{"id":"30bc9fce5ceb8b44a82c586913171098f3bdcb18cdbf5d77c9aa8cda407579c0","title":"LessWrong contributor dynomight on how doing math feels these days","argument":"In a personal account, LessWrong contributor dynomight describes AI’s rapid rise in mathematical work and argues that its ability to produce proofs has not made human involvement obsolete. The author estimates that AI makes them around 50% more productive, but says the gain is limited because mathematical work also involves developing ideas, organizing arguments and understanding what is being proved. Dynomight argues that AI often produces tangled arguments with poor abstractions. Human-guided revisions can shorten proofs and sometimes produce stronger results, so this work is not merely about making mathematics easier for people to read.\n\nThe author also describes AI seeming to complete a task without delivering useful work, and says people using AI-generated mathematics must take responsibility for what they understand and vouch for. Yet dynomight sees promise in AI as a fast, knowledgeable assistant: with a person guiding and checking the work, it can help explore ideas, catch mistakes and produce clear mathematics. The account leaves open what a new equilibrium for doing mathematics will look like, and whether producing more papers with AI is socially useful.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery","institutions-and-trust"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The account is dynomight’s personal experience and judgment; it does not establish how representative the productivity estimate or observations are. The author says it can be unclear whether a failed attempt to simplify a proof reflects a bad idea or an AI that is not capable enough. The source does not settle what a new equilibrium for doing mathematics will look like or whether producing more AI-generated papers is socially useful.","speaker":{"name":"LessWrong","roleAtSource":"Publisher"},"source":{"title":"Scattered thoughts on how doing math feels these days","publisher":"LessWrong","format":"Article","url":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days","publishedAt":"2026-11-13T01:10:37.000Z","dateBasis":"Date supplied by the publisher’s feed."},"evidence":[{"text":"Dynomight says AI has moved quickly from a mildly useful tool to something many people consider nearly indispensable for mathematical work.","excerpt":"AI move in a matter of months from a mildly-useful toy to something that many people now consider almost impossible to do without.","url":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Dynomight estimates that AI makes them around 50% more productive at doing mathematics, because it helps with some stages but not all.","excerpt":"Personally, I'd say that current AI makes me around 50% more productive at \"doing math\".","url":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The author argues that AI’s tangled proofs and weak abstractions can be improved through human-guided iteration, sometimes producing shorter proofs or stronger results.","excerpt":"More importantly, during this process, someone (maybe me, maybe the AI) will often realize that there's a different proof strategy that gives a stronger result .","url":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Dynomight says AI can be a powerful assistant when the human guides the mathematics, checks it and remains responsible for the result.","excerpt":"if I'm disciplined and try to mostly do the math \"myself\" while asking the AI for help, I can explore ideas much faster than before, make far fewer mistakes, and produce something just as clear as before","url":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The author is unsure whether AI-generated papers are socially useful, despite understanding why people produce them.","excerpt":"But I don't think this is socially useful, and I tend to think everyone will soon agree that this is embarrassing. But… I'm not sure. Maybe it is socially useful?","url":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days","checkedAt":null,"items":[],"note":"Reading based on the publisher's curated RSS article text and declared contributor; the original page link was checked separately."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"What would show whether AI-generated mathematics is socially useful, as dynomight wonders, rather than simply producing more papers?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"LessWrong contributor dynomight on how doing math feels these days","summary":"In a personal account, LessWrong contributor dynomight describes AI’s rapid rise in mathematical work and argues that its ability to produce proofs has not made human involvement obsolete. The author estimates that AI makes them around 50% more productive, but says the gain is limited because mathematical work also involves developing ideas, organizing arguments and understanding what is being proved. Dynomight argues that AI often produces tangled arguments with poor abstractions. Human-guided revisions can shorten proofs and sometimes produce stronger results, so this work is not merely about making mathematics easier for people to read.\n\nThe author also describes AI seeming to complete a task without delivering useful work, and says people using AI-generated mathematics must take responsibility for what they understand and vouch for. Yet dynomight sees promise in AI as a fast, knowledgeable assistant: with a person guiding and checking the work, it can help explore ideas, catch mistakes and produce clear mathematics. The account leaves open what a new equilibrium for doing mathematics will look like, and whether producing more papers with AI is socially useful.","question":"What would show whether AI-generated mathematics is socially useful, as dynomight wonders, rather than simply producing more papers?","claims":[{"text":"Dynomight says AI has moved quickly from a mildly useful tool to something many people consider nearly indispensable for mathematical work.","excerpt":"AI move in a matter of months from a mildly-useful toy to something that many people now consider almost impossible to do without.