{"id":"834b8ce1dee4548971a963ce8e52f9bb7e982ddf6fa0a98cd5067c70b996b67c","title":"Kate Brennan argues A.I. rules should focus on corporate negligence","argument":"Kate Brennan, who leads the policy agenda on A.I. and corporate power at the AI Now Institute, argues that government should focus on corporate negligence and stop harmful products from entering the market. She says A.I. companies’ spending on technology creates pressure to deploy it broadly, including in public institutions and contracts where it may not be fit for purpose or secure. Brennan cites a Bain estimate that, by 2031, companies would need $6 trillion in annual revenue to sustain their current level of capital expenditure, which she says is $1.5 trillion a year. She argues that products causing significant harm, including injury, death or cybersecurity attacks, could be subject to strict liability, whether or not a company knew or should have known of the danger. This excerpt presents Brennan’s perspective; it does not include the full panel’s views. How would lawmakers define significant harm and apply strict liability to A.I. products?","topicIds":["institutions-and-trust","power-and-infrastructure","work-and-agency"],"domain":"work","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The evidence is an excerpt featuring Brennan; it does not include the full roundtable or other experts’ views. The revenue and capital expenditure figures are attributed to Bain’s estimate, not presented as observed outcomes. The excerpt does not specify how lawmakers would define significant harm or apply strict liability to AI products.","speaker":{"name":"AI Now Institute","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"What Should the Rules for A.I. Companies Actually Be? We Asked the Experts. - AI Now Institute","publisher":"AI Now Institute","format":"Article","url":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","publishedAt":"2026-10-26T17:49:25+00:00","dateBasis":"Date stated by the publisher."},"evidence":[{"text":"Kate Brennan leads the policy agenda on AI and corporate power at the AI Now Institute.","excerpt":"Kate Brennan, a former Google tech worker, leads the policy agenda on A.I. and corporate power at the AI Now Institute","url":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Brennan says AI companies’ spending on development creates pressure to deploy the technology broadly, including in public institutions and contracts where it may not be fit for purpose or secure.","excerpt":"they need to push this tech everywhere, into all of our public institutions and contracting, including in areas where A.I. is not fit for purpose, is not secure","url":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Brennan cites a Bain estimate that companies would need $6 trillion in annual revenue by 2031 to sustain capital expenditure of $1.5 trillion a year.","excerpt":"Bain estimates that by 2031, they will have to achieve $6 trillion of revenue annually to sustain their current level of capital expenditure, which is $1.5 trillion a year.","url":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Brennan says products causing significant harm could be subject to strict liability, whether or not the company knew or should have known of the danger.","excerpt":"if your product causes significant harm, whether that’s injury to people, death, cybersecurity attacks, then you could be held strictly liable — meaning whether or not you knew or should have known the danger.","url":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","checkedAt":"2026-10-29T17:26:35.165Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How would lawmakers define significant harm and apply strict liability to A.I. products?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Kate Brennan argues A.I. rules should focus on corporate negligence","summary":"Kate Brennan, who leads the policy agenda on A.I. and corporate power at the AI Now Institute, argues that government should focus on corporate negligence and stop harmful products from entering the market. She says A.I. companies’ spending on technology creates pressure to deploy it broadly, including in public institutions and contracts where it may not be fit for purpose or secure. Brennan cites a Bain estimate that, by 2031, companies would need $6 trillion in annual revenue to sustain their current level of capital expenditure, which she says is $1.5 trillion a year. She argues that products causing significant harm, including injury, death or cybersecurity attacks, could be subject to strict liability, whether or not a company knew or should have known of the danger. This excerpt presents Brennan’s perspective; it does not include the full panel’s views. How would lawmakers define significant harm and apply strict liability to A.I. products?","question":"How would lawmakers define significant harm and apply strict liability to A.I. products?","claims":[{"text":"Kate Brennan leads the policy agenda on AI and corporate power at the AI Now