{"id":"7908b0809a15e34f9cac38f81973802d242790b0ac62def4912e7635a596f0a0","title":"Chen, Zhu and Zheng’s arXiv cs.AI paper: people who favor art are more likely to think a human made it","argument":"In a paper submitted to arXiv on 28 October 2026, Zihan Chen, Di Zhu and Lei Nico Zheng report that people’s favorite images were more likely to be judged human-made, even when generated by AI. In an online test, 11,123 people judged 50 pictures and were asked to choose favorites. Among the 9,152 respondents who judged their favorite, a picture was 22.1 percentage points more likely to be judged human-made when it was that respondent’s favorite, holding the respondent and picture fixed.\n\nThe authors say the association appeared for both AI-generated and human-made favorites and across all 50 pictures. Respondents most negative about AI art chose fewer AI-generated favorites, but more often believed those favorites were human-made. In every opinion group, a third to two fifths named an AI-generated favorite they believed human-made. The authors also reanalyzed an experiment in which 230 people rated AI-generated poems before judging who wrote them, and found the same pattern, though those poems received higher ratings. The results suggest that, when authorship is hidden, liking and perceived human authorship can travel together. The authors say this qualifies research on bias against AI art that uses explicit labels, and may inform AI disclosure policy.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The reported association does not establish that liking causes people to infer human authorship, or that perceived authorship causes enjoyment. The evidence described here comes from an online test of 50 pictures and a reanalysis of a published poetry experiment; it does not establish how disclosure affects responses in other settings.","speaker":{"name":"Chen, Zihan, Zhu, Di, Zheng, Lei Nico","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Beauty Is Human: When People Love AI-Generated Art, They Think a Human Made It","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","publishedAt":"2026-10-28","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"In an online AI art test, participants judged whether pictures were human-made and chose favorites.","excerpt":"11,123 people judged whether each of 50 pictures (26 AI-generated) was made by a human and were asked for their favourite.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Among respondents who judged their favorite, it was more likely to be judged human-made, holding the respondent and picture fixed.","excerpt":"a picture was 22.1 percentage points more likely to be judged human-made when it was the respondent's favourite, holding respondent and picture fixed.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that the association appeared for AI-generated and human-made favorites and across all pictures.","excerpt":"The association was similar for AI-generated and human-made favourites, was positive for all 50 pictures, and appeared under every reported detection strategy.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"A reanalysis of a poetry experiment found the same pattern, while the AI poems received higher ratings.","excerpt":"found the same pattern, although the AI poems were rated higher.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that the results qualify research on bias against AI art that uses explicit labels and may inform AI disclosure policy.","excerpt":"The findings qualify research on bias against AI art, which typically uses explicit labels, and inform AI disclosure policy.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","checkedAt":"2026-11-13T09:24:10.194Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"Would showing people who made an artwork change how much they like it?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Chen, Zhu and Zheng’s arXiv cs.AI paper: people who favor art are more likely to think a human made it","summary":"In a paper submitted to arXiv on 28 October 2026, Zihan Chen, Di Zhu and Lei Nico Zheng report that people’s favorite images were more likely to be judged human-made, even when generated by AI. In an online test, 11,123 people judged 50 pictures and were asked to choose favorites. Among the 9,152 respondents who judged their favorite, a picture was 22.1 percentage points more likely to be judged human-made when it was that respondent’s favorite, holding the respondent and picture fixed.\n\nThe authors say the association appeared for both AI-generated and human-made favorites and across all 50 pictures. Respondents most negative about AI art chose fewer AI-generated favorites, but more often believed those favorites were human-made. In every opinion group, a third to two fifths named an AI-generated favorite they believed human-made. The authors also reanalyzed an experiment in which 230 people rated AI-generated poems before judging who wrote them, and found the same pattern, though those poems received higher ratings. The results suggest that, when authorship is hidden, liking and perceived human authorship can travel together. The authors say this qualifies research on bias against AI art that uses explicit labels, and may inform AI disclosure policy.","question":"Would showing people who made an artwork change how much they like it?","claims":[{"text":"In an online AI art test, participants judged whether pictures were human-made and chose favorites.","excerpt":"11,123 people judged whether each of 50 pictures (26 AI-generated) was made by a human and were asked for their favourite.