# arXiv: Why the authors say hourly carbon signals miss data-center ramps [Canonical reading](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-why-the-authors-say-hourly-carbon-signals-miss-data-532b8236) Xiaoying Shi and Jinyue Yan argue that one hourly carbon value can misrepresent a data center’s emissions when its electricity use rises or falls sharply. They compute directional carbon intensity—the emission caused or avoided per megawatt-hour of a finite upward or downward ramp—for every hour of 2025 on the PJM Interconnection’s fossil fleet. They report that the locational marginal emission rate (LME) misstates a 1 GW ramp by more than 10% in 60% to 83% of hours in eleven months. Upward and downward ramps differ in a quarter to three quarters of hours, even though they agree on their monthly mean. The authors also report that location-based reporting assigns 47% to 59% of a ramp’s emission to other consumers. They recommend that a campus schedule against the signal for its ramp’s size and direction, and report the emission it causes. The supplied evidence is the abstract, so it does not show the paper’s full methods or supporting analysis. Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims. ## Original source arXiv eess.SY · Article Original source date: Nov 9, 2026 (2026-11-09). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-10T21:17:39.312Z. First observed: 2026-11-10T08:33:48.594Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-10T21:16:39.204Z. - [One number per hour is not enough: directional carbon intensity of data-center ramps on the PJM fleet](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.12056) ## Limits The supplied evidence is the abstract, not the paper’s full methods or supporting analysis. The reported results concern the 2025 PJM Interconnection fossil fleet; the abstract does not establish whether they apply to other fleets or periods. ## Open question Do the reported differences hold beyond the 2025 PJM fossil fleet analyzed by the authors? ## Source-stated The authors calculate directional carbon intensity for finite upward or downward ramps across every hour of 2025 on the PJM Interconnection’s fossil fleet. > We compute the directional carbon intensity, the emission caused or avoided per megawatt-hour of a finite upward or downward ramp, for every hour of 2025 on the PJM Interconnection's fossil fleet - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.12056) ## Source-stated The authors report that the LME misstates a 1 GW ramp by more than 10% in 60% to 83% of hours in eleven months. > The LME misstates a 1 GW ramp by more than 10% in 60% to 83% of hours in eleven months. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.12056) ## Source-stated The authors report that upward and downward ramps differ in many hours but agree on their monthly mean. > Upward and downward ramps differ in a quarter to three quarters of hours but agree on their monthly mean. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.12056) ## Source-stated The authors say location-based reporting assigns a substantial share of a ramp’s emissions to other consumers, and recommend scheduling and reporting based on the campus’s ramp. > Location-based reporting assigns 47% to 59% of a ramp's emission to other consumers. A campus should schedule on the signal for its ramp's size and direction and report the emission it causes. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.12056) ## Source and contributor context Shi, Xiaoying, Yan, Jinyue · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## Megawatt A unit of power equal to a million watts. - [Definition reference](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watt) ## Gigawatt A unit of power equal to a billion watts, roughly the output of a large power plant. - [Definition reference](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watt) ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: 433c73fe-5118-45cf-85f1-9565485b441d. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-10T21:17:39.312Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: 0c0322fc389927c4776a203fc85dcd2fcc38617d65674cbc2044dd70eabfb4bb. Source text hash: 9b15ff36bbf5a9e1705a2126383005839a53ac68ef9857a42f1a49b7640ead8a. ## Revision and source-check history ### Version 1 — 2026-11-10T21:17:39.312Z Xiaoying Shi and Jinyue Yan argue that one hourly carbon value can misrepresent a data center’s emissions when its electricity use rises or falls sharply. They compute directional carbon intensity—the emission caused or avoided per megawatt-hour of a finite upward or downward ramp—for every hour of 2025 on the PJM Interconnection’s fossil fleet. They report that the locational marginal emission rate (LME) misstates a 1 GW ramp by more than 10% in 60% to 83% of hours in eleven months. Upward and downward ramps differ in a quarter to three quarters of hours, even though they agree on their monthly mean. The authors also report that location-based reporting assigns 47% to 59% of a ramp’s emission to other consumers. They recommend that a campus schedule against the signal for its ramp’s size and direction, and report the emission it causes. The supplied evidence is the abstract, so it does not show the paper’s full methods or supporting analysis. ## Original source arXiv eess.SY · Article Original source date: Nov 9, 2026 (2026-11-09). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-10T21:17:39.312Z. First observed: 2026-11-10T08:33:48.594Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-10T21:16:39.204Z. - [One number per hour is not enough: directional carbon intensity of data-center ramps on the PJM fleet](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.12056) ## Limits The supplied evidence is the abstract, not the paper’s full methods or supporting analysis. The reported results concern the 2025 PJM Interconnection fossil fleet; the abstract does not establish whether they apply to other fleets or periods. ## Open question Do the reported differences hold beyond the 2025 PJM fossil fleet analyzed by the authors? ## Source-stated The authors calculate directional carbon intensity for finite upward or downward ramps across every hour of 2025 on the PJM Interconnection’s fossil fleet. > We compute the directional carbon intensity, the emission caused or avoided per megawatt-hour of a finite upward or downward ramp, for every hour of 2025 on the PJM Interconnection's fossil fleet - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.12056) ## Source-stated The authors report that the LME misstates a 1 GW ramp by more than 10% in 60% to 83% of hours in eleven months. > The LME misstates a 1 GW ramp by more than 10% in 60% to 83% of hours in eleven months. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.12056) ## Source-stated The authors report that upward and downward ramps differ in many hours but agree on their monthly mean. > Upward and downward ramps differ in a quarter to three quarters of hours but agree on their monthly mean. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.12056) ## Source-stated The authors say location-based reporting assigns a substantial share of a ramp’s emissions to other consumers, and recommend scheduling and reporting based on the campus’s ramp. > Location-based reporting assigns 47% to 59% of a ramp's emission to other consumers. A campus should schedule on the signal for its ramp's size and direction and report the emission it causes. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.12056) ## Source and contributor context Shi, Xiaoying, Yan, Jinyue · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## Megawatt A unit of power equal to a million watts. - [Definition reference](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watt) ## Gigawatt A unit of power equal to a billion watts, roughly the output of a large power plant. - [Definition reference](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watt) ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: 433c73fe-5118-45cf-85f1-9565485b441d. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-10T21:17:39.312Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: 0c0322fc389927c4776a203fc85dcd2fcc38617d65674cbc2044dd70eabfb4bb. Source text hash: 9b15ff36bbf5a9e1705a2126383005839a53ac68ef9857a42f1a49b7640ead8a. ### uncertain — 2026-11-10T21:17:39.312Z — anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 Publication: 433c73fe-5118-45cf-85f1-9565485b441d attribution — pass: The reading correctly attributes the work, findings and recommendation to authors Xiaoying Shi and Jinyue Yan of the arXiv paper. Results are framed as what the authors compute, report or recommend, not as established fact. > Authors:Xiaoying Shi, Jinyue Yan summary — uncertain: The reading is faithful, but central terms are not explained for a general reader. The headline result depends on the locational marginal emission rate (LME), which is expanded but never explained. PJM Interconnection and location-based reporting are also unexplained. The reading omits the paper's comparison with the regional average. Smallest repair: briefly say what PJM is, what the LME measures, and what location-based reporting means, using tooltips where available. The reading should then state why mis-signalled ramps matter for scheduling and emissions accounting. > compare it with the locational marginal emission rate (LME) and the regional average date — pass: The originalPublished date of 2026-11-09 matches the arXiv v1 submission date. It is not the later feed entry. > \[Submitted on 9 Nov 2026\] support — pass: Every claim, including the 60% to 83% figure, the 47% to 59% figure, the monthly mean point and the recommendation, matches the abstract verbatim. The limitations correctly note that only the abstract was supplied. The generalization question follows from the stated scope and does not assert an answer. > The LME misstates a 1 GW ramp by more than 10% in 60% to 83% of hours in eleven months. media — pass: The selected media ID is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper. It is the most direct way to access the source. ## Recorded references Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter. No public references recorded here yet. [Reference data (JSON)](/readings/532b823672cd0320776401a15cfe653616aa4cfa7f2d6464533c86d54b256d6d/references.json) ## Corrections and challenges [Send a correction or an opposing source](https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/) [JSON record](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/arxiv-why-the-authors-say-hourly-carbon-signals-miss-data-532b8236.json)