Institute.","excerpt":"Kate Brennan, a former Google tech worker, leads the policy agenda on A.I. and corporate power at the AI Now Institute","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Brennan says AI companies’ spending on development creates pressure to deploy the technology broadly, including in public institutions and contracts where it may not be fit for purpose or secure.","excerpt":"they need to push this tech everywhere, into all of our public institutions and contracting, including in areas where A.I. is not fit for purpose, is not secure","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Brennan cites a Bain estimate that companies would need $6 trillion in annual revenue by 2031 to sustain capital expenditure of $1.5 trillion a year.","excerpt":"Bain estimates that by 2031, they will have to achieve $6 trillion of revenue annually to sustain their current level of capital expenditure, which is $1.5 trillion a year.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Brennan says products causing significant harm could be subject to strict liability, whether or not the company knew or should have known of the danger.","excerpt":"if your product causes significant harm, whether that’s injury to people, death, cybersecurity attacks, then you could be held strictly liable — meaning whether or not you knew or should have known the danger.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The evidence is an excerpt featuring Brennan; it does not include the full roundtable or other experts’ views.","The revenue and capital expenditure figures are attributed to Bain’s estimate, not presented as observed outcomes.","The excerpt does not specify how lawmakers would define significant harm or apply strict liability to AI products."],"mediaId":"cf0760bd527e9107a2340f3f1da79daff172350aea5491dae27935d9ed4a4ee1","correctionReason":null,"id":"834b8ce1dee4548971a963ce8e52f9bb7e982ddf6fa0a98cd5067c70b996b67c","publicationId":"224de0e2-a7cd-410e-879e-b8608223bf86","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","sourceTitle":"What Should the Rules for A.I. Companies Actually Be? We Asked the Experts. - AI Now Institute","publisher":"AI Now Institute","publishedAt":"2026-10-26T17:49:25+00:00","originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-26T17:49:25+00:00","precision":"instant","basis":"publisher_page"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-26T18:07:04.790Z","createdAt":"2026-10-29T15:18:04.453Z","historical":false,"entityIds":["ai-now"],"topicIds":["institutions-and-trust","power-and-infrastructure","work-and-agency"],"media":[{"id":"cf0760bd527e9107a2340f3f1da79daff172350aea5491dae27935d9ed4a4ee1","kind":"article","url":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","sourceUrl":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-10-29T15:17:19.501Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","checkedAt":"2026-10-29T17:26:35.165Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["useful_perspective"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"cf0760bd527e9107a2340f3f1da79daff172350aea5491dae27935d9ed4a4ee1","confidence":0.89,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"8938040be1431254b1c0d375b894163f288a73d42b32be02aa0d1434950114a6","decidedAt":"2026-10-29T15:17:21.203Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"50469c432545f7db9f96515cf0bf6a9e487571a7f127fe71030d5bf7737c5e83","observationId":"a8b0ea449089801c17160d868540452fb25a5720a21b4c43ae4bc674abe92101","retrievedAt":"2026-10-29T15:17:19.198Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"6a869681-9d2d-42bf-8bb2-197990da6142"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"021aafc8-45ef-4a23-8f3b-4bd109e994ef"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-10-29T15:18:04.453Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"AI Now Institute","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"AI Now Institute","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"AI Now Institute","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"article-jsonld","sourceUrl":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","locator":"document/html[1]/head[0]/script[51]@2096.@graph[0].author"},"assertionId":"89c5e971c05d98757bac22ad697b28033ee3195cfa18d84c939a54c01cd240d8:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-10-29T17:26:35.165Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"89c5e971c05d98757bac22ad697b28033ee3195cfa18d84c939a54c01cd240d8","sourceUrl":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","contentSha256":"7a69d54f68c9f938044ba9db21e31562732df631337d7121f18f8e545e417dbb","textHash":"50469c432545f7db9f96515cf0bf6a9e487571a7f127fe71030d5bf7737c5e83","observedAt":"2026-10-29T17:26:35.165Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":2,"returned":1,"complete":false,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","snapshotId":"89c5e971c05d98757bac22ad697b28033ee3195cfa18d84c939a54c01cd240d8","contentSha256":"7a69d54f68c9f938044ba9db21e31562732df631337d7121f18f8e545e417dbb","textHash":"50469c432545f7db9f96515cf0bf6a9e487571a7f127fe71030d5bf7737c5e83","observedAt":"2026-10-29T17:26:35.165Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":6,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/834b8ce1dee4548971a963ce8e52f9bb7e982ddf6fa0a98cd5067c70b996b67c/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/kate-brennan-argues-a-i-rules-should-focus-on-corporate-834b8ce1","formats":{"html":"/readings/kate-brennan-argues-a-i-rules-should-focus-on-corporate-834b8ce1","markdown":"/readings/kate-brennan-argues-a-i-rules-should-focus-on-corporate-834b8ce1.md","json":"/readings/kate-brennan-argues-a-i-rules-should-focus-on-corporate-834b8ce1.