{"id":"4f4edd506f84778e837038ee7c16603a75dd5759dd509991ce38e55dd1b28405","title":"Harry Yizhou Tian and Ming Yin on Multi-Agent Deliberation","argument":"Authors Harry Yizhou Tian and Ming Yin report two user studies of multi-agent deliberation (MAD), where multiple LLMs engage in structured discussion. They tested LLM-response-verification and fact-checking, comparing MAD with other AI decision-support methods. MAD outperformed single-round AI assistance on both tasks; the authors say multi-round interaction was the main driver, while a second AI added value when the single AI had room to improve. The design choices also mattered: a devil’s advocate persona lowered accuracy and user experience, while active human participation improved accuracy in one task at the cost of frustration. The results make MAD more than a question of adding more AI voices: how the discussion is structured and how people take part may affect both decision accuracy and the experience of using the system. The abstract reports results for these two tasks; it does not establish whether the same effects hold in other settings.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The supplied evidence is the paper’s abstract and does not provide study methods, participant details, or results beyond the reported comparisons. The reported findings concern LLM-response-verification and fact-checking; the abstract does not establish whether they generalize to other decision tasks.","speaker":{"name":"Tian, Harry Yizhou, Yin, Ming","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Understanding the Effects of Multi-Agent Deliberation for Human-AI Decision-Making","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","publishedAt":"2026-11-11","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors studied multi-agent deliberation in two human-AI decision tasks: LLM-response-verification and fact-checking.","excerpt":"We conduct two user studies on LLM-response-verification and fact-checking.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that MAD outperformed single-round AI assistance on both tasks, with multi-round interaction the main driver of the benefit.","excerpt":"We find MAD outperformed single-round AI assistance on both tasks; multi-round interaction was the main driver of this benefit","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that a devil’s advocate persona lowered accuracy and user experience, while active human participation improved accuracy in one task at the cost of frustration.","excerpt":"finding a devil's advocate persona to lower accuracy and user experience, while humans' active participation in MAD improved accuracy in one task at the cost of frustration.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","checkedAt":"2026-11-13T11:32:11.871Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"Do multi-agent deliberation’s effects on decision accuracy and user experience hold beyond LLM-response-verification and fact-checking?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Harry Yizhou Tian and Ming Yin on Multi-Agent Deliberation","summary":"Authors Harry Yizhou Tian and Ming Yin report two user studies of multi-agent deliberation (MAD), where multiple LLMs engage in structured discussion. They tested LLM-response-verification and fact-checking, comparing MAD with other AI decision-support methods. MAD outperformed single-round AI assistance on both tasks; the authors say multi-round interaction was the main driver, while a second AI added value when the single AI had room to improve. The design choices also mattered: a devil’s advocate persona lowered accuracy and user experience, while active human participation improved accuracy in one task at the cost of frustration. The results make MAD more than a question of adding more AI voices: how the discussion is structured and how people take part may affect both decision accuracy and the experience of using the system. The abstract reports results for these two tasks; it does not establish whether the same effects hold in other settings.","question":"Do multi-agent deliberation’s effects on decision accuracy and user experience hold beyond LLM-response-verification and fact-checking?","claims":[{"text":"The authors studied multi-agent deliberation in two human-AI decision tasks: LLM-response-verification and fact-checking.","excerpt":"We conduct two user studies on LLM-response-verification and fact-checking.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that MAD outperformed single-round AI assistance on both tasks, with multi-round interaction the main driver of the benefit.","excerpt":"We find MAD outperformed single-round AI assistance on both tasks; multi-round interaction was the main driver of this benefit","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that a devil’s advocate persona lowered accuracy and user experience, while active human participation improved accuracy in one task at the cost of frustration.","excerpt":"finding a devil's advocate persona to lower accuracy and user experience, while humans' active participation in MAD improved accuracy in one task at the cost of frustration.