{"id":"5c04830da922db34d9f0e5d05f7b05c811925126a7ed98d85eec9653e329ea85","title":"Rina Chandran interviews Thomas Dekeyser in Rest of World about refusing AI","argument":"Rina Chandran’s interview with Thomas Dekeyser was published March 17, 2026, in Rest of World. Dekeyser argues that refusing particular technologies need not mean rejecting progress: resistance can imagine a different future from one defined by a narrow idea of progress. He connects current opposition to a long history of people resisting technologies they considered harmful.\n\nDekeyser says contemporary technology can appear to serve a small group with political or monetary interests while bringing others job losses, diminished social interaction, surveillance, and climate harms. He describes disempowerment when organizing and campaigning seem to bring little movement toward different futures; when technology feels unavoidable, he says, material destruction can offer temporary release. He links resistance in Latin America, Africa, and elsewhere to colonial patterns that treat populations as labor or data and extract natural environments for AI infrastructure.\n\nHis argument also concerns what makes a life meaningful. Dekeyser says the AI narrative prizes efficiency, speed, and intelligence, while many people value community, care, and growth. He presents refusal as a struggle against a vision of human life made secondary to machine intelligence. The interview does not establish how widespread these views are or how much influence resistance has over technology decisions.","topicIds":["work-and-business--jobs-and-occupations","job-displacement-and-creation"],"domain":"other","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"Text as retrieved on November 9, 2026; originally published March 17, 2026. This is an edited interview. The claims and interpretations attributed to Thomas Dekeyser are his views as reported by Rina Chandran, not independently established findings. The interview does not establish how widespread the described views are or how much influence resistance has over technology decisions.","speaker":{"name":"Rest of World","roleAtSource":"Publisher"},"source":{"title":"Why refusing AI is a fight for the soul","publisher":"Rest of World","format":"Article","url":"https://restofworld.org/2026/techno-negative-thomas-dekeyser-fighting-ai/","publishedAt":"2026-03-17T10:00:00+00:00","dateBasis":"Date stated on the publisher’s page."},"evidence":[{"text":"Dekeyser argues that rejecting technology need not mean rejecting progress; resistance can involve imagining a different future.","excerpt":"Within the refusal of tech, we can find alternative imaginations of the future. Not anti-progress, only refusing a particular, narrow idea of what “progress” should look like.","url":"https://restofworld.org/2026/techno-negative-thomas-dekeyser-fighting-ai/","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Dekeyser says many people see contemporary technology as serving a small group while harming jobs, social interaction, and the climate.","excerpt":"for many, it feels like it is delivering the opposite: the loss of jobs and meaningful social interactions, more efficient ways of surveilling people, and a deepening climate crisis.","url":"https://restofworld.org/2026/techno-negative-thomas-dekeyser-fighting-ai/","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Dekeyser connects resistance beyond the West to colonial patterns of treating populations as labor or data and extracting their environments for AI infrastructure.","excerpt":"The populations outside of the West are still often simply treated as either cheap labor or as valuable data.","url":"https://restofworld.org/2026/techno-negative-thomas-dekeyser-fighting-ai/","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Dekeyser argues that refusal of AI is also a struggle over which qualities of human life are valued.","excerpt":"The contemporary refusal of AI is a struggle against this promise of a particular kind of human life secondary to that of machine intelligence.","url":"https://restofworld.org/2026/techno-negative-thomas-dekeyser-fighting-ai/","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://restofworld.org/2026/techno-negative-thomas-dekeyser-fighting-ai/","checkedAt":null,"items":[]},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"What evidence would show whether resistance to AI changes how companies build or deploy technology, rather than offering only temporary release from disempowerment?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Rina Chandran interviews Thomas Dekeyser in Rest of World about refusing AI","summary":"Rina Chandran’s interview with Thomas Dekeyser was published March 17, 2026, in Rest of World. Dekeyser argues that refusing particular technologies need not mean rejecting progress: resistance can imagine a different future from one defined by a narrow idea of progress. He connects current opposition to a long history of people resisting technologies they considered harmful.