# Nader Meskin's arXiv paper: Koopman Greedy Spiking Control for Nonlinear Systems under Firing-Rate Limits

[Canonical reading](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/nader-meskin-s-arxiv-paper-koopman-greedy-spiking-control-for-50781a73)

Nader Meskin proposes extending greedy spiking control to nonlinear systems using Koopman operator theory. Neuromorphic controllers send fixed-amplitude spikes, with control conveyed by when they fire; the work addresses firing-rate limits that earlier Lyapunov-based greedy spiking controllers neglected. Meskin says observable dictionaries with a particular invariance property let spike-induced state translations be represented exactly in lifted coordinates, so firing decisions can be made by comparing quadratic Lyapunov functions there. The paper reports a proof of practical stability for a clocked, rate-limited controller and gives an explicit ultimate bound. It also describes a data-driven design: Koopman eigenfunctions are learned from unforced data, and a linear program sets the Lyapunov function weights. In an inverted pendulum application, the learned eigenfunctions recover system energy, and the controller achieves swing-up and stabilization from nearly all initial conditions despite severe actuation limits. The abstract does not establish how the method performs on other systems or specify the numerical ultimate bound.

Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.

## Original source

arXiv eess.SY · Article

Original source date: Oct 30, 2026 (2026-10-30).

Date basis: Date basis not provided.

Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-11T00:23:04.660Z. First observed: 2026-11-02T05:06:26.473Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-02T08:03:50.018Z.

- [Koopman Greedy Spiking Control for Nonlinear Systems under Firing-Rate Limits](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41530)

## Limits

The abstract describes an inverted pendulum application but does not specify performance on other systems. The abstract mentions an explicit ultimate bound but gives no numerical value. It also does not detail the conditions behind the reported inverted pendulum result.


## Open question

How does the controller perform on nonlinear systems beyond the inverted pendulum application described in the abstract?


## Source-stated

Meskin proposes extending greedy spiking control to nonlinear systems using Koopman operator theory, addressing firing-rate limits neglected by earlier controllers.

> We extend greedy spiking control to nonlinear systems using Koopman operator theory.

- [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41530)

## Source-stated

The paper says invariant observable dictionaries enable an exact linear representation of spike-induced state translations in lifted coordinates.

> spike-induced state translations admit an exact linear representation in lifted coordinates

- [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41530)

## Source-stated

The paper proves practical stability for a clocked, rate-limited controller and provides an explicit ultimate bound.

> We prove practical stability of a clocked, rate-limited controller with an explicit ultimate bound

- [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41530)

## Source-stated

For an inverted pendulum, the paper reports that learned eigenfunctions recover system energy and that the controller achieves swing-up and stabilization from nearly all initial conditions despite severe actuation limits.

> the proposed controller achieves swing-up and stabilization from nearly all initial conditions despite severe actuation limits.

- [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41530)

## Source and contributor context

Meskin, Nader · Article author

These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.


## Source media

No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.


## Terms and references

Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.


## arXiv

arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.

- [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv)
- [Reference](https://arxiv.org/)
- [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html)

## Editorial provenance

Version 1. Publication ID: f420950d-602a-413c-8368-cb635745fa63.

Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.

Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-11T00:23:04.660Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.

Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development.

Observation: 17a66f541e5d308744bd217132a3ebe5b9b4589d7dc776125ebc2c324f53bd0f. Source text hash: 0f1c6df478257b171c34220784268df2ce2e11fb5d58cd5c579370eaff805de7.


## Revision and source-check history

### Version 1 — 2026-11-11T00:23:04.660Z

Nader Meskin proposes extending greedy spiking control to nonlinear systems using Koopman operator theory. Neuromorphic controllers send fixed-amplitude spikes, with control conveyed by when they fire; the work addresses firing-rate limits that earlier Lyapunov-based greedy spiking controllers neglected. Meskin says observable dictionaries with a particular invariance property let spike-induced state translations be represented exactly in lifted coordinates, so firing decisions can be made by comparing quadratic Lyapunov functions there. The paper reports a proof of practical stability for a clocked, rate-limited controller and gives an explicit ultimate bound. It also describes a data-driven design: Koopman eigenfunctions are learned from unforced data, and a linear program sets the Lyapunov function weights. In an inverted pendulum application, the learned eigenfunctions recover system energy, and the controller achieves swing-up and stabilization from nearly all initial conditions despite severe actuation limits. The abstract does not establish how the method performs on other systems or specify the numerical ultimate bound.

