{"id":"7a6159bc503418772f21862a5b3d6465748c282da7bd29b1bb6244b01654b02a","title":"Campbell Lund et al. argue in Cohere that exposure scores need policy coordination","argument":"Cohere authors Campbell Lund, Thomas Euyang, Zanele Munyikwa and Marzieh Fadaee published this paper on June 10, 2026. They describe GPTs are GPTs scores as measuring the share of occupational tasks a large language model tool can assist with. The scores capture particular AI systems, an occupational taxonomy and a specific moment, the authors say; their influence in policy analysis has outlasted those limits. They argue that policy-facing work continues to use static scores without engaging with methodological updates that could make assessments more reliable.\n\nThe authors survey research responding to static scoring’s limits, including worker-centered metrics and adoption and usage data. But better measurement alone, they argue, will not close the deeper coordination gap between researchers and policymakers. They call on policymakers to widen the evidence base, engage workers as epistemic partners and shift from prediction to preparedness. Researchers, they say, should build data infrastructure, use interdisciplinary and participatory methods, and produce work with policymakers’ needs in mind. The authors conclude that closing the research-policy gap is a shared task, with distinct but parallel responsibilities. The abstract does not specify how these changes would affect particular policy decisions or outcomes.","topicIds":["work-and-business--jobs-and-occupations","job-displacement-and-creation"],"domain":"other","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"Text as retrieved on November 5, 2026; originally published June 10, 2026. The page provides the paper’s abstract rather than its full text, so the five research families and proposed responsibilities are described only at abstract level. The abstract does not specify how the proposed changes would affect particular policy decisions or outcomes.","speaker":{"name":"Cohere","roleAtSource":"Publisher"},"source":{"title":"AI Exposure Scores: What they measure, what they miss, and what comes next","publisher":"Cohere","format":"Article","url":"https://cohere.com/research/papers/ai-exposure-scores-what-they-measure-what-they-miss-and-what-comes-next-2026-06-10","publishedAt":"2026-06-10T00:00:00.000Z","dateBasis":"Date stated on the publisher’s page."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors describe GPTs are GPTs scores as measuring the percentage of occupational tasks a large language model tool can assist with.","excerpt":"they define exposure as the percentage of occupational tasks a large language model (LLM) tool can assist with","url":"https://cohere.com/research/papers/ai-exposure-scores-what-they-measure-what-they-miss-and-what-comes-next-2026-06-10","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that static exposure scores have specific temporal, geographic and ontological limits, and that policy analyses have not kept pace with methodological updates.","excerpt":"The policy-relevant work—analyses which ask who is harmed, who benefits, how, and when—continues to reference the static GPTs are GPTs scores without engagement with the methodological updates","url":"https://cohere.com/research/papers/ai-exposure-scores-what-they-measure-what-they-miss-and-what-comes-next-2026-06-10","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that researchers and policymakers share responsibility for closing the gap, with distinct but parallel roles.","excerpt":"We argue that closing the gap between research and policy is a shared task, with distinct but parallel responsibilities.","url":"https://cohere.com/research/papers/ai-exposure-scores-what-they-measure-what-they-miss-and-what-comes-next-2026-06-10","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say better measurement alone will not close the research-policy coordination gap.","excerpt":"Better measurement matters, but it will not close the second gap alone.","url":"https://cohere.com/research/papers/ai-exposure-scores-what-they-measure-what-they-miss-and-what-comes-next-2026-06-10","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://cohere.com/research/papers/ai-exposure-scores-what-they-measure-what-they-miss-and-what-comes-next-2026-06-10","checkedAt":null,"items":[]},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How might policymakers and researchers carry out these distinct but parallel responsibilities, and what evidence would show that they improve policy decisions?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Campbell Lund et al. argue in Cohere that exposure scores need policy coordination","summary":"Cohere authors Campbell Lund, Thomas Euyang, Zanele Munyikwa and Marzieh Fadaee published this paper on June 10, 2026. They describe GPTs are GPTs scores as measuring the share of occupational tasks a large language model tool can assist with. The scores capture particular AI systems, an occupational taxonomy and a specific moment, the authors say; their influence in policy analysis has outlasted those limits. They argue that policy-facing work continues to use static scores without engaging with methodological updates that could make assessments more reliable.