# Yang and coauthors’ arXiv paper proposes Terminal-RSI for refining terminal agents [Canonical reading](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/yang-and-coauthors-arxiv-paper-proposes-terminal-rsi-for-01452c40) In a paper on arXiv, Junyao Yang and coauthors introduce Terminal-RSI, a method that alternates rewriting verified task trajectories with refining the agent’s policy, or learned action strategy. They argue this pairing can turn partial task progress into completed tasks: rewriting retains successful behaviors, while policy refinement uses feedback from a critic, a model that evaluates progress. The authors report results for a five-stage sequence built from a Qwen3.8-27B base model. Terminal-RSI-27B scores 19.84% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, 86.52% on Terminal-Bench 2.1, 16.95% on Terminal-Bench 3.0, and 79.00% on Terminal-Bench Hard. On LHTB, they report strict completion increasing from 0/46 to 5/46; on SWR100, success rises from 3.00% to 6.00%. These are benchmark results, not evidence here of performance in broader real-world use. The proposal’s central idea is to make each refinement stage build on behaviors found in earlier stages, while distinguishing strict success from partial credit. How well does this approach generalize beyond the reported benchmarks? Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims. ## Original source arXiv cs.AI · Article Original source date: Oct 15, 2026 (2026-10-15). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-10T11:03:28.148Z. First observed: 2026-10-16T08:16:52.322Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-02T05:32:06.199Z. - [Terminal-RSI: Recursive Self-Improving Terminal Agents via Recursive Self-Rewrite and Policy-Refine](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22192) ## Limits The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract and page text, not the paper’s full evaluation details; it does not establish how the reported results compare with baselines or perform in broader real-world use. The abstract reports benchmark outcomes but does not describe the tasks or evaluation conditions in enough detail to assess how broadly the results apply. ## Open question How well does Terminal-RSI generalize beyond the reported benchmarks? ## Source-stated Yang and coauthors present Terminal-RSI, which alternates rewriting verified trajectories and refining a policy with critic feedback. > We present Terminal-RSI, which alternates Recursive Self-Rewrite (RSR) of verified trajectories with critic-inheriting Recursive Policy-Refine (RPR). - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22192) ## Source-stated The authors report Terminal-RSI-27B benchmark scores of 19.84% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, 86.52% on Terminal-Bench 2.1, 16.95% on Terminal-Bench 3.0, and 79.00% on Terminal-Bench Hard. > yields Terminal-RSI-27B: 19.84% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, 86.52% on Terminal-Bench 2.1, 16.95% on Terminal-Bench 3.0, and 79.00% on Terminal-Bench Hard. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22192) ## Source-stated The authors report strict completion on LHTB rising from 0/46 to 5/46 and SWR100 success rising from 3.00% to 6.00%. > On LHTB, process reward rises from 0.21 to 0.37 and strict completion from 0/46 to 5/46; SWR100 success doubles from 3.00% to 6.00%. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22192) ## Source-stated The authors say each retained stage consolidates discovered behaviors and advances the agent from partial local repairs toward strict terminal verification. > each retained stage consolidates discovered behaviors and progressively advances the agent from partial local repairs to strict terminal verification. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22192) ## Source and contributor context Yang, Junyao, Li, Zongxia, Shi, Yucheng, Li, Zhongzhi, Wang, Ruhan, Zhou, Ruiwen, Mi, Haitao, Yan, Shuicheng, Liang, Leowei · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## Benchmark A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected. - [Definition reference](https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09110) ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: 6eac5b84-8213-446b-84a2-7c7225b6cddf. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-10T11:03:28.148Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: 930b240ab727b812a33d5131ad7a0c90e6f426198370d169d80a09301cfed10c. Source text hash: 26136e792173e644dc32055982a9c118131f7116c226bd28aace4295a6415f21. ## Revision and source-check history ### Version 1 — 2026-11-10T11:03:28.148Z In a paper on arXiv, Junyao Yang and coauthors introduce Terminal-RSI, a method that alternates rewriting verified task trajectories with refining the agent’s policy, or learned action strategy. They argue this pairing can turn partial task progress into completed tasks: rewriting retains successful behaviors, while policy refinement uses feedback from a critic, a model that evaluates progress. The authors report results for a five-stage sequence built from a Qwen3.8-27B base model. Terminal-RSI-27B scores 19.84% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, 86.52% on Terminal-Bench 2.1, 16.95% on Terminal-Bench 3.0, and 79.00% on Terminal-Bench Hard. On LHTB, they report strict completion increasing from 0/46 to 5/46; on SWR100, success rises from 3.00% to 6.00%. These are benchmark results, not evidence here of performance in broader real-world use. The proposal’s central idea is to make each refinement stage build on behaviors found in earlier stages, while distinguishing strict success from partial credit. How well does this approach generalize beyond the reported benchmarks? ## Original source arXiv cs.AI · Article Original source date: Oct 15, 2026 (2026-10-15). Date basis: Date basis not provided. Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-10T11:03:28.148Z. First observed: 2026-10-16T08:16:52.322Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-02T05:32:06.199Z. - [Terminal-RSI: Recursive Self-Improving Terminal Agents via Recursive Self-Rewrite and Policy-Refine](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22192) ## Limits The supplied evidence is the arXiv abstract and page text, not the paper’s full evaluation details; it does not establish how the reported results compare with baselines or perform in broader real-world use. The abstract reports benchmark outcomes but does not describe the tasks or evaluation conditions in enough detail to assess how broadly the results apply. ## Open question How well does Terminal-RSI generalize beyond the reported benchmarks? ## Source-stated Yang and coauthors present Terminal-RSI, which alternates rewriting verified trajectories and refining a policy with critic feedback. > We present Terminal-RSI, which alternates Recursive Self-Rewrite (RSR) of verified trajectories with critic-inheriting Recursive Policy-Refine (RPR). - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22192) ## Source-stated The authors report Terminal-RSI-27B benchmark scores of 19.84% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, 86.52% on Terminal-Bench 2.1, 16.95% on Terminal-Bench 3.0, and 79.00% on Terminal-Bench Hard. > yields Terminal-RSI-27B: 19.84% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, 86.52% on Terminal-Bench 2.1, 16.95% on Terminal-Bench 3.0, and 79.00% on Terminal-Bench Hard. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22192) ## Source-stated The authors report strict completion on LHTB rising from 0/46 to 5/46 and SWR100 success rising from 3.00% to 6.00%. > On LHTB, process reward rises from 0.21 to 0.37 and strict completion from 0/46 to 5/46; SWR100 success doubles from 3.00% to 6.00%. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22192) ## Source-stated The authors say each retained stage consolidates discovered behaviors and advances the agent from partial local repairs toward strict terminal verification. > each retained stage consolidates discovered behaviors and progressively advances the agent from partial local repairs to strict terminal verification. - [Supporting source](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22192) ## Source and contributor context Yang, Junyao, Li, Zongxia, Shi, Yucheng, Li, Zhongzhi, Wang, Ruhan, Zhou, Ruiwen, Mi, Haitao, Yan, Shuicheng, Liang, Leowei · Article author These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage. ## Source media No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction. ## Terms and references Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement. ## Benchmark A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected. - [Definition reference](https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09110) ## arXiv arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed. - [Explore this context](/entities/arxiv) - [Reference](https://arxiv.org/) - [Reference](https://info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html) ## Editorial provenance Version 1. Publication ID: 6eac5b84-8213-446b-84a2-7c7225b6cddf. Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna. Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-10T11:03:28.148Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true. Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material\_development. Observation: 930b240ab727b812a33d5131ad7a0c90e6f426198370d169d80a09301cfed10c. Source text hash: 26136e792173e644dc32055982a9c118131f7116c226bd28aace4295a6415f21. ### uncertain — 2026-11-10T11:03:28.148Z — anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 Publication: 6eac5b84-8213-446b-84a2-7c7225b6cddf attribution — pass: The method, benchmark scores and stage-consolidation claim are attributed to Junyao Yang and coauthors in an arXiv paper, matching the listed authors and the abstract's first-person framing. > Authors:Junyao Yang, Zongxia Li, Yucheng Shi, Zhongzhi Li, Ruhan Wang, Ruiwen Zhou, Haitao Mi, Shuicheng Yan, Leowei Liang summary — uncertain: The central term 'terminal agents' is never explained; a general reader may not know these are AI agents that work through a computer command-line terminal. 'Trajectories' is also undefined. The title term 'Recursive Self-Improving' (RSI) is reduced to 'refining', which weakens the source's framing. Smallest repair: explain 'terminal agent' and 'trajectory' in plain words and name the recursive self-improvement framing as the authors' term. LHTB and SWR100 are also undefined, but the source does not explain them either. > Recursive Self-Improving Terminal Agents via Recursive Self-Rewrite and Policy-Refine date — pass: originalPublished 2026-10-15 matches the v1 submission date. The 30 Oct date is a later revision, and 2 Nov is only the feed date. > \[Submitted on 15 Oct 2026 (v1), last revised 30 Oct 2026 (this version, v3)\] support — pass: All numeric claims match the abstract exactly. The draft keeps them as the authors' reports, labels them as benchmark results rather than real-world performance, and notes the missing baselines and task details. The closing question does not assume an answer. > On LHTB, process reward rises from 0.21 to 0.37 and strict completion from 0/46 to 5/46; SWR100 success doubles from 3.00% to 6.00%. media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct link to the arXiv abstract page, the original source. ## Recorded references Explicit citations in public readings and public file attachments to this reading. Shared topics are not citations. Other artifact types need an explicit reference adapter. No public references recorded here yet. [Reference data (JSON)](/readings/01452c4028f92db66c4d6ac1b7bcbf175b6d8de685b73a00a4d1a8a6d11ef721/references.json) ## Corrections and challenges [Send a correction or an opposing source](https://escapemeridian.com/corrections/) [JSON record](https://escapemeridian.com/readings/yang-and-coauthors-arxiv-paper-proposes-terminal-rsi-for-01452c40.json)