{"id":"a27bf42efa423b344e440fee835fcc5099f49ee90dd1eb9f51f997d634a1b20b","title":"Fengxin Li presents Iris for decisions among visual candidates","argument":"In a paper, Fengxin Li presents Iris, a model for choosing among image, text, or mixed candidates. The paper reports that a design which encodes each candidate after the request state, but not after other candidates, preserves order invariance and reaches 92.1/87.0/90.2% on a visual-candidate benchmark.\n\nLi says the design shares the request-state computation through a forked cache and runs at a third of OneJev's latency. The paper also reports that reusing image candidates reduces latency 37x at K=256 and 191x at K=2048.\n\nEscape Meridian interpretation: These results suggest that this design may offer a useful balance between accuracy, stable choices when candidate order changes, and speed for the tested task. Whether it performs similarly beyond this benchmark is unknown.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The reported accuracy results come from a visual-candidate benchmark built from Multimodal-Mind2Web, with screenshot crops as candidates, K=16, and three splits; the evidence does not establish performance on other tasks. The evidence is the arXiv abstract and does not provide the full experimental methods or results needed to assess the reported comparisons in detail.","speaker":{"name":"Li, Fengxin","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Seeing the Options: Typed Decisions over Visual Candidates with Reusable Option Memory","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","publishedAt":"2026-10-24","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"Fengxin Li presents Iris as supporting image, text, or mixed candidates while keeping Jeva's decision module unchanged.","excerpt":"Iris admits image, text, or mixed candidates and leaves Jeva's decision module untouched.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"On a visual-candidate benchmark, the design that encodes each candidate after the request state reports scores of 92.1/87.0/90.2% and exact order invariance.","excerpt":"encodes each candidate after the state - but never after another candidate - keeps order invariance exactly, shares the state pass through a forked cache, and reaches 92.1/87.0/90.2%","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The paper reports that this design runs at a third of OneJev's latency.","excerpt":"reaches 92.1/87.0/90.2% at a third of OneJev's latency","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Reusing image candidates reduces latency substantially at the reported candidate counts.","excerpt":"Reusing image candidates across requests cuts latency 37x at K=256 and 191x at K=2048.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Escape Meridian interpretation: The reported results suggest a possible balance of accuracy, order invariance, and speed for the tested task; performance beyond that benchmark is not established by this evidence.","excerpt":"On a visual-candidate benchmark built from Multimodal-Mind2Web (every candidate is the element's screenshot crop, K=16, three splits)","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","relationship":"Escape Meridian interpretation"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","checkedAt":"2026-11-14T00:34:08.022Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"Does Iris retain its reported accuracy, order invariance, and latency advantages on visual-candidate tasks beyond the Multimodal-Mind2Web benchmark?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Fengxin Li presents Iris for decisions among visual candidates","summary":"In a paper, Fengxin Li presents Iris, a model for choosing among image, text, or mixed candidates. The paper reports that a design which encodes each candidate after the request state, but not after other candidates, preserves order invariance and reaches 92.1/87.0/90.2% on a visual-candidate benchmark.\n\nLi says the design shares the request-state computation through a forked cache and runs at a third of OneJev's latency. The paper also reports that reusing image candidates reduces latency 37x at K=256 and 191x at K=2048.\n\nEscape Meridian interpretation: These results suggest that this design may offer a useful balance between accuracy, stable choices when candidate order changes, and speed for the tested task. Whether it performs similarly beyond this benchmark is unknown.","question":"Does Iris retain its reported accuracy, order invariance, and latency advantages on visual-candidate tasks beyond the Multimodal-Mind2Web benchmark?","claims":[{"text":"Fengxin Li presents Iris as supporting image, text, or mixed candidates while keeping Jeva's decision module unchanged.","excerpt":"Iris admits image, text, or mixed candidates and leaves Jeva's decision module untouched.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"On a visual-candidate benchmark, the design that encodes each candidate after the request state reports scores of 92.1/87.0/90.2% and exact order invariance.","excerpt":"encodes each candidate after the state - but never after another candidate - keeps order invariance exactly, shares the state pass through a forked cache, and reaches 92.1/87.0/90.2%","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The paper reports that this design runs at a third of OneJev's latency.","excerpt":"reaches 92.1/87.0/90.2% at a third of OneJev's latency","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Reusing image candidates reduces latency substantially at the reported candidate counts.","excerpt":"Reusing image candidates across requests cuts latency 37x at K=256 and 191x at K=2048.