{"id":"64a48bfc8182be1a5f81d46e6f1387ba9ad01cf902f74d3d1512e45f05ac2b9f","title":"Sam Altman, Greg Brockman and Ilya Sutskever argue at OpenAI for superintelligence governance","argument":"OpenAI authors Sam Altman, Greg Brockman and Ilya Sutskever published this argument on May 22, 2023. They say it is time to prepare for superintelligence, which they describe as future AI systems dramatically more capable than even AGI. They argue that such systems could bring great prosperity but also pose existential risk, so governance should not wait until risks emerge.\n\nTheir proposed starting points are coordination among leading development efforts, an international authority able to inspect systems and require audits above a capability or compute threshold, and research into making superintelligence safe. They distinguish these systems from models below a significant capability threshold, which they say should not face the same regulation. They also argue that decisions about powerful systems and their deployment need strong public oversight, while individual users should retain substantial control within public bounds.\n\nThe authors say they pursue this work because they expect it to improve the world and because they believe stopping superintelligence would be difficult and risky. They acknowledge that they do not yet know how to design a public decision-making mechanism, and call safety an open research question.","topicIds":["artificial-general-intelligence"],"domain":"other","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"Text as retrieved on October 24, 2026; originally published May 22, 2023. This is an archived copy. The page is marked as edited after publication, so the retrieved text may include later additions; the evidence does not identify which passages changed. The authors say they do not yet know how to design the public decision-making mechanism, and describe making superintelligence safe as an open research question.","speaker":{"name":"OpenAI","roleAtSource":"Publisher"},"source":{"title":"Governance of superintelligence","publisher":"OpenAI","format":"Article","url":"https://openai.com/index/governance-of-superintelligence","publishedAt":"2023-05-22T07:00:00.000Z","dateBasis":"Date supplied by the publisher’s feed."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors say superintelligence governance should begin before such systems emerge, citing possible benefits and existential risk.","excerpt":"We can have a dramatically more prosperous future; but we have to manage risk to get there. Given the possibility of existential risk, we can’t just be reactive.","url":"https://openai.com/index/governance-of-superintelligence","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors propose coordination among leading development efforts, an international authority with inspection and audit powers, and technical safety research.","excerpt":"First, we need some degree of coordination among the leading development efforts","url":"https://openai.com/index/governance-of-superintelligence","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that models below a significant capability threshold should not face the regulation they describe for superintelligence.","excerpt":"We think it’s important to allow companies and open-source projects to develop models below a significant capability threshold, without the kind of regulation we describe here","url":"https://openai.com/index/governance-of-superintelligence","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors call for strong public oversight of governance and deployment decisions, alongside substantial user control within public bounds.","excerpt":"We believe people around the world should democratically decide on the bounds and defaults for AI systems. We don't yet know how to design such a mechanism","url":"https://openai.com/index/governance-of-superintelligence","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say they believe stopping superintelligence would be difficult and risky.","excerpt":"stopping it would require something like a global surveillance regime, and even that isn’t guaranteed to work.","url":"https://openai.com/index/governance-of-superintelligence","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The source dates the piece May 22, 2023.","excerpt":"May 22, 2023","url":"https://openai.com/index/governance-of-superintelligence","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://openai.com/index/governance-of-superintelligence","checkedAt":null,"items":[]},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How would the public decision-making mechanism the authors envision set bounds for powerful systems while preserving individual users’ control?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Sam Altman, Greg Brockman and Ilya Sutskever argue at OpenAI for superintelligence governance","summary":"OpenAI authors Sam Altman, Greg Brockman and Ilya Sutskever published this argument on May 22, 2023. They say it is time to prepare for superintelligence, which they describe as future AI systems dramatically more capable than even AGI. They argue that such systems could bring great prosperity but also pose existential risk, so governance should not wait until risks emerge.