{"id":"d7b8750f816de2632cab641cc1001ef4291e25e2e902fd0b86276c3ffc599c01","title":"GraspBench: Execution-Aware Cross-Robot Evaluation of 6-DoF Grasp Generation in MuJoCo","argument":"Abdul Basit, Bibek Poudel and Muhammad Shafique present GraspBench, a MuJoCo protocol for testing whether generated grasps can be executed by different robots. They argue that a grasp proposal’s score or volume alone cannot show whether a particular robot can carry it out. The protocol evaluates complete configured pipelines after robot-specific inverse-kinematics filtering, motion planning and a fixed approach-close-lift execution. Across six pipelines, four robot embodiments and five diagnostic objects, GraspGen has the highest reported overall success rate at 73.1%, followed by EconomicGrasp at 63.5%; GPG produces the largest native candidate sets but achieves 44.3% success. The authors report substantial variation by robot and object, making the central point that measured performance depends on the generator, robot embodiment, scene and execution protocol together. These results offer a way to compare configured grasping systems under shared scenarios, rather than treating proposal metrics as a stand-in for execution. The authors limit their findings to fixed scenarios and say their intervals do not estimate uncertainty from repeated executions; the results therefore do not establish intrinsic model quality or stochastic repeatability.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The authors characterize results as applying to complete configured pipelines on fixed scenarios, not intrinsic model quality or stochastic repeatability. The reported cluster-aware paired intervals do not estimate uncertainty from repeated executions. The supplied evidence is the abstract and does not provide further details about the protocol or individual robot- and object-conditioned results.","speaker":{"name":"Basit, Abdul, Poudel, Bibek, Shafique, Muhammad","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"GraspBench: Execution-Aware Cross-Robot Evaluation of 6-DoF Grasp Generation in MuJoCo","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","publishedAt":"2026-11-05","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors introduce GraspBench to evaluate complete grasp-generation pipelines after robot-specific filtering, planning and execution.","excerpt":"evaluating complete grasp-generation pipelines after robot-specific inverse-kinematics filtering, motion planning, and fixed approach-close-lift execution","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The evaluation covers six configured pipelines, four robot embodiments and five diagnostic objects, with 540 scenarios per method.","excerpt":"six configured pipelines across four robot embodiments, five diagnostic objects, and a structured tabletop pose grid, yielding 540 scenarios per method","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"GraspGen has the highest reported overall success rate, followed by EconomicGrasp; GPG has the largest candidate sets but a lower success rate.","excerpt":"GraspGen achieves the highest overall success rate (73.1%), followed by EconomicGrasp (63.5%)","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that grasp performance depends on more than the generator alone, including the robot, scene and execution protocol.","excerpt":"grasping performance depends jointly on the generator, robot embodiment, scene, and execution protocol","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T04:56:09.248Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How would repeated executions change the reported method comparisons, given that the study’s intervals do not estimate repeated-execution uncertainty?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"GraspBench: Execution-Aware Cross-Robot Evaluation of 6-DoF Grasp Generation in MuJoCo","summary":"Abdul Basit, Bibek Poudel and Muhammad Shafique present GraspBench, a MuJoCo protocol for testing whether generated grasps can be executed by different robots. They argue that a grasp proposal’s score or volume alone cannot show whether a particular robot can carry it out. The protocol evaluates complete configured pipelines after robot-specific inverse-kinematics filtering, motion planning and a fixed approach-close-lift execution. Across six pipelines, four robot embodiments and five diagnostic objects, GraspGen has the highest reported overall success rate at 73.1%, followed by EconomicGrasp at 63.5%; GPG produces the largest native candidate sets but achieves 44.3% success. The authors report substantial variation by robot and object, making the central point that measured performance depends on the generator, robot embodiment, scene and execution protocol together. These results offer a way to compare configured grasping systems under shared scenarios, rather than treating proposal metrics as a stand-in for execution. The authors limit their findings to fixed scenarios and say their intervals do not estimate uncertainty from repeated executions; the results therefore do not establish intrinsic model quality or stochastic repeatability.","question":"How would repeated executions change the reported method comparisons, given that the study’s intervals