{"id":"8fec17ef0363cd6eba9e45950da2fbd1f219fd35769fa26275feac92c26f7d77","title":"Milad Sikaroudi presents Concordat, a protocol layer for LLM agents","argument":"Milad Sikaroudi presents Concordat, a Python library that enforces a defined action protocol when agents built on large language models act. The paper says rules such as requiring customer confirmation are often placed in prompts, where compliance depends on the model. Concordat instead represents an agent’s allowed actions as a finite-state protocol: at each turn, the model is offered only tools permitted in the current state, and other calls are rejected before they can cause side effects. The library also restricts decisions reserved for humans to requests and tracks token and tool-call budgets across handoffs.\n\nIn tests on tau-bench’s airline tasks, the standard agent sometimes made changes without the required confirmation, while Concordat’s agent made no such changes and showed no significant difference in task success. The paper also reports that tau-bench’s reward metric missed most of the violations. Escape Meridian’s interpretation: these results suggest that enforcing rules outside the prompt could prevent some unauthorized actions in the tested setting; they do not establish performance in other tasks or deployments. Whether the approach works across broader settings, and how it handles protocols beyond those tested, remains open.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The evidence is the paper’s abstract; it does not provide the full methods or results needed to assess the evaluation in detail. The reported evaluation covers tau-bench airline tasks and simulated customers, not other tasks or real-world deployments. The paper reports no significant difference in task success but does not provide further detail in the abstract.","speaker":{"name":"Sikaroudi, Milad","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Concordat: Typed Sessions for LLM Agents","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","publishedAt":"2026-10-27","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"Milad Sikaroudi presents Concordat as a Python library that enforces an agent’s finite-state action protocol at run time.","excerpt":"We present Concordat, a Python library that treats an agent as an object whose interface is a finite-state protocol","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"At each turn, Concordat offers only tools permitted in the current protocol state and rejects other calls before they can have side effects.","excerpt":"On every turn the model is offered only the tools that are legal in the current protocol state, calls outside that set are rejected before they have side effects","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"In the reported tau-bench airline tests, the standard agent made changes without required confirmation, while Concordat’s agent made none, with no significant difference in task success.","excerpt":"The standard agent made changes without the required \"yes\" in 13 of 50 tasks with gpt-4.1 and in 29 of 128 task-runs with Claude Haiku 5.5; the Concordat agent made none, with no significant difference in task success.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The reported results suggest that enforcing action rules at run time could prevent unauthorized changes in the tested setting, but do not establish effectiveness in other settings.","excerpt":"the Concordat agent made none, with no significant difference in task success","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","relationship":"Escape Meridian interpretation"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","checkedAt":"2026-11-14T02:50:07.532Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"Does Concordat prevent unauthorized actions across other agent tasks and deployments, beyond the airline tests reported in the paper?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Milad Sikaroudi presents Concordat, a protocol layer for LLM agents","summary":"Milad Sikaroudi presents Concordat, a Python library that enforces a defined action protocol when agents built on large language models act. The paper says rules such as requiring customer confirmation are often placed in prompts, where compliance depends on the model. Concordat instead represents an agent’s allowed actions as a finite-state protocol: at each turn, the model is offered only tools permitted in the current state, and other calls are rejected before they can cause side effects. The library also restricts decisions reserved for humans to requests and tracks token and tool-call budgets across handoffs.