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Dynomight estimates that AI makes them around 50% more productive at doing mathematics, because it helps with some stages but not all.","excerpt":"Personally, I'd say that current AI makes me around 50% more productive at \"doing math\".","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The author argues that AI’s tangled proofs and weak abstractions can be improved through human-guided iteration, sometimes producing shorter proofs or stronger results.","excerpt":"More importantly, during this process, someone (maybe me, maybe the AI) will often realize that there's a different proof strategy that gives a stronger result .","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Dynomight says AI can be a powerful assistant when the human guides the mathematics, checks it and remains responsible for the result.","excerpt":"if I'm disciplined and try to mostly do the math \"myself\" while asking the AI for help, I can explore ideas much faster than before, make far fewer mistakes, and produce something just as clear as before","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The author is unsure whether AI-generated papers are socially useful, despite understanding why people produce them.","excerpt":"But I don't think this is socially useful, and I tend to think everyone will soon agree that this is embarrassing. But… I'm not sure. Maybe it is socially useful?","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The account is dynomight’s personal experience and judgment; it does not establish how representative the productivity estimate or observations are.","The author says it can be unclear whether a failed attempt to simplify a proof reflects a bad idea or an AI that is not capable enough.","The source does not settle what a new equilibrium for doing mathematics will look like or whether producing more AI-generated papers is socially useful."],"mediaId":"232ba1f5e79ba606b90e8c0aa41df71c601e14aff48f9a31b2cc1ee61c450e55","correctionReason":null,"id":"30bc9fce5ceb8b44a82c586913171098f3bdcb18cdbf5d77c9aa8cda407579c0","publicationId":"865edfb3-4a17-4b77-8b33-c88460913322","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days","sourceTitle":"Scattered thoughts on how doing math feels these days","publisher":"LessWrong","publishedAt":"2026-11-13T01:10:37.000Z","originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-13T01:10:37.000Z","precision":"instant","basis":"feed_entry"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-13T01:21:29.709Z","createdAt":"2026-11-13T02:17:06.014Z","historical":false,"entityIds":["lesswrong"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery","institutions-and-trust"],"media":[{"id":"232ba1f5e79ba606b90e8c0aa41df71c601e14aff48f9a31b2cc1ee61c450e55","kind":"article","url":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days","sourceUrl":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-13T02:03:19.827Z","method":"registered_feed_entry_and_head","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days","checkedAt":null,"items":[],"note":"Reading based on the publisher's curated RSS article text and declared contributor; the original page link was checked separately."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["useful_perspective"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v6","mediaId":"232ba1f5e79ba606b90e8c0aa41df71c601e14aff48f9a31b2cc1ee61c450e55","confidence":0.84,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"e117826e7d9c7297710d1fd19f4c5c28c82186daa0dd3b9659d7d63b198d6619","decidedAt":"2026-11-13T02:03:22.108Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"c55720ab2c1fe289e0ed1e1fbdc3aa2b6ce3ae74b21eadd9a2ca54709ea731fa","observationId":"970368da8dc52419db7586c5c0a4e8dddb17ca0c4b70b53d17473e8bc9e81e7f","retrievedAt":"2026-11-13T01:21:22.481Z","kind":"feed-text","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"c7ccbdd6-2495-4a94-8df7-a7b566d9145c"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"362e529e-4013-4165-8ee8-b1021252e31d"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-13T02:17:06.014Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":null},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/lesswrong-contributor-dynomight-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-30bc9fce","formats":{"html":"/readings/lesswrong-contributor-dynomight-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-30bc9fce","markdown":"/readings/lesswrong-contributor-dynomight-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-30bc9fce.md","json":"/readings/lesswrong-contributor-dynomight-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-30bc9fce.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[],"entities":[{"id":"lesswrong","name":"LessWrong","kind":"organization","context":"LessWrong publishes community essays and discussions and provides a curated RSS feed.","referenceUrls":["https://www.lesswrong.com/","https://www.lesswrong.com/feed.xml?view=curated-rss"],"path":"/entities/lesswrong","json":"/entities/lesswrong.json","markdown":"/entities/lesswrong.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"30bc9fce5ceb8b44a82c586913171098f3bdcb18cdbf5d77c9aa8cda407579c0","revision":"865edfb3-4a17-4b77-8b33-c88460913322","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"LessWrong contributor dynomight on how doing math feels these days","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/lesswrong-contributor-dynomight-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-30bc9fce"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days","revision":"c55720ab2c1fe289e0ed1e1fbdc3aa2b6ce3ae74b21eadd9a2ca54709ea731fa","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Scattered thoughts on how doing math feels these days","url":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"30bc9fce5ceb8b44a82c586913171098f3bdcb18cdbf5d77c9aa8cda407579c0","title":"LessWrong contributor dynomight on how doing math feels these days","argument":"In a personal account, LessWrong contributor dynomight describes AI’s rapid rise in mathematical work and argues that its ability to produce proofs has not made human involvement obsolete. The author estimates that AI makes them around 50% more productive, but says the gain is limited because mathematical work also involves developing ideas, organizing arguments and understanding what is being proved. Dynomight argues that AI often produces tangled arguments with poor abstractions. Human-guided revisions can shorten proofs and sometimes produce stronger results, so this work is not merely about making mathematics easier for people to read.