do not estimate repeated-execution uncertainty?","claims":[{"text":"The authors introduce GraspBench to evaluate complete grasp-generation pipelines after robot-specific filtering, planning and execution.","excerpt":"evaluating complete grasp-generation pipelines after robot-specific inverse-kinematics filtering, motion planning, and fixed approach-close-lift execution","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The evaluation covers six configured pipelines, four robot embodiments and five diagnostic objects, with 540 scenarios per method.","excerpt":"six configured pipelines across four robot embodiments, five diagnostic objects, and a structured tabletop pose grid, yielding 540 scenarios per method","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"GraspGen has the highest reported overall success rate, followed by EconomicGrasp; GPG has the largest candidate sets but a lower success rate.","excerpt":"GraspGen achieves the highest overall success rate (73.1%), followed by EconomicGrasp (63.5%)","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that grasp performance depends on more than the generator alone, including the robot, scene and execution protocol.","excerpt":"grasping performance depends jointly on the generator, robot embodiment, scene, and execution protocol","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The authors characterize results as applying to complete configured pipelines on fixed scenarios, not intrinsic model quality or stochastic repeatability.","The reported cluster-aware paired intervals do not estimate uncertainty from repeated executions.","The supplied evidence is the abstract and does not provide further details about the protocol or individual robot- and object-conditioned results."],"mediaId":"edae8c574a817771374502b3bf7678cc4852d985f0c4324fc480989a76595b39","correctionReason":null,"id":"d7b8750f816de2632cab641cc1001ef4291e25e2e902fd0b86276c3ffc599c01","publicationId":"09908658-d60e-4612-8f01-b4013de81cdc","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","sourceTitle":"GraspBench: Execution-Aware Cross-Robot Evaluation of 6-DoF Grasp Generation in MuJoCo","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-05","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-06T05:12:39.426Z","createdAt":"2026-11-09T04:24:49.264Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"edae8c574a817771374502b3bf7678cc4852d985f0c4324fc480989a76595b39","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T04:24:01.375Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T04:56:09.248Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"edae8c574a817771374502b3bf7678cc4852d985f0c4324fc480989a76595b39","confidence":0.67,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"afc7efa50b24f85f55c7d958774ff9d97bd88e0a5e7e142f3caff205917cb52d","decidedAt":"2026-11-09T04:24:02.495Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"3d25332561c990fd7903c8a881e0eb5d32ab8949be76793d5d70d897f1f8d243","observationId":"ef21628d144db2fbc35ef1e4c9eb86e5180ae974175c23ecb2790e280a8eaff0","retrievedAt":"2026-11-09T04:23:59.867Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"f57fc5e0-63a0-4378-8eea-6991362e39fb"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"048b4ada-ea2c-479d-81c6-8580d668c597"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-11-09T04:24:49.264Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Basit, Abdul","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Poudel, Bibek","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Shafique, Muhammad","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Basit, Abdul","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Basit, Abdul","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"7172f16d757d4b1a9c599ec4ec73add441379e533ed1485dc3682af71b2b498f:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T04:56:09.248Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"7172f16d757d4b1a9c599ec4ec73add441379e533ed1485dc3682af71b2b498f","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","contentSha256":"c467a70861e303c463f843f084ae3e52673c71005de2730498b63549feb4b5ae","textHash":"3d25332561c990fd7903c8a881e0eb5d32ab8949be76793d5d70d897f1f8d243","observedAt":"2026-11-09T04:56:09.248Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Poudel, Bibek","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Poudel, Bibek","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"7172f16d757d4b1a9c599ec4ec73add441379e533ed1485dc3682af71b2b498f:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T04:56:09.248Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"7172f16d757d4b1a9c599ec4ec73add441379e533ed1485dc3682af71b2b498f","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","contentSha256":"c467a70861e303c463f843f084ae3e52673c71005de2730498b63549feb4b5ae","textHash":"3d25332561c990fd7903c8a881e0eb5d32ab8949be76793d5d70d897f1f8d243","observedAt":"2026-11-09T04:56:09.248Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Shafique, Muhammad","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Shafique, Muhammad","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"7172f16d757d4b1a9c599ec4ec73add441379e533ed1485dc3682af71b2b498f:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