# TechCrunch reports 99.co’s funding and search approach

[Canonical reading](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/techcrunch-reports-99-co-s-funding-and-search-approach-a9e6637b)

TechCrunch published this report on January 29, 2015. The article says Singapore property search startup 99.co raised funding from Sequoia and Eduardo Saverin, and that the company said the round valued it at $8 million. It describes 99.co as operating only in Singapore, with plans to explore expansion elsewhere in Southeast Asia.

CEO and co-founder Darius Cheung told TechCrunch that rival services let agents pay for more prominent listings, while 99.co used its search algorithm without prioritizing results. The company had not yet begun monetizing its service. Cheung said it might charge owners whose properties were rented or sold through the site, or charge a flat fee for listings.

The article presents 99.co’s approach as an alternative to advertising-based listing placement, but provides no evidence comparing search quality or business results. Its expansion and revenue plans were prospective, not reported outcomes. Whether users found the search results more relevant, and whether the proposed fees could support the business, remained open questions.

Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.

## Original source

TechCrunch · Article

Original source date: Jan 29, 2015 (2015-01-29).

Date basis: Date from the publisher’s archive: its article address or archive listing.

Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-10-28T01:32:34.291Z. First observed: 2026-10-24T05:19:43.169Z. Retrieved: 2026-10-24T05:21:38.340Z.

- [Singapore Property Site 99.co Lands $1.6M From Sequoia And Facebook Co-Founder Saverin](https://techcrunch.com/2015/01/29/99-co-sequoia-saverin/)

## Limits

Text as retrieved on 2026-10-24; originally published 2015-01-29. The article reports company statements and plans; it does not provide comparative results for search quality or evidence that the proposed revenue model worked.


## Open question

Would 99.co’s unprioritized search results and proposed owner fees attract users and sustain the business?


## Source-stated

TechCrunch reported that 99.co raised funding from Sequoia and Eduardo Saverin, with the company saying the round valued it at $8 million.

> The company confirmed that the round values it at $8 million (SG$10 million).

- [Supporting source](https://techcrunch.com/2015/01/29/99-co-sequoia-saverin/)

## Source-stated

TechCrunch reported that 99.co was operating only in Singapore and considering expansion across Southeast Asia.

> At this point, 99.co is operational in Singapore only.

- [Supporting source](https://techcrunch.com/2015/01/29/99-co-sequoia-saverin/)

## Source-stated

Cheung said 99.co used its search algorithm to surface listings without prioritizing results, unlike services where agents could pay for prominence.

> 99.co takes a more user-centric approach, it doesn’t prioritize any results and uses only its search algorithm to surface listings.

- [Supporting source](https://techcrunch.com/2015/01/29/99-co-sequoia-saverin/)

## Source-stated

Cheung said the service had not yet begun monetizing and might charge owners who secured business through the site or charge a flat listing fee.

> Though it is not yet monetizing its service yet, Cheung said 99.co will likely make money via a fee to property owners that secure business from the site.

- [Supporting source](https://techcrunch.com/2015/01/29/99-co-sequoia-saverin/)

## Source and contributor context

TechCrunch · Publisher

The publisher is identified here. No individual author has been inferred.


## Source media

Media retrieval status: unchecked.


## Terms and references

Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.


## Editorial provenance

Version 1. Publication ID: 8ea92d99-e8e5-e81f-459e-2150522e5ecc.

Prepared by openai/gpt-6-luna; grounding review by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5.

Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-10-28T01:31:35.555Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.

Editorial selection: accept; reasons: bridge\_admitted\_by\_model.

Observation: be46b968bd38dd87d342c6e6bdbeb58e62f9b10203d30d9d6b1e04624ed67cac. Source text hash: 65802f67f1b4dcd9dad00443559a388e633db437457d6d62effffaf358232520.


## Revision and source-check history

### Version 1 — 2026-10-28T01:32:34.291Z

TechCrunch published this report on January 29, 2015. The article says Singapore property search startup 99.co raised funding from Sequoia and Eduardo Saverin, and that the company said the round valued it at $8 million. It describes 99.co as operating only in Singapore, with plans to explore expansion elsewhere in Southeast Asia.

CEO and co-founder Darius Cheung told TechCrunch that rival services let agents pay for more prominent listings, while 99.co used its search algorithm without prioritizing results. The company had not yet begun monetizing its service. Cheung said it might charge owners whose properties were rented or sold through the site, or charge a flat fee for listings.

The article presents 99.co’s approach as an alternative to advertising-based listing placement, but provides no evidence comparing search quality or business results. Its expansion and revenue plans were prospective, not reported outcomes. Whether users found the search results more relevant, and whether the proposed fees could support the business, remained open questions.

