{"id":"a5786913fd37f565a128341bffd37346a81f68f52cca5f63d522ae97b03c35be","title":"Drechsel, Lewis, Melcangi and Pilossoph argue in Liberty Street Economics that investment responses vary","argument":"Published October 7, 2026, Thomas Drechsel, Daniel Lewis, Davide Melcangi, and Laura Pilossoph examine how firms’ investment responds to monetary policy. The authors report that all firms in their analysis cut investment when interest rates rise, but most adjust little and a few respond strongly. They estimate responses across firms and time without choosing one firm characteristic in advance. Most variation, they find, occurs within firms over time: a firm can respond substantially in one quarter and be relatively unresponsive for several quarters thereafter. Small and young firms cut investment the most when faced with monetary tightening, and shorter debt maturity, perceptions of discount rates and the cost of capital, and firms’ optimism also relate to responsiveness. The authors conclude that several firm characteristics matter concurrently, while much of investment responsiveness is driven by unobservable factors. Their analysis measures quarterly capital-stock growth for publicly listed firms in Compustat; how well the findings apply beyond those firms remains unknown.","topicIds":["investment-booms-and-busts"],"domain":"other","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"Text as retrieved on October 30, 2026; originally published October 7, 2026. The analysis measures investment as quarterly capital-stock growth for publicly listed firms in Compustat; the post does not establish whether its findings generalize to other firms. The post says much of the variation in investment responsiveness remains unexplained. Daniel Lewis disclosed consultancy fees from Banque de France, a potentially interested party; he stated the relationship did not affect the research and the party had no right to review it.","speaker":{"name":"Federal Reserve Bank of New York","roleAtSource":"Publisher"},"source":{"title":"Firm Heterogeneity and the Response of Investment to Monetary Policy","publisher":"Federal Reserve Bank of New York","format":"Article","url":"https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/10/firm-heterogeneity-and-the-response-of-investment-to-monetary-policy/","publishedAt":"2026-10-07T13:00:00.000Z","dateBasis":"Date supplied by the publisher’s feed."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors report that most firms respond little to monetary policy, while some firms respond strongly.","excerpt":"investment by most firms in most time periods responds little to monetary policy. For some firms in some periods, however, investment is very responsive to changes in interest rates.","url":"https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/10/firm-heterogeneity-and-the-response-of-investment-to-monetary-policy/","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors estimate that for about 5 percent of firm-quarter observations, a monetary shock raising the federal funds rate by 1 percentage point is associated with a 4 percentage point drop in capital growth.","excerpt":"For about 5 percent of all firms and quarters, a monetary shock that raises the federal funds rate by 1 percentage point induces a 4 percentage point drop in the growth rate of capital.","url":"https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/10/firm-heterogeneity-and-the-response-of-investment-to-monetary-policy/","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say most variation in responsiveness occurs within firms over time, so a firm can respond strongly in one quarter and little in later quarters.","excerpt":"most of the variation in the RIMP is within firms over time. This means that a specific firm’s investment can respond substantially to a monetary shock in a given quarter, but that same firm can be relatively unresponsive for several quarters thereafter.","url":"https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/10/firm-heterogeneity-and-the-response-of-investment-to-monetary-policy/","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that small and young firms cut investment the most when faced with monetary tightening, while much of the variation remains unexplained.","excerpt":"small and young firms have the most negative RIMP (in other words, they cut investment the most when faced with a monetary tightening).","url":"https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/10/firm-heterogeneity-and-the-response-of-investment-to-monetary-policy/","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say much of investment responsiveness is driven by factors they do not observe.","excerpt":"much of the investment responsiveness is driven by unobservable factors.","url":"https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/10/firm-heterogeneity-and-the-response-of-investment-to-monetary-policy/","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/10/firm-heterogeneity-and-the-response-of-investment-to-monetary-policy/","checkedAt":null,"items":[]},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How much of the variation in investment responses would remain unexplained if the authors’ approach were applied beyond publicly listed firms?