{"id":"675cfe340cc244c9a8d7497e86d6d21aef8af746eb2b722ae89de604a2c2fffc","title":"Heidari and Mohseni’s arXiv paper proposes a human-centered test for delegating science to AI","argument":"Hoda Heidari and Aydin Mohseni argue that deciding how to use AI in science depends on why humans should continue doing science. They identify durable, collective human understanding, pursued in service of human ends and values, as an indispensable aim.\n\nTheir framework asks whether a scientific community can still explain, defend and contest claims produced with AI, and retain the skills to do so. It also says accountable humans should decide which questions matter and what findings mean. The authors apply this two-part test across research phases, including peer review and training new researchers, and offer recommendations that fields can tailor to their methods and questions.\n\nThe proposal makes the consequences for human understanding and direction—not the type of AI tool—the basis for judging each use. The abstract describes a framework and recommendations, not evidence that applying them has improved research. How would a field determine whether researchers retain the skills to explain, defend and contest AI-produced claims?","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The supplied evidence is the paper's abstract; it does not describe empirical evaluation of the framework or whether applying it improves research. The abstract says the paper closes with needed reforms but does not specify those reforms.","speaker":{"name":"Heidari, Hoda, Mohseni, Aydin","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Why and How to Do Science When AI Is Better at It: A Framework Grounded in Human Understanding and Direction","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","publishedAt":"2026-10-26","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"Heidari and Mohseni argue that one indispensable aim of science is durable, collective human understanding of the world in service of human ends and values.","excerpt":"one indispensable aim of science is \\emph{durable, collective human understanding of the world, pursued in service of human ends and values}","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Their proposed test for delegating research tasks to AI has two parts: human understanding and human direction.","excerpt":"From this principle it derives a two-part test for when a research task can be delegated to AI.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The human-understanding part requires the scientific community to be able to explain, defend and contest resulting claims, and retain the skills to do so.","excerpt":"requires that the scientific community remain able to explain, defend and contest the resulting claims, and retain the skills to do so.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The human-direction part keeps judgments about important questions and the meaning of findings with accountable humans.","excerpt":"requires that judgments about which questions matter and what findings mean stay with accountable humans.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors apply the test to research phases in the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT), including peer review and training new researchers, and say fields can tailor recommendations to their questions and methods.","excerpt":"Applying the test to each phase of research in the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) yields recommendations that fields can tailor to their questions and methods.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say their framework judges AI use by its effects on human understanding and direction rather than by the type of tool.","excerpt":"it judges each use of AI by its effects on human understanding and direction rather than by the type of tool","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","checkedAt":"2026-10-30T03:40:36.150Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How would a field determine whether researchers retain the skills to explain, defend and contest AI-produced claims?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Heidari and Mohseni’s arXiv paper proposes a human-centered test for delegating science to AI","summary":"Hoda Heidari and Aydin Mohseni argue that deciding how to use AI in science depends on why humans should continue doing science. They identify durable, collective human understanding, pursued in service of human ends and values, as an indispensable aim.\n\nTheir framework asks whether a scientific community can still explain, defend and contest claims produced with AI, and retain the skills to do so. It also says accountable humans should decide which questions matter and what findings mean. The authors apply this two-part test across research phases, including peer review and training new researchers, and offer recommendations that fields can tailor to their methods and questions.\n\nThe proposal makes the consequences for human understanding and direction—not the type of AI tool—the basis for judging each use. The abstract describes a framework and recommendations, not evidence that applying them has improved research. How would a field determine whether researchers retain the skills to explain, defend and contest AI-produced claims?","question":"How would a field determine whether researchers retain the skills to explain, defend and contest AI-produced claims?","claims":[{"text":"Heidari and Mohseni argue that one indispensable aim of science is durable, collective human understanding of the world in service of human ends and values.","excerpt":"one indispensable aim of science is \\emph{durable, collective human understanding of the world, pursued in service of human ends and values}","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Their proposed test for delegating research tasks to AI has two parts: human understanding and human direction.","excerpt":"From this principle it derives a two-part test for when a research task can be delegated to AI.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The human-understanding part requires the scientific community to be able to explain, defend and contest resulting claims, and retain the skills to do so.","excerpt":"requires that the scientific community remain able to explain, defend and contest the resulting claims, and retain the skills to do so.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The human-direction part keeps judgments about important questions and the meaning of findings with accountable humans.","excerpt":"requires that judgments about which questions matter and what findings mean stay with accountable humans.