{"id":"442322d244dae590faea97939c0b94de4343c6c1b6a5ba75664cca4b1e4def98","title":"Causal Discovery Bench: Can LLMs Autonomously Conduct Effective Experiments?","argument":"In their paper, Zhuoyang Liu, Ning Peng, Ming Shen and Zijun Gao introduce Causal-Discovery-Bench, a sandbox for testing whether LLM agents can design experiments and discover causal relationships. The authors argue that evaluating agents only on reasoning from prepared evidence misses a separate challenge: choosing informative experiments, managing resources, interpreting observations as they arrive, and deciding when to stop. Across 3,802 episodes with 13 models from 5 vendors, they report a hierarchy of difficulty, from designing a single experiment to resolving conflicting evidence autonomously. Their analysis attributes 94.5% of agent mistakes to experimental design rather than inference. They also report that relaxing resource constraints alone does not reliably fix failures in sequential discovery, while basic statistical tools improve performance across multiple model families. Advanced tools add little when models lack prerequisite lower-level capabilities. The results point to experiment design—not just drawing conclusions from curated evidence—as a central part of autonomous research, within the benchmark’s configurable sandbox.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The supplied evidence is the paper’s abstract and publisher page, not the full paper; it does not provide the benchmark’s detailed task design or results for individual models. The reported findings concern a configurable sandbox without domain-semantic cues; the supplied evidence does not establish how well they generalize to other settings.","speaker":{"name":"Liu, Zhuoyang, Peng, Ning, Shen, Ming, Gao, Zijun","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Causal Discovery Bench: Can LLMs Autonomously Conduct Effective Experiments?","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","publishedAt":"2026-10-13","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors introduce a sandbox to evaluate sequential experimental design and causal discovery without domain-semantic cues.","excerpt":"a verifiable sandbox with configurable structural equation models and resource constraints to evaluate sequential experimental design and causal discovery without domain-semantic cues","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The study covers 3,802 episodes and 13 models from 5 vendors, and reports four levels of difficulty.","excerpt":"Across 3,802 episodes with 13 models from 5 vendors, we analyze agent behavior along 40 metrics in seven families. Agents' performance exhibits a four-level difficulty hierarchy","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors attribute most agent mistakes to experimental design rather than inference.","excerpt":"attributes 94.5% of their mistakes to experimental design rather than to inference","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that basic statistical tools improve performance, while advanced tools add little if lower-level capabilities are missing.","excerpt":"basic statistical tools substantially improve performance across multiple model families, while advanced tools provide little additional benefit when models lack prerequisite lower-level capabilities.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","checkedAt":"2026-11-12T10:50:07.849Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"Would the reported benefits of basic statistical tools persist across different experimental settings beyond this benchmark’s configurable sandbox?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Causal Discovery Bench: Can LLMs Autonomously Conduct Effective Experiments?","summary":"In their paper, Zhuoyang Liu, Ning Peng, Ming Shen and Zijun Gao introduce Causal-Discovery-Bench, a sandbox for testing whether LLM agents can design experiments and discover causal relationships. The authors argue that evaluating agents only on reasoning from prepared evidence misses a separate challenge: choosing informative experiments, managing resources, interpreting observations as they arrive, and deciding when to stop. Across 3,802 episodes with 13 models from 5 vendors, they report a hierarchy of difficulty, from designing a single experiment to resolving conflicting evidence autonomously. Their analysis attributes 94.5% of agent mistakes to experimental design rather than inference. They also report that relaxing resource constraints alone does not reliably fix failures in sequential discovery, while basic statistical tools improve performance across multiple model families. Advanced tools add little when models lack prerequisite lower-level capabilities. The results point to experiment design—not just drawing conclusions from curated evidence—as a central part of autonomous research, within the benchmark’s configurable sandbox.","question":"Would the reported benefits of basic statistical tools persist across different experimental settings beyond this benchmark’s configurable sandbox?","claims":[{"text":"The authors introduce a sandbox to evaluate sequential experimental design and causal discovery without domain-semantic cues.","excerpt":"a verifiable sandbox with configurable structural equation models and resource constraints to evaluate sequential experimental design and causal discovery without domain-semantic cues","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The study covers 3,802 episodes and 13 models from 5 vendors, and reports four levels of difficulty.","excerpt":"Across 3,802 episodes with 13 models from 5 vendors, we analyze agent behavior along 40 metrics in seven families. Agents' performance exhibits a four-level difficulty hierarchy","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors attribute most agent mistakes to experimental design rather than inference.","excerpt":"attributes 94.5% of their mistakes to experimental design rather than to inference","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that basic statistical tools improve performance, while advanced tools add little if lower-level capabilities are missing.","excerpt":"basic statistical tools substantially improve performance across multiple model families, while advanced tools provide little additional benefit when models lack prerequisite lower-level capabilities.