{"id":"a3b390541de94c130f561e678d6add9a442bd2ad99525c07e8ea8d4306a0f697","title":"Palette: teaching a small model to build decks in your design language","argument":"Praveen Venkateswaran, Anupama Murthi and Hamid Adebayo of IBM Research describe Palette, a 20B open-weight model for generating slide decks in IBM Design Language. Their approach separates planning from drawing: a designer role makes a structured brief, then a coder role writes code for each slide. The authors say this lets the slide-coding work run in parallel and makes the brief editable.\n\nThey trained the model on roughly 1,000 synthetic decks, with reasoning traces and examples repaired by a checker. A harness renders slides, checks for overlap and overflow, and keeps a repair only when the checker confirms improvement. In the authors’ PresentBench evaluation, Palette ranked first in Economics and Education, third in Talk, and second across the three domains. The authors note that PresentBench does not measure adherence to a specific design language, and that they know of no benchmark that does.\n\nThe authors present Palette as a way to retain control over design and keep confidential content within an organization’s infrastructure. Their results address deck quality on the reported benchmark, not whether a model reliably follows a company’s design language. How well Palette reproduces other organizations’ templates remains unmeasured; the authors say they are exploring re-skinning from existing .pptx files without retraining.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery","work-and-agency"],"domain":"work","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The evaluation covers three PresentBench domains and uses plans drafted by a separate frontier model from source documents; it does not measure adherence to a specific design language. The source reports that re-skinning output from existing .pptx files without retraining is being explored, not demonstrated.","speaker":{"name":"Hugging Face","roleAtSource":"Publisher"},"source":{"title":"Palette: teaching a small model to build decks in your design language","publisher":"Hugging Face","format":"Article","url":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","publishedAt":"2026-11-03T16:35:36.000Z","dateBasis":"Date supplied by the publisher’s feed."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors describe Palette as a 20B open-weight model trained to build decks following IBM Design Language.","excerpt":"We fine-tuned a 20B model to build decks the way people do: a designer plans the deck and a coder draws each slide. Its training data follows the IBM Design Language","url":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Palette divides deck creation between a designer role that creates a structured brief and a coder role that generates slide code; slide coding can run in parallel.","excerpt":"The designer reads the plan and writes a structured JSON brief: the palette, the type system, and for each slide its layout, its exact content and a short design rationale.","url":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors generated roughly 1,000 decks, with reasoning traces, then rendered and checked examples and repaired broken slides.","excerpt":"We generated around 1000 decks covering roughly 10,000 slides.\nEvery example also carries the reasoning behind it, written as a counterfactual","url":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"In the authors’ PresentBench evaluation, Palette ranked first on Economics and Education, third on Talk, and second across the three domains.","excerpt":"Across the three domains it places second, 1.1 points behind NotebookLM (59.7 vs 60.8) and ahead of the rest of the field, as a single 20B open-weight model.","url":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say PresentBench does not measure adherence to a specific design language and that they know of no benchmark that does.","excerpt":"PresentBench measures whether a deck is good, but not whether it follows a specific design language. We're not aware of a benchmark that does","url":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The reported evaluation does not establish how well Palette follows design languages beyond the one used in its training data.","excerpt":"PresentBench measures whether a deck is good, but not whether it follows a specific design language.","url":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","relationship":"Escape Meridian interpretation"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"found","sourceUrl":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T19:32:12.680Z","items":[],"note":"Media was declared by the source, but no asset passed the supported availability checks. Open the original source to view it."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How well does Palette reproduce an organization’s design language, given that PresentBench does not measure this and the authors report no benchmark that does?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Palette: teaching a small model to build decks in your design language","summary":"Praveen Venkateswaran, Anupama Murthi and Hamid Adebayo of IBM Research describe Palette, a 20B open-weight model for generating slide decks in IBM Design Language. Their approach separates planning from drawing: a designer role makes a structured brief, then a coder role writes code for each slide. The authors say this lets the slide-coding work run in parallel and makes the brief editable.\n\nThey trained the model on roughly 1,000 synthetic decks, with reasoning traces and examples repaired by a checker. A harness renders slides, checks for overlap and overflow, and keeps a repair only when the checker confirms improvement. In the authors’ PresentBench evaluation, Palette ranked first in Economics and Education, third in Talk, and second across the three domains. The authors note that PresentBench does not measure adherence to a specific design language, and that they know of no benchmark that does.