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Among respondents who judged their favorite, it was more likely to be judged human-made, holding the respondent and picture fixed.","excerpt":"a picture was 22.1 percentage points more likely to be judged human-made when it was the respondent's favourite, holding respondent and picture fixed.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that the association appeared for AI-generated and human-made favorites and across all pictures.","excerpt":"The association was similar for AI-generated and human-made favourites, was positive for all 50 pictures, and appeared under every reported detection strategy.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"A reanalysis of a poetry experiment found the same pattern, while the AI poems received higher ratings.","excerpt":"found the same pattern, although the AI poems were rated higher.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that the results qualify research on bias against AI art that uses explicit labels and may inform AI disclosure policy.","excerpt":"The findings qualify research on bias against AI art, which typically uses explicit labels, and inform AI disclosure policy.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The reported association does not establish that liking causes people to infer human authorship, or that perceived authorship causes enjoyment.","The evidence described here comes from an online test of 50 pictures and a reanalysis of a published poetry experiment; it does not establish how disclosure affects responses in other settings."],"mediaId":"86fd3a169ba707a7f5ff03ce21f7e4f81ab27a8f498ef33286e4822090bd6bcb","correctionReason":null,"id":"7908b0809a15e34f9cac38f81973802d242790b0ac62def4912e7635a596f0a0","publicationId":"4333e479-f083-4fe9-80d5-ee045c24a935","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","sourceTitle":"Beauty Is Human: When People Love AI-Generated Art, They Think a Human Made It","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-28","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-30T06:45:38.691Z","createdAt":"2026-11-13T07:16:12.441Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"86fd3a169ba707a7f5ff03ce21f7e4f81ab27a8f498ef33286e4822090bd6bcb","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-10-31T07:48:43.306Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","checkedAt":"2026-11-13T09:24:10.194Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["useful_perspective"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"86fd3a169ba707a7f5ff03ce21f7e4f81ab27a8f498ef33286e4822090bd6bcb","confidence":0.88,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"47c731cdb8aaf8673359bca8a6c8fb76c6e257a854bec152f02f329019888a64","decidedAt":"2026-10-31T07:48:45.149Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"8bf0fb1558dc59158b582d28d37809032b8f618d34a8e126095877f4ac0826c5","observationId":"e73eeab5061464da22d7e5819d1ad87fe42890b3859b0b5bc3c8785738af34b2","retrievedAt":"2026-10-31T07:48:43.066Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"8a09cfc0-b1ee-4f8f-8b42-8712bc33226a"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"24012349-d6c1-4d84-8eb8-882680386bdf"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-13T07:16:12.441Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Chen, Zihan","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Zhu, Di","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Zheng, Lei Nico","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Chen, Zihan","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Chen, Zihan","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"4c25d785fa53f1627c2807249fb8c75ae326bac3ddf217b46584bedc6e8c23a8:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-13T09:24:10.194Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"4c25d785fa53f1627c2807249fb8c75ae326bac3ddf217b46584bedc6e8c23a8","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","contentSha256":"5761efa52d265c8b0cbc8ca5cecfaa1e6341f87c2fbd570f161759984df7f143","textHash":"8bf0fb1558dc59158b582d28d37809032b8f618d34a8e126095877f4ac0826c5","observedAt":"2026-11-13T09:24:10.194Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Zhu, Di","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Zhu, Di","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"4c25d785fa53f1627c2807249fb8c75ae326bac3ddf217b46584bedc6e8c23a8:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-13T09:24:10.194Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"4c25d785fa53f1627c2807249fb8c75ae326bac3ddf217b46584bedc6e8c23a8","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","contentSha256":"5761efa52d265c8b0cbc8ca5cecfaa1e6341f87c2fbd570f161759984df7f143","textHash":"8bf0fb1558dc59158b582d28d37809032b8f618d34a8e126095877f4ac0826c5","observedAt":"2026-11-13T09:24:10.194Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Zheng, Lei Nico","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Zheng, Lei