\n\nTheir proposed starting points are coordination among leading development efforts, an international authority able to inspect systems and require audits above a capability or compute threshold, and research into making superintelligence safe. They distinguish these systems from models below a significant capability threshold, which they say should not face the same regulation. They also argue that decisions about powerful systems and their deployment need strong public oversight, while individual users should retain substantial control within public bounds.\n\nThe authors say they pursue this work because they expect it to improve the world and because they believe stopping superintelligence would be difficult and risky. They acknowledge that they do not yet know how to design a public decision-making mechanism, and call safety an open research question.","question":"How would the public decision-making mechanism the authors envision set bounds for powerful systems while preserving individual users’ control?","claims":[{"text":"The authors say superintelligence governance should begin before such systems emerge, citing possible benefits and existential risk.","excerpt":"We can have a dramatically more prosperous future; but we have to manage risk to get there. Given the possibility of existential risk, we can’t just be reactive.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors propose coordination among leading development efforts, an international authority with inspection and audit powers, and technical safety research.","excerpt":"First, we need some degree of coordination among the leading development efforts","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that models below a significant capability threshold should not face the regulation they describe for superintelligence.","excerpt":"We think it’s important to allow companies and open-source projects to develop models below a significant capability threshold, without the kind of regulation we describe here","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors call for strong public oversight of governance and deployment decisions, alongside substantial user control within public bounds.","excerpt":"We believe people around the world should democratically decide on the bounds and defaults for AI systems. We don't yet know how to design such a mechanism","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say they believe stopping superintelligence would be difficult and risky.","excerpt":"stopping it would require something like a global surveillance regime, and even that isn’t guaranteed to work.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The source dates the piece May 22, 2023.","excerpt":"May 22, 2023","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["Text as retrieved on October 24, 2026; originally published May 22, 2023.","This is an archived copy. The page is marked as edited after publication, so the retrieved text may include later additions; the evidence does not identify which passages changed.","The authors say they do not yet know how to design the public decision-making mechanism, and describe making superintelligence safe as an open research question."],"mediaId":null,"correctionReason":null,"id":"64a48bfc8182be1a5f81d46e6f1387ba9ad01cf902f74d3d1512e45f05ac2b9f","publicationId":"526e191f-a5a2-6fec-07ee-67359cd6d1cd","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://openai.com/index/governance-of-superintelligence","sourceTitle":"Governance of superintelligence","publisher":"OpenAI","publishedAt":"2023-05-22T07:00:00.000Z","originalPublished":{"value":"2023-05-22T07:00:00.000Z","precision":"instant","basis":"backfill:feed_published"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-24T08:36:28.697Z","createdAt":"2026-10-31T06:19:14.177Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["openai"],"topicIds":["artificial-general-intelligence"],"media":[],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://openai.com/index/governance-of-superintelligence","checkedAt":null,"items":[]},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","mediaId":null,"inputHash":"6232a5d060a261f5fea534067ac1fb50c6d7bbb5f8731a38eed5a5d4a8a0867d","reasonCodes":["bridge_screen"],"rubricVersion":"bridge-screen-v5","confidence":0.58,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","decidedAt":"2026-10-29T16:50:03.270Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"399d89c9657e912f4fbb430188fc4c5232449bc1d94554910f12b49c265c1dc5","observationId":"042f644e3b583d7197a391cd9cb6193ce5a6e27da0483c1b25856d67035a2f40","retrievedAt":"2026-10-24T08:37:46.593Z","kind":"archive-copy","preparer":{"model":"openai/gpt-6-luna","runId":"f24a4384-cf56-db7c-85a9-eb2118297856"},"reviewer":{"model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5","runId":"8dc7fbda-f6dc-b3c0-5ea1-c0242702adfd"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-10-31T06:19:13.779Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}},"canonicalUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/sam-altman-greg-brockman-and-ilya-sutskever-argue-at-openai-for-64a48bfc","formats":{"html":"/readings/sam-altman-greg-brockman-and-ilya-sutskever-argue-at-openai-for-64a48bfc","markdown":"/readings/sam-altman-greg-brockman-and-ilya-sutskever-argue-at-openai-for-64a48bfc.md","json":"/readings/sam-altman-greg-brockman-and-ilya-sutskever-argue-at-openai-for-64a48bfc.json"},"attribution":"Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.","readerContext":{"version":"reader-context-v1","attribution":"Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.","terms":[{"id":"term-superintelligence","name":"Superintelligence","explanation":"A