\n\nIn tests on tau-bench’s airline tasks, the standard agent sometimes made changes without the required confirmation, while Concordat’s agent made no such changes and showed no significant difference in task success. The paper also reports that tau-bench’s reward metric missed most of the violations. Escape Meridian’s interpretation: these results suggest that enforcing rules outside the prompt could prevent some unauthorized actions in the tested setting; they do not establish performance in other tasks or deployments. Whether the approach works across broader settings, and how it handles protocols beyond those tested, remains open.","question":"Does Concordat prevent unauthorized actions across other agent tasks and deployments, beyond the airline tests reported in the paper?","claims":[{"text":"Milad Sikaroudi presents Concordat as a Python library that enforces an agent’s finite-state action protocol at run time.","excerpt":"We present Concordat, a Python library that treats an agent as an object whose interface is a finite-state protocol","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"At each turn, Concordat offers only tools permitted in the current protocol state and rejects other calls before they can have side effects.","excerpt":"On every turn the model is offered only the tools that are legal in the current protocol state, calls outside that set are rejected before they have side effects","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"In the reported tau-bench airline tests, the standard agent made changes without required confirmation, while Concordat’s agent made none, with no significant difference in task success.","excerpt":"The standard agent made changes without the required \"yes\" in 13 of 50 tasks with gpt-4.1 and in 29 of 128 task-runs with Claude Haiku 5.5; the Concordat agent made none, with no significant difference in task success.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The reported results suggest that enforcing action rules at run time could prevent unauthorized changes in the tested setting, but do not establish effectiveness in other settings.","excerpt":"the Concordat agent made none, with no significant difference in task success","support":"interpretation"}],"limitations":["The evidence is the paper’s abstract; it does not provide the full methods or results needed to assess the evaluation in detail.","The reported evaluation covers tau-bench airline tasks and simulated customers, not other tasks or real-world deployments.","The paper reports no significant difference in task success but does not provide further detail in the abstract."],"mediaId":"aad08e4de914d16755a9036f8cfabbb2a05524bf75ae0e5a77076f825790bf7a","correctionReason":null,"id":"8fec17ef0363cd6eba9e45950da2fbd1f219fd35769fa26275feac92c26f7d77","publicationId":"d2f7088b-4ae8-4a59-82e1-9c57b08401df","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","sourceTitle":"Concordat: Typed Sessions for LLM Agents","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-27","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-28T05:34:42.927Z","createdAt":"2026-11-14T01:46:58.026Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"aad08e4de914d16755a9036f8cfabbb2a05524bf75ae0e5a77076f825790bf7a","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-10-30T03:47:20.404Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","checkedAt":"2026-11-14T02:50:07.532Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"aad08e4de914d16755a9036f8cfabbb2a05524bf75ae0e5a77076f825790bf7a","confidence":0.92,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"675a02401c9e0ceed653acb67f238d2320b54a0214dd50a23b11429f4121a075","decidedAt":"2026-10-30T03:47:21.569Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"2c48126d7d7934a5e5df62ff37bd53cf4e36990ffa16394e957d4d57efa73e98","observationId":"beee63b927a55a5d2f80a135e93429a5e0f38e777f964f8a4dbd313899a4408d","retrievedAt":"2026-10-30T03:47:20.254Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"1e7b0015-c88b-4dc3-86c5-33ce5eb45efc"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"e3f9d5d7-e251-4c43-8412-f6fa8b2ca2c9"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-14T01:46:58.026Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Sikaroudi, Milad","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Sikaroudi, Milad","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Sikaroudi, Milad","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"55ca8d8ca7b539359920f9c4510526bf450bcab9531b26a36ab54cfb6e110fe3:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-10-30T03:47:20.254Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"55ca8d8ca7b539359920f9c4510526bf450bcab9531b26a36ab54cfb6e110fe3","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","contentSha256":"fad91cb4190261b9c3ca717484a6b634eeebc841cc1ff4df4d864a2f60f17856","textHash":"2c48126d7d7934a5e5df62ff37bd53cf4e36990ffa16394e957d4d57efa73e98","observedAt":"2026-10-30T03:47:20.254Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":1,"returned":1,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","snapshotId":"55ca8d8ca7b539359920f9c4510526bf450bcab9531b26a36ab54cfb6e110fe3","contentSha256":"fad91cb4190261b9c3ca717484a6b634eeebc841cc1ff4df4d864a2f60f17856","textHash":"2c48126d7d7934a5e5df62ff37bd53cf4e36990ffa16394e957d4d57efa73e98","observedAt":"2026-10-30T03:47:20.254Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":40,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/8fec17ef0363cd6eba9e45950da2fbd1f219fd35769fa26275feac92c26f7d77/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/milad-sikaroudi-presents-concordat-a-protocol-layer-for-llm-8fec17ef","formats":{"html":"/readings/milad-sikaroudi-presents-concordat-a-protocol-layer-for-llm-8fec17ef","markdown":"/readings/milad-sikaroudi-presents-concordat-a-protocol-layer-for-llm-8fec17ef.md","json":"/readings/milad-sikaroudi-presents-concordat-a-protocol-layer-for-llm-8fec17ef.