# Authors of an arXiv paper introduce LLM-PowerTrace, a dataset of GPU power traces [Canonical reading](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/authors-of-an-arxiv-paper-introduce-llm-powertrace-a-dataset-of-23df802e) The authors introduce LLM-PowerTrace, an open dataset of per-GPU power measurements for LLM fine-tuning and inference, sampled every 100 ms and paired with workload and system metadata. They argue that total energy figures alone miss how power draw changes over time: peaks, ramps and synchronized fluctuations that may affect data centers and power grids. The dataset includes measurements across model families and varying workloads. For fine-tuning, the authors sweep batch size, sequence length, precision, parallelism and checkpointing; for inference, they vary concurrency, GPU frequency, KV-cache and weight quantization, prompt and output lengths, and request-arrival patterns. They also define power-grid-facing metrics and an AI-compute power&energy scaling law to extrapolate beyond measured settings. The authors present the dataset as a foundation for modeling, forecasting and managing AI compute’s changing electrical behavior. Whether these measurements and extrapolations generalize to other hardware and real-world deployments remains open. Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims. ## Original source arXiv cs.AI · Article Original source date: Oct 28, 2026 (2026-10-28). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-10-31T05:03:38.226Z. First observed: 2026-10-30T06:40:59.359Z. Retrieved: 2026-10-31T05:02:44.526Z. - [LLM-PowerTrace: A Dataset of Time-Resolved GPU Power Traces for AI Compute](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38315) ## Limits The abstract does not establish how well the measurements or scaling law generalize beyond the profiled NVIDIA platforms, models and workloads. The evidence is the paper’s abstract and does not report validation results for forecasts or effects on power-grid operations. ## Open question How well do the dataset’s measurements and scaling law predict power behavior on hardware and workloads beyond those profiled? ## Source-stated The authors introduce an open dataset of time-resolved, per-GPU power traces for LLM fine-tuning and inference, sampled every 100 ms and paired with workload and system metadata. > an open dataset of time-resolved, per-GPU power traces for LLM fine-tuning and inference, sampled every 100\\,ms on varying NVIDIA platforms paired with complete workload and system metadata. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38315) ## Source-stated The authors argue that total energy measurements alone leave important time-varying power behavior poorly characterized, including peaks, ramps and synchronized fluctuations. > Existing energy benchmarks for large language models (LLMs) report aggregate quantities such as joules per token and rarely release the underlying time-series measurements, leaving these power dynamics poorly characterized - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38315) ## Source-stated The dataset varies workloads and system settings for both fine-tuning and inference. > controlled sweeps over batch size, sequence length, precision, parallelism, and checkpointing. For inference, it covers variations in concurrency, GPU frequency, KV-cache and weight quantization - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38315) ## Source-stated The authors define power-grid-facing metrics and an AI-compute power and energy scaling law for extrapolating beyond measured settings. > we define power-grid-facing metrics as well as AI-compute power\\&energy scaling law for extrapolating beyond the measured settings. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38315) ## Source-stated The paper presents the dataset as a basis for modeling, forecasting and managing AI compute’s changing electrical behavior. > provides a dataset foundation for modeling, forecasting, and managing the fast-changing electrical behavior of AI compute. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38315) ## Source and contributor context Wang, Jiansheng, Singh, Jaskeerat, Xu, Haochen, Li, Xinyi, Yan, Mingyuan, Liu, Shaohui, Li, Yuzhuo, Chen, Yize, Cui, Wenqi · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## Large language model A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#large-language-model) ## Graphics processing unit A chip that performs many calculations at once; the main hardware used to train and run AI models. - [Definition reference](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphics_processing_unit) ## Fine-tuning Further training of an existing model to adapt it to a particular task or use. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#fine-tuning) ## Quantization Storing a model's numbers at lower precision so it uses less memory and runs faster, sometimes at a cost in accuracy. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#quantization) ## AI compute The computing resources, meaning chips, data centers and electricity, used to train or run AI models. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#compute) ## Scaling laws Observed patterns in which model performance improves predictably as data, model size and computation grow. - [Definition reference](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neural_scaling_law) ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## NVIDIA NVIDIA develops processors, networking and software used for AI, graphics and scientific computing. - [Explore this context](/entities/nvidia) - [Reference](https://blogs.nvidia.com/) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: b7f44020-513e-4dff-8c25-2166a0eda440. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-10-31T05:03:38.226Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: ac496e48791355329d3753dad3b7572b5441e54267985fefec5eb13299e2dc72. Source text hash: 0978b65450afe78e74aedb630b41bfd634595cb1a954ff555c0e35186b7a95b3. ## Revision and source-check history ### Version 1 — 2026-10-31T05:03:38.226Z The authors introduce LLM-PowerTrace, an open dataset of per-GPU power measurements for LLM fine-tuning and inference, sampled every 100 ms and paired with workload and system metadata. They argue that total energy figures alone miss how power draw changes over time: peaks, ramps and synchronized fluctuations that may affect data centers and power grids. The dataset includes measurements across model families and varying workloads. For fine-tuning, the authors sweep batch size, sequence length, precision, parallelism and checkpointing; for inference, they vary concurrency, GPU frequency, KV-cache and weight quantization, prompt and output lengths, and request-arrival patterns. They also define power-grid-facing metrics and an AI-compute power&energy scaling law to extrapolate beyond measured settings. The authors present the dataset as a foundation for modeling, forecasting and managing AI compute’s changing electrical behavior. Whether these measurements and extrapolations generalize to other hardware and real-world deployments remains open. ## Original source arXiv cs.AI · Article Original source date: Oct 28, 2026 (2026-10-28). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-10-31T05:03:38.226Z. First observed: 2026-10-30T06:40:59.359Z. Retrieved: 2026-10-31T05:02:44.526Z. - [LLM-PowerTrace: A Dataset of Time-Resolved GPU Power Traces for AI Compute](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38315) ## Limits The abstract does not establish how well the measurements or scaling law generalize beyond the profiled NVIDIA platforms, models and workloads. The evidence is the paper’s abstract and does not report validation results for forecasts or effects on power-grid operations. ## Open question How well do the dataset’s measurements and scaling law predict power behavior on hardware and workloads beyond those profiled? ## Source-stated The authors introduce an open dataset of time-resolved, per-GPU power traces for LLM fine-tuning and inference, sampled every 100 ms and paired with workload and system metadata. > an open dataset of time-resolved, per-GPU power traces for LLM fine-tuning and inference, sampled every 100\\,ms on varying NVIDIA platforms paired with complete workload and system metadata. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38315) ## Source-stated The authors argue that total energy measurements alone leave important time-varying power behavior poorly characterized, including peaks, ramps and synchronized fluctuations. > Existing energy benchmarks for large language models (LLMs) report aggregate quantities such as joules per token and rarely release the underlying time-series measurements, leaving these power dynamics poorly characterized - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38315) ## Source-stated The dataset varies workloads and system settings for both fine-tuning and inference. > controlled sweeps over batch size, sequence length, precision, parallelism, and checkpointing. For inference, it covers variations in concurrency, GPU frequency, KV-cache and weight quantization - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38315) ## Source-stated The authors define power-grid-facing metrics and an AI-compute power and energy scaling law for extrapolating beyond measured settings. > we define power-grid-facing metrics as well as AI-compute power\\&energy scaling law for extrapolating beyond the measured settings. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38315) ## Source-stated The paper presents the dataset as a basis for modeling, forecasting and managing AI compute’s changing electrical behavior. > provides a dataset foundation for modeling, forecasting, and managing the fast-changing electrical behavior of AI compute. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38315) ## Source and contributor context Wang, Jiansheng, Singh, Jaskeerat, Xu, Haochen, Li, Xinyi, Yan, Mingyuan, Liu, Shaohui, Li, Yuzhuo, Chen, Yize, Cui, Wenqi · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## Large language model A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#large-language-model) ## Graphics processing unit A chip that performs many calculations at once; the main hardware used to train and run AI models. - [Definition reference](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphics_processing_unit) ## Fine-tuning Further training of an existing model to adapt it to a particular task or use. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#fine-tuning) ## Quantization Storing a model's numbers at lower precision so it uses less memory and runs faster, sometimes at a cost in accuracy. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#quantization) ## AI compute The computing resources, meaning chips, data centers and electricity, used to train or run AI models. - [Definition reference](https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#compute) ## Scaling laws Observed patterns in which model performance improves predictably as data, model size and computation grow. - [Definition reference](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neural_scaling_law) ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## NVIDIA NVIDIA develops processors, networking and software used for AI, graphics and scientific computing. - [Explore this context](/entities/nvidia) - [Reference](https://blogs.nvidia.com/) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: b7f44020-513e-4dff-8c25-2166a0eda440. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-10-31T05:03:38.226Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: ac496e48791355329d3753dad3b7572b5441e54267985fefec5eb13299e2dc72. Source text hash: 0978b65450afe78e74aedb630b41bfd634595cb1a954ff555c0e35186b7a95b3. ### passed — 2026-10-31T05:03:38.226Z — anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 Publication: b7f44020-513e-4dff-8c25-2166a0eda440 attribution — pass: The reading consistently attributes the dataset, its motivation, the metrics and the scaling law to the arXiv paper's authors. It does not present their claims as established fact or as Escape Meridian's view. > We introduce LLM-PowerTrace, an open dataset of time-resolved, per-GPU power traces for LLM fine-tuning and inference summary — pass: The summary leads with the actor and the new dataset. It explains in plain language why time-varying power draw matters beyond total energy: peaks, ramps and synchronized fluctuations affecting data centers and grids. Technical terms such as KV-cache, quantization and scaling law are kept exactly, which suits tooltips, and the central meaning stays readable. The title, question and stated open issue follow from the evidence without overstating it. > Its impacts on data center infrastructure and power grids depend not only on total energy consumption, but also on how their power draw moves over sub-second to minute timescales date — pass: The originalPublished date of 2026-10-28 matches the v1 submission date on the arXiv page. The later feed date of October 31 is correctly not used. > \[Submitted on 28 Oct 2026\] support — pass: Each claim matches the abstract with exact excerpts. The reading frames the grid significance as the authors' argument. It does not claim demonstrated grid benefits, and it correctly notes that the evidence does not show generalization beyond the profiled NVIDIA platforms or any forecast validation. No unsupported benefits, costs or stakeholders are invented. > we define power-grid-facing metrics as well as AI-compute power\\&energy scaling law for extrapolating beyond the measured settings. media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct link to the arXiv abstract page, the original source. No better direct media was found. ## Recorded references Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter. No public references recorded here yet. [Reference data (JSON)](/readings/23df802e86541712b8fd720e17d11818ead81efd519d80b5190ac42fd3ba0c16/references.json) ## Corrections and challenges [Send a correction or an opposing source](https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/) [JSON record](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/authors-of-an-arxiv-paper-introduce-llm-powertrace-a-dataset-of-23df802e.json)