hypothetical AI far more capable than people across most intellectual tasks.","referenceUrl":"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superintelligence"},{"id":"term-agi","name":"Artificial general intelligence","explanation":"The idea of AI with broad problem-solving, creativity and adaptability across different tasks.","referenceUrl":"https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/glossary#artificial-general-intelligence"}],"entities":[{"id":"sam-altman","name":"Sam Altman","kind":"person","context":"Sam Altman publishes essays about AI and technology on his personal blog, separate from OpenAI announcements.","referenceUrls":["https://blog.samaltman.com/","https://openai.com/our-structure/","https://blog.samaltman.com/posts.atom"],"path":"/entities/sam-altman","json":"/entities/sam-altman.json","markdown":"/entities/sam-altman.md"},{"id":"greg-brockman","name":"Greg Brockman","kind":"person","context":"Greg Brockman publishes personal essays about engineering, AI research and organizational work.","referenceUrls":["https://blog.gregbrockman.com/"],"path":"/entities/greg-brockman","json":"/entities/greg-brockman.json","markdown":"/entities/greg-brockman.md"},{"id":"openai","name":"OpenAI","kind":"organization","context":"OpenAI develops AI models and products and publishes research, release announcements and evaluations.","referenceUrls":["https://openai.com/news/"],"path":"/entities/openai","json":"/entities/openai.json","markdown":"/entities/openai.md"}]},"researchQuestions":[],"withdrawn":false,"references":{"schemaVersion":1,"target":{"type":"reading","id":"64a48bfc8182be1a5f81d46e6f1387ba9ad01cf902f74d3d1512e45f05ac2b9f","revision":"526e191f-a5a2-6fec-07ee-67359cd6d1cd","revisionKind":"publication-id","title":"Sam Altman, Greg Brockman and Ilya Sutskever argue at OpenAI for superintelligence governance","url":"https://escapemeridian.com/readings/sam-altman-greg-brockman-and-ilya-sutskever-argue-at-openai-for-64a48bfc"},"source":{"type":"source","id":"https://openai.com/index/governance-of-superintelligence","revision":"399d89c9657e912f4fbb430188fc4c5232449bc1d94554910f12b49c265c1dc5","revisionKind":"sha256-source-text","title":"Governance of superintelligence","url":"https://openai.com/index/governance-of-superintelligence"},"status":"available","items":[],"next":null,"scope":"Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter."},"revisions":[{"id":"64a48bfc8182be1a5f81d46e6f1387ba9ad01cf902f74d3d1512e45f05ac2b9f","title":"Sam Altman, Greg Brockman and Ilya Sutskever argue at OpenAI for superintelligence governance","argument":"OpenAI authors Sam Altman, Greg Brockman and Ilya Sutskever published this argument on May 22, 2023. They say it is time to prepare for superintelligence, which they describe as future AI systems dramatically more capable than even AGI. They argue that such systems could bring great prosperity but also pose existential risk, so governance should not wait until risks emerge.\n\nTheir proposed starting points are coordination among leading development efforts, an international authority able to inspect systems and require audits above a capability or compute threshold, and research into making superintelligence safe. They distinguish these systems from models below a significant capability threshold, which they say should not face the same regulation. They also argue that decisions about powerful systems and their deployment need strong public oversight, while individual users should retain substantial control within public bounds.\n\nThe authors say they pursue this work because they expect it to improve the world and because they believe stopping superintelligence would be difficult and risky. They acknowledge that they do not yet know how to design a public decision-making mechanism, and call safety an open research question.","topicIds":["artificial-general-intelligence"],"domain":"other","claimType":"attributed reading","limits":"Text as retrieved on October 24, 2026; originally published May 22, 2023. This is an archived copy. The page is marked as edited after publication, so the retrieved text may include later additions; the evidence does not identify which passages changed. The authors say they do not yet know how to design the public decision-making mechanism, and describe making superintelligence safe as an open research question.","speaker":{"name":"OpenAI","roleAtSource":"Publisher"},"source":{"title":"Governance of superintelligence","publisher":"OpenAI","format":"Article","url":"https://openai.com/index/governance-of-superintelligence","publishedAt":"2023-05-22T07:00:00.000Z","dateBasis":"Date supplied by the publisher’s feed."