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The supplied evidence is the paper’s abstract and does not provide study methods, participant details, or results beyond the reported comparisons.","The reported findings concern LLM-response-verification and fact-checking; the abstract does not establish whether they generalize to other decision tasks."],"mediaId":"b81add7b79d9380ec00193a5f7248e26ae57fae1ab43f07e3ba31f169c00c2e4","correctionReason":null,"id":"4f4edd506f84778e837038ee7c16603a75dd5759dd509991ce38e55dd1b28405","publicationId":"1c288951-5aad-4543-8308-38dff9c714c2","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","sourceTitle":"Understanding the Effects of Multi-Agent Deliberation for Human-AI Decision-Making","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-11","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-13T07:39:50.366Z","createdAt":"2026-11-13T11:01:21.081Z","historical":false,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"b81add7b79d9380ec00193a5f7248e26ae57fae1ab43f07e3ba31f169c00c2e4","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-13T10:46:49.878Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","checkedAt":"2026-11-13T11:32:11.871Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v7","mediaId":"b81add7b79d9380ec00193a5f7248e26ae57fae1ab43f07e3ba31f169c00c2e4","confidence":0.62,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"4386497c2d20190bfb3337d3e8c3e4b4b6d1ef5333e49c18ef7d3051c0c377bb","decidedAt":"2026-11-13T10:46:50.401Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"fdcc8b9f60fc53198d99a4e6d5f88f94de8d446b2980c04dcf7eb767df53e8f0","observationId":"36ff6602a7c11bd84b435744881662d82ab4b7cbf2503b175adcba04e4f7e94a","retrievedAt":"2026-11-13T10:46:49.807Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"c73e55b3-e7a3-44fa-8721-ec1d467a86fd"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"56da7e1c-a200-436c-8043-492709ae1c35"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-11-13T11:01:21.081Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Tian, Harry Yizhou","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Yin, Ming","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Tian, Harry Yizhou","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Tian, Harry Yizhou","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"5e4beedf37a7f482baaf94c5c346f9573fd17544165edcda80764611602291e5:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-13T11:32:11.871Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"5e4beedf37a7f482baaf94c5c346f9573fd17544165edcda80764611602291e5","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","contentSha256":"c69ef20d6584540eaa7ea0a1f3d1838859e47d4ab046826877fe08430b442259","textHash":"fdcc8b9f60fc53198d99a4e6d5f88f94de8d446b2980c04dcf7eb767df53e8f0","observedAt":"2026-11-13T11:32:11.871Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Yin, Ming","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Yin, Ming","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"5e4beedf37a7f482baaf94c5c346f9573fd17544165edcda80764611602291e5:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-13T11:32:11.871Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"5e4beedf37a7f482baaf94c5c346f9573fd17544165edcda80764611602291e5","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","contentSha256":"c69ef20d6584540eaa7ea0a1f3d1838859e47d4ab046826877fe08430b442259","textHash":"fdcc8b9f60fc53198d99a4e6d5f88f94de8d446b2980c04dcf7eb767df53e8f0","observedAt":"2026-11-13T11:32:11.871Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":2,"returned":2,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","snapshotId":"5e4beedf37a7f482baaf94c5c346f9573fd17544165edcda80764611602291e5","contentSha256":"c69ef20d6584540eaa7ea0a1f3d1838859e47d4ab046826877fe08430b442259","textHash":"fdcc8b9f60fc53198d99a4e6d5f88f94de8d446b2980c04dcf7eb767df53e8f0","observedAt":"2026-11-13T11:32:11.871Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":41,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/4f4edd506f84778e837038ee7c16603a75dd5759dd509991ce38e55dd1b28405/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/harry-yizhou-tian-and-ming-yin-on-multi-agent-deliberation-4f4edd50","formats":{"html":"/readings/harry-yizhou-tian-and-ming-yin-on-multi-agent-deliberation-4f4edd50","markdown":"/readings/harry-yizhou-tian-and-ming-yin-on-multi-agent-deliberation-4f4edd50.md","json":"/readings/harry-yizhou-tian-and-ming-yin-on-multi-agent-deliberation-4f4edd50.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[{"id":"term-llm","name":"Large language model","explanation":"A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#large-language-model"}],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"4f4edd506f84778e837038ee7c16603a75dd5759dd509991ce38e55dd1b28405","revision":"1c288951-5aad-4543-8308-38dff9c714c2","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"Harry Yizhou Tian and Ming Yin on Multi-Agent Deliberation","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/harry-yizhou-tian-and-ming-yin-on-multi-agent-deliberation-4f4edd50"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","revision":"fdcc8b9f60fc53198d99a4e6d5f88f94de8d446b2980c04dcf7eb767df53e8f0","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Understanding the Effects of Multi-Agent Deliberation for Human-AI Decision-Making","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"4f4edd506f84778e837038ee7c16603a75dd5759dd509991ce38e55dd1b28405","title":"Harry Yizhou Tian and Ming Yin on Multi-Agent Deliberation","argument":"Authors Harry Yizhou Tian and Ming Yin report two user studies of multi-agent deliberation (MAD), where multiple LLMs engage in structured discussion. They tested LLM-response-verification and fact-checking, comparing MAD with other AI decision-support methods. MAD outperformed single-round AI assistance on both tasks; the authors say multi-round interaction was the main driver, while a second AI added value when the single AI had room to improve. The design choices also mattered: a devil’s advocate persona lowered accuracy and user experience, while active human participation improved accuracy in one task at the cost of frustration. The results make MAD more than a question of adding more AI voices: how the discussion is structured and how people take part may affect both decision accuracy and the experience of using the system. The abstract reports results for these two tasks; it does not establish whether the same effects hold in other settings.