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The supplied evidence is the paper’s abstract and publisher page, not the full paper; it does not provide the benchmark’s detailed task design or results for individual models.","The reported findings concern a configurable sandbox without domain-semantic cues; the supplied evidence does not establish how well they generalize to other settings."],"mediaId":"97564ba477f543718c25f71d84f8f41db1491348e6a87aff296442000ab93e31","correctionReason":null,"id":"442322d244dae590faea97939c0b94de4343c6c1b6a5ba75664cca4b1e4def98","publicationId":"997bcdeb-4b63-4aca-8524-c1c9b14e3c52","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","sourceTitle":"Causal Discovery Bench: Can LLMs Autonomously Conduct Effective Experiments?","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-13","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-10T08:39:38.067Z","createdAt":"2026-11-12T09:46:29.102Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"97564ba477f543718c25f71d84f8f41db1491348e6a87aff296442000ab93e31","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-12T09:33:11.793Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","checkedAt":"2026-11-12T10:50:07.849Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v6","mediaId":"97564ba477f543718c25f71d84f8f41db1491348e6a87aff296442000ab93e31","confidence":0.8300000000000001,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"9776b5626272b4e3a3155236cb2a9b0396b53e376f944a1af54897347ac9f9f7","decidedAt":"2026-11-12T09:33:14.440Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"234e059b28ed18292efa30d28e7df36b6e9691244bbcd109b034aebad46f9d82","observationId":"8eb057e709cc9e483273a2d9a44bb3951ebb98f9a4281d820f72b411e16ef56d","retrievedAt":"2026-11-12T09:33:11.434Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"2d7c1089-8b65-4181-85a9-89d20ffaaf23"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"3751efb4-6f3d-45f2-8d74-17e2b230e06f"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-11-12T09:46:29.102Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Liu, Zhuoyang","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Peng, Ning","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Shen, Ming","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Gao, Zijun","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Liu, Zhuoyang","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Liu, Zhuoyang","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"cb118d7db38c4e1e6846ffc712363b614a6b782abb85b8ae8af78dc7646ec2e9:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-12T10:50:07.849Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"cb118d7db38c4e1e6846ffc712363b614a6b782abb85b8ae8af78dc7646ec2e9","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","contentSha256":"015ebb2cea0979020e06a34bfcf4e49a6c38602be021fe85ffbeec9c68d8c8bf","textHash":"234e059b28ed18292efa30d28e7df36b6e9691244bbcd109b034aebad46f9d82","observedAt":"2026-11-12T10:50:07.849Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Peng, Ning","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Peng, Ning","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"cb118d7db38c4e1e6846ffc712363b614a6b782abb85b8ae8af78dc7646ec2e9:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-12T10:50:07.849Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"cb118d7db38c4e1e6846ffc712363b614a6b782abb85b8ae8af78dc7646ec2e9","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","contentSha256":"015ebb2cea0979020e06a34bfcf4e49a6c38602be021fe85ffbeec9c68d8c8bf","textHash":"234e059b28ed18292efa30d28e7df36b6e9691244bbcd109b034aebad46f9d82","observedAt":"2026-11-12T10:50:07.849Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Shen, Ming","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Shen, Ming","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"cb118d7db38c4e1e6846ffc712363b614a6b782abb85b8ae8af78dc7646ec2e9:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-12T10:50:07.849Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"cb118d7db38c4e1e6846ffc712363b614a6b782abb85b8ae8af78dc7646ec2e9","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","contentSha256":"015ebb2cea0979020e06a34bfcf4e49a6c38602be021fe85ffbeec9c68d8c8bf","textHash":"234e059b28ed18292efa30d28e7df36b6e9691244bbcd109b034aebad46f9d82","observedAt":"2026-11-12T10:50:07.849Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Gao, Zijun","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Gao, Zijun","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"cb118d7db38c4e1e6846ffc712363b614a6b782abb85b8ae8af78dc7646ec2e9:participation:3","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-12T10:50:07.849Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"cb118d7db38c4e1e6846ffc712363b614a6b782abb85b8ae8af78dc7646ec2e9","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