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Escape Meridian interpretation: The reported results suggest a possible balance of accuracy, order invariance, and speed for the tested task; performance beyond that benchmark is not established by this evidence.","excerpt":"On a visual-candidate benchmark built from Multimodal-Mind2Web (every candidate is the element's screenshot crop, K=16, three splits)","support":"interpretation"}],"limitations":["The reported accuracy results come from a visual-candidate benchmark built from Multimodal-Mind2Web, with screenshot crops as candidates, K=16, and three splits; the evidence does not establish performance on other tasks.","The evidence is the arXiv abstract and does not provide the full experimental methods or results needed to assess the reported comparisons in detail."],"mediaId":"b9f37e238ed8209bfda7ec18d7ea1afd0a5f26ad94beb55994e264ccf34193c7","correctionReason":null,"id":"a27bf42efa423b344e440fee835fcc5099f49ee90dd1eb9f51f997d634a1b20b","publicationId":"d6ff4a10-34b2-4705-885d-6a003b16af49","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","sourceTitle":"Seeing the Options: Typed Decisions over Visual Candidates with Reusable Option Memory","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-24","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-28T07:32:43.710Z","createdAt":"2026-11-13T23:31:55.662Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"b9f37e238ed8209bfda7ec18d7ea1afd0a5f26ad94beb55994e264ccf34193c7","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-10-30T06:16:45.277Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","checkedAt":"2026-11-14T00:34:08.022Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"b9f37e238ed8209bfda7ec18d7ea1afd0a5f26ad94beb55994e264ccf34193c7","confidence":0.8300000000000001,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"8f09eaeb1682598f5345809eeb3e3bc9adfc14c7627843333f2c193447463e59","decidedAt":"2026-10-30T06:16:46.112Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"d9c419a09a3e28d5318524efc26829610cfe485971a1f7723b29a5c55649a671","observationId":"65355f9ae8ad90540efbd78ff74a15e815abba94e77450287cab5dbc26ce6bb9","retrievedAt":"2026-10-30T06:16:45.137Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"083d0c6e-2709-4777-8555-4381a3d670bc"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"965b7880-afb2-4e01-8e8d-51cdcdd4a762"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-13T23:31:55.662Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Li, Fengxin","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Li, Fengxin","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Li, Fengxin","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"c6f37b1ddb9f8ae71628023f797b5c89f21b0928793d9d293faa9a4491b96487:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-10-30T06:16:45.137Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"c6f37b1ddb9f8ae71628023f797b5c89f21b0928793d9d293faa9a4491b96487","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","contentSha256":"bbd12dc00ca0c7da590c0732a8f96d5a1c1754c6b628ee3795f66d819d752c56","textHash":"d9c419a09a3e28d5318524efc26829610cfe485971a1f7723b29a5c55649a671","observedAt":"2026-10-30T06:16:45.137Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":1,"returned":1,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","snapshotId":"c6f37b1ddb9f8ae71628023f797b5c89f21b0928793d9d293faa9a4491b96487","contentSha256":"bbd12dc00ca0c7da590c0732a8f96d5a1c1754c6b628ee3795f66d819d752c56","textHash":"d9c419a09a3e28d5318524efc26829610cfe485971a1f7723b29a5c55649a671","observedAt":"2026-10-30T06:16:45.137Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":43,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/a27bf42efa423b344e440fee835fcc5099f49ee90dd1eb9f51f997d634a1b20b/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/fengxin-li-presents-iris-for-decisions-among-visual-candidates-a27bf42e","formats":{"html":"/readings/fengxin-li-presents-iris-for-decisions-among-visual-candidates-a27bf42e","markdown":"/readings/fengxin-li-presents-iris-for-decisions-among-visual-candidates-a27bf42e.md","json":"/readings/fengxin-li-presents-iris-for-decisions-among-visual-candidates-a27bf42e.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"conditions":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[{"id":"term-benchmark","name":"Benchmark","explanation":"A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.","referenceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09110"},{"id":"term-latency","name":"Latency","explanation":"The delay between sending a request and receiving the result.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#latency"},{"id":"term-multimodal-model","name":"Multimodal model","explanation":"A model that works with more than one kind of input or output, such as text, images and audio.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#multimodal-model"}],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"a27bf42efa423b344e440fee835fcc5099f49ee90dd1eb9f51f997d634a1b20b","revision":"d6ff4a10-34b2-4705-885d-6a003b16af49","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"Fengxin Li presents Iris for decisions among visual candidates","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/fengxin-li-presents-iris-for-decisions-among-visual-candidates-a27bf42e"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","revision":"d9c419a09a3e28d5318524efc26829610cfe485971a1f7723b29a5c55649a671","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Seeing the Options: Typed Decisions over Visual Candidates with Reusable Option Memory","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"a27bf42efa423b344e440fee835fcc5099f49ee90dd1eb9f51f997d634a1b20b","title":"Fengxin Li presents Iris for decisions among visual candidates","argument":"In a paper, Fengxin Li presents Iris, a model for choosing among image, text, or mixed candidates. The paper reports that a design which encodes each candidate after the request state, but not after other candidates, preserves order invariance and reaches 92.1/87.0/90.2% on a visual-candidate benchmark.