nov 2026 08:51:37 UTC (648 KB) support — pass: Each claim matches the abstract verbatim in substance, with no exaggeration. The stated limitations are appropriately bounded, and the reading does not imply benefits, costs or real-world reliability beyond the experiments. The phrase 'should be co-optimized' slightly softens the source's 'must,' but the claim is still framed as the authors' suggestion, so this is not material. > Overall, these results suggest that model selection and information design must be co-optimized, as LLMs vary in how their strategic responses to information impact system objectives. media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct link to the original arXiv abstract page. It is the most direct way to access the source. ## Recorded references Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter. No public references recorded here yet. [Reference data (JSON)](/readings/f7e3e0c56393e28da7f40c796e44abe181753f99c4644b2eec2f8d49562c27ae/references.json) ## Corrections and challenges [Send a correction or an opposing source](https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/) [JSON record](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-study-who-should-know-what-information-sharing-changes-f7e3e0c5.json)