\n\nDekeyser says contemporary technology can appear to serve a small group with political or monetary interests while bringing others job losses, diminished social interaction, surveillance, and climate harms. He describes disempowerment when organizing and campaigning seem to bring little movement toward different futures; when technology feels unavoidable, he says, material destruction can offer temporary release. He links resistance in Latin America, Africa, and elsewhere to colonial patterns that treat populations as labor or data and extract natural environments for AI infrastructure.\n\nHis argument also concerns what makes a life meaningful. Dekeyser says the AI narrative prizes efficiency, speed, and intelligence, while many people value community, care, and growth. He presents refusal as a struggle against a vision of human life made secondary to machine intelligence. The interview does not establish how widespread these views are or how much influence resistance has over technology decisions.","question":"What evidence would show whether resistance to AI changes how companies build or deploy technology, rather than offering only temporary release from disempowerment?","claims":[{"text":"Dekeyser argues that rejecting technology need not mean rejecting progress; resistance can involve imagining a different future.","excerpt":"Within the refusal of tech, we can find alternative imaginations of the future. Not anti-progress, only refusing a particular, narrow idea of what “progress” should look like.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Dekeyser says many people see contemporary technology as serving a small group while harming jobs, social interaction, and the climate.","excerpt":"for many, it feels like it is delivering the opposite: the loss of jobs and meaningful social interactions, more efficient ways of surveilling people, and a deepening climate crisis.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Dekeyser connects resistance beyond the West to colonial patterns of treating populations as labor or data and extracting their environments for AI infrastructure.","excerpt":"The populations outside of the West are still often simply treated as either cheap labor or as valuable data.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Dekeyser argues that refusal of AI is also a struggle over which qualities of human life are valued.","excerpt":"The contemporary refusal of AI is a struggle against this promise of a particular kind of human life secondary to that of machine intelligence.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["Text as retrieved on November 9, 2026; originally published March 17, 2026.","This is an edited interview. The claims and interpretations attributed to Thomas Dekeyser are his views as reported by Rina Chandran, not independently established findings.","The interview does not establish how widespread the described views are or how much influence resistance has over technology decisions."],"mediaId":null,"correctionReason":null,"id":"5c04830da922db34d9f0e5d05f7b05c811925126a7ed98d85eec9653e329ea85","publicationId":"e3ab8fbf-23aa-5211-2bd7-fb11bc598a6a","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://restofworld.org/2026/techno-negative-thomas-dekeyser-fighting-ai/","sourceTitle":"Why refusing AI is a fight for the soul","publisher":"Rest of World","publishedAt":"2026-03-17T10:00:00+00:00","originalPublished":{"value":"2026-03-17T10:00:00+00:00","precision":"instant","basis":"backfill:article_published"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-09T02:57:54.695Z","createdAt":"2026-11-09T07:13:25.625Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["rest-of-world"],"topicIds":["work-and-business--jobs-and-occupations","job-displacement-and-creation"],"media":[],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://restofworld.org/2026/techno-negative-thomas-dekeyser-fighting-ai/","checkedAt":null,"items":[]},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","mediaId":null,"inputHash":"23b98d4de50475d8af707e10da62be850fa57bae0a71bfb5e3ec945e5b580396","rubricVersion":"unrecorded","provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","reasonCodes":["bridge_admitted_by_model"],"confidence":0.54,"decidedAt":"2026-11-09T02:57:54.439Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"051bc66018cfdd3da6e605d85d772d17d5f099e555e8173eecfaf44bf2962987","observationId":"06215032a080bc9e681c78aa4245242e642c904b0dfe1cccc5c01ed099efe42c","retrievedAt":"2026-11-09T02:59:37.026Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"openai/gpt-6-luna","runId":"49ece964-15a8-11c1-28cf-839d16dc9b78"},"reviewer":{"model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5","runId":"1e8ee5aa-a1a9-777a-76ba-1bbad48368d1"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-11-09T07:09:05.156Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/rina-chandran-interviews-thomas-dekeyser-in-rest-of-world-about-5c04830d","formats":{"html":"/readings/rina-chandran-interviews-thomas-dekeyser-in-rest-of-world-about-5c04830d","markdown":"/readings/rina-chandran-interviews-thomas-dekeyser-in-rest-of-world-about-5c04830d.md","json":"/readings/rina-chandran-interviews-thomas-dekeyser-in-rest-of-world-about-5c04830d.