{"id":"f1db44a0c9c1eea3856572b122eea382ae48dbd1a14bf4c8166a41b62c17500a","title":"Jain and Vedam argue monitor accuracy misses whether restarting an AI agent helps","argument":"In their arXiv paper, Siddharth Jain and Venkat N. Vedam argue that classification accuracy alone cannot show whether restarting an AI agent improves its chance of success. The outcome also depends on the replacement attempt’s residual-budget success probability: how likely it is to succeed with the time or resources left. Their analysis says a monitor with fixed 90% accuracy can correspond to a five-percentage-point loss or a 35-point gain, depending on that probability.\n\nThe authors propose judging monitors by whether their information helps choose between “restart” and “continue,” and by whether existing traces provide enough statistical support for that choice. In their study of selected SymPy issues, the apparent restart benefit did not replicate positively on prospective task cohorts; none of 103 live comparisons met their specified certification bar. The paper’s point is not that restarting never helps, but that classification scores are not a decision rule: a signal matters when it can support a choice under the available recovery opportunity and evidence.\n\nHow often would the authors’ audit return a certified “restart” or “continue” recommendation on task cohorts beyond those studied?","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The reported study covers 194 externally evaluated model executions on 19 selected SymPy issues from SWE-bench Verified, with a retrospective audit of 130 traces; the abstract does not establish how results generalize to other tasks or settings. The abstract reports results and methods but does not provide enough detail to independently assess the sampling assumptions or the specified certification bar.","speaker":{"name":"Jain, Siddharth, Vedam, Venkat N.","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Monitor Accuracy Isn't the Answer: A Decision-Value Framework for Evaluating AI Agent Restart Monitors","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","publishedAt":"2026-10-27","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"Jain and Vedam argue that classification accuracy and error rates alone do not determine whether restarting an AI agent improves success.","excerpt":"Classification accuracy and true-positive and false-positive rates alone do not determine whether restarting an AI agent improves success.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that a monitor with fixed 90% accuracy can be associated with a five-percentage-point loss or a 35-point gain, depending on the replacement attempt's residual-budget success probability.","excerpt":"a monitor with fixed 90% accuracy can swing from a five-percentage-point loss to a 35-point gain in success rate, depending solely on the replacement attempt's residual-budget success probability.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"In their study, the authors found no positive replication of the initial apparent restart gain on prospective task cohorts, and zero of 103 live comparisons met their specified certification bar.","excerpt":"no positive replication of the initial gain on prospective task cohorts, and zero of 103 live comparisons meeting the specified certification bar.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","checkedAt":"2026-11-14T00:34:08.554Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How often would the authors’ audit return a certified “restart” or “continue” recommendation on task cohorts beyond those studied?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Jain and Vedam argue monitor accuracy misses whether restarting an AI agent helps","summary":"In their arXiv paper, Siddharth Jain and Venkat N. Vedam argue that classification accuracy alone cannot show whether restarting an AI agent improves its chance of success. The outcome also depends on the replacement attempt’s residual-budget success probability: how likely it is to succeed with the time or resources left. Their analysis says a monitor with fixed 90% accuracy can correspond to a five-percentage-point loss or a 35-point gain, depending on that probability.\n\nThe authors propose judging monitors by whether their information helps choose between “restart” and “continue,” and by whether existing traces provide enough statistical support for that choice. In their study of selected SymPy issues, the apparent restart benefit did not replicate positively on prospective task cohorts; none of 103 live comparisons met their specified certification bar. The paper’s point is not that restarting never helps, but that classification scores are not a decision rule: a signal matters when it can support a choice under the available recovery opportunity and evidence.