","contentSha256":"015ebb2cea0979020e06a34bfcf4e49a6c38602be021fe85ffbeec9c68d8c8bf","textHash":"234e059b28ed18292efa30d28e7df36b6e9691244bbcd109b034aebad46f9d82","observedAt":"2026-11-12T10:50:07.849Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":4,"returned":4,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","snapshotId":"cb118d7db38c4e1e6846ffc712363b614a6b782abb85b8ae8af78dc7646ec2e9","contentSha256":"015ebb2cea0979020e06a34bfcf4e49a6c38602be021fe85ffbeec9c68d8c8bf","textHash":"234e059b28ed18292efa30d28e7df36b6e9691244bbcd109b034aebad46f9d82","observedAt":"2026-11-12T10:50:07.849Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":45,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/442322d244dae590faea97939c0b94de4343c6c1b6a5ba75664cca4b1e4def98/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/causal-discovery-bench-can-llms-autonomously-conduct-effective-442322d2","formats":{"html":"/readings/causal-discovery-bench-can-llms-autonomously-conduct-effective-442322d2","markdown":"/readings/causal-discovery-bench-can-llms-autonomously-conduct-effective-442322d2.md","json":"/readings/causal-discovery-bench-can-llms-autonomously-conduct-effective-442322d2.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[{"id":"term-llm","name":"Large language model","explanation":"A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#large-language-model"},{"id":"term-benchmark","name":"Benchmark","explanation":"A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.","referenceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09110"}],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"442322d244dae590faea97939c0b94de4343c6c1b6a5ba75664cca4b1e4def98","revision":"997bcdeb-4b63-4aca-8524-c1c9b14e3c52","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"Causal Discovery Bench: Can LLMs Autonomously Conduct Effective Experiments?","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/causal-discovery-bench-can-llms-autonomously-conduct-effective-442322d2"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","revision":"234e059b28ed18292efa30d28e7df36b6e9691244bbcd109b034aebad46f9d82","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Causal Discovery Bench: Can LLMs Autonomously Conduct Effective Experiments?","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"442322d244dae590faea97939c0b94de4343c6c1b6a5ba75664cca4b1e4def98","title":"Causal Discovery Bench: Can LLMs Autonomously Conduct Effective Experiments?","argument":"In their paper, Zhuoyang Liu, Ning Peng, Ming Shen and Zijun Gao introduce Causal-Discovery-Bench, a sandbox for testing whether LLM agents can design experiments and discover causal relationships. The authors argue that evaluating agents only on reasoning from prepared evidence misses a separate challenge: choosing informative experiments, managing resources, interpreting observations as they arrive, and deciding when to stop. Across 3,802 episodes with 13 models from 5 vendors, they report a hierarchy of difficulty, from designing a single experiment to resolving conflicting evidence autonomously. Their analysis attributes 94.5% of agent mistakes to experimental design rather than inference. They also report that relaxing resource constraints alone does not reliably fix failures in sequential discovery, while basic statistical tools improve performance across multiple model families. Advanced tools add little when models lack prerequisite lower-level capabilities. The results point to experiment design—not just drawing conclusions from curated evidence—as a central part of autonomous research, within the benchmark’s configurable sandbox.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The supplied evidence is the paper’s abstract and publisher page, not the full paper; it does not provide the benchmark’s detailed task design or results for individual models. The reported findings concern a configurable sandbox without domain-semantic cues; the supplied evidence does not establish how well they generalize to other settings.","speaker":{"name":"Liu, Zhuoyang, Peng, Ning, Shen, Ming, Gao, Zijun","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Causal Discovery Bench: Can LLMs Autonomously Conduct Effective Experiments?","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","publishedAt":"2026-10-13","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors introduce a sandbox to evaluate sequential experimental design and causal discovery without domain-semantic cues.","excerpt":"a verifiable sandbox with configurable structural equation models and resource constraints to evaluate sequential experimental design and causal discovery without domain-semantic cues","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The study covers 3,802 episodes and 13 models from 5 vendors, and reports four levels of difficulty.","excerpt":"Across 3,802 episodes with 13 models from 5 vendors, we analyze agent behavior along 40 metrics in seven families. Agents' performance exhibits a four-level difficulty hierarchy","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors attribute most agent mistakes to experimental design rather than inference.","excerpt":"attributes 94.5% of their mistakes to experimental design rather than to inference","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that basic statistical tools improve performance, while advanced tools add little if lower-level capabilities are missing.","excerpt":"basic statistical tools substantially improve performance across multiple model families, while advanced tools provide little additional benefit when models lack prerequisite lower-level capabilities.