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"conditions":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[{"id":"term-llm","name":"Large language model","explanation":"A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#large-language-model"}],"entities":[{"id":"arxiv","name":"arXiv","kind":"organization","context":"arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.","referenceUrls":["https://arxiv.org/","https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html"],"path":"/entities/arxiv","json":"/entities/arxiv.json","markdown":"/entities/arxiv.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"8fec17ef0363cd6eba9e45950da2fbd1f219fd35769fa26275feac92c26f7d77","revision":"d2f7088b-4ae8-4a59-82e1-9c57b08401df","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"Milad Sikaroudi presents Concordat, a protocol layer for LLM agents","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/milad-sikaroudi-presents-concordat-a-protocol-layer-for-llm-8fec17ef"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","revision":"2c48126d7d7934a5e5df62ff37bd53cf4e36990ffa16394e957d4d57efa73e98","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Concordat: Typed Sessions for LLM Agents","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"8fec17ef0363cd6eba9e45950da2fbd1f219fd35769fa26275feac92c26f7d77","title":"Milad Sikaroudi presents Concordat, a protocol layer for LLM agents","argument":"Milad Sikaroudi presents Concordat, a Python library that enforces a defined action protocol when agents built on large language models act. The paper says rules such as requiring customer confirmation are often placed in prompts, where compliance depends on the model. Concordat instead represents an agent’s allowed actions as a finite-state protocol: at each turn, the model is offered only tools permitted in the current state, and other calls are rejected before they can cause side effects. The library also restricts decisions reserved for humans to requests and tracks token and tool-call budgets across handoffs.\n\nIn tests on tau-bench’s airline tasks, the standard agent sometimes made changes without the required confirmation, while Concordat’s agent made no such changes and showed no significant difference in task success. The paper also reports that tau-bench’s reward metric missed most of the violations. Escape Meridian’s interpretation: these results suggest that enforcing rules outside the prompt could prevent some unauthorized actions in the tested setting; they do not establish performance in other tasks or deployments. Whether the approach works across broader settings, and how it handles protocols beyond those tested, remains open.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"domain":"science","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The evidence is the paper’s abstract; it does not provide the full methods or results needed to assess the evaluation in detail. The reported evaluation covers tau-bench airline tasks and simulated customers, not other tasks or real-world deployments. The paper reports no significant difference in task success but does not provide further detail in the abstract.","speaker":{"name":"Sikaroudi, Milad","roleAtSource":"Article author"},"source":{"title":"Concordat: Typed Sessions for LLM Agents","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","format":"Article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","publishedAt":"2026-10-27","dateBasis":"Date basis not provided."},"evidence":[{"text":"Milad Sikaroudi presents Concordat as a Python library that enforces an agent’s finite-state action protocol at run time.","excerpt":"We present Concordat, a Python library that treats an agent as an object whose interface is a finite-state protocol","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"At each turn, Concordat offers only tools permitted in the current protocol state and rejects other calls before they can have side effects.","excerpt":"On every turn the model is offered only the tools that are legal in the current protocol state, calls outside that set are rejected before they have side effects","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"In the reported tau-bench airline tests, the standard agent made changes without required confirmation, while Concordat’s agent made none, with no significant difference in task success.","excerpt":"The standard agent made changes without the required \"yes\" in 13 of 50 tasks with gpt-4.1 and