T04:56:09.248Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"7172f16d757d4b1a9c599ec4ec73add441379e533ed1485dc3682af71b2b498f","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","contentSha256":"c467a70861e303c463f843f084ae3e52673c71005de2730498b63549feb4b5ae","textHash":"3d25332561c990fd7903c8a881e0eb5d32ab8949be76793d5d70d897f1f8d243","observedAt":"2026-11-09T04:56:09.248Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":3,"returned":3,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","snapshotId":"7172f16d757d4b1a9c599ec4ec73add441379e533ed1485dc3682af71b2b498f","contentSha256":"c467a70861e303c463f843f084ae3e52673c71005de2730498b63549feb4b5ae","textHash":"3d25332561c990fd7903c8a881e0eb5d32ab8949be76793d5d70d897f1f8d243","observedAt":"2026-11-09T04:56:09.248Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":42,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/d7b8750f816de2632cab641cc1001ef4291e25e2e902fd0b86276c3ffc599c01/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/graspbench-execution-aware-cross-robot-evaluation-of-6-dof-d7b8750f","formats":{"html":"/readings/graspbench-execution-aware-cross-robot-evaluation-of-6-dof-d7b8750f","markdown":"/readings/graspbench-execution-aware-cross-robot-evaluation-of-6-dof-d7b8750f.md","json":"/readings/graspbench-execution-aware-cross-robot-evaluation-of-6-dof-d7b8750f.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"d7b8750f816de2632cab641cc1001ef4291e25e2e902fd0b86276c3ffc599c01","revision":"09908658-d60e-4612-8f01-b4013de81cdc","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"GraspBench: Execution-Aware Cross-Robot Evaluation of 6-DoF Grasp Generation in MuJoCo","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/graspbench-execution-aware-cross-robot-evaluation-of-6-dof-d7b8750f"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","revision":"3d25332561c990fd7903c8a881e0eb5d32ab8949be76793d5d70d897f1f8d243","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"GraspBench: Execution-Aware Cross-Robot Evaluation of 6-DoF Grasp Generation in MuJoCo","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"d7b8750f816de2632cab641cc1001ef4291e25e2e902fd0b86276c3ffc599c01","title":"GraspBench: Execution-Aware Cross-Robot Evaluation of 6-DoF Grasp Generation in MuJoCo","argument":"Abdul Basit, Bibek Poudel and Muhammad Shafique present GraspBench, a MuJoCo protocol for testing whether generated grasps can be executed by different robots. They argue that a grasp proposal’s score or volume alone cannot show whether a particular robot can carry it out. The protocol evaluates complete configured pipelines after robot-specific inverse-kinematics filtering, motion planning and a fixed approach-close-lift execution. Across six pipelines, four robot embodiments and five diagnostic objects, GraspGen has the highest reported overall success rate at 73.1%, followed by EconomicGrasp at 63.5%; GPG produces the largest native candidate sets but achieves 44.3% success. The authors report substantial variation by robot and object, making the central point that measured performance depends on the generator, robot embodiment, scene and execution protocol together. These results offer a way to compare configured grasping systems under shared scenarios, rather than treating proposal metrics as a stand-in for execution. The authors limit their findings to fixed scenarios and say their intervals do not estimate uncertainty from repeated executions; the results therefore do not establish intrinsic model quality or stochastic repeatability.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The authors characterize results as applying to complete configured pipelines on fixed scenarios, not intrinsic model quality or stochastic repeatability. The reported cluster-aware paired intervals do not estimate uncertainty from repeated executions. The supplied evidence is the abstract and does not provide further details about the protocol or individual robot- and object-conditioned results.","speaker":{"name":"Basit, Abdul, Poudel, Bibek, Shafique, Muhammad","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"GraspBench: Execution-Aware Cross-Robot Evaluation of 6-DoF Grasp Generation in MuJoCo","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","publishedAt":"2026-11-05","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors introduce GraspBench to evaluate complete grasp-generation pipelines after robot-specific filtering, planning and execution.","excerpt":"evaluating complete grasp-generation pipelines after robot-specific inverse-kinematics filtering, motion planning, and fixed approach-close-lift execution","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The evaluation covers six configured pipelines, four robot embodiments and five diagnostic objects, with 540 scenarios per method.","excerpt":"six configured pipelines across four robot embodiments, five diagnostic objects, and a structured tabletop pose grid, yielding 540 scenarios per method","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"GraspGen has the highest reported overall success rate, followed by EconomicGrasp; GPG has the largest candidate sets but a lower success rate.","excerpt":"GraspGen achieves the highest overall success rate (73.1%), followed by EconomicGrasp (63.5%)","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that grasp performance depends on more than the generator alone, including the robot, scene and execution protocol.","excerpt":"grasping performance depends jointly on the generator, robot embodiment, scene, and execution protocol","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T04:56:09.248Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How would repeated executions change the reported method comparisons, given that the study’s intervals do not estimate repeated-execution uncertainty?