{"id":"9bd7b9073331f2ea8def71dda22ddc36e55f688b38107ddc352bb12ba150d391","title":"Guillermo Gallacher and Yusuke Aoki argue in Indeed Hiring Lab that responsible AI job mentions are rising","argument":"Originally published June 17, 2025, Guillermo Gallacher and Yusuke Aoki report in Indeed Hiring Lab that job postings mentioning Responsible AI have grown as a share of AI-related postings, while remaining a small share. Their analysis counts keyword mentions in postings; it does not measure whether companies’ practices reduce harm. In the United States, legal, banking & finance, research & development, and education & instruction postings had relatively high shares of Responsible AI mentions. Gallacher and Aoki argue that these human-centered roles may need attention to fairness, transparency, accountability, and legal or ethical guidelines, while Responsible AI mentions are more limited in retail and food service, where AI adoption is also limited. They find no correlation between national regulation strength and Responsible AI mentions, and suggest reputation or international business strategies may also shape companies’ postings. The authors frame AI risks as costs companies can impose on society and conclude that the optimal level of Responsible AI is unknown; if it is above the current level, companies may be under-investing in risk mitigation. Their analysis covers countries where Indeed operates, not China, and its findings concern job-posting language rather than demonstrated company action.","topicIds":["work-and-business--jobs-and-occupations","job-displacement-and-creation"],"domain":"other","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The analysis counts keywords in job postings; it does not establish whether employers adopted Responsible AI practices or whether those practices reduced harm. The authors say the analysis covers countries where Indeed operates and excludes China. Text as retrieved on October 30, 2026; originally published June 17, 2025.","speaker":{"name":"Indeed Hiring Lab","roleAtSource":"Publisher"},"source":{"title":"The Rise of Responsible AI Jobs","publisher":"Indeed Hiring Lab","format":"Article","url":"https://hiringlab.indeed.com/2025/06/17/the-rise-of-responsible-ai-jobs/","publishedAt":"2025-06-17","dateBasis":"Date from the publisher’s archive: its article address or archive listing."},"evidence":[{"text":"Gallacher and Aoki report that Responsible AI mentions rose from close to zero in 2019 to 0.9% of AI-related postings in 2025, averaging across their 22-country sample.","excerpt":"Responsible AI mentions in job descriptions have risen as a share of all AI-related postings, from close to zero in 2019 to 0.9% globally in 2025 (on average among the 22 countries in our sample)","url":"https://hiringlab.indeed.com/2025/06/17/the-rise-of-responsible-ai-jobs/","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"In the United States, legal, banking & finance, research & development, and education & instruction postings had the highest shares of Responsible AI mentions in the period they examined.","excerpt":"the occupations with the highest shares of Responsible AI mentions between April 2024 and March 2025 included legal (3.5%), banking & finance (2.3%), research & development (2.3%), and education & instruction (1.7%).","url":"https://hiringlab.indeed.com/2025/06/17/the-rise-of-responsible-ai-jobs/","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report no correlation between national regulatory strength and Responsible AI mentions in job postings.","excerpt":"Interestingly, regulation alone was not found to be correlated with Responsible AI mentions.","url":"https://hiringlab.indeed.com/2025/06/17/the-rise-of-responsible-ai-jobs/","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Gallacher and Aoki say the optimal level of Responsible AI is unknown, and conditionally suggest companies would be under-investing in risk mitigation if that level exceeds the current 1%.","excerpt":"We don’t currently know what the optimal level of Responsible AI is, but it’s clear that awareness of its importance is rising. If the optimal level is above the current 1%, then companies are still under-investing in risk mitigation.","url":"https://hiringlab.indeed.com/2025/06/17/the-rise-of-responsible-ai-jobs/","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors’ analysis covers only countries where Indeed operates and excludes China.","excerpt":"Our analysis only covers countries where Indeed has operations, and thus does not include China, an acknowledged global AI powerhouse.","url":"https://hiringlab.indeed.com/2025/06/17/the-rise-of-responsible-ai-jobs/","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://hiringlab.indeed.com/2025/06/17/the-rise-of-responsible-ai-jobs/","checkedAt":null,"items":[]},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"What level of Responsible AI effort would reduce AI risks, and how could it be measured beyond mentions in job postings?