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors apply the test to research phases in the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT), including peer review and training new researchers, and say fields can tailor recommendations to their questions and methods.","excerpt":"Applying the test to each phase of research in the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) yields recommendations that fields can tailor to their questions and methods.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say their framework judges AI use by its effects on human understanding and direction rather than by the type of tool.","excerpt":"it judges each use of AI by its effects on human understanding and direction rather than by the type of tool","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The supplied evidence is the paper's abstract; it does not describe empirical evaluation of the framework or whether applying it improves research.","The abstract says the paper closes with needed reforms but does not specify those reforms."],"mediaId":"cefc48cf69e7d9b72f0db15a6c1f8810e449298d659d7409767c4c5bfd249e91","correctionReason":null,"id":"675cfe340cc244c9a8d7497e86d6d21aef8af746eb2b722ae89de604a2c2fffc","publicationId":"19a199a0-7f50-4dfd-8de1-5ae6118ba09e","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","sourceTitle":"Why and How to Do Science When AI Is Better at It: A Framework Grounded in Human Understanding and Direction","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-26","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-28T04:38:33.885Z","createdAt":"2026-10-30T01:32:02.929Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"cefc48cf69e7d9b72f0db15a6c1f8810e449298d659d7409767c4c5bfd249e91","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-10-30T01:20:32.042Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","checkedAt":"2026-10-30T03:40:36.150Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["useful_perspective"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"cefc48cf69e7d9b72f0db15a6c1f8810e449298d659d7409767c4c5bfd249e91","confidence":0.88,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"ddddcbca2b3790799f7fd0875e1f56472d93043d7e7b134ff33f27c397396730","decidedAt":"2026-10-30T01:20:35.189Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"726218258150a35d338595960b587d71b1aa7718369161bb08b1e7f8205a8ab4","observationId":"24a00dd16eea2b3afd030f75a5b93f4900ec93c2392994fb3ccc584460e39b49","retrievedAt":"2026-10-30T01:20:31.554Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"65581b6e-79ff-4d58-8938-a411024f10fa"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"932484dd-d997-4920-8017-0e9489675b61"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-10-30T01:32:02.929Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Heidari, Hoda","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Mohseni, Aydin","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Heidari, Hoda","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Heidari, Hoda","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"9fdba882038940c5e716ffc19b8066cd6d8b89dadca7a09d9ee9c712e521b7f7:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-10-30T03:40:36.150Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"9fdba882038940c5e716ffc19b8066cd6d8b89dadca7a09d9ee9c712e521b7f7","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","contentSha256":"b92a0f78f95834f16dffa242ba402eb38ed7f9f14f5e767e81aa3e9d8582291e","textHash":"726218258150a35d338595960b587d71b1aa7718369161bb08b1e7f8205a8ab4","observedAt":"2026-10-30T03:40:36.150Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Mohseni, Aydin","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Mohseni, Aydin","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"9fdba882038940c5e716ffc19b8066cd6d8b89dadca7a09d9ee9c712e521b7f7:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-10-30T03:40:36.150Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"9fdba882038940c5e716ffc19b8066cd6d8b89dadca7a09d9ee9c712e521b7f7","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","contentSha256":"b92a0f78f95834f16dffa242ba402eb38ed7f9f14f5e767e81aa3e9d8582291e","textHash":"726218258150a35d338595960b587d71b1aa7718369161bb08b1e7f8205a8ab4","observedAt":"2026-10-30T03:40:36.150Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":2,"returned":2,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","snapshotId":"9fdba882038940c5e716ffc19b8066cd6d8b89dadca7a09d9ee9c712e521b7f7","contentSha256":"b92a0f78f95834f16dffa242ba402eb38ed7f9f14f5e767e81aa3e9d8582291e","textHash":"726218258150a35d338595960b587d71b1aa7718369161bb08b1e7f8205a8ab4","observedAt":"2026-10-30T03:40:36.150Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":41,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/675cfe340cc244c9a8d7497e86d6d21aef8af746eb2b722ae89de604a2c2fffc/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/heidari-and-mohseni-s-arxiv-paper-proposes-a-human-centered-675cfe34","formats":{"html":"/readings/heidari-and-mohseni-s-arxiv-paper-proposes-a-human-centered-675cfe34","markdown":"/readings/heidari-and-mohseni-s-arxiv-paper-proposes-a-human-centered-675cfe34.md","json":"/readings/heidari-and-mohseni-s-arxiv-paper-proposes-a-human-centered-675cfe34.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"675cfe340cc244c9a8d7497e86d6d21aef8af746eb2b722ae89de604a2c2fffc","revision":"19a199a0-7f50-4dfd-8de1-5ae6118ba09e","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"Heidari and Mohseni’s arXiv paper proposes a human-centered test for delegating science to AI","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/heidari-and-mohseni-s-arxiv-paper-proposes-a-human-centered-675cfe34"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","revision":"726218258150a35d338595960b587d71b1aa7718369161bb08b1e7f8205a8ab4","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Why and How to Do Science When AI Is Better at It: A Framework Grounded in Human Understanding and Direction","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"675cfe340cc244c9a8d7497e86d6d21aef8af746eb2b722ae89de604a2c2fffc","title":"Heidari and Mohseni’s arXiv paper proposes a human-centered test for delegating science to AI","argument":"Hoda Heidari and Aydin Mohseni argue that deciding how to use AI in science depends on why humans should continue doing science. They identify durable, collective human understanding, pursued in service of human ends and values, as an indispensable aim.