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Drechsel, Lewis, Melcangi and Pilossoph argue in Liberty Street Economics that investment responses vary","summary":"Published October 7, 2026, Thomas Drechsel, Daniel Lewis, Davide Melcangi, and Laura Pilossoph examine how firms’ investment responds to monetary policy. The authors report that all firms in their analysis cut investment when interest rates rise, but most adjust little and a few respond strongly. They estimate responses across firms and time without choosing one firm characteristic in advance. Most variation, they find, occurs within firms over time: a firm can respond substantially in one quarter and be relatively unresponsive for several quarters thereafter. Small and young firms cut investment the most when faced with monetary tightening, and shorter debt maturity, perceptions of discount rates and the cost of capital, and firms’ optimism also relate to responsiveness. The authors conclude that several firm characteristics matter concurrently, while much of investment responsiveness is driven by unobservable factors. Their analysis measures quarterly capital-stock growth for publicly listed firms in Compustat; how well the findings apply beyond those firms remains unknown.","question":"How much of the variation in investment responses would remain unexplained if the authors’ approach were applied beyond publicly listed firms?","claims":[{"text":"The authors report that most firms respond little to monetary policy, while some firms respond strongly.","excerpt":"investment by most firms in most time periods responds little to monetary policy. For some firms in some periods, however, investment is very responsive to changes in interest rates.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors estimate that for about 5 percent of firm-quarter observations, a monetary shock raising the federal funds rate by 1 percentage point is associated with a 4 percentage point drop in capital growth.","excerpt":"For about 5 percent of all firms and quarters, a monetary shock that raises the federal funds rate by 1 percentage point induces a 4 percentage point drop in the growth rate of capital.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say most variation in responsiveness occurs within firms over time, so a firm can respond strongly in one quarter and little in later quarters.","excerpt":"most of the variation in the RIMP is within firms over time. This means that a specific firm’s investment can respond substantially to a monetary shock in a given quarter, but that same firm can be relatively unresponsive for several quarters thereafter.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that small and young firms cut investment the most when faced with monetary tightening, while much of the variation remains unexplained.","excerpt":"small and young firms have the most negative RIMP (in other words, they cut investment the most when faced with a monetary tightening).","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say much of investment responsiveness is driven by factors they do not observe.","excerpt":"much of the investment responsiveness is driven by unobservable factors.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["Text as retrieved on October 30, 2026; originally published October 7, 2026.","The analysis measures investment as quarterly capital-stock growth for publicly listed firms in Compustat; the post does not establish whether its findings generalize to other firms.","The post says much of the variation in investment responsiveness remains unexplained.","Daniel Lewis disclosed consultancy fees from Banque de France, a potentially interested party; he stated the relationship did not affect the research and the party had no right to review it."],"mediaId":null,"correctionReason":null,"id":"a5786913fd37f565a128341bffd37346a81f68f52cca5f63d522ae97b03c35be","publicationId":"d271b617-715c-fe35-1492-1b929088bc47","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/10/firm-heterogeneity-and-the-response-of-investment-to-monetary-policy/","sourceTitle":"Firm Heterogeneity and the Response of Investment to Monetary Policy","publisher":"Federal Reserve Bank of New York","publishedAt":"2026-10-07T13:00:00.000Z","originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-07T13:00:00.000Z","precision":"instant","basis":"backfill:feed_published"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-30T15:12:00.401Z","createdAt":"2026-11-05T03:38:23.659Z","historical":true,"entityIds":[],"topicIds":["investment-booms-and-busts"],"media":[],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/10/firm-heterogeneity-and-the-response-of-investment-to-monetary-policy/","checkedAt":null,"items":[]},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","mediaId":null,"inputHash":"5926472901b55f2ac8fb56733390b5a1b39b10edcf0c45ce928fe04b213e71f9","rubricVersion":"em-backfill-context/3","provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","reasonCodes":["bridge_admitted