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Guillermo Gallacher and Yusuke Aoki argue in Indeed Hiring Lab that responsible AI job mentions are rising","summary":"Originally published June 17, 2025, Guillermo Gallacher and Yusuke Aoki report in Indeed Hiring Lab that job postings mentioning Responsible AI have grown as a share of AI-related postings, while remaining a small share. Their analysis counts keyword mentions in postings; it does not measure whether companies’ practices reduce harm. In the United States, legal, banking & finance, research & development, and education & instruction postings had relatively high shares of Responsible AI mentions. Gallacher and Aoki argue that these human-centered roles may need attention to fairness, transparency, accountability, and legal or ethical guidelines, while Responsible AI mentions are more limited in retail and food service, where AI adoption is also limited. They find no correlation between national regulation strength and Responsible AI mentions, and suggest reputation or international business strategies may also shape companies’ postings. The authors frame AI risks as costs companies can impose on society and conclude that the optimal level of Responsible AI is unknown; if it is above the current level, companies may be under-investing in risk mitigation. Their analysis covers countries where Indeed operates, not China, and its findings concern job-posting language rather than demonstrated company action.","question":"What level of Responsible AI effort would reduce AI risks, and how could it be measured beyond mentions in job postings?","claims":[{"text":"Gallacher and Aoki report that Responsible AI mentions rose from close to zero in 2019 to 0.9% of AI-related postings in 2025, averaging across their 22-country sample.","excerpt":"Responsible AI mentions in job descriptions have risen as a share of all AI-related postings, from close to zero in 2019 to 0.9% globally in 2025 (on average among the 22 countries in our sample)","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"In the United States, legal, banking & finance, research & development, and education & instruction postings had the highest shares of Responsible AI mentions in the period they examined.","excerpt":"the occupations with the highest shares of Responsible AI mentions between April 2024 and March 2025 included legal (3.5%), banking & finance (2.3%), research & development (2.3%), and education & instruction (1.7%).","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report no correlation between national regulatory strength and Responsible AI mentions in job postings.","excerpt":"Interestingly, regulation alone was not found to be correlated with Responsible AI mentions.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Gallacher and Aoki say the optimal level of Responsible AI is unknown, and conditionally suggest companies would be under-investing in risk mitigation if that level exceeds the current 1%.","excerpt":"We don’t currently know what the optimal level of Responsible AI is, but it’s clear that awareness of its importance is rising. If the optimal level is above the current 1%, then companies are still under-investing in risk mitigation.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors’ analysis covers only countries where Indeed operates and excludes China.","excerpt":"Our analysis only covers countries where Indeed has operations, and thus does not include China, an acknowledged global AI powerhouse.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The analysis counts keywords in job postings; it does not establish whether employers adopted Responsible AI practices or whether those practices reduced harm.","The authors say the analysis covers countries where Indeed operates and excludes China.","Text as retrieved on October 30, 2026; originally published June 17, 2025."],"mediaId":null,"correctionReason":null,"id":"9bd7b9073331f2ea8def71dda22ddc36e55f688b38107ddc352bb12ba150d391","publicationId":"d53c14f2-70ba-c966-5a83-456ea889b07e","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://hiringlab.indeed.com/2025/06/17/the-rise-of-responsible-ai-jobs/","sourceTitle":"The Rise of Responsible AI Jobs","publisher":"Indeed Hiring Lab","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2025-06-17","precision":"day","basis":"backfill:publisher_archive_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-30T22:53:52.457Z","createdAt":"2026-11-13T13:28:23.136Z","historical":true,"entityIds":[],"topicIds":["work-and-business--jobs-and-occupations","job-displacement-and-creation"],"media":[],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://hiringlab.indeed.com/2025/06/17/the-rise-of-responsible-ai-jobs/","checkedAt":null,"items":[]},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","mediaId":null,"inputHash":"efe26f3775e9bcb7699ccda787ec0ec68f3863a8a32562945e43201d24228b33","rubricVersion":"em-backfill-context/3","provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","reasonCodes":["bridge_admitted_by_model"],"confidence":0.95,"decidedAt":"2026-10-30T22:53:48.964Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"77c686276ca2302abd2a737f9067af77a0ef2a30b46d5e6b5d2