\n\nLi says the design shares the request-state computation through a forked cache and runs at a third of OneJev's latency. The paper also reports that reusing image candidates reduces latency 37x at K=256 and 191x at K=2048.\n\nEscape Meridian interpretation: These results suggest that this design may offer a useful balance between accuracy, stable choices when candidate order changes, and speed for the tested task. Whether it performs similarly beyond this benchmark is unknown.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The reported accuracy results come from a visual-candidate benchmark built from Multimodal-Mind2Web, with screenshot crops as candidates, K=16, and three splits; the evidence does not establish performance on other tasks. The evidence is the arXiv abstract and does not provide the full experimental methods or results needed to assess the reported comparisons in detail.","speaker":{"name":"Li, Fengxin","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Seeing the Options: Typed Decisions over Visual Candidates with Reusable Option Memory","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","publishedAt":"2026-10-24","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"Fengxin Li presents Iris as supporting image, text, or mixed candidates while keeping Jeva's decision module unchanged.","excerpt":"Iris admits image, text, or mixed candidates and leaves Jeva's decision module untouched.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"On a visual-candidate benchmark, the design that encodes each candidate after the request state reports scores of 92.1/87.0/90.2% and exact order invariance.","excerpt":"encodes each candidate after the state - but never after another candidate - keeps order invariance exactly, shares the state pass through a forked cache, and reaches 92.1/87.0/90.2%","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The paper reports that this design runs at a third of OneJev's latency.","excerpt":"reaches 92.1/87.0/90.2% at a third of OneJev's latency","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Reusing image candidates reduces latency substantially at the reported candidate counts.","excerpt":"Reusing image candidates across requests cuts latency 37x at K=256 and 191x at K=2048.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Escape Meridian interpretation: The reported results suggest a possible balance of accuracy, order invariance, and speed for the tested task; performance beyond that benchmark is not established by this evidence.","excerpt":"On a visual-candidate benchmark built from Multimodal-Mind2Web (every candidate is the element's screenshot crop, K=16, three splits)","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","relationship":"Escape Meridian interpretation"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","checkedAt":"2026-11-14T00:34:08.022Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"Does Iris retain its reported accuracy, order invariance, and latency advantages on visual-candidate tasks beyond the Multimodal-Mind2Web benchmark?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Fengxin Li presents Iris for decisions among visual candidates","summary":"In a paper, Fengxin Li presents Iris, a model for choosing among image, text, or mixed candidates. The paper reports that a design which encodes each candidate after the request state, but not after other candidates, preserves order invariance and reaches 92.1/87.0/90.2% on a visual-candidate benchmark.\n\nLi says the design shares the request-state computation through a forked cache and runs at a third of OneJev's latency. The paper also reports that reusing image candidates reduces latency 37x at K=256 and 191x at K=2048.\n\nEscape Meridian interpretation: These results suggest that this design may offer a useful balance between accuracy, stable choices when candidate order changes, and speed for the tested task. Whether it performs similarly beyond this benchmark is unknown.","question":"Does Iris retain its reported accuracy, order invariance, and latency advantages on visual-candidate tasks beyond the Multimodal-Mind2Web benchmark?","claims":[{"text":"Fengxin Li presents Iris as supporting image, text, or mixed candidates while keeping Jeva's decision module unchanged.","excerpt":"Iris admits image, text, or mixed candidates and leaves Jeva's decision module untouched.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"On a visual-candidate benchmark, the design that encodes each candidate after the request state reports scores of 92.1/87.0/90.2% and exact order invariance.","excerpt":"encodes each candidate after the state - but never after another candidate - keeps order invariance exactly, shares the state pass through a forked cache, and reaches 92.1/87.0/90.2%","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The paper reports that this design runs at a third of OneJev's latency.","excerpt":"reaches 92.1/87.0/90.2% at a third of OneJev's latency","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Reusing image candidates reduces latency substantially at the reported candidate counts.","excerpt":"Reusing image candidates across requests cuts latency 37x at K=256 and 191x at K=2048.