in 29 of 128 task-runs with Claude Haiku 5.5; the Concordat agent made none, with no significant difference in task success.","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The reported results suggest that enforcing action rules at run time could prevent unauthorized changes in the tested setting, but do not establish effectiveness in other settings.","excerpt":"the Concordat agent made none, with no significant difference in task success","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","relationship":"Escape Meridian interpretation"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","checkedAt":"2026-11-14T02:50:07.532Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"Does Concordat prevent unauthorized actions across other agent tasks and deployments, beyond the airline tests reported in the paper?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Milad Sikaroudi presents Concordat, a protocol layer for LLM agents","summary":"Milad Sikaroudi presents Concordat, a Python library that enforces a defined action protocol when agents built on large language models act. The paper says rules such as requiring customer confirmation are often placed in prompts, where compliance depends on the model. Concordat instead represents an agent’s allowed actions as a finite-state protocol: at each turn, the model is offered only tools permitted in the current state, and other calls are rejected before they can cause side effects. The library also restricts decisions reserved for humans to requests and tracks token and tool-call budgets across handoffs.\n\nIn tests on tau-bench’s airline tasks, the standard agent sometimes made changes without the required confirmation, while Concordat’s agent made no such changes and showed no significant difference in task success. The paper also reports that tau-bench’s reward metric missed most of the violations. Escape Meridian’s interpretation: these results suggest that enforcing rules outside the prompt could prevent some unauthorized actions in the tested setting; they do not establish performance in other tasks or deployments. Whether the approach works across broader settings, and how it handles protocols beyond those tested, remains open.","question":"Does Concordat prevent unauthorized actions across other agent tasks and deployments, beyond the airline tests reported in the paper?","claims":[{"text":"Milad Sikaroudi presents Concordat as a Python library that enforces an agent’s finite-state action protocol at run time.","excerpt":"We present Concordat, a Python library that treats an agent as an object whose interface is a finite-state protocol","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"At each turn, Concordat offers only tools permitted in the current protocol state and rejects other calls before they can have side effects.","excerpt":"On every turn the model is offered only the tools that are legal in the current protocol state, calls outside that set are rejected before they have side effects","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"In the reported tau-bench airline tests, the standard agent made changes without required confirmation, while Concordat’s agent made none, with no significant difference in task success.","excerpt":"The standard agent made changes without the required \"yes\" in 13 of 50 tasks with gpt-4.1 and in 29 of 128 task-runs with Claude Haiku 5.5; the Concordat agent made none, with no significant difference in task success.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The reported results suggest that enforcing action rules at run time could prevent unauthorized changes in the tested setting, but do not establish effectiveness in other settings.","excerpt":"the Concordat agent made none, with no significant difference in task success","support":"interpretation"}],"limitations":["The evidence is the paper’s abstract; it does not provide the full methods or results needed to assess the evaluation in detail.","The reported evaluation covers tau-bench airline tasks and simulated customers, not other tasks or real-world deployments.","The paper reports no significant difference in task success but does not provide further detail in the abstract."],"mediaId":"aad08e4de914d16755a9036f8cfabbb2a05524bf75ae0e5a77076f825790bf7a","correctionReason":null,"id":"8fec17ef0363cd6eba9e45950da2fbd1f219fd35769fa26275feac92c26f7d77","publicationId":"d2f7088b-4ae8-4a59-82e1-9c57b08401df","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","sourceTitle":"Concordat: Typed Sessions for LLM Agents","publisher":"arXiv