f6b6aa261fb0d","observationId":"a5b417b59e115bc110b279d96c774be39351823d0d10f1471a004febe2d5be58","retrievedAt":"2026-10-30T22:55:46.010Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"openai/gpt-6-luna","runId":"0e3a5fb6-97e7-2812-401e-54f82f07ea28"},"reviewer":{"model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5","runId":"b62087d7-c956-0183-4c10-26f67a6ec55e"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-11-13T13:24:32.492Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/guillermo-gallacher-and-yusuke-aoki-argue-in-indeed-hiring-lab-9bd7b907","formats":{"html":"/readings/guillermo-gallacher-and-yusuke-aoki-argue-in-indeed-hiring-lab-9bd7b907","markdown":"/readings/guillermo-gallacher-and-yusuke-aoki-argue-in-indeed-hiring-lab-9bd7b907.md","json":"/readings/guillermo-gallacher-and-yusuke-aoki-argue-in-indeed-hiring-lab-9bd7b907.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[],"entities":[{"id":"indeed-hiring-lab","name":"Indeed Hiring Lab","kind":"organization","context":"Indeed Hiring Lab is the economic research arm of the job site Indeed, publishing analyses of job postings, wages and hiring trends.","referenceUrls":["https://www.hiringlab.org/","https://www.hiringlab.org/feed/"],"path":"/entities/indeed-hiring-lab","json":"/entities/indeed-hiring-lab.json","markdown":"/entities/indeed-hiring-lab.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"9bd7b9073331f2ea8def71dda22ddc36e55f688b38107ddc352bb12ba150d391","revision":"d53c14f2-70ba-c966-5a83-456ea889b07e","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"Guillermo Gallacher and Yusuke Aoki argue in Indeed Hiring Lab that responsible AI job mentions are rising","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/guillermo-gallacher-and-yusuke-aoki-argue-in-indeed-hiring-lab-9bd7b907"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://hiringlab.indeed.com/2025/06/17/the-rise-of-responsible-ai-jobs/","revision":"77c686276ca2302abd2a737f9067af77a0ef2a30b46d5e6b5d2f6b6aa261fb0d","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"The Rise of Responsible AI Jobs","url":"https://hiringlab.indeed.com/2025/06/17/the-rise-of-responsible-ai-jobs/"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"9bd7b9073331f2ea8def71dda22ddc36e55f688b38107ddc352bb12ba150d391","title":"Guillermo Gallacher and Yusuke Aoki argue in Indeed Hiring Lab that responsible AI job mentions are rising","argument":"Originally published June 17, 2025, Guillermo Gallacher and Yusuke Aoki report in Indeed Hiring Lab that job postings mentioning Responsible AI have grown as a share of AI-related postings, while remaining a small share. Their analysis counts keyword mentions in postings; it does not measure whether companies’ practices reduce harm. In the United States, legal, banking & finance, research & development, and education & instruction postings had relatively high shares of Responsible AI mentions. Gallacher and Aoki argue that these human-centered roles may need attention to fairness, transparency, accountability, and legal or ethical guidelines, while Responsible AI mentions are more limited in retail and food service, where AI adoption is also limited. They find no correlation between national regulation strength and Responsible AI mentions, and suggest reputation or international business strategies may also shape companies’ postings. The authors frame AI risks as costs companies can impose on society and conclude that the optimal level of Responsible AI is unknown; if it is above the current level, companies may be under-investing in risk mitigation. Their analysis covers countries where Indeed operates, not China, and its findings concern job-posting language rather than demonstrated company action.","topicIds":["work-and-business--jobs-and-occupations","job-displacement-and-creation"],"domain":"other","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The analysis counts keywords in job postings; it does not establish whether employers adopted Responsible AI practices or whether those practices reduced harm. The authors say the analysis covers countries where Indeed operates and excludes China. Text as retrieved on October 30, 2026; originally published June 17, 2025.","speaker":{"name":"Indeed Hiring Lab","roleAtSource":"Publisher"},"source":{"title":"The Rise of Responsible AI Jobs","publisher":"Indeed Hiring Lab","format":"Article","url":"https://hiringlab.indeed.com/2025/06/17/the-rise-of-responsible-ai-jobs/","publishedAt":"2025-06-17","dateBasis":"Date from the publisher’s archive: its article address or archive listing."