},"evidence":[{"text":"The authors say superintelligence governance should begin before such systems emerge, citing possible benefits and existential risk.","excerpt":"We can have a dramatically more prosperous future; but we have to manage risk to get there. Given the possibility of existential risk, we can’t just be reactive.","url":"https://openai.com/index/governance-of-superintelligence","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors propose coordination among leading development efforts, an international authority with inspection and audit powers, and technical safety research.","excerpt":"First, we need some degree of coordination among the leading development efforts","url":"https://openai.com/index/governance-of-superintelligence","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that models below a significant capability threshold should not face the regulation they describe for superintelligence.","excerpt":"We think it’s important to allow companies and open-source projects to develop models below a significant capability threshold, without the kind of regulation we describe here","url":"https://openai.com/index/governance-of-superintelligence","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors call for strong public oversight of governance and deployment decisions, alongside substantial user control within public bounds.","excerpt":"We believe people around the world should democratically decide on the bounds and defaults for AI systems. We don't yet know how to design such a mechanism","url":"https://openai.com/index/governance-of-superintelligence","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say they believe stopping superintelligence would be difficult and risky.","excerpt":"stopping it would require something like a global surveillance regime, and even that isn’t guaranteed to work.","url":"https://openai.com/index/governance-of-superintelligence","relationship":"Source-stated"},{"text":"The source dates the piece May 22, 2023.","excerpt":"May 22, 2023","url":"https://openai.com/index/governance-of-superintelligence","relationship":"Source-stated"}],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://openai.com/index/governance-of-superintelligence","checkedAt":null,"items":[]},"assumptions":[],"openQuestion":{"attribution":"Open question","text":"How would the public decision-making mechanism the authors envision set bounds for powerful systems while preserving individual users’ control?"},"whatWouldChangeView":{"attribution":"Change condition not recorded","text":""},"editorialComparisons":[],"live":{"title":"Sam Altman, Greg Brockman and Ilya Sutskever argue at OpenAI for superintelligence governance","summary":"OpenAI authors Sam Altman, Greg Brockman and Ilya Sutskever published this argument on May 22, 2023. They say it is time to prepare for superintelligence, which they describe as future AI systems dramatically more capable than even AGI. They argue that such systems could bring great prosperity but also pose existential risk, so governance should not wait until risks emerge.\n\nTheir proposed starting points are coordination among leading development efforts, an international authority able to inspect systems and require audits above a capability or compute threshold, and research into making superintelligence safe. They distinguish these systems from models below a significant capability threshold, which they say should not face the same regulation. They also argue that decisions about powerful systems and their deployment need strong public oversight, while individual users should retain substantial control within public bounds.\n\nThe authors say they pursue this work because they expect it to improve the world and because they believe stopping superintelligence would be difficult and risky. They acknowledge that they do not yet know how to design a public decision-making mechanism, and call safety an open research question.","question":"How would the public decision-making mechanism the authors envision set bounds for powerful systems while preserving individual users’ control?","claims":[{"text":"The authors say superintelligence governance should begin before such systems emerge, citing possible benefits and existential risk.","excerpt":"We can have a dramatically more prosperous future; but we have to manage risk to get there. Given the possibility of existential risk, we can’t just be reactive.