\n\nTheir framework asks whether a scientific community can still explain, defend and contest claims produced with AI, and retain the skills to do so. It also says accountable humans should decide which questions matter and what findings mean. The authors apply this two-part test across research phases, including peer review and training new researchers, and offer recommendations that fields can tailor to their methods and questions.\n\nThe proposal makes the consequences for human understanding and direction—not the type of AI tool—the basis for judging each use. The abstract describes a framework and recommendations, not evidence that applying them has improved research. How would a field determine whether researchers retain the skills to explain, defend and contest AI-produced claims?","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The supplied evidence is the paper's abstract; it does not describe empirical evaluation of the framework or whether applying it improves research. The abstract says the paper closes with needed reforms but does not specify those reforms.","speaker":{"name":"Heidari, Hoda, Mohseni, Aydin","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Why and How to Do Science When AI Is Better at It: A Framework Grounded in Human Understanding and Direction","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","publishedAt":"2026-10-26","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"Heidari and Mohseni argue that one indispensable aim of science is durable, collective human understanding of the world in service of human ends and values.","excerpt":"one indispensable aim of science is \\emph{durable, collective human understanding of the world, pursued in service of human ends and values}","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Their proposed test for delegating research tasks to AI has two parts: human understanding and human direction.","excerpt":"From this principle it derives a two-part test for when a research task can be delegated to AI.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The human-understanding part requires the scientific community to be able to explain, defend and contest resulting claims, and retain the skills to do so.","excerpt":"requires that the scientific community remain able to explain, defend and contest the resulting claims, and retain the skills to do so.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The human-direction part keeps judgments about important questions and the meaning of findings with accountable humans.","excerpt":"requires that judgments about which questions matter and what findings mean stay with accountable humans.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors apply the test to research phases in the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT), including peer review and training new researchers, and say fields can tailor recommendations to their questions and methods.","excerpt":"Applying the test to each phase of research in the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) yields recommendations that fields can tailor to their questions and methods.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say their framework judges AI use by its effects on human understanding and direction rather than by the type of tool.","excerpt":"it judges each use of AI by its effects on human understanding and direction rather than by the type of tool","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","checkedAt":"2026-10-30T03:40:36.150Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How would a field determine whether researchers retain the skills to explain, defend and contest AI-produced claims?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Heidari and Mohseni’s arXiv paper proposes a human-centered test for delegating science to AI","summary":"Hoda Heidari and Aydin Mohseni argue that deciding how to use AI in science depends on why humans should continue doing science. They identify durable, collective human understanding, pursued in service of human ends and values, as an indispensable aim.\n\nTheir framework asks whether a scientific community can still explain, defend and contest claims produced with AI, and retain the skills to do so. It also says accountable humans should decide which questions matter and what findings mean. The authors apply this two-part test across research phases, including peer review and training new researchers, and offer recommendations that fields can tailor to their methods and questions.\n\nThe proposal makes the consequences for human understanding and direction—not the type of AI tool—the basis for judging each use. The abstract describes a framework and recommendations, not evidence that applying them has improved research. How would a field determine whether researchers retain the skills to explain, defend and contest AI-produced claims?","question":"How would a field determine whether researchers retain the skills to explain, defend and contest AI-produced claims?","claims":[{"text":"Heidari and Mohseni argue that one indispensable aim of science is durable, collective human understanding of the world in service of human ends and values.","excerpt":"one indispensable aim of science is \\emph{durable, collective human understanding of the world, pursued in service of human ends and values}","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Their proposed test for delegating research tasks to AI has two parts: human understanding and human direction.","excerpt":"From this principle it derives a two-part test for when a research task can be delegated to AI.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The human-understanding part requires the scientific community to be able to explain, defend and contest resulting claims, and retain the skills to do so.","excerpt":"requires that the scientific community remain able to explain, defend and contest the resulting claims, and retain the skills to do so.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The human-direction part keeps judgments about important questions and the meaning of findings with accountable humans.","excerpt":"requires that judgments about which questions matter and what findings mean stay with accountable humans.