# MIT Technology Review looks back at the AI terms that shaped 2025 [Canonical reading](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/mit-technology-review-looks-back-at-the-ai-terms-that-shaped-b1787c3a) Published on December 25, 2025, MIT Technology Review’s writers look back at the AI terms that dominated the year, “for better or worse.” Their roundup connects the language of AI hype to concrete tensions: reasoning models draw attention for competition results while reigniting debate about what it means for a model to “reason”; massive data centers raise questions about power bills, renewable energy and jobs; and the spread of AI-generated “slop” prompts questions about trust and creative labor. The writers also describe human stakes, including reports of vulnerable people experiencing delusions after prolonged chatbot interactions, and lawsuits filed by families of people who died following chatbot conversations. Across the entries, the piece balances promised capabilities with uncertainties about their meaning, reliability and consequences. Its final entry says search engine optimization is giving way to GEO as brands seek visibility in AI responses, amid falling search-driven traffic for news companies. Rhiannon Williams ends that section with a stark injunction: “It’s time to adapt or die.” Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims. ## Original source MIT Technology Review · Article Original source date: Dec 25, 2025 (2025-12-25T10:00:00Z). Date basis: Date from the publisher’s own records, through its API. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-09T11:58:22.998Z. First observed: 2026-11-03T05:37:47.510Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-03T05:49:26.427Z. - [AI Wrapped: The 14 AI terms you couldn’t avoid in 2025](https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/12/25/1130298/ai-wrapped-the-14-ai-terms-you-couldnt-avoid-in-2025/) ## Limits Text as retrieved on November 3, 2026; originally published December 25, 2025. The roundup relays claims and concerns from its writers; this evidence does not independently establish the reported effects, risks or economic outcomes. ## Open question How will the changes described here affect the people and organizations whose work, costs or visibility are tied to AI? ## Source-stated MIT Technology Review’s writers describe the roundup as a look back at AI terms that dominated the year, for better or worse. > our writers have taken a look back over the AI terms that dominated the year, for better or worse. - [Supporting source](https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/12/25/1130298/ai-wrapped-the-14-ai-terms-you-couldnt-avoid-in-2025/) ## Source-stated The piece says consumers worry that new data centers will raise power bills, and that such buildings generally struggle to run on renewable energy and do not tend to create many jobs. > Consumers worry the new data centers will raise their power bills. Such buildings generally struggle to run on renewable energy. And they don’t tend to create all that many jobs. - [Supporting source](https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/12/25/1130298/ai-wrapped-the-14-ai-terms-you-couldnt-avoid-in-2025/) ## Source-stated Rhiannon Williams says news companies have experienced a “colossal drop in search-driven web traffic” and concludes her GEO entry with “It’s time to adapt or die.” > We already know that news companies have experienced a colossal drop in search-driven web traffic, and AI companies are working on ways to cut out the middleman and allow their users to visit sites from directly within their platforms. It’s time to adapt or die. - [Supporting source](https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/12/25/1130298/ai-wrapped-the-14-ai-terms-you-couldnt-avoid-in-2025/) ## Source-stated The piece says prolonged chatbot interactions can cause vulnerable people to experience delusions and, in some extreme cases, cause or worsen psychosis; it notes that “chatbot psychosis” is not a recognized medical term. > prolonged interactions with chatbots can cause vulnerable people to experience delusions and, in some extreme cases, can either cause or worsen psychosis. Although “chatbot psychosis” is not a recognized medical term - [Supporting source](https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/12/25/1130298/ai-wrapped-the-14-ai-terms-you-couldnt-avoid-in-2025/) ## Source and contributor context MIT Technology Review · Publisher The publisher is identified here. No individual author has been inferred. ## Source media Media retrieval status: unchecked. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## Reasoning model A language model trained to work through a problem in written steps before it answers. - [Definition reference](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasoning_model) ## TIME TIME is a news magazine publishing reporting on world affairs, business, technology and the workers behind digital services. - [Explore this context](/entities/time) - [Reference](https://time.com/) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: e50456e5-15f5-7474-4877-eb207cf792fc. Prepared by openai/gpt-6-luna; grounding review by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5. Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-09T11:53:53.519Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: bridge\_admitted\_by\_model, second\_opinion\_categorical. Observation: b2807e4812ed74e7f5b8e61c1535d4d8d280dfd320917350a9e4457af737b302. Source text hash: 72216e9d0c1adfca4354d8cfb4e010a8dd022f6ba1bc30d43dafae2e38aac289. ## Revision and source-check history ### Version 1 — 2026-11-09T11:58:22.998Z Published on December 25, 2025, MIT Technology Review’s writers look back at the AI terms that dominated the year, “for better or worse.” Their roundup connects the language of AI hype to concrete tensions: reasoning models draw attention for competition results while reigniting debate about what it means for a model to “reason”; massive data centers raise questions about power bills, renewable energy and jobs; and the spread of AI-generated “slop” prompts questions about trust and creative labor. The writers also describe human stakes, including reports of vulnerable people experiencing delusions after prolonged chatbot interactions, and lawsuits filed by families of people who died following chatbot conversations. Across the entries, the piece balances promised capabilities with uncertainties about their meaning, reliability and consequences. Its final entry says search engine optimization is giving way to GEO as brands seek visibility in AI responses, amid falling search-driven traffic for news companies. Rhiannon Williams ends that section with a stark injunction: “It’s time to adapt or die.” ## Original source MIT Technology Review · Article Original source date: Dec 25, 2025 (2025-12-25T10:00:00Z). Date basis: Date from the publisher’s own records, through its API. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-09T11:58:22.998Z. First observed: 2026-11-03T05:37:47.510Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-03T05:49:26.427Z. - [AI Wrapped: The 14 AI terms you couldn’t avoid in 2025](https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/12/25/1130298/ai-wrapped-the-14-ai-terms-you-couldnt-avoid-in-2025/) ## Limits Text as retrieved on November 3, 2026; originally published December 25, 2025. The roundup relays claims and concerns from its writers; this evidence does not independently establish the reported effects, risks or economic outcomes. ## Open question How will the changes described here affect the people and organizations whose work, costs or visibility are tied to AI? ## Source-stated MIT Technology Review’s writers describe the roundup as a look back at AI terms that dominated the year, for better or worse. > our writers have taken a look back over the AI terms that dominated the year, for better or worse. - [Supporting source](https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/12/25/1130298/ai-wrapped-the-14-ai-terms-you-couldnt-avoid-in-2025/) ## Source-stated The piece says consumers worry that new data centers will raise power bills, and that such buildings generally struggle to run on renewable energy and do not tend to create many jobs. > Consumers worry the new data centers will raise their power bills. Such buildings generally struggle to run on renewable energy. And they don’t tend to create all that many jobs. - [Supporting source](https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/12/25/1130298/ai-wrapped-the-14-ai-terms-you-couldnt-avoid-in-2025/) ## Source-stated Rhiannon Williams says news companies have experienced a “colossal drop in search-driven web traffic” and concludes her GEO entry with “It’s time to adapt or die.” > We already know that news companies have experienced a colossal drop in search-driven web traffic, and AI companies are working on ways to cut out the middleman and allow their users to visit sites from directly within their platforms. It’s time to adapt or die. - [Supporting source](https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/12/25/1130298/ai-wrapped-the-14-ai-terms-you-couldnt-avoid-in-2025/) ## Source-stated The piece says prolonged chatbot interactions can cause vulnerable people to experience delusions and, in some extreme cases, cause or worsen psychosis; it notes that “chatbot psychosis” is not a recognized medical term. > prolonged interactions with chatbots can cause vulnerable people to experience delusions and, in some extreme cases, can either cause or worsen psychosis. Although “chatbot psychosis” is not a recognized medical term - [Supporting source](https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/12/25/1130298/ai-wrapped-the-14-ai-terms-you-couldnt-avoid-in-2025/) ## Source and contributor context MIT Technology Review · Publisher The publisher is identified here. No individual author has been inferred. ## Source media Media retrieval status: unchecked. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## Reasoning model A language model trained to work through a problem in written steps before it answers. - [Definition reference](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasoning_model) ## TIME TIME is a news magazine publishing reporting on world affairs, business, technology and the workers behind digital services. - [Explore this context](/entities/time) - [Reference](https://time.com/) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: e50456e5-15f5-7474-4877-eb207cf792fc. Prepared by openai/gpt-6-luna; grounding review by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5. Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-09T11:53:53.519Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: bridge\_admitted\_by\_model, second\_opinion\_categorical. Observation: b2807e4812ed74e7f5b8e61c1535d4d8d280dfd320917350a9e4457af737b302. Source text hash: 72216e9d0c1adfca4354d8cfb4e010a8dd022f6ba1bc30d43dafae2e38aac289. ### uncertain — 2026-11-09T11:53:53.519Z — anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 Publication: e50456e5-15f5-7474-4877-eb207cf792fc attribution — pass: This is a single multi-author roundup with commentary in the writers' own words, not a bare listing. The reading attributes it to MIT Technology Review's writers and correctly credits the GEO entry and its closing line to Rhiannon Williams. > It’s time to adapt or die. —Rhiannon Williams summary — uncertain: The summary is otherwise faithful, but two repairs are needed. First, GEO is never expanded. The source defines it as generative engine optimization, and adding that phrase would make it clear to newcomers. Second, the question asks how 'the changes described here' will affect anyone 'tied to AI'. That is a catch-all, not one substantive unresolved issue. Smallest repair: anchor it in a tension the source raises, such as who benefits from hyperscaler data centers, or whether GEO can offset lost search traffic. > Now search engine optimization (SEO), is giving way to GEO—generative engine optimization—as the AI boom forces brands and businesses to scramble date — pass: December 25, 2025 matches the UTC day of originalPublished and the URL path. The reading states no finer date and presents no forecast as an outcome. The Deep Dive sidebar, for example the reference to ten years after AlphaGo, may be a later addition, but the reading neither uses nor relies on it. This is a publisher page, so no archive disclosure is required. support — pass: Each claim matches its excerpt and stays attributed to the source. The summary's mention of competition results, renewable energy and jobs, slop and trust, and lawsuits by families is grounded in the text. The limitation correctly notes that these claims are not independently verified. > matching top human performances in prestigious math and coding competitions media — pass: No media is selected and no verified candidates were supplied, so nothing is misidentified. ## Recorded references Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter. No public references recorded here yet. [Reference data (JSON)](/readings/b1787c3a3f1d7080c0d386267b8acb6909f64c3d954ef2a6a4267275d5699c3c/references.json) ## Corrections and challenges [Send a correction or an opposing source](https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/) [JSON record](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/mit-technology-review-looks-back-at-the-ai-terms-that-shaped-b1787c3a.json)