\n\nThe authors present Palette as a way to retain control over design and keep confidential content within an organization’s infrastructure. Their results address deck quality on the reported benchmark, not whether a model reliably follows a company’s design language. How well Palette reproduces other organizations’ templates remains unmeasured; the authors say they are exploring re-skinning from existing .pptx files without retraining.","question":"How well does Palette reproduce an organization’s design language, given that PresentBench does not measure this and the authors report no benchmark that does?","claims":[{"text":"The authors describe Palette as a 20B open-weight model trained to build decks following IBM Design Language.","excerpt":"We fine-tuned a 20B model to build decks the way people do: a designer plans the deck and a coder draws each slide. Its training data follows the IBM Design Language","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Palette divides deck creation between a designer role that creates a structured brief and a coder role that generates slide code; slide coding can run in parallel.","excerpt":"The designer reads the plan and writes a structured JSON brief: the palette, the type system, and for each slide its layout, its exact content and a short design rationale.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors generated roughly 1,000 decks, with reasoning traces, then rendered and checked examples and repaired broken slides.","excerpt":"We generated around 1000 decks covering roughly 10,000 slides.\nEvery example also carries the reasoning behind it, written as a counterfactual","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"In the authors’ PresentBench evaluation, Palette ranked first on Economics and Education, third on Talk, and second across the three domains.","excerpt":"Across the three domains it places second, 1.1 points behind NotebookLM (59.7 vs 60.8) and ahead of the rest of the field, as a single 20B open-weight model.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say PresentBench does not measure adherence to a specific design language and that they know of no benchmark that does.","excerpt":"PresentBench measures whether a deck is good, but not whether it follows a specific design language. We're not aware of a benchmark that does","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The reported evaluation does not establish how well Palette follows design languages beyond the one used in its training data.","excerpt":"PresentBench measures whether a deck is good, but not whether it follows a specific design language.","support":"interpretation"}],"limitations":["The evaluation covers three PresentBench domains and uses plans drafted by a separate frontier model from source documents; it does not measure adherence to a specific design language.","The source reports that re-skinning output from existing .pptx files without retraining is being explored, not demonstrated."],"mediaId":"4d3938441f216409a8f1b94cf7b0fdb4871145e54a0ab57799f0fbd11992bc85","correctionReason":null,"id":"a3b390541de94c130f561e678d6add9a442bd2ad99525c07e8ea8d4306a0f697","publicationId":"8c5da76e-881d-4fab-8514-80844c95ca77","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","sourceTitle":"Palette: teaching a small model to build decks in your design language","publisher":"Hugging Face","publishedAt":"2026-11-03T16:35:36.000Z","originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-03T16:35:36.000Z","precision":"instant","basis":"feed_entry"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-03T16:36:22.857Z","createdAt":"2026-11-10T19:01:53.712Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["hugging-face"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery","work-and-agency"],"media":[{"id":"4d3938441f216409a8f1b94cf7b0fdb4871145e54a0ab57799f0fbd11992bc85","kind":"article","url":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","sourceUrl":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-03T16:46:00.269Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"found","sourceUrl":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T19:32:12.680Z","items":[],"note":"Media was declared by the source, but no asset passed the supported availability checks. Open the original source to view it."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"4d3938441f216409a8f1b94cf7b0fdb4871145e54a0ab57799f0fbd11992bc85","confidence":0.97,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"2675f47d9f2dcbac8fa75d953c9f1b6dc4c299356d7fe7e99903b2e965b68220","decidedAt":"2026-11-03T16:46:01.203Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"3df5015e8c967830c0d784ccddb2e68799454375c945f40724711fa0c8657305","observationId":"b642a1c7068b0aca1f2e14ff2b1b4ce62d0ed606ec486208756218d81bd1db97","retrievedAt":"2026-11-03T16:46:00.087Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"server-excerpt-repair/stream-excerpt-repair-v1 (original draft: gpt-6-luna)","runId":"b1f178b8-423f-4b28-8ddd-c16c40c3b34a"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"46764ea9-b45d-4465-8607-5baa5be1f6bb"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-11-10T19:01:53.712Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"missing","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[],"participationCoverage":{"total":0,"returned":0,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","snapshotId":"a1776dd01b9f4de0fe38f02d004b2d8cdc78267e912102013a299f458ca1a04c","contentSha256":"e95ad94c110f58cdc3d00ec5ef46160bde640af2ebefbb4e9dc8230309881abe","textHash":"3df5015e8c967830c0d784ccddb2e68799454375c945f40724711fa0c8657305","observedAt":"2026-11-03T16:46:00.087Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":38,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/a3b390541de94c130f561e678d6add9a442bd2ad99525c07e8ea8d4306a0f697/source"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/palette-teaching-a-small-model-to-build-decks-in-your-design-a3b39054","formats":{"html":"/readings/palette-teaching-a-small-model-to-build-decks-in-your-design-a3b39054","markdown":"/readings/palette-teaching-a-small-model-to-build-decks-in-your-design-a3b39054.md","json":"/readings/palette-teaching-a-small-model-to-build-decks-in-your-design-a3b39054.