Nico","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"4c25d785fa53f1627c2807249fb8c75ae326bac3ddf217b46584bedc6e8c23a8:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-13T09:24:10.194Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"4c25d785fa53f1627c2807249fb8c75ae326bac3ddf217b46584bedc6e8c23a8","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","contentSha256":"5761efa52d265c8b0cbc8ca5cecfaa1e6341f87c2fbd570f161759984df7f143","textHash":"8bf0fb1558dc59158b582d28d37809032b8f618d34a8e126095877f4ac0826c5","observedAt":"2026-11-13T09:24:10.194Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":3,"returned":3,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","snapshotId":"4c25d785fa53f1627c2807249fb8c75ae326bac3ddf217b46584bedc6e8c23a8","contentSha256":"5761efa52d265c8b0cbc8ca5cecfaa1e6341f87c2fbd570f161759984df7f143","textHash":"8bf0fb1558dc59158b582d28d37809032b8f618d34a8e126095877f4ac0826c5","observedAt":"2026-11-13T09:24:10.194Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":43,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/7908b0809a15e34f9cac38f81973802d242790b0ac62def4912e7635a596f0a0/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/chen-zhu-and-zheng-s-arxiv-cs-ai-paper-people-who-favor-art-are-7908b080","formats":{"html":"/readings/chen-zhu-and-zheng-s-arxiv-cs-ai-paper-people-who-favor-art-are-7908b080","markdown":"/readings/chen-zhu-and-zheng-s-arxiv-cs-ai-paper-people-who-favor-art-are-7908b080.md","json":"/readings/chen-zhu-and-zheng-s-arxiv-cs-ai-paper-people-who-favor-art-are-7908b080.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"7908b0809a15e34f9cac38f81973802d242790b0ac62def4912e7635a596f0a0","revision":"4333e479-f083-4fe9-80d5-ee045c24a935","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"Chen, Zhu and Zheng’s arXiv cs.AI paper: people who favor art are more likely to think a human made it","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/chen-zhu-and-zheng-s-arxiv-cs-ai-paper-people-who-favor-art-are-7908b080"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","revision":"8bf0fb1558dc59158b582d28d37809032b8f618d34a8e126095877f4ac0826c5","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Beauty Is Human: When People Love AI-Generated Art, They Think a Human Made It","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"7908b0809a15e34f9cac38f81973802d242790b0ac62def4912e7635a596f0a0","title":"Chen, Zhu and Zheng’s arXiv cs.AI paper: people who favor art are more likely to think a human made it","argument":"In a paper submitted to arXiv on 28 October 2026, Zihan Chen, Di Zhu and Lei Nico Zheng report that people’s favorite images were more likely to be judged human-made, even when generated by AI. In an online test, 11,123 people judged 50 pictures and were asked to choose favorites. Among the 9,152 respondents who judged their favorite, a picture was 22.1 percentage points more likely to be judged human-made when it was that respondent’s favorite, holding the respondent and picture fixed.\n\nThe authors say the association appeared for both AI-generated and human-made favorites and across all 50 pictures. Respondents most negative about AI art chose fewer AI-generated favorites, but more often believed those favorites were human-made. In every opinion group, a third to two fifths named an AI-generated favorite they believed human-made. The authors also reanalyzed an experiment in which 230 people rated AI-generated poems before judging who wrote them, and found the same pattern, though those poems received higher ratings. The results suggest that, when authorship is hidden, liking and perceived human authorship can travel together. The authors say this qualifies research on bias against AI art that uses explicit labels, and may inform AI disclosure policy.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The reported association does not establish that liking causes people to infer human authorship, or that perceived authorship causes enjoyment. The evidence described here comes from an online test of 50 pictures and a reanalysis of a published poetry experiment; it does not establish how disclosure affects responses in other settings.","speaker":{"name":"Chen, Zihan, Zhu, Di, Zheng, Lei Nico","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Beauty Is Human: When People Love AI-Generated Art, They Think a Human Made It","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","publishedAt":"2026-10-28","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"In an online AI art test, participants judged whether pictures were human-made and chose favorites.","excerpt":"11,123 people judged whether each of 50 pictures (26 AI-generated) was made by a human and were asked for their favourite.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Among respondents who judged their favorite, it was more likely to be judged human-made, holding the respondent and picture fixed.","excerpt":"a picture was 22.1 percentage points more likely to be judged human-made when it was the respondent's favourite, holding respondent and picture fixed.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that the association appeared for AI-generated and human-made favorites and across all pictures.","excerpt":"The association was similar for AI-generated and human-made favourites, was positive for all 50 pictures, and appeared under every reported detection strategy.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"A reanalysis of a poetry experiment found the same pattern, while the AI poems received higher ratings.","excerpt":"found the same pattern, although the AI poems were rated higher.