\n\nThe authors survey research responding to static scoring’s limits, including worker-centered metrics and adoption and usage data. But better measurement alone, they argue, will not close the deeper coordination gap between researchers and policymakers. They call on policymakers to widen the evidence base, engage workers as epistemic partners and shift from prediction to preparedness. Researchers, they say, should build data infrastructure, use interdisciplinary and participatory methods, and produce work with policymakers’ needs in mind. The authors conclude that closing the research-policy gap is a shared task, with distinct but parallel responsibilities. The abstract does not specify how these changes would affect particular policy decisions or outcomes.","question":"How might policymakers and researchers carry out these distinct but parallel responsibilities, and what evidence would show that they improve policy decisions?","claims":[{"text":"The authors describe GPTs are GPTs scores as measuring the percentage of occupational tasks a large language model tool can assist with.","excerpt":"they define exposure as the percentage of occupational tasks a large language model (LLM) tool can assist with","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that static exposure scores have specific temporal, geographic and ontological limits, and that policy analyses have not kept pace with methodological updates.","excerpt":"The policy-relevant work—analyses which ask who is harmed, who benefits, how, and when—continues to reference the static GPTs are GPTs scores without engagement with the methodological updates","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that researchers and policymakers share responsibility for closing the gap, with distinct but parallel roles.","excerpt":"We argue that closing the gap between research and policy is a shared task, with distinct but parallel responsibilities.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say better measurement alone will not close the research-policy coordination gap.","excerpt":"Better measurement matters, but it will not close the second gap alone.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["Text as retrieved on November 5, 2026; originally published June 10, 2026.","The page provides the paper’s abstract rather than its full text, so the five research families and proposed responsibilities are described only at abstract level.","The abstract does not specify how the proposed changes would affect particular policy decisions or outcomes."],"mediaId":null,"correctionReason":null,"id":"7a6159bc503418772f21862a5b3d6465748c282da7bd29b1bb6244b01654b02a","publicationId":"f14e1ae0-eedf-8637-7f89-6de86b1509be","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://cohere.com/research/papers/ai-exposure-scores-what-they-measure-what-they-miss-and-what-comes-next-2026-06-10","sourceTitle":"AI Exposure Scores: What they measure, what they miss, and what comes next","publisher":"Cohere","publishedAt":"2026-06-10T00:00:00.000Z","originalPublished":{"value":"2026-06-10T00:00:00.000Z","precision":"instant","basis":"backfill:article_published"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-05T12:27:41.293Z","createdAt":"2026-11-06T17:08:23.378Z","historical":true,"entityIds":[],"topicIds":["work-and-business--jobs-and-occupations","job-displacement-and-creation"],"media":[],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://cohere.com/research/papers/ai-exposure-scores-what-they-measure-what-they-miss-and-what-comes-next-2026-06-10","checkedAt":null,"items":[]},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","mediaId":null,"inputHash":"6f50d701067e5162c196c63466b3529ddc5cfc782dbada5c2834bda40f2dca86","rubricVersion":"unrecorded","provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","reasonCodes":["bridge_admitted_by_model"],"confidence":0.92,"decidedAt":"2026-11-05T12:27:40.683Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"79aac34fc6c4ce2605719e42739f2da075341ea2b7ff1161ffa43ed5e162583d","observationId":"b3796f0b7761d08f97a012432954daeaf450f97e8b973eb0779e35727d10992c","retrievedAt":"2026-11-05T12:29:38.786Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"openai/gpt-6-luna","runId":"a39cb2d1-26b2-f8bd-69fa-cd22e3aca98c"},"reviewer":{"model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5","runId":"0c38e422-bcc1-f67b-7b9e-ebf9d8e587e3"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-06T17:03:48.309Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/campbell-lund-et-al-argue-in-cohere-that-exposure-scores-need-7a6159bc","formats":{"html":"/readings/campbell-lund-et-al-argue-in-cohere-that-exposure-scores-need-7a6159bc","markdown":"/readings/campbell-lund-et-al-argue-in-cohere-that-exposure-scores-need-7a6159bc.md","json":"/readings/campbell-lund-et-al-argue-in-cohere-that-exposure-scores-need-7a6159bc.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[{"id":"term-llm","name":"Large language model","explanation":"A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#large-language-model"}],"entities":[]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"7a6159bc503418772f21862a5b3d6465748c282da7bd29b1bb6244b01654b02a","revision":"f14e1ae0-eedf-8637-7f89-6de86b1509be","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"Campbell Lund et al. argue in Cohere that exposure scores need policy coordination","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/campbell-lund-et-al-argue-in-cohere-that-exposure-scores-need-7a6159bc"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://cohere.com/research/papers/ai-exposure-scores-what-they-measure-what-they-miss-and-what-comes-next-2026-06-10","revision":"79aac34fc6c4ce2605719e42739f2da075341ea2b7ff1161ffa43ed5e162583d","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"AI Exposure Scores: What they measure, what they miss, and what comes next","url":"https://cohere.com/research/papers/ai-exposure-scores-what-they-measure-what-they-miss-and-what-comes-next-2026-06-10"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"7a6159bc503418772f21862a5b3d6465748c282da7bd29b1bb6244b01654b02a","title":"Campbell Lund et al. argue in Cohere that exposure scores need policy coordination","argument":"Cohere authors Campbell Lund, Thomas Euyang, Zanele Munyikwa and Marzieh Fadaee published this paper on June 10, 2026. They describe GPTs are GPTs scores as measuring the share of occupational tasks a large language model tool can assist with. The scores capture particular AI systems, an occupational taxonomy and a specific moment, the authors say; their influence in policy analysis has outlasted those limits. They argue that policy-facing work continues to use static scores without engaging with methodological updates that could make assessments more reliable.