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors propose coordination among leading development efforts, an international authority with inspection and audit powers, and technical safety research.","excerpt":"First, we need some degree of coordination among the leading development efforts","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors argue that models below a significant capability threshold should not face the regulation they describe for superintelligence.","excerpt":"We think it’s important to allow companies and open-source projects to develop models below a significant capability threshold, without the kind of regulation we describe here","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors call for strong public oversight of governance and deployment decisions, alongside substantial user control within public bounds.","excerpt":"We believe people around the world should democratically decide on the bounds and defaults for AI systems. We don't yet know how to design such a mechanism","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The authors say they believe stopping superintelligence would be difficult and risky.","excerpt":"stopping it would require something like a global surveillance regime, and even that isn’t guaranteed to work.","support":"source-stated"},{"text":"The source dates the piece May 22, 2023.","excerpt":"May 22, 2023","support":"source-stated"}],"limitations":["Text as retrieved on October 24, 2026; originally published May 22, 2023.","This is an archived copy. The page is marked as edited after publication, so the retrieved text may include later additions; the evidence does not identify which passages changed.","The authors say they do not yet know how to design the public decision-making mechanism, and describe making superintelligence safe as an open research question."],"mediaId":null,"correctionReason":null,"id":"64a48bfc8182be1a5f81d46e6f1387ba9ad01cf902f74d3d1512e45f05ac2b9f","publicationId":"526e191f-a5a2-6fec-07ee-67359cd6d1cd","version":1,"sourceUrl":"https://openai.com/index/governance-of-superintelligence","sourceTitle":"Governance of superintelligence","publisher":"OpenAI","publishedAt":"2023-05-22T07:00:00.000Z","originalPublished":{"value":"2023-05-22T07:00:00.000Z","precision":"instant","basis":"backfill:feed_published"},"firstObservedAt":"2026-10-24T08:36:28.697Z","createdAt":"2026-10-31T06:19:14.177Z","historical":true,"entityIds":["openai"],"topicIds":["artificial-general-intelligence"],"media":[],"sourceMedia":{"status":"unchecked","sourceUrl":"https://openai.com/index/governance-of-superintelligence","checkedAt":null,"items":[]},"editorialDecision":{"outcome":"accept","mediaId":null,"inputHash":"6232a5d060a261f5fea534067ac1fb50c6d7bbb5f8731a38eed5a5d4a8a0867d","reasonCodes":["bridge_screen"],"rubricVersion":"bridge-screen-v5","confidence":0.58,"provider":"typesafe","model":"jev-1.13.0","decidedAt":"2026-10-29T16:50:03.270Z"},"provenance":{"textHash":"399d89c9657e912f4fbb430188fc4c5232449bc1d94554910f12b49c265c1dc5","observationId":"042f644e3b583d7197a391cd9cb6193ce5a6e27da0483c1b25856d67035a2f40","retrievedAt":"2026-10-24T08:37:46.593Z","kind":"archive-copy","preparer":{"model":"openai/gpt-6-luna","runId":"f24a4384-cf56-db7c-85a9-eb2118297856"},"reviewer":{"model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5","runId":"8dc7fbda-f6dc-b3c0-5ea1-c0242702adfd"}},"audit":{"status":"passed","reviewedAt":"2026-10-31T06:19:13.779Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}}}],"audits":[{"publicationId":"526e191f-a5a2-6fec-07ee-67359cd6d1cd","verdict":"passed","findings":[{"dimension":"attribution","status":"pass","explanation":"The reading attributes the argument to OpenAI authors Sam Altman, Greg Brockman and Ilya Sutskever, matching the byline. The views are framed as the authors' own arguments, not as established fact.","excerpt":"Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, Ilya Sutskever"},{"dimension":"summary","status":"pass","explanation":"The summary clearly explains the actor, the call to govern superintelligence early, the three proposed starting points, the carve-out for systems below a capability threshold, the call for public oversight, and the authors' reasons. Superintelligence and AGI are defined on the page. The question follows from the source's admitted gap on mechanism design. Omitting the ten-year forecast does not distort the argument.","excerpt":"here we lay out our initial thinking on three of them."},{"dimension":"date","status":"pass","explanation":"May 22, 2023 matches the source dateline and the UTC day of originalPublished. The reading discloses that this is an archive copy and that the page was edited after publication. It does not use the later-dated related-article listings (2024), and it uses no hindsight framing.","excerpt":"May 22, 2023\nGovernance of superintelligence"},{"dimension":"support","status":"pass","explanation":"Each claim matches the main article body, which is plainly part of the original piece. These include the call for non-reactive governance, coordination, an IAEA-like authority with a compute threshold, safety research, the exemption below the threshold, democratic bounds with user control, and the reasons for building. The reading does not add unsupported benefits, costs or forecasts.","excerpt":"within these wide bounds, individual users should have a lot of control over how the AI they use behaves."},{"dimension":"media","status":"pass","explanation":"No media is selected, and no verified candidates were supplied, so there is no media identity or relevance issue.","excerpt":null}],"createdAt":"2026-10-31T06:19:13.779Z","model":"anthropic/claude-opus-5.5"}],"correctionUrl":"https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/"}