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that the results qualify research on bias against AI art that uses explicit labels and may inform AI disclosure policy.","excerpt":"The findings qualify research on bias against AI art, which typically uses explicit labels, and inform AI disclosure policy.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","checkedAt":"2026-11-13T09:24:10.194Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"Would showing people who made an artwork change how much they like it?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Chen, Zhu and Zheng’s arXiv cs.AI paper: people who favor art are more likely to think a human made it","summary":"In a paper submitted to arXiv on 28 October 2026, Zihan Chen, Di Zhu and Lei Nico Zheng report that people’s favorite images were more likely to be judged human-made, even when generated by AI. In an online test, 11,123 people judged 50 pictures and were asked to choose favorites. Among the 9,152 respondents who judged their favorite, a picture was 22.1 percentage points more likely to be judged human-made when it was that respondent’s favorite, holding the respondent and picture fixed.\n\nThe authors say the association appeared for both AI-generated and human-made favorites and across all 50 pictures. Respondents most negative about AI art chose fewer AI-generated favorites, but more often believed those favorites were human-made. In every opinion group, a third to two fifths named an AI-generated favorite they believed human-made. The authors also reanalyzed an experiment in which 230 people rated AI-generated poems before judging who wrote them, and found the same pattern, though those poems received higher ratings. The results suggest that, when authorship is hidden, liking and perceived human authorship can travel together. The authors say this qualifies research on bias against AI art that uses explicit labels, and may inform AI disclosure policy.","question":"Would showing people who made an artwork change how much they like it?","claims":[{"text":"In an online AI art test, participants judged whether pictures were human-made and chose favorites.","excerpt":"11,123 people judged whether each of 50 pictures (26 AI-generated) was made by a human and were asked for their favourite.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Among respondents who judged their favorite, it was more likely to be judged human-made, holding the respondent and picture fixed.","excerpt":"a picture was 22.1 percentage points more likely to be judged human-made when it was the respondent's favourite, holding respondent and picture fixed.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that the association appeared for AI-generated and human-made favorites and across all pictures.","excerpt":"The association was similar for AI-generated and human-made favourites, was positive for all 50 pictures, and appeared under every reported detection strategy.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"A reanalysis of a poetry experiment found the same pattern, while the AI poems received higher ratings.","excerpt":"found the same pattern, although the AI poems were rated higher.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that the results qualify research on bias against AI art that uses explicit labels and may inform AI disclosure policy.","excerpt":"The findings qualify research on bias against AI art, which typically uses explicit labels, and inform AI disclosure policy.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The reported association does not establish that liking causes people to infer human authorship, or that perceived authorship causes enjoyment.","The evidence described here comes from an online test of 50 pictures and a reanalysis of a published poetry experiment; it does not establish how disclosure affects responses in other settings."],"mediaId":"86fd3a169ba707a7f5ff03ce21f7e4f81ab27a8f498ef33286e4822090bd6bcb","correctionReason":null,"id":"7908b0809a15e34f9cac38f81973802d242790b0ac62def4912e7635a596f0a0","publicationId":"4333e479-f083-4fe9-80d5-ee045c24a935","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","sourceTitle":"Beauty Is Human: When People Love AI-Generated Art, They Think a Human Made It","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-28","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-30T06:45:38.691Z","createdAt":"2026-11-13T07:16:12.441Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"86fd3a169ba707a7f5ff03ce21f7e4f81ab27a8f498ef33286e4822090bd6bcb","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-10-31T07:48:43.306Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","checkedAt":"2026-11-13T09:24:10.194Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["useful_perspective"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"86fd3a169ba707a7f5ff03ce21f7e4f81ab27a8f498ef33286e4822090bd6bcb","confidence":0.88,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"47c731cdb8aaf8673359bca8a6c8fb76c6e257a854bec152f02f329019888a64","decidedAt":"2026-10-31T07:48:45.149Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"8bf0fb1558dc59158b582d28d37809032b8f618d34a8e126095877f4ac0826c5","observationId":"e73eeab5061464da22d7e5819d1ad87fe42890b3859b0b5bc3c8785738af34b2","retrievedAt":"2026-10-31T07:48:43.066Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"8a09cfc0-b1ee-4f8f-8b42-8712bc33226a"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"24012349-d6c1-4d84-8eb8-882680386bdf"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-13T07:16:12.441Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Chen, Zihan","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Zhu, Di","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Zheng, Lei