},"evidence":[{"text":"Gallacher and Aoki report that Responsible AI mentions rose from close to zero in 2019 to 0.9% of AI-related postings in 2025, averaging across their 22-country sample.","excerpt":"Responsible AI mentions in job descriptions have risen as a share of all AI-related postings, from close to zero in 2019 to 0.9% globally in 2025 (on average among the 22 countries in our sample)","url":"https://hiringlab.indeed.com/2025/06/17/the-rise-of-responsible-ai-jobs/","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"In the United States, legal, banking & finance, research & development, and education & instruction postings had the highest shares of Responsible AI mentions in the period they examined.","excerpt":"the occupations with the highest shares of Responsible AI mentions between April 2024 and March 2025 included legal (3.5%), banking & finance (2.3%), research & development (2.3%), and education & instruction (1.7%).","url":"https://hiringlab.indeed.com/2025/06/17/the-rise-of-responsible-ai-jobs/","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report no correlation between national regulatory strength and Responsible AI mentions in job postings.","excerpt":"Interestingly, regulation alone was not found to be correlated with Responsible AI mentions.","url":"https://hiringlab.indeed.com/2025/06/17/the-rise-of-responsible-ai-jobs/","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Gallacher and Aoki say the optimal level of Responsible AI is unknown, and conditionally suggest companies would be under-investing in risk mitigation if that level exceeds the current 1%.","excerpt":"We don’t currently know what the optimal level of Responsible AI is, but it’s clear that awareness of its importance is rising. If the optimal level is above the current 1%, then companies are still under-investing in risk mitigation.","url":"https://hiringlab.indeed.com/2025/06/17/the-rise-of-responsible-ai-jobs/","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors’ analysis covers only countries where Indeed operates and excludes China.","excerpt":"Our analysis only covers countries where Indeed has operations, and thus does not include China, an acknowledged global AI powerhouse.","url":"https://hiringlab.indeed.com/2025/06/17/the-rise-of-responsible-ai-jobs/","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://hiringlab.indeed.com/2025/06/17/the-rise-of-responsible-ai-jobs/","checkedAt":null,"items":[]},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"What level of Responsible AI effort would reduce AI risks, and how could it be measured beyond mentions in job postings?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Guillermo Gallacher and Yusuke Aoki argue in Indeed Hiring Lab that responsible AI job mentions are rising","summary":"Originally published June 17, 2025, Guillermo Gallacher and Yusuke Aoki report in Indeed Hiring Lab that job postings mentioning Responsible AI have grown as a share of AI-related postings, while remaining a small share. Their analysis counts keyword mentions in postings; it does not measure whether companies’ practices reduce harm. In the United States, legal, banking & finance, research & development, and education & instruction postings had relatively high shares of Responsible AI mentions. Gallacher and Aoki argue that these human-centered roles may need attention to fairness, transparency, accountability, and legal or ethical guidelines, while Responsible AI mentions are more limited in retail and food service, where AI adoption is also limited. They find no correlation between national regulation strength and Responsible AI mentions, and suggest reputation or international business strategies may also shape companies’ postings. The authors frame AI risks as costs companies can impose on society and conclude that the optimal level of Responsible AI is unknown; if it is above the current level, companies may be under-investing in risk mitigation. Their analysis covers countries where Indeed operates, not China, and its findings concern job-posting language rather than demonstrated company action.","question":"What level of Responsible AI effort would reduce AI risks, and how could it be measured beyond mentions in job postings?","claims":[{"text":"Gallacher and Aoki report that Responsible AI mentions rose from close to zero in 2019 to 0.9% of AI-related postings in 2025, averaging across their 22-country sample.","excerpt":"Responsible AI mentions in job descriptions have risen as a share of all AI-related postings, from close to zero in 2019 to 0.9% globally in 2025 (on average among the 22 countries in our sample)","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"In the United States, legal, banking & finance, research & development, and education & instruction postings had the highest shares of Responsible AI mentions in the period they examined.","excerpt":"the occupations with the highest shares of Responsible AI mentions between April 2024 and March 2025 included legal (3.5%), banking & finance (2.3%), research & development (2.3%), and education & instruction (1.7%).","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report no correlation between national regulatory strength and Responsible AI mentions in job postings.","excerpt":"Interestingly, regulation alone was not found to be correlated with Responsible AI mentions.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Gallacher and Aoki say the optimal level of Responsible AI is unknown, and conditionally suggest companies would be under-investing in risk mitigation if that level exceeds the current 1%.","excerpt":"We don’t currently know what the optimal level of Responsible AI is, but it’s clear that awareness of its importance is rising. If the optimal level is above the current 1%, then companies are still under-investing in risk mitigation.