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[{"id":"term-open-weights","name":"Open weights","explanation":"A model whose trained numbers are published so others can download, run and inspect it; the license and training data may still be restricted.","referenceUrl":"https://opensource.org/ai/open-weights"},{"id":"term-chain-of-thought","name":"Chain of thought","explanation":"The step-by-step working a model writes out before giving its final answer.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#chain-of-thought-prompting"},{"id":"term-benchmark","name":"Benchmark","explanation":"A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.","referenceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09110"},{"id":"term-frontier-model","name":"Frontier model","explanation":"One of the most capable AI models available at a given time; the set shifts as models improve.","referenceUrl":"https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/frontier-ai-capabilities-and-risks-discussion-paper"}],"entities":[{"id":"hugging-face","name":"Hugging Face","kind":"organization","context":"Hugging Face hosts models, datasets and software that let people share, adapt and inspect AI systems.","referenceUrls":["https://huggingface.co/blog"],"path":"/entities/hugging-face","json":"/entities/hugging-face.json","markdown":"/entities/hugging-face.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"a3b390541de94c130f561e678d6add9a442bd2ad99525c07e8ea8d4306a0f697","revision":"8c5da76e-881d-4fab-8514-80844c95ca77","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"Palette: teaching a small model to build decks in your design language","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/palette-teaching-a-small-model-to-build-decks-in-your-design-a3b39054"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","revision":"3df5015e8c967830c0d784ccddb2e68799454375c945f40724711fa0c8657305","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Palette: teaching a small model to build decks in your design language","url":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"a3b390541de94c130f561e678d6add9a442bd2ad99525c07e8ea8d4306a0f697","title":"Palette: teaching a small model to build decks in your design language","argument":"Praveen Venkateswaran, Anupama Murthi and Hamid Adebayo of IBM Research describe Palette, a 20B open-weight model for generating slide decks in IBM Design Language. Their approach separates planning from drawing: a designer role makes a structured brief, then a coder role writes code for each slide. The authors say this lets the slide-coding work run in parallel and makes the brief editable.\n\nThey trained the model on roughly 1,000 synthetic decks, with reasoning traces and examples repaired by a checker. A harness renders slides, checks for overlap and overflow, and keeps a repair only when the checker confirms improvement. In the authors’ PresentBench evaluation, Palette ranked first in Economics and Education, third in Talk, and second across the three domains. The authors note that PresentBench does not measure adherence to a specific design language, and that they know of no benchmark that does.\n\nThe authors present Palette as a way to retain control over design and keep confidential content within an organization’s infrastructure. Their results address deck quality on the reported benchmark, not whether a model reliably follows a company’s design language. How well Palette reproduces other organizations’ templates remains unmeasured; the authors say they are exploring re-skinning from existing .pptx files without retraining.","topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery","work-and-agency"],"domain":"work","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"The evaluation covers three PresentBench domains and uses plans drafted by a separate frontier model from source documents; it does not measure adherence to a specific design language. The source reports that re-skinning output from existing .pptx files without retraining is being explored, not demonstrated.","speaker":{"name":"Hugging Face","roleAtSource":"Publisher"},"source":{"title":"Palette: teaching a small model to build decks in your design language","publisher":"Hugging Face","format":"Article","url":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","publishedAt":"2026-11-03T16:35:36.000Z","dateBasis":"Date supplied by the publisher’s feed."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors describe Palette as a 20B open-weight model trained to build decks following IBM Design Language.","excerpt":"We fine-tuned a 20B model to build decks the way people do: a designer plans the deck and a coder draws each slide. Its training data follows the IBM Design Language","url":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Palette divides deck creation between a designer role that creates a structured brief and a coder role that generates slide code; slide coding can run in parallel.","excerpt":"The designer reads the plan and writes a structured JSON brief: the palette, the type system, and for each slide its layout, its exact content and a short design rationale.","url":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors generated roughly 1,000 decks, with reasoning traces, then rendered and checked examples and repaired broken slides.","excerpt":"We generated around 1000 decks covering roughly 10,000 slides.