## Original source

arXiv eess.SY · Article

Original source date: Oct 30, 2026 (2026-10-30).

Date basis: Date basis not provided.

Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-11T00:23:04.660Z. First observed: 2026-11-02T05:06:26.473Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-02T08:03:50.018Z.

- [Koopman Greedy Spiking Control for Nonlinear Systems under Firing-Rate Limits](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41530)

## Limits

The abstract describes an inverted pendulum application but does not specify performance on other systems. The abstract mentions an explicit ultimate bound but gives no numerical value. It also does not detail the conditions behind the reported inverted pendulum result.


## Open question

How does the controller perform on nonlinear systems beyond the inverted pendulum application described in the abstract?


## Source-stated

Meskin proposes extending greedy spiking control to nonlinear systems using Koopman operator theory, addressing firing-rate limits neglected by earlier controllers.

> We extend greedy spiking control to nonlinear systems using Koopman operator theory.

- [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41530)

## Source-stated

The paper says invariant observable dictionaries enable an exact linear representation of spike-induced state translations in lifted coordinates.

> spike-induced state translations admit an exact linear representation in lifted coordinates

- [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41530)

## Source-stated

The paper proves practical stability for a clocked, rate-limited controller and provides an explicit ultimate bound.

> We prove practical stability of a clocked, rate-limited controller with an explicit ultimate bound

- [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41530)

## Source-stated

For an inverted pendulum, the paper reports that learned eigenfunctions recover system energy and that the controller achieves swing-up and stabilization from nearly all initial conditions despite severe actuation limits.

> the proposed controller achieves swing-up and stabilization from nearly all initial conditions despite severe actuation limits.

- [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41530)

## Source and contributor context

Meskin, Nader · Article author

These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.


## Source media

No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.


## Terms and references

Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.


## arXiv

arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.

- [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv)
- [Reference](https://arxiv.org/)
- [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html)

## Editorial provenance

Version 1. Publication ID: f420950d-602a-413c-8368-cb635745fa63.

Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.

Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-11T00:23:04.660Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.

Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development.

Observation: 17a66f541e5d308744bd217132a3ebe5b9b4589d7dc776125ebc2c324f53bd0f. Source text hash: 0f1c6df478257b171c34220784268df2ce2e11fb5d58cd5c579370eaff805de7.


### uncertain — 2026-11-11T00:23:04.660Z — anthropic/claude-opus-5.5

Publication: f420950d-602a-413c-8368-cb635745fa63

attribution — pass: The reading correctly attributes the work to Nader Meskin, the sole listed author of the arXiv paper, and frames the findings as the paper's claims rather than established facts.

> Authors:Nader Meskin

summary — uncertain: The summary is faithful, but a non-specialist cannot follow its core. Koopman operator theory, lifted coordinates, Lyapunov functions, observable dictionaries, eigenfunctions, practical stability and ultimate bound are not explained, and no tooltips are indicated; tooltip additions are needed. 'A particular invariance property' replaces the source's stated condition. The reading also omits that the linear program enforces only a sampled relaxation of the control-Lyapunov condition. It never says why spiking or neuromorphic control matters; if the source gives no reason, the reading should say so. Smallest repair: restore both conditions and add plain-language term explanations.

> enforces a sampled relaxation of the rate-limited control-Lyapunov condition

date — pass: originalPublished is 2026-10-30, which matches the arXiv v1 submission date. The feed date of 2026-11-02 is correctly not used.

> \[Submitted on 30 Oct 2026\]

support — pass: Each claim is tied to the abstract and correctly labeled source-stated. The limitations are accurate: there is no numeric bound, results are reported only for the pendulum, and the conditions are unspecified. The question follows from the evidence. The reading invents no benefits or stakeholders.

> the learned eigenfunctions recover the system energy, and the proposed controller achieves swing-up and stabilization from nearly all initial conditions despite severe actuation limits

media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct link to the original arXiv abstract page, which is the most direct way to access the source.

## Recorded references

Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter.

No public references recorded here yet.

[Reference data (JSON)](/readings/50781a737dd75e1a12722956489dcc210d8e3348943e7190143f8c63ec57eacb/references.json)

## Corrections and challenges

[Send a correction or an opposing source](https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/)

[JSON record](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/nader-meskin-s-arxiv-paper-koopman-greedy-spiking-control-for-50781a73.json)