\n\nHow often would the authors’ audit return a certified “restart” or “continue” recommendation on task cohorts beyond those studied?","question":"How often would the authors’ audit return a certified “restart” or “continue” recommendation on task cohorts beyond those studied?","claims":[{"text":"Jain and Vedam argue that classification accuracy and error rates alone do not determine whether restarting an AI agent improves success.","excerpt":"Classification accuracy and true-positive and false-positive rates alone do not determine whether restarting an AI agent improves success.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that a monitor with fixed 90% accuracy can be associated with a five-percentage-point loss or a 35-point gain, depending on the replacement attempt's residual-budget success probability.","excerpt":"a monitor with fixed 90% accuracy can swing from a five-percentage-point loss to a 35-point gain in success rate, depending solely on the replacement attempt's residual-budget success probability.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"In their study, the authors found no positive replication of the initial apparent restart gain on prospective task cohorts, and zero of 103 live comparisons met their specified certification bar.","excerpt":"no positive replication of the initial gain on prospective task cohorts, and zero of 103 live comparisons meeting the specified certification bar.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The reported study covers 194 externally evaluated model executions on 19 selected SymPy issues from SWE-bench Verified, with a retrospective audit of 130 traces; the abstract does not establish how results generalize to other tasks or settings.","The abstract reports results and methods but does not provide enough detail to independently assess the sampling assumptions or the specified certification bar."],"mediaId":"583519ff11ee292e21098a09d93b6af484eb8d7729f1bde0b6682a8f6ed136c2","correctionReason":null,"id":"f1db44a0c9c1eea3856572b122eea382ae48dbd1a14bf4c8166a41b62c17500a","publicationId":"5b5267c4-3594-4592-89b7-f9d4d808b30c","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","sourceTitle":"Monitor Accuracy Isn't the Answer: A Decision-Value Framework for Evaluating AI Agent Restart Monitors","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-27","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-28T05:26:32.404Z","createdAt":"2026-11-14T00:03:13.495Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"583519ff11ee292e21098a09d93b6af484eb8d7729f1bde0b6682a8f6ed136c2","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-10-30T23:04:12.647Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","checkedAt":"2026-11-14T00:34:08.554Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["useful_perspective"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"583519ff11ee292e21098a09d93b6af484eb8d7729f1bde0b6682a8f6ed136c2","confidence":0.88,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"b8121bd018d6db9c1f785c1896f0096c7a1af657918c8de0e65c01fc7cc3572d","decidedAt":"2026-10-30T23:04:14.527Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"62909d9117ec2fe10e1ac27c79e3e5e145a013e266f27c1a7941d9fd4bfb65bd","observationId":"6a83944c707d77bc22ca26d77954c08f0734c3ad2a66d7ca9489b57303934a88","retrievedAt":"2026-10-30T23:04:12.352Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"8436ce8b-2b2e-4e66-8b4a-54a9b7943b53"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"0e636a71-9cdd-474c-8f9c-c4d229023848"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-14T00:03:13.495Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Jain, Siddharth","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Vedam, Venkat N.","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Jain, Siddharth","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Jain, Siddharth","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"b2b54ab82937a12cc24b66dd306f1b77f18ba2ed826b0e051d416d6f5ad3e78a:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-14T00:06:10.679Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"b2b54ab82937a12cc24b66dd306f1b77f18ba2ed826b0e051d416d6f5ad3e78a","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","contentSha256":"87d8684a26f1a252b6b647dd0e61e95617939e76f6030cf7bad6734ab1e2cf8d","textHash":"62909d9117ec2fe10e1ac27c79e3e5e145a013e266f27c1a7941d9fd4bfb65bd","observedAt":"2026-11-14T00:06:10.679Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Vedam, Venkat N.","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Vedam, Venkat