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[{"id":"term-capital-expenditure","name":"Capital expenditure","explanation":"Money a company spends on long-lasting assets such as buildings, chips and power equipment.","referenceUrl":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_expenditure"}],"entities":[{"id":"kate-brennan","name":"Kate Brennan","kind":"person","context":"Kate Brennan is an AI Now Institute researcher and coauthor of its 2025 report on power and policy in AI.","referenceUrls":["https://ainowinstitute.org/about","https://ainowinstitute.org/","https://ainowinstitute.org/publications/research/ai-now-2025-landscape-report"],"path":"/entities/kate-brennan","json":"/entities/kate-brennan.json","markdown":"/entities/kate-brennan.md"},{"id":"ai-now","name":"AI Now Institute","kind":"organization","context":"AI Now Institute studies the power and institutions shaping AI and advocates for public accountability.","referenceUrls":["https://ainowinstitute.org/"],"path":"/entities/ai-now","json":"/entities/ai-now.json","markdown":"/entities/ai-now.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"834b8ce1dee4548971a963ce8e52f9bb7e982ddf6fa0a98cd5067c70b996b67c","revision":"224de0e2-a7cd-410e-879e-b8608223bf86","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"Kate Brennan argues A.I. rules should focus on corporate negligence","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/kate-brennan-argues-a-i-rules-should-focus-on-corporate-834b8ce1"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","revision":"50469c432545f7db9f96515cf0bf6a9e487571a7f127fe71030d5bf7737c5e83","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"What Should the Rules for A.I. Companies Actually Be? We Asked the Experts. - AI Now Institute","url":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"834b8ce1dee4548971a963ce8e52f9bb7e982ddf6fa0a98cd5067c70b996b67c","title":"Kate Brennan argues A.I. rules should focus on corporate negligence","argument":"Kate Brennan, who leads the policy agenda on A.I. and corporate power at the AI Now Institute, argues that government should focus on corporate negligence and stop harmful products from entering the market. She says A.I. companies’ spending on technology creates pressure to deploy it broadly, including in public institutions and contracts where it may not be fit for purpose or secure. Brennan cites a Bain estimate that, by 2031, companies would need $6 trillion in annual revenue to sustain their current level of capital expenditure, which she says is $1.5 trillion a year. She argues that products causing significant harm, including injury, death or cybersecurity attacks, could be subject to strict liability, whether or not a company knew or should have known of the danger. This excerpt presents Brennan’s perspective; it does not include the full panel’s views. How would lawmakers define significant harm and apply strict liability to A.I. products?","topicIds":["institutions-and-trust","power-and-infrastructure","work-and-agency"],"domain":"work","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The evidence is an excerpt featuring Brennan; it does not include the full roundtable or other experts’ views. The revenue and capital expenditure figures are attributed to Bain’s estimate, not presented as observed outcomes. The excerpt does not specify how lawmakers would define significant harm or apply strict liability to AI products.","speaker":{"name":"AI Now Institute","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"What Should the Rules for A.I. Companies Actually Be? We Asked the Experts. - AI Now Institute","publisher":"AI Now Institute","format":"Article","url":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","publishedAt":"2026-10-26T17:49:25+00:00","dateBasis":"Date stated by the publisher."