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","maintainedGuideLinks":[],"readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[],"entities":[{"id":"rest-of-world","name":"Rest of World","kind":"organization","context":"Rest of World reports technology and its social effects outside a US-only frame.","referenceUrls":["https://restofworld.org/","https://restofworld.org/feed/latest/rss.xml"],"path":"/entities/rest-of-world","json":"/entities/rest-of-world.json","markdown":"/entities/rest-of-world.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"5c04830da922db34d9f0e5d05f7b05c811925126a7ed98d85eec9653e329ea85","revision":"e3ab8fbf-23aa-5211-2bd7-fb11bc598a6a","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"Rina Chandran interviews Thomas Dekeyser in Rest of World about refusing AI","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/rina-chandran-interviews-thomas-dekeyser-in-rest-of-world-about-5c04830d"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://restofworld.org/2026/techno-negative-thomas-dekeyser-fighting-ai/","revision":"051bc66018cfdd3da6e605d85d772d17d5f099e555e8173eecfaf44bf2962987","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Why refusing AI is a fight for the soul","url":"https://restofworld.org/2026/techno-negative-thomas-dekeyser-fighting-ai/"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"5c04830da922db34d9f0e5d05f7b05c811925126a7ed98d85eec9653e329ea85","title":"Rina Chandran interviews Thomas Dekeyser in Rest of World about refusing AI","argument":"Rina Chandran’s interview with Thomas Dekeyser was published March 17, 2026, in Rest of World. Dekeyser argues that refusing particular technologies need not mean rejecting progress: resistance can imagine a different future from one defined by a narrow idea of progress. He connects current opposition to a long history of people resisting technologies they considered harmful.\n\nDekeyser says contemporary technology can appear to serve a small group with political or monetary interests while bringing others job losses, diminished social interaction, surveillance, and climate harms. He describes disempowerment when organizing and campaigning seem to bring little movement toward different futures; when technology feels unavoidable, he says, material destruction can offer temporary release. He links resistance in Latin America, Africa, and elsewhere to colonial patterns that treat populations as labor or data and extract natural environments for AI infrastructure.\n\nHis argument also concerns what makes a life meaningful. Dekeyser says the AI narrative prizes efficiency, speed, and intelligence, while many people value community, care, and growth. He presents refusal as a struggle against a vision of human life made secondary to machine intelligence. The interview does not establish how widespread these views are or how much influence resistance has over technology decisions.","topicIds":["work-and-business--jobs-and-occupations","job-displacement-and-creation"],"domain":"other","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"Text as retrieved on November 9, 2026; originally published March 17, 2026. This is an edited interview. The claims and interpretations attributed to Thomas Dekeyser are his views as reported by Rina Chandran, not independently established findings. The interview does not establish how widespread the described views are or how much influence resistance has over technology decisions.","speaker":{"name":"Rest of World","roleAtSource":"Publisher"},"source":{"title":"Why refusing AI is a fight for the soul","publisher":"Rest of World","format":"Article","url":"https://restofworld.org/2026/techno-negative-thomas-dekeyser-fighting-ai/","publishedAt":"2026-03-17T10:00:00+00:00","dateBasis":"Date stated on the publisher’s page."