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The supplied evidence is the paper’s abstract and does not provide study methods, participant details, or results beyond the reported comparisons. The reported findings concern LLM-response-verification and fact-checking; the abstract does not establish whether they generalize to other decision tasks.","speaker":{"name":"Tian, Harry Yizhou, Yin, Ming","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Understanding the Effects of Multi-Agent Deliberation for Human-AI Decision-Making","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","publishedAt":"2026-11-11","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors studied multi-agent deliberation in two human-AI decision tasks: LLM-response-verification and fact-checking.","excerpt":"We conduct two user studies on LLM-response-verification and fact-checking.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that MAD outperformed single-round AI assistance on both tasks, with multi-round interaction the main driver of the benefit.","excerpt":"We find MAD outperformed single-round AI assistance on both tasks; multi-round interaction was the main driver of this benefit","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that a devil’s advocate persona lowered accuracy and user experience, while active human participation improved accuracy in one task at the cost of frustration.","excerpt":"finding a devil's advocate persona to lower accuracy and user experience, while humans' active participation in MAD improved accuracy in one task at the cost of frustration.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","checkedAt":"2026-11-13T11:32:11.871Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"Do multi-agent deliberation’s effects on decision accuracy and user experience hold beyond LLM-response-verification and fact-checking?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Harry Yizhou Tian and Ming Yin on Multi-Agent Deliberation","summary":"Authors Harry Yizhou Tian and Ming Yin report two user studies of multi-agent deliberation (MAD), where multiple LLMs engage in structured discussion. They tested LLM-response-verification and fact-checking, comparing MAD with other AI decision-support methods. MAD outperformed single-round AI assistance on both tasks; the authors say multi-round interaction was the main driver, while a second AI added value when the single AI had room to improve. The design choices also mattered: a devil’s advocate persona lowered accuracy and user experience, while active human participation improved accuracy in one task at the cost of frustration. The results make MAD more than a question of adding more AI voices: how the discussion is structured and how people take part may affect both decision accuracy and the experience of using the system. The abstract reports results for these two tasks; it does not establish whether the same effects hold in other settings.","question":"Do multi-agent deliberation’s effects on decision accuracy and user experience hold beyond LLM-response-verification and fact-checking?","claims":[{"text":"The authors studied multi-agent deliberation in two human-AI decision tasks: LLM-response-verification and fact-checking.","excerpt":"We conduct two user studies on LLM-response-verification and fact-checking.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that MAD outperformed single-round AI assistance on both tasks, with multi-round interaction the main driver of the benefit.","excerpt":"We find MAD outperformed single-round AI assistance on both tasks; multi-round interaction was the main driver of this benefit","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that a devil’s advocate persona lowered accuracy and user experience, while active human participation improved accuracy in one task at the cost of frustration.","excerpt":"finding a devil's advocate persona to lower accuracy and user experience, while humans' active participation in MAD improved accuracy in one task at the cost of frustration.