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors apply the test to research phases in the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT), including peer review and training new researchers, and say fields can tailor recommendations to their questions and methods.","excerpt":"Applying the test to each phase of research in the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) yields recommendations that fields can tailor to their questions and methods.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say their framework judges AI use by its effects on human understanding and direction rather than by the type of tool.","excerpt":"it judges each use of AI by its effects on human understanding and direction rather than by the type of tool","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The supplied evidence is the paper's abstract; it does not describe empirical evaluation of the framework or whether applying it improves research.","The abstract says the paper closes with needed reforms but does not specify those reforms."],"mediaId":"cefc48cf69e7d9b72f0db15a6c1f8810e449298d659d7409767c4c5bfd249e91","correctionReason":null,"id":"675cfe340cc244c9a8d7497e86d6d21aef8af746eb2b722ae89de604a2c2fffc","publicationId":"19a199a0-7f50-4dfd-8de1-5ae6118ba09e","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","sourceTitle":"Why and How to Do Science When AI Is Better at It: A Framework Grounded in Human Understanding and Direction","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-26","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-28T04:38:33.885Z","createdAt":"2026-10-30T01:32:02.929Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"cefc48cf69e7d9b72f0db15a6c1f8810e449298d659d7409767c4c5bfd249e91","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-10-30T01:20:32.042Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","checkedAt":"2026-10-30T03:40:36.150Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["useful_perspective"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"cefc48cf69e7d9b72f0db15a6c1f8810e449298d659d7409767c4c5bfd249e91","confidence":0.88,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"ddddcbca2b3790799f7fd0875e1f56472d93043d7e7b134ff33f27c397396730","decidedAt":"2026-10-30T01:20:35.189Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"726218258150a35d338595960b587d71b1aa7718369161bb08b1e7f8205a8ab4","observationId":"24a00dd16eea2b3afd030f75a5b93f4900ec93c2392994fb3ccc584460e39b49","retrievedAt":"2026-10-30T01:20:31.554Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"65581b6e-79ff-4d58-8938-a411024f10fa"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"932484dd-d997-4920-8017-0e9489675b61"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-10-30T01:32:02.929Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Heidari, Hoda","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Mohseni, Aydin","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Heidari, Hoda","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Heidari, Hoda","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"9fdba882038940c5e716ffc19b8066cd6d8b89dadca7a09d9ee9c712e521b7f7:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-10-30T03:40:36.150Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"9fdba882038940c5e716ffc19b8066cd6d8b89dadca7a09d9ee9c712e521b7f7","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","contentSha256":"b92a0f78f95834f16dffa242ba402eb38ed7f9f14f5e767e81aa3e9d8582291e","textHash":"726218258150a35d338595960b587d71b1aa7718369161bb08b1e7f8205a8ab4","observedAt":"2026-10-30T03:40:36.150Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Mohseni, Aydin","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Mohseni, Aydin","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"9fdba882038940c5e716ffc19b8066cd6d8b89dadca7a09d9ee9c712e521b7f7:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-10-30T03:40:36.150Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"9fdba882038940c5e716ffc19b8066cd6d8b89dadca7a09d9ee9c712e521b7f7","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","contentSha256":"b92a0f78f95834f16dffa242ba402eb38ed7f9f14f5e767e81aa3e9d8582291e","textHash":"726218258150a35d338595960b587d71b1aa7718369161bb08b1e7f8205a8ab4","observedAt":"2026-10-30T03:40:36.150Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":2,"returned":2,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36116","snapshotId":"9fdba882038940c5e716ffc19b8066cd6d8b89dadca7a09d9ee9c712e521b7f7","contentSha256":"b92a0f78f95834f16dffa242ba402eb38ed7f9f14f5e767e81aa3e9d8582291e","textHash":"726218258150a35d338595960b587d71b1aa7718369161bb08b1e7f8205a8ab4","observedAt":"2026-10-30T03:40:36.150Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":41,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/675cfe340cc244c9a8d7497e86d6d21aef8af746eb2b722ae89de604a2c2fffc/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"19a199a0-7f50-4dfd-8de1-5ae6118ba09e","verdict":"passed","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The draft correctly attributes the paper and its arguments to authors Hoda Heidari and Aydin Mohseni, as listed on the arXiv page.","excerpt":"Authors:Hoda Heidari, Aydin Mohseni"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"pass","explanation":"The title, summary and question accurately present the paper's thesis: why science matters determines how to use AI, followed by a two-part test of human understanding and human direction. The summary explains this in plain language a non-specialist can follow and avoids unexplained jargon. The question follows from the skills-retention requirement and is not leading.","excerpt":"This paper argues that the second can be answered only by answering the first."},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The originalPublished date of 2026-10-26 matches the v1 submission date on the arXiv page. The later feed date is correctly not used.","excerpt":"[Submitted on 26 Oct 2026]"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"Each claim is directly supported by the abstract. The draft avoids implying demonstrated benefits and explicitly notes that the abstract offers a framework, not evidence of improved research. The limitations are accurate. Folding peer review and researcher training into the research-phase application is consistent with the abstract's statement that the framework covers every phase.","excerpt":"across every phase of research, including peer review and the training of new researchers"},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper. It is the most direct way to access the source.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-10-30T01:32:02.929Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}