_by_model"],"confidence":0.89,"decidedAt":"2026-10-30T15:11:58.299Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"17d3874022e458efe74bd80fa60d01b9fe17942a7ffdd2c4805c059b802a6bea","observationId":"b1960a0f9cf4cf4c153e6d430f33feeca9284b284d097d17d4adacb1268e10d3","retrievedAt":"2026-10-30T15:13:45.675Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"openai/gpt-6-luna","runId":"337bc7ea-29d2-01cf-7a17-176014d19ed1"},"reviewer":{"model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5","runId":"06fd5a2b-1996-0d96-eca1-f1e2f0035fec"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-05T03:33:58.320Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/drechsel-lewis-melcangi-and-pilossoph-argue-in-liberty-street-a5786913","formats":{"html":"/readings/drechsel-lewis-melcangi-and-pilossoph-argue-in-liberty-street-a5786913","markdown":"/readings/drechsel-lewis-melcangi-and-pilossoph-argue-in-liberty-street-a5786913.md","json":"/readings/drechsel-lewis-melcangi-and-pilossoph-argue-in-liberty-street-a5786913.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[],"entities":[]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"a5786913fd37f565a128341bffd37346a81f68f52cca5f63d522ae97b03c35be","revision":"d271b617-715c-fe35-1492-1b929088bc47","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"Drechsel, Lewis, Melcangi and Pilossoph argue in Liberty Street Economics that investment responses vary","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/drechsel-lewis-melcangi-and-pilossoph-argue-in-liberty-street-a5786913"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/10/firm-heterogeneity-and-the-response-of-investment-to-monetary-policy/","revision":"17d3874022e458efe74bd80fa60d01b9fe17942a7ffdd2c4805c059b802a6bea","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Firm Heterogeneity and the Response of Investment to Monetary Policy","url":"https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/10/firm-heterogeneity-and-the-response-of-investment-to-monetary-policy/"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"a5786913fd37f565a128341bffd37346a81f68f52cca5f63d522ae97b03c35be","title":"Drechsel, Lewis, Melcangi and Pilossoph argue in Liberty Street Economics that investment responses vary","argument":"Published October 7, 2026, Thomas Drechsel, Daniel Lewis, Davide Melcangi, and Laura Pilossoph examine how firms’ investment responds to monetary policy. The authors report that all firms in their analysis cut investment when interest rates rise, but most adjust little and a few respond strongly. They estimate responses across firms and time without choosing one firm characteristic in advance. Most variation, they find, occurs within firms over time: a firm can respond substantially in one quarter and be relatively unresponsive for several quarters thereafter. Small and young firms cut investment the most when faced with monetary tightening, and shorter debt maturity, perceptions of discount rates and the cost of capital, and firms’ optimism also relate to responsiveness. The authors conclude that several firm characteristics matter concurrently, while much of investment responsiveness is driven by unobservable factors. Their analysis measures quarterly capital-stock growth for publicly listed firms in Compustat; how well the findings apply beyond those firms remains unknown.","topicIds":["investment-booms-and-busts"],"domain":"other","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"Text as retrieved on October 30, 2026; originally published October 7, 2026. The analysis measures investment as quarterly capital-stock growth for publicly listed firms in Compustat; the post does not establish whether its findings generalize to other firms. The post says much of the variation in investment responsiveness remains unexplained. Daniel Lewis disclosed consultancy fees from Banque de France, a potentially interested party; he stated the relationship did not affect the research and the party had no right to review it.","speaker":{"name":"Federal Reserve Bank of New York","roleAtSource":"Publisher"},"source":{"title":"Firm Heterogeneity and the Response of Investment to Monetary Policy","publisher":"Federal Reserve Bank of New York","format":"Article","url":"https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/10/firm-heterogeneity-and-the-response-of-investment-to-monetary-policy/","publishedAt":"2026-10-07T13:00:00.000Z","dateBasis":"Date supplied by the publisher’s feed."