\nEvery example also carries the reasoning behind it, written as a counterfactual","url":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"In the authors’ PresentBench evaluation, Palette ranked first on Economics and Education, third on Talk, and second across the three domains.","excerpt":"Across the three domains it places second, 1.1 points behind NotebookLM (59.7 vs 60.8) and ahead of the rest of the field, as a single 20B open-weight model.","url":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say PresentBench does not measure adherence to a specific design language and that they know of no benchmark that does.","excerpt":"PresentBench measures whether a deck is good, but not whether it follows a specific design language. We're not aware of a benchmark that does","url":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The reported evaluation does not establish how well Palette follows design languages beyond the one used in its training data.","excerpt":"PresentBench measures whether a deck is good, but not whether it follows a specific design language.","url":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","relationship":"Escape Meridian interpretation"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"found","sourceUrl":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T19:32:12.680Z","items":[],"note":"Media was declared by the source, but no asset passed the supported availability checks. Open the original source to view it."},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How well does Palette reproduce an organization’s design language, given that PresentBench does not measure this and the authors report no benchmark that does?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Palette: teaching a small model to build decks in your design language","summary":"Praveen Venkateswaran, Anupama Murthi and Hamid Adebayo of IBM Research describe Palette, a 20B open-weight model for generating slide decks in IBM Design Language. Their approach separates planning from drawing: a designer role makes a structured brief, then a coder role writes code for each slide. The authors say this lets the slide-coding work run in parallel and makes the brief editable.\n\nThey trained the model on roughly 1,000 synthetic decks, with reasoning traces and examples repaired by a checker. A harness renders slides, checks for overlap and overflow, and keeps a repair only when the checker confirms improvement. In the authors’ PresentBench evaluation, Palette ranked first in Economics and Education, third in Talk, and second across the three domains. The authors note that PresentBench does not measure adherence to a specific design language, and that they know of no benchmark that does.\n\nThe authors present Palette as a way to retain control over design and keep confidential content within an organization’s infrastructure. Their results address deck quality on the reported benchmark, not whether a model reliably follows a company’s design language. How well Palette reproduces other organizations’ templates remains unmeasured; the authors say they are exploring re-skinning from existing .pptx files without retraining.","question":"How well does Palette reproduce an organization’s design language, given that PresentBench does not measure this and the authors report no benchmark that does?","claims":[{"text":"The authors describe Palette as a 20B open-weight model trained to build decks following IBM Design Language.","excerpt":"We fine-tuned a 20B model to build decks the way people do: a designer plans the deck and a coder draws each slide. Its training data follows the IBM Design Language","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Palette divides deck creation between a designer role that creates a structured brief and a coder role that generates slide code; slide coding can run in parallel.","excerpt":"The designer reads the plan and writes a structured JSON brief: the palette, the type system, and for each slide its layout, its exact content and a short design rationale.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors generated roughly 1,000 decks, with reasoning traces, then rendered and checked examples and repaired broken slides.","excerpt":"We generated around 1000 decks covering roughly 10,000 slides.\nEvery example also carries the reasoning behind it, written as a counterfactual","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"In the authors’ PresentBench evaluation, Palette ranked first on Economics and Education, third on Talk, and second across the three domains.","excerpt":"Across the three domains it places second, 1.1 points behind NotebookLM (59.7 vs 60.8) and ahead of the rest of the field, as a single 20B open-weight model.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say PresentBench does not measure adherence to a specific design language and that they know of no benchmark that does.","excerpt":"PresentBench measures whether a deck is good, but not whether it follows a specific design language. We're not aware of a benchmark that does","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The reported evaluation does not establish how well Palette follows design languages beyond the one used in its training data.","excerpt":"PresentBench measures whether a deck is good, but not whether it follows a specific design language.","support":"interpretation"}],"limitations":["The evaluation covers three PresentBench domains and uses plans drafted by a separate frontier model from source documents; it does not measure adherence to a specific design language.","The source reports that re-skinning output from existing .pptx files without retraining is being explored, not demonstrated."],"mediaId":"4d3938441f216409a8f1b94cf7b0fdb4871145e54a0ab57799f0fbd11992bc85","correctionReason":null,"id":"a3b390541de94c130f561e678d6add9a442bd2ad99525c07e8ea8d4306a0f697","publicationId":"8c5da76e-881d-4fab-8514-80844c95ca77","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","sourceTitle":"Palette: teaching a small model to build decks in your design language","publisher":"Hugging Face","publishedAt":"2026-11-03T16:35:36.000Z","originalPublished":{"value":"2026-11-03T16:35:36.000Z","precision":"instant","basis":"feed_entry"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-03T16:36:22.857Z","createdAt":"2026-11-10T19:01:53.712Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["hugging-face"],"topicIds":["intelligence-and-discovery","work-and-agency"],"media":[{"id":"4d3938441f216409a8f1b94cf7b0fdb4871145e54a0ab57799f0fbd11992bc85","kind":"article","url":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","sourceUrl":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","label":"Read original","provenance":"source_link","verification":{"status":"verified","checkedAt":"2026-11-03T16:46:00.269Z","method":"acquired_source","contentType":"text/html"},"recommendationReason":"Recommended by Jev for understanding this source; checked by Luna."}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"found","sourceUrl":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","checkedAt":"2026-11-10T19:32:12.680Z","items":[],"note":"Media was declared by the source, but no asset passed the supported availability checks. Open the original source to view it."},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","reasonCodes":["material_development"],"rubricVersion":"stream-admission-v5","mediaId":"4d3938441f216409a8f1b94cf7b0fdb4871145e54a0ab57799f0fbd11992bc85","confidence":0.97,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","inputHash":"2675f47d9f2dcbac8fa75d953c9f1b6dc4c299356d7fe7e99903b2e965b68220","decidedAt":"2026-11-03T16:46:01.203Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"3df5015e8c967830c0d784ccddb2e68799454375c945f40724711fa0c8657305","observationId":"b642a1c7068b0aca1f2e14ff2b1b4ce62d0ed606ec486208756218d81bd1db97","retrievedAt":"2026-11-03T16:46:00.087Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"server-excerpt-repair/stream-excerpt-repair-v1 (original draft: gpt-6-luna)","runId":"b1f178b8-423f-4b28-8ddd-c16c40c3b34a"},"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6-luna","runId":"46764ea9-b45d-4465-8607-5baa5be1f6bb"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-11-10T19:01:53.712Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"},"sourceAttribution":{"authors":[],"authorRole":"article-author","hosts":[],"status":"missing","authorRoster":{"truncated":false,"omitted":0,"assertionGroupsOmitted":0},"participation":[],"participationCoverage":{"total":0,"returned":0,"complete":true,"fullAssertions":"source-metadata-endpoint"},"distribution":null,"publisher":null,"sourceUrl":"https://huggingface.co/blog/ibm-research/palette-deck-building","snapshotId":"a1776dd01b9f4de0fe38f02d004b2d8cdc78267e912102013a299f458ca1a04c","contentSha256":"e95ad94c110f58cdc3d00ec5ef46160bde640af2ebefbb4e9dc8230309881abe","textHash":"3df5015e8c967830c0d784ccddb2e68799454375c945f40724711fa0c8657305","observedAt":"2026-11-03T16:46:00.087Z","basis":"publisher-page-metadata","sourceLinks":38,"linksTruncated":false,"metadataUrl":"/api/pipeline/stream/a3b390541de94c130f561e678d6add9a442bd2ad99525c07e8ea8d4306a0f697/source"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"8c5da76e-881d-4fab-8514-80844c95ca77","verdict":"passed","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The reading correctly attributes Palette and its claims to Praveen Venkateswaran, Anupama Murthi and Hamid Adebayo of IBM Research, who are listed as the authors of this Hugging Face post. Performance claims are kept as the authors' own reported results.","excerpt":"Praveen Venkateswaran\npraveenv\nibm-research\nAnupama Murthi\nanupamamurthi\nibm-research\nHamid Adebayo"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"pass","explanation":"The summary faithfully conveys the authors' bet: a small model that an organization runs itself, built around a designer/coder split, synthetic training data, and a check-and-repair harness. It preserves the mixed benchmark ranking and the authors' admission that design-language adherence is unmeasured. The central ideas are readable without specialist background. Terms such as open-weight and 20B are not explained, but the surrounding context about owning and self-hosting the model keeps the meaning clear. The question follows from a gap the source itself states and is not a leading claim.","excerpt":"Palette tests one bet: that a small open-weight model, trained on synthetic data in your design language and checked by a harness, can compete with frontier systems while you keep ownership of the result."},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The originalPublished value of 2026-11-03 matches the publication date shown on the post. There is no indication of an earlier submission or first publication.","excerpt":"Published\nNovember 3, 2026"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"Every claim is grounded in the source text. This includes the 20B model trained on data following the IBM Design Language, the designer/coder split with parallel slide coding, the roughly 1,000 synthetic decks, and the rule that a repair is kept only when the checker confirms improvement. It also covers the PresentBench rankings and the stated benchmark gap. The interpretation claim about untested generalization is labeled and conditional. The limitations accurately note that plans were drafted by a separate frontier model and that re-skinning is still being explored.","excerpt":"The key rule is that a rewrite is kept only if the checker confirms the slide improved; otherwise the original stays."},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"The selected media is the verified direct link to the original Hugging Face article. It is the most direct way for a reader to access the source.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-10T19:01:53.712Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}