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors’ analysis covers only countries where Indeed operates and excludes China.","excerpt":"Our analysis only covers countries where Indeed has operations, and thus does not include China, an acknowledged global AI powerhouse.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The analysis counts keywords in job postings; it does not establish whether employers adopted Responsible AI practices or whether those practices reduced harm.","The authors say the analysis covers countries where Indeed operates and excludes China.","Text as retrieved on October 30, 2026; originally published June 17, 2025."],"mediaId":null,"correctionReason":null,"id":"9bd7b9073331f2ea8def71dda22ddc36e55f688b38107ddc352bb12ba150d391","publicationId":"d53c14f2-70ba-c966-5a83-456ea889b07e","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://hiringlab.indeed.com/2025/06/17/the-rise-of-responsible-ai-jobs/","sourceTitle":"The Rise of Responsible AI Jobs","publisher":"Indeed Hiring Lab","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2025-06-17","precision":"day","basis":"backfill:publisher_archive_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-30T22:53:52.457Z","createdAt":"2026-11-13T13:28:23.136Z","historical":true,"entityIds":[],"topicIds":["work-and-business--jobs-and-occupations","job-displacement-and-creation"],"media":[],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://hiringlab.indeed.com/2025/06/17/the-rise-of-responsible-ai-jobs/","checkedAt":null,"items":[]},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","mediaId":null,"inputHash":"efe26f3775e9bcb7699ccda787ec0ec68f3863a8a32562945e43201d24228b33","rubricVersion":"em-backfill-context/3","provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","reasonCodes":["bridge_admitted_by_model"],"confidence":0.95,"decidedAt":"2026-10-30T22:53:48.964Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"77c686276ca2302abd2a737f9067af77a0ef2a30b46d5e6b5d2f6b6aa261fb0d","observationId":"a5b417b59e115bc110b279d96c774be39351823d0d10f1471a004febe2d5be58","retrievedAt":"2026-10-30T22:55:46.010Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"openai/gpt-6-luna","runId":"0e3a5fb6-97e7-2812-401e-54f82f07ea28"},"reviewer":{"model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5","runId":"b62087d7-c956-0183-4c10-26f67a6ec55e"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-11-13T13:24:32.492Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"d53c14f2-70ba-c966-5a83-456ea889b07e","verdict":"passed","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The reading correctly credits Guillermo Gallacher and Yusuke Aoki and the publisher, Indeed Hiring Lab. Their findings and arguments stay attributed to them throughout. This is one analytical article, not a listing.","excerpt":"By Guillermo Gallacher & Yusuke Aoki"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"pass","explanation":"The summary leads with the actors and the finding. It explains that the analysis counts keyword mentions in job postings, gives the occupational and regulation findings, and keeps the authors' conditional under-investment argument. The regulation finding is softened slightly: the source says regulation alone was not correlated, and the reading says simply no correlation. That matches the source's methodology note. Responsible AI is understandable in context through fairness, transparency and accountability. The question follows from the authors' own stated unknown.","excerpt":"We don’t currently know what the optimal level of Responsible AI is, but it’s clear that awareness of its importance is rising."},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The reading gives June 17, 2025, which matches the dateline at day precision. The page was modified on 2025-09-09, but the cited passages are the coherent body of the article, with data running to March 2025. The later related-story carousel is not used. There is no hindsight framing, and the retrieval date is disclosed in the limitations.","excerpt":"June 17, 2025"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"All claims match their source excerpts: the 0.9% figure, the U.S. occupations, the lack of a regulation correlation, the conditional under-investment point and the exclusion of China. The limitation that keyword counts do not show adopted practices is a fair reading of the method, not a new claim. The page edit does not plainly affect these core passages.","excerpt":"If the optimal level is above the current 1%, then companies are still under-investing in risk mitigation."},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"No media is selected, and no verified media candidates were supplied, so nothing is misidentified.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-13T13:24:32.492Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}