\n\nThe author also describes AI seeming to complete a task without delivering useful work, and says people using AI-generated mathematics must take responsibility for what they understand and vouch for. Yet dynomight sees promise in AI as a fast, knowledgeable assistant: with a person guiding and checking the work, it can help explore ideas, catch mistakes and produce clear mathematics. The account leaves open what a new equilibrium for doing mathematics will look like, and whether producing more papers with AI is socially useful.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery","institutions-and-trust"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The account is dynomight’s personal experience and judgment; it does not establish how representative the productivity estimate or observations are. The author says it can be unclear whether a failed attempt to simplify a proof reflects a bad idea or an AI that is not capable enough. The source does not settle what a new equilibrium for doing mathematics will look like or whether producing more AI-generated papers is socially useful.","speaker":{"name":"LessWrong","roleAtSource":"Publisher"},"source":{"title":"Scattered thoughts on how doing math feels these days","publisher":"LessWrong","format":"Article","url":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days","publishedAt":"2026-11-13T01:10:37.000Z","dateBasis":"Date supplied by the publisher’s feed."},"evidence":[{"text":"Dynomight says AI has moved quickly from a mildly useful tool to something many people consider nearly indispensable for mathematical work.","excerpt":"AI move in a matter of months from a mildly-useful toy to something that many people now consider almost impossible to do without.","url":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Dynomight estimates that AI makes them around 50% more productive at doing mathematics, because it helps with some stages but not all.","excerpt":"Personally, I'd say that current AI makes me around 50% more productive at \"doing math\".","url":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The author argues that AI’s tangled proofs and weak abstractions can be improved through human-guided iteration, sometimes producing shorter proofs or stronger results.","excerpt":"More importantly, during this process, someone (maybe me, maybe the AI) will often realize that there's a different proof strategy that gives a stronger result .","url":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Dynomight says AI can be a powerful assistant when the human guides the mathematics, checks it and remains responsible for the result.","excerpt":"if I'm disciplined and try to mostly do the math \"myself\" while asking the AI for help, I can explore ideas much faster than before, make far fewer mistakes, and produce something just as clear as before","url":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The author is unsure whether AI-generated papers are socially useful, despite understanding why people produce them.","excerpt":"But I don't think this is socially useful, and I tend to think everyone will soon agree that this is embarrassing. But… I'm not sure. Maybe it is socially useful?","url":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days","checkedAt":null,"items":[],"note":"Reading based on the publisher's curated RSS article text and declared contributor; the original page link was checked separately."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"What would show whether AI-generated mathematics is socially useful, as dynomight wonders, rather than simply producing more papers?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"LessWrong contributor dynomight on how doing math feels these days","summary":"In a personal account, LessWrong contributor dynomight describes AI’s rapid rise in mathematical work and argues that its ability to produce proofs has not made human involvement obsolete. The author estimates that AI makes them around 50% more productive, but says the gain is limited because mathematical work also involves developing ideas, organizing arguments and understanding what is being proved. Dynomight argues that AI often produces tangled arguments with poor abstractions. Human-guided revisions can shorten proofs and sometimes produce stronger results, so this work is not merely about making mathematics easier for people to read.\n\nThe author also describes AI seeming to complete a task without delivering useful work, and says people using AI-generated mathematics must take responsibility for what they understand and vouch for. Yet dynomight sees promise in AI as a fast, knowledgeable assistant: with a person guiding and checking the work, it can help explore ideas, catch mistakes and produce clear mathematics. The account leaves open what a new equilibrium for doing mathematics will look like, and whether producing more papers with AI is socially useful.","question":"What would show whether AI-generated mathematics is socially useful, as dynomight wonders, rather than simply producing more papers?","claims":[{"text":"Dynomight says AI has moved quickly from a mildly useful tool to something many people consider nearly indispensable for mathematical work.","excerpt":"AI move in a matter of months from a mildly-useful toy to something that many people now consider almost impossible to do without.