\n\nThe authors survey research responding to static scoring’s limits, including worker-centered metrics and adoption and usage data. But better measurement alone, they argue, will not close the deeper coordination gap between researchers and policymakers. They call on policymakers to widen the evidence base, engage workers as epistemic partners and shift from prediction to preparedness. Researchers, they say, should build data infrastructure, use interdisciplinary and participatory methods, and produce work with policymakers’ needs in mind. The authors conclude that closing the research-policy gap is a shared task, with distinct but parallel responsibilities. The abstract does not specify how these changes would affect particular policy decisions or outcomes.","topicIds":["work-and-business--jobs-and-occupations","job-displacement-and-creation"],"domain":"other","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"Text as retrieved on November 5, 2026; originally published June 10, 2026. The page provides the paper’s abstract rather than its full text, so the five research families and proposed responsibilities are described only at abstract level. The abstract does not specify how the proposed changes would affect particular policy decisions or outcomes.","speaker":{"name":"Cohere","roleAtSource":"Publisher"},"source":{"title":"AI Exposure Scores: What they measure, what they miss, and what comes next","publisher":"Cohere","format":"Article","url":"https://cohere.com/research/papers/ai-exposure-scores-what-they-measure-what-they-miss-and-what-comes-next-2026-06-10","publishedAt":"2026-06-10T00:00:00.000Z","dateBasis":"Date stated on the publisher’s page."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors describe GPTs are GPTs scores as measuring the percentage of occupational tasks a large language model tool can assist with.","excerpt":"they define exposure as the percentage of occupational tasks a large language model (LLM) tool can assist with","url":"https://cohere.com/research/papers/ai-exposure-scores-what-they-measure-what-they-miss-and-what-comes-next-2026-06-10","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that static exposure scores have specific temporal, geographic and ontological limits, and that policy analyses have not kept pace with methodological updates.","excerpt":"The policy-relevant work—analyses which ask who is harmed, who benefits, how, and when—continues to reference the static GPTs are GPTs scores without engagement with the methodological updates","url":"https://cohere.com/research/papers/ai-exposure-scores-what-they-measure-what-they-miss-and-what-comes-next-2026-06-10","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that researchers and policymakers share responsibility for closing the gap, with distinct but parallel roles.","excerpt":"We argue that closing the gap between research and policy is a shared task, with distinct but parallel responsibilities.","url":"https://cohere.com/research/papers/ai-exposure-scores-what-they-measure-what-they-miss-and-what-comes-next-2026-06-10","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say better measurement alone will not close the research-policy coordination gap.","excerpt":"Better measurement matters, but it will not close the second gap alone.","url":"https://cohere.com/research/papers/ai-exposure-scores-what-they-measure-what-they-miss-and-what-comes-next-2026-06-10","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://cohere.com/research/papers/ai-exposure-scores-what-they-measure-what-they-miss-and-what-comes-next-2026-06-10","checkedAt":null,"items":[]},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How might policymakers and researchers carry out these distinct but parallel responsibilities, and what evidence would show that they improve policy decisions?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Campbell Lund et al. argue in Cohere that exposure scores need policy coordination","summary":"Cohere authors Campbell Lund, Thomas Euyang, Zanele Munyikwa and Marzieh Fadaee published this paper on June 10, 2026. They describe GPTs are GPTs scores as measuring the share of occupational tasks a large language model tool can assist with. The scores capture particular AI systems, an occupational taxonomy and a specific moment, the authors say; their influence in policy analysis has outlasted those limits. They argue that policy-facing work continues to use static scores without engaging with methodological updates that could make assessments more reliable.\n\nThe authors survey research responding to static scoring’s limits, including worker-centered metrics and adoption and usage data. But better measurement alone, they argue, will not close the deeper coordination gap between researchers and policymakers. They call on policymakers to widen the evidence base, engage workers as epistemic partners and shift from prediction to preparedness. Researchers, they say, should build data infrastructure, use interdisciplinary and participatory methods, and produce work with policymakers’ needs in mind. The authors conclude that closing the research-policy gap is a shared task, with distinct but parallel responsibilities. The abstract does not specify how these changes would affect particular policy decisions or outcomes.","question":"How might policymakers and researchers carry out these distinct but parallel responsibilities, and what evidence would show that they