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The supplied evidence is the paper’s abstract and does not provide study methods, participant details, or results beyond the reported comparisons.","The reported findings concern LLM-response-verification and fact-checking; the abstract does not establish whether they generalize to other decision tasks."],"mediaId":"b81add7b79d9380ec00193a5f7248e26ae57fae1ab43f07e3ba31f169c00c2e4","correctionReason":null,"id":"4f4edd506f84778e837038ee7c16603a75dd5759dd509991ce38e55dd1b28405","publicationId":"1c288951-5aad-4543-8308-38dff9c714c2","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","sourceTitle":"Understanding the Effects of Multi-Agent Deliberation for Human-AI Decision-Making","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-11","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-13T07:39:50.366Z","createdAt":"2026-11-13T11:01:21.081Z","historical":false,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"b81add7b79d9380ec00193a5f7248e26ae57fae1ab43f07e3ba31f169c00c2e4","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-13T10:46:49.878Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","checkedAt":"2026-11-13T11:32:11.871Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v7","mediaId":"b81add7b79d9380ec00193a5f7248e26ae57fae1ab43f07e3ba31f169c00c2e4","confidence":0.62,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"4386497c2d20190bfb3337d3e8c3e4b4b6d1ef5333e49c18ef7d3051c0c377bb","decidedAt":"2026-11-13T10:46:50.401Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"fdcc8b9f60fc53198d99a4e6d5f88f94de8d446b2980c04dcf7eb767df53e8f0","observationId":"36ff6602a7c11bd84b435744881662d82ab4b7cbf2503b175adcba04e4f7e94a","retrievedAt":"2026-11-13T10:46:49.807Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"c73e55b3-e7a3-44fa-8721-ec1d467a86fd"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"56da7e1c-a200-436c-8043-492709ae1c35"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-11-13T11:01:21.081Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Tian, Harry Yizhou","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Yin, Ming","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Tian, Harry Yizhou","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Tian, Harry Yizhou","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"5e4beedf37a7f482baaf94c5c346f9573fd17544165edcda80764611602291e5:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-13T11:32:11.871Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"5e4beedf37a7f482baaf94c5c346f9573fd17544165edcda80764611602291e5","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","contentSha256":"c69ef20d6584540eaa7ea0a1f3d1838859e47d4ab046826877fe08430b442259","textHash":"fdcc8b9f60fc53198d99a4e6d5f88f94de8d446b2980c04dcf7eb767df53e8f0","observedAt":"2026-11-13T11:32:11.871Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Yin, Ming","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Yin, Ming","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"5e4beedf37a7f482baaf94c5c346f9573fd17544165edcda80764611602291e5:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-13T11:32:11.871Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"5e4beedf37a7f482baaf94c5c346f9573fd17544165edcda80764611602291e5","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","contentSha256":"c69ef20d6584540eaa7ea0a1f3d1838859e47d4ab046826877fe08430b442259","textHash":"fdcc8b9f60fc53198d99a4e6d5f88f94de8d446b2980c04dcf7eb767df53e8f0","observedAt":"2026-11-13T11:32:11.871Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":2,"returned":2,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14901","snapshotId":"5e4beedf37a7f482baaf94c5c346f9573fd17544165edcda80764611602291e5","contentSha256":"c69ef20d6584540eaa7ea0a1f3d1838859e47d4ab046826877fe08430b442259","textHash":"fdcc8b9f60fc53198d99a4e6d5f88f94de8d446b2980c04dcf7eb767df53e8f0","observedAt":"2026-11-13T11:32:11.871Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":41,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/4f4edd506f84778e837038ee7c16603a75dd5759dd509991ce38e55dd1b28405/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"1c288951-5aad-4543-8308-38dff9c714c2","verdict":"passed","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The reading correctly credits the findings to authors Harry Yizhou Tian and Ming Yin and presents them as the authors' reported results, not as established facts.","excerpt":"Authors:Harry Yizhou Tian, Ming Yin"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"pass","explanation":"The reading defines MAD in plain words, names both tasks and compares MAD with single-round assistance. It keeps the persona and engagement findings, including the frustration cost. The closing interpretation is hedged with 'may' and follows the abstract. The question asks about generalization, which the abstract leaves open. A small optional repair is to add the abstract's motivation: MAD's benchmark gains had not been tested for whether they help human decisions. LLM and LLM-response-verification are left unexplained. These could use term-library tooltips, but they do not block understanding.","excerpt":"improves AI performance on many benchmarks, but whether it helps humans make better decisions remains untested"},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The originalPublished date of 2026-11-11 matches the v1 submission date shown on the arXiv page.","excerpt":"[Submitted on 11 Nov 2026]"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"Every claim matches the abstract word for word or nearly so: two user studies, MAD outperforming single-round assistance, multi-round interaction as the main driver, the conditional value of a second AI, and the persona and engagement effects. The limitations correctly state that only the abstract is available and that results may not extend beyond these tasks. No benefits or costs were invented.","excerpt":"a second AI added value when the single AI had room to improve"},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper, which is the most direct way for readers to reach the source.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-13T11:01:21.081Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}