Nico","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Chen, Zihan","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Chen, Zihan","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"4c25d785fa53f1627c2807249fb8c75ae326bac3ddf217b46584bedc6e8c23a8:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-13T09:24:10.194Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"4c25d785fa53f1627c2807249fb8c75ae326bac3ddf217b46584bedc6e8c23a8","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","contentSha256":"5761efa52d265c8b0cbc8ca5cecfaa1e6341f87c2fbd570f161759984df7f143","textHash":"8bf0fb1558dc59158b582d28d37809032b8f618d34a8e126095877f4ac0826c5","observedAt":"2026-11-13T09:24:10.194Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Zhu, Di","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Zhu, Di","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"4c25d785fa53f1627c2807249fb8c75ae326bac3ddf217b46584bedc6e8c23a8:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-13T09:24:10.194Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"4c25d785fa53f1627c2807249fb8c75ae326bac3ddf217b46584bedc6e8c23a8","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","contentSha256":"5761efa52d265c8b0cbc8ca5cecfaa1e6341f87c2fbd570f161759984df7f143","textHash":"8bf0fb1558dc59158b582d28d37809032b8f618d34a8e126095877f4ac0826c5","observedAt":"2026-11-13T09:24:10.194Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Zheng, Lei Nico","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Zheng, Lei Nico","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"4c25d785fa53f1627c2807249fb8c75ae326bac3ddf217b46584bedc6e8c23a8:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-13T09:24:10.194Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"4c25d785fa53f1627c2807249fb8c75ae326bac3ddf217b46584bedc6e8c23a8","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","contentSha256":"5761efa52d265c8b0cbc8ca5cecfaa1e6341f87c2fbd570f161759984df7f143","textHash":"8bf0fb1558dc59158b582d28d37809032b8f618d34a8e126095877f4ac0826c5","observedAt":"2026-11-13T09:24:10.194Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":3,"returned":3,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38113","snapshotId":"4c25d785fa53f1627c2807249fb8c75ae326bac3ddf217b46584bedc6e8c23a8","contentSha256":"5761efa52d265c8b0cbc8ca5cecfaa1e6341f87c2fbd570f161759984df7f143","textHash":"8bf0fb1558dc59158b582d28d37809032b8f618d34a8e126095877f4ac0826c5","observedAt":"2026-11-13T09:24:10.194Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":43,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/7908b0809a15e34f9cac38f81973802d242790b0ac62def4912e7635a596f0a0/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"4333e479-f083-4fe9-80d5-ee045c24a935","verdict":"uncertain","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The paper is correctly attributed to Zihan Chen, Di Zhu and Lei Nico Zheng on arXiv. Its findings are framed as the authors' reports. The primary category is cs.HC, cross-listed to cs.AI; the 'arXiv cs.AI' label follows the publisher metadata and is not a material misattribution.","excerpt":"Authors:Zihan Chen, Di Zhu, Lei Nico Zheng"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"uncertain","explanation":"Figures are accurate, but two fidelity gaps remain. First, the title 'people who favor art are more likely to think a human made it' can be misread as art lovers in general; the finding is about a respondent's own favourite picture. Second, the reading drops the authors' central interpretation that aesthetic response may serve as evidence of a human maker and that beliefs about the maker shape enjoyment. Smallest repair: retitle to 'people's favourite pictures are more likely to be judged human-made' and add the authors' two-way interpretation as their claim. Optionally add that skeptics' misjudgments were partly because others also judged those pictures human.","excerpt":"consistent with aesthetic response serving as evidence of a human maker and with beliefs about the maker shaping enjoyment"},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"originalPublished 2026-10-28 matches the v1 submission date. The draft's date sentence is consistent with it.","excerpt":"[Submitted on 28 Oct 2026]"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"All claims match the abstract: 11,123 participants, 50 pictures, the 22.1-point association with fixed effects, positive for all pictures, the opinion-group results, and the poetry reanalysis with 230 people. Softening 'inform' to 'may inform' is cautious, not an exaggeration. The limitations correctly note that the association is not causal. The disclosure question follows from the evidence without assuming an answer.","excerpt":"a picture was 22.1 percentage points more likely to be judged human-made when it was the respondent's favourite, holding respondent and picture fixed"},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified arXiv abstract page for this paper, which is the direct original source.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-13T07:16:12.441Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}