N.","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"b2b54ab82937a12cc24b66dd306f1b77f18ba2ed826b0e051d416d6f5ad3e78a:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-14T00:06:10.679Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"b2b54ab82937a12cc24b66dd306f1b77f18ba2ed826b0e051d416d6f5ad3e78a","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","contentSha256":"87d8684a26f1a252b6b647dd0e61e95617939e76f6030cf7bad6734ab1e2cf8d","textHash":"62909d9117ec2fe10e1ac27c79e3e5e145a013e266f27c1a7941d9fd4bfb65bd","observedAt":"2026-11-14T00:06:10.679Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":2,"returned":2,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","snapshotId":"b2b54ab82937a12cc24b66dd306f1b77f18ba2ed826b0e051d416d6f5ad3e78a","contentSha256":"87d8684a26f1a252b6b647dd0e61e95617939e76f6030cf7bad6734ab1e2cf8d","textHash":"62909d9117ec2fe10e1ac27c79e3e5e145a013e266f27c1a7941d9fd4bfb65bd","observedAt":"2026-11-14T00:06:10.679Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":41,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/f1db44a0c9c1eea3856572b122eea382ae48dbd1a14bf4c8166a41b62c17500a/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/jain-and-vedam-argue-monitor-accuracy-misses-whether-restarting-f1db44a0","formats":{"html":"/readings/jain-and-vedam-argue-monitor-accuracy-misses-whether-restarting-f1db44a0","markdown":"/readings/jain-and-vedam-argue-monitor-accuracy-misses-whether-restarting-f1db44a0.md","json":"/readings/jain-and-vedam-argue-monitor-accuracy-misses-whether-restarting-f1db44a0.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"conditions":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[{"id":"term-ai-agent","name":"AI agent","explanation":"An AI system that chooses and carries out actions toward a goal, often using software tools.","referenceUrl":"https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/ai-agents"}],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"},{"id":"time","name":"TIME","kind":"organization","context":"TIME is a news magazine publishing reporting on world affairs, business, technology and the workers behind digital services.","referenceUrls":["https://time.com/"],"path":"/entities/time","json":"/entities/time.json","markdown":"/entities/time.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"f1db44a0c9c1eea3856572b122eea382ae48dbd1a14bf4c8166a41b62c17500a","revision":"5b5267c4-3594-4592-89b7-f9d4d808b30c","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"Jain and Vedam argue monitor accuracy misses whether restarting an AI agent helps","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/jain-and-vedam-argue-monitor-accuracy-misses-whether-restarting-f1db44a0"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","revision":"62909d9117ec2fe10e1ac27c79e3e5e145a013e266f27c1a7941d9fd4bfb65bd","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Monitor Accuracy Isn't the Answer: A Decision-Value Framework for Evaluating AI Agent Restart Monitors","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"f1db44a0c9c1eea3856572b122eea382ae48dbd1a14bf4c8166a41b62c17500a","title":"Jain and Vedam argue monitor accuracy misses whether restarting an AI agent helps","argument":"In their arXiv paper, Siddharth Jain and Venkat N. Vedam argue that classification accuracy alone cannot show whether restarting an AI agent improves its chance of success. The outcome also depends on the replacement attempt’s residual-budget success probability: how likely it is to succeed with the time or resources left. Their analysis says a monitor with fixed 90% accuracy can correspond to a five-percentage-point loss or a 35-point gain, depending on that probability.\n\nThe authors propose judging monitors by whether their information helps choose between “restart” and “continue,” and by whether existing traces provide enough statistical support for that choice. In their study of selected SymPy issues, the apparent restart benefit did not replicate positively on prospective task cohorts; none of 103 live comparisons met their specified certification bar. The paper’s point is not that restarting never helps, but that classification scores are not a decision rule: a signal matters when it can support a choice under the available recovery opportunity and evidence.\n\nHow often would the authors’ audit return a certified “restart” or “continue” recommendation on task cohorts beyond those studied?","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The reported study covers 194 externally evaluated model executions on 19 selected SymPy issues from SWE-bench Verified, with a retrospective audit of 130 traces; the abstract does not establish how results generalize to other tasks or settings. The abstract reports results and methods but does not provide enough detail to independently assess the sampling assumptions or the specified certification bar.","speaker":{"name":"Jain, Siddharth, Vedam, Venkat N.","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Monitor Accuracy Isn't the Answer: A Decision-Value Framework for Evaluating AI Agent Restart Monitors","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","publishedAt":"2026-10-27","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"Jain and Vedam argue that classification accuracy and error rates alone do not determine whether restarting an AI agent improves success.","excerpt":"Classification accuracy and true-positive and false-positive rates alone do not determine whether restarting an AI agent improves success.