},"evidence":[{"text":"Dekeyser argues that rejecting technology need not mean rejecting progress; resistance can involve imagining a different future.","excerpt":"Within the refusal of tech, we can find alternative imaginations of the future. Not anti-progress, only refusing a particular, narrow idea of what “progress” should look like.","url":"https://restofworld.org/2026/techno-negative-thomas-dekeyser-fighting-ai/","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Dekeyser says many people see contemporary technology as serving a small group while harming jobs, social interaction, and the climate.","excerpt":"for many, it feels like it is delivering the opposite: the loss of jobs and meaningful social interactions, more efficient ways of surveilling people, and a deepening climate crisis.","url":"https://restofworld.org/2026/techno-negative-thomas-dekeyser-fighting-ai/","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Dekeyser connects resistance beyond the West to colonial patterns of treating populations as labor or data and extracting their environments for AI infrastructure.","excerpt":"The populations outside of the West are still often simply treated as either cheap labor or as valuable data.","url":"https://restofworld.org/2026/techno-negative-thomas-dekeyser-fighting-ai/","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"Dekeyser argues that refusal of AI is also a struggle over which qualities of human life are valued.","excerpt":"The contemporary refusal of AI is a struggle against this promise of a particular kind of human life secondary to that of machine intelligence.","url":"https://restofworld.org/2026/techno-negative-thomas-dekeyser-fighting-ai/","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://restofworld.org/2026/techno-negative-thomas-dekeyser-fighting-ai/","checkedAt":null,"items":[]},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"What evidence would show whether resistance to AI changes how companies build or deploy technology, rather than offering only temporary release from disempowerment?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Rina Chandran interviews Thomas Dekeyser in Rest of World about refusing AI","summary":"Rina Chandran’s interview with Thomas Dekeyser was published March 17, 2026, in Rest of World. Dekeyser argues that refusing particular technologies need not mean rejecting progress: resistance can imagine a different future from one defined by a narrow idea of progress. He connects current opposition to a long history of people resisting technologies they considered harmful.\n\nDekeyser says contemporary technology can appear to serve a small group with political or monetary interests while bringing others job losses, diminished social interaction, surveillance, and climate harms. He describes disempowerment when organizing and campaigning seem to bring little movement toward different futures; when technology feels unavoidable, he says, material destruction can offer temporary release. He links resistance in Latin America, Africa, and elsewhere to colonial patterns that treat populations as labor or data and extract natural environments for AI infrastructure.\n\nHis argument also concerns what makes a life meaningful. Dekeyser says the AI narrative prizes efficiency, speed, and intelligence, while many people value community, care, and growth. He presents refusal as a struggle against a vision of human life made secondary to machine intelligence. The interview does not establish how widespread these views are or how much influence resistance has over technology decisions.","question":"What evidence would show whether resistance to AI changes how companies build or deploy technology, rather than offering only temporary release from disempowerment?","claims":[{"text":"Dekeyser argues that rejecting technology need not mean rejecting progress; resistance can involve imagining a different future.","excerpt":"Within the refusal of tech, we can find alternative imaginations of the future. Not anti-progress, only refusing a particular, narrow idea of what “progress” should look like.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Dekeyser says many people see contemporary technology as serving a small group while harming jobs, social interaction, and the climate.","excerpt":"for many, it feels like it is delivering the opposite: the loss of jobs and meaningful social interactions, more efficient ways of surveilling people, and a deepening climate crisis.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Dekeyser connects resistance beyond the West to colonial patterns of treating populations as labor or data and extracting their environments for AI infrastructure.","excerpt":"The populations outside of the West are still often simply treated as either cheap labor or as valuable data.