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","checkedAt":"2026-11-12T10:50:07.849Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"Would the reported benefits of basic statistical tools persist across different experimental settings beyond this benchmark’s configurable sandbox?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Causal Discovery Bench: Can LLMs Autonomously Conduct Effective Experiments?","summary":"In their paper, Zhuoyang Liu, Ning Peng, Ming Shen and Zijun Gao introduce Causal-Discovery-Bench, a sandbox for testing whether LLM agents can design experiments and discover causal relationships. The authors argue that evaluating agents only on reasoning from prepared evidence misses a separate challenge: choosing informative experiments, managing resources, interpreting observations as they arrive, and deciding when to stop. Across 3,802 episodes with 13 models from 5 vendors, they report a hierarchy of difficulty, from designing a single experiment to resolving conflicting evidence autonomously. Their analysis attributes 94.5% of agent mistakes to experimental design rather than inference. They also report that relaxing resource constraints alone does not reliably fix failures in sequential discovery, while basic statistical tools improve performance across multiple model families. Advanced tools add little when models lack prerequisite lower-level capabilities. The results point to experiment design—not just drawing conclusions from curated evidence—as a central part of autonomous research, within the benchmark’s configurable sandbox.","question":"Would the reported benefits of basic statistical tools persist across different experimental settings beyond this benchmark’s configurable sandbox?","claims":[{"text":"The authors introduce a sandbox to evaluate sequential experimental design and causal discovery without domain-semantic cues.","excerpt":"a verifiable sandbox with configurable structural equation models and resource constraints to evaluate sequential experimental design and causal discovery without domain-semantic cues","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The study covers 3,802 episodes and 13 models from 5 vendors, and reports four levels of difficulty.","excerpt":"Across 3,802 episodes with 13 models from 5 vendors, we analyze agent behavior along 40 metrics in seven families. Agents' performance exhibits a four-level difficulty hierarchy","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors attribute most agent mistakes to experimental design rather than inference.","excerpt":"attributes 94.5% of their mistakes to experimental design rather than to inference","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that basic statistical tools improve performance, while advanced tools add little if lower-level capabilities are missing.","excerpt":"basic statistical tools substantially improve performance across multiple model families, while advanced tools provide little additional benefit when models lack prerequisite lower-level capabilities.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The supplied evidence is the paper’s abstract and publisher page, not the full paper; it does not provide the benchmark’s detailed task design or results for individual models.","The reported findings concern a configurable sandbox without domain-semantic cues; the supplied evidence does not establish how well they generalize to other settings."],"mediaId":"97564ba477f543718c25f71d84f8f41db1491348e6a87aff296442000ab93e31","correctionReason":null,"id":"442322d244dae590faea97939c0b94de4343c6c1b6a5ba75664cca4b1e4def98","publicationId":"997bcdeb-4b63-4aca-8524-c1c9b14e3c52","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","sourceTitle":"Causal Discovery Bench: Can LLMs Autonomously Conduct Effective Experiments?","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-13","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-10T08:39:38.067Z","createdAt":"2026-11-12T09:46:29.102Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"97564ba477f543718c25f71d84f8f41db1491348e6a87aff296442000ab93e31","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-12T09:33:11.793Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","checkedAt":"2026-11-12T10:50:07.849Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v6","mediaId":"97564ba477f543718c25f71d84f8f41db1491348e6a87aff296442000ab93e31","confidence":0.8300000000000001,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"9776b5626272b4e3a3155236cb2a9b0396b53e376f944a1af54897347ac9f9f7","decidedAt":"2026-11-12T09:33:14.440Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"234e059b28ed18292efa30d28e7df36b6e9691244bbcd109b034aebad46f9d82","observationId":"8eb057e709cc9e483273a2d9a44bb3951ebb98f9a4281d820f72b411e16ef56d","retrievedAt":"2026-11-12T09:33:11.434Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"2d7c1089-8b65-4181-85a9-89d20ffaaf23"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"3751efb4-6f3d-45f2-8d74-17e2b230e06f"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-11-12T09:46:29.102Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Liu, Zhuoyang","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Peng, Ning","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Shen, Ming","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Gao, Zijun","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Liu, Zhuoyang","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Liu, Zhuoyang","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"cb118d7db38c4e1e6846ffc712363b614a6b782abb85b8ae8af78dc7646ec2e9:