improve policy decisions?","claims":[{"text":"The authors describe GPTs are GPTs scores as measuring the percentage of occupational tasks a large language model tool can assist with.","excerpt":"they define exposure as the percentage of occupational tasks a large language model (LLM) tool can assist with","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that static exposure scores have specific temporal, geographic and ontological limits, and that policy analyses have not kept pace with methodological updates.","excerpt":"The policy-relevant work—analyses which ask who is harmed, who benefits, how, and when—continues to reference the static GPTs are GPTs scores without engagement with the methodological updates","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that researchers and policymakers share responsibility for closing the gap, with distinct but parallel roles.","excerpt":"We argue that closing the gap between research and policy is a shared task, with distinct but parallel responsibilities.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say better measurement alone will not close the research-policy coordination gap.","excerpt":"Better measurement matters, but it will not close the second gap alone.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["Text as retrieved on November 5, 2026; originally published June 10, 2026.","The page provides the paper’s abstract rather than its full text, so the five research families and proposed responsibilities are described only at abstract level.","The abstract does not specify how the proposed changes would affect particular policy decisions or outcomes."],"mediaId":null,"correctionReason":null,"id":"7a6159bc503418772f21862a5b3d6465748c282da7bd29b1bb6244b01654b02a","publicationId":"f14e1ae0-eedf-8637-7f89-6de86b1509be","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://cohere.com/research/papers/ai-exposure-scores-what-they-measure-what-they-miss-and-what-comes-next-2026-06-10","sourceTitle":"AI Exposure Scores: What they measure, what they miss, and what comes next","publisher":"Cohere","publishedAt":"2026-06-10T00:00:00.000Z","originalPublished":{"value":"2026-06-10T00:00:00.000Z","precision":"instant","basis":"backfill:article_published"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-05T12:27:41.293Z","createdAt":"2026-11-06T17:08:23.378Z","historical":true,"entityIds":[],"topicIds":["work-and-business--jobs-and-occupations","job-displacement-and-creation"],"media":[],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://cohere.com/research/papers/ai-exposure-scores-what-they-measure-what-they-miss-and-what-comes-next-2026-06-10","checkedAt":null,"items":[]},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","mediaId":null,"inputHash":"6f50d701067e5162c196c63466b3529ddc5cfc782dbada5c2834bda40f2dca86","rubricVersion":"unrecorded","provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","reasonCodes":["bridge_admitted_by_model"],"confidence":0.92,"decidedAt":"2026-11-05T12:27:40.683Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"79aac34fc6c4ce2605719e42739f2da075341ea2b7ff1161ffa43ed5e162583d","observationId":"b3796f0b7761d08f97a012432954daeaf450f97e8b973eb0779e35727d10992c","retrievedAt":"2026-11-05T12:29:38.786Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"openai/gpt-6-luna","runId":"a39cb2d1-26b2-f8bd-69fa-cd22e3aca98c"},"reviewer":{"model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5","runId":"0c38e422-bcc1-f67b-7b9e-ebf9d8e587e3"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-06T17:03:48.309Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"f14e1ae0-eedf-8637-7f89-6de86b1509be","verdict":"uncertain","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The four named authors match the page, and the argument is attributed to them throughout. Calling them 'Cohere authors' rests on the paper appearing on Cohere's research page; the text does not state their affiliations, but this does not misattribute the argument.","excerpt":"Campbell Lund, Thomas Euyang, Zanele Munyikwa, and Marzieh Fadaee"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"uncertain","explanation":"The summary never says the GPTs are GPTs scores were produced in 2023 by Eloundou et al. A general reader could assume the Cohere authors created them or not see why age matters to the temporal critique. Smallest repair: say the scores were calculated in 2023 by Eloundou et al. Otherwise the two gaps, the five research families and the shared responsibilities are conveyed faithfully. 'Epistemic partners' is left unexplained but is not central.","excerpt":"A set of exposure scores calculated in 2023 have become a central empirical input to the future of work debate. Produced by Eloundou et al. (2023)"},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The June 10, 2026 date matches the page dateline and originalPublished at day precision. The modified date equals the publication date. The related-works sidebar is not used. Nothing is framed with hindsight.","excerpt":"Jun 10, 2026"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"The claims match the abstract: the exposure definition, the temporal, geographic and ontological limitations, policy work not engaging with methodological updates, the shared responsibilities, and the statement that measurement is not enough. The question and limitations stay conditional and do not add unsupported benefits.","excerpt":"we observe tangible impacts in how the temporal, geographic, and ontological limitations of these scores compound when translated into policy-facing analyses"},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"No media is selected and no candidates were supplied, so nothing is misidentified.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-06T17:03:48.309Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}