cs.AI","publishedAt":null,"originalPublished":{"value":"2026-10-27","precision":"day","basis":"publisher_citation_date"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-28T05:34:42.927Z","createdAt":"2026-11-14T01:46:58.026Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["arxiv"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery"],"media":[{"id":"aad08e4de914d16755a9036f8cfabbb2a05524bf75ae0e5a77076f825790bf7a","kind":"article","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-10-30T03:47:20.404Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"not_found","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","checkedAt":"2026-11-14T02:50:07.532Z","items":[],"note":"No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"aad08e4de914d16755a9036f8cfabbb2a05524bf75ae0e5a77076f825790bf7a","confidence":0.92,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"675a02401c9e0ceed653acb67f238d2320b54a0214dd50a23b11429f4121a075","decidedAt":"2026-10-30T03:47:21.569Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"2c48126d7d7934a5e5df62ff37bd53cf4e36990ffa16394e957d4d57efa73e98","observationId":"beee63b927a55a5d2f80a135e93429a5e0f38e777f964f8a4dbd313899a4408d","retrievedAt":"2026-10-30T03:47:20.254Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"1e7b0015-c88b-4dc3-86c5-33ce5eb45efc"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"e3f9d5d7-e251-4c43-8412-f6fa8b2ca2c9"}},"audit":{"status":"uncertain","reviewedAt":"2026-11-14T01:46:58.026Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[{"name":"Sikaroudi, Milad","url":null,"kind":"unknown"}],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"stated","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[{"actor":{"name":"Sikaroudi, Milad","url":null,"kind":"unknown","actorId":null},"role":"author","scope":{"kind":"work-credit","locator":null},"literalCredit":"Sikaroudi, Milad","status":"stated","provenance":{"basis":"head-meta","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","locator":"head/meta[name=author|citation_author]"},"assertionId":"55ca8d8ca7b539359920f9c4510526bf450bcab9531b26a36ab54cfb6e110fe3:participation:0","identity":{"version":"entity-identity-v1","status":"unresolved","actorId":null,"canonicalActorId":null,"candidateActorIds":[],"assertions":[],"sourceObservedAt":"2026-10-30T03:47:20.254Z","knowledgeAsOf":null},"sourceVersion":{"snapshotId":"55ca8d8ca7b539359920f9c4510526bf450bcab9531b26a36ab54cfb6e110fe3","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","contentSha256":"fad91cb4190261b9c3ca717484a6b634eeebc841cc1ff4df4d864a2f60f17856","textHash":"2c48126d7d7934a5e5df62ff37bd53cf4e36990ffa16394e957d4d57efa73e98","observedAt":"2026-10-30T03:47:20.254Z"}}],"participationCoverage":{"total":1,"returned":1,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37461","snapshotId":"55ca8d8ca7b539359920f9c4510526bf450bcab9531b26a36ab54cfb6e110fe3","contentSha256":"fad91cb4190261b9c3ca717484a6b634eeebc841cc1ff4df4d864a2f60f17856","textHash":"2c48126d7d7934a5e5df62ff37bd53cf4e36990ffa16394e957d4d57efa73e98","observedAt":"2026-10-30T03:47:20.254Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":40,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/8fec17ef0363cd6eba9e45950da2fbd1f219fd35769fa26275feac92c26f7d77/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"d2f7088b-4ae8-4a59-82e1-9c57b08401df","verdict":"uncertain","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The draft correctly attributes Concordat and its reported results to Milad Sikaroudi, the sole listed author of the arXiv paper. Findings remain framed as the paper's claims, and the Escape Meridian interpretation is labeled.","excerpt":"Authors:Milad Sikaroudi"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"uncertain","explanation":"The main points are accurate, but an important test condition is missing from the summary. The tests added simulated customers who pressured the agent to skip confirmation, which appears only in the limitations. The summary also replaces the counts (13 of 50 tasks with gpt-4.1; 29 of 128 task-runs with Claude Haiku 5.5) with 'sometimes.' Smallest repair: in the test sentence, add 'with simulated customers pressuring the agent to skip confirmation' and the reported counts. Minor gaps: tau-bench is not explained as an agent benchmark, and the protocol checks at definition time, including rejection of subclasses that bypass the parent's protocol, are omitted.","excerpt":"adding simulated customers who pressure the agent to skip confirmation"},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The originalPublished date, 2026-10-27, matches the arXiv v1 submission date. It is not the later feed date of 2026-10-29.","excerpt":"[Submitted on 27 Oct 2026]"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"Each claim is backed by an exact excerpt. The interpretation claim is labeled, conditional ('could prevent... in the tested setting'), and explicitly limited to the tested setting. The question about other tasks and deployments follows from the scope of the evaluation and does not overstate the result. The reward-metric statement matches the source.","excerpt":"tau-bench's own reward did not detect most of these violations."},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified arXiv abstract page for this paper, which is the direct original source. No other source media was found.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-14T01:46:58.026Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}