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that a monitor with fixed 90% accuracy can be associated with a five-percentage-point loss or a 35-point gain, depending on the replacement attempt's residual-budget success probability.","excerpt":"a monitor with fixed 90% accuracy can swing from a five-percentage-point loss to a 35-point gain in success rate, depending solely on the replacement attempt's residual-budget success probability.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"In their study, the authors found no positive replication of the initial apparent restart gain on prospective task cohorts, and zero of 103 live comparisons met their specified certification bar.","excerpt":"no positive replication of the initial gain on prospective task cohorts, and zero of 103 live comparisons meeting the specified certification bar.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","checkedAt":"2026-11-14T00:34:08.554Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How often would the authors’ audit return a certified “restart” or “continue” recommendation on task cohorts beyond those studied?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Jain and Vedam argue monitor accuracy misses whether restarting an AI agent helps","summary":"In their arXiv paper, Siddharth Jain and Venkat N. Vedam argue that classification accuracy alone cannot show whether restarting an AI agent improves its chance of success. The outcome also depends on the replacement attempt’s residual-budget success probability: how likely it is to succeed with the time or resources left. Their analysis says a monitor with fixed 90% accuracy can correspond to a five-percentage-point loss or a 35-point gain, depending on that probability.\n\nThe authors propose judging monitors by whether their information helps choose between “restart” and “continue,” and by whether existing traces provide enough statistical support for that choice. In their study of selected SymPy issues, the apparent restart benefit did not replicate positively on prospective task cohorts; none of 103 live comparisons met their specified certification bar. The paper’s point is not that restarting never helps, but that classification scores are not a decision rule: a signal matters when it can support a choice under the available recovery opportunity and evidence.\n\nHow often would the authors’ audit return a certified “restart” or “continue” recommendation on task cohorts beyond those studied?","question":"How often would the authors’ audit return a certified “restart” or “continue” recommendation on task cohorts beyond those studied?","claims":[{"text":"Jain and Vedam argue that classification accuracy and error rates alone do not determine whether restarting an AI agent improves success.","excerpt":"Classification accuracy and true-positive and false-positive rates alone do not determine whether restarting an AI agent improves success.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors report that a monitor with fixed 90% accuracy can be associated with a five-percentage-point loss or a 35-point gain, depending on the replacement attempt's residual-budget success probability.","excerpt":"a monitor with fixed 90% accuracy can swing from a five-percentage-point loss to a 35-point gain in success rate, depending solely on the replacement attempt's residual-budget success probability.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"In their study, the authors found no positive replication of the initial apparent restart gain on prospective task cohorts, and zero of 103 live comparisons met their specified certification bar.","excerpt":"no positive replication of the initial gain on prospective task cohorts, and zero of 103 live comparisons meeting the specified certification bar.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The reported study covers 194 externally evaluated model executions on 19 selected SymPy issues from SWE-bench Verified, with a retrospective audit of 130 traces; the abstract does not establish how results generalize to other tasks or settings.","The abstract reports results and methods but does not provide enough detail to independently assess the sampling assumptions or the specified certification bar."],"mediaId":"583519ff11ee292e21098a09d93b6af484eb8d7729f1bde0b6682a8f6ed136c2","correctionReason":null,"id":"f1db44a0c9c1eea3856572b122eea382ae48dbd1a14bf4c8166a41b62c17500a","publicationId":"5b5267c4-3594-4592-89b7-f9d4d808b30c","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","sourceTitle":"Monitor Accuracy Isn't the Answer: A Decision-Value Framework for Evaluating AI Agent Restart