## Original source

TechCrunch · Article

Original source date: Jan 29, 2015 (2015-01-29).

Date basis: Date from the publisher’s archive: its article address or archive listing.

Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-10-28T01:32:34.291Z. First observed: 2026-10-24T05:19:43.169Z. Retrieved: 2026-10-24T05:21:38.340Z.

- [Singapore Property Site 99.co Lands $1.6M From Sequoia And Facebook Co-Founder Saverin](https://techcrunch.com/2015/01/29/99-co-sequoia-saverin/)

## Limits

Text as retrieved on 2026-10-24; originally published 2015-01-29. The article reports company statements and plans; it does not provide comparative results for search quality or evidence that the proposed revenue model worked.


## Open question

Would 99.co’s unprioritized search results and proposed owner fees attract users and sustain the business?


## Source-stated

TechCrunch reported that 99.co raised funding from Sequoia and Eduardo Saverin, with the company saying the round valued it at $8 million.

> The company confirmed that the round values it at $8 million (SG$10 million).

- [Supporting source](https://techcrunch.com/2015/01/29/99-co-sequoia-saverin/)

## Source-stated

TechCrunch reported that 99.co was operating only in Singapore and considering expansion across Southeast Asia.

> At this point, 99.co is operational in Singapore only.

- [Supporting source](https://techcrunch.com/2015/01/29/99-co-sequoia-saverin/)

## Source-stated

Cheung said 99.co used its search algorithm to surface listings without prioritizing results, unlike services where agents could pay for prominence.

> 99.co takes a more user-centric approach, it doesn’t prioritize any results and uses only its search algorithm to surface listings.

- [Supporting source](https://techcrunch.com/2015/01/29/99-co-sequoia-saverin/)

## Source-stated

Cheung said the service had not yet begun monetizing and might charge owners who secured business through the site or charge a flat listing fee.

> Though it is not yet monetizing its service yet, Cheung said 99.co will likely make money via a fee to property owners that secure business from the site.

- [Supporting source](https://techcrunch.com/2015/01/29/99-co-sequoia-saverin/)

## Source and contributor context

TechCrunch · Publisher

The publisher is identified here. No individual author has been inferred.


## Source media

Media retrieval status: unchecked.


## Terms and references

Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.


## Editorial provenance

Version 1. Publication ID: 8ea92d99-e8e5-e81f-459e-2150522e5ecc.

Prepared by openai/gpt-6-luna; grounding review by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5.

Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-10-28T01:31:35.555Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.

Editorial selection: accept; reasons: bridge\_admitted\_by\_model.

Observation: be46b968bd38dd87d342c6e6bdbeb58e62f9b10203d30d9d6b1e04624ed67cac. Source text hash: 65802f67f1b4dcd9dad00443559a388e633db437457d6d62effffaf358232520.


### passed — 2026-10-28T01:31:35.555Z — anthropic/claude-opus-5.5

Publication: 8ea92d99-e8e5-e81f-459e-2150522e5ecc

attribution — pass: The reading correctly identifies TechCrunch as the publisher. It attributes the valuation to the company and the search-model and monetization statements to CEO and co-founder Darius Cheung, consistent with the text.

> 99.co CEO and co-founder Darius Cheung told TechCrunch that the ad-based model of other services effectively allows real estate agents to pay to have their listings feature more prominently.

summary — pass: The title, summary and question accurately reflect the article: the funding round, the valuation, Singapore-only operation, expansion plans, the ad-free ranking approach and possible fees. A general reader can understand the actor and the development. The question follows from the source's unproven model and is not leading.

> Our search results are relevant to our visitors and not corrupted by advertising money

date — pass: originalPublished 2015-01-29 at day precision matches the URL path. The modification date is the same day. Later page chrome, including the author bio and popular-story links, is not used. Expansion and revenue are framed as plans, not outcomes. The source is a publisher page, so no archive disclosure is required.

> Cheung said that an expansion will probably happen in the second half of 2015

support — pass: Each claim is supported by its quoted excerpt. The limitations correctly note that the source has no comparative search-quality data and no evidence the revenue model worked. No unsupported benefits are implied. The figures reflect the article's same-day correction.

> The site could charge a flat fee for all listings too, he added.

media — pass: No media was selected and none was supplied or verified, so there is no media identity or relevance issue.

## Recorded references

Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter.

No public references recorded here yet.

[Reference data (JSON)](/readings/a9e6637bbfe11f7fda575c1f01a117539bc7eacbd414db6fe11582bc9668ecbc/references.json)

## Corrections and challenges

[Send a correction or an opposing source](https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/)

[JSON record](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/techcrunch-reports-99-co-s-funding-and-search-approach-a9e6637b.json)