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors report that most firms respond little to monetary policy, while some firms respond strongly.","excerpt":"investment by most firms in most time periods responds little to monetary policy. For some firms in some periods, however, investment is very responsive to changes in interest rates.","url":"https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/10/firm-heterogeneity-and-the-response-of-investment-to-monetary-policy/","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors estimate that for about 5 percent of firm-quarter observations, a monetary shock raising the federal funds rate by 1 percentage point is associated with a 4 percentage point drop in capital growth.","excerpt":"For about 5 percent of all firms and quarters, a monetary shock that raises the federal funds rate by 1 percentage point induces a 4 percentage point drop in the growth rate of capital.","url":"https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/10/firm-heterogeneity-and-the-response-of-investment-to-monetary-policy/","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say most variation in responsiveness occurs within firms over time, so a firm can respond strongly in one quarter and little in later quarters.","excerpt":"most of the variation in the RIMP is within firms over time. This means that a specific firm’s investment can respond substantially to a monetary shock in a given quarter, but that same firm can be relatively unresponsive for several quarters thereafter.","url":"https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/10/firm-heterogeneity-and-the-response-of-investment-to-monetary-policy/","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that small and young firms cut investment the most when faced with monetary tightening, while much of the variation remains unexplained.","excerpt":"small and young firms have the most negative RIMP (in other words, they cut investment the most when faced with a monetary tightening).","url":"https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/10/firm-heterogeneity-and-the-response-of-investment-to-monetary-policy/","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say much of investment responsiveness is driven by factors they do not observe.","excerpt":"much of the investment responsiveness is driven by unobservable factors.","url":"https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/10/firm-heterogeneity-and-the-response-of-investment-to-monetary-policy/","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/10/firm-heterogeneity-and-the-response-of-investment-to-monetary-policy/","checkedAt":null,"items":[]},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How much of the variation in investment responses would remain unexplained if the authors’ approach were applied beyond publicly listed firms?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Drechsel, Lewis, Melcangi and Pilossoph argue in Liberty Street Economics that investment responses vary","summary":"Published October 7, 2026, Thomas Drechsel, Daniel Lewis, Davide Melcangi, and Laura Pilossoph examine how firms’ investment responds to monetary policy. The authors report that all firms in their analysis cut investment when interest rates rise, but most adjust little and a few respond strongly. They estimate responses across firms and time without choosing one firm characteristic in advance. Most variation, they find, occurs within firms over time: a firm can respond substantially in one quarter and be relatively unresponsive for several quarters thereafter. Small and young firms cut investment the most when faced with monetary tightening, and shorter debt maturity, perceptions of discount rates and the cost of capital, and firms’ optimism also relate to responsiveness. The authors conclude that several firm characteristics matter concurrently, while much of investment responsiveness is driven by unobservable factors. Their analysis measures quarterly capital-stock growth for publicly listed firms in Compustat; how well the findings apply beyond those firms remains unknown.","question":"How much of the variation in investment responses would remain unexplained if the authors’ approach were applied beyond publicly listed firms?","claims":[{"text":"The authors report that most firms respond little to monetary policy, while some firms respond strongly.","excerpt":"investment by most firms in most time periods responds little to monetary policy. For some firms in some periods, however, investment is very responsive to changes in interest rates.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors estimate that for about 5 percent of firm-quarter observations, a monetary shock raising the federal funds rate by 1 percentage point is associated with a 4 percentage point drop in capital growth.","excerpt":"For about 5 percent of all firms and quarters, a monetary shock that raises the federal funds rate by 1 percentage point induces a 4 percentage point drop in the growth rate of capital.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say most variation in responsiveness occurs within firms over time, so a firm can respond strongly in one quarter and little in later quarters.","excerpt":"most of the variation in the RIMP is within firms over time. This means that a specific firm’s investment can respond substantially to a monetary shock in a given quarter, but that same firm can be relatively unresponsive for several quarters thereafter.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that small and young firms cut investment the most when faced with monetary tightening, while much of the variation remains unexplained.","excerpt":"small and young firms have the most negative RIMP (in other words, they cut investment the most when faced with a monetary tightening).","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say much of investment responsiveness is driven by factors they do not observe.","excerpt":"much of the investment responsiveness is driven by unobservable factors.