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Escape Meridian interpretation: The reported results suggest a possible balance of accuracy, order invariance, and speed for the tested task; performance beyond that benchmark is not established by this evidence.","excerpt":"On a visual-candidate benchmark built from Multimodal-Mind2Web (every candidate is the element's screenshot crop, K=16, three splits)","support":"interpretation"}],"limitations":["The reported accuracy results come from a visual-candidate benchmark built from Multimodal-Mind2Web, with screenshot crops as candidates, K=16, and three splits; the evidence does not establish performance on other tasks.","The evidence is the arXiv abstract and does not provide the full experimental methods or results needed to assess the reported comparisons in detail."],"mediaId":"b9f37e238ed8209bfda7ec18d7ea1afd0a5f26ad94beb55994e264ccf34193c7","correctionReason":null,"id":"a27bf42efa423b344e440fee835fcc5099f49ee90dd1eb9f51f997d634a1b20b","publicationId":"d6ff4a10-34b2-4705-885d-6a003b16af49","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","sourceTitle":"Seeing the Options: Typed Decisions over Visual Candidates with Reusable Option Memory","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-24","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-28T07:32:43.710Z","createdAt":"2026-11-13T23:31:55.662Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"b9f37e238ed8209bfda7ec18d7ea1afd0a5f26ad94beb55994e264ccf34193c7","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-10-30T06:16:45.277Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","checkedAt":"2026-11-14T00:34:08.022Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"b9f37e238ed8209bfda7ec18d7ea1afd0a5f26ad94beb55994e264ccf34193c7","confidence":0.8300000000000001,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"8f09eaeb1682598f5345809eeb3e3bc9adfc14c7627843333f2c193447463e59","decidedAt":"2026-10-30T06:16:46.112Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"d9c419a09a3e28d5318524efc26829610cfe485971a1f7723b29a5c55649a671","observationId":"65355f9ae8ad90540efbd78ff74a15e815abba94e77450287cab5dbc26ce6bb9","retrievedAt":"2026-10-30T06:16:45.137Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"083d0c6e-2709-4777-8555-4381a3d670bc"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"965b7880-afb2-4e01-8e8d-51cdcdd4a762"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-13T23:31:55.662Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Li, Fengxin","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Li, Fengxin","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Li, Fengxin","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"c6f37b1ddb9f8ae71628023f797b5c89f21b0928793d9d293faa9a4491b96487:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-10-30T06:16:45.137Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"c6f37b1ddb9f8ae71628023f797b5c89f21b0928793d9d293faa9a4491b96487","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","contentSha256":"bbd12dc00ca0c7da590c0732a8f96d5a1c1754c6b628ee3795f66d819d752c56","textHash":"d9c419a09a3e28d5318524efc26829610cfe485971a1f7723b29a5c55649a671","observedAt":"2026-10-30T06:16:45.137Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":1,"returned":1,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33702","snapshotId":"c6f37b1ddb9f8ae71628023f797b5c89f21b0928793d9d293faa9a4491b96487","contentSha256":"bbd12dc00ca0c7da590c0732a8f96d5a1c1754c6b628ee3795f66d819d752c56","textHash":"d9c419a09a3e28d5318524efc26829610cfe485971a1f7723b29a5c55649a671","observedAt":"2026-10-30T06:16:45.137Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":43,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/a27bf42efa423b344e440fee835fcc5099f49ee90dd1eb9f51f997d634a1b20b/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"d6ff4a10-34b2-4705-885d-6a003b16af49","verdict":"uncertain","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The paper lists Fengxin Li as its sole author, so attributing Iris and its reported results to Li is supported. Source claims are framed as reported results, and the Escape Meridian interpretation is labeled.","excerpt":"Authors:Fengxin Li"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"uncertain","explanation":"The reading leaves central jargon and framing unexplained: request state, order invariance, forked cache, K, OneJev, latency, and what a visual candidate decision is. Repair: say agents pick which screen element to click or product to buy, and that K is the number of candidates. It also drops the paper's core trade-off: joint encoding scores 90.6/89.5/91.6% but changes its answer on 8-10% of reorders, while the third design trails it on two splits. It omits that most of the gap comes from candidates not seeing the request, and that letting candidates see each other buys nothing.","excerpt":"changes its answer on 8-10% of records when the crops are reordered. Most of the gap is the candidate not seeing the request"},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The originalPublished value of 2026-10-24 matches the v1 submission date. The 27 Oct date is a later revision, and 29 Oct is only the feed date.","excerpt":"Submitted on 24 Oct 2026 (v1), last revised 27 Oct 2026"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"The scores, exact order invariance, forked cache, one-third of OneJev latency, and the 37x and 191x reuse speedups are all source-stated. The interpretation is labeled and conditional, and it notes that performance beyond the benchmark is unknown. One minor point: the reuse speedup applies across requests.","excerpt":"keeps order invariance exactly, shares the state pass through a forked cache, and reaches 92.1/87.0/90.2% at a third of OneJev's latency"},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper, which is the most direct source.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-13T23:31:55.662Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}