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-12T10:50:07.849Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"cb118d7db38c4e1e6846ffc712363b614a6b782abb85b8ae8af78dc7646ec2e9","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","contentSha256":"015ebb2cea0979020e06a34bfcf4e49a6c38602be021fe85ffbeec9c68d8c8bf","textHash":"234e059b28ed18292efa30d28e7df36b6e9691244bbcd109b034aebad46f9d82","observedAt":"2026-11-12T10:50:07.849Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Peng, Ning","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Peng, Ning","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"cb118d7db38c4e1e6846ffc712363b614a6b782abb85b8ae8af78dc7646ec2e9:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-12T10:50:07.849Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"cb118d7db38c4e1e6846ffc712363b614a6b782abb85b8ae8af78dc7646ec2e9","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","contentSha256":"015ebb2cea0979020e06a34bfcf4e49a6c38602be021fe85ffbeec9c68d8c8bf","textHash":"234e059b28ed18292efa30d28e7df36b6e9691244bbcd109b034aebad46f9d82","observedAt":"2026-11-12T10:50:07.849Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Shen, Ming","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Shen, Ming","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"cb118d7db38c4e1e6846ffc712363b614a6b782abb85b8ae8af78dc7646ec2e9:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-12T10:50:07.849Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"cb118d7db38c4e1e6846ffc712363b614a6b782abb85b8ae8af78dc7646ec2e9","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","contentSha256":"015ebb2cea0979020e06a34bfcf4e49a6c38602be021fe85ffbeec9c68d8c8bf","textHash":"234e059b28ed18292efa30d28e7df36b6e9691244bbcd109b034aebad46f9d82","observedAt":"2026-11-12T10:50:07.849Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Gao, Zijun","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Gao, Zijun","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"cb118d7db38c4e1e6846ffc712363b614a6b782abb85b8ae8af78dc7646ec2e9:participation:3","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-12T10:50:07.849Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"cb118d7db38c4e1e6846ffc712363b614a6b782abb85b8ae8af78dc7646ec2e9","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","contentSha256":"015ebb2cea0979020e06a34bfcf4e49a6c38602be021fe85ffbeec9c68d8c8bf","textHash":"234e059b28ed18292efa30d28e7df36b6e9691244bbcd109b034aebad46f9d82","observedAt":"2026-11-12T10:50:07.849Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":4,"returned":4,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09934","snapshotId":"cb118d7db38c4e1e6846ffc712363b614a6b782abb85b8ae8af78dc7646ec2e9","contentSha256":"015ebb2cea0979020e06a34bfcf4e49a6c38602be021fe85ffbeec9c68d8c8bf","textHash":"234e059b28ed18292efa30d28e7df36b6e9691244bbcd109b034aebad46f9d82","observedAt":"2026-11-12T10:50:07.849Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":45,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/442322d244dae590faea97939c0b94de4343c6c1b6a5ba75664cca4b1e4def98/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"997bcdeb-4b63-4aca-8524-c1c9b14e3c52","verdict":"passed","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The reading correctly credits the paper and its findings to Zhuoyang Liu, Ning Peng, Ming Shen and Zijun Gao. Results are framed as what the authors introduce, report or attribute, not as established fact.","excerpt":"Authors:Zhuoyang Liu, Ning Peng, Ming Shen, Zijun Gao"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"pass","explanation":"The reading leads with the actor and the development: a benchmark testing whether LLM agents can run experiments. It explains the skills involved in plain language, and the closing phrase 'drawing conclusions from curated evidence' clarifies what inference means here. It keeps the key results and scope: the four-level hierarchy, the 94.5% figure, the effect of resource constraints and the effect of tools. The title matches the source. The question is a genuine open issue about generalization. Terms such as 'sandbox' and 'LLM agents' could use term-library tooltips, but they do not block understanding.","excerpt":"they must not only reason over existing evidence, but also design informative experiments, allocate resources, analyze sequential observations, and decide when to stop and make conclusions"},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"originalPublished is 2026-10-13. That matches the v1 submission date on the arXiv page. The later feed date of 2026-11-10 is correctly not used.","excerpt":"[v1]\nTue, 13 Oct 2026 15:54:50 UTC (2,253 KB)"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"Each claim matches the abstract, including the episode, model and vendor counts, the 94.5% attribution, the resource-constraint finding and the tool findings. The closing interpretation is limited to the benchmark's sandbox and follows from the stated performance gap. The limitations correctly note that only the abstract is available and that generalization is untested. No unsupported benefits or costs are implied.","excerpt":"We identify a substantial performance gap between causal inference from correctly curated evidence and navigating causal discovery through autonomous experimentation"},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified arXiv abstract page. It is the direct original source and the most relevant access point. No other source media was found.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-12T09:46:29.102Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}