},"evidence":[{"text":"Kate Brennan leads the policy agenda on AI and corporate power at the AI Now Institute.","excerpt":"Kate Brennan, a former Google tech worker, leads the policy agenda on A.I. and corporate power at the AI Now Institute","url":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Brennan says AI companies’ spending on development creates pressure to deploy the technology broadly, including in public institutions and contracts where it may not be fit for purpose or secure.","excerpt":"they need to push this tech everywhere, into all of our public institutions and contracting, including in areas where A.I. is not fit for purpose, is not secure","url":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Brennan cites a Bain estimate that companies would need $6 trillion in annual revenue by 2031 to sustain capital expenditure of $1.5 trillion a year.","excerpt":"Bain estimates that by 2031, they will have to achieve $6 trillion of revenue annually to sustain their current level of capital expenditure, which is $1.5 trillion a year.","url":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Brennan says products causing significant harm could be subject to strict liability, whether or not the company knew or should have known of the danger.","excerpt":"if your product causes significant harm, whether that’s injury to people, death, cybersecurity attacks, then you could be held strictly liable — meaning whether or not you knew or should have known the danger.","url":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","checkedAt":"2026-10-29T17:26:35.165Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How would lawmakers define significant harm and apply strict liability to A.I. products?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Kate Brennan argues A.I. rules should focus on corporate negligence","summary":"Kate Brennan, who leads the policy agenda on A.I. and corporate power at the AI Now Institute, argues that government should focus on corporate negligence and stop harmful products from entering the market. She says A.I. companies’ spending on technology creates pressure to deploy it broadly, including in public institutions and contracts where it may not be fit for purpose or secure. Brennan cites a Bain estimate that, by 2031, companies would need $6 trillion in annual revenue to sustain their current level of capital expenditure, which she says is $1.5 trillion a year. She argues that products causing significant harm, including injury, death or cybersecurity attacks, could be subject to strict liability, whether or not a company knew or should have known of the danger. This excerpt presents Brennan’s perspective; it does not include the full panel’s views. How would lawmakers define significant harm and apply strict liability to A.I. products?","question":"How would lawmakers define significant harm and apply strict liability to A.I. products?","claims":[{"text":"Kate Brennan leads the policy agenda on AI and corporate power at the AI Now Institute.","excerpt":"Kate Brennan, a former Google tech worker, leads the policy agenda on A.I. and corporate power at the AI Now Institute","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Brennan says AI companies’ spending on development creates pressure to deploy the technology broadly, including in public institutions and contracts where it may not be fit for purpose or secure.","excerpt":"they need to push this tech everywhere, into all of our public institutions and contracting, including in areas where A.I. is not fit for purpose, is not secure","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Brennan cites a Bain estimate that companies would need $6 trillion in annual revenue by 2031 to sustain capital expenditure of $1.5 trillion a year.","excerpt":"Bain estimates that by 2031, they will have to achieve $6 trillion of revenue annually to sustain their current level of capital expenditure, which is $1.5 trillion a year.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Brennan says products causing significant harm could be subject to strict liability, whether or not the company knew or should have known of the danger.","excerpt":"if your product causes significant harm, whether that’s injury to people, death, cybersecurity attacks, then you could be held strictly liable — meaning whether or not you knew or should have known the danger.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The evidence is an excerpt featuring Brennan; it does not include the full roundtable or other experts’ views.","The revenue and capital expenditure figures are attributed to Bain’s estimate, not presented as observed outcomes.","The excerpt does not specify how lawmakers would define significant harm or apply strict liability to AI products."],"mediaId":"cf0760bd527e9107a2340f3f1da79daff172350aea5491dae27935d9ed4a4ee1","correctionReason":null,"id":"834b8ce1dee4548971a963ce8e52f9bb7e982ddf6fa0a98cd5067c70b996b67c","publicationId":"224de0e2-a7cd-410e-879e-b8608223bf86","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","sourceTitle":"What Should the Rules for A.I. Companies Actually Be? We Asked the Experts. - AI Now Institute","publisher":"AI Now