Monitors","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-27","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-28T05:26:32.404Z","createdAt":"2026-11-14T00:03:13.495Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"583519ff11ee292e21098a09d93b6af484eb8d7729f1bde0b6682a8f6ed136c2","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-10-30T23:04:12.647Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","checkedAt":"2026-11-14T00:34:08.554Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["useful_perspective"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"583519ff11ee292e21098a09d93b6af484eb8d7729f1bde0b6682a8f6ed136c2","confidence":0.88,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"b8121bd018d6db9c1f785c1896f0096c7a1af657918c8de0e65c01fc7cc3572d","decidedAt":"2026-10-30T23:04:14.527Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"62909d9117ec2fe10e1ac27c79e3e5e145a013e266f27c1a7941d9fd4bfb65bd","observationId":"6a83944c707d77bc22ca26d77954c08f0734c3ad2a66d7ca9489b57303934a88","retrievedAt":"2026-10-30T23:04:12.352Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"8436ce8b-2b2e-4e66-8b4a-54a9b7943b53"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"0e636a71-9cdd-474c-8f9c-c4d229023848"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-14T00:03:13.495Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Jain, Siddharth","url":null,"kind":"unknown"},{"name":"Vedam, Venkat N.","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Jain, Siddharth","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Jain, Siddharth","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"b2b54ab82937a12cc24b66dd306f1b77f18ba2ed826b0e051d416d6f5ad3e78a:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-14T00:06:10.679Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"b2b54ab82937a12cc24b66dd306f1b77f18ba2ed826b0e051d416d6f5ad3e78a","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","contentSha256":"87d8684a26f1a252b6b647dd0e61e95617939e76f6030cf7bad6734ab1e2cf8d","textHash":"62909d9117ec2fe10e1ac27c79e3e5e145a013e266f27c1a7941d9fd4bfb65bd","observedAt":"2026-11-14T00:06:10.679Z"}},{"actor":{"name":"Vedam, Venkat N.","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Vedam, Venkat N.","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"b2b54ab82937a12cc24b66dd306f1b77f18ba2ed826b0e051d416d6f5ad3e78a:participation:1","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-11-14T00:06:10.679Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"b2b54ab82937a12cc24b66dd306f1b77f18ba2ed826b0e051d416d6f5ad3e78a","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","contentSha256":"87d8684a26f1a252b6b647dd0e61e95617939e76f6030cf7bad6734ab1e2cf8d","textHash":"62909d9117ec2fe10e1ac27c79e3e5e145a013e266f27c1a7941d9fd4bfb65bd","observedAt":"2026-11-14T00:06:10.679Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":2,"returned":2,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36544","snapshotId":"b2b54ab82937a12cc24b66dd306f1b77f18ba2ed826b0e051d416d6f5ad3e78a","contentSha256":"87d8684a26f1a252b6b647dd0e61e95617939e76f6030cf7bad6734ab1e2cf8d","textHash":"62909d9117ec2fe10e1ac27c79e3e5e145a013e266f27c1a7941d9fd4bfb65bd","observedAt":"2026-11-14T00:06:10.679Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":41,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/f1db44a0c9c1eea3856572b122eea382ae48dbd1a14bf4c8166a41b62c17500a/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"5b5267c4-3594-4592-89b7-f9d4d808b30c","verdict":"uncertain","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The reading correctly attributes the arguments and findings to Siddharth Jain and Venkat N. Vedam in an arXiv paper. It keeps their claims as authors' assertions rather than established fact.","excerpt":"Authors:Siddharth Jain, Venkat N. Vedam"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"uncertain","explanation":"The core thesis is faithful, but a general reader may struggle. Central terms such as restart monitor (a system that flags when to restart an agent), traces, SymPy issues, prospective task cohorts and certification bar are unexplained. The summary refers to the apparent restart benefit without introducing the 2.29-point gain, which came from one surviving failed attempt. It also omits the 42.29-point loss on a second model. The 90% example drops its stated analytic conditions. Smallest repair: briefly define monitor and traces, and restore those study findings and conditions.","excerpt":"we find a 2.29-point apparent restart gain traced to a single surviving failed attempt, a 42.29-point loss on a second model"},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The originalPublished date of 2026-10-27 matches the v1 submission date. The feed date of 2026-10-29 is later and correctly not used.","excerpt":"[Submitted on 27 Oct 2026]"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"Each claim is directly supported by the abstract. The interpretation that classification scores are not a decision rule follows the authors' own conclusion. The question follows from the zero certified comparisons and the limited cohorts, and is not leading. The limitations accurately state the study's scope.","excerpt":"These results motivate evaluating agent monitors through recovery opportunity, decision value, and statistical support, rather than classification performance alone."},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper. It is the most direct access to the source.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-14T00:03:13.495Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}