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"Dekeyser argues that refusal of AI is also a struggle over which qualities of human life are valued.","excerpt":"The contemporary refusal of AI is a struggle against this promise of a particular kind of human life secondary to that of machine intelligence.","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["Text as retrieved on November 9, 2026; originally published March 17, 2026.","This is an edited interview. The claims and interpretations attributed to Thomas Dekeyser are his views as reported by Rina Chandran, not independently established findings.","The interview does not establish how widespread the described views are or how much influence resistance has over technology decisions."],"mediaId":null,"correctionReason":null,"id":"5c04830da922db34d9f0e5d05f7b05c811925126a7ed98d85eec9653e329ea85","publicationId":"e3ab8fbf-23aa-5211-2bd7-fb11bc598a6a","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://restofworld.org/2026/techno-negative-thomas-dekeyser-fighting-ai/","sourceTitle":"Why refusing AI is a fight for the soul","publisher":"Rest of World","publishedAt":"2026-03-17T10:00:00+00:00","originalPublished":{"value":"2026-03-17T10:00:00+00:00","precision":"instant","basis":"backfill:article_published"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-11-09T02:57:54.695Z","createdAt":"2026-11-09T07:13:25.625Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["rest-of-world"],"topicIds":["work-and-business--jobs-and-occupations","job-displacement-and-creation"],"media":[],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://restofworld.org/2026/techno-negative-thomas-dekeyser-fighting-ai/","checkedAt":null,"items":[]},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","mediaId":null,"inputHash":"23b98d4de50475d8af707e10da62be850fa57bae0a71bfb5e3ec945e5b580396","rubricVersion":"unrecorded","provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","reasonCodes":["bridge_admitted_by_model"],"confidence":0.54,"decidedAt":"2026-11-09T02:57:54.439Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"051bc66018cfdd3da6e605d85d772d17d5f099e555e8173eecfaf44bf2962987","observationId":"06215032a080bc9e681c78aa4245242e642c904b0dfe1cccc5c01ed099efe42c","retrievedAt":"2026-11-09T02:59:37.026Z","kind":"publisher-page","preparer":{"model":"openai/gpt-6-luna","runId":"49ece964-15a8-11c1-28cf-839d16dc9b78"},"reviewer":{"model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5","runId":"1e8ee5aa-a1a9-777a-76ba-1bbad48368d1"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-11-09T07:09:05.156Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"e3ab8fbf-23aa-5211-2bd7-fb11bc598a6a","verdict":"passed","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The byline names Rina Chandran, and the text says Dekeyser spoke to Rest of World. The reading presents the arguments as his views from an edited interview, not as established fact or as Escape Meridian's opinion.","excerpt":"The pushback against AI is not a rejection of “progress,” but the creation of a future that doesn’t diminish what it means to be human, he told Rest of World."},{"dimension":"summary","status":"pass","explanation":"The reading leads with Dekeyser's central thesis that refusal is not anti-progress. It then follows his main threads: tech serving the few, disempowerment, colonial patterns and the meaning of human life. Its language is plain. It omits his role as a University of Southampton lecturer, his book Techno-Negative, the Big Tech facade argument and Promethean shame. These are optional details, and their absence does not block understanding. The question follows from his point about temporary release.","excerpt":"Not anti-progress, only refusing a particular, narrow idea of what “progress” should look like."},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"The reading's March 17, 2026 date matches the 17 March 2026 dateline and the originalPublished instant (UTC). The page was modified in June 2026, but every passage the reading uses is the core interview body, which is plainly original. There is no hindsight framing. This is a publisher page, so no archive disclosure is needed.","excerpt":"By Rina Chandran\n17 March 2026"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"Each claim is source-stated and backed by an exact excerpt. The summary keeps his hedging, such as 'can appear' and 'for many'. Its statement that the interview does not establish how widespread these views are, or how much influence resistance has, is a fair limitation and not an invented claim. Although the page was edited after publication, the cited text is plainly part of the original interview.","excerpt":"When tech surrounds us in a way that feels both omnipresent and inevitable, material destruction offers a temporary release from that disempowerment."},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"No media was selected, and no verified candidates were supplied, so there is no media identity or relevance to check.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-11-09T07:09:05.156Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}