Institute","publishedAt":"2026-10-26T17:49:25+00:00","originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-26T17:49:25+00:00","precision":"instant","basis":"publisher_page"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-26T18:07:04.790Z","createdAt":"2026-10-29T15:18:04.453Z","historical":false,"entityIds":["ai-now"],"topicIds":["institutions-and-trust","power-and-infrastructure","work-and-agency"],"media":[{"id":"cf0760bd527e9107a2340f3f1da79daff172350aea5491dae27935d9ed4a4ee1","kind":"article","url":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","sourceUrl":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-10-29T15:17:19.501Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","checkedAt":"2026-10-29T17:26:35.165Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["useful_perspective"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"cf0760bd527e9107a2340f3f1da79daff172350aea5491dae27935d9ed4a4ee1","confidence":0.89,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"8938040be1431254b1c0d375b894163f288a73d42b32be02aa0d1434950114a6","decidedAt":"2026-10-29T15:17:21.203Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"50469c432545f7db9f96515cf0bf6a9e487571a7f127fe71030d5bf7737c5e83","observationId":"a8b0ea449089801c17160d868540452fb25a5720a21b4c43ae4bc674abe92101","retrievedAt":"2026-10-29T15:17:19.198Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"6a869681-9d2d-42bf-8bb2-197990da6142"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"021aafc8-45ef-4a23-8f3b-4bd109e994ef"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-10-29T15:18:04.453Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"AI Now Institute","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"AI Now Institute","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"AI Now Institute","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"article-jsonld","sourceUrl":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","locator":"document/html[1]/head[0]/script[51]@2096.@graph[0].author"},"assertionId":"89c5e971c05d98757bac22ad697b28033ee3195cfa18d84c939a54c01cd240d8:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-10-29T17:26:35.165Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"89c5e971c05d98757bac22ad697b28033ee3195cfa18d84c939a54c01cd240d8","sourceUrl":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","contentSha256":"7a69d54f68c9f938044ba9db21e31562732df631337d7121f18f8e545e417dbb","textHash":"50469c432545f7db9f96515cf0bf6a9e487571a7f127fe71030d5bf7737c5e83","observedAt":"2026-10-29T17:26:35.165Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":2,"returned":1,"complete":false,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://ainowinstitute.org/news/what-should-the-rules-for-a-i-companies-actually-be-we-asked-the-experts","snapshotId":"89c5e971c05d98757bac22ad697b28033ee3195cfa18d84c939a54c01cd240d8","contentSha256":"7a69d54f68c9f938044ba9db21e31562732df631337d7121f18f8e545e417dbb","textHash":"50469c432545f7db9f96515cf0bf6a9e487571a7f127fe71030d5bf7737c5e83","observedAt":"2026-10-29T17:26:35.165Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":6,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/834b8ce1dee4548971a963ce8e52f9bb7e982ddf6fa0a98cd5067c70b996b67c/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"224de0e2-a7cd-410e-879e-b8608223bf86","verdict":"passed","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The views are correctly attributed to Kate Brennan, and her role at the AI Now Institute matches the source. The Bain figures are presented as a Bain estimate that Brennan cites, not as the publisher's or reviewer's own claim.","excerpt":"Kate Brennan, a former Google tech worker, leads the policy agenda on A.I. and corporate power at the AI Now Institute"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"pass","explanation":"The title, summary and question accurately reflect Brennan's argument: deployment pressure from spending, a focus on corporate negligence, and strict liability. Strict liability is explained in plain language, and the summary notes this is one panelist's view. The question follows from what the evidence leaves unresolved. Repeating the question at the end of the summary is a style matter only.","excerpt":"The issue here is corporate negligence. That should be the focus."},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The originalPublished value of 2026-10-26 comes from the publisher page and matches the feed entry. The draft adds no conflicting date claims. The evidence does not show an earlier first publication of this page.","excerpt":null},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"Each claim is directly supported by verbatim source text. The draft keeps the revenue and spending figures as a cited estimate and frames strict liability as something that could apply, preserving the source's conditional wording. It adds no unsupported benefits or costs.","excerpt":"then you could be held strictly liable — meaning whether or not you knew or should have known the danger"},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified direct link to the original AI Now Institute page. This is the most direct way for readers to reach the actual source.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-10-29T15:18:04.453Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}