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["Text as retrieved on October 30, 2026; originally published October 7, 2026.","The analysis measures investment as quarterly capital-stock growth for publicly listed firms in Compustat; the post does not establish whether its findings generalize to other firms.","The post says much of the variation in investment responsiveness remains unexplained.","Daniel Lewis disclosed consultancy fees from Banque de France, a potentially interested party; he stated the relationship did not affect the research and the party had no right to review it."],"mediaId":null,"correctionReason":null,"id":"a5786913fd37f565a128341bffd37346a81f68f52cca5f63d522ae97b03c35be","publicationId":"d271b617-715c-fe35-1492-1b929088bc47","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/10/firm-heterogeneity-and-the-response-of-investment-to-monetary-policy/","sourceTitle":"Firm Heterogeneity and the Response of Investment to Monetary Policy","publisher":"Federal Reserve Bank of New York","publishedAt":"2026-10-07T13:00:00.000Z","originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-07T13:00:00.000Z","precision":"instant","basis":"backfill:feed_published"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-30T15:12:00.401Z","createdAt":"2026-11-05T03:38:23.659Z","historical":true,"entityIds":[],"topicIds":["investment-booms-and-busts"],"media":[],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2026/10/firm-heterogeneity-and-the-response-of-investment-to-monetary-policy/","checkedAt":null,"items":[]},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","mediaId":null,"inputHash":"5926472901b55f2ac8fb56733390b5a1b39b10edcf0c45ce928fe04b213e71f9","rubricVersion":"em-backfill-context/3","provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","reasonCodes":["bridge_admitted_by_model"],"confidence":0.89,"decidedAt":"2026-10-30T15:11:58.299Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"17d3874022e458efe74bd80fa60d01b9fe17942a7ffdd2c4805c059b802a6bea","observationId":"b1960a0f9cf4cf4c153e6d430f33feeca9284b284d097d17d4adacb1268e10d3","retrievedAt":"2026-10-30T15:13:45.675Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"openai/gpt-6-luna","runId":"337bc7ea-29d2-01cf-7a17-176014d19ed1"},"reviewer":{"model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5","runId":"06fd5a2b-1996-0d96-eca1-f1e2f0035fec"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-05T03:33:58.320Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"d271b617-715c-fe35-1492-1b929088bc47","verdict":"uncertain","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The reading correctly attributes the post to Thomas Drechsel, Daniel Lewis, Davide Melcangi and Laura Pilossoph in the New York Fed's Liberty Street Economics. Findings are framed as the authors' reports. It is one article, not a listing.","excerpt":"Thomas Drechsel, Daniel Lewis, Davide Melcangi, and Laura Pilossoph"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"uncertain","explanation":"The findings are faithfully condensed, but the reading omits the authors' stated takeaway. Smallest repair: add one sentence that the authors say the whole distribution of responses matters, not only the average effect. The title stops at 'investment responses vary' without saying to what. 'Monetary policy surprises' and 'monetary tightening' are not explained in plain terms. 'Discount rates', 'cost of capital' and 'debt maturity' are central technical terms. The definitions list is empty, so these terms need term-library entries.","excerpt":"Our findings therefore underscore the importance of considering the entire distribution of investment responses rather than focusing on the average effect."},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The reading gives October 7, 2026, which matches the dateline and the originalPublished UTC day. The retrieval date is disclosed as later. The page is a publisher page, not an archive copy. The reading does not use the 'You may also be interested in' links or any hindsight framing.","excerpt":"October 7, 2026"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"Each claim matches the source text. Claim 2's 'is associated with' softens the source's 'induces', but it does not overstate. The other drivers (debt maturity, perceived discount rates and cost of capital, optimism) are reported from the Staff Report as correlates, consistent with the source. The generalization limit and the question are framed as open, not asserted. Nothing indicates edits after publication.","excerpt":"firms with shorter debt maturity are more sensitive to monetary policy"},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"No media was selected and no verified media candidates were supplied, so nothing was misidentified or invented.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-05T03:33:58.320Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}