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Dynomight estimates that AI makes them around 50% more productive at doing mathematics, because it helps with some stages but not all.","excerpt":"Personally, I'd say that current AI makes me around 50% more productive at \"doing math\".","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The author argues that AI’s tangled proofs and weak abstractions can be improved through human-guided iteration, sometimes producing shorter proofs or stronger results.","excerpt":"More importantly, during this process, someone (maybe me, maybe the AI) will often realize that there's a different proof strategy that gives a stronger result .","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Dynomight says AI can be a powerful assistant when the human guides the mathematics, checks it and remains responsible for the result.","excerpt":"if I'm disciplined and try to mostly do the math \"myself\" while asking the AI for help, I can explore ideas much faster than before, make far fewer mistakes, and produce something just as clear as before","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The author is unsure whether AI-generated papers are socially useful, despite understanding why people produce them.","excerpt":"But I don't think this is socially useful, and I tend to think everyone will soon agree that this is embarrassing. But… I'm not sure. Maybe it is socially useful?","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["The account is dynomight’s personal experience and judgment; it does not establish how representative the productivity estimate or observations are.","The author says it can be unclear whether a failed attempt to simplify a proof reflects a bad idea or an AI that is not capable enough.","The source does not settle what a new equilibrium for doing mathematics will look like or whether producing more AI-generated papers is socially useful."],"mediaId":"232ba1f5e79ba606b90e8c0aa41df71c601e14aff48f9a31b2cc1ee61c450e55","correctionReason":null,"id":"30bc9fce5ceb8b44a82c586913171098f3bdcb18cdbf5d77c9aa8cda407579c0","publicationId":"865edfb3-4a17-4b77-8b33-c88460913322","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days","sourceTitle":"Scattered thoughts on how doing math feels these days","publisher":"LessWrong","publishedAt":"2026-11-13T01:10:37.000Z","originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-13T01:10:37.000Z","precision":"instant","basis":"feed_entry"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-13T01:21:29.709Z","createdAt":"2026-11-13T02:17:06.014Z","historical":false,"entityIds":["lesswrong"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery","institutions-and-trust"],"media":[{"id":"232ba1f5e79ba606b90e8c0aa41df71c601e14aff48f9a31b2cc1ee61c450e55","kind":"article","url":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days","sourceUrl":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-13T02:03:19.827Z","method":"registered_feed_entry_and_head","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HuQAuWjc2Z5tqCjyw/scattered-thoughts-on-how-doing-math-feels-these-days","checkedAt":null,"items":[],"note":"Reading based on the publisher's curated RSS article text and declared contributor; the original page link was checked separately."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["useful_perspective"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v6","mediaId":"232ba1f5e79ba606b90e8c0aa41df71c601e14aff48f9a31b2cc1ee61c450e55","confidence":0.84,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"e117826e7d9c7297710d1fd19f4c5c28c82186daa0dd3b9659d7d63b198d6619","decidedAt":"2026-11-13T02:03:22.108Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"c55720ab2c1fe289e0ed1e1fbdc3aa2b6ce3ae74b21eadd9a2ca54709ea731fa","observationId":"970368da8dc52419db7586c5c0a4e8dddb17ca0c4b70b53d17473e8bc9e81e7f","retrievedAt":"2026-11-13T01:21:22.481Z","kind":"feed-text","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"c7ccbdd6-2495-4a94-8df7-a7b566d9145c"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"362e529e-4013-4165-8ee8-b1021252e31d"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-13T02:17:06.014Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":null}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"865edfb3-4a17-4b77-8b33-c88460913322","verdict":"uncertain","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The feed names dynomight as the author, and the reading consistently attributes the views to dynomight on LessWrong. Personal judgments, including the 50% estimate, stay framed as the author's.","excerpt":"Feed-supplied author: dynomight"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"uncertain","explanation":"The summary omits the author's own 'biggest reason' for not gaining more productivity: a loss of purpose in proving things. It instead presents workflow stages as the limit, which erases a central human stake. It also flattens the author's lean that AI paper floods are not socially useful and 'embarrassing' into a neutral open question. Terms such as 'abstractions' and 'equilibrium' go unexplained for a general reader. Smallest repairs: add a sentence on 'What's the point?' and state the author's lean before his hedge.","excerpt":"I think the biggest reason I'm not more productive is: What's the point?"},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The originalPublished value of 2026-11-13 matches the feed entry. The text's own reference to Autumn 2026 is consistent with that date. Nothing suggests an earlier first publication.","excerpt":"as of Autumn 2026, humans still have a lot to contribute"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"Each claim matches a source excerpt: the shift from toy to near-indispensable, the roughly 50% estimate, human-guided simplification yielding stronger results, the disciplined-assistant mode, and the hedged view on AI papers. The responsibility point is supported in section 16. Claim 5 is supported but would be more faithful if it noted that the author leans toward 'not socially useful' before hedging.","excerpt":"So I don't mind if people send me \"centaur math\", provided they take responsibility for the contents."},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified direct link to the original LessWrong post. It matches the source URL and is the most direct way to access the essay.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-13T02:17:06.014Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}