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"GraspBench: Execution-Aware Cross-Robot Evaluation of 6-DoF Grasp Generation in MuJoCo","summary":"Abdul Basit, Bibek Poudel and Muhammad Shafique present GraspBench, a MuJoCo protocol for testing whether generated grasps can be executed by different robots. They argue that a grasp proposal’s score or volume alone cannot show whether a particular robot can carry it out. The protocol evaluates complete configured pipelines after robot-specific inverse-kinematics filtering, motion planning and a fixed approach-close-lift execution. Across six pipelines, four robot embodiments and five diagnostic objects, GraspGen has the highest reported overall success rate at 73.1%, followed by EconomicGrasp at 63.5%; GPG produces the largest native candidate sets but achieves 44.3% success. The authors report substantial variation by robot and object, making the central point that measured performance depends on the generator, robot embodiment, scene and execution protocol together. These results offer a way to compare configured grasping systems under shared scenarios, rather than treating proposal metrics as a stand-in for execution. The authors limit their findings to fixed scenarios and say their intervals do not estimate uncertainty from repeated executions; the results therefore do not establish intrinsic model quality or stochastic repeatability.","question":"How would repeated executions change the reported method comparisons, given that the study’s intervals do not estimate repeated-execution uncertainty?","claims":[{"text":"The authors introduce GraspBench to evaluate complete grasp-generation pipelines after robot-specific filtering, planning and execution.","excerpt":"evaluating complete grasp-generation pipelines after robot-specific inverse-kinematics filtering, motion planning, and fixed approach-close-lift execution","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The evaluation covers six configured pipelines, four robot embodiments and five diagnostic objects, with 540 scenarios per method.","excerpt":"six configured pipelines across four robot embodiments, five diagnostic objects, and a structured tabletop pose grid, yielding 540 scenarios per method","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"GraspGen has the highest reported overall success rate, followed by EconomicGrasp; GPG has the largest candidate sets but a lower success rate.","excerpt":"GraspGen achieves the highest overall success rate (73.1%), followed by EconomicGrasp (63.5%)","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that grasp performance depends on more than the generator alone, including the robot, scene and execution protocol.","excerpt":"grasping performance depends jointly on the generator, robot embodiment, scene, and execution protocol","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The authors characterize results as applying to complete configured pipelines on fixed scenarios, not intrinsic model quality or stochastic repeatability.","The reported cluster-aware paired intervals do not estimate uncertainty from repeated executions.","The supplied evidence is the abstract and does not provide further details about the protocol or individual robot- and object-conditioned results."],"mediaId":"edae8c574a817771374502b3bf7678cc4852d985f0c4324fc480989a76595b39","correctionReason":null,"id":"d7b8750f816de2632cab641cc1001ef4291e25e2e902fd0b86276c3ffc599c01","publicationId":"09908658-d60e-4612-8f01-b4013de81cdc","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","sourceTitle":"GraspBench: Execution-Aware Cross-Robot Evaluation of 6-DoF Grasp Generation in MuJoCo","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-05","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-06T05:12:39.426Z","createdAt":"2026-11-09T04:24:49.264Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"edae8c574a817771374502b3bf7678cc4852d985f0c4324fc480989a76595b39","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T04:24:01.375Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","checkedAt":"2026-11-09T04:56:09.248Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"edae8c574a817771374502b3bf7678cc4852d985f0c4324fc480989a76595b39","confidence":0.67,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"afc7efa50b24f85f55c7d958774ff9d97bd88e0a5e7e142f3caff205917cb52d","decidedAt":"2026-11-09T04:24:02.495Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"3d25332561c990fd7903c8a881e0eb5d32ab8949be76793d5d70d897f1f8d243","observationId":"ef21628d144db2fbc35ef1e4c9eb86e5180ae974175c23ecb2790e280a8eaff0","retrievedAt":"2026-11-09T04:23:59.867Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"f57fc5e0-63a0-4378-8eea-6991362e39fb"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"048b4ada-ea2c-479d-81c6-8580d668c597"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-11-09T04:24:49.264Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Basit, Abdul","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Poudel, Bibek","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Shafique, Muhammad","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Basit, Abdul","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Basit, Abdul","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"7172f16d757d4b1a9c599ec4ec73add441379e533ed1485dc3682af71b2b498f:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T04:56:09.248Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"7172f16d757d4b1a9c599ec4ec73add441379e533ed1485dc3682af71b2b498f","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","contentSha256":"c467a70861e303c463f843f084ae3e52673c71005de2730498b63549feb4b5ae","textHash":"3d25332561c990fd7903c8a881e0eb5d32ab8949be76793d5d70d897f1f8d243","observedAt":"2026-11-09T04:56:09.248Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Poudel, Bibek","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Poudel, Bibek","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"7172f16d757d4b1a9c599ec4ec73add441379e533ed1485dc3682af71b2b498f:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T04:56:09.248Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"7172f16d757d4b1a9c599ec4ec73add441379e533ed1485dc3682af71b2b498f","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","contentSha256":"c467a70861e303c463f843f084ae3e52673c71005de2730498b63549feb4b5ae","textHash":"3d25332561c990fd7903c8a881e0eb5d32ab8949be76793d5d70d897f1f8d243","observedAt":"2026-11-09T04:56:09.248Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Shafique, Muhammad","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Shafique, Muhammad","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"7172f16d757d4b1a9c599ec4ec73add441379e533ed1485dc3682af71b2b498f:participation:2","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-09T04:56:09.248Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"7172f16d757d4b1a9c599ec4ec73add441379e533ed1485dc3682af71b2b498f","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","contentSha256":"c467a70861e303c463f843f084ae3e52673c71005de2730498b63549feb4b5ae","textHash":"3d25332561c990fd7903c8a881e0eb5d32ab8949be76793d5d70d897f1f8d243","observedAt":"2026-11-09T04:56:09.248Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":3,"returned":3,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07651","snapshotId":"7172f16d757d4b1a9c599ec4ec73add441379e533ed1485dc3682af71b2b498f","contentSha256":"c467a70861e303c463f843f084ae3e52673c71005de2730498b63549feb4b5ae","textHash":"3d25332561c990fd7903c8a881e0eb5d32ab8949be76793d5d70d897f1f8d243","observedAt":"2026-11-09T04:56:09.248Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":42,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/d7b8750f816de2632cab641cc1001ef4291e25e2e902fd0b86276c3ffc599c01/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"09908658-d60e-4612-8f01-b4013de81cdc","verdict":"passed","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The reading correctly credits Abdul Basit, Bibek Poudel and Muhammad Shafique and frames the benchmark results and conclusions as the authors' reported findings and argument.","excerpt":"Authors:Abdul Basit, Bibek Poudel, Muhammad Shafique"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"pass","explanation":"The reading leads with the actor and the argument that proposal scores or volume alone do not show robot executability. It gives the numbers and preserves the authors' scope limits. Central terms are kept exactly; tooltip coverage is suggested for MuJoCo, 6-DoF, inverse-kinematics and embodiment. For example, a MuJoCo tooltip could identify it as a physics simulator, so readers do not assume the tests used physical robots. These are tooltip suggestions, not fidelity failures. The question follows from the stated limitation on repeated executions.","excerpt":"proposal quality alone does not determine whether a grasp is executable by a particular robot"},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The originalPublished date of 2026-11-05 matches the arXiv v1 submission date. The later feed timestamp is not used.","excerpt":"[Submitted on 5 Nov 2026]"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"The claims, figures (73.1%, 63.5%, 44.3%), pipeline and scenario counts, and limitations all match the abstract. The statement that the results offer a comparison under shared scenarios reflects the protocol's described purpose and does not overstate real-world reliability. The reading adds no invented benefits or costs.","excerpt":"The results characterize complete configured pipelines